Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
TRAININGS
CEFE CEFE
1 Introduction
You have probably often heard the words “adult education” in Education and
connection with CEFE courses. At the same time you are adult educa-
confronted with the words didactics, experimental learning, tion
methods of adult education, communication.... Often, however,
the clear delineation of the meanings behind these words has
been lacking.
In Chapter 3 you will learn about how adults take in new in- 3: Learning
formation: How does this information get into the brain, and process
CEFE CEFE
The fourth chapter introduces you to the tasks and tools of 4: Design of
trainers. Target group analysis, learning objectives and the learning situa-
most important methods are explained here. tions
Directly from the fourth chapter, the fifth chapter will contain a 5: Experiential
presentation of the experiential learning cycle, which forms the learning
basis on which CEFE seminars are conceived.
Another important question which also results from the fourth 6: Visualisation
chapter is as follows: How can diverse results of complex
learning situations, discussions and group work be recorded
and presented in a way visible to all? The sixth chapter will
present information on the various media which you can use
for visualisation, the important advantages and disadvantages
of the individual media and provide you with some important
rules for their use.
In the eighth chapter you will encounter a presentation of vari- 8: Self concept
ous training styles and an accompanying question as to which
trainer style is the correct one. This chapter concludes with a
few questions regarding typical seminar situations.
The ninth, and last, chapter is a test. If you have registered to 9: Test
participate in a ToT, then prior to the course you can send the
completed test to the institution where you will be attending
the ToT. The trainer of the ToT will, in this way, be able to
form an impression of your learning preconditions and direct
his planning towards your specific needs.
tion relates to the presentation of key themes which are im- on relevant
portant for trainers within the context of structuring their CEFE themes
courses with adults. The goal of this section is to provide a
graphical overview of relevant questions concerning adult
education in CEFE seminars.
7 Self concept
CEFE participants Trainer of the trainer
forms his own view of the world, thereby creating his own real- mastering
ity. Every person develops personal strategies and mecha- situations
nisms in order to be able to master the situations which arise arising in eve-
in daily life, and as a result tests these strategies and instru- ryday life
ments to see if they are functional and successful. Those in-
struments which are functional and successful are maintained,
while those which are less successful are either discarded and
replaced or modified. At the same time, one person’s use of
an instrument may lead him to his goal, while the same in-
strument is unusable for another person. There are no correct
or incorrect instruments. All of this is equally true for young
people as well as for adults.
ney through life, the greater the frequency with which his/her haviour in or-
instruments have already proven themselves. Practically every der to avoid
situation which forces an adult to question his instruments uncertainty
leads to doubts and insecurity. Doubt and insecurity are feel-
ings which people generally seek to avoid. Individuals do as
much as they can to protect themselves from such feelings by
ceasing to open their instruments to question, making them
sacrosanct. This is generally an unconscious process.
sional life situations. As long as the information being supplied sist when you
to these individuals is ‘neutral’ (e.g. a foreign language), these draw attention
strategies and instruments will be far from obvious. However, to faulty
if you as a trainer were to point out that an entrepreneur has to strategies
plan his marketing activities in advance, for example, you
But remember:
would encounter resistance if some of the participants were
this does not
entrepreneurs who usually made their decisions ad hoc and
mean adults
were of the opinion that this method had proven itself suc-
are less able to
cessful. We have to expect such resistance because our
learn!
strategies collide with those of the corresponding participants.
As trainers, we are easily tempted in such situations to as-
sume that adult learners are less able to learn. Yet a refusal
or obvious “non-learning” from such individuals generally has
nothing whatsoever to do with the ability to learn, rather much
more with the protection of their own strategies and thereby of
their own personality.
CEFE CEFE
For you as a trainer, the goal is to break through the partici- Breaking
pants’ protective wall. You might accomplish this, for example, through the
by designing specifically-targeted problem situations in which protective wall
the participants are forced to take a critical look at their own by creating
strategies. In CEFE seminars you should create as many such specifically-
situations as possible. This occurs via the so-called “partici- targeted prob-
pant-activating” methods: Within the framework of these lem situations
methods a participant is presented with a problem, and he has
to deal with this problem actively. The experience from this
action is then jointly reflected upon in the group. For this rea-
son we call this learning “experiential learning”. In the course
of many years in which this approach has been proven and Experiential
further developed in CEFE courses all over the world, a very learning cycle
special method of action has been developed which is re-
flected in the structure of the exercises. This will hereafter be
referred to as the experiential learning cycle.
formal. This can also provide information concerning the par- portant ele-
ticipants’ thought processes. All of these questions constitute ment of target
important components of the didactic planning which takes group analysis
place prior to a CEFE course: We call this target group
analysis. This will be dealt with more closely in the chapter
Didactics: How to design learning situations.
Finally, in the course of our discussion of how adults generally Your specific
deal with ‘reality’, we would like to take a brief look at your role perception of
as a trainer. In a seminar you are an adult amongst other re- reality
sponsible adults. You are neither ‘better’ nor ‘cleverer’ than the
participants – you have developed your own specific thought
processes in your mind and your own individual view of the
world as a result of your childhood, life history and cultural en-
vironment – just as the participants have done in their own
• Adults do not like being lectured or talked down to. They Not everyone
have their “own minds”. They have their “own thoughts”. will understand
You, as a trainer, are also no more than an adult with your your explana-
CEFE CEFE
own thoughts. Therefore you should accept that even when tions
your explanations are plausible and viable for one partici-
pant, they may be incomprehensible or out of the question
for another.
Refusals to
Those who are learning deal with the subject matter in an learn
extremely autonomous way on account of their individual
life histories. Often a refusal to learn is also due to an indi-
vidual’s life history, and is initially, at least, ‘the right way’ for
the individual in question.
• As a trainer, you are not dealing with absolute truths either, Your views are
rather imparting views which appear to be correct to you on based on your
account of your life history. The only important difference life history
between you and the participants is that you are better in-
formed than the participants (in both the subject as well in
the methodology). Yet it is up to the participant to decide if Didactic work
CEFE CEFE
Observation
to recognise that we are unable to comprehend the world from the meta
objectively. We can see that we are all different. We realise perspective
our limitations through comparison with other people and Distance from
through contemplation of our surroundings. As a trainer, your feelings
you should repeatedly practice your ability to perform this
so-called ‘observation from the meta perspective (bird’s-eye
view)’. It isn’t enough for you to recognise that the partici-
pants do not understand one another – you have to recog-
nise why this is the case (differing explanatory models and
what they are) and react accordingly. You should also ob-
serve the processes between you and the participants and
analyse them from the meta perspective. This can spare
you excessive personal consternation when there are
problems in the seminar. By taking the meta perspective
you can gain a distance to happenings in the seminar and,
when necessary, from your own feelings.
CEFE CEFE
One thing which surely belongs here is the need to learn. The need to
When adults register for a CEFE course, they do so either with learn
the aim of trying to set up shop independently, or they are al-
ready self-employed and have noticed personal deficiencies in
specific areas. Ideally you could assume that participants
come to a course already possessing a general knowledge of
their problems and that they are open to the content of the
course. This may not be the case, however. There may be
participants who have been obliged to attend by funding insti-
tutions, or there could be participants who heard through the
grapevine that CEFE courses are good, but who actually be-
lieve that they already know everything they need to know.
One way of counteracting this problem is to provide informa- How this can
tion beforehand. Also it is often the case that the style of the be counter-
CEFE courses is already familiar through the stories of past acted
participants, or clearly demonstrated by the participants’ suc-
cessful implementation of what they have learned in the CEFE
courses. In this case, you can assume that the participants
have high learning expectations, combined with a readiness to
play an active role in this process themselves.
