Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

c a s e r e p o r t

Dental Impression Material:


A Rare Cause of Small-Bowel Obstruction
Lemuel Dent, MD; Analeta Peterson; Danica Pruett, MD; Derrick Beech, MD

showed nonspecific gas pattern with scant air fluid lev-


Small-bowel obstruction due to foreign bodies is unusual in els, suggesting early small-bowel obstruction or ady-
adults. Intestinal obstruction is occasionally caused by pits, namic ileus. A curvilinear density was noted projecting
bezoars, endoscopy capsules, and gastrostomy tube but- over the right lower quadrant consistent with a foreign
tons. We report a rare case of distal small-bowel obstruc- body (Figure 1). A noncontrast CT scan of the abdomen
tion due to dental impression material. Avoidance of this confirmed an elongated enhancing foreign body located
potentially life-threatening complication may be achieved in the distal small bowel (Figure 2).
by increased vigilance in accounting for all impression Additional history from the patient’s family revealed
material when dental impression trays are removed. Early that the patient had visited the dentist within the past
detection of swallowed dental material may afford endo- few days for adjustment of her dentures. The dentist
scopic removal from the stomach, thus preventing intestinal stated that a polysulfide-based impression material was
obstruction. used to fit her dentures.
She underwent emergent laparotomy to relieve the
Keywords: intestines n obstruction
obstruction and remove the foreign body. There were
J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101:1295-1296 dense adhesions from previous surgical procedures,
which made the dissection challenging. A 5-cm segment
Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery (Drs Dent, Pruett, and Beech; Ms of distal ileum containing the foreign body was slightly
Peterson), Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee. edematous without perforation or ischemia. The foreign
Corresponding Author: Lemuel Dent, MD FACS, 1005 Dr D.B. Todd Blvd, body was advanced to normal bowel and removed via a
Nashville, TN 37208 (ldent@mmc.edu).
small enterotomy followed by primary repair. The for-
eign body was a rubbery, cylindrical structure measur-
Case report ing 6.05150.8 cm and consistent with dental impression

A
67-year-old female presented to the emergency material. Postoperatively she did well, with the return of
room complaining of a 1-day history of increas- bowel function within 1 week. Her diet was slowly
ing abdominal pain, abdomen distension, and advanced, and she was discharged to home on postoper-
nausea. She stated that she had anorexia and obstipa- ative day 8.
tion, but denied fever or dysuria. Her past medical his-
tory is significant for an open cholecystectomy and a Discussion
hysterectomy. In 1999 she suffered a left cerebral vascu- To our knowledge there has been only 1 previous
lar accident with residual right-sided weakness and dys- report of small bowel obstruction due to swallowing of
arthria, but no dysphagia. She also has hypertension and dental impression material.1 The polysulfide-based den-
hyperlipidemia. Her medications included furosemide, tal impression material (Permlastic, Orange, California)
enalapril, nifedipine, simvastatin, warfarin, amantidine, used in this patient contains lead dioxide. The high con-
famotidine, sertraline, and gabepentin. centration of lead afforded good visualization on radio-
Examination revealed that she was afebrile, with blood graphic evaluation and assisted with the diagnosis.
pressure 117/61 mm Hg and pulse of 80/min. She was Intestinal complications from swallowed dental material
alert and oriented but had difficulty speaking. Her abdo- are rare. There is a report from England regarding an
men was moderately distended, and she had surgical scars appendicitis caused by a class II amalgam restoration.2 It
in the right subcostal and the lower midline regions. Bowel was thought that the amalgam obstructed the appendi-
sounds were hypoactive. She was tender in the right lower ceal orifice leading to appendicitis.
quadrant with rebound. No masses or hernias were noted. The most common causes of small-bowel obstruc-
The remainder of her exam was unremarkable. tion are postoperative adhesions, hernias, and malignant
Laboratory evaluation revealed a white blood cell tumors. Occasional causes of intestinal obstruction due
count of 9.75103/ml. Plain abdominal radiographs to foreign bodies in adults are pits,3 bezoars,4 endoscopy

JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION VOL. 101, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2009 1295
Small Bowel Obstruction

capsules,5 and gastrostomy tube internal flanges.6 Intes- of intestinal obstruction. This has been seen previously
tinal obstruction due to foreign bodies such as coins and in patients with Crohn’s disease and narrowing of the
toys are most commonly seen in children.7 terminal ileum who present with obstruction due to fruit
Most ingested foreign bodies pass through the gas- pits8 or gastrostomy tube flanges.6 The distal ileum, a
trointestinal tract without event. This patient had dense common site of small-bowel obstruction, was the loca-
adhesions from previous surgeries, thus reducing the tion of obstruction in our patient.
compliance of the terminal ileum and increasing the risk This patient’s radiographs were not impressive for
high-grade obstruction. She had minimal air-fluid levels,
and there was air in the distal colon, suggesting a partial
Figure 1. Foreign Body in Right Lower Quadrant
small-bowel obstruction. Early operation was decided
upon due to the patient’s clinical exam, which was nota-
ble for rebound tenderness in the right lower quadrant.
This strategy is supported by the literature since patients
with clinical signs such as fever leukocytosis, peritonitis,
tachycardia, metabolic acidosis and continuous pain will
have compromised bowel 45% of the time.9
Bowel obstruction is a rare but potentially life-threat-
ening consequence of swallowed dental impressions.
Patients and their dental health providers should be
warned about the potential for dislodgement and swal-
lowing of such materials. A careful inspection of the
impression trays to account for missing impression mate-
rial may identify potential ingestions. Early identification
of ingestions may permit removal via endoscopy, thus
avoiding intestinal obstruction or perforation. As the
number of older patients with dentures increases, it is
likely that more of theses cases will be seen. It is expected
that the 10% decline in edentulism over the past 3 decades
will be more than offset by the 79% increase in the adult
population older than 55.10 The development of dental
impression material that can be digested in the stomach
would help prevent this complication.
References
Figure 2. Enhancing Foreign Body in Lumen of 1. Reifsteck F. Small bowel obstruction secondary to dental impression
Distal Small Bowel material. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13(4):229-301.
2. Perkins CS. Amalgam appendicitis. Brit Dent J. 1991;171:309.
3. Verstocken A, Himpens J, Leman G. An unusual case of small bowel
obstruction. Acta Chir Belg. 1996;96(4):168-169.
4. Yau KK, Siu WT, Law BK, et al. Laparoscopic approach compared with
conventional open approach for bezoar-induced small-bowel obstruc-
tion. Arch Surg. 2005;140(10):972-975.
5. Levsky JM, MIlikow DL, Rozenblit AM, et al. Small bowel obstruction due
to an impacted endoscopy capsule. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(5):579-581.
6. Khan S, Gatt M, Petty D, et al. Intestinal obstruction after PEG tube
replacement: implications to daily clinical practice. Surg Laparosc, Endosc
& Percutan Tech. 2008;18(1):80-81.
7. Hoeveler K, Roosevelt G. Keeping an eye out for bowel obstruction.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(8):582-584.
8. Chahidi N, De Reuck M, Allee J. An unusual cause of sub-occlusion in
Crohn’s disease. Acta Chir Belg. 1995;95(1):52-54.
9. Diaz JJ, Bokhari F, Mowery NT, et al. Guidelines for management of small
bowel obstruction. J Trauma. 2008;64:1651-1664.
10. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete den-
tures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(1):5-8. n

1296 JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION VOL. 101, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2009

S-ar putea să vă placă și