date intrare:

Pm ≔ 3.9
nm ≔ 1700
iT ≔ 4.2

Material roata 41CR4

HB1 ≔ 340
σHlim1 ≔ 1.8 ⋅ HB1 + 200 σHlim1 = 812

σFlim1 ≔ 0.4 ⋅ HB1 + 155 σFlim1 = 291

Rm1 ≔ 1000

Material Pinion:51CrV4

HB2 ≔ 270
σHlim2 ≔ 1.8 ⋅ HB2 + 200 σHlim2 = 686

σFlim2 ≔ 0.4 ⋅ HB2 + 155 σFlim2 = 263

Rm2 ≔ 950

Impartirea raportului de transmisie

itc1 ≔ 1.7
iT
i12 ≔ ―― i12 = 2.471
itc1
u12teoretic ≔ 2.8 STAS

Numarul de dinti:
 z1 ≔ 30

z2 ≔ z1 ⋅ u12teoretic z2 = 84

z2 ≔ 83

Raport de angrenare real al angrenajului

z2
u12 ≔ ― u12 = 2.767
z1
Verificare
u12 - u12teoretic
εu12 ≔ ―――――― ⋅ 100 εu12 = -1.19
u12teoretic

recalcularea raportului de transmitere

iT
itc2 ≔ ―― itc2 = 1.518
u12 itc ≔ itc2

Calculul turatiilor:
nm
n1 ≔ ―― n1 = 1119.841
itc2
nm
n2 ≔ ――― n2 = 404.762
itc2 ⋅ u12

Calculul puterilor
randamentului angrenajului
ηc ≔ 0.97 cu roti dintate cilindrice

ηrul ≔ 0.99 randamentul unei perechi de

rulmenti
ηtc ≔ 0.93 randamentul transmisiei prin
curele trapezoidale

P1 ≔ Pm ⋅ ηtc ⋅ 0.99 P1 = 3.591

P2 ≔ Pm ⋅ ηtc ⋅ ηc ⋅ ηrul 2 P2 = 3.448

momente torsiune pe cei doi

arbori

P1
T1 ≔ 9.55 ⋅ 10 6 ⋅ ―― T1 = 30621.725
n1

P2
T2 ≔ 9.55 ⋅ 10 6 ⋅ ―― T2 = 81356.718
n2

Calculul treptei

β≔9 ° unghiu de inclinare a danturii

pe cilindru de divizare
σn ≔ 20 ° unghiul de angrenaj de
referinta in plan normal
han ≔ 1 coeficientul inaltimii capului
de referinta

cn ≔ 0.25

ψa ≔ 0.3

Predimensionarea
angrenajului

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
1
ZE ≔ 2 ――――――――― ZE = 189.812
⎛ 1 - 0.3 2 1 - 0.3 2 ⎞
π ⋅ ⎜―――― 5
+ ―――― ⎟
⎝ 2.06 ⋅ 10 2.06 ⋅ 10 5 ⎠

Zβ ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾
cos ((β)) Zβ = 0.994 Yβ ≔ 0.93

anexa 2.9:factori inclinarii

dintilor

ZH ≔ 2.49 ⋅ Zβ = 2.475
 ZN1 ≔ 1 factorii durabilitatii pentru
solicitarea de contact
ZN2 ≔ 1 Anexa 2.14

YN1 ≔ 1

YN2 ≔ 1

ZW1 ≔ 1

Tensiunile admisibile pentru

calculul de predimensionare

Anexa 2.13

SHmin ≔ 1.2 coeficient de siguranta

minim pentru solicitarea de
contact

SFmin ≔ 1.5 coeficient de siguranta

minim pentru solicitarea de
incovoiere

σHlim1 ⋅ ZN1
σHP1 ≔ ―――― σHP1 = 676.667
SHmin

σHlim2 ⋅ ZN2
σHP2 ≔ ―――― σHP2 = 571.667
SHmin

σHP ≔ 676.667

YST ≔ 2 factorul tensiunii la

incovoiere

σFlim1 ⋅ YN1 ⋅ YST

σFP1 ≔ ―――――― σFP1 = 388 tensiuni admisibile pentru
SFmin incovoiere
σFlim1 ⋅ YN2 ⋅ YST
σFP2 ≔ ―――――― σFP2 = 388
SFmin

σFP ≔ 388
 σFP 388

Distantele axiale necesare

pentru fiecare dintre cele
doua conditii de rezistenta
Anexa 2.6

((u12 + 1)) ⋅ ψa
ψd ≔ ――――― ψd = 0.565
2

KHβ ≔ 1 + 0.1 ⋅ ψd KHβ = 1.057 factorii repartitiei sarcinii pe

latimea danturii
KHα ≔ 1.15

Zε ≔ 0.9

KA ≔ 1.25 factor de utilizare

KV ≔ 1.1 factor dinamic

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ 2
3
T1 ⋅ KA ⋅ KV ⋅ KHβ ⋅ KHα ⋅ ((ZE ⋅ ZH ⋅ Zε ⋅ Zβ))
awnecH ≔ ((u12 + 1)) ⋅ ――――――――――――――
2 ⋅ ψa ⋅ u12 ⋅ σHP 2

