Historial de Revisiones para Formatos

Numero Descripción:
FMEA (Falure Mode and Effects Analysis)

Rev. Originador Descripcion de la Revision Fecha

FORM FR 013 Rev. 00

 Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Product Part Number: Rev. Date: FMEA Number:

FMEA
S= Severity number It is a estimated impact of the failure "RPN" Values
O= Occurrence number It is a estimate that the failure will occur 1 <= <= 48 Low risk of product
D= Detection number It is a estimate of the effectiveness of the detection system 49 <= <= 284 Moderated risk
285 <= <= 1000 High risk
RPN= Risk priority number RPN= S x O x D

Process Function Potential Failure Potential Effect (s) Potential cause (s) / Current process Recommended Actions Results

Severity
Responsible and

Detect
Occur

RPN
Class
(Requirements) Mode of failure Mechanism of failure Control Actions target completion date Action taken S O D RPN

2 of 3 Form: FR 032 Rev. 00

 Severity
Effect Severity criteria Ranking
Hazardous without May endanger machine or assembly operator. Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode effects
10
warning safe operation and / or involves noncompliance with regulation. Failure will occur without warning.
Hazardous with May endanger machine or assembly operator. Very high severity ranking when a potential failure mode effects
9
warning safe operation and / or involves noncompliance with regulation. Failure will occur with warning.
Major disruption to production line. 100% of product may have to be scrapped. Item inoperable, loss of primary
Very high 8
function. Customer very dissatisfied
Minor disruption to production line. A portion of product may have to be sorted and scraped, item operable, but
high 7
at reduced level. Customer dissatisfied
Minor disruption to production line. A portion of product may have to be scraped (no sorting), item operable, but
Moderate 6
some comfort items inoperable. Customer experience discomfort
Minor disruption to production line, 100% of product may have to be reworked. Item operable, bur some comfort
Low 5
items operable at reduce level of performance. Customer experiences some dissatisfaction
Minor disruption to production line. Product may have to be sorted and a portion reworked. Minor adjustments
Very low 4
do not conform. Defect noticed by customer
Minor disruption to production line. Product may have to be reworked online, but out of station. Minor
Minor 3
adjustments do not conform. Detect noticed by average customer
Minor disruption to production line. Product may have to be reworked online, but out of station. Minor
Very minor 2
adjustments do not conform. Detect noticed by discriminating customer
None No effect 1

Occurrence Detection
Probability of failure Possible failure rates Ranking Ranking Suggested range of detection methods Insp. Types
Very High: Failure almost >1 in 2 10 10 Cannot detect or is not checked c
inevitable 1 in 3 9 9 Control is achieved with indirect or random check only c
High: Generally associated with 1 in 8 8 8 Control is achieved with visual inspection only c
processes similar to previous 1 in 20 7 7 Control is achieved with double visual inspection only c
processes that have often failed 6 Control is achieved with charting methods, such as SPC c, b
Moderate: Generally associated 1 in 80 6 Control is based on variable gauging after parts have left
with processes similar to previous 1 in 400 5 5 the station, or Go/No Go gauging performed on 100% of b
processes that have experienced 1 in 2000 4 the parts after parts have left the station
occasional failures Error detection in subsequence operations, OR gauging
Low: Isolated failures associated 4 performed on setup and first-piece check (for set-up b, a
1 in 15000 3
with similar processes causes only)
Very low: Only isolated failures Error detection in-station, or error detection in subsequent
associated with almost identical 1 in 150000 2 3 operations by multiple layers of acceptance: supply select b, a
processes install, verify. Cannot accept discrepant part.
Remote: Failure is unlikely. Error detection in-station (automatic gauging with automatic
2 b, a
No failures associated with almost 1 in 1500000 1 stop feature). Cannot pass discrepant part.
identical processes Discrepant parts cannot be made because item has been
1 a
error-proofed by process/product design
a= Error proof; b= Gauging; c= Manual

FR 032 Back Rev. 00