Alongside the learning desires, there are further expectations Affective de-
which adults wish to fulfil by means of further education, and in sires
many cases these are of greater importance that the learning
desire: These are the affective and social-communicative de-
sires. By affective desires we mean the area of feelings and
CEFE CEFE
Learning takes place within the individual. As a trainer you are Proof from
not able to see inside those people seeking to learn something subsequent
with your support. It is only later, through the changed behav- behaviour of
CEFE CEFE
iour of the participant, that you will be able to see whether or the achieve-
not something has been learned. If, for example, the learning ment of a
objective of an exercise is that “in difficult situations the par- learning objec-
ticipant seeks additional information”, and by means of the tive
processing, i.e. the process of acquisition after the experi-
ences in the seminar, the participant has shown that he has
gained cognisance of this, then it will be possible in the course
of a new exercise to see from the participant’s behaviour if the
learning objective has been achieved. If the participant still
does not seek new information in the next exercise or even in
the remainder of the course, this does not mean that nothing
has been learned. His learning success can also present itself
weeks or months later, when he encounters a comparable
situation in “real” life and is able to utilise the knowledge
gained from the course in this situation. This means that you
will by no means always be able to determine whether or not
something has been learned within the framework of the
CEFE CEFE
The everyday experiences described above are easier to un- The brain as a
derstand once you take a closer look at the way in which the three-level fil-
human mind takes in and processes information from the envi- ter
ronment.
Alongside these conditions which apply to the same extent to Individuals’ dif-
everyone, there are a number of differences in the manner in ferent ways of
which each individual processes information: Have you ever processing in-
had the experience that you have listened to exactly the same formation
report on the radio as a friend has, yet when discussing it later
with this same individual you notice that they were able to re-
member many more details than you were? Have you also
met people who were very good at remembering smells? Are
you yourself a person who is good at remembering details
from pictures, photographs, etc.?
The test will help you to determine through which of the four channels
(seeing, hearing, reading, touching) the test person is best able to store
information in his or her long-term memory, and which forms of learning
are best combined with one another. In order to carry out this test you will
require a partner.
Please give the test person the following ten words to read. The subject
is allowed to view each word for a total of two seconds. Directly after
the words have been viewed, you are to give them thirty seconds’ worth
of arithmetical exercises from the box below. Then you are to give the
subjects thirty seconds to remember the words and to name them
(measure the time exactly!)
Please make note of the number of words the subject was able to
name.
CEFE CEFE
Read the following ten words to your partner out loud, at two second
intervals and speaking clearly. Then you are once again to give your
partner 30 seconds worth of arithmetical exercises and 20 seconds to
remember the words he or she has heard and to name them.
Please make note of the number of words the subject was able to
name.
Please gather the ten objects (or similar) from the following list into a
bowl and lay them on the table in front of your partner at two-second
intervals. Afterwards give him another thirty seconds worth of mental
arithmetic exercises and then allow him twenty seconds to remember
and name the objects.
CEFE CEFE
penny, flannel, key, notebook, apple, knife, record, pencil, thimble, but-
ton
Please make note of the number of words the subject was able to
name.
Once again gather the ten objects from the following list into a bowl and
blindfold the person who is to be tested. Now, every two seconds, place
an object into the person’s hands which the subject will be able to rec-
ognise after briefly touching it. Then another thirty seconds of mental
arithmetic exercises and twenty seconds to recall the objects.
Please make note of the number of objects the subject was able to
name.
This time the test subject is allowed to see, hear, read and touch the
objects. Once again you are to gather the ten objects from the following
list. In addition, write the names of these objects on a small piece of pa-
per. Now place one object in your partner’s hands once every two sec-
onds, at the same time placing the piece of paper with the name in front
of him and saying it loudly and clearly. Afterwards you are to give the
test person another thirty seconds of mental arithmetic exercises and
twenty seconds to remember and name the objects.
ring, soap, hammer, hat, paint brush, stone, note, pen, plate, bread
Please make note of the number of objects the subject was able to
name.
CEFE CEFE
The objects within the test can be adapted as required. They should be
easily recognisable and often-used objects. Particularly for test 4, the ob-
jects should have distinctive shapes.
3x7, 3÷3, 5x5, 2x10, 5x5, 2+17, 8x5, 11-4, 1+6, 35-6, 9-3, 10-7, 8÷4, 7x2,
2÷2, 4x4, 5÷1, 17-4, 8x7, 6x7, 9+3, 7x7 ....
Evaluation
This test should show you through which channels you are particularly
good at taking in information. The values only reveal tendencies. The re-
sults of the individual tests represent the quality of the channel. Should
your results be a four or five for all tests, the channels are of equal value.
Any deviation towards higher values indicates a preference for the channel
in question. If you have a 2 for both reading and hearing, while having a 5
for seeing and touching, you shouldn’t be surprised if you have problems
retaining information from books. As a rule the result for the combined test
CEFE CEFE
should be at least as high as the best result, and it is often even higher.
The difference to the other values should show you how important it is for
the test person to receive stimulation over more than one channel when
learning.
(This test was taken from: Vester; F.: Denken, Lernen, Vergessen, Munich:
dtv 1985, p. 153 ff)
Regardless of which channel you make the most use of when Stimulate as
receiving information, you are also perceiving something many channels
through the other channels. This is why it is best to absorb as possible
important information over as many channels as possible.
Take the example of the evening news on television. Here
most of the spoken information is also supported by pictures.
These can either be films or graphics.
1
Numerous people have differing theories concerning the actual learning process. Within
the framework of this manual it isn’t possible to provide an overview of the various ap-
proaches. Please refer to the following works for an extensive treatment of the subject: Hilgard,
E. R./Bower, G. H.: Theories of Learning, Engelwood Cliffs (N. J.) 1975.
As a trainer, you cannot always see (directly) whether or not Three steps of
something has been learned because it may not be expressed the learning
in the form of a behaviour which is visible to you. As touched process:
upon earlier, learning can take place over both shorter and
longer periods of time. So what exactly is happening during
this time period? Or, to use the terminology which we have
employed previously: Which steps characterise the path from
the learning prerequisites to the learning outcomes. Re-
gardless of whether the learning takes place within the frame-
work of an organised learning event with a trainer or on an
independently-controlled basis, that which occurs during a
successful learning process can be summarised in three
steps:
Motivation
CEFE CEFE
Interest in a topic
Consolidation
Repeating and applying
something new Acquisition
3. In the step known as consolidation that which has just been Consolidation
acquired is repeated and thereby transported into the long-
term memory. Typical examples for this consolidation step
are review questions and frequent application. As a result of
this, that which has been acquired is repeatedly recalled
into consciousness and thereby consolidated. As a CEFE
trainer you can promote consolidation by presenting new
exercises which offer an opportunity to make use of com-
petencies acquired thorough previous exercises and to fur-
ther develop them.
Let us use, as an example, your efforts this very moment to The three
learn something about the basic elements. You have an inter- steps through
CEFE CEFE
est in learning something about this field because you wish to which you
work as a trainer. You are looking for concrete answers to pass when you
your questions in this section. A few years ago, before you learn about the
had even thought about working in this field, you probably basic elements
would not even have touched this handbook. Whether or not of learning
you are motivated at this moment in time is dependent, for
example, on whether or not you have ever thought about how
learning actually works, or if you think the explanations for the
three steps have been presented in an interesting manner.
These factors vary greatly from one individual to the next, and
as a result each individual’s learning ability varies as well.
Learning ability is, more than anything else, the outcome of
learning processes, and it has an effect upon every subse-
quent learning action.
It was long assumed that a person’s increasing age influences Learning abil-
learning ability. Yet recent experience and the latest results of ity and age
international empirical studies have shown that this is not the
case. Illnesses may occasionally have an influence on learn-
ing ability, but age itself does not. Studies have clearly shown
that learning ability during the years of adulthood is very
CEFE CEFE
In other words, increasing age does not result in any decrease Structural
in learning ability, rather a change in structure: it is possible, changes in
for example, that mental retention and learning speed de- mental abilities
crease. This decreasing mental capacity can be compensated
for by optimising other capabilities, e.g. through the differenti-
ated ability to target and arrange information, or by particular
care in and motivation to learn. For this reason it is very possi-
ble that the overall intellectual capability of an adult may re-
main relatively stable until a very advanced age.
