Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ROJECT REPORT
ON
Submitted By:-
Vishal Trivedi
MBA-III Semester
CERTIFICATE OF
Certified that Mr. Vishal Trivedi, student of Master of Business Administration, III Semester
has submitted his report on “Financial appraisal of Life care Medicos Through Ration
Analysis” after successfully completing the summer practical training at “Life Care Medicos”
from June 17th to August 1st 2010, towards fulfillment of the syllabus requirement prescribed
by Rajasthan Technical University, Kota for MBA III Semester Paper.
Rakesh Duggal
Director, PGI (FOM)
TO WHOM SO EVER IT MAY CONCERN
This is to certify that Mr. Vishal Trivedi (MBA III Semester) of Poornima Group of Institution
has joined our esteemed organization Life Care Medicos as a trainee. He has undergone a
Project Training in the guidance of Mr. Uma Shankar Vyas (Partner) from 17th June to 1st
August 2010. He has done well and completed all the criteria of a Project Training and
submitted his project on time. He was well behaved and showed complete professionalism
during the Project Training.
For completion of any project with aplomb and expertise it is essential that teamwork is
given utmost importance. In the completion of my project “Performance Appraisal of Life
Care Medicos”. I had privilege of working with experienced professional people, for which I
am grateful to the team of “Life Care Medicose” for giving me a conductive environment to
work in, which ensured maximum productivity on my part.
I would like to extend my heartful thanks to Mr. Uma Shankar Vyas (Partner, Life care
Medicos, Bikaner) for giving me an opportunity to work in Life Care Medicos as a forty-five
days trainee.
I would also like to thank my project guide Ranu mam, for their priceless help and
guidance and my parents who have helped me in this project.
I would also like to thank Rakesh Duggal (Director PGI) for this valuable inspiration.
I must also thank the management of Life Care Medicos to provide excellent opportunity
and environment to pull my project through. Cooperation of Life Care Medicos staff is also
gratefully acknowledged.
Vishal Trivedi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Undertaking a project is never an easy job for a single person. It always
involves help from other people, who are either reviewing your work or
teaching about the things you never knew before.
For completion of any project with aplomb and expertise it is essential that
teamwork is given utmost importance. In the completion of my project
“Performance Appraisal of Life Care Medicos”. I had privilege of working with
experienced professional people, for which I am grateful to the team of “Life
Care Medicose” for giving me a conductive environment to work in, which
ensured maximum productivity on my part.
I would like to extend my heartful thanks to Mr. Uma Shankar Vyas (Partner,
Life care Medicos, Bikaner) for giving me an opportunity to work in Life Care
Medicos as a forty-five days trainee.
I would also like to thank my project guide Ranu mam, for their priceless help
and guidance and my parents who have helped me in this project.
I would also like to thank Rakesh Duggal (Director PGI) for this valuable
inspiration.
I must also thank the management of Life Care Medicos to provide excellent
opportunity and environment to pull my project through. Cooperation of Life
Care Medicos staff is also gratefully acknowledged.
Preface
Executive Summary
Chapter – 1 OVERVIEW
1.1) History of Industry
1.2) Pharmaceutical Company in India
1.3) Vision & Mission
1.4) Introduction to organization
Chapter – 4 Conclusions
cha
Bibliography
PREFACE
The second chapter is project, which contains title, objective, Scope of Study
& Opportunity & Threats. The third chapter is about the facts, figures &
findings.
The fourth chapter is the ratio analysis.
The remaining chapter includes inferences drawn by me on the basis of my
observations.
Date Vishal Trivedi
CHAPTER – 1
1.1) HISTORY OF INDUSTRY
The earliest drugstores date back to the middle Ages. The first known
drugstore was opened by Arabian pharmacists in Baghdad in 754,[2] and
many more soon began operating throughout the medieval Islamic world and
eventually medieval Europe. By the 19th century, many of the drug stores in
Europe and North America had eventually developed into larger
pharmaceutical companies.
Legislation was enacted to test and approve drugs and to require appropriate
labeling. Prescription and nonprescription drugs became legally distinguished
from one another as the pharmaceutical industry matured. The industry got
underway in earnest from the 1950s, due to the development of systematic
scientific approaches, understanding of human biology (including DNA) and
sophisticated manufacturing techniques.
Numerous new drugs were developed during the 1950s and mass-produced
and marketed through the 1960s. These included the first oral contraceptive,
"The Pill", Cortisone, blood-pressure drugs and other heart medications. MAO
Inhibitors, chlorpromazine (Thomasine), Haldol (Haloperidol) and the
tranquilizers ushered in the age of psychiatric medication. Valium (diazepam),
discovered in 1960, was marketed from 1963 and rapidly became the most
prescribed drug in history, prior to controversy over dependency and
habituation.
