Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
“This is a society where women are considered a personal possession and are
viewed as the honour of the family and society. This patriarchal mindset restricts
freedom of women and pressurizes them to act according to the set paradigm of the
society, with no role of intervention in decision making. In majority of cases, from the
level of education to choice of life partner, voice of family prevails, leaving lesser
space for individual preference. In addition after marriage, women face oppression,
but she bears it for the sake of family, the biggest institution of our society.”
In the patriarchal society women are not only subdued physically but
economically too. Economy plays a major role in life at all stages. Since most of the
women are groomed and prepared for a life as a home maker, her contribution cannot
be converted into monetary terms. Thus despite working 24 hours a day her
contribution in the economy is nil. That also determines the deplorable status of
women in Indian society.
According to Dhananjay Tripathi, “If we first take the gender nations
development index of the world, the position of India is reprehensible.” According to
UN development program which prepares the gender development index, during the
period 2000-2005, India’s standing on this scale dipped from 105 to 113. The sex
ratio, which reflects preference for male child over female child in a society the
position of India, has continuously deteriorated in successive censuses from 1901 to
2001. As per census 1901 the sex ratio was 972 which went down to 933 in 2001.
States having predominantly feudal social structures like Bihar, Rajasthan, Haryana
fare poorer than the national aveage.
There are innumerable reasons for these deteriorating trends. Firstly, dowry
system where girl’s parents are required to take the responsibility of all expenses
during marriage. According to the National crime record bureau (NCRB) one dowry
death is reported every 77 minute even today.
Fifthly, the “ Caste system which is not only based on structural inequalities
between the high caste and low caste ‘untouchable’ but also involves social isolation
and exclusion from participation in social, political and economic processes and
development of society. The Dalit women are a victim of discrimination at two levels-
by the high caste on the basis of her untouchable status by birth as well as on the basis
of her gender by her own caste members.”
Poverty also plays a major role in determining the specific role and position of
women in any social structure.
- It would reserve at least 181 seats for women in lower house of the
Parliament thereby taking away that many seats from men.
- One third of the total number of seats reserved for SC/ST shall be
reserved for women of those group in Lok Sabha and the legislative
assemblies.
- Reservation of seats shall cease to exist 15 years after the
commencement of constitution amendment act.
In the history of Indian Parliament there have been many bills which were
introduced with the best of intentions but could not see the light of the day for one or
the other reason. However the story of Women Reservation bill is different from those
bills which although got tabled on the floor but could not sail through the house. The
Women reservation Bill has faced peculiar problem of being thwarted before being
introduced in the house. On several occasions the copies of the bill have been
snatched by our supposedly learned Parliamentarians and torned apart in the house in
full media glare. Many of them have openly flaunted their discontent and contempt
for the bill. They don’t even want a discussion on the merit or otherwise of the bill
even in the highest democratic forum of the country. It is not the provisions of the bill
as such but the intellectual poverty of our political leadership, led predominantly by
men, who are not rising above their parochial and chauvinistic value systems. They
are representing the psyche of a typical man who wants to dominate woman in all
conditions. They are insecure of their own competence.
It is the fear of loosing their share in Parliament and in turn their traditional
strangle hold on policy making that has virtually united the male politicians across the
party line in an effort to deny the passage of the bill.
These arguments hold justified till the society at large is dominated by men
and state in turn lacks will to disturb the prevalent social order.
One of the major concerns of some major political parties who are opposed to
the concept of reservation for women is their fear that only elite women with political
patronage will get elected leading to concentration of elite urban women in
Parliament. Reservation for women/SC/ST is based on the concept of affirmative
discrimination in favour of weaker sections of the society. This is consciously
formulated by the legislature in case of reservation at Panchayat level in political
arena, reservation in educational institutions for ameliorating the conditions of the
weaker section at social level and reservation at job opportunity at the economic level.
