Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
By MUSHTAK PARKER | ARAB NEWS
Published: Mar 28, 2011 00:07 Updated: Mar 28, 2011 00:07
Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank (KTPB), a subsidiary of the Kuwait Finance House (KFH), one of the
pioneers of global Islamic finance, is a leading Turkish participation (Islamic bank). While Turkish
participation banks in general are deemed to be conservative and cautious, KTPB has set the tone by
venturing abroad into Germany, Dubai, Bahrain and Kazakhstan and by pioneering new products based
on physical gold and exporting them to markets in Malaysia and elsewhere through the global network of
KFH. These include gold-backed exchange traded funds (ETFs), gold-backed banking accounts and
sukuk. UfukUyan, CEO of Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank, a doyen of Turkish Islamic banking, has been
at the forefront of the expansion of KTPB, taking it to the top 10 tier of Turkish banks. Here UfukUyan
discusses with Arab News the state of the participation banking sector in Turkey, the performance of
KTPB in 2010 and the prospects and challenges for the industry in 2011 and beyond.
What sort of year has 2010 been for KTPB?
The year 2010 was a perfect year for Kuveyt Turk in particular and in general for the participation banks in
Turkey. The growth of the participation banking sector was double that of the conventional sector. KTPB has now
become one of the top 10 banks in Turkey and in 2010 our balance sheet growth was about 50 percent
compared with 2009. Last year we opened 25 branches and our total number of branches is 156. It is important
for us to be near to our clients. For a medium-sized bank it is normal to have over 200 branches. We plan to
reach this by next year. By the end of this year we plan to have 180 local branches. We also have a branch in
Bahrain since 2002; in Germany; a representative office in Kazakhstan; and a full subsidiary in Dubai at the
DIFC. We also have plans to go to Northern Iraq and open a branch in Erbil; and some other locations which
have not been finalized as yet.
How do you see the prospects for participation banking in 2011 and beyond and what can the
government do to help the sector?
In terms of long-term borrowing, conventional banks can borrow 3-years or 5-years through bond issues and the
taxation side has been in place for many years. We need similar treatment for the participation banks. There is
only one route which is Sukuk issuance. Recently Parliament passed the tax neutrality measures for IjaraSukuk,
but we need the same level playing field for other sukuk structures.
There also no instruments to accommodate the central bank funding requirements of participation banks. So we
need the central bank to issue Sukuk, participation government notes and securities.
This year will be a volatile year for the Turkish banking sector as a whole because of the political environment
because of the elections which are due in January 2012.
PRINT
EMAIL
SHARE
DELICIOUS
DIGG
XAHOO! BUZZ
Comments
Post a comment
Mc
By MUSHTAK PARKER | ARAB NEWS
Published: Apr 3, 2011 22:53 Updated: Apr 3, 2011 22:53
The UK Treasury is fast-tracking a number of laws in the Finance Bill 2011 to plug several tax avoidance
loopholes including those related to high-end stamp duty land tax (SDLT) in commercial property
transactions ² both conventional and alternative (Islamic) real estate transactions.
The loophole includes the use of offshore vehicles to avoid paying full stamp duty tax on property transactions,
normally in excess of 500,000 pounds up to a few millions of pounds.
Chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne, in his recent 2011 budget speech to the House of Commons
emphasized that ³there¶s one area that needs extra work in the coming months, and that¶s on the taxation of very
high value property, where evasion and avoidance are widespread and some of the wealthiest are not paying
their fair share. We will be redoubling our efforts to find ways of ensuring that owners of high value property
cannot avoid paying their fair share. Unfortunately, not enough has been done in recent years to tackle this
injustice. Her Majesty¶s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) estimate that 14 billion pounds were lost through
avoidance and evasion in 2008. We will close down three forms of stamp duty land tax avoidance, tighten capital
gains rules for companies ² and end the practice of disguised remuneration, which sees highly paid employees
offered tax-free, lifetime loans that are never repaid.´
There have been some ill-informed reports in the British media a few days before the budget speech on March 23
warning that the Shariah is being used by Muslims to dodge SDLT for Islamic mortgages. Suffice to say that the
loopholes have nothing to do with the Shariah or Islamic financial law, because the UK does not recognize this in
its finance legislation. Any enabling legislation in successive finance bills over the last few years dealing with
Shariah-compliant financial products does not refer to anything Islamic. These products are classified as
alternative financing schemes, whether mortgages or financial investment bonds (sukuk) and come under the
provisions of the UK banking laws.
The loopholes in the SDLT are exploited by savvy lawyers and tax accountants whether for conventional or
Alternative Islamic property transactions and HM Treasury have been aware of these for some time but hitherto
successive Chancellors have failed to act to plug the loopholes.