2
Literature related to this research: Baltes, P.B., S.L. Williams: Cognitive development
and modifiability in adulthood, and Baltes P.B., G.V. Labouvie: Adult development of
intellectual performance; both in ; Elsdorfer, C., M.P. Lawton: The psychology of adult
development, American Psychological Association 1973)
In the actual seminar situation, the degree of learning motiva- Learning suc-
tion depends, among other things, upon which expectations cess and
the learner has for his or her own learning success. One of the learning re-
things upon which the expectations for learning success are wards influ-
based is the individual’s previous experience with learning. If a ence the moti-
person feels as if he or she has never been able to learn vation to learn
things which other people can, they will have low expectations
for their own learning success. Positive experiences lead to a
correspondingly high level of expectations. When great ex-
pectations are dashed, this can lead to discouragement and
vice versa.
You will observe the participants in the seminar. You will see Learning be-
how curious individual participants are. You will see, for in- haviour
stance, which participants are obviously setting themselves a
new challenge and which prefer to hold back, waiting. You will
see whether a participant tries to understand the most impor-
tant terms and clearly separate these from other terms. Or you
CEFE CEFE
We try to use the learning style to infer the kind of person be- Learning types
hind it. As a result of their appropriation of reality and an in-
crease in experiences, adult persons have developed certain
basic personality characteristics such as care, self-confidence,
optimism, hesitancy or, for instance, a lack of self-confidence
with relation to learning. Learning types can be inferred with
the help of these characteristics. By observing people it is
possible to recognise various patterns of behaviour. With
these patterns, it is possible to classify the people into one of
these categories.
after a very short time and you are able to allocate them to a
basic category. Then you can consider how you wish to ap-
proach the person, according to their learning type; how you
can motivate them, for example, or how you will be able to
give them special assistance. This makes your work as a
trainer easier.
A third important approach is the Kolb approach from the sev- The Kolb ap-
enties. It is based on the idea that people learn in different proach
ways. Using a test developed by Kolb, the course participants
perform a self-evaluation of these learning styles. The results
of this test are calculated and 4 learning types are formed fol-
lowing the cognition theory of Piaget, from Switzerland.
Before Kolb's four learning types are described, you can try
the learning style test yourself:
Below you will find nine lines with four terms on each. Read
the four terms on each line and put these terms into order:
give 4 points to the term which best describes your learning
style and then give 3, 2 and 1 points to the other terms in de-
scending order. The term which worst describes your learning
style is awarded 1 point. The points 4 - 1 may only be awarded
once on each line.
You will probably find it difficult to choose the term which best
characterises your learning style. Try and do the best you can.
The goal of this test is to describe how you learn and not to
evaluate your learning capability.
CEFE CEFE
To evaluate:
Now vertically add the scores in each column, but only the
scores of the lines in that column (i.e. for the column CE the
scores for the words differentiating, abstract and intensive are
not taken into consideration).
Percentiles
-12
0- -10
-8
10- -7
-6
20- -5
Accomodators -3 Divergers
30- -2
40- -1
0
50-
60- 1
70- 2
80- 3
AE - RO
90- 17 15 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -11
Convergers 6
Assimilators
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
18
CEFE CEFE
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Percentiles
AC - CE
AE = active experimentation
RO = reflective observation
AC = abstract conceptualisation
CE = concrete experience
An example:
AE - RO = 16 - 12 = 4
AC - CE = 18 - 14= 4
The point described thus falls into the lower left-hand quad-
CEFE CEFE
Kolb's test is relatively old. It has the disadvantage of being The value of
based exclusively on self-evaluation, although it has proven learning style
itself in practice. There are other tests on this subject, some of tests in shap-
CEFE CEFE
which can be found on the Internet or found out about from the ing your semi-
Internet. In addition to the tests, there are also general trea- nar
tises. As a starting point for your search you can have a look
at the Internet sites3 .
3
Mills, Dennis W.: Applying What We Know - Student Learning Styles,
http://www.csrnet.org/csrnet/articles/student-learning-styles.html
Learning Styles Inventory: what is your personal learning style?
http://www.howtolearn.com/personal.html
Telecommunications for Remote Work and Learning, Pedagogy, Learning Styles.
http://www.cyg.net:80/~jblackmo/diglib/styl.html
Algonquin, Learning on the Internet - A General Education Course.
http://www.algonquinc.on.ca/edtech/gened/
5. ... has the feeling that you are not explaining the subject
matter clearly.
6. ... does not agree with your methodical process.
7. ... suffers from a lack of self confidence due to previous,
negative learning experiences.
8. ... feels that his set method of interpreting and values
scale are being brought into question and tries to protect
them.
9. ... is frightened of too much personal criticism.
10. ... is not motivated in the set learning situation.
11. ... does not receive adequate study help from you.
12. ... does not receive adequate help from you with consoli-
dation.
CEFE CEFE
With regard to the problem of an individual not feeling suffi- Involve partici-
ciently challenged, it can be useful to include the person in pants who are
question as an expert when carrying out specific seminar over- or under-
situations. In this way, the other participants can share in their stretched to a
knowledge and the person himself learns from the new de- greater degree
mands made of him.
During the planning stage and over the course of the seminar Continual
itself, you should try to find out as much as possible about analysis of the
each individual participant on your course. The more your target groups
know about the target group, the less you risk putting too helps to avoid
many or too few demands on the participants. What is their incorrect
background, which type of profession have they pursued or evaluations
are they currently pursuing? What are their goals for the fu-
ture? What training have they had? What experiences did they
have at school? What formal qualifications do they have? Give
yourself a clear picture of the participants' attitude to training.
Try to determine how the participants themselves judge their
requirements and their learning capability.
CEFE CEFE
Body language
from this whether participants feel that too many or too few is an indicator
demands are being placed on them. Organise regular evalua-
tion sessions, where the participants can give suggestions.
CEFE course often represent possible changes with regard to Dealing re-
individual basis convictions, attitudes and personal character- sponsibly with
istics. During their lives, adults have developed a relatively justified resis-
stable concept of themselves. If every adult was totally flexible tance
and capable of learning with regard to questions relating to
identity, he would go from one identity crisis to the next. As a
result, a certain resistance from adults towards appeals to be
flexible serves the purpose of providing justifiable self-
protection (points 9 and 10 of the learning resistances listed).
4
Body language is an important component of communication. In the following there are
examples of methods of interpretation:
• A closed stance is, for example, characterised by crossed arms lying protectively
across the body; the back is slightly rounded and the shoulders hang slightly for-
ward. The head is lowered, with eyes to the ground: this prevents making eye
contact with others. This is a defensive type of stance.
• The defensive stance can be intensified by the person turning their whole body
away from the person or group. If all the participants are sitting in a circle, the
situation can arise where one person is constantly sitting outside of the imaginary
circle. This can be an indication that this person regards themselves as an ob-
CEFE CEFE
Experiment and vary your repertoire in order to make the par- Motivational
ticipants receptive to new objects and situations. The motiva- aids in individ-
tion of adults is increased, the more they know about the ual learning
CEFE CEFE
background and the more links they can create to the knowl- situations
edge which they already have.
Further literature
Buzan, Tony: Make the Most of Your Mind, New York: E. P. Dutton, 1984
Buzan, Tony: Use Both Sides of Your Brain, New York: E. P. Dutton, 1974.
Galyean, Beverly: Mind Sight, Learning Through Imaging, Center for Inte-
grative Learning, 207 West Manson, Santa Barbara, CA., 93101, 1983.