When reservation is provided in India at so many levels then why are hurdles created
in the Parliament reserving seats in Lok Sabha. Is it because providing reservation at
different levels doesn’t challenge the domination of men in Parliament for most
political parties which will be severely dented with one third of the members being
women. There is no denying the fact that the same political class which has
vehemently argued for reservation policy in all spheres of life for decades has rejected
the idea when it was threatened by women reservation bill for reservations in
legislatures. Probably the very thought of sharing the highest level of power with
women doesn’t go down well with our political class.
Opponents of the bill also argue that it would perpetuate the unequal status of
women since they would not be perceived to be competing on merit. However a
beginning has to be made at some point of time. During initial years of Panchayat
elections there were serious apprehensions on active participation of women in
contesting and voting in Panchayat elections. But recent studies have reflected that
women have grabbed the opportunity to actively participate in Panchayat elections. It
is seen that women are more conscious about allocation of funds for various projects
and its utilisation. In places where women are active in Panchayats, resources are
better utilised for women specific projects. Thus it can safely be dismissed that
women will not contest on merit. Today competent women represent almost all
political parties.
It is also contended that it would divert attention from the larger issues of
electoral reforms such as criminalisation of politics and inner party democracy. This
apprehension lacks merit in its argument. Reservation for women itself will be an
electoral reform. Women’s presence in large number will automatically address both
issues of criminalisation of politics and inner party democracy. Women are known to
have least criminal background and their representation itself reflect democratisation
of a political party.
The reservation of seats for women on specific seats also restricts voter choice
to only women candidates.
Thus as Justice Rajendra Sachar has written presciently in the people’s union
of civil liberties bulletin in 2003 ‘ To impact one third of the male members to accept
political hara-kiri is unrealistic. Toady’s Politicians are no Gandhians. They will not
give up their privileges so easily.’ Parliament is still a man’s world.
The basic question that arises is why should there be reservation for women at
all? As stated earlier there are a number of socio-economic and biological reasons
which determines the cause for reservation for women. Women represent half of the
population of a country and should have natural rights to half of the seats at any
platform. They deserve to have dominant role in decisions affecting their lives
directly or indirectly. A number of legislations have been passed e.g. family planning
measures; maintenance after divorce, the number is endless, where the affected
subject doesn’t get the opportunity to decide about it. Laws are made by men who
perceive any issue within their own framework thus ignoring the vital input required
from the target group. There may be wisdom among men to decide based on extensive
research on a problem but there is no better way to decide than involving the subject
itself in the process.
Women have different social and biological experiences that affect their lives.
Social stigmas, social pressure and social norms of society are different for sexes.
Thus to understand and formulate a law which has wider implication on women their
participation is essential. In addition women and men have partly conflicting interests.
In a patriarchal society men want to be conservative on all issues as it suits them and
maintain the status quo. Breaking the established norms of society like widow
remarriage, giving property rights to women, providing education to women and
economic opportunities etc ultimately breaks the domain of patriarchy.
Political power yields dignity and equality. Thus women in position of power
can inspire more women to adopt the empowerment route to emancipation.
Although there is no need for debate on the merits or otherwise of the issue of
reservation for women the level of resistance it has encountered in Parliament and
outside it appears that there are serious apprehensions among political class about the
workability and acceptability of some provisions incorporated in the bill. This bill has
been drafted in right spirit and should sail through the Parliament in its original form.
However there have been some suggestions on alternatives to achieve broad political
consensus for successful passage of the bill. Some of these suggestions are :-
In fact no one opposes the idea that more women should have access to
political power. Apart from above suggestion there is yet another suggestion i.e. a
system of ‘twinning’ whereby two seats are twinned, each having to field a man and
woman. And should there be quota within the quota?
There is a school of thought which advocates quota for Dalit women within
33% quota reserved for women. Some of the political parties advancing the cause of
Dalits are strongly rooting for this clause in the bill before they are brought in to the
fold to support the bill. The debate goes on till we see the light at the end of the
tunnel.
REFERENCES
10 www.indiatogethr.org
Tripathi, Dhananjay, Women Reservation Bill: Look beyond the narrow prism