Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1. INTRODUCTION
The Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) registers graduates and professional engineers
under the Registration of Engineers Act 1967 (Revised 2002). The prerequisite for
registration as a graduate engineer is upon successful completion of an accredited
engineering programme.
BEM has a duty to ensure the quality of engineering education/programme attains the
minimum standard comparable to global practice, hence the necessity to have the
Engineering Programme Accreditation Manual.
Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) is the body delegated by BEM for accreditation of
engineering degrees. EAC is represented by the Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM), The
Institution of Engineers Malaysia (IEM), the National Accreditation Board (Lembaga
Akreditasi Negara (LAN)) and the Public Services Department (Jabatan Perkhidmatan
Awam Malaysia (JPA)). This manual outlines details for accreditation of an engineering
programme in Malaysia.
- 1 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
2.0 DEFINITION
2.1 GENERAL
- 2 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
2.2 ACCREDITATION
- 3 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
3.0 OBJECTIVE
- 4 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
4.1 PREAMBLE
University education provides the learning base on which competence for a professional
engineering career is built. It is important that the education provides the graduates with
the generic attributes listed in Section 4.2 below.
It is equally important that the education process be accredited by EAC to give assurance
to the students, the universities, the public and the profession that the education will
indeed provide a graduate with the required attributes. Through the process of
accreditation, EAC ensures that graduates from an accredited programme are adequately
prepared to enter and to continue the practice of engineering.
The following must be in place within the teaching and learning environment:
(i) a strategic statement of objectives by the university on engineering education;
(ii) an identifiable structure responsible for engineering education within the
university;
(iii) an effective advisory mechanism involving industry participation;
(iv) capabilities in terms of staffing and resources to ensure that the stated objectives
can be met.
The minimum requirement for the academic programme with Sijil Tinggi Pelajaran
Malaysia (STPM) or equivalent as the entry requirement is 120 credit hours, full-time
programme normally undertaken over a four-year period. The following elements of the
academic programme are seen as critical to ensuring that the graduates acquire the
generic attributes listed in Section 4.2.
Programmes offered in alternate modes (part-time, distance mode etc) must demonstrate
equivalent content and outcomes as in the normal face to face on campus programme.
- 5 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
There must be a clear statement of the mission and the objective for each programme and
of the broad characteristics expected of a graduate.
The programme structure and content must be such that graduates acquire the generic
attributes listed in Section 4.2, and the programme objectives are met. Typically an
engineering programme should have the following elements:
(i) mathematics, science, engineering principles, skills and tools (computing,
experimentation) appropriate to the discipline of study.
(ii) engineering design and projects.
(iii) integrated exposure to professional engineering practice (including management
and professional ethics).
(iv) electives in related engineering fields
The university shall appoint external examiners/advisors to ensure that the programme
quality and standard reflect relevant best practices.
Accreditation is accorded to the engineering programme, not the faculty or the university.
- 6 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
The EAC’s accreditation process will focus on outcomes as the university develops
internal systems, which ensure that the graduates are adequately prepared to enter the
engineering profession. This will enable the university to play a more significant role in the
accreditation process.
The concept involves quality assurance systems and processes set in place, which will
ensure that graduates are adequately prepared to enter the practice of engineering.
The EAC will normally visit at five-year intervals to ensure that the education being
delivered provides the graduates with the attributes listed in Section 4.2. During the visit,
emphasis will be placed on verification of the standards reached by the students through
detailed inspection of the applicable quality output measures.
University is to submit all the external examiner’s reports annually for each accredited
programme to EAC.
EAC may visit the university from time to time to ensure the quality of the programmes if
necessary.
Accreditation provides: -
(i) confirmation that the programme meets the criteria for accreditation;
(i) public knowledge of programmes accredited by EAC;
(ii) a guarantee to prospective students that the university’s engineering programme
provides entry into the profession;
(iii) a basis for international comparability, reciprocal recognition and graduate
mobility;
(iv) a constructive feedback to the government and university of the basic
requirements of a professional engineering education, and the level of resources
reasonably required to meet these requirements;
(v) consultative feedback on the design of new programmes and modes of delivery,
and assistance in the promotion of innovation and good educational practice.
