Wills and Trusts - RodDod

Wills & Trusts Outline
Rodriguez-Dod [Spring 2000] K. McMahan
INTRODUCTION
1. Key Terms §731.201

A. Will (35) - A written document properly signed that disposes of a person’s property at
death
B. Beneficiary (2) – one who receives something from a will
1. AKA - devisee
C. Codicil: A supplement which adds to, subtracts from, or modifies a will
1. note: you don’t have to change the entire will.
D. Devise (8) – gift (of real estate)or property that is distributed in a will
1. Historically it included legacy ($) and bequest; NOW all one inclusive term
E. Devisee (9) – means a person designated in a will to receive a devise.
1. In the case of a devise to an existing trust or trustee, or to a trustee of a trust
described by the will, the trust or trustee is the devisee.
a. Beneficiaries of the trust are not devisees.
F. Heirs (18) – persons who receive something from an intestate estate
G. Beneficiary – a person who receives through testate or intestate means
H. Intestate - Died without a valid will or any will at all;
1. Individual may die partially intestate if their will is incomplete in some way.
2. Circumstances where one dies testate but some of his assets are intestate
a. example: Properly prepared will that states that deceased gives his home to his
brother. However at the time of his death, decedent owns a car, bank account,
etc.
3. When you die intestate, you go through the administration of the estate, but
attorneys use this interchangeably with the term probate.
I. Testate: Died with a valid will
1. Testator is the deceased male writer of the will
2. Testatrix is the deceased female writer of a will (but we don’t really use this term
anymore)
J. Personal Representative (25) – In Florida, a person or individual or corporation in
charge who is appointed to taking care of your estate.
1. Testator nominates person and the Court approves.
K. Probate of Will (27) – all steps necessary to validate a will with the court and asking the
court to recognize it and accept it as the person’s last will
L. Property (28) – means both real and personal property or any interest in ownership of it
M. Trust (33) - A fiduciary relationship with respect to property, in which title and beneficial
ownership are separate
1. Trustee➾ Holds title to and manages the trust property for the benefit of another
person or persons, who are called the beneficiary or beneficiaries.
2. Gifts left in Wills:
A. Devise: A gift in a will that deals with Real Estate (real property);
B. Devisee: The one who received this land;
C. Legacy: A gift of money;
D. Bequest: A gift of some tangible object.
1. example: car, jewelry, artwork, stocks.
E. Today there really isn’t a distinction of the above, they are all interchanged with Devise.
Page 1 of 111
3. Receivers of gifts:
A. Beneficiary: receives the estate via the will.
1. Also called a legatee, or devisee.
B. Heir: receives by statute or law the intestate estate.
C. Note: you can be both an heir AND a beneficiary (think partially intestate).
4. “Per Capita”➾ literally means “Per Person” or “Per Head”
A. “I leave 10,000 Per Capita to Fred”
B. Requires the element of survivorship. Means that Fred has to survive the testator in
order to receive the gift and not have it lapse.
5. “Per Stirpes”➾ literally means “By the Roots”
A. The person will get the gift but, if they don’t survive the testator, the lineal descendants of
that person receive the gift evenly.
B. In Florida this is known as “Per Stirpes Distribution by Representation” and to make the
distribution at the level of people who were supposed to get the money. This is the
minority rule.
C. Florida follows the Per Stirpes Distribution method
1. Example #1➾ A gift from A to B of $10,000 Per Stirpes.
a. facts: B has 2 kids (Marvy and Renee); and B dies before A.
b. answer: each child gets $5,000
2. Example #2➾ Ann had an estate worth $200,000.
a. facts: She has 2 brothers at the time she wrote the will (Ron and Marco). Ron
has 2 daughters (Elena and Lynn); Marco has one son (Larry).
b. Assuming her brothers survive her – both Ron and Marco get the money at her
death per stripes. ($100,000 each)
c. Non Assume➾ Both Ron and Marco are dead, but their children are alive.
d. ✓Florida says to distribute at the level of who was supposed to get the money
therefore, Elena and Lynn would receive 50,000 each (1/2 of their father Ron’s
share) and Larry would receive 100,000 (his father’s share).
e. ✓The majority of states say that the 200,000 should be distributed evenly
among Lynn, Elena and Larry.
D. This can always be overcome by putting a paragraph in the will how you want the money
distributed if your beneficiaries don’t survive you.
Page 2 of 111
PROBATE PROPERTY AND PROBATE PROCEEDINGS
1. The Probate Proceeding➾

A. This is a Court proceeding that aims at having the decedent’s will viewed as valid (along
with any and all codicils).
1. If there is no will, this is referred to as an Intestate Proceeding.
2. Proceeding is generally referred to as the court “blessing” the will.
B. A will has absolutely NO meaning until the court recognizes it.
1. Note: Remember, there is no absolute legal right to give your “stuff” away at death.
C. Proceedings are Ex Parte – in behalf of only one party
D. Probate Proceedings occur in the county where the decedant was domiciled (living) §
733.101
E. Order of Probate Proceeding:
1. example: The Smiths are a couple in their 70s with 3 children & grandchildren
2. questions to ask in interview:
a. Do they want a will?
b. Do they already have a will?
c. What property do they have?
d. Where is property located?
e. Where do they live?
f. Is it community property (jointly owned w/ ½ interest to each)?
3. facts: When one dies, they want $600,000 to be split b/t their three kids/grandkids
and $1.4 M to surviving spouse. When the second dies, they want the $1.4 to go
to the 4
4. considerations: estate taxes, whether kids are descendants of both H & W, what if
any kids predecease them.
5. ORDER of Probate Proceedings:
a. Step One: Determine if there was a duly executed will or not.
b. Step Two: File will in probate court in county where Smith resided when he
died
c. Step Three: File a petition that Smith appointed W as a Personal
Representative (Executor or Executrix) in charge to handle the estate & ask
court to recognize will as a valid will.
(1) W can resign, may be someone else named in the will or someone else
can volunteer and court can approve them
d. Step Four: Gather all of the Probate Property together and itemize these
assets.
e. Step Five: Since estate is now open for administration, it is open for people to
file claims (creditors, illigitamate children).
(1) If no claims are made, personal rep collects the decedent’s assets,
makes a list of the heirs, investigates owed debts, gathers beneficiaries,
litigates on behalf of the estate, pays the taxes, finally distributes the
remaining assets
(a) If there is a will➾ Distribute the remainder
(b) If there is not a will➾ Distribute according to the intestate
statutes.
f. Step Six: Petition the court to allow you to close the estate
Page 3 of 111
F. §733.101 Jurisdiction/Venue:
1. In FL, original jurisdiction is in the Trial Court level (Circuit Court) in the county in
the state in which the decedent had his or her “domicile”.
a. Domicile is synonymous with residence.
(1) Principle Place of Abode
(a) If unclear, look towards the decedent’s intent of where he wanted
to remain.
i. example: Person owns condo in Ft. Lauderdale, but is then
placed in Nursing Home in Iowa but, retains title to condo.
NO MATTER HOW UNREALISTIC THE INTENT – if that
person intended to move back to Florida, then their venue
for probate purposes is in Broward County.
2. ORDER FOR TEST
a. First look towards:
(1) §733.101(1)(a) – Domicile
(2) §733.101(1)(b) – If no Domicile in this State, then any county that
Decedent owned Real Property.
(3) §733.101(c) – If no Domicile and no Real Property, then in any county
where a debtor of the Decedent resides.
b. Note: Under §733.101(2), a husband and wife do not have to have the same
domiciles.
G. Ancillary Proceeding
1. Proceedings that deal with property that is outside the jurisdiction of the Probate
Court.
a. Only Real Property creates this problem.
2. Such items as: Stocks, Bonds, and Bank Accounts in States where the decedent
did not live are deemed to “travel” with the decedent and thus do not suffer
through an Ancillary Proceeding.
H. §733.103 –Effect of Probate
1. Two Basic Provisions are contained in this Section:
a. §733.103(1): Technically, a will in and of itself means nothing, it does not pass
title to you upon a person’s death…the right to possess the property is
postponed until it goes through administration/probate.
b. §733.103(2): Sometimes collateral attacks are allowed for extrinsic matters (not
intrinsic), which allow individuals a chance to litigate and attack a will on its
validity.
(1) Once a will is admitted into probate, it is generally thought to be valid
and collateral attacks are not permitted
(a) It will likely be admitted if it was Duly Executed –it was signed
properly
i. Due Execution exists where:
a. It was done with competence (no duress, fraud,
mistake, undue influence)
b. It was not revoked at time of death of the decedent
(§733.103)
(2) Collateral Attacks➾
(a) Are not defined by the Statute but:
Page 4 of 111
i. Collateral Attacks are not allowed outside of the Probate