awnecH = 85.946

Anexa 2.6

KFβ ≔ 1.5 YSa1 ≔ 1.625 YFa1 ≔ 2.55 YSa2 ≔ 1.75

YFa2 ≔ 2.25

KFα ≔ 1.25

Yε ≔ 0.85

σFlim2 ⋅ YN2 ⋅ YST

αFP2 ≔ ―――――― αFP2 = 350.667
 αFP2 αFP2 350.667
SFmin

σFlim1 ⋅ YN2 ⋅ YST

αFP1 ≔ ―――――― αFP1 = 388
SFmin

YSa2 ⋅ YFa2
―――― = 0.011
αFP2

YSa1 ⋅ YFa1
―――― = 0.011
αFP1

3 ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛ 2 ⎞
T1 ⋅ z1 ⋅ ((u12 + 1)) ⎟
⎜―――――― ⎛ YSa2 ⋅ YFa2 ⎞
awnecF ≔ ⋅ KA ⋅ KV ⋅ KFβ ⋅ KFα ⋅ Yε ⋅ Yβ ⋅ ⎜――――⎟
⎜⎝ 2 ⋅ ψa ⋅ cos ((β)) ⎟⎠ ⎝ αFP2 ⎠

awnecF = 79.544

awnec ≔ awnecH

Calculul distantei axiale,al

modulului si al altor
elemente

2 ⋅ awnec ⋅ cos ((β))

mnnec ≔ ―――――― mnnec = 1.502
z1 + z2

mn ≔ 1.75

mn ⋅ ((z1 + z2))
a ≔ ――――― a = 100.107
2 ⋅ cos ((β))

aw ≔ 100 aw - a = -0.107 0.4 ⋅ mn = 0.7

 Unghiul de angrenare de αn ≔ 20 °
referinta in plan frontal
⎛ tan ((αn)) ⎞
αt ≔ atan ⎜―――⎟ αt = 20.229 °
⎝ cos ((β)) ⎠

Unghiul real de angrenare in

plan frontal

⎛ a ⋅ cos ((αt)) ⎞
αwt ≔ acos ⎜―――― ⎟
⎝ aw ⎠

invvαwt ≔ tan ((αwt)) - αwt

invαt ≔ tan ((αt)) - αt invαt = 0.015

Suma coeficientilor deplasarilor de profil in plan normal

((invvαwt - invαt)) ⋅ ((z1 + z2))

xt ≔ ――――――――― xt = -0.061
tan ((αn)) ⋅ 2

xt
xns ≔ ――― xns = -0.062
cos ((β))

Suma coeficientilor
deplasarilor in plan frontal

xst ≔ xns ⋅ cos ((β)) xst = -0.061

Coeficientii deplasarii de
profil in plan frontal

xns ⎛ xns ⎞ log ((u12 , 2))

xn1 ≔ ―― + ⎜0.5 - ―― ⎟ ⋅ ――――――― xn1 = 0.133
2 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎛ z1 ⋅ z2 ⎞
log ⎜――――― 6
, 2⎟
⎜⎝ 100 ⋅ cos (β) ⎟⎠
 xn2 ≔ xns - xn1 xn2 = -0.195

Coeficientul de modificare a distantei axiale in plan normal

aw - a
yn ≔ ―――
mn yn = -0.061

Scurtarea specifica a
intaltimii dintelor ,in plan
normal

∆yn ≔ xn1 + xn2 - yn ∆yn = -0.001

Dimensionarea si verificarea angrenajului

Modulul danturii in plan frontal:

mn
mt ≔ ――― = 1.772
cos ((β))

Unghiul de inclinare al danturii pe cercul de baza:

βb ≔ atan ((cos ((αt)) ⋅ tan ((β)))) = 8.453 °

Diametrele cercurilor de divizare:

mn ⋅ z1 z2
d1 ≔ ――― = 53.1544 d2 ≔ mn ⋅ ――― = 147.0606
cos ((β)) cos ((β))
Diametrele cercurilor de baza:

db1 ≔ d1 ⋅ cos ((αt)) = 49.8757 db2 ≔ d2 ⋅ cos ((αt)) = 137.9894

Diametrele cercurilor de rostogolire:

cos ((αt)) cos ((αt))
dw1 ≔ d1 ⋅ ―――― = 53.0973 dw2 ≔ d2 ⋅ ―――― = 146.9027
cos ((αwt)) cos ((αwt))

Diametrele cercurilor de cap:

han ≔ 1 cn ≔ 0.25
⎛ mn ⎞
da1 ≔ ⎜――― ⋅ ⎛⎝z1 + 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝han + xn1 - ∆yn⎞⎠ ⋅ cos ((β))⎞⎠⎟ = 57.1228
⎝ cos ((β)) ⎠

⎛ mn ⎞
da2 ≔ ⎜――― ⋅ ⎛⎝z2 + 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝han + xn1 - ∆yn⎞⎠ ⋅ cos ((β))⎞⎠⎟ = 151.0289
⎝ cos ((β)) ⎠

Diametrele cercurilor de picior:

⎛ z1 ⎞
df1 ≔ mn ⋅ ⎜――― - 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝han + cn - xn1⎞⎠⎟ = 49.246
⎝ cos ((β)) ⎠

⎛ z2 ⎞
df2 ≔ mn ⋅ ⎜――― - 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝han + cn - xn2⎞⎠⎟ = 142.0022
⎝ cos ((β)) ⎠

⎛ da1 ⎞
βa1 ≔ atan ⎜―― ⋅ tan ((β))⎟ = 9.6597 deg
⎝ d1 ⎠
⎛ da2 ⎞
βa2 ≔ atan ⎜―― ⋅ tan ((β))⎟ = 9.2387 deg
⎝ d2 ⎠
⎛ d1 ⎞
αat1 ≔ acos ⎜―― ⋅ cos ((αt))⎟ = 29.1755 deg
⎝ da1 ⎠
⎛ d2 ⎞
αat2 ≔ acos ⎜―― ⋅ cos ((αt))⎟ = 23.9836 deg
⎝ da2 ⎠
 Grosimile dintilor pe cercul de divizare in plan frontal

