Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43rd ANNUAL MEETING - 1999 797

MODEL-BASED DEVELOPMENT OF WEB BASED HUMAN PERFORMANCE


MANAGEMENT TOOLS: AN EXAMPLE FROM FINANCIAL SERVICES

Gunilla A. Sundström, Tony Ip, Beth Maddix, Marva Moore,


Prabha Ramakrishnan, Bill Rideout, Yael Yona
GTE Laboratories Incorporated
40 Sylvan Road
Waltham, MA 02454

Abstract: Management of resources in geographically distributed operations


environments such as call centers poses many challenges including: (1) identifying which
measures should be used as key performance indicators, (2) creating a shared view of
performance management across geographical boundaries and enforcing usage of a
common set of performance indicators. The present paper describes results from a multi-
year effort to address these two challenges. A set of models were developed by
leveraging functional modeling concepts proposed in the area of human-machine
systems. These were used to specify the information required and how it must be used in
monitoring and managing call center agents’ performance. These models were the key
building blocks of a user-centered design approach used to develop Web based
performance management tools. A description of modeling process as well as an
overview of the resulting tools and their impact on operational efficiency are provided.

design process. The next section provides a brief description


1. INTRODUCTION
of the development process and the system architecture. Some
Telephony based call centers are a critical part of business key observations of the impact of using the developed tools in
operations in any services industry, including call centers are highlighted in the last two sections of the
telecommunications and financial services. Call centers are paper. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the
one of the major points of contact for customers and as such value of leveraging approaches from other complex system
can have a critical impact on customers’ perceptions of a areas to the development of novel tools to support business
brand and/or an organization’s ability to provide services. The operations.
primary operational goal of a call center is to provide
customers with what they need, when they need it in a cost-
efficient way. This objective is achieved by using technology 2. THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COLLECTIONS
and human resources with about 80% of the overall PROCESS
operational costs being expended on human resources.
A systems engineering view of the collections process is
Efficient human performance management is critical not only depicted in Figure 1. The outbound collection process entails
to keep customers “happy” but also to ensure operational the use of predictive dialer technology (See Figure 1). This
efficiency. While excellent discussions about call center
technology is used to automatically call delinquent account
management best practices are available from a practitioner’s
holders. If the call is answered, an agent will try to elicit
perspective (e.g., Cleveland & Mayben, 1998), few attempts
immediate payment by credit card or a promise to pay. An
exist to leverage concepts and lessons learned from the efficient outbound collections process maximizes the number
analysis, design and modeling of other large-scale operations of promises to pay while minimizing the time call center staff
environments. The primary objective of the present work is to
spend online with customers.
leverage models and concepts proposed in the context of
analysis and design of decision support for industrial process 3. THE APPROACH
control to develop tools to manage outbound call center
activities. Specifically focus is on management of outbound A model-based user-centered approach was adopted to
financial services collections processes. Financial services identify the performance measures needed and how these
collections processes are established to collect money from measures should be organized and presented to end-users via
customers who fail to pay their bills on time. Web based tools. The simple idea being that, as in all
In the first section of this paper, the problem domain is complex systems, a set of models is needed to capture key
described by highlighting the main characteristics of a characteristics of the system. In particular, focus was on
financial services collections process from a systems understanding functional relationships of the system and the
engineering perspective. The second section outlines the information needed by decision-makers to monitor and
approach, namely a model-based user centered analysis and manage behavior of the system.
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43rd ANNUAL MEETING - 1999 798

modeling approach (Lind, 1981). Figure 2 illustrates the


functional model using the concepts of means and goals to
create relationships among operational goals.
1 2

Billing Predictive Collections Top


Dialer System Goal: Maximize $’s collected while minimizing costs
System

Minimize resources
Sub-Goals/ Maximize Maximize used to collect
Means: credit card # of promises
payments to pay
3 4
5
Sub-Goals/ Minimize time spent Minimize time spent to elicit a
Means: to obtain a credit card promise to pay
payment
Sub- Maximize # of times
Goals/Means: accountholders are reached