CEFE CEFE
Kolb, David: The Learning Style Inventory Technical Manual. Boston 1976.
Pete and Paula are two trainers who hold CEFE seminars. Pete and Paula
Paula has already run a whole series of seminars. Peter is
starting his first seminar in the next few days. Their questions,
problems and ideas lead you through this chapter.
Paula: ”Well Pete, you look like you've had it, what's the
matter?”
Pete: ”Ah, I've just read a lot about the way which we per-
ceive reality and how we learn. My head's spinning
because there's so much to take into account! I'm
starting to wonder how a trainer can manage to think
of everything and get a useful CEFE seminar off the
ground.”
Paula: ”Oh no, it sounds as if you're feeling a bit depressed.”
Pete: ”Well, I hope that I'll now get some practical indica-
CEFE CEFE
The information from the dialogue can be summarised as fol- Definition ap-
lows: proach
As all these questions are to be answered before the begin- Didactic action
ning of a seminar, you can assume that didactic action is means prepa-
mainly concerned with the preparation of CEFE courses, i.e. ration
with the planning and decision-making before the start of the
seminar. At the same time, detailed planning does not prevent
the seminar progressing in a creative and flexible manner. It
also does not prevent phases of self-study. A trainer who, be-
fore the seminar, thinks about the points at which he would
like to make use of spontaneous activities and creativity, and
at which points he would like to collate, structure and work on
results, supports the learning process of the participants.
CEFE CEFE
Didactics preparation also means that trainers mentally adjust Preparing men-
to surprises, i.e. they are prepared for unexpected interpreta- tally for unex-
tions, questions, participant suggestions, resistance and other pected situa-
incidents. Within the framework of a CEFE training, this atti- tions
tude could, for example, become noticeable in the following
situation: During the evaluation of an exercise the emphasis of
the discussion is on group dynamic processes and not on the
learning objective which you wish to achieve as the main point
of this exercise. The planning which is now required is more a
question of ad hoc planning, where you have to compare your
previous planning with the new development in no time and
consider how to deviate from the previous plan, integrate the
new development and still reach your goal. You must decide
within the space of seconds how and whether to change your
schedule and whether you are going to modify your objectives.
Such a procedure requires a lot of composure, a lot of experi-
ence and, above all, the will to constantly reflect on these ex-
CEFE CEFE
periences.
In the following chapters it will become clear that the areas Close link be-
learning objectives, methods and target group are closely tween the ar-
CEFE CEFE
linked. The interesting and demanding task of the trainer is to eas of didac-
operate within this area of conflict. tics
In this dialogue Pete and Paula talk about the target group. In Target group:
the context of didactics, the target group is understood as a adults, busi-
group of people who are taking part in a seminar, a course, ness people,
etc. With regard to certain criteria they are similar. Within the individuals
context of a didactic analysis, you should first regard the group
as a whole. In CEFE courses this group always consists of
These are two different aspects. The first aspect has to do Typical re-
with the 'requirements', which adults and business people quirements of
typically bring with them. The second aspect is concerned with adults
'concrete requirements with relation to the learning objectives
in the CEFE courses'. The first aspect has already been ex-
amined in detail in chapter 2 and chapter 3.
Pete thinks about exactly what he wants to know about the Pete and Paula
participants in order to carry out his didactics planning:
Pete and Paula find six different areas and have formulated
questions for these areas:
• What were the person's learning experiences during the time they
were at school (if they attended school regularly)?
• Did they have the feeling of learning easily or with difficulty?
1
As a trainer, you will also often be responsible for structuring organisational outline con-
ditions. If, for example, you want to achieve a high participation level among women in a
region where they are mainly responsible for bringing up children, it is sensible to ar-
range the times of the CEFE course to suit the women’s requirements and to fit it in with
possible childcare arrangements etc.
According to which questions Peter selects, he can, for in- Results from
CEFE CEFE
As a result, the target group analysis should not stop with your Continue to
efforts in advance. It is a continual accompaniment to the update the tar-
seminar. Every day you learn something new about your par- get group
ticipants. You get to know their learning requirements and analysis
readapt the planning for the next day or evening of the semi-
nar to these learning requirements. The learning requirements
are the competencies, which an adult brings to the learning
situation. After every successful learning process, you can
assume that the participants have changed learning compe-
tencies and, as a result, changed learning requirements.
These changed learning requirements are again taken into
consideration when structuring the next exercise.
CEFE CEFE
CEFE CEFE
Paula: "What, you are going to hold your first seminar next
month? That's great!”
Pete: "Yes, it starts in two weeks - and a full course straight
away ... I'm already quite nervous."
Paula: "I can understand that. Tell me, what are your objec-
tives for the participants?"
Pete: "Well, they should learn how to think in a business-like
manner!"
Paula: "Yes, that was my objective formulation before the first
CEFE CEFE
The objectives which are discussed in this dialogue are de- Learning ob-
scribed as learning objectives. Learning objectives describe jectives are
what a participant should be able to do at the end of a semi- related to the
nar. Learning objectives are concerned with a concrete target participants
group and, consequently, should be formulated in such a way
that they can be achieved by this target group in the time in-
tended. Therefore, the trainer needs to give extensive consid-
eration to the prerequisites of the participants, both before
the start of the seminar and during the course of the seminar.
The following definition can be made with this information: Definition ap-
proach learn-
Learning objectives are objectives which a trainer ing objective
determines for the participants before the begin-
ning of a seminar or before the beginning of a
CEFE exercise. In the context of one or more ar-
eas of content, the final behaviour of the partici-
pants is defined as the desired result of the
learning process.
Below you will find the basic rules for formulating learning ob-
jectives.
1. Learning objectives always have to be formulated from the Basic rules for
participants point of view. formulating
learning objec-
Example: Participants know the elements of the productive tives
problem solving cycle.
CEFE CEFE
Learning objectives can be formulated for four different areas Four catego-
of behaviour: ries of learning
Area:
Head - cognitive
Area:
Heart - affective
Area:
Interhuman - socio-communicative
The importance of this area has been increasing steadily, as private
and professional lifesituations can only be coped with successfully
by means of communicative interaction with other people. The
description of this area is a relatively new approach. A basic
framework of this area follows below.
When you first formulate learning objectives for a CEFE exer- Consequences
cise, you will normally do this automatically in the cognitive for your prepa-
area. However, the spectrum of human behaviour also in- ration
cludes values and communication with others. In this respect,
CEFE CEFE
there.”
Pete: ”Yes, and they were only excerpts....only what does
that mean for the structure of my course?”
Paula: ”Basically you are dealing with adults who want to be-
come business people and who haven't attended
seminar-type events for a long time. As a result, we
have to consider which method of imparting is basi-
cally useful for this target group. Then you have to de-
fine each of the concrete learning situations and apply
appropriate methods for these learning situations. ”
Pete: ”Well great, what does appropriate mean then?”
Paula: ”You have to think about which methods are particu-
larly suitable, against the background of the prerequi-
sites for learning and objectives which you have se-
lected for this learning situation.”
CEFE CEFE
During the next few hours, Pete and Paula study some im- How to impart?
portant, methodical forms: The main question is how to impart
to the participants the learning content which they have se-
lected and put into concrete terms by formulating the learning
objectives.
