0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
169 vizualizări28 pagini
NEBRASKA COURT of APPEALS ERRED in CONCLUDING THAT MERS MEETS the DEFINITION of A "MORTGAGE BANKER" UNDER NEB. REV. STAT. SS 45-702(6). DISTRICT COURT SHOULD HAVE RECOGNIZED THAT MERS' OWNERSHIP of A LEGAL INTEREST in the SECURITY DOCUMENT DOES NOT EQUATE TO MERS
Descriere originală:
Titlu original
MERS Appellants Brief MERS v Nebraska Dept of Banking File 15 Oct 2004
NEBRASKA COURT of APPEALS ERRED in CONCLUDING THAT MERS MEETS the DEFINITION of A "MORTGAGE BANKER" UNDER NEB. REV. STAT. SS 45-702(6). DISTRICT COURT SHOULD HAVE RECOGNIZED THAT MERS' OWNERSHIP of A LEGAL INTEREST in the SECURITY DOCUMENT DOES NOT EQUATE TO MERS
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
NEBRASKA COURT of APPEALS ERRED in CONCLUDING THAT MERS MEETS the DEFINITION of A "MORTGAGE BANKER" UNDER NEB. REV. STAT. SS 45-702(6). DISTRICT COURT SHOULD HAVE RECOGNIZED THAT MERS' OWNERSHIP of A LEGAL INTEREST in the SECURITY DOCUMENT DOES NOT EQUATE TO MERS
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd