Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
To the Reader: The piece Untitled (To Donna) II by Dan Flavin0 is a fine example of “the Death of the
Author” in Art. To further iterate my following point, I haven’t done any research on Flavin or the piece
besides visit the piece at the Portland Art Museum and read the accompanying info card1. While his name
is familiar I honestly cannot recall any other works, or any historical data on him in my mind. I will be
critiquing the piece through the lens of “The Death of the Author” By Roland Barthes2 and my physical
In “The Death of the Author” Roland Barthes sets up a paradox between post
enlightenment authors and their writing. He explains that society places too much
importance on the author. “It is language which speaks, not author: to write is, through a
prerequisite impersonality… to reach that point where only language acts, “performs”,
and not “me”.3 Authors scrawl and play with historically, culturally loaded building
blocks. The author manipulates these blocks (words): adding or subtracting, changing,
and researching their origins. The author consumes others manipulations (literature) in
order to inform their own manipulations. When the author reaches a state of content with
the piece he releases it and it becomes a piece of a much larger structure: the history of
literature. In this sense the author behaves as many post-modern artists do. They
contemporary artist acts, then, not as creator but as consumer, as an appropriator of things
Contemporary wing of the Portland Art Museum. Two of the lights vertically scale the
walls about four feet from the corner where the walls meet, they stand symmetrical each
other on respective walls. One of the units has a light blue fluorescent light, the other a
dark pink. The light bulb in each fixture faces the corner. Two more lights lie vertically
and project their yellow light away from the corner towards the viewer. One rests on the
floor, the other is attached four inches above it onto the vertical lights.
The throwing, then fading gradation of light from the fixtures transforms the dull
white corner into a relationship of forces and color. Light emits from the vertical fixtures
and shoots to the opposite wall creating a symbolic yin/yang of gender specific colors
that create somewhat of an optical illusion in how it playfully interacts with the corner,
opposing wall and color. There exists a very slender, almost invisible white line that runs
uses industrial materials and relational aesthetics to convey his cultural contribution. He
presents to us, complex interactions of colored light. Through thinking, living, gathering,
normally wouldn’t.
sacrifices praise of craft for praise of metaphor, and becomes an author of image and
object. The power of Untitled (For Donna) II lies purely in the viewer’s experience of the
piece, and each of their personal perspectives. If it is moved, it would just be four lights
made by General Electric. The viewer could even replicate it quite easily after
asks us to look closer, see things for more than they appear. The importance of the piece
can only be experienced not explained. It doesn’t matter who arranged these objects
simply that someone did, we get to stumble across it, and take pleasure in it. I’m happy to
live in a culture that appreciates such work. Flavins work sacrifices commodity for
experience, and the spectator reacts instinctually. I feel it is deeply important to the
These interactions are stumbled upon and not found simply. The most exciting
events are those we have yet to experience, yet to know! The hunt for this experience
leaves the reader, viewer, listener, and explorer always eager, never satisfied. I feel it is
this hunt that makes artists, authors. We should recognize all great art and literature
comes from souls searching for this. “Artistic geniuses” are nothing more than frantic
“We now know that a text is not a line of words releasing a single “theological”
original, blend and clash. The text is a tissue of quotations drawn from the innumerable
centers of culture.”5 This is also true when discussing art. There is no original, pure, or
perfect piece of art, or theory, or style. Progress, not person is important in these fields of
cultural production as with science or technology. Fame and fortune should never be
goals of a creative person; such sins have a horrible reputation for corruption of the mind.
Those with a curiosity for life act as reactors and producers of culture that serve in the
1.
2. . Barthes, Roland “The Death of the Author” Image, Text, Music (Hill and Wang, New
York, 1968)
3. Barthes, Roland “The Death of the Author” Image, Text, Music (Hill and Wang, New
5. Barthes, Roland “The Death of the Author” Image, Text, Music (Hill and Wang, New