Proceeding.
ii. An attack is Collateral if you have an adequate legal
availability to attack it in probate.
(b) Example: 3rd child is left nothing in his father’s will. After Probate,
he files a claim against his two sisters for tortious interfearance of
a will.
i. NO GOOD. The 3rd child will be collaterally estopped from
raising this argument after the Probate Proceedings.
ii. Remember➾
a. ✓CAN ONLY MAKE A WILL VALID IN PROBATE;
b. ✓CAN ONLY CONTEST A WILL IN PROBATE.
2. Exceptions
a. The above example of a Collateral Attack is also an Example of Intrinsic fraud.
(1) ie: proof that decedent is coerced into signing a will, etc.
b. Whenever such intrinsic fraud is raised after probate proceeding – an estoppel
claim is raised precluding the petitioner from asserting his claim.
(1) EXCEPTION➾ If the claim is Extrinsic then the petitioner is not
estopped from asserting his claim.
(a) Example➾ Wife leaves everything to her husband and the adult
children want to contest the will based on tortious interference by
their mother’s husband. If the husband tells the kids not to bring
the claim and he’ll share with them later, and the children actually
do not go to probate court and the husband does not share – this
is Extrinsic Fraud and IS allowed after the proceeding has ended.
(b) Steps:
i. Look at who’s being defrauded
ii. If the person being defrauded is someone who could have
argued in probate (ie: named in a previous will or would be
left something in intestacy by the statutes) – then it’s
allowed.
iii. Ask: “But for the fraud, the individual would have
questioned the will in probate.”
2. What is Probate Property?

A. Definition: Probate Property includes all property, real or personal, tangible or
intangible, wherever located and solely owned by the decedent at the time of death,
except for Homestead Real Property and real estate outside of Florida.
B. Examples:
1. Business Interests - Partnership interest, stock in a closely held corporation or any
business entity, etc. is all probate property when solely owned by decedent.
a. Personal Representative is permitted to go in and audit books to determine the
decedent’s ownership value.
b. However, Pers. Rep. should immediately sell the decedent’s interest to
guarantee that the value does not decrease.
2. Cash decedent had primary control over
a. If on decedent’s person at the time of death it’s probate property
b. Same as cash in safe, in a bank, residence, vault, etc.
Page 5 of 111
c. Money in a client trust account is NOT probate property

3. Claims Against Others – intangible probate assets because right exists for
decedent to receive money
a. promissory notes, accounts receivable, pending lawsuits
4. Contract Rights
a. Frequent Flyer miles MAY be probate property if they are transferable.
(1) example: Jack owns Blackacre under a deed that allows him to keep it
as long as Jill is alive. Jack’s Personal Representative needs to
determine if Jill is alive at the time of death to see if this is included in
Jack’s probate property.
5. The right to use a famous decedent’s name or likeness may be considered
probate property.
6. Interests in Property ➾ Own may either own real estate or own interests/rights to
it.
a. Such Tenancies as Tenancy in Common are part of a decedent’s probate
estate because he owns those interests solely.
b. Interests that include a right of survivorship are NEVER part of a decedent’s
probate property. (see §689.15)
c. House that decedent owns in Florida that he rents out is Probate Property.
(1) Because not homestead property that is solely owned (§733.608)
d. Pre-paid cemetery plots are real estate (see §733.608)
e. Real Property in Florida is probate, even if there was a contract to sell
Homestead Property is initially non-probate property and must be petitioned
to the court to become probate property.
f. Co-Op in New York is Probate Property.
(1) Not considered for Homestead because it is not Real Property but it is a
share of ownership in the co-operative that are intangible personal
property wherever located.
7. Judgment Monies ➾ Awards for wrongful death become part of the decedent’s
probate estate because it was his estate that brought the action.
8. Tangible Personal Property – (things you can touch)- Inherent probate value is
based on its objectivity. Determination must be made as to if it was jointly or
individually owned.
a. Jewelry, clothing, furniture, stamps, collectible coins, art work, antiques
b. Bankbook and cash are NOT tangible because they represent something
3. What is NOT Probate Property?

A. Generally – Non Probate Property falls under the category of instruments known as “Will
Substitutes.”
B. These items are plentiful and include:
1. revocable trust;
2. life-insurance contract;
3. pension accounts;
4. joint bank or stock account;
5. rights of survivorship.
C. In these situations, a death certificate is all that is needed to transfer title.
Page 6 of 111
D. Will Substitutes differ from an ordinary “last will and testament” in three ways:
1. Most will substitutes are asset specific (each deals with a specific type of
property);
2. Such property avoids probate;
3. The formal requirements of a will (ie: attestation) do not govern will substitutes.
E. Trusts: Someone holds property for the benefit of someone else -
1. An owner of property transfers legal ownership to a trustee to hold for the benefit
of a beneficiary (considered the equitable owner)
a. Trusts are NOT probate property
b. Example➾ Grandpa puts money in a trust estate for his granddaughter. The
maintainer of this trust is the Grandfather’s son.
(1) The granddaughter is the equitable title owner of the trust and known as
the beneficiary.
(2) The son is the legal owner of the trust and is known as the trustee.
(3) If the son dies, this money is NOT part of his probate estate since he is
merely holding it for someone else’s benefit (granddaughter’s).
However if the granddaughter dies BEFORE her father, the trust is part
of the granddaughter’s probate property.
(4) Remember: Where a decedent had a fiduciary interest in an estate by
holding property for someone else as a trustee, don’t included in the
decedent’s probate property.
2. Florida presumes ALL trusts to be irrevocable.
a. It is up to the originator to reserve the right to revoke it.
3. Types of Trusts:
a. Totten Trust: bank account that decedent opens in his lifetime and names a
beneficiary, at time of death beneficiary gets it
(1) Totten Trusts are fully revocable during decedent’s lifetime but, become
irrevocable at death.
(2) This is a smooth way to get $$ outside of probate
(3) Example: JOHN DOE ITF JANE SMITH John Doe can freely spend his
money and at his death, “ITF” which means “In Trust For” simply
informs the bank to pay Jane Smith whatever is left in the account.
(a) NOTE: If Jane Smith dies before John Doe – This DOES become
probate property.
b. Intervivos Trust: Trust created during the decedent’s life
(1) Does this mean the beneficiary gets it during the life of the
c. Testimentary Trust: Trust created in the decedent’s will.
d. Grantor Trust: Recognized under Florida law and the IRS.
(1) Grantor of the trust fund makes himself the trustee and names a
beneficiary. In this respect, his wishes never go through probate (ie: he
maintains and distributes the $$ to beneficiary as HE sees fit until his
death).
e. Equitable Trust: Made by an operation of law.
(1) These are split into two categories➾ Resulting Trusts and Constructive
Trusts (there MUST be a confidential relationship present for this one).
F. Rights of Survivorship
1. Property will avoid probate on decedent’s death where it’s held as:
Page 7 of 111
a. Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship; or

