Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
as the model of the rugged individual, a foreshadow of the modern capitalist. This
characterization has been laregly founded on two core arguments: Robinson’s selfish pursuit of
his desires in spite of his familie’s wishes and Robinson’s utilitarian characterization of his
relationships in primarily economic terms1. While these arguments are persuasive, they lack any
consideration for the narrative structure of the fictional, yet self-described as authentic,
autobiography; even though, Robinson Crusoe does seemingly possess the motives and
actions of the “the middle state, or what might be called the upper station of low life”2, these
motives and actions are all retroactively described by a fictional narrator who in the presentation
of his life does so with an agenda driven to validate the authenticity of his accounts as much as
to simply narrate. Consequently, the construction of self in Robinson Crusue is not so much an
economic unit, driven by the nascent individualism of the European middle class, as it is a
solipsistic mental construct trying to explain and justify its existence to both itself and its
audience. In this consideration of the narrative construct, the selfishness of Crusoe’s youth is
not so much proof of his individualism as it provides the religious context for the series of
calamitous events in his life and the economic qualifications to his relationships are not so much
While Crusoe states that “no vessel could say to [God] ‘Why hast thou formed me
thus?’”3, Crusoe
“Why has God done this to me? What have I done to be thus used?” 125
“deliverance from sin a much greater blessing than deliverance from affliction” 131
“But, alas! For me to do wrong that never did right, was no great wonder. I hail no
them” 84