Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
N Engl J Med, Vol. 346, No. 15 · April 11, 2002 · www.nejm.org · 1177
physician realizes that he “forgot to touch or be touched” a description of the details of the study. The quality and va-
while giving bad news to a patient. This line reminds us that lidity of such findings cannot be assessed without consid-
touch includes not only physical touch but also emotional eration of the study design and methods used. Critical read-
and compassionate possibilities as one person’s experience ers will have questions about many of the reported outcomes
affects another’s. But contemporary medicine, in part be- of touch interventions, and conclusions based on evidence
cause of time constraints and sophisticated diagnostic inter- cannot be made from reading this book. On the other hand,
ventions, often limits the use of touch in patient care. The to report all the details of the studies would result in a dif-
public has noticed this change, as suggested by the title of a ferent book. Field appears to be addressing a broad audience:
recent New York Times article: “Are Doctors Losing Touch experts in touch therapies, persons interested in expanding
with Hands-on Medicine?” Medical educators and practic- the use of touch interventions in health care and other set-
ing physicians can learn from our colleagues who are experts tings, and health care professionals in general. In the absence
in using touch and associated therapies. of information about the study design and methods, read-
In this book, Field, director of the Touch Research In- ers need to use caution in accepting (or rejecting) study out-
stitutes at the University of Miami School of Medicine, ar- comes. References are provided for readers who want to take
gues that Western society, including the medical profession, a closer look, and most of the cited articles are in accessible
marginalizes and minimizes the importance of touch. She journals.
reviews many factors, such as concerns about sexual harass- Field’s conclusions, contained in a single paragraph em-
ment, legal repercussions, and an aging population, that bedded in the last chapter of her book, unfortunately do
diminish the use of touch in general. Calling America a not further the direction of research, provide ideas for cur-
“touch-taboo” society, Field questions the restrictions placed ricular innovations at schools for health care professionals,
on touch. One example of an area in which the trend is to or indicate specific recommendations for the integration of
limit touching is education: legal restrictions and fear of touch therapies in our society. Field’s book provides a review
lawsuits restrict a teacher’s ability to comfort a child. of the historical and cultural research on touch, an over-
Touch is a sensation that not only helps us understand view of touch therapies, and a summary of contemporary
our environment but also connects us to others. Field cites topics of research. The outcomes of much of the research
the pioneering work of Ashley Montagu in Touching: The remain in question because of the author’s reporting style.
Human Significance of the Skin (2nd ed., New York: Harper Experts in touch therapy will see this book as a review of
and Row, 1978) and Harry Harlow’s research at the Univer- their field, and some may feel excluded, whereas persons
sity of Wisconsin during the 1950s. Harlow’s experiments who are interested in beginning research on touch or inte-
with infant monkeys and surrogate mothers demonstrated grating touch therapy into everyday practice may be pleased
that the infants “preferred the cloth mother without milk with this book as an introduction to the topic. They will
over the wire mother with milk” — observations that sug- need to draw their own conclusions about the effect of mas-
gested the importance of touch stimulation in early life. sage and other touch therapies used in various settings.
In the initial chapters of her book, Field reviews the tra-
ditions of touching in many cultures from sociological and JULIA E. CONNELLY, M.D.
anthropologic perspectives. She also examines the effect of University of Virginia School of Medicine
touch on growth and development, the effect of therapeutic Charlottesville, VA 22908
massage on the progression of various illnesses, and the use- jec8k@virginia.edu
fulness of massage in maintaining health and preventing dis-
ease. Field explores these and other topics as she reports on Book Reviews Copyright © 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society.
research involving infants, children, adolescents, and adults,
most of it sponsored by the Touch Research Institutes. Com-
mitted to both the use of touch in health care and other
settings and to the scientific exploration of touch, Field of-
fers this book as her attempt to help bring touch into the
mainstream of our lives. B OOKS R ECEIVED
Touch offers information to readers with scientific back- The receipt of these books is acknowledged, and this listing must be regarded
grounds and those with general interests in touch and related as sufficient return for the courtesy of the sender. Books that appear to be
therapies. There are, for example, concise, informative re- of particular interest will be reviewed as space permits. The Journal does
views of the skin and its neurologic connections and of ther- not publish unsolicited reviews.
apies that involve touch. These presentations are clear and
concise, but they are not a comprehensive or detailed review
ANESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE
of the topics.
I had several concerns as I read this book. One is the em- Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Edited
by Antonio Gullo. 973 pp., illustrated. New York, Springer-Verlag,
phasis on Field’s own research. She may be a leader in the 2001. $85.95. ISBN 88-470-0136-6.
field, but there are other investigators whose contributions The Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. Third edition. Edited
are not mentioned. by Ann Harwood-Nuss, with Allan B. Wolfson, Christopher H. Lin-
In addition, the outcomes (e.g., weight in infants, sleep den, Suzanne Moore Shepherd, and Phyllis Hendry Stenklyft.
1827 pp., illustrated. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,
habits, and levels of anxiety) of touch interventions, usually 2000. $199. ISBN 0-7817-1680-2.
massage, and physiological measurements (e.g., cortisol lev- Handbook of Clinical Anesthesia. Fourth edition. Edited by Paul G.
els) after the use of such interventions, are presented without Barash, Bruce F. Cullen, and Robert K. Stoelting. 964 pp., illustrat-
1178 · N Engl J Med, Vol. 346, No. 15 · April 11, 2002 · www.nejm.org