Here, there are basically two recognised forms in pedagogy: 2 Basic forms
1. The traditional form is the one where the trainer dominates. 1. Trainer
Here, these whole-class teaching methods differ from other dominates
methods which are geared more toward discussion and the
involvement of participants. With the classical whole-class
teaching method, the trainer dominates the seminar; he
gives presentations, asks questions and judges whether the
answers from the participants are right or wrong. He steers
CEFE CEFE
As the presentation also has a part to play in the modern Rules for giv-
forms described below, Pete and Paula also compile some ing a presenta-
rules for a good presentation: tion
•
CEFE CEFE
Role-play Role-play
Participant-oriented methods do not mean that the seminar The role of the
leader does not influence what happens in the seminar. His trainer in par-
didactic work is more focused on the area of preparation, ob- ticipant-
servation and targeted mediation of the evaluation. A well oriented meth-
thought-out role-play with cards, materials and aids for the ods
course of the discussion and evaluation process usually re-
quires a lot more preparation work than a presentation or a
trainer-participant discussion. It entails intensive reflection on
the target group, if necessary with individuals, so the trainer
can decide in advance which role will be assigned to which
person, for instance. With participant-oriented methods it is not
the activity of the trainer but that of the participant which is the
focal point. The competence of the trainer has an indirect ef-
fect. He is responsible for the fact that simulation rules are set
up, accepted by everyone and observed. The trainer has to
CEFE CEFE
It should be pointed out that you do not always have to deter- Dominance of
mine a learning objective and select appropriate methods for the content or
this as the first step after analysing the target group. It is also dominance of
possible to basically consider the use of methods for a target the method?
group and select certain methods or integral methods in ad-
vance, or parallel to the concrete formulation of learning ob-
jectives. Such a procedure influences the determination of
learning objectives: Only content which can be imparted using
the methods determined will be selected.
repertoire of methods.
Further reading
Knoll, Jörg: Kurs- und Seminarmethoden. ein Trainingsbuch zur Gestaltung von Kursen und Semi-
naren, Arbeits- und Gesprächskreisen. 6. überarb, Aufl. Beltz: Weinheim, Basel 1995.
Müller, Kurt (Hrsg.): Kurs- und Seminargestaltung: ein Handbuch für Mitarbeiter/innen im Bereich von
CEFE CEFE
Bloom, Benjamin S.:Taxonomy of educational objectives. I. Cognitive domain, New York: Mc Kay
1972.
Krathwohl, David. R.: Taxonomy of educational objectives. II Affective domain. New York: Mc Kay,
1971.
CEFE CEFE
There are now different terms for this cycle in literature, al- Basic structure
though the basic structure is always comparable. Starting with
a concrete experience, observations are made on this phase
in the subsequent phase and the events are reflected upon
critically. In the following phase, an attempt is made to draw
more general conclusions from the concrete experience in or-
der to make it possible to transfer this to new situations. In the
next phase the knowledge is applied in a new situation. This
application leads to a new experience which is then the start-
ing point for the next cycle. At best, knowledge can be gained
in each cycle, so the next cycle starts, in effect, on a higher
level.
Action/Experience
Application
Cycle
of Publishing
Experiential
Learning
Generalising
CEFE CEFE
Processing
In the action phase, the participants can act freely within the
framework of the conditions stipulated. This phase serves the
development of individual planning, execution and control
tools. When there are situations which also have to be dealt
with in groups, there are further co-ordination processes, con-
flict-solving situations etc.
Normally, you will not manage to perform all these tasks in the Rules for re-
first exercise of a seminar. The participants first have to get spectful be-
used to this type of learning. Therefore, it can be useful to ex- haviour during
plain the basic rules of discussion in processing before, or with the seminar
the help of, the first exercise. The rules of feedback should
also be introduced at this point.
CEFE CEFE
Processing has to be well prepared. So well, that over the The key for
course of the discussion, you know exactly at which point to good proc-
intervene to bring the discussion back to the important points essing is
or when you can or must behave quietly because the knowl- preparation
edge is coming from the group dynamic. Behaving appropri-
ately here is also a question of experience. In order to jointly
achieve workable results, you must always endeavour to cre-
ate and maintain an atmosphere of trust.
• How did you feel in your role? (If possible, ask all the participants) Example ques-
• Would you have expected yourselves to behave in such a way, or did tions for proc-
you expect something different? essing
• Did you expect the others to behave the way they did?
• Did you make a conscious decision to behave in the way you did?
• How did you proceed, did you develop new strategies?
CEFE CEFE
You can assist the generalising phase with prepared handouts Assistance
containing general knowledge. At this point, you can also im- through addi-
plement other methodical elements. For example, you can tional content
give a lecturette in which you present similar cases from real and media
life and applicable solution strategies, or theoretical back-
ground knowledge.
In this manual, you will find a list with details of the reference
literature for each module, so you can create handouts after
CEFE CEFE
In brief the experiential learning cycle in CEFE contains all the In brief: expe-
elements which have also been described in chapter 3: riential learn-
CEFE CEFE
ing cycle in
Due to its general occupation with the target group, experien- CEFE as a in-
tial learning was selected as an appropriate, didactic, me- tegral method
thodical procedure. The structure permits the flexible formula-
tion of learning objectives oriented towards the concrete target
group. Generalising is an open phase enabling the inclusion of
additional, methodical elements (e.g. the lecturette).
which you adapt the schedule or the materials is your own de-
cision, based on the conditions which you find and on the
learning requirements of your actual group of participants.
for you. They are compiled for a standard target group and a set position
within the course program. (In chapter 3.3 you will see how to form learn-
ing objectives yourself.) Here, you will also find information about where
this exercise was developed.
rounded off by tips for every step which the authors have been able to
gather from their own experience.
G: Variations Example
On this page under 1) you will find references for which other parts of the
course this exercise can be used. If no alternative is mentioned, this does
not mean that this exercise cannot be used at another point. If you decide
to use it in a different way, you have to change the learning objectives cor-
respondingly. There are also suggestions from the authors for corre-
sponding learning objectives for alternative uses.
Under 2) Minimising, you will find suggestions on how to shorten the exer-
cise, if necessary.
CEFE CEFE
H: Annexes Example
Under this letter you will find prepared charts and master copies of back-
ground information for worksheets, which should make preparation easier.
You can substitute or add your own material. We would particularly like to
point out that the literature list in part IV of every module is particularly
useful for creating accompanying handouts for the generalising phase.
Energisers are one of the things available to assist your semi- The energiser
nar structuring. Energisers are short exercises which can be as the addi-
used at the beginning or the end of a seminar sequence or tional element
between the exercises, where necessary. They have different in CEFE semi-
functions: They are used to maintain motivation or to build it nars
up again. They can also be used as a tool to form teams for
the next exercise or to agree the subject of the next exercise.
You can have a look at an example. You will find a detailed
description of energisers in part IV.
CEFE CEFE
CEFE CEFE
• In this way, learning can come from the person's own direct Wide base of
experience. It also makes it possible to learn from the expe- experience
rience of other participants and to learn with the assistance
CEFE CEFE
• By having to take on other roles and reflecting on them af- Different per-
terwards, the participants get to know different perspec- spec-tives
tives.
Relation-ship
developing a relationship of trust between the participants. of trust
In this way, participants learn how important stable relation-
ships are for their professional development. This could
also have a positive effect on forming teams to start enter-
prises in the future.
ticipants for the methods which you want to use and creates
an atmosphere of mutual respect. Motivation is also created
in the concrete, simulated situation: The participants are
confronted with a task which challenges them. Apart from
the motivation they have at the start, during the course of
the exercise they normally develop a concrete motivation,
directed towards the learning content, via which they can
reflect on their own behaviour and that of the other partici-
pants, analyse the advantages and disadvantages of differ-
ent ways of solving problems and find out for themselves in
which areas their own behaviour can be improved. You can
Further reading
Banyard, P., & Hayes, N.: Psychology: Theory and Application. London:
Chapman & Hall, 1994.
th
Knowles, M.: The Adult Learner: A Neglectes Species (4 ed.). Houston:
Gulf Publishing, 1990.
Knox, A.: Helping Adults Learn. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1986.
Peters, J., Jarvis, P., et al.: Adult Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass,
1991.
nd
Rogers, A.: Teaching Adults (2 ed.). Buckingham: Open University
Press, 1996.