According to HM Treasury, the new tax avoidance measure will affect those who seek to avoid paying SDLT on
the purchase of an interest in land. As such, legislation will be introduced in finance bill 2011 to make three
changes to ensure or put beyond doubt that certain SDLT avoidance schemes are ineffective. The changes affect
the relationship between the rules on sub-sales and the alternative (Islamic) finance reliefs; the definition of a
³financial institution´ for the purposes of the SDLT alternative (Islamic) finance reliefs; and the way the
consideration is determined where land is exchanged.
The measure, maintains HM Treasury, supports the government¶s objective of a fairer tax system by ensuring
that SDLT is not avoided. Due to the risk of forestalling, HM Treasury did not embark on a formal consultation
with the market. However, a limited, confidential discussion has taken place with some external stakeholders.
³The changes will have effect on or after March 24, subject to the details of the commencement provisions. If
transactions or arrangements span March 24 then careful consideration of the commencement provisions will be
necessary, but, broadly speaking, where transactions or arrangements were entered into before 24 March 2011
but completed afterward, the old rules will apply,´ said a Treasury explanatory note.
The Treasury does not anticipate any adverse equalities or financial inclusion impact. Two of the proposed
changes relate to reliefs for ³alternative finance´ products i.e. financial products designed to be compliant with
Islamic law. However, HM Treasury stresses that the changes will not restrict the availability of the reliefs except
where they are being misused to avoid tax.
The Treasury may have put any UK debut sovereign sukuk origination on ice, but one area it continues to consult
and refine is tax matters relating to Islamic finance. As shown above, this deal with both neutrality issues to
ensure that there is a level playing field for equivalent Islamic financial products and to make sure that the UK
taxpayer and HMRC are not put at a disadvantage through any potential loopholes or peculiarities of Islamic
financial structures.
In fact, the SDLT on alternative property financing and refinancing was amongst other things discussed at the last
Islamic finance tax technical working group meeting on Oct. 6, 2010 at HM Treasury. The included the draft
capital gains legislation, an update on the position with regards to capital allowances; purchase and resale
arrangements and linked purchase and resale arrangements relating to property transactions.
The meeting revealed that:
a) There are no plans to issue further guidance on VAT rules for Islamic finance products at this time.
b) An EU working party is in the process of reviewing VAT and financial services. In respect of Islamic finance,
this was being considered within the negotiations of the draft directive and regulation text but was not considered
directly as a subject matter (although that may change going forward).
c) The value for money (VFM) case for not issuing a UK debut sovereign sukuk is poor (conceded the Treasury)
but that the situation is under review.
d) Market players offered to provide HM Treasury with further evidence in support of a UK sovereign sukuk and
the likely demand from investors.
In fact, HMRC put its latest draft of proposed changes to income and corporation tax to cater for the Shariah-
compliant equivalent of a variable rate loan and also a regime to cater for the developing market in Islamic
finance derivatives out for consultation with the deadline of 31 March 2011 for any responses.
These relate to purchase and resale arrangements in Murabaha contracts including linked ones and where
returns are in foreign currency; and those involved in Islamic finance derivatives.
³Islamic finance derivative products,´ according top the draft, ³are a developing area, and often use arrangements
such as Murabaha or other combinations of Islamic finance products to bring together the desired product. In
order for these arrangements to benefit from the rules contained within Part 7 Corporation Tax Act 2009, some
modifications are needed to certain provisions. Our aim is to create a regime for Islamic finance derivatives by
creating the concept of an ³alternative hedging arrangement´. This would be an arrangement in addition to the
existing forms of derivative product catered for in Part 7 Corporation Tax Act 2009, but which is broadly
equivalent to the conventional products already provided for within the rules.´
In fact, the document uses the term ³alternative hedging arrangement´ instead of the previous ³alternative
derivate arrangement´ as it is closer to the wording used in the ISDA/IIFM Ta¶Hawwut Master Agreement.
Y
u
u u
Y
Y
YY
Y
Y YY
Y
YYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Y
YY
YYY
YYY Y
YY#YYY
YYYYYYYYY
Y$
Y
YYY
YY !YYY
YYYYY
Y
YY
YY
YYYYY YYYYY Y
Y
YYYYY
+7
5YYYYYYYYY$
Y
YY
+8
5Y
YY&YY
Y
YYYYYY
YYYYY+YY 624Y
YYY;Y Y
YY
Y
9
5YYYYYYYYY 6 4<Y
Y
YY=
Y Y
Y=Y;Y
YYYYYY7
5YYY Y
&YYYYYYYYYYYY
YYYY
YYYYYY=Y>
YYYY
YYYYYYYYYYY
YYYY
Y
Y
?&YYYYY
YYYYYYY
Y
Y-Y-YY;YY
Y
?YYYY
Y&(YYY Y@Y$
YY?&Y
YYYYYY
YYY
YY 64
? Y
YYY8
YYY
YYYYYYY
YYYYYYY
YY#YY
YY&Y/YYY
YYYY;YBY'Y
YY
Y&YYY
YYY Y
YY
Y
YY
Y