((0.5 ⋅ π + 2 ⋅ xn1 ⋅ tan ((αt)) ⋅ cos ((β)))) ⋅ mn

st1 ≔ ――――――――――――= 2.955
cos ((β))

((0.5 ⋅ π + 2 ⋅ xn2 ⋅ tan ((αt)) ⋅ cos ((β)))) ⋅ mn

st2 ≔ ――――――――――――= 2.531
cos ((β))

Grosimile dintilor pe cercul de cap in plan normal

invαat1 ≔ tan ⎛⎝αat1⎞⎠ - αat1 = 0.049

invαat2 ≔ tan ⎛⎝αat2⎞⎠ - αat2 = 0.026

⎛ mn ⋅ z1 ⎞ cos ((αt))
san1 ≔ ⎜⎛⎝invαt - invαat1⎞⎠ ⋅ ――― + st1⎟ ⋅ ――― ⋅ cos ⎛⎝βa1⎞⎠ = 1.235
⎝ cos ((β)) ⎠ cos ⎛⎝αat1⎞⎠

⎛ mn ⋅ z2 ⎞ cos ((αt))
san2 ≔ ⎜⎛⎝invαt - invαat2⎞⎠ ⋅ ――― + st2⎟ ⋅ ――― ⋅ cos ⎛⎝βa2⎞⎠ = 0.948
⎝ cos ((β)) ⎠ cos ⎛⎝αat2⎞⎠

Inaltimea dintelui

h ≔ mn ⋅ ⎛⎝2 ⋅ han + cn - ∆yn⎞⎠ = 3.938

b2 ≔ ψa ⋅ aw = 30 b1 ≔ b2 + 3 = 33

Calculul gradului de acoperire

Gradul de acoperire in plan frontal

⎛ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ da2 2 - db2 2 - 2 ⋅ aw ⋅ sin ((αwt)) ⎞
da1 2 - db1 2 + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎜
εα ≔ ――――――――――――――― ⎟ ⋅ cos ((β)) = 1.975
⎜⎝ 2 ⋅ π ⋅ mn ⋅ cos ((αt)) ⎟⎠

Gradul de acoperire suplimentar (axial)

b2 ⋅ sin ((β))
εβ ≔ ―――― = 0.854
π ⋅ mn
 Gradul de acoperire total

εγ ≔ εα + εβ = 2.829

Elementele angrenajului echivalent

Diametrele cercurilor de divizare ale rotilor echivalente

z1 z2
zn1 ≔ ―――――― 2
= 31.045 zn2 ≔ ―――――― 2
= 85.891
⎛⎝cos ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠⎞⎠ ⋅ cos (β) ⎛⎝cos ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠⎞⎠ ⋅ cos (β)

dn1 ≔ mn ⋅ zn1 = 54.328 dn2 ≔ mn ⋅ zn2 = 150.309

Diametrele cercurilor de baza are rotilor echivalente

dbn1 ≔ dn1 ⋅ cos ((αn)) = 51.052 dbn2 ≔ dn2 ⋅ cos ((αn)) = 141.244

Diametrele cercurilor de cap are rotilor echivalente

dan1 ≔ dn1 + da1 - d1 = 58.297 dan2 ≔ dn2 + da2 - d2 = 154.277

Numarul de dinti ai rotilor echivalente

Unghiul de presiune al angrenajului echivalent

⎛ db1 ⎞ ⎛ dw1 ⎞
βb ≔ atan ⎜―― ⋅ tan ((β))⎟ = 8.453 ° βw ≔ atan ⎜―― ⋅ tan ((β))⎟ = 8.99 deg
⎝ d1 ⎠ ⎝ d1 ⎠

⎛ cos ((αwt)) ⋅ cos ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠ ⎞

αwn ≔ acos ⎜――――――⎟ = 19.834 deg
⎝ cos ⎛⎝βw⎞⎠ ⎠
 Distanta dintre axe a angrenajului echivalent

a cos ((αn))
awn ≔ ―――― ⋅ ――― = 102.506
2
cos ⎛⎝αwn⎞⎠
⎛⎝cos ⎛⎝βw⎞⎠⎞⎠

Gradul de acoperire al angrenajului echivalent

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
dan1 2 - dbn1 2 + ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
dan2 2 - dbn2 2 - 2 ⋅ awn ⋅ sin ⎛⎝αwn⎞⎠
εαn ≔ ―――――――――――――――― = 1.998
2 ⋅ π ⋅ mn ⋅ cos ((αn))

Elemente de control

z1 αn
N1 ≔ ―――――― ⋅ ―― + 0.5 = 3.949
2
⎛⎝cos ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠⎞⎠ ⋅ cos (β) 180 °

z2 αn
N2 ≔ ―――――― ⋅ ――+ 0.5 = 10.043
⎛⎝cos ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠⎞⎠ ⋅ cos (β) 180 °
2

N1 ≔ 4 N2 ≔ 10

Cotele peste dinti in planul normal sunt

WNn1 ≔ 2 ⋅ xn1 ⋅ mn ⋅ sin ((αn)) + mn ⋅ cos ((αn)) ⋅ ⎛⎝⎛⎝N1 - 0.5⎞⎠ ⋅ π + z1 ⋅ invαt⎞⎠ = 19.003