CEFE CEFE
In chapter 3.2 we discussed the fact that people perceive in- Information in-
formation from their environment via various channels. We take varies
have demonstrated that the ability to take in information greatly be-
through the various channels varies. We have also explained tween indi-
the different learning types . In other words, as a trainer you viduals
are facing people whose means and capabilities for taking in
information vary tremendously.
mean values for the senses with which people are able to take ceives long-
in information most effectively: On average, the test subjects lasting visibil-
retained 20% of the information they had heard, 30% of what ity for all
they had seen, 50% of what they had both seen and heard,
and even 90% of that which they had seen, heard and experi- Involvement of
mented with, in other words which they had learned hands-on. various chan-
Visualisation is of particular importance to CEFE exercises nels
because the experience is made visible for everyone, and re-
viewed and retained in clear terms. In addition, people as a
rule learn better when they are able to associate the material
to be learned with something they are already familiar with,
something they themselves have experienced, with an actual
ticipants:
Many publications dealing with the topic of visualisation as- Broad under-
sume a thorough understanding of the necessary techniques. standing of
CEFE CEFE
6.2.1 Blackboard
The blackboard is the classical medium for visualisation. It is Classical me-
often associated with ‘classical’ school instruction methods. In dium
training rooms the blackboard is often replaced by the white-
board, overhead projector or flipchart. Use of the whiteboard is
CEFE CEFE
Information has to be wiped from the board, however, in order For flexible in-
to add new information, after which the information which has formation
been wiped away is no longer there to be used. In other
words, the blackboard is the ideal medium for visualising in-
Notes on usage
6.2.2 Flipchart
The flipchart frames commonly available in shops are made of Description of
metal and are generally equipped with height-adjustable legs. the flipchart
The upper end is fitted with metal pins on which flipchart paper
can be hung using the holes provided for this purpose. A fold-
able metal bar is usually present to prevent slippage. A place
is provided at the bottom for the storage of pens. In the event
that a prefabricated flipchart is not available, an easel may
also be used; hooks or large wing nuts must simply be fitted to
the upper edge so that the paper can be hung. The important
thing is that it have a stable base and that the pages may be
removed individually.
In principle, the use of the flipchart is identical to that of the For informa-
CEFE CEFE
blackboard, with the sole difference being that the sheets of tion which is to
paper may be kept, allowing information to be saved for use be kept
when required at a later date (e.g. to be kept in a spot visible
to all at all times in the training room, or to be used again at a
later point in the course). Flipcharts are therefore more expen-
sive than a blackboard, however, which can also be used for
many courses.
Notes on usage
• At the end of the day, all of the paper which has been writ-
ten on should be removed if you are certain that it is not
needed for other seminar units. You can and will be able to
reuse other pages later; the repetitive aspect of this exer-
cise aids in consolidating that which has been learned and
serves as a good motivator when used as a starting point
for a new learning situation.
CEFE CEFE
The overhead projector has the advantage of never requiring Always di-
you to turn your back to the group. You maintain direct contact rected towards
with the group at all times and are able to perceive all of their the group
CEFE CEFE
Transparencies are very easy to prepare, e.g. you could also – This medium
if you have access to the technical facilities – simply print out lends itself to
session documents directly onto transparencies. This saves preparation
you the trouble of having to transfer this onto flipchart paper.
Transparencies are also ideal for multiple use, meaning you
can considerably reduce your preparatory work, e.g. for lectu-
rettes.
step-by-step process,
Notes on usage
transparency you are able to ensure that it does not slip off.
• Always turn off the projector when you are finished with it
CEFE CEFE
(this will not damage it in any way). The moment you turn it
back on, the attention of the group shall immediately be di-
rected towards the projection screen.
The Metaplan technique is distinguished by the fact that par- Participant in-
ticipants write down their contributions, ideas or suggestions volvement
onto cards. These cards are then pinned onto walls which
have been covered with packing paper (soft boards), jointly
organised, structured and – once the process has been fin-
ished – glued on. In this way the conclusion which has been
reached is also available for further visualisation.
The act of writing down thoughts onto little cards which are
then pinned up for all to see allows discussions to be not only
CEFE CEFE
Additionally, the colours of the metaplan cards and the variety Metaplan cards
of forms serve to add further dimensions to working with the and flipchart
flipchart. Many trainers also use metaplan cards as a form of
documentation for lecturettes and for the development of the
material being presented by retaining the most important key
words on different coloured cards. The sequence of the col-
ours can make it simpler to assign the individual themes or
learning steps.
Notes on usage
• Use the utmost care when preparing the materials you are
going to need:
− Furthermore you may also structure many contributions in the form of lists and
CEFE CEFE
even place them opposite one another when appropriate, e.g. ideas, problems,
associations, expectations and fears, pros and cons or strengths and weak-
nesses.
CEFE CEFE
As a rule, the first opportunity within a CEFE course to cluster the card-based ques-
tionnaires is with the questions concerning the expectations and contributions of the
participants. We are going to describe two different types of clustering using an ex-
ample question:
Let’s say, for example, that you have given your participants the following question:
You then ask the participants to fill out 1 or 2 metaplan cards in response to this
question. Preferably you will gather all the cards at once and then read out each card
individually in front of all the participants, subsequently hanging each up on the pin
board. Then with each subsequent card, ask the participants if it belongs with the
cards already present on the board, or if it should be alone. In this way, together with
CEFE CEFE
your participants you will be able to construct groups of cards which we shall refer to
as clusters. You can help to guide the participants towards the subjects for which
clusters are formed by asking questions and making helpful suggestions.
You might, for example, receive the following answers in random order.
− My punctuality − My participation
− Taking that which has been learned − How to deal with a difficult customer
and applying it
− The readiness to learn something
CEFE CEFE
− My good mood
The various contributions reveal the following points in common. One topic which is
clearly quite often repeated is the readiness to take part and to be diligent within the
course. The metaplan cards displayed below produce a cluster with the name:
Individual knowledge:
Personal involvement:
This grouping or clustering of the metaplan cards makes it possible for you to see at
a glance that the participants are ready to devote their attention to the course, to
contribute their own knowledge, to become personally involved and to observe the
rules of the course. You can verbally repeat the importance of these commitments to
the success of the course, as well as remind the participants of them during the
course if necessary.
However, it is possible that an entirely different clustering structure may arise from
the discussion process with the participants:
Being there
Paying attention
Other:
When one or more cards cannot be placed with an already existing topic, an “other”
category is to be introduced. Try to ensure that the clusters produce a structure which
is useful for your purposes. In the example we have chosen here, the clusters have
to create categories with which the participants can name their personal contribution
to the course.
6.2.5 Video
Possibilities for use
The use of videos in CEFE courses is not common. To date Monitoring self
this instrument has only been used in ToTs and in this event it perception and
is very important that the trainers of the future have the op- exterior influ-
portunity to see themselves in action. Recording learning ences
situations on video allows the participants the possibility to
expand their self perception and to better control their effects
on their immediate environment. Naturally, this is not solely of
importance to the trainer; it is important for entrepreneurs as
well.
own behaviour.
You should also bear in mind, however, that producing a video The prepara-
which can be used for processing requires a certain amount tion and usage
of effort: You must record the video, view the video, perhaps require a great
even select the parts you wish to present and then cut the deal of work
tape, finally presenting it. For one thing, this means that you
cannot conduct the processing directly subsequent to the ex-
ercise, rather you will have to return to it once again that after-
noon or perhaps on the following day. You must also seek to
ensure that the utility of this video in ensuring learning success
is proportional to the effort required of you to produce it. In
other words, you should only employ videos for the visualisa-
tion of a few exercises during the course, when you wish to
place particular emphasis on the observation of behaviour. For
this purpose, however, the video is an instrument practically
without equal.
Recording
Speak to the group about any worries they might have and ask
them what they think the advantages of making a video re-
cording are. Do not insist on using video recordings if the
group is strongly against this.