After the accreditation has been given, and it is found there is non-compliance of
accreditation requirements, EAC reserves the right to cause to cease the accreditation if
the university does not take appropriate action to comply with the requirements within a
specific period set by EAC.
4.11 APPEAL
A university may appeal against a decision made by EAC to the Appeal Board.
4.12 EXPENSES
The university shall bear the cost incurred for carrying out activities in the approval and
accreditation process.
- 7 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
The Policy requires universities to maintain their own industry advisory mechanisms and
consultations with stakeholders. Nevertheless, EAC may wish from time to time to provide
a viewpoint to universities, for example, a perceived need for new programmes in certain
fields, or a suggested change in direction or emphasis. Similarly, it may wish to consult
with universities in forming views to forward to the Government or other third party.
- 8 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
Definition: One credit hour is defined as one hour of lecture per week for a minimum of
14 weeks in a semester (not including examination or mid-term break).
One credit hour equivalent is awarded for 2 hours of laboratory or workshop for a
minimum of 14 weeks in a semester (not including examination or mid-term break).
One credit hour equivalent is awarded to 2 hours of supervised and compulsory tutorial
session for a minimum of 14 weeks in a semester (not including examination or mid term
break) subject to a maximum of one credit hour for each subject in that semester.
The minimum total number of credit hours for an engineering programme with entry
qualification of STPM or equivalent is 120.
Credit hours for remedial classes in language, basic sciences and basic mathematics
shall not be included.
(i) Final year project work to complement engineering studies shall be considered
an engineering subject subject to a minimum of 6 credit hours and a maximum
of 12 credit hours.
(ii) Laboratory work to complement the engineering theory shall be considered as
part of the engineering subjects.
(iii) Industrial training shall be for a minimum of two months duration. Credit hours
allowed are 2 credit hours for the first two months and 2 credit hours per month
for the following months, subject to a maximum of 6 credit hours. The training
shall be adequately structured, supervised and recorded in log books/report.
(iv) It is likely that programmes will increasingly be staffed and delivered in a variety
of modes. These may involve non-traditional channels for student-staff
interaction; student activity and staff support in locations other than that of the
main campus, including franchised programmes, and networking and contracting
- 9 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
among universities and others. The university awarding the degree will be
considered responsible for ensuring the capabilities of all staff involved, and the
panel will require evidence of how this is being achieved.
6.1.3 Tutorial
Tutorial should be part and parcel of the programme so as to complement the lectures.
A tutorial session should preferably not exceed thirty (30) students at any one time.
Students should receive sufficient laboratory work to complement engineering theory that
is learnt through lectures.
Throughout the programme, there should be adequate provision for laboratory or similar
investigative work, which will develop in the young engineer the confidence to deal with
new and unusual engineering problems.
- 10 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
The final year project can provide one of the best means of introducing a real
professional approach to engineering studies. For this reason, the use of projects as a
vehicle for teaching and for integration of subject areas is strongly encouraged
throughout the programme.
It is a requirement for the programme to include a significant project in the later stages.
Whilst group projects, e.g. in design exercises, may be entirely appropriate for work in
earlier years, the final year project is required to demand individual analysis and
judgement, capable of being assessed independently from the work of others. The
student is expected to develop techniques in literature review and information
prospecting.
Where practicable, it is recommended that final year projects should also provide
opportunities to utilise appropriate modern technology in some aspect of the work,
emphasising the need for engineers to make use of computers and multimedia
technology in everyday practice.
Guidelines are offered in this manual for essential elements and features, which together
will render a programme acceptable for accreditation by EAC. The balance between the
essential elements forming the core of the programme and additional specialist or
optional studies will vary with individual programme objectives. The emphasis on
particular elements or features of the programme must remain flexible, but it will be
required in the accreditation process to confirm that minimum levels of understanding and
standards of achievement are attained in the basic subjects relevant to the branch of
engineering.