WNn2 ≔ 2 ⋅ xn2 ⋅ mn ⋅ sin ((αn)) + mn ⋅ cos ((αn)) ⋅ ⎛⎝⎛⎝N2 - 0.5⎞⎠ ⋅ π + z2 ⋅ invαt⎞⎠ = 50.953

Coarda constanta si inaltimea la coarda constanta:

⎛ 2 ⎞
scn1 ≔ mn ⋅ ⎝0.5 ⋅ π ⋅ ((cos ((αn)))) + xn1 ⋅ sin ((2 αn))⎠ = 2.577
⎛ 2 ⎞
scn2 ≔ mn ⋅ ⎝0.5 ⋅ π ⋅ ((cos ((αn)))) + xn2 ⋅ sin ((2 αn))⎠ = 2.208
 hcn1 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝da1 - d1 - scn1 ⋅ tan ((αn))⎞⎠ = 1.515

hcn2 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝da2 - d2 - scn2 ⋅ tan ((αn))⎞⎠ = 1.582

Verificarea restrictiilor functional-constructive si de control

εα = 1.975 1.3 < 1.975 < 2

san1 = 1.235 > 0.25 ⋅ mn = 0.438

san2 = 0.948 > 0.25 ⋅ mn = 0.438

14 - zn1 14 - zn2
xn1min ≔ ――― = -1.003 xn2min ≔ ――― = -4.229
17 17
xn1 = 0.1333 xn2 = -0.195

WNn1 = 19.003 WNn2 = 50.953

⎛⎝b1 - 5⎞⎠ ⎛⎝b2 - 5⎞⎠
――― = 190.476 ――― = 170.068
sin ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠ sin ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠

Verificarea angrenajului
mn = 1.75
π ⋅ dw1 ⋅ n1
v ≔ ―――― = 3.113 [m/s]
60000

Clasa de precizie :8; danturare prin frezare cu freza melc,

Ra1,2=0.8 pentru flanc

Ra1,2=1.6 pentru zona de racordare

 Tip lubrifiant : TIN 125
EP STAS 10588-76
avand vascozitatea
cinematica 125-140
mm2/s (cSt)

β
Yβ ≔ 1 - εβ ⋅ ―――= 0.936 εβ = 0.854
120 deg

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
2 ⋅ cos ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠
ZH ≔ ―――――――― 1
= 2.478
(sin (αwt)) ⋅ cos (αwt)

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛⎝4 - εα⎞⎠ εβ
Zε ≔ ――― ⋅ ⎛⎝1 - εβ⎞⎠ + ― = 0.729
3 εα

0.75
Yε ≔ 0.25 + ―― = 0.625
εαn

Reatribuire valori:

KA ≔ 1 -factor de utilizare
((v ⋅ z1))
KV ≔ 1.2 - factor dinamic v = 3.113 z1 = 30 ――― = 0.934
100
((2 ⋅ T1)) ⎛⎝KA ⋅ Ft1⎞⎠
Ft1 ≔ ――― = 1153.418 ――― = 38.447
dw1 b2
εα
εαn ≔ ――― 2
= 2.019
KHα ≔ 1.72 KFα ≔ 1.72 cos ⎛⎝βb⎞⎠
 xn1 = 0.133 xn2 = -0.195

z1 = 30 z2 = 83

YSa1 ≔ 1.68 YSa2 ≔ 1.66

YFa1 ≔ 2.45 YFa2 ≔ 2.33

χ1 ≔ 1 χ2 ≔ 1 Lh ≔ 8000 ore

Nr. cicluri de solicitare:

NL1 ≔ 60 ⋅ n1 ⋅ Lh ⋅ χ1 = 537523809.524
=> ZN1 ≔ 1 YN1 ≔ 1

NL2 ≔ 60 ⋅ n2 ⋅ Lh ⋅ χ2 = 194285714.286
=> ZN2 ≔ 1 YN2 ≔ 1

Calculul elementelor care trebuie verificate

Tensiunea efectiva maxima de contact

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ 3
T1 ⋅ KA ⋅ KV ⋅ KHβ ⋅ KHα ((u12 + 1)) ⎛⎝ZE ⋅ ZH ⋅ Zε ⋅ Zβ⎞⎠
σH ≔ ―――――――― ⋅ ―――― ⋅ ―――――― = 499.397
2 ⋅ b2 u12 aw

2
T1 ⋅ z1 ⋅ ((u12 + 1)) ⋅ ⎛⎝KA ⋅ KV ⋅ KFβ ⋅ KFα⎞⎠ ⋅ Yε ⋅ Yβ ⋅ YFa1 ⋅ YSa1
σF1 ≔ ―――――――――――――――――― = 149.127
2 ⋅ b1 ⋅ aw 2 ⋅ cos (β)

2
T1 ⋅ z1 ⋅ ((u12 + 1)) ⋅ ⎛⎝KA ⋅ KV ⋅ KFβ ⋅ KFα⎞⎠ ⋅ Yε ⋅ Yβ ⋅ YFa2 ⋅ YSa2
σF2 ≔ ―――――――――――――――――― = 154.148
2 ⋅ b2 ⋅ aw 2 ⋅ cos (β)