1 Customer payments are posted in the billing system Sub-


Goals/Means: Maximize time spent calling customers
Delinquent accounts are moved to the predictive dialer
2
Sub-
Supervisor designs a calling strategy, i.e., identify customers Goals/Means: Minimize time
3 Minimize time
to be called away from desk
updating accounts
Predictive dialer calls customer and call is managed by
4 call center staff. Figure 2: Goal-Means Model Created Using Lind’s Modeling
Concepts
Result is recorded by call center staff in the
5
collections system.
Note that each goal is defined in such a way that it is
associated with the composite behavior of both human and
technology elements within operations. This is the behavior
Figure 1. The Financial Services Collections Process that needs to be monitored and managed using the Web
application. The present work was focused on the
The modeling and design process included the following development of tools to support monitoring and management
key activities: of the path highlighted in Figure 2.
(1) Extensive on-site visits, including interviews with
management and supervisors, to understand the collections 3.1.2. Modeling decision making information needs. In
process. Semi-structured forms were used to organize and addition to dialing customer’s phone numbers, the predictive
collect the information. dialer is the primary tool used to track information about the
(2) On-site observations and video recording of day-to-day outbound calling activities. The predictive dialer records
operations to extract information for the Functional critical information regarding each of the calls placed to
Information and Knowledge Acquisition (FIKA) model. customers. Therefore, an in-depth analysis of the predictive
FIKA forms were used to structure the on-site observations dialer technology was performed to identify process data. The
(cf. Sundstrom & Salvador, 1995). identified process data was used to specify a performance
(3) Sessions with key staff to develop the model. measurement model. This model was developed in
(4) In depth analysis of data collected by the systems used in collaboration with collections experts using a combination of
the collections process including the predicitve dialer and the semi-structured interviews and on-site observations. The
collections system. measures in the model were classified into three categories: (a)
“Volume” measures, i.e., measures regarding the number of
3.1. The Analysis and Modeling Approach calls and the amount of time the agents used for various
activities associated with the calls. Example of measures
3.1.1. Leveraging Lind’s multi-level flow modeling included in this category are number of connects (i.e., the
approach. A functional model was developed to model key number of outbound calls transferred to the agent(s) by the
operational goals of the basic collections process. This Mosaix® predictive dialer system during the time period) and
model was created leveraging Lind’s multi-level flow online time (i.e., how long the agent(s) was connected to the
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43rd ANNUAL MEETING - 1999 799

predictive dialer during the time period). (b) “Interaction” The tools were implemented using primarily Microsoft’s
measures, i.e., measures reflecting the results of the customer back-office, COM, scripting (i.e., ASP) and Microsoft’s Web
interactions. For example., the number of “Promises to Pay” technology including IIS4.0.
customers make during the time period is included in this
category. (c) System effectiveness measures, i.e., measures 5. FINDINGS
indicating the behavior of the predictive dialer. While this
performance measurement model identified how data from the The Web based tools were deployed in a set of
predictive dialer was mapped into performance indicators it geographically distributed call centers. These Web based
did not specify how the information needs to be used in tools were primarily used by the first-line supervisors to assess
operations. As described in Sundström (1997) functional performance of outbound collections agents.
models can be used to define how information needs to be After the web-based tools were deployed improvements
used to make various decisions. In this work, the FIKA in the following were observed in each call center:
modeling approach was used to identify how information (1) Performance measure behavior. Key performance
needs to be used to assess whether or not operational goals are measures moved in desirable directions. For example, the
met (Sundström, 1993, 1997). The FIKA model provided the number of times an outbound call reached a person
necessary information to start the design of the web tools. responsible for the delinquent account increased. Thus, the
number of opportunities to elicit a promise to pay increased.
4. THE WEB TOOLS DEVELOPMENT (2) Opportunities to coach staff. One of the major benefits
of the tool is that first line supervisors could spend more time
4.1. Iterative Prototyping Process coaching staff because information required to make decisions
about performance was readily available.
The FIKA model was used to extract initial requirements (3) Information Sharing . The use of Web technology
and provided the input to a series of prototypes. Each enabled centralized functions to obtain daily insight into
prototype was reviewed with stakeholders including end-users. operations at all geographical locations. In addition, the tool
A fieldable prototype was deployed at one call center site to enabled supervisors to share information with their staff and
collect additional requirements using semi-structured thus discuss performance issues more objectively.
interviews as well as on-site observations. A production
version was developed based on these final requirements. 6. DISCUSSION

Leveraging modeling and analysis techniques developed


4.2 The Architecture in the area of industrial process control proved to be a
critical part of a complex tools development process. A
An n-tier architecture layering the different types of functional model was developed to model operational
enterprise services was used. These services include data, objectives and to achieve agreement among stakeholders
business, analytical, content and presentation services. Figure about what the key objectives were. A functional
3 provides a functional application overview. information and knowledge acquisition (FIKA) model was
developed to specify the information needed to make
Business assessments related to the various operational objectives. A
Rules model-based user centered iterative design process was
Services successfully used to develop a complex set of Web based
tools to support human performance management in a
distributed complex operations environment. The deployed
tools demonstrated a very favorable impact on key aspects of
DB Data Web operations in a distributed complex environment.
Content Server
Services
Services
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Analytical Gunilla A Sundström is now with Intelligroup Inc., Center of


Services Presentation Excellence for Internet Solutions, 9013 N.24th Avenue, Suite
Services 6, Phoenix, AZ 85021, USA.

Figure 3: Web Tools Application Architecture


PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 43rd ANNUAL MEETING - 1999 800

REFERENCES
design in complex dynamic environments: Concepts and
Cleveland, B. & Mayben, J. (1998). Call Center prototype implementations. International Journal of Man-
Management on Fast Forward: Succeeding in Today's Dynamic Machine Studies, vol. 38, 567– 586.
Inbound Environment. Annapolis, Maryland: Call Center Sundström, G.A. & Salvador, A (1995). Integrating field
Press. Work in System Design: A Methodology and Two Case
Lind, M. (1981). The use of flow models for automated Studies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and
plant diagnosis. In J. Rasmussen & W.B. Rouse (Eds.) Cybernetics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp.385-399.
Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures (pp. 411- Sundström, G.A. (1997). Designing Support Contexts: Helping
432). London: Plenum Press. Operators to Generate and Use Knowledge. Control Engineering
Sundström, G.A. (1993). User modeling for graphical Practice, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 375-381.

S-ar putea să vă placă și