b. Tenants by the Entirety with Rights of Survivorship.
2. §689.15 –In Florida if two people, who are not married, have their names on a
deed and, absent an express statement that they are to have rights of
survivorship, the court will hold that the individuals hold as Tenants in Common.
a. If a married couple wants to hold their property as Tenants in Common, they
will HAVE to have an express provision stating such.
b. SO ABSENT AN EXPRESS Right OF Survivorship, FLORIDA ASSUMES
THAT MARRIED COUPLES ALWAYS HAVE Right OF Survivorship
(1) Example➾ David and his son John own a house as Tenants in
Common. Despite dual ownership with both names on the deed, John
lives somewhere else. David, in his late years, meets Alice and marries
her and transfers his ½ interest in the house into “David and Alice as
Tenants by the Entirety with R of S”. David soon dies.
(2) David’s joint ½ interest automatically shifts to solely Alice’s after his
death. However, Alice and John own the house now as Tenants in
Common.
G. Community Property
1. Definition: All property and assets acquired by a husband and wife during the
course of their marriage, while they lived in a community property state, is
considered to belong to both spouses equally with a ½ interest to each spouse.
a. EXCEPTION: other than property acquired by devise, gift or inheritance.
2. Florida is NOT a community property state. The following are:
a. Louisiana, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Washington, Idaho, and
Nevada.
b. If clients had acquired property living in a community property state, the laws of
that jurisdiction may effect your Florida clients.
c. example: J marries S in NY (non-community property state). They
subsequently move to California (community property state) and they buy a
home in CA for $100,000 and acquire $200,000 in stock in J’s name. (So
$1.2M worth of property was acquired in community property state).
(1) They sell the CA home for $1M and put the $1M in J’s bank account
then move to Florida. J dies and is survived by S and 4 children. J’s will
cuts S out and says 4 kids get equal shares.
(2) Seems that S gets nothing BUT since they acquired $1.2M (house &
stocks) in a community property state, S gets ½ of that pursuant to the
laws of that jurisdiction. Also, those $1.2M assets DO NOT go through
probate.
(3) The other ½ is left to probate and will be distributed pursuant to the will
with ¼ interest to each kid.
(4) If will would have said to S and 4 kids, S would still receive ½ of $1.2M
and the other ½ would get divided 5 ways.
(5) NOTE: you have the option to alter your interest when you move from a
community property state.
H. Life Insurance – generally NOT a probate asset
1. Look at 3 people➾
a. The insured;
b. The owner of the insurance; and
Page 8 of 111
c. The beneficiary.
2. Generally, the owner of the insurance is also the insured and logically is not the
beneficiary as well.
a. Example #1: If the decedent’s company took out a life insurance contract on
him (as they do with executives) typically the named beneficiary is the
company, this is NOT probate property.
b. Example #2: If the decedent owned property and named his estate as the
beneficiary, this MAY be probate property.
c. Example #3: If the decedent is the insured and dies before at least one
beneficiary, this is NOT probate property.
d. Example #4: If the decedent dies after the beneficiary, and there is no
default/successor beneficiary – this SHALL be probate property.
e. Example #5: Look who killed the decedent; If the beneficiary is proven to have
in some way caused the death of the insured, then he CANNOT receive the
money.
(1) Even if criminal court does not find beneficiary guilty, the probate court
or a civil court can make its own determination as to if beneficiary killed
the decedent.
Probate Assets ( Generally)
1) All assets solely owned by the decedent

2) Excludes Homestead
3) Escludes Non-Fla. Interests in Non-Fla real estate
4) Excludes Tenancy with right of Survivorship and Tenancy By Entirety
5) Excludes Life Insurance with a beneficiary
6) Excludes property owned by decedent as a trustee.
Page 9 of 111
TAX CONSEQUENCES OF DEVISING PROPERTY
1. THIS IS NOT FROM ROD-DOD’S CLASS, THIS IS INTERESTING INFO I WANTED TO

REMEMBER
2. Amounts excludable during ones lifetime:
A. Each individual has the right to gift up to $10,000.00 every calendar year to any and as
many people as they want to without having to pay any gift taxes (by themselves or the
grantees).
1. If a husband and wife then up to $20,000.00 may be gifted tax-free every calendar
year.
a. Remember: It goes by individual and not by husband AND wife.
3. Amounts excludable by devise: (as of 1999)
A. $650,000.00 may be devised tax-free by each and every individual during one’s lifetime.
1. This amount may be in any combination of assets. (ie: homes, cars, accounts,
etc.)
2. NOTE: This amount can not be gifted to as many people as the decedent chooses
a. he is ONLY allowed $650,000.00 tax-free ONCE!
3. Husband and wife may gift 1.3 million tax free.
B. This limit is constantly changing due to inflationary rates.
1. NOTE: In the year 2006 – you may devise up to $1,000,000.00 tax-free!
C. The Unified Gift Tax Law states that this amount may be accelerated, and part or all may
be gifted by the individual now.
D. NOTE: This is in addition to the 10K/yr + 10K/yr to as many people/yr as you want.
4. Amounts excludable to your spouse:
A. You may gift as much assets as you want to your spouse free of estate or gift tax when
you die.
Page 10 of 111
DYING INTESTATE
1. Intestate: When a decedent dies without a will or without a valid will, then the estate is in
intestacy. A partially invalid will fails to give away all probate property and thus it is in partial
intestacy.
A. Only probate property passes through intestacy
B. ORDER ON TEST:
1. First, under §732.101(2) must show that the decedent is in fact dead.
a. Under §731.103(3), a person is presumed dead only after you have diligently
searched.
(1) Simply being missing may cause a problem!
2. Second, must be of a class that falls under the intestacy scheme.
a. Under §731.101(1), an heir is entitled to inherit if a person did not dispose of
property in a will.
b. Must show you qualify as an “heir”
3. Then see Who Gets What infra
C. §732.101(1)
1. Any part of the estate of a decedent not effectively disposed of by will
passes to the decedent’s heirs.
a. The Court will only distribute probate property.
2. §731.201(18) defines “Heirs” or “heirs at law” as those persons (residents, non-
residents, or aliens), including the surviving spouse, who are entitled under the
statutes of intestate succession to the property of the decedent.
a. Who survives the decedent determines who inherits.
b. This group includes blood relatives and the decedent’s surviving spouse.
c. Relatives by means of marriage (in-laws) are excluded and are not heirs.
d. Note: If a will is rendered partially invalid, the same person may be considered
a devisee AND an heir.
(1) example: Sam has $100K in bank, $5K car, $80K home = $185 probate
property
(a) He wills $20K cash plus $5K car to church
(b) He wills $50K to nephew Jerome  BUT J dies before Sam
(c) His estate is in partial intestacy…$25k properly goes to church;
Under 101(2), J cannot inherit because he didn’t survive the
decedent; thus $160k goes through intestacy because he didn’t
account for survivorship.
i. (S should have included a residuary clause in his will to
cover what he forgot to devise).
D. §732.101(2)
1. Heirs have no claims to the decedent’s property until the decedent has died.
a. An heir MUST survive the decedent in order to be considered an heir and
inherit.
2. The Intestate Proceeding
A. Who survived the decedent?
1. Surviving Spouse has the best chance of becoming an heir.
2. Lineal Heirs have the next best chance, first by far group a. then b.
Page 11 of 111
a. Lineal Descendents: Individuals related to the decedent by blood but born