It is highly desirable that university and industry should work together in keeping
programme objectives and content up-to-date. However, they should not lose sight of the
need to provide an education in engineering, which will form a sound basis for a career
that is likely to see rapid changes in technology. As a general rule, it will be appropriate
for the programme structure to be designed to give a progressive shift of emphasis from
engineering science and principles in the early stages towards more integrated studies in
the final year, in a way that will impact knowledge of applications of fundamentals and
provide a focus for a professional approach.
The essential elements and features are identified for convenience under several
headings, without implying that each is to be treated as a separate or isolated
component.
In general, the syllabus and curriculum content must be adequate in quality and quantity
in terms of coverage and depth.
- 11 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
(vii) communication.
Typical programme contents for selected engineering branches are shown in Appendix
B.
All graduates should have an understanding of the business and social environment in
engineering and of the interaction with technology in the practical decisions of industrial
management. Within an undergraduate programme, this element should not aim to
develop management expertise at the expense of engineering competency, but must
create an awareness of the essential involvement of engineers in business decisions and
an understanding of the broad contribution and responsibility of engineers in industry and
in society. This should also cover an integrated exposure to professional engineering
practice, including management and professional ethics.
6.1.9 Communication
All graduate engineers must be able to communicate effectively, not only with other
engineers but also with all other persons likely to be encountered throughout a
developing career. From the initial stages, careful attention must be given to the skills of
clear, concise reporting - both oral and written - at the level of demand or comprehension
of the recipient. This element should progressively encompass all common methods of
conveying information including sketching, modern drawing office practice, computer
aids, and data transmission and retrieval.
The teaching staff must be sufficient in number and capability to ensure the quality of the
engineering programme and the attainment of its stated outcomes. As a guide, a viable
engineering department would be expected to have a minimum of 8 full-time academic
staff in the specialised field of the engineering programme.
In general, the academic staff should have postgraduate degrees (Master level or higher).
However, staff with good first degree and wide industrial/specialist experience with
acceptable professional qualifications may be considered.
To ensure effective teaching, the full-time equivalent academic staff to student ratio shall
be 1:15 or better.
Teaching load must be compatible with the climate of encouraging research and
professional development. The university is responsible for ensuring a balanced and
conducive environment for effective teaching, research and professional development.
Academic staff, regardless of their individual capabilities, cannot be expected to function
effectively as teachers and seekers of new knowledge if they are heavily burdened with
administrative duties.
Universities may engage part-time staff with acceptable professional qualification in the
related engineering fields. The full-time equivalent of part-time staff should not exceed
30%.
There must also be sufficient qualified and experienced technical and administrative staff
to provide adequate support to the educational programme.
- 12 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
6.2.2 Students
Universities must ensure that students who do not meet the above criteria, undertake
suitable remedial programmes in order to attain the equivalent entry qualification.
6.3 LEARNING FACILITIES
On-campus students should participate in the other activities of the university and of other
parts of the university, and reasonable effort should be made to provide similar
opportunities for distance students.
Laboratories and workshops should be adequately equipped for experiments and “hands-
on” experience in the area of the core subjects. Appropriate experimental facilities must
be available for students to gain substantial experience in understanding and operating
engineering equipment and of designing and conducting experiments. The equipment
must be reasonably representative of modern engineering practice. Where practical work
is undertaken at another university, or in industry, arrangements must be such as to
provide reasonable accessibility and opportunity for learning.
The university must have in place adequate policies and mechanisms for funding the
programme; for attracting, appointing, retaining and rewarding well-qualified staff and
providing for their ongoing professional development; and for providing and updating
infrastructure and support services. It must ensure that creative leadership is available to
the university through the appointment of highly qualified and experienced senior staff in
sufficient numbers.
- 13 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
The university should be able to demonstrate its management system for assessment,
which should include:
(a) examination regulations;
(b) system of assessment and criteria for pass/fail;
(c) preparation procedures for examination papers;
(d) level of examination papers; and
(e) assessment procedures for final year project/industrial training.
