Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Business Strategy.
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
===========================================================================
=====================
The company also deploys, owns and manages passive infrastructure pertaining to telecom
operations under its subsidiary Bharti Infratel Limited. Bharti Infratel owns 42% of Indus
Towers Limited. Bharti Infratel and Indus Towers are amongst top providers of passive
infrastructure services in India.
Inthe2000s,telecommunications(telecom)companyBhartiAirtelLimited(BAL)wasthemarket
leader in the Indian telecom market. It had established itself as the leader in the market by
differentiating itself with its focus on building a strong brand through innovation in sales,
marketing, and customer service, and an innovative cost effective business model. Analysts
also credited BAL with negotiating the regulatory hurdles in this emerging market and
competition very effectively. This enabled it to become profitable despite the Indian telecom
market having the lowest tariffs in the world.
Some analysts opined that BAL's unique business model had become the benchmark for
emerging markets. Mobile telephony in India was experiencing the fastest growth in the world
and India was already one of the leading markets in terms of mobile subscriber base. Despite
Average Revenue per User (ARPU) figures in the country being quite low compared to many
other markets, it was viewed as an attractive market as mobile penetration of the market,
particularly in the huge rural areas in India, was still low. With the developing market in the
West reaching high levels of saturation (70% in US and 100% in some European markets), many
global telecom operators were looking at emerging markets for their growth and this made India
a prime target market for these firms. The market in India was also expected to witness many
changes with the introduction of new technologies and mobile number portability.
BAL had been facing serious threats to its leadership position. On the one hand, there was the
onslaught from global players such as Vodafone and Virgin Mobile, and on the other, the threat
from established Indian companies such as Reliance Communications Ltd., Tata Teleservices
Ltd., and the state-owned Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL). Moreover, the market was
expected to witness the entry of some more Indian and foreign companies. BAL had responded
to investing heavily in expanding its network, technology, and marketing. It was trying to cover
all segments of the population -from the tech-savvy youth population who coveted the latest
value-added services (VAS) to the Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP) segment who would be satisfied
with a low-cost offering.
In early 2008, BAL, which still dominated the Indian telecom market and was the world's tenth
largest telecom company, was also readying itself to replicate its success story in some other
emerging markets.
India is fast emerging as the Telecom hub of the world both in terms of the growing demand, size of
the market, setting up of the manufacturing facilities in India by leading players across the world and,
the inflow of FDI, which is currently the highest in all the sectors of Indian industry. The Indian
telecom market can be divided into three segments: the mobile (wireless) market,
Compensation:
According to various studies in recent times, the telecom sector offers the best salary packages at
the entry level i.e. an average of 20k. The average hike in salaries across the various levels in the
telecom sector ranges from 15 to 20 percent. Incentives also form a part of the compensation till
the middle levels.
Job Description :
Monitor and coordinate Payroll Operation processes to deliver consistent error-free payroll
output across the organization. Provide support for integrating the Payroll Management System
with Oracle HRMS & other systems for better service delivery. Looking after Retirals like PF,
Gratuity, Superannuation coordination with the Third party vendors, employees , Finance & HR.
Timely & Accurate Payroll service delivery for business entities/circles.1.Interface with payroll
coordinators at business entities/circles for timely inputs to the vendor.
Checking completeness and accuracy of inputs as per policies/guidelines.
Interface with the Vendor for processing of inputs and timely output delivery to the payroll
coordinators
Check and confirm effectiveness of payroll processing with payroll coordinators and outsource
partner and devise & implement processes for improvement.
Provide necessary support in Implementation of payroll automation and integration with Oracle
HRMS1.Analysis of current policies/process and provide basic rules for automation of payroll
process
Check and confirm local practices/systems followed in the business units and policy/process
gaps across organisation, prepare overall guidelines and provide required information for
automation.
Payroll Query resolution1.Resolution of escalated one-to-one queries from Payroll Coordinators
and Outsource Processor/Vendor
Understand, gather the data and provide resolution to escalated queries from employees related
to payroll process.
Implementation of various types of Dashboard / Metric Report .1. Dashboards/reports for
decision making
Identify gaps in existing processes and undertake projects for improvement in the service
delivery & policy/statutes compliance.
The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (Ficci) will take up the cause of telecom
companies with the telecom regulator. The telecom companies are worried about the recommendations on
2G spectrum made recently by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai).