AFTER the decedent (e.g. decedent’s children, grandchildren).
b. Lineal Ascendents: Individuals related to the decedent by blood but born
BEFORE the decedent (e.g. decedent’s parents, grandparents).
3. If there are no lineal ascendents or decendents, then the Court looks towards
collateral individuals.
a. Collateral Heirs: Individuals who share a common relative with you, such as
parents and grandparents.
(1) Such heirs would include brothers, uncles, and cousins.
B. ORDER ON TEST – WHO GETS WHAT
1. Is there a surviving spouse?
a. Does a legally valid marriage exist at time of death?
b. Which assets apply under §732.102 to satisfy share of spouse?
c. Is surviving spouse estopped from inheriting?
2. Are there other heirs - which assets apply under §732.103 to satisfy remaining
share of heirs?
a. Lineal descendants under 732.103(1)?
(1) Goes to nearest generation level that is living, or where dead, that have
lineal decendants
(2) Adopted under 732.108(1)?
(3) Illigitamate (born out of wedlock) under 732.108(2)?
(4) Afterborn heirs under 732.106?
(5) Half-Blood under 732.105?
b. Parents under 732.103(2)?
c. Siblings and descendants of siblings under 731.103(3)?
d. ½ each to paternal and maternal kindred under 732.103(4)?
(1) Grandma/Grandpa under 732.103(4)(a)?
(2) Uncles/Aunts and descendents of under 732.103(4)(b)?
(3) Does one side get all under 732.103(4)(c)?
e. Last deceased spouse’s family under 732.103(5)?
3. Since absolutely no one exists, how much escheats to the state under 732.107?
4. How are the gifts distributed per stirpes under 732.104?
3. §732.102 –Share of Spouse
A. Spouse must prove that at the time of death, they were legally married to the decedent.
1. Marriages entered into for ANY reason are upheld in the eyes of the intestate
statutes.
a. Evidence that married as a result of undue influence is irrelevant, marriage is
still valid; It is voidable but not void.
(1) A valid marriage may be repudiated (set aside) and the spouse is not
considered a “surviving spouse” when:
(a) Married and left spouse within a year
(b) Left spouse and married another bigamously
(c) She comes back after he dies and wants $$ (kids fought it and
proved she repudiated thus she got nothing)
2. If divorce has not been finalized (filing or contemplation of divorce), can’t block a
spouse from asserting spousal inheritance rights in intestate.
a. Separation is not a divorce thus you’re still married.
Page 12 of 111
b. Absent a final decree of dissolution of marriage from a judge, the Court will
consider a spouse a spouse. Once a decree is entered, the ex-spouse is
barred from receiving from the husband in intestacy.
B. §732.102(1)(a) – NO LINEAL DESCENDANTS
1. If no surviving lineal descendants exist, surviving spouse gets everything AT TIME
OF DEATH.
C. §732.102(1)(b) – LINEAL DESCENDANTS OF BOTH –note that the law hase changed
from 20k to 60k.
1. If surviving spouse and lineal descendents that are both his as well as those of the
surviving spouse = the spouse receives the first $60,000 of the estate VALUED
AT TIME OF DEATH plus half of what is left. The lineal descendents (most likely
children of both), all equally share the remaining half.
a. NOTE: If the first $60,000 exhausts the estate – then the kids will get nothing.
(1) example: On day decedent dies, all he has is 100 shares of stock worth
$40K
(a) If on the day it was to be distributed, the 100 shares were worth
$40K
i. The surviving spouse gets first $60K (so 50 shares) and ½
of remainder (so 25 more shares worth $10K) = $30K total
(b) If on the day it was to be distributed, the 100 shares were worth
$5K
i. The surviving spouse gets first $60K (since at the time of
death the estate was valued at $40K that meant only 50
shares). However, the current value of those 50 shares is
only $2500 but that’s life.
ii. Additionally, she also receives ½ the remaining estate
(since at the time of death the remaining estate was
valued at $20K which was 25 shares), surviving spouse
gets now only 25 shares worth only $1250 (since now ½
the remaining estate, or 50 shares, is only worth $2500).
iii. Thus, surviving spouse gets a total of $3750 = ($2500 +
$1250) and the lineal descendants get nothing.
b. example: Joe & Susan have $120K, no will, and one child  Karen
(1) Surviving spouse gets first $60 plus ½ the remaining $100K = ($20 +
$50) = $70K
(2) Karen gets $50K (if more kids, same but kids share determined under
§732.103)
D. §732.102(1)(c) – ONLY LINEAL DESCENDANTS OF DECEDENT
1. If the decedent is survived by a spouse and lineal descendents – one or more of
whom are not lineal descendents of the surviving spouse = the spouse receives
half of the probate estate AT TIME OF DEATH and the decedent’s remaining
lineal descendents split equally the rest.
a. example: Joe & Susan have $120K, no will, and one child  Karen; and Joe
had Stan from a previous marriage to Amy.
(1) Joe dies:
(a) Susan (surviving spouse) gets first $20 plus ½ the remaining
$100K = ($20 + $50) = $70K
Page 13 of 111
(b) Karen & Stan (surviving lineal descendants) split remaining $50K
according to §732.103 since both are whole-blood descendants.
(c) Amy (ex-spouse) doesn’t get a thing
(2) Susan dies:
(a) Joe (surviving spouse) gets first $20 plus ½ the remaining $100K
= ($20 + $50) = $70K
(b) Karen (surviving lineal descendant) & Stan split remaining $50K
according to §732.105 since Stan is a half-blood.
(c) Amy (ex-spouse) doesn’t get a thing
E. Estoppel of Spousal Rights
1. Actions of spouse must be so egregious that a spouse waives their rights under
§732.102.
a. example: Spouse married MANY individuals is estopped from getting any of
their deceased spouse’s money.
F. Cases:
1. Marvin v. Marvin (page 87), Jones v. Daly (page 98)
2. Whorton v. Dillingham (page 101): Decedent dies leaving no spouse only a gay
lover. The lover knows that they can’t assert §732.102 rights in intestate, nor are
they a blood relative of the decedent so they try to sue the decedent’s estate
arguing a breach of contract.
a. Argument: Petitioner will argue that in exchange for aiding, helping, cooking,
etc. for the decedent, they were going to be left something.
b. Holding: Court says that the if the consideration for these services was in
sexual favors then it is an unenforceable contract however, if you could
separate a sexual relationship from those other duties and still find substantial
consideration to form a valid contract then – you may sue the estate.
4. §732.103 – Share of Other Heirs
A. Absent a surviving spouse or the portion of the estate left after §732.102 will go to:
1. §732.103(1) Decedents lineal descendents (children, grandchildren) equally;
a. Surviving spouse of a child who predeceases surviving spouse has no rights to
inherit.
2. §732.103(2) Absent lineal descendents, to the decedent’s mother and father
equally (or their survivor);
a. “or their survivor” means if only one parent, they get entire estate.
b. You cannot inherit from your in-laws, your in-laws may not inherit from you
3. §732.103(3) If none of the above, then to the decedent’s brothers and sisters and
the descendents of their deceased brothers and sisters (neices and nephews);
4. §732.103(4) If none of the above, then divide the decedent’s estate in half and
distribute one half to the decedent’s paternal descendents and the other half to his
maternal descendants in the following manner:
a. To their grandmother or grandfather equally (or to their survivor);
b. If no grandmother or grandfather then to aunts and uncles and descendents of
deceased aunts and uncles (cousins);
c. If there are no grands or aunts and uncles on one side (maternal or paternal),
then the estate will go to the side that has relatives that fit the above scheme.
5. §732.103(5) If none of the above, it will be divided as to the last deceased
spouse’s kindred, as if the spouse had survived the decedent and died intestate.
Page 14 of 111
5. §732.107 – Escheat (State’s Share)

A. If absolutely no one – then the estate escheats (reversion of intestate estate w/o heirs) to
the state.
1. This money will go to the state school fund.
2. Court allows 10 years after a Personal Representative has been named for
someone to come forward and claim the money.
6. §732.104 – Distribution of Money (what shares do they get?)
A. Two Methods
1. Per Capita – means per head
a. You must survive to get the gift
b. Majority of states (but not FL) have per capita with per stirpes representation
(1) Look at who is alive AND anyone dead w/ people living underneath
them and divide by that many people
2. Per Stirpes – Florida Statutes
a. You do not have to survive to get the gift (survivorship not required).
b. Descendants of a deceased take by representation the share that the
deceased person would have taken had he survived to be an heir
c. In FLORIDA, (§732.104) - distribution of estate proceeds are done in a per
stirpes fashion to lineal descendents or collateral descendents.
(1) Look at living people OR dead w/ people living beneath them
(a) Divide at the nearest generation level
i. example: A (deceased) has two brothers, B & C whom are
nearest to A, not alive but have people under them.
a. [B] has 3 kids b1, b2, b3
b. Also [b1] is dead but had 2 kids b1-1, b1-2
c. [C] has 1 kid c1
d. [B] gets ½ but since he’s dead
♦ b1 gets 1/6, b2 gets 1/6, b3 gets 1/6
♦ b1-1 gets 1/12, b1-2 gets 1/12
e. [C] gets ½ but since he’s dead
♦ c1 gets ½
ii. example: Assume decedent dies without a will. The Court
determines that the only people able to become heirs of
his estate are his three siblings (A, B and C). Decedent
had an estate of $90,000.00.
a. [A], B and C would each receive $30,000.00;
b. Assume that [A] is dead but has two children a1, a2.
Pursuant to §732.103(3) as well as §732.104,
♦ each of those children would receive $15,000.00
♦ B and C would each get $30,000.00.
7. Rights of Other Individuals
A. §732.106 Afterbornes: are Heirs of the decedent that are conceived before his or her
death but born thereafter.
1. Under §732.106 these heirs inherit intestate property as if they were born during
the decedent’s lifetime and
Page 15 of 111
a. However this exception ONLY applies to children of the decedent.