The university shall have an external examiner for each programme to independently
review the overall academic standard as shown in Appendix F.
The external examiner should be a person of good standing in the academic and
engineering profession. The external examiner is expected to carry out the overall
assessment of the programme including staff as well as all subjects and laboratory work
undertaken by the students. Assessment is to be made yearly, at the end of each
academic session.
The external examiner’s report shall be included in the application for accreditation.
The university must have systems in place to ensure that the stated outcomes are met
and that the programme objectives and quality are continually reviewed and improved.
The system must include: -
(i) Documented processes for programme planning, curriculum development and
approval and regular curriculum review. The introduction of new programmes or
majors must relate to the educational objectives and needs of the country.
(ii) An admissions system that ensures an acceptable standard of entry for students
from upper secondary schools and other appropriate backgrounds. It may include
qualifying or remedial/bridging programmes where appropriate. There must be
policies on the acceptance of transfer students, validation of programmes taken
for credit elsewhere and recognition of prior learning, be it formal or informal.
(iii) Processes for securing feedback and comments from students, graduates,
employers of engineers and representatives of the wider community, and
evidence of their systematic application to the review and continuing
improvement of programme objectives, curriculum and content, and the quality of
teaching and learning. Post-programme processes should include graduate
employment data, alumni surveys documenting achievement, and employers
surveys of longer-term performance and development.
(iv) Substantial participation by practising professional engineers, and leading
employers of engineering graduates in the faculty’s forward planning and its
processes for ensuring educational quality including assessment of graduate
performance. There must be evidence of real dialogue and involvement.
(v) A process for comparing or benchmarking programme standards with those of
other universities, nationally and preferably internationally. This could be
undertaken with the use of external examiners or external advisors.
(vi) A record management system, enabling audit of the above processes at any time
and confirmation of their integrity.
- 14 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
The evaluation procedure at this stage shall comprise the following steps:
The university intending to conduct a new programme shall obtain approval from the
relevant authorities.
The university should submit the complete set of documents (refer to Section 9 and
Appendix C) to LAN/IEM for initial evaluation by EAC. The recommendation from EAC
will be forwarded to the relevant authorities.
When the documents are considered to be inadequate, the University shall be required
to provide further information before an evaluation is carried out. If the required
information is not provided within a specified period, it shall be deemed that the
university no longer intends to conduct the programme.
The report from the Panel shall be submitted to EAC within 4 weeks after the
appointment/visit.
The recommendation from EAC is specific to the programme, location and mode of
delivery. Where the same programme is offered by the university at different locations
and/or via different modes of delivery, the university shall make a fresh application.
- 15 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
The university should make an application together with complete documents (Section 9
and Appendix D) to LAN/IEM for a programme to be considered for accreditation by EAC.
For a programme that has been accredited earlier, the university should apply for re-
accreditation at least 6 months before the expiry date of the accreditation.
If the documents submitted are found to be inadequate, the university shall be required to
provide further information before an accreditation visit can be scheduled. The application
will be deemed to have been withdrawn if further information is not submitted within a
specified period.
The visit will normally extend over two days. The Panel will assess the following:
(i) the stated programme objectives;
(ii) attributes of graduating students;
(iii) the academic atmosphere in the faculty;
(iv) the quality and adequacy of the staff and students, the educational culture, and
general awareness of current developments in engineering education and
engineering practice;
(v) the university’s quality systems and processes;
(vi) the assessment procedure, and the examination of students’ work;
(vii) the facilities and their utilisation; and
(x) other related activities.
At the end of the visit, the Panel shall conduct exit discussions with the university. The
result of this discussion does not bind EAC on the outcome of the accreditation exercise.
The report and recommendation from the Panel shall be submitted to EAC within 4 weeks
after the visit.