Attempts were made to increase regulation and to limit financial links between
companies and prescribing physicians, including by the relatively new US
FDA. Such calls increased in the 1960s after the thalidomide tragedy came to
light, in which the use of a new tranquilizer in pregnant women caused severe
birth defects. In 1964, the World Medical Association issued its Declaration of
Helsinki, which set standards for clinical research and demanded that subjects
give their informed consent before enrolling in an experiment. Phamaceutical
companies became required to prove efficacy in clinical trials before
marketing drugs.
Cancer drugs were a feature of the 1970s. From 1978, India took over as the
primary center of pharmaceutical production without patent protection.[citation
needed]
The industry remained relatively small scale until the 1970s when it began to
expand at a greater rate.[citation needed] Legislation allowing for strong
patents, to cover both the process of manufacture and the specific products,
came in to force in most countries. By the mid-1980s, small biotechnology
firms were struggling for survival, which led to the formation of mutually
beneficial partnerships with large pharmaceutical companies and a host of
corporate buyouts of the smaller firms. Pharmaceutical manufacturing became
concentrated, with a few large companies holding a dominant position
throughout the world and with a few companies producing medicines within
each country.
There are now more than 200 major pharmaceutical companies, jointly said to
be more profitable than almost any other industry, and employing more
political lobbyists than any other industry. Advances in biotechnology and the
human genome project promise ever more sophisticated, and possibly more
individualized, medications
Low costs of production & R&D costs (around 70% less than their
Western counterparts).
Highly innovative scientific manpower.
Hosts of national and private laboratories.
A strong IPR regime following WTO and WIPO norms.
Mr. Naval Kishore Vyas is the original promoter of this firm. At the time of
starting of the business the firm was selling the products of the Lexus &
Cipla’s Products. Now this firm is selling the products of various companies
like Cipla, Renbaxy, Torent, Active Health Care & Lexus.
The firm has the contacts to the various Doctors, to whom the medicines are
wrote. Some of the doctors’ names are as follows:-
Other than these doctors the medicines of this firm is sold to many of the
Retailers of the Medicines and also to the doctors of the PBM.
Competitors :-
There are some names of the competitors of the firm who are wholesellers of
the medicines. They are :-
Gujrat Medicose
Shanti Medicose
Shri Medicose
Annapurna Medicose
Delux Medicose
Punjab Medicose
City Drug House
Life Care Medicos roots in Bikaner but its actionand thoughts are of the world
standard. Life Care Medicos would study the best and implement then as per
its local requirement which would in able to emerge as a strong
Pharmaceutical group in the future. It would march ahead with the times and
would reach where there are consumers.
Staff Members of the Organization :-
OBJECTIVE SCOPE
Project Title
Objective Of Study
Tools & Techniques
Opportunity & Threats
Project Title
Objective of Study
Ratio Analysis
Financial Statements of the Company.
TITLE JUSTIFICATION:
The above title is self explanatory. The study deals mainly with
studying the ratio pattern in the company with a special focus on life
care medicose.
OBJECTIVE:-
SAMPLING METHODOLOGY
SamplingTechnique:
Initially, a rough draft was prepared keeping in mind the objective of
the research. A pilot study was done in order to know the accuracy
of the Questionnaire. The final Questionnaire was arrived only after
certain important changes were done. Thus my sampling came out
to be judemental and convinent
Sampling Unit:
The respondants who were asked to fill out questionnaires are the
sampling units. These comprise of employees of MNCs, Govt.
Employees, Self Employeds etc.
Sample size:
The sample size was restricted to only 100, which comprised of
mainly peoples from different regions of Bikaner due to time
constraints.
Sampling Area :
The area of the research was Bikaner, Rajasthan.
Chapter – 3
DATA ANALYSIS
AND
INTERPRITATION
Ratio Analysis:-
Introduction
Categories of Ratios
Liquidity ratios are those which are used to measure the ability of the
firm to meet its short term obligations out of short term resources. Such ratios
highlight short term solvency of the firm. It includes the following ratios:
1. Current ratios
2. Absolute Liquidity ratio, and
3. Liquid ratio
Current Ratio
2008-09 2007-08
83492.28 143338.9
12926.24 70113
= 6.45 : 1 = 2.04 : 1
RATIO STATUS
7
6
5
RATIO
4
3
2
1
0
RATIO2008-09
2007-08
YEAR
Idle Ratio is 2: 1. Hence the Liquidity of the firm’s ratios in both years is high
then idle ratio. This indicates the sound position of the company.
Quick ratio is used as a measure of the firm’s ability to meet its current
obligations. Since bank overdraft is secured by the inventories, the other
current assets must be sufficient to meet other current liabilities. A Quick ratio
of 1 : 1 indicates highly solvent position. This ratio is called acid test ratio.
This serves as a supplement to the current ratio in analyzing liquidity.