Take care not to film too many scenes. You should think about
which of the expected scenes might be particularly suited for a
video recording beforehand. Place the camera on a tripod –
this prevents wobbly recordings. If you wish to change the tar-
get area of the video recording, slowly and calmly swing round
the camera. Use the zoom – but do not overuse it. Make sure
that you do not accidentally include objects or the heads of the
participants, etc., which are too close to the camera along the
lower edge of the shot. It is possible that the camera may
automatically focus on these objects – meaning that the things
you are trying to film will be out of focus.
Cutting
Then ask the ‘actors’ how they felt watching the film, what
positive or negative things they have noticed. Ask the partici-
pants what things they have noticed.
Further reading:
7 Bases of communication
In this chapter you will learn about the communication model Orientation
from Schulz von Thun. It serves as a basis model for commu-
nication. Leading on from this, the individual components of
good communication are explained.
You will see that these instructions can make life easier as a
CEFE CEFE
Idea Message
Confrontation Duplication
Attention Understanding
Intention Confirmation
Distance
CEFE CEFE
SENDER RECEIVER
In a social situation...
3. The sender now has to send the message so that it can be 3 Sending
received by the communication partner.
4. The receiver picks up the message via one or more per- 4 Picking up
ception channels: If this occurs perfectly, without any falsi-
fications, he now has an exact duplicate (a perfect copy) of
the message sent.
6. The receiver must confirm that he has received the mes- 6 Confirming
sage, i.e. he has to send a message back to the sender to
say that he has received, duplicated and understood the
message.
Confronting
Attention
munication
Intention
CEFE CEFE
Part of good communication is the intention to impart some- The task of in-
thing, and for it to be imparted in such a way that it arrives at tention
the receiver. A clear intention gives the communication em-
phasis, urgency and the ability to assert itself.
• appropriate volume;
• clarity of expression;
• receiver-oriented language.
for duplication
• the sender sends his message in such a way that it is
clearly receivable and easy to understand;
• the receiver does not falsify the message with his own in-
terpretations, assumptions or supplements.
Confirmation
A partial confirmation (look, nod of the head, an ‘aha’) is a sign Two types of
that you are listening and a request for the sender to continue confirmation
talking. A full confirmation is a sign that the message has ar-
rived and been understood.
The four sides of the message are its factual content, the Information
sender opening themselves up, the relationship and the ap- about:
peal:
CEFE CEFE
1 Factual content
2 Opening oneself up
A message does not just contain information concerning the The sender
facts but also information about the sender.
From the message, you can tell how the sender sees him-
self and how he would like to be seen by others. However,
you can also find traits in the message which the sender
himself is unaware of.
CEFE CEFE
3 Relationship
A message also shows the position of the sender in relation The relation-
to the receiver, what he thinks of him. Therefore, the mes- ship to the re-
sage also includes information concerning the relationship ceiver
between the sender and the receiver.
4 Appeal
A sender does not normally send a message, “just so”. A The desire to
message is nearly always linked with the attempt to have an influence
influence on another person. The sender does not only
want his message to be understood, he also wants it to
have an effect.
CEFE CEFE
CEFE CEFE
Both in the role as sender, when imparting knowledge and in- Observe rules
structing and guiding the exercise and the group work, and the for strength-
role of the receiver, when reacting to questions or participant ening your
behaviour, you have to know and observe the rules of good authority
communication in order to develop and maintain your author-
ity. If you can communicate properly as a trainer, the partici-
pants will increasingly find that they can communicate better
too.
CEFE CEFE
The trainer must stand in front of a group and be able to Be critical and
question himself, raise objections and criticisms and, at the composed;
same time, remain calm and composed in difficult situa- deal with dis-
tions. He must be able to deal with passivity and disinterest turbances
of participants just as well as with unrest, diversions, inter-
ruptions, misunderstandings or mistakes. He must be able
to handle the most varying characters and ways of behav-
ing.
2 The trainer should be able to direct the major part of his at- Rule 2
tention outwards, i.e. towards his listeners.
Only a small part of his attention should be directed toward Directing atten-
himself. If the trainer is well-prepared, has mastered the tion outwards
course content and only has to think a little about what he is
going to say next and not about the effect he is going to
have, he still has enough free attention which he can devote
to his participants.
He must be able to express his ideas and thoughts in a lan- Adapt the lan-
guage which can be understood by the participants. This guage to the
means that, depending on the participant group, he should participant
be able to portray the content in varying ways, in order to group.
adapt it the participants' ability to understand and also the
mood and level of feeling. This can also be included in
preparation with the target group analysis.
The trainer's main areas of expertise are the didactic struc- Be an expert in
turing of the course, steering group dynamic processes, the areas of
leading discussions and the methodical procedure in the didactics and
course. His role as an expert on individual questions of cor- communica-
porate development is a subordinate one. In every course tion.
there will be participants who know more about individual
questions than the trainer.
5 The trainer has to master all four sides of the message. Rule 5
tributions well.
The trainer should be able to completely pick up and repeat Pick up par-
participants’ contributions, correctly summarised. In par- ticipants' con-
ticular, this is repeatedly required in the phase of process- tributions and
ing and generalising the exercises. By practising, he can duplicate them
get to the stage where he can give concise summaries of well: summa-
even the longest discussion passages. With queries of ex- rise and visu-
pectations or opinions, he must be able to write these alise
statements on the flip chart at the same time, without di-
verting too much from what the participant is saying. It is
useful to master the most important visualising tech-
niques.
they have been criticised or that what they said has been
improved on.
Every participant has the basic need to be understood and Impart the
accepted. For most, it is more important to be understood feeling of hav-
than to be agreed with. Anyone who believes that they have ing been un-
not been understood tends to keep repeating their message derstood
until it “arrives”.
The trainer must also learn to understand and recognise the Picking up
hidden and secret messages of opening oneself up, the hidden mes-
relationship and the appeal side. sages
With correct confirmation the trainer can both encourage Guide partici-
shy or silent participants to talk, and stop those who are too pants contribu-
talkative. Receiving confirmation gives the participant the tions with ap-
feeling that he was right to make a contribution. The ab- propriate con-
sence of confirmation leads to aggression or resignation. firmation
The confirmation should not sound mechanical and it Find the right
should be appropriate to the message; i.e. neither “over- level
confirmation” (too much good, too much praise) nor “under-
confirmation”.
Even if the opinions which have been voiced cannot be ac- Acknowledge
cepted in every case, the participant should feel that he has other opinions
been acknowledged as a person by the trainer.
CEFE CEFE
Further reading
Schulz von Thun, Friedemann: Miteinander Reden 2, Stile, Werte und Per-
sönlichkeitsentwicklung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch
Verlag GmbH 1997.
CEFE CEFE
CEFE CEFE
With the aid of the description of the four styles, you can ana-
lyse your own behaviour as a trainer and modify it if neces-
sary.
Laissez-faire style
A trainer who prefers this style leaves the group to its own de- Few decisions,
vices. He shows very little involvement in the problems of the takes no posi-
CEFE CEFE
Authoritarian style
The effect of this style is displayed in a tense and stressful Tense relation-
relationship between the participants and the trainer, as well ship
as between the members of the group. The participants either
CEFE CEFE
For this type of trainer, the participants and their well-being are Participants
of the utmost importance. Due to their attitude, such trainers should feel
are able to create a working atmosphere which is secure and comfortable
well-meaning. The atmosphere of the training is not forced,
often it is actually cheerful. The participants’ behaviour to-
wards their colleagues and the trainer demonstrates under-
standing, goodwill and friendliness.
CEFE CEFE
Trainers who prefer this style are very concerned about the Group dynam-
problems of the participants, as well as the group dynamics. ics are in the
For them, the development of the group is of the utmost im- forefront
portance. This also satisfies their own needs (feeling of secu-
rity, avoiding conflict).