Come Thursday, Trai would hold a meeting with the operators that is being described as a “grievances
session” by the telecom companies. A team led by Ficci along with members from the Cellular Operators
Association of India (COAI) and the Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (AUSPI)
will hold a closed door meeting with senior Trai officials.
Sources in Trai said Ficci President Rajan Bharti Mittal, who is also the Vice-Chairman and Managing
Director of Bharti Enterprises and a Director and member on Bharti Airtel board, is leading the team.
Ficci's official spokespersons, when contacted, did not confirm or deny his participation in the meeting.
The meeting has been proposed by Ficci, to thrash out the issue of Trai's recommendations on 2G
spectrum. Some of the companies would have to shell out huge amounts of money for the additional
spectrum they hold. These include companies like Bharti Airtel and those who are yet to get spectrum
despite being ahead in the queue, like Tata Teleservice Ltd, if the recommendations are accepted by the
government.
Over the last few days, letters have been shot off by operators to the government seeking partial
acceptance of the recommendations. Trai too shot off letters to the government seeking to clarify its
position and on Tuesday has again written that the operators are unduly worried. It has pointed out that
the regulator was still examining the issues like payment of 3G prices for the additional 2G spectrum
beyond mandated by the government, fixed by the regulator.
In his letter, Trai Chairman J S Sarma has requested the government to hold back a final decision on two
of its recommendation till it gives a final suggestion. Trai had suggested that 3G price be adopted as
‘current price’ of spectrum in the 1800 megahertz band and that refarming of 800/900 MHz spectrum
should be examined. But in the same breath, Sarma has also said that Trai was initiating a separate
discussion on both the issues and these findings would be submitted to the government. Till then, it has
urged the government not to take any decision on these two.
On the other issues, the regulator reiterated that all other recommendations are integral recommendations.
If DoT has any difference of opinion on any of these recommendations, that can be referred back to the
regulator, before the Department of Telecom takes any decision.
Business Strategy
increasing competition from established mobile companies, fixed-line companies moving to
mobile and internet companies moving into the mobile domain is one of the main challenges
Vodafone has to face. In addition, changing technology and therefore tastes, a regulatory
environment that is forcing down call costs, and the fact that Vodafone’s growth has traditionally
been in mow mature markets have worked together to push the company towards five strategic
objectives. Business units have been aligned to strategy: Europe; Eastern Europe, Middle East,
Africa, Asia Pacific, affiliates; and new businesses.
In Europe, the company plans to leverage regional scale to reduce costs and stimulate revenues.
In order to reduce costs Vodafone plans to increase outsourcing, particularly of the customer
management systems and IT development of billing and scale efficiencies will be enhanced
through greater standardization in all areas across the Group, at the global level. The company
sees scope to increase revenues in the fact that its customers only use their mobiles on average
for four minutes a day. New bundles and tariffs, for example Vodafone Passport, which is a
family plan focusing on groups and roaming, will help in this respect as will targeting fixed to
mobile substitution at the business level.
The potential for growth in emerging markets has to some extent been exploited by Vodafone
already, for example in South Africa and Egypt. The company plans to expand on success in
these markets by obtaining stakes in other emerging markets, and where possible, obtaining
control.
Vodafone’s third strategic objective is to deliver a total communications package to its
customers. This will obviously require some innovation as well as a move into homes and offices
through the integration of fixed and mobile services, although the latter will remain the focus.
High speed internet services through HSDPA, DSL and Wi-Fi will be developed, as will
integrated mobile and PC services such as VoIP and instant messaging.
The company’s fourth strategic objective is to actively manage its portfolio by focusing on
acquisitions in specific geographic locations that are likely to offer strong growth and a return on
the cost of capital within three to five years. Vodafone’s policy to exit markets that are no longer
attractive and where there is an opportunity to create value for shareholders has already been
seen in the sale of its stake in Japan in April 2006. GBP6 billion of the settlement will be
returned to shareholders. In answer to speculation over the position Vodafone holds in the US
through Verizon Wireless, Chief Executive Arun Sarin, has stated that the expected continued
growth in the US market warrants Vodafone’s existing stake.
Vodafone’s final strategic objective is to align its capital structure and shareholder returns in
such a way as to support strategy. In order to do this, the company has announced that it will
now pay out 60% of adjusted earnings per share as opposed to 50%. Dividend per share is set to
increase with underlying earningsI