2008-09 2007-08
83492.28-55545.54 143338.9-45932.90
12926.24 70113
= 2.1: 1 = 1.38: 1
RATIO STATUS
2.5
2
RATIO
1.5
0.5
0
RATIO2008-09
2007-08
YEAR
Idle Ratio is 1: 1. Hence the liquidity of the firm’s ratios in both years is high
then the idle ratio.
Absolute Liquid Ratio
Absolute Liquid Ratio =Current Assets – (Stock + Prepaid Exp.+Debtor & B/R)
Current Liabilities & Provisions – Bank Overdraft
This ratio indicates the immediate cash position the firm on a particular date. It
is also known as Cash Position Ratio or Super Quick Ratio. This ratio pays
more significance to liquidity at particular time, when used with other liquidity
ratio. The ideal ratio is 1: 2 or 0.5: 1.
2008-09 2007-08
= 1.58: 1 = 0.60: 1
RATIO STATUS
1.8
1.6
1.4
RATIO
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2007-08RATIO2008-09
YEAR
The Ratio express the relationship between cost of goods sold and total
assets. It is also known as Total Investment Turnover Ratio. Total assets
includes net fixed assets, current assets, and realizable Intangible assets.
Fictitious assets are not included. This measures the firm’s ability to
generate sales revenue in relation to the size of the assets. The higher
ratio indicates the effective utilization of investments in assets, while lower
assets turnover ratio indicates that the assets are not being utilized
properly as compared to Sales.
2008-09 2007-08
50394.75 70389
83492.28 154815.90
=0.60 : 1 = 0.45 : 1
RATIO STATUS
0.7
0.6
0.5
RATIO
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2007-08RATIO2008-09
YEAR
The ratio shows the relationship between net fixed assets and Cost of Goods
Sold or Sales. Long term investments are also included in fixed assets. This
ratio measures the efficiency and profit earning capacity of the firm. The high
ratio indicates intensive utilization of fixed assets, while low ratio indicates
under utilization of fixed assets.
2008-09 2007-08
50394.75 70389
0 8477
=0 = 8.30 : 1
RATIO STATUS
9
8
7
RATIO
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
RATIO2008-09
2007-08
YEAR
The firm’s Fixed Assets have been decreased from last year so it indicates
that firm is not employing money in fixed assets.
Current Assets Turnover Ratio
This ratio expresses relationship between current assets and cost of goods
sold or Sales. This ratio measures the efficiency and usefulness of current
assets. The low ratio indicates the inefficient use of current assets and less
working; high ratio indicate higher business working and efficient use of
current assets.
2008-09 2007-08
50394.75 70389
83492.28 143338.9
.
=0.60 : 1 = 0.49 : 1
RATIO STATUS
0.7
0.6
0.5
RATIO
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2007-08RATIO2008-09
YEAR
The Current Assets ratio is higher than the year in 2007-08. That means the
firm is working more efficiently by using their current assets.
This Ratio discloses the relationship between Net Working Capital and Cost of
Goods Sold or Sales. This Ratio indicates the efficiency with which working
capital is being used in the business. A high ratio shows efficient management
of working capital. While low ratio indicates low trading and inefficient use of
working capital.
Analysis of the Ratio :-
2008-09 2007-08
50394.75 70389
70566.00 73225
.
= 0.71: 1 = 0.96 : 1
RATIO STATUS
1.2
1
RATIO
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
2007-08RATIO2008-09
YEAR
The Working Capital Turnover Ratio is lower then the previous one. That
means there is a little bit inefficient use of working Capital.
Capital Turnover Ratio
Capital Employed=
Total Assets (Excluding Fictitious Assets) – Current Liabilities
2008-09 2007-08
84.00%
82.00%
80.00%
RATIO
78.00%
76.00%
74.00%
72.00%
70.00%
68.00%
66.00%
64.00%
2007-08 RATIO
2008-09
YEAR
The Capital Turnover Ratio is decreased in this year. That means the firm
goes down at somewhat level.
Profitability Ratios:-
The purpose of study and analysis of profitability ratios are to help assessing
the adequacy of profits earned by the firm and also to discover whether
profitability is increasing or declining. The profitability of the firm is the net
result of a large number of policies and decisions. The profitability ratios show
the combined effects of liquidity, asset management and debt management
on operating results. Profitability ratios are measured with reference to sales,
capital employed, total assets employed shareholders funds etc. The major
profitability ratios are as follows:-
Gross Profit Margin Ratio
Operating Ratio
Operating Profit Ratio
Net Profit Ratio
Expenses Ratio
Return on Capital Employed
Return on Shareholder’s fund
Return on Equity Capital
Return on Total Assets
This ratio clearly indicates the percentage of Gross Profit on net sales. This
ratio reveals the gross profitability of the firm. This ratio reflects the efficiency
of business and the capacity of the firm to earn profit.