ZL ≔ 1.03 ZV ≔ 1 ZR ≔ 1.01 ZW ≔ 1.07

 σHlim1
SH1 ≔ ――― ⋅ ZN1 ⋅ ZL ⋅ ZR ⋅ ZV ⋅ ZW SH1 = 1.81
σH

σHlim2
SH2 ≔ ――― ⋅ ZN1 ⋅ ZL ⋅ ZR ⋅ ZV ⋅ ZW SH2 = 1.529
σH

YR1 ≔ 1.02 YR2 ≔ 1.02 Yδ1 ≔ 1 Yδ2 ≔ 1.02 Yx1 ≔ 1 Yx2 ≔ 1

SHmin ≔ 1.62 SFmin ≔ 6.146

σFlim1 ⋅ YST ⋅ YN1 ⋅ Yδ1 ⋅ YR1 ⋅ Yx1

SF1 ≔ ――――――――――= 3.981
σF1

σFlim2 ⋅ YST ⋅ YN2 ⋅ Yδ2 ⋅ YR2 ⋅ Yx2

SF2 ≔ ――――――――――= 3.55
σF2
Calculul fortelor din angrenaj

Forte tangentiale:
2 ⋅ T1
Ft1 ≔ ――= 1153.418
dw1
Ft2 ≔ Ft1 = 1153.418

Forte radiale:

Fr1 ≔ Ft1 ⋅ αwt = 403.855

Fr2 ≔ Fr1 = 403.855

Forte axiale:

Fa1 ≔ Ft1 ⋅ tan ⎛⎝βw⎞⎠ = 182.487

Fa2 ≔ Fa1 = 182.487

Forte normale

Fn1 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
Ft1 2 + Fr1 2 + Fa1 2 = 1235.627

Fn2 ≔ Fn1 = 1235.627

Proiectarea formei
constructive a rotilor dintate

δ≔8 d ≔ 40 dc ≔ 1.6 ⋅ d = 64 d4 ≔ 45

δ1 ≔ 1.1 ⋅ δ = 8.8 di ≔ df2 - 2 ⋅ δ = 126.002

dg ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝di + dc⎞⎠ = 95.001
δ2 ≔ 0.25 ⋅ b2 = 7.5

di - dc
l ≔ 1.5 ⋅ d = 60 b2 = 30 m≔2 do ≔ ――― = 17.715
3.5
Pana pe care se asambleaza roata:

b2 ≔ 10

h2 ≔ 8

t12 ≔ 5 t22 ≔ 3.3 l2 ≔ 40

 Proiectarea arborelui de
intrare E335

Rmetalon ≔ 550 MPa Rm ≔ 600

Rmetalon
Tc1 ≔ T1 ⋅ ――― = 28069.915 [[ N ⋅ m ]] dc1 ≔ 22 lc1 ≔ 50
Rm
de1 ≔ 1.2 ⋅ dc1 = 26.4 T1 = 30621.725 de1 ≔ 28

Dm ≔ 47 Bm ≔ 7 de1 ≔ 22

ls1 ≔ 10 mm

Pinionul se monteaza cu ajutorul unei pene:

b≔8 h≔7 t1 ≔ 4 t2 ≔ 3.3 l ≔ 22

Rulmenti radiali-axiali cu role conice montati in X: 30206

dr1 ≔ 30 a1 ≔ 15
Dr1 ≔ 62 C1 ≔ 44
b1 ≔ 16 e1 ≔ 0.37
c1 ≔ 14 Y1 ≔ 1.6
B1 ≔ 17.25

D ≔ 62 da1 = 57.123

Bm ≔ 7
Montarea rotii de curea pe capatul de arbore se realizeaza printr-o asamblare cu pana.
Dimensiuni pana paralela (STAS 1004):

b≔5 h≔5
t1 ≔ 3 l ≔ 22

t2 ≔ 2.3 D = 62

Capac pentru rulmenti :

D3 ≔ 0.9 ⋅ D = 55.8
mm dc
d1 ≔ 6 mm

e1 ≔ 5 mm
e2 ≔ 2 mm lm ≔ 2 mm
lp ≔ 4 mm

da ≔ de1 + 3 = 25 mm

da1 - df1
―――= 3.938
2

unde: D - diametrul alezajului

ds - diametrul suruburilor de fixare a capacului

de1 = 22 le ≔ 26
lc1
l1 ≔ ―+ le + 14 = 65
2
ls4 ≔ 10 mm
b1 b1
l2 ≔ ((b - a)) + ls4 + ―= -77.107 l3 ≔ ―+ ls4 + ((b - a)) = -77.107
2 2
Proiectarea arborelui de iesire

Material: 1C45 Rm ≔ 720

Rmetalon
Tc2 ≔ T2 ⋅ ――― Tc2 = 62147.493 [N*m]
Rm
dc2 ≔ 28 lc2 ≔ 60

de2 ≔ 1.15 ⋅ dc2 = 32.2

de2 ≔ 32

Dm ≔ 45
Bm ≔ 8 lbutuc ≔ 1.5 ⋅ de2 = 48

Rulmenti pt. arborele de iesire:30207 d2 ≔ 4 ds ≔ 6 D ≔ 72

dr2 ≔ 35 Capac pentru rulment :