(1) example: H impregnated W before he died. W gave birth to [H]’s son S
sometime after his father and grandpa died.
(a) S may inherit from both father and grandfather
(b) W would not inherit from grandfather because she is not blood
relative, she is just a daughter in-law
(c) Any other kids W had with other men cannot inherit from father or
grandpa because exception only applies to decedent’s afterborn
heirs.
B. §732.105 Half-Bloods: are individuals that share one common parent but not both.
1. Generally, this is applied to determine how much a half –brother will inherit from
step-brother that died (could be that there are other step-children still living)
2. Under §732.105, heirs that are half bloods get ½ the gift that whole bloods get.
a. Formula to find out each share for a half-blood or whole-blood:
(1) Add each H and W shared by each child
(2) Add the total number of Ws and Hs
(3) Divide how many parents each child shared with the kid that died by this
total
(4) Finally, divide that number by amount dead kid left
(a) Example➾ Alice and Bob marry, and have a three kids, C, D and
E. Bob soon dies, and Alice remarries to Fred. Alice and Fred
have a kid, T. All parents die, then C dies. C has $50K. Does T
have a right to inherit from C? Yes, he has the same mother,
he’s a half blood.
(5) How much does each child get?
(a) D has one W and one H = 2
(b) E  has one W and one H = 2
(c) T  has only one W = 1
(6) The sum of Ws and Hs is (2+2+1)= 5
(7) Divide 5 by # each kid has, then take that share from dead kids estate
(a) D 2/5 of 50K = 20K
(b) E  2/5 of 50K = 20K
(c) T  1/5 of 50K = 10K
C. §732.108(1) - Adopted Persons
1. For the purpose of intestate, adopted children are treated as lineal descendents of
the adopting parent and is one of the natural kindred of the all member’s of the
adopting parent’s family.
2. This child is NOT a lineal descendent of his or her natural parents, nor is he or she
one of the kindred of the natural born family, or any prior adopted family. He’s cut
off to all but his adoptive family.
3. EXCEPT THAT three ways exist where an adopted child CAN still inherit from their
natural parents:
a. §732.108(1)(a) – PARENT REMARRIES
(1) Adoption of a child by the spouse of a natural parent has no effect on
the relationship between the child and the natural parent or the natural
parent’s family.
Page 16 of 111
(a) example: Assume Sam has two natural parents, Mom and Dad.
However, Sam’s parents divorce and dad runs off when Sam is
three. Soon after Sam’s Mom marries again, and that person
wishes to adopt Sam.
i. Sam may still inherit from his mother and mother can still
inherit from Sam.
b. §732.108(1)(b) – WIDOW REMARRIES
(1) Adoption of a child by a natural parent’s spouse who married the natural
parent after the death of the other natural parent has no effect on the
relationship between the child and the deceased natural parent’s family.
Unfortunately, Sam’s father dies and the surviving spouse
remarries and that new parent adopts Sam. Sam’s natural dad’s
mother dies.
i. Sam may inherit from his natural father’s family even
though he has been adopted, because the family didn’t
give up their rights when father accidentally died.
(2) Basically, §732.108(1)(a) does not require death of a parent; whereas
§732.108(1)(b) does require death – However, the same results ensue.
[????WHAT SAME RESULTS????]
c. §732.108(1)(c) – CLOSE RELATIVE ADOPTS
(1) adoption of a child by a close relative has no effect on the relationship
between the child and the families of the deceased natural parents.
Unfortunately both die. Soon after Sam is adopted by a “close
relative”.
i. Sam may inherit from his natural parents as though he
wasn’t adopted…additionally, Sam may inherit from his
adoptive parents as well.
(2) §63.172(2) defines close relatives as sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles,
etc.
4. Public Policy➾ Courts want to encourage adoption, and give children a “fresh
start.”
5. Examples:
a. facts: A & B were married, they divorced, they had two children that B now has
custody of. The both remarry and have one child each.
(1) A–B  x and y
(2) A–D v
(3) B–C z
b. hypos:
(1) C dies intestate, x and y are only step-kids and they were never adopted
so they don’t inherit from C. B gets first $20K plus ½ of remainder, z
gets other ½
(2) A, B, C, D and x die. Y is a whole blood. v and z are half-bloods. They
will all inherit they are all blood related to x.
Page 17 of 111
(3) C dies intestate, C had adopted x and y. B gets first $20K, plus ½ of the
remainder. x, y, z are all now lineal descendants of B and C. The
remainder is distributed to them equally.
6. Virtual/Equitable Adoption: This occurs when individual promised to adopt a
child, but never get a chance to before they died but was cared for as a “mother”
would.
a. Here, a child will receive from the court the RIGHTS of an adopted child to
inherit from equitably adoptive parents SHALL NOT make you adopted.
(1) Since this is not a real adoption, it does not take away rights to inherit
from natural family.
(2) Equitably adoptive child CANNOT inherit from adoptive parents’
ascendants or descendants, only from that mother and father.
b. In order to assert this you need:
(1) A promise to adopt (oral or written);
(2) Part Performance (treated kid as a natural child); and
(3) Foster Parents to die intestate.
c. remember – Virtual Adoption ONLY EXISTS in INTESTATE situations.
d. example: Gina and Fran are two best-friends. Gina is a widow with two small
children. Fran is married to Jack. Gina has Fran and Jack promise to take care
of Gina’s two small children should anything happen to her. Gina even takes
out a $1,000,000.00 life insurance policy on her life naming Fran and Jack as
the beneficiaries. This money is designed to provide for Gina’s two small kids.
Gina also puts her home in both her name as well as Fran and Jack’s.
Unfortunately Gina dies. The two small kids go to Fran and Jack. The two do
all that they were supposed to but, never adopt the children. The kids grow up
and are adults and Fran and Jack die intestate.
(1) result: Under statutory scheme, children could not inherit from Fran &
Jack but under the common law claim of virtual adoption, they would be
treated as though they were adopted allowed to inherit
(2) procedure: The two kids will have to sue Fran and Jack’s estate for
specific performance or breach of contract of the contract between their
natural mother and Fran and Jack in that the kids were never adopted.
Here, they are only asking for the rights of adopted children.
(3) Courts have stated that adult individuals that grew up like this, but have
become estranged from “Fran and Jack” may STILL go through a Virtual
Adoption proceeding to get money through intestate.
(a) However, one Florida case even says that Virtually Adopted
children’s rights extend to Homestead.
D. §732.108(2) - Born Out of Wedlock.
1. General Rule Regarding Illegitimate Children: As long as paternity is established
and there is no other provision stating otherwise, illegitimate children MAY claim
from their natural parents.
2. Florida says that if parents are married at time of birth you are considered
legitimate.
a. Person is natural child of a man the mother is married to at the time of
conception; look at the statute at the time mother dies
Page 18 of 111
b. Example➾ Ann and John are not married and conceive a baby. Soon after,
John leaves and Ann marries Ted. They are married for one week before Ann
and John’s baby is born.
(1) This baby IS legitimate – it doesn’t matter if the baby’s mother marries
someone other than the natural father as long as there is a marriage at
time of birth.
3. IMPORTANT NOTE➾ As soon as a child is adopted (ie: by mother’s new
husband), §732.108(2) has NO RELEVANCE, and we are only concerned with
§732.108(1)
a. §732.108(2) ONLY pertains when child remains illegitimate.
b. Parent or child may establish illegitimacy; distant relatives precluded from
doing so
c. Prior adjudications of a child’s legitimacy do not pertain here and each case is
reviewed de novo.
(1) Florida Statutes 95.11(3) creates a four year statute of limitations to
assert legitimacy in an intestate proceeding.
4. Under §732.108(2), children born OUT of wedlock:
a. Are lineal descendents of their mother (since you know who that is)
b. As for the father, may become lineal descendants of their father only IF:
(1) §732.108(2)(a) – NATURAL PARENTS MARRY
(a) If natural parents at any time get married, the child then becomes
legitimate and a lineal descendant of the father.
i. Divorce or annulments in these situations do not have a
retroactive effect.
a. Florida does not recognize common law marriages for
this purpose.
(2) §732.108(2)(b) –FATHER’S PATERNITY PROVEN IN COURT
(a) If child proved in court paternity of the father, either before or
after the father’s death, the child is considered a lineal desendant
of the father.
i. If child attempts this after the father’s death, the burden of
proof is clear and convincing evidence, which is VERY
difficult to prove.
ii. If child attempts this while father is alive, the burden of
proof is by preponderance of the evidence.
(3) §732.108(2)(c) – FATHER’S PATERNITY IN WRITING
(a) If the father acknowledges paternity in a sufficient writing, then
the child is considered a lineal descendant.
i. The Courts on a case-by-case basis determine the
sufficiency of the writing.
a. example: If individual sets up a trust fund and writes,
“the beneficiary shall be my son James Smith”, this is
sufficient for the Courts to establish paternity.
8. §732.601 - Simultaneous Death Act–