Based on the report and recommendation of the Panel, EAC may decide on
one of the following:
- 16 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
For the degree programme that is accorded conditional accreditation, the university shall
take appropriate actions to overcome the shortcomings indicated in the report, and submit
evidence of such actions. If this is adjudged satisfactory, full accreditation may be
accorded for a period to be determined by EAC. If necessary, a further visit may be
scheduled to verify the results of the remedial action. Failure to address the shortcomings
may result in the ceasation/termination of the conditional accreditation at the end of the
stated period.
EAC’s decision shall be sent to the university, through LAN/IEM, and copies to BEM,
IEM/LAN and JPA. The accreditation will be accorded to the specific programme, location
and mode.
Where the same programme is offered by the university at different locations and/or via
different modes of delivery, the university shall apply for accreditation separately. If any of
the programme at different locations and/or via different modes of delivery fails to get
accreditation and the degree issued by the university does not make any differentiation of
the location and/or mode of delivery, EAC may take action to cease accreditation of all
such programmes by that university.
Given the strong focus on graduate outcomes, a new programme cannot be given full
accreditation until after the emergence of the first group of graduates. To provide the
faculty and its students with reasonable assurance, approval to conduct a programme
may be accorded at an earlier stage on the basis of compliance with the criteria to the
extent then possible. The process of accreditation will only be undertaken when the first
intake of students has reached the final year.
The university shall advise EAC of any change made to an accredited programme. Failure
to do so may cause EAC to cease the accreditation. EAC may direct the university to apply
for re-accreditation of the changed programme.
8.7 APPEAL
A university may appeal against a decision made by EAC. The notice of appeal must be
made in writing to the Appeal Board within two weeks of receiving the decision, stating the
basis of the appeal. Appeal documents including details are to be submitted in writing to
the Appeal Board within 4 weeks after the above notice of appeal.
- 17 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
9.1 INTRODUCTION
The university applying for accreditation must submit documents as prescribed below. It is
the responsibility of the university to provide accurate information and sufficient evidence
for the purpose of evaluation.
The documents must contain information on, but not limited to the following:
It should not be necessary to develop extensive documentation specifically for the purpose
of accreditation. The purpose of accreditation is to evaluate the systems already in place,
not to require their creation. In a well-managed university, most of the documentation
requested should already exist.
The submitted documents should be concise but of sufficient depth and detail.
The university is advised to provide accurate information as required in the manual. The
panel during the visit will audit this information.
Documentation should be bound in one or more volumes for convenience and should
include a Table of Contents with all pages numbered.
Unless otherwise stated, the university should submit 6 copies of the following:
- 18 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
- 19 -
EAC MANUAL 2003
The panel may recommend to EAC resubmission if grossly inadequate documents are
submitted by the university.
The Accreditation procedure should embrace discussions with a wide spectrum of staff
and students, accompanied by visits to all relevant laboratories, library, computing and
other facilities relevant to the programme being accredited.
10.2.2 Assessment
The assessment includes the auditing and confirmation of the report written by the
university covering such matters as:-
(a) programme aims and philosophy, structure, curricula (content, balance, coverage
of core material, etc.), appropriateness to the engineering profession in Malaysia,
content of laboratory work, project work, opportunities for non-technical subjects,
balance of lectures, tutorials, laboratories etc.;
(b) academic staff qualifications, research activities, publications, industrial
experience and contact, staff loading, motivation and enthusiasm;
(c) departmental resources and structure, financial provision, industry involvement,
accommodation, laboratory facilities and computing services;
(d) assessment procedures, level of examinations, programme work and projects;
(e) student entry standards, numbers accepted, selection procedures, involvement
with industry, employment patterns on graduation, enthusiasm and motivation;
(f) support staff (demonstrators, technicians, etc.); and
(g) quality of teaching /learning.
The panel should examine the above aspects as part of its normal quality system
procedures.
The accreditation panel report including the summary as in Appendix D must be forwarded
to EAC within four (4) weeks of the visit.
10.4 CONFIDENTIALITY
Documents or other information gained in connection with the accreditation exercise shall
be treated as confidential.
- 20 -