Dr2 ≔ 72 D1 ≔ D + 2.5 ⋅ ds = 87
b2 ≔ 17 D2 ≔ D1 + 2.5 ⋅ ds = 102
c2 ≔ 15 D3 ≔ 0.9 ⋅ 62 = 55.8
B2 ≔ 18.25 e ≔ 1.2 ⋅ ds = 7.2 mm
a2 ≔ 15 d1 ≔ ds + 2 = 8 mm
C2 ≔ 54 D4 ≔ D1 - 3 ⋅ ds = 69
e2 ≔ 0.37 e1 ≔ 5 mm
Y2 ≔ 1.6 e2 ≔ 2 mm
d4 ≔ dr2 + 5 = 40 lp ≔ 4 mm
da ≔ de2 + 3 = 35 mm
df1 = 49.246
l4 ≔ lbutuc - 4 = 44

l4 ≔ lbutuc - 4 = 44
m=2
Db ≔ D + 4 ⋅ ds + 4 = 100 T1 = 30621.725
lm ≔ 2
unde: D - diametrul alezajului

ds - diametrul suruburilor de fixare a capacului

Calculul reactiunilor si
momentelor incovaietoare

Arborele de intrare
a)Calculul reactiunilor :

in plan orizontal:

dw1
Fr1 ⋅ l2 - Fa1 ⋅ ―― - S ⋅ l1 S ≔ 1043.2
2
H2 ≔ ―――――――― = 673.041
2 ⋅ l2

dw1
S ⋅ ⎛⎝l1 + 2 + l2⎞⎠ + Fr1 ⋅ l2 + Fa1 ⋅ ――
2
H1 ≔ ―――――――――― = 238.885
2 ⋅ l2

in plan vertical:
Ft1
V2 ≔ ―― = 576.709
2
Ft1
V1 ≔ ―― = 576.709
2
unde: dw1 - diametrul cilindrului de divizare al pinionului cilindric
l1 l2 - rezulta din modul in care a fost proiectat arborele

Reactiunile rezultate:

FR1 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
H1 2 + V1 2 = 624.227 FR2 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
H2 2 + V2 2 = 886.328
b)Calculul momentelor incovoietoare:

in plan orizontal:
MiH2 ≔ S ⋅ l1 = 67808
MiH31 ≔ S ⋅ ⎛⎝l1 + l2⎞⎠ - H1 ⋅ l2 = 5789.266
MiH32 ≔ -H2 ⋅ l3 = 51896.529

in plan vertical:

MiV3 ≔ -V1 ⋅ l2 = 44468.595

Arborele de iesire din reductor

a)Calculul reactiunilor :
in plan orizontal:

dw2 dw2
Fr2 ⋅ l3 + Fa2 ⋅ ―― Fr2 ⋅ l3 - Fa2 ⋅ ――
2 2
H4 ≔ ―――――― = 115.01 H3 ≔ ―――――― = 288.845
2 ⋅ l3 2 ⋅ l3
in plan vertical:
Ft2 Ft2
V4 ≔ ―― = 576.709 V3 ≔ ―― = 576.709
2 2

Reactiunile rezultate :

FR3 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
H3 2 + V3 2 = 645

FR4 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
H4 2 + V4 2 = 588.065

b)Calculul momentelor incovoietoare :

in plan orizontal:
MiH21 ≔ H3 ⋅ l3 = -22272.1
MiH22 ≔ H4 ⋅ l3 = -8868.162

in plan orizontal:
MiV2 ≔ V3 ⋅ l3 = -44468.595
Proiectarea transmisiei prin
curele trapezoidale

Dp1 ≔ 63 itc = 1.518

Dp2 ≔ itc ⋅ Dp1 Dp2 = 95.639 - diametrul primitiv al rotii mari

Distanta preliminara dintre axe :

0.7 ⋅ ⎛⎝Dp1 + Dp2⎞⎠ ≤ Ap ≤ 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝Dp1 + Dp2⎞⎠

0.7 ⋅ ⎛⎝Dp1 + Dp2⎞⎠ = 111.047 2 ⋅ ⎛⎝Dp1 + Dp2⎞⎠ = 317.277

119.017 ≤ Ap ≤ 340.048 Ap ≔ 250

Unghiul dinre ramurile curelei:

⎛ Dp2 - Dp1 ⎞
γ ≔ 2 ⋅ asin ⎜―――⎟ γ = 7.486 °
⎝ 2 ⋅ Ap ⎠
Unghiul de infasurare pe roata mica de curea:

β1 ≔ 180 - 7.5482 β1 = 172.452

Lungimea primitiva a curelei:

2
⎛⎝Dp2 - Dp1⎞⎠
Lp ≔ 2 ⋅ Ap + π ⋅ Dm + ―――― = 642.437
4 ⋅ Ap

Lp = 642.4369 => L ≔ 630 mm cL ≔ 0.82

Distanta reala dintre axe:

p ≔ 0.25 ⋅ L - 0.393 ⋅ ⎛⎝Dp1 + Dp2⎞⎠ p = 95.155

2
q ≔ 0.125 ⋅ ⎛⎝Dp2 - Dp1⎞⎠ q = 133.159

A ≔ p + ‾‾‾‾‾
p2 - q A = 189.608
 p+ p q 189.608

Viteza periferica a curelei:

π ⋅ Dp1 ⋅ nm
v ≔ ―――― v = 5.608 m/s
60 ⋅ 1000

Numarul preliminar de curele:

Dp2 - Dp1
cf ≔ 1 , 2 ‥ 1.3 cf ≔ 1.3 ―――― = 0.086
2⋅A
cβ ≔ 0.99

nm = 1700 itc = 1.518 P0 ≔ 1.25

cf ⋅ Pm
z0 ≔ ――― z0 = 4.996
cL ⋅ cβ ⋅ P0

Numarul de curele:
z0
cz ≔ 0.90 z≔― z = 5.551 z≔5
cz
Frecventa incovoierilor curelei:
v
f ≔ 2 ⋅ ―⋅ 10 3 f = 17.802 [[ Hz ]]
L
Forta periferica transmisa:
Pm
F ≔ 10 3 ⋅ ―― F = 695.467
v
Forta de intindere a curelei:
S ≔ 1,5‥2 ⋅ F S ≔ 1.5 ⋅ F = 1043.2