Participants often feel a personal bond with the trainer. It is Avoiding con-
very possible that the trainer’s constant efforts to maintain a flict
good relationship might lead to problems: The trainer declines
to make his own positions clear in order to avoid conflicts. This
does not allow him to do justice to the right of the participants
to be shown new ways of finding solutions.
Participative style
situation. Conflicts are solved by dealing with them openly conflict solu-
within the training. Trainers speak as equal members of the tion
group. Together, the causes of the conflict are sought. In the
course of this process, the trainer allows the participants to
pose both factual and emotional challenges. His composed
dealings with the participants help to prevent anger, insecurity
or aggression arising either from him or the group. The objec-
tive here is to seek a constructive solution to the conflict which
guarantees for the future a better way of dealing with the
problem within the seminar.
The trainer’s attitude, his interventions, explanations and be- Model charac-
haviour serve in great measure as a model character. Trainers ter and role as
are assigned the role of experts. On the one hand the expert an expert
role is related to the content (specialist knowledge within the
field in which the CEFE course is being given). On the other
hand, the expert role is drawn from the didactic problem
CEFE CEFE
For these reasons, the trainer should openly accept his or her Special status
role as an expert, and rather than hide it, the trainer should of the trainer
make constructive use of his inevitably high influence on the
learning situation. In doing so the trainer must always keep in
mind that his explanations, suggestions and comments are
given more value than those of the other participants, and
must therefore be open to criticism accordingly. He has no
right to immunity.
be useful: haviour
• Make group attitudes visible: bringing conflicts and fears to Group atti-
light, analysing the causes and presenting the effects are tudes
the first steps towards avoiding disruptive elements.
• Establish and maintain contact to the group: The trainer can Contact to the
draw conclusions about the mood within the group and group
about his or her own behaviour from the behaviour of the
participants.
Specificity
the result of deficient specificity with objectives, instructions
and questions asked.
− moralising, preaching,
− providing solutions; offering advice without being asked
to,
− providing logical arguments for emotional problems,
− judging or making excuses for an individual participant,
− praising or agreeing “from on high”,
− deriding, making a fool out of or shaming someone,
manner,
− not allowing participants the opportunity to solve their
problems themselves, instead calming and consoling
them,
− grilling, probing, asking until they say “the right thing”,
− shirking from unpleasant questions, diverting attention
and cheering them up.
participants,
− being open and showing feelings,
− exuding confidence and security while being able to talk
about your own difficulties,
− giving instructions on communicative behaviour within
the group,
− dealing with conflicts as a partner,
− giving feedback
− providing positive reinforcement for the participants’
learning steps,
− speaking in a comprehensible, practical manner, and
doing so as a partner,
− bringing together, organising, clearing up uncertainties
CEFE CEFE
and synthesising,
− promoting phases of reflection,
− pointing out the limits of discussion and emotional prox-
imity,
− seeing to it that phases of relaxation and heavy concen-
tration are alternated and linked together,
− respecting taboo zones,
− preventing sensationalism from turning into absolute
openness,
− making it clear that the participants, as well as the
trainer, have the right to make mistakes,
− remaining calm when you (the trainer) are the topic of
discussion,
− allowing participants the right to provocation within rea-
son and in accordance with the situation,
− being able to question oneself as well as the training
program.
... the old gossip cannot find the off-button and distracts you
and the rest of the group?
... a member of the group is constantly trying to show you
that he or she already knows everything and is your
match, always having the last word on whatever you say?
... an individual belongs to that tiresome category of very cu-
rious and inquiring people, inundating you with never-
ending questions?
... you have just finished a long exposition on a subject and a
person suddenly tells you that he or she didn’t understand
anything?
... there is this habit that some people always have of arriving
late and chatting loudly away, while others are used to
leaving early?
... my colleague, the co-facilitator, has just messed up his
CEFE CEFE
group?
... you suddenly find out that basic arithmetic and writing
skills are not the strongpoint of some of the participants?
... a CEFE exercise really hits a few of the participants and
leaves their psyche a little bit shaky?
... during a small group task part of its members are just sit-
ting back and observing?
... the level of knowledge and experience in a group is rather
heterogeneous?
... the technical subject in question is simply not your do-
main?
... participants think that taking the course is just the ‘en-
trance ticket’ to get what they really want: That is credit?
... your co-facilitator contradicts you openly in front of the
CEFE CEFE
whole plenary?
... external resource persons (for instant bankers) lack suffi-
cient competence or simply do not turn up?
... some group members actively practice the old maxim ‘si-
lence is golden’ and just don’t participate?
... someone refuses to take part in a particular small group?
1
Give two reasons why adults decide to attend CEFE courses.
CEFE CEFE
2
Imagine the following situation: Two people are sitting at a table, about to eat. One of
the two has cooked and is serving up the food. Both of them start to eat. Suddenly
the other person asks: "What is the green stuff in the food?” To this, the first person
replies: "Go and eat somewhere else if you don't like what I cook for you!”
CEFE CEFE
Questions:
With this example, try and explain the four sides of a message!
3
Imagine a standard CEFE course. Describe an imaginary target group and formulate
at least two learning objectives for this group using an exercise of your choice! While
formulating these objectives, take into account the different areas of behaviour.
4
CEFE CEFE
5
Which tasks are involved in processing? Use an example to describe how you would
prepare for the processing phase.
6
Have another look at the exercise Johari Window! How would you structure the
CEFE CEFE
7
How can you obtain information on the target group during the run-up, and what can
you do during the seminar to continually update and extend your knowledge of the
learning requirements of the target group?
CEFE CEFE
8
Pete now has the first week behind him and tells Paula about the last evaluation
round.
Pete: "One of the male participants really laid into one of the female participants.
She defended herself and then attacked the first participant.”
Paula: "What did you do?”
Pete: "I stopped the argument and asked the participants to start the situation
again from the beginning.”
Paula: "Did they agree to that?”
Pete: "Yes, they trusted me on it. So, the first participant said: You are always so
aggressive that you take the fun out of the constructive processing phase for
the whole course!” And the participant in question replied, “That's just not
true but you always think you're right, that really gets on my nerves!”
Paula: “That's serious stuff!”
Pete: "Yeah, I broke it up there and used that sentence to demonstrate what
happens when the rules of feedback are not observed.”
CEFE CEFE
Questions:
Which rules of feedback were disregarded in the situation described? What can you
do to avoid such situations?
CEFE CEFE
9
Pete is totally despairing:
"I have now done two exercises which, among other things, examined the subject of
looking for information. After these two exercises, I thought the participants had
achieved the learning objectives which I had formulated with regard to looking for
information. Today I used an exercise with which I wanted to achieve new learning
objectives. One of the aims of this exercise was to consolidate the results of the
previous exercises. Unfortunately, I discovered that most of the people in the group
were still not applying the knowledge from the previous exercises!”
Question:
What could be the reasons that the majority of participants still aren't looking for
information?
CEFE CEFE
CEFE CEFE
10
Pete tells Paula about his first experiences in the seminar:
Pete: "During the generalising phase I wanted to provide some additional
information but the participants didn't understand me at all! This happened
several times. I wonder if they don't want to understand me!”
Paula: "Perhaps you explained it in words which your participants don't know or
used examples which do not have anything to do with the real-life situations
of the participants!”
Question:
Which phenomenon is Paula implying? What can trainers do to avoid this problem or
to deal with it when it occurs?
CEFE CEFE
CEFE CEFE
11
What can you as a trainer do to ensure that information has a better chance of
reaching the long-term memory?
12
Describe the training style of a popular trainer you know (anonymous) and try to
CEFE CEFE
categorise this person into one of the four categories of trainer styles, identifying
elements from various trainer styles. How do you judge the trainer style which you
have just described?
CEFE CEFE