Analysis of the Ratio :-
2008-09 2007-08
RATIO STATUS
49.00%
48.00%
47.00%
RATIO
46.00%
45.00%
44.00%
43.00%
42.00%
41.00%
2007-08 RATIO
2008-09
YEAR
The firm’s Gross Profit Percentage is decreased in current year against of the
previous year. That means there is less efficiency and capacity of the firm to
earn profit in current year.
Net profit ratio
2008-09 2007-08
6188.04*100 9829.90*100
50394.75 70389
.
= 12.28% = 13.97%
RATIO STATUS
14.5
14
13.5
13
Ratio
12.5
12
11.5
11
2007-08 2008-09
year
The firm’s Net Profit Percentage is decreased in current year against of the
previous year. That means there is less efficiency and capacity of the firm to
earn profit in current year.
This ratio is calculated on the basis of Profit after Tax and Total Assets. This
ratio reveals the Return on Total Assets and working efficiency of the
management. As such, if this ratio is high, the profit earning capacity of the
company is considered high. But this opinion is not strong enough since the
total assets are arranged out of creditors and owner’s fund. Hence these
profits must be considered which are obtained before deducting interest to
creditors.
2008-09 2007-08
6188.04*100 9829.90*100
83492.28 154815.90
= 7.41% = 6.35%
RATIO STATUS
7.6
7.4
7.2
7
6.8
Ratio
6.6
6.4
6.2
6
5.8
2007-08 2008-09
year
The ratio is high than the previous year. That means the profit earning
capacity of the firm is high than the previous year, and working efficiency of
the management is also high.
2008-09 2007-08
6188.04*100 9829.90*100
70566.04 84702.90
= 8.77% = 11.61%
RATIO STATUS
14.00%
12.00%
RATIO
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2007-08 2008-09
YEAR
The ratio is decreased in current year against of previous year. That means
the profitability of the firm is low than the previous year.
6. Facts and Findings
In Relligare I found
(1) Religare Securities provides ADVICE, EDUCATION, TOOLS AND EXECUTION
services for investors.
(2) Religare Securities has dedicated research teams for fundamental and technical
research
(3) employees are loyal towards the organization resulting enriched and considerable
working experience
(4) Religare Securities used modern technology for trading and investment.
(5) Relligare securities have dedicated and qualified employees.
(6) Relligare is offering best services and opportunity in every sphere.
CONCLUSION
• The idle ratio is 2:1. Hence the liquidity of the firm’s ratios in both years
is high then idle ratio. This indicates the sound position of the firm.
• The idle ratio is 1:1. Hence the liquidity of the firm’s ratios in both
years is very high then idle ratio.
• The idle ratio is 0.5:1. Hence the liquidity of the firm’s ratios in both
years is very high then idle ratio.
• Both the ratios indicate the idle capacity of the firm.
• The firm’s fixed assets have been decreased from last year so it
indicate that firm is not employing more money in fixed assets and
better utilization of funds.
• The firm’s current assets ratios have increased from last year so it
indicates the efficient use of current assets.
• The firm’s Working Capital Turnover Ratio is lower than the previous
one so it indicates the inefficient use of the Working Capital.
• The firm’s capital employed ratio is lower than previous year so it
indicates low business in this year.
• There is not more effect on the firm’s Gross Profit & Net Profit margin,
but a little decrement is noticed.
• There is somewhat decrement is noticed in both Return on total assets
ratio and Return on Capital Employed.
Suggestions:-
• Commitment should be equalized for every person.
• Improvement in the opening of De-mat & contract notice
procedure is required.
• There should be a limited number of clients under the
relationship manger. So that he can handle new as well as old
customer properly.
• Some promotional activities are required for the awareness of
the customer.
• People at young age should be encouraged to invest in stock
market.
• Seminars should be held for providing information to
prospective and present customers.
• Commitment should be equalized for every person.
• Provide the facility of free demonstrations for all.
• Improvement in the opening of De-mat & contract notice
procedure is required.
• There should be a limited number of clients under the
relationship manger. So that he can handle new as well as old
customer properly.
• Some promotional activities are required for the awareness of
the customer.
• People at young age should be encouraged to invest in stock
market.
• Seminars should be held for providing information to
prospective and present customers.
Limitations
1. Lack of access new international literature and professional practices
2. Lack of systematic management leading to duplication
3. Lack of quality of technical equipments and accessible resources
4. Lack of promotion of self-development
5. Lack of a link between theories and practices
6. Lack of necessary knowledge and skills about new learning strategies at
all levels.
7. Lack of suitable alternative model for in-service training
8. Lack of a plan for national implementation and indication of support and
commitment By the Government.
9. Lack of time.
BIBILOGRAPHY