Cotele de modificare a distantei dintre axe, necesare montarii curelei pe roti, respectiv
intinderii ei :
X ≥ 0.03 ⋅ L X ≥ 18.9

Y ≥ 0.015 ⋅ L Y ≥ 9.45
Proiectarea formei rotii de curea:
material: fonta
lp ≔ 8.5
m≔9
e ≔ 12
n ≔ 2.5
f≔8
r ≔ 0.5
α ≔ 34 deg

De ≔ Dp1 + 2 ⋅ n De = 68

dc ≔ 1.6 ⋅ d dc = 64

B ≔ 2 ⋅ f + ((z - 1)) ⋅ e B = 64

δ≥m+n δ=8
δ1
δ1 ≔ 1.1 ⋅ δ δ1 = 8.8 δ ≔ ―― =8
1.1
dcurea ≔ 16 dc ≔ 1.6 ⋅ dcurea = 25.6 dc = 25.6

di ≔ Dp2 - 2 ⋅ m - 2 ⋅ δ di = 61.639 lc ≔ 28

l ≔ lc + 3 l = 31 l≥B
di - dc
dg ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ⎛⎝di + dc⎞⎠ dg = 43.619 d0 ≔ ――― = 10.297
3.5
Verificarea arborilor:

a)la solicitari compuse

a) arborele de intrare

Mi3 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
MiH31 2 + MiV3 2 = 44843.8574
σai1 ≔ 90 σai ≔ 330
π ⋅ df1 3
Wz ≔ ――― = 11724.991
32
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ 2
Mi3 2 + ((α ⋅ T1))
σech3 ≔ ――――――= 4.127 σech ≤ σai1
Wz

unde: df1 - diametrul de picior al melcului

Mi3 - momentul incovoietor rezultant
T1 - momentul de torsiune pe arbore

b)arborele de iesire:

Mi2 ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
MiH22 2 + MiV2 2 = 45344.2415

2
π ⋅ d4 3 b2 ⋅ t2 ⋅ ⎛⎝d4 - t2⎞⎠
Wz ≔ ――― - ―――――= 5588.5298
32 2 ⋅ d4

‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ 2
Mi2 2 + ((α ⋅ T2))
σech2 ≔ ――――――= 11.8517 σech2 ≤ σai1
Wz
unde: d4 - diametrul arborelui
b,t- dimensiunile canalului de pana

Verificarea penelor

Asamblarea cu pana se verifica la strivire si forfecare:

a)Verificarea la strivire:
pana - arbore de intrare(roata h≔5 b≔5 dc ≔ 16 l ≔ 28
de curea)
lc ≔ l - b = 23
 lc l b 23
4 ⋅ T1
σs1 ≔ ――― = 66.569
h ⋅ lc ⋅ dc

pana - arbore de intrare(pinion) h≔7 b≔8 dc ≔ 26 l ≔ 22

4 ⋅ T1
lc ≔ l - b = 14 σs1 ≔ ――― = 48.072
h ⋅ lc ⋅ dc

pana - arbore de iesire b2 ≔ 10 l2 ≔ 42 h2 ≔ 8

lc2 ≔ l2 - b2 = 32
4 ⋅ T2
σs2 ≔ ――― = 31.78
h2 ⋅ lc2 ⋅ d4
b) Verificare la forfecare
2 ⋅ T1 2 ⋅ T2
τf ≔ ――― = 13.384 τf ≔ ―――= 9.685
b ⋅ l ⋅ dc b2 ⋅ l2 ⋅ d4

CALCULUL DE
VERIFICARE A
RULMENTILOR

Rulmentii s-au ales la proiectarea constructiva a arborilor. Ei se verifica la durabilitate. Un

rulment trebuie sa aiba o durabilitate efectiva cel putin egala cu durabilitatea necesara.

Lh ≥ Lhnec Lhnec ≔ 20000 [[ hr ]]

unde: Lhnec - durabilitatea necesara exprimata in ore de functionare

10
C1 ≔ 44000 p≔― fk ≔ 1.2 fs ≔ 1.4 C2 ≔ 54000
3
fd ≔ fk ⋅ fs = 1.68 Pec ≔ fd ⋅ P1 = 6.032

a)pt arbore de intrare Y ≔ 1.71

FR1 FR2
F'A1 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ―― = 182.523 F'A2 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ―― = 259.16
Y Y
FA1 ≔ F'A1 = 182.523
FA2 ≔ F'A1 - Fa1 = 0.035
Rulmentul 1:
Rulmentul 1:
FA1 Fa1
―― = 0.292 ―― ≤e Pe1 ≔ FR1 = 624.227
FR1 FR1

Rulmentul 2:
FA2 Fa2
―― =0 ―― ≤e Pe2 ≔ FR2 = 886.328
FR2 FR2
b)pt arbore de iesire Y ≔ 1.6

FR3 FR4
F'A3 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ―― = 201.562 F'A4 ≔ 0.5 ⋅ ―― = 183.77
Y Y
Fa2 + F'A3 = 384.05 Fa2 + F'A3 < F'A4 FA3 ≔ F'A4 - Fa2 = 1.283