A. Occurs when there is insufficient evidence that the persons involved have died any other
way but simultaneously. This is an important concept because determining who dies first
can drastically alter who is distributed what through intestacy.
Page 19 of 111
B. ORDER ON TEST:
1. First, §732.601(5) states that the provisions contained in §732.601 ONLY pertain
when persons’ assets go through intestate proceedings.
2. Second, under §732.601(3) whatever was owned joint must be divided and kept
separately.
a. Look at each decedent (husband and wife) and assume the one predeseaced
the other
3. If you can’t determine which heir dies first, §732.601(2) requires assets be divided
equally among heirs as if each beneficiary had survived the other.
a. Look at each decedent (husband and wife) and assume the one predeseaced
the other
4. If the insured and the beneficiary of a life insurance policy die simultaneously,
§732.601(4) assumes the insured survived the beneficiary (pretends beneficiary
dies first)
C. Determining who died when:
1. Time of death on a Death Certificate is not always correct and is only prima facie
evidence as to the order of death. Look further.
2. You must introduce sufficient evidence to show that one died before the other.
a. Proof here is through preponderance of the evidence.
3. Courts will look towards circumstantial evidence in an attempt to ascertain which
individual survived the other.
a. Examples: Order of bodies found in a burning house closest to the door might
mean that they were the last to die; temperature of bodies; murder/suicide (he
killed everyone first before himself); position of bodies, etc.
4. Florida states that survival by one second is enough to have out-lived someone,
then you do not have a simultaneous death.
D. How to distribute the property:
1. §732.601(1) – Probate Property should be disbursed as if each spouse survived
the other, except as provided otherwise.
a. Example: William and Sara are married. Together they have a child, Eric.
Sara also has a child from a previous marriage named Frank. William has a
bank account solely in his name in the amount of $100,000.00. Sara has a
bank account solely in her name in the amount of $120,000. Assume that
William and Sara die simultaneously.
(1) For purposes of William’s estate, according to §732.601(1), FL Sim
Death Act requires that you treat his assets as if he survived Sara,
meaning that his wife was dead before he died. In this case, William
only has one lineal descendent, Eric, so Eric gets all $100,000.00
(2) Now, for purposes of Sara’s estate, under FL Sim Death Act, we pretend
he died before his wife. When she outlives her husband she has two
lineal descendents, Eric and Frank. Each will get $60,000.00.
(3) In conclusion: Eric gets $160,000.00 and Frank gets $60,000.00
2. §732.601(2) – Right of Survivorship assets should be divided into as many equal
parts as there are successive beneficiaries, and those parts shall be distributed as
if each beneficiary had survived the other.
a. Example: William and Sara also owned a home as joint tenants with rights of
survivorship. They died simultaneously and without a will. The home was
valued at $200,000.00
Page 20 of 111
(1) William: according to §732.601(2) we must divide the property into as

many equal parts as there were beneficiaries. There were two
beneficiaries – William & Sara, so we divide the home in half (ie:
$100,000.00 to William and $100,000.00 to Sara). Next we treat each
share as if they survived the other beneficiary. So the same result
occurs as it did above – Eric gets all $100,000.00.
(2) Sara: same treatment as above, her share goes to her two lineal
descendents, Eric and Frank taking $50,000.00 each.
b. Note➾ If there are three names and they each have rights of survivorship, and
only two die simultaneously, then the third beneficiary takes EVERYTHING
because the property doesn’t enter probate property.
3. §732.601(3) – Property owned jointly should be distributed one half as if one had
survived, and one half as if the other had survived. If there are more than two joint
tenants then, the property should be distributed in the proportion that each one
bears to the whole number of joint tenants.
a. Example: William and Sara own a condo on the water. The condo is appraised
at 1,000,000.00. They own the condo as joint tenants and die simultaneously.
(1) Once again split it in half and distribute according to the intestate
statutes.
4. §732.601(4) – Life Insurance. When the insured and the beneficiary in a policy of
life or accident insurance have died simultaneously, then the proceeds of the
policy shall be distributed as if the insured had survived the beneficiary.
a. Basically – the proceeds become probate property in the insured individual’s
estate.
LOSS OF RIGHTS TO AN INTESTATE SHARE