Rulmentul 3: FA4 ≔ F'A4

FA3 FA3
―― = 0.002 ―― ≤e Pe3 ≔ FR3 = 645
FR3 FR3
Rulmentul 4:
FA4 FA4
―― = 0.313 ―― ≤e Pe4 ≔ FR4 = 588.065
FR4 FR4
Pec1 ≔ fd ⋅ Pe1 Pec1 = 1048.701
unde: fd - coeficient dinamic
⎛ C1 ⎞ p Pec2 ≔ fd ⋅ Pe2 Pec2 = 1489.032
10 6
Lh1 ≔ ――― ⋅ ⎜―― ⎟
60 ⋅ n1 ⎝ Pec1 ⎠
Lh1 = 3819692.7919
⎛ C1 ⎞ p Pec3 ≔ fd ⋅ Pe3
10 6
Lh2 ≔ ――― ⋅ ⎜―― ⎟ Lh2 = 1187192.916
60 ⋅ n1 ⎝ Pec2 ⎠
Pec4 ≔ fd ⋅ Pe4

10 6 ⎛ C2 ⎞ p

Lh3 ≔ ――― ⋅ ⎜―― ⎟ Lh3 = 18752767.13

60 ⋅ n2 ⎝ Pec3 ⎠

10 6 ⎛ C2 ⎞ p
Lh4 ≔ ――― ⋅ ⎜―― ⎟ Lh4 = 25517930.419
60 ⋅ n2 ⎝ Pec4 ⎠
 unde: C - sarcina dinamica de baza a rulmentului
Pec - sarcina dinamica echivalenta corectata(de calcul)
p - exponent cu valoarea 3 pentru rulment cu bile si 10/3 pentru cei cu
role
n - turatia arborelui

lbutuc = 48

Proiectarea carcasei si
accesorilor acesteia

Proiectarea carcasei

Grosimea peretilor carcasei:

s ≔ 0.06 ⋅ aw = 6 mm s≥5
 Grosimea fundului carcasei:

s0 ≔ 1.2 ⋅ s = 7.2 mm

Grosimea nervurilor carcasei inferioare:

s1 ≔ 0.8 ⋅ s = 4.8 mm

Dimensiunea talpii reductorului:

s2 ≔ 2.2 ⋅ s = 13.2 mm δ ≔ 0.5 ⋅ s = 3 mm

Grosimea flansei carcasei carcasei inferioare

mm
s3 ≔ 1.5 ⋅ s = 9

Grosimea carcasei superioare:

s4 ≔ 0.8 ⋅ s = 4.8 mm

Grosimea nervurilor carcasei superioare:

s5 ≔ 0.85 ⋅ s4 = 4.08 mm

Grosimea flansei carcasei superioare

s6 ≔ 1.5 ⋅ s4 = 7.2 mm

s6 ≔ 1.5 ⋅ s4 = 7.2 mm

Distanta minima de la rotile dintate la peretii carcasei:

∆ ≔ 1.2 ⋅ s = 7.2 ∆ ≔ 8 mm
δ1 ≔ 35 mm δ2 ≔ 3 mm
δ3 ≔ 2 ⋅ s3 = 18 mm δ4 ≔ 2 ⋅ s6 = 14.4 mm

Suruburi de fixare: aw = 100

 M10 d ≔ 10 dg ≔ 11 d' ≔ 8 ((M8)) d'g ≔ 9

Latimea flansei:
k ≔ 2.7 ⋅ d' = 21.6 mm
c ≔ 0.5 ⋅ k = 10.8 mm

Stift de pozitionare
dst ≔ 0.7 ⋅ d' = 5.6 mm
d≔6 mm r≔6 mm
f ≔ 1.1 ⋅ dg = 12.1 h≔3 mm

l ≔ 20 mm

Indicator de nivel de ulei k≔6

1
H1 ≔ ―⋅ ⎛⎝da2 - 0.95 ⋅ df2⎞⎠ + δ1 = 43.063
2
da2
H2 ≔ ―― + δ1 = 60.171
k

π ⋅ dw2 ⋅ n2
v2 ≔ ―――― = 3.113
60000
 Capac de vizitare: Aerisitor
a ≔ 80

b ≔ 100

c ≔ 96

e ≔ 116

l1 ≔ 70

h≔3

1.7. VERIFICAREA REDUCTOARELOR LA INCALZIRE

Reductorul trebuie sa aiba o temperatura de regim "t" sub cea admisibila. Cantitata de
caldura rezultata prin frecare sa fie egala cu cantitatea de caldura evacuata, care reprezinta o
energie.
Raportand energia la timp, se obtine egalitatea puterilor:

Pf = Pe
sau
P1 ⋅ ((1 - η)) ⋅ 10 3 = λ ⋅ ((1 + ψ)) ⋅ S ⋅ ⎛⎝t - t0⎞⎠

unde: P1 -puterea la arborele de intrare [kW]

η -randamentul reductorului
 W
λ -coeficientul de transmisie a caldurii (8...18 ―― ⋅ °C) λ ≔ 14
m2
ψ -coeficientu ce tine seama de faptul ca un anumit procent din
caldura produsa este evacuata prin fundatie
ψ ≔ 0.15
2
S -suprafata libera a carcasei [ m ]
S ≔ 0.18 m2
t -temperatura baii de ulei [ °C]

t0 -temperatura mediului ambiant(20 °C) t0 ≔ 20

Temperatura admisibila:
ta ≔ 70 °C
Se obtine:
P1 ⋅ ((1 - ηc)) ⋅ 10 3
t ≔ ―――――― + t0 = 57.171
λ ⋅ ((1 + ψ)) ⋅ S

D ≔ 62