9. §732.801 – “disclaiming” one’s interest (in either intestate or probate proceeding)
A. “Disclaim”➾ Voluntary relinquishment of a beneficiary’s rights.
B. You will be treated as if you predeceased that person.
C. Such rights may be waived either before or after the decedent dies.
D. You may disclaim all of your interest or part of their interest.
1. ie: “I disclaim all but 100,000” or “I disclaim 50%”, etc.
E. How to distribute “disclaimed” wealth:
1. §732.801(3)(a) states that absent another provision in the decedent’s will for how
to distribute wealth such there be a disclaimer, the property left to the disclaiming
beneficiary should be treated as if the disclaimer died before the decedent and
therefore has their disclaimed property pass through them per stirpes to their
descendents – However, this depends on the wording of the disclaimer.
a. Most disclaimers are used for tax purposes (ie: someone has enough wealth,
so they pass the money on to their children).
b. However, can’t disclaim wealth to cheat creditors. (ie: someone who’s insolvent
can not disclaim)
F. Requirements to Disclaim:
1. §732.801(4)(a) – Disclaimer must be done in writing, describe the interest in the
property disclaimed, and be signed, witnessed, notarized, and acknowledge in the
manner provided for the conveyance of real property.
Page 21 of 111
a. Signed by person disclaiming, 2 witnesses (with legibly typed names) that have
either seen the person disclaiming sign their name OR they attest that it is that
person’s signature.
2. §732.801(4)(b) – Disclaimer is irrevocable when recorded with the clerk of the
county in which the estate is being administered. If no proceeding has begun yet,
it is irrevocable if recorded by the clerk of any county in which a proceeding could
be administered.
a. Remember – ONCE FILED IT IS IRREVOCABLE!
3. §732.801(4)(c) – Disclaiming person must deliver or mail a copy of the disclaiming
instrument to the personal representative, or any other person having legal title to,
or possession of the property in which the disclaimed interest exists.
4. §732.801(5) – Disclaimer may be filed at any time after the creation of the interest
however, it must be filed:
a. Within 9 months of the decedent’s death; or
b. If the disclaimer is not yet ascertained as a beneficiary OR the disclaimant’s
interest has not become fixed both in quantity and quality at the death of the
decedent, then the disclaimer must be filed within 6 months of the event that
would cause him or her to be fully apprised of their interest in both quality and
quantity.
G. Persons Disclaiming on another’s behalf:
1. §732.801(9) – Disclaimer may be made for a minor, incompetent, incapacitated
person, or deceased beneficiary by the guardian or personal representative (ie:
Power of Attorney) of such person. However, such disclaimer can be only be
made if:
a. Such Disclaimer is in the best interest of the disclaiming party, AND
b. Such Disclaimer is in the best interest of the party to take the disclaiming
parties interest.
2. Example: Mary is 80 and suffers from dementia. Her estate is worth over 1 million
dollars, so her power of attorney knows that she does not need any more money
so files disclaimer on her behalf.
3. Example: Bill is 99 and has an estate worth over 1 million as well. He also
recognizes that he does not need the money and decides to disclaim as well.
H. Example of Disclaimer
1. Frank is a widow and has three adult children: Albert, Barbara and Chris. Frank
has an estate worth $900,000.00. Assume that Chris has enough of his own
personal wealth and instead wishes for his children to be taken care of, so he
disclaims his interest prior to his father’s death.
a. Normally, Albert, Barbara and Chris each would have received $300,000.00
from Frank. Now Chris’ interest is passed per stirpes to his two children,
George and Gina as if he predeceased Frank, in the amount of $150,000.00
each. (note that these two children must be blood grandchildren of Frank’s, or
related by adoption, etc.)
10. §732.802 – Killer (Slayer) Statutes:
A. A surviving person who unlawfully and intentionally kills or participates in procuring the
death of the decedent is not entitled to any benefits under the will or under the Florida
Probate Code, and the estate of the decedent passes as if the killer had predeceased the
decedent.
Page 22 of 111
1. Note: Conduct must be both intentional and unlawful – this is a conjunctive test
so, argue both.
2. A final judgement of conviction of murder in any degree is enough to satisfy this
provision. However, absent such decree, evidence presented that shows murder
by a preponderance is acceptable, and will be viewed de novo.
3. Also note that a judgment of “not guilty” DOES NOT satisfy this statute, and a
separate trial may be held in the proceeding.
B. Note: This statute applies to both probate and intestate proceedings.
C. Example: Blackare, a 10 ace plot of land was purchased by Dave and Wally for 2 million
dollars. Each investor put in 1 million dollars. Both Dave and Wally own this land as Joint
Tenants with Rights of Survivorship. Wally then intentionally and unlawfully caused the
death of Dave.
1. Some say that Wally should get nothing but, Florida Statute says:
a. “Make the wrongdoer forfeit his right of survivorship.” Basically, severe the r of
s relationship and make the relationship one of Tenants in Common.
2. Now, Wally only looses the right to take over the entire acreage but, maintains his
50% share.
11. Heir’s Liability –
A. An heir’s debt to a decedent may effect the intestate share to which the heir was entitled
B. §732.109 allows the personal representative to hold back that sum to repay the debt
C. Exceptions:
1. Debts are personal to you –
a. Example: if you owe a debt to your father, never pay it off and die before your
father, you child inherits full share; your debt is not deducted from your child’s
share
2. Title doesn’t pass to you until it is transferred to you
a. A creditor does not have greater rights than you do, they cannot collect on
debts owed to them directly from the personal representative, they must wait
until your inheritance is distributed to you
(1) Sometimes creditors can get an injunction so you cannot defraud them
by transferring it to someone else once you get it
12. REMEMBER: If no one stands to inherit because there is no will and no known living heirs,
or beneficiaries have lost their right, §732.107 says that the estate shall escheat to the state
(state gets it)
13. Recap:
A. Ways to loose rights in intestacy:
1. Divorce;
2. Intentionally cause the death of another;
3. Disclaimer;
4. Adoption;
5. Illegitimacy, etc.
B. Probate Proceedings:
1. If, during the administration of an Intestate Proceeding, a valid will is found, then
the estate goes to probate and out of Intestate.
a. This MUST happen while Probate Proceeding is open and ongoing.
Page 23 of 111
b. Under §733.208(5) if probate has been closed after distribution, nothing you
can do; no remedies are available to you.
(1) even if another will is found after Probate has been closed, the
finalization of the previous administration stands.
Page 24 of 111
WILLS
1. Effectuating a Will – Note: the following pertains ONLY to Florida law---Colorado is not
included.
A. §731.201(35) – A will is “an instrument, including a codicil, executed by a person in the
manner prescribed by this code, which disposes of the person’s property on or after his
or her death and includes an instrument which merely appoints a personal representative
or revokes or revises another will.”
Testamentary in Character
Revoked or Amended during the Testator’s Lifetime
No Legal Effect until the Testator dies
B. Rod-Dod’s Definition- A revocable instrument that is testamentary (effective at testator’s
death).
1. A document operating during lifetime is not a will
2. Writing doesn’t actually have to leave something. It can appoint a personal
representative and your property would be distributed through intestacy.
C. §732.501 – Who may make a will
1. Any person 18 years or older, AND of sound mind may make a will.
D. Testamentary Intent
1. Testator must have Present Testamentary Intent when they executed the will.
a. Means testator intends it to be a will;
b. Lack of Testamentary Intent could invalidate a particular gift but, maybe not the
entire will.
(1) Example: Husband had a girlfriend and wanted to get her to sleep with
him, so he had his attorney draft up a will (which the attorney knew the
husband did not intend to be valid) which left the girlfriend everything.
He untimely died after that, and the girlfriend tried to enforce the will.
However, the wife brought in the attorney to show the court a lack of
intent, and the wife won.
2. The Court will look at the “four-corners” of the will to make their determination.
a. EXCEPTION: If an ambiguity exists as to the testator’s intent, Courts will allow
extrinsic evidence.
(1) example: Person signs will on death-bed and knows that they aren’t
getting better, when they sign a will, it can be inferred that they mean for
this to operate as a will.
E. In FL, execution must be in strict compliance
1. Under §732.502(1), execution of a will must be in writing and contain:
a. Testator’s signature:
(1) Must appear at the end of the instrument; or
(a) By the term “end of the will”, it is meant – the end of the
substantive part of the will (after all is disposed) and not
necessarily the physical end of the will.
(b) Florida states that even scribble or a mark is sufficient to
constitute a signature – it doesn’t have to be a legal signature.
(2) Testator’s name may be signed by someone who
(a) has the testator’s direction to do so, and
Page 25 of 111
(b) does so in the presence of the testator.

i. Presence requirement
a. Minority requires testator to actually be “in the line of
vision”
b. Majority (FL) broadly applies Conscious Presence Test
– testator must know what other is doing, but don’t
have to see him doing it
(c) Testator may acknowledge to the witnesses that he signed the
will
i. May have acknowledgement by silence
a. If will is already signed by testator, and he asks
witnesses, “will you sign my will?” that is enough
b. Two Witnesses must be in the presence of testator that can attest to

(1) The testator’s signing, or
(2) acknowledge
(a) That he previously signed the will; or
(b) That another person has signed testator’s name to it
(3) POLICY for having two witnesses is that it protects against fraud or
coersion….unlikely that two people would hold a gun to your head and
threaten you to sign.
c. Witnesses’ signatures:
(1) Attesting witnesses must sign the will in testator’s presence; and
(2) in the presence of each other
(a) example: A testator can either sign in front of the witnesses or
sign at home and acknowledge to the witnesses himself that he
either signed the will himself or that he authorized someone to do
it for him. Line of vision test v. conscious presence test are the
two major tests. In Florida, use line of vision, since case law
does not specify.
(b) NOTE: Timing - In FL for will to be properly executed, strict
compliance requires witnesses to sign in presence of the testator.
i. Rule: A witness may sign a will within a reasonable length
of time after the Testator signs the will.
ii. The In Re Estate of Peters Court did not specify what was
a reasonable amount of time however, a witness signing
after a testator has died is unreasonable.
(c) Witnesses may sign anywhere
2. REMEMBER: There are 3 presence requirements for the signing of the will:
a. The testator must sign it in the presence of the witnesses
b. The witnesses must sign it in the presence of the testator.
c. The witnesses must sign it the presence of each other.
3. NOTE: A will does not need to be notarized
4. §732.504 Who may be a Witness ( also called Subscribing Witnesses )
a. Any competent person
(1) Incompetent when either:
(a) incapable of expressing themselves in a manner in which they
would be understood
Page 26 of 111
(b) incapable of understanding

b. Anybody not precluded by law
c. Even interested parties may be a witness
Rule 90.601 states that every person may be a witness
Rule 90.603 states that a person who is incapable to express himself in a way that
is understood can be a witness.
F. §732.502(4) – Codicil (amendment to the will) must be executed in the same manner
as a will.
G. NOTE: Nothing in Florida Statutes precludes people from witnessing a will that they
signed on the testator’s behalf (see §732.504(2))
1. However, this really isn’t smart – especially if such a person is a beneficiary of the
will.
2. Even convicted felons could witness a will.
2. Additional Safeguards
A. Publication of a Will
1. Is a requirement that the testator must inform (or have someone else inform) the
witnesses that they’re about to sign a will.
2. Really means reading a will to a witness so they know their signing the testator’s
will.
3. Florida does not require this.
a. In FL, witness only needs to know the person is freely, voluntarily signing the
will and is of sound mind.
B. Attestation Clause
1. They’re located immediately below the testator’s signature, and really mean that
the procedure of executing the will is strictly being adhered to (see page 176).
2. Although no state requires the use of an attestation clause as a prerequisite to
validity, lawyers routinely use them because they raise a rebuttable presumption
that the events recited therein actually occurred.
3. Benefits of an Attestation Clause:
a. May be used to refresh a witness’ recollection at a later time;
(1) Used so that even if a witness can no longer remember witnessing the
will, the clause stands for that they wouldn’t have committed fraud.
b. Prima facie evidence that the will was duly executed, but only prima facie
effective so may be rebutted.
(1) This clause doesn’t replace testimony witnesses must give BUT:
(a) Courts hold that absent contrary testimony, if a witness is now no
longer available, you may be able to get the will to probate
anyway.
(2) Clause can be used to impeach a witness that claims that no one else
was present at the signing of the will.
(a) Court sometimes holds the weight of this clause over the weight
of a witness’ testimony.
C. §732.503 Self-Proving affidavit
1. NOTE: This suggested language is not required in FL (but it may for Colorado??)
2. Testator and both witnesses must go before a notary public and once again attest
to the fact that all requirements were conformed to (i.e. sound mind, in each others
presence) in the execution of the will.
Page 27 of 111
3. Preventative purpose is so when testator dies, you don’t need to track down all of
the witnesses, that’s why to be held effective, it must be notarized. (may be signed
anywhere)
a. NOTE: If a notary is a witness to the will, they can’t notarize the will
themselves because you cannot notarize yourself.
4. May be signed after death
3. OTHER TYPES OF WILLS

A. Holographic Wills: A will written solely in the testator’s own handwriting and signed by
the testator.
1. This type of will needs no form requirements (i.e. need NOT be witnessed.)
2. Holographic wills are NOT permitted in Florida – even if it was recognized as valid
in other jurisdictions.
a. However, Florida does state that:
(1) If a testator has a holographic will from another state, and moves to
Florida, FL will enforce that will if:
(a) signs a codicil conforming to the laws of the State of Florida, and
(b) it expressly states that they like their will from the other state.
i. However, Florida will not even allow a testator to amend a
previously valid will with a holographic or noncupative
document.
(2) Even though it’s invalid as a holographic will, if it adheres to ALL of the
formalities of a Florida will (by meeting testator & witness signature
requirements), then it will NOT be considered holographic and may go
through probate as a valid will.
(a) In Re Estate of McKellar
i. Decedent hand wrote will & signed it in the beginning
ii. Witnesses didn’t see the signature at the end
iii. Ct held will invalid as a holographic will
(b) In Re: Estate of Black
i. Testator used three copies of a pre-printed formed will in
which to draft her own will. She wrote the substantive
portions of the will in her handwriting.
ii. In determining whether this constituted a holographic will
or not, Court held that it was holographic in order to further
the policy that Courts prefer testatcy over intestacy and
that the testator’s only mistake of using some of the
wording of the pre-printed form did not rise to the level of
invalidating the entire well-planned will.
iii. Note: Florida would not have upheld this will as valid.
B. Noncupative Wills: 732.502 (2) Is an orally made will.
1. Florida does NOT recognize such wills, though enforceable in other states
a. POLICY: There is too much room for fraud and deception.
Page 28 of 111
4. §732.502(2) Non-Residence Wills

A. Any will or codicil, other than a holographic or noncupative will, executed by a
nonresident of Florida is valid as a will in Florida provided that this same will:
1. was valid under the laws of the state or country where the testator was at the time
of execution.
2. REMEMBER➾ A holographic will that also conforms with ALL Florida
requirements of a will, in Florida’s eyes is not considered a holographic will and
therefore could be enforced from another state or country.
B. NOTE: §732.502(2) only refers to procedural matters and not substantive matters.
1. Example➾ In New York you can leave your home to someone else even if you are
married and have minor children. If you move to Florida, that part would not be
enforced because in Florida you have to leave your house to spouse and children.
Page 29 of 111
REVOCATION OR AMENDMENT OF WILLS/CODICILS
1. General Rule:
A. All wills and codicils are revocable and amendable provided that at the time testator goes
to change a will:
1. Testator is alive, AND
2. Testator is competent.
2. BURDEN OF PROOF
A. When a will is offered for probate, the burden is shifted to the proponent to show that the
will was revoked
3. PRESUMPTION
A. When there is a defaced or mutilated will, the presumption is that the testator’s intent was
to revoke or amend the will.
4. Three principle ways to amend or revoke a will:
A. Expressly or impliedly (by writing),
B. Physically destroy it (by act),
C. Effect of subsequent marriage, birth or dissolution of marriage.
5. §732.505 – Revocation by Writing
A. A will or codicil is revoked as a whole or in part by:
1. §732.505(1) Subsequent inconsistent will or codicil.
a. The revocation extends only so far as the inconsistency.
(1) example: Testator has will which sets up a trust for A&B. The testator
later signs a codicil setting up a trust for A&B&C.
(a) Court now says that there was no new provision that got rid of the
trust to A&B, so the Court enforced a trust to A&B&C.
2. §732.505(2) Subsequent written will, codicil or other writing declaring the
revocation.
a. Note: The subsequent writing must be executed with the same formalities as
are required when drafting a new will.
b. There must be substantial markings on will to show that you mean to revoke it,
so long as it was done with same formalities.
(1) Kronauge v Stoecklein
(a) She wrote “the will is void” on the margin
(b) Ct said if you want to revoke the entire will then you have to
deface the text of the will, she did not mark up the actual writing
so ct held will valid
i. This is an unsuccessful attempt to revoke a will by writing.
The cross-outs made would not affect the original writing
of the will, and the will will be viewed as if her “void” cross
outs aren’t there.
B. Revocation by Writing may also revoke wills implicitly
1. This is an effect of the inconsistency made by a codicil with the original
a. example: Testator writes a codicil adding another beneficiary. The implication
by adding another beneficiary is that he wishes to lessen the amounts to the
other beneficiaries.
Page 30 of 111
C. NOTE: Remember intent of testator to revoke entire will is by act, but in part could be as
follows:
1. Spoliation➾ Is a tort that makes it unlawful to write on someone else’s will.
6. §732.506 – Revocation by Act
A. A will or codicil is revoked in its entirety: (Florida holds the Minority View)
1. when the testator or some other person in the testator’s presence and at the
testator’s direction by burning, tearing, canceling, defacing, obliterating, or
destroying it with the intent, and for the purpose, of revocation.
a. Note: As long as other party has permission to destroy will, the testator doesn’t
have to watch them do it. Being in the same room is sufficient enough to make
this effective.
2. This requires intent and capacity on part of testator.
a. When there is whole or even partial destruction of a will and it was always in
testator’s hands, there is a presumption that the testator intended it to be
revoked
B. REMEMBER: Revocation by Act can only accomplish a complete revocation.
7. §732.507 – Effect of subsequent marriage, birth, or dissolution of marriage.
A. This may revoke part or all of a will by operation of law.
B. §732.507(2) Any provisions of a will executed by a married person, which provision
effects the spouse of that person, shall become void upon the divorce of that person or
upon the dissolution or annulment of the marriage.
1. The other parts of the will not be revoked and remain in full force and effect.
a. NOTE: Gifts to ex-spouses relatives aren’t effected by divorce.
b. NOTE: Subsequent marriages to the same spouse you previously divorced
does NOT reinstate the previous will.
8. §732.508 – Revival by Revocation
A. Where the testator leaves two documents purporting to be his will, the most recent one
would be held to be his will.
1. However, you must check the 2nd document to see if it’s a superseding will or just
a codicil.
B. Florida is an anti-revival state – you cannot revive a will
C. §732.508(1) Once a former will is revoked by the testator, it cannot be revived.
1. this is true even if the former will is in existence at the date of the revocation of the
subsequent will.
2. example: Once you have revoked a will by act of destruction, and realize that you
made a mistake, you may not tape it back together again. You must either:
a. Draft a new will, OR;
b. Write codicil that you liked your old will (republish it)
(1) §732.5105 – Republication of Wills By Codicil
(a) execution of a codicil referring to a previous will has the effect of
republishing or reconfirming the revoked will except as modified
by the amendments made in the codicil (if any)
i. EXCEPTION: unless there is a provision in the codicil
saying that it revokes the will
§732.511 Republication of Wills by Reexecution
If a will has been revoked or if it is invalid, it may e republished and made valid by
its rexecution or the execution of a codicil republishing it with the formalities required by
law for the execution of wills.
Page 31 of 111
§732.508(2) Revocation of a codicil to a will only revokes the codicils, not the underlying
D.
will
1. It is presumed that in revoking the codicil, the testator intended to reinstate the
provisions of the will or codicil that were changed or revoked by that codicil as if
the revoked codicil had never been executed
a. NOTE: however if you tear up a valid will but, not the codicils, the revoking of
the will automatically revokes all of the codicils.
9. Application
A. No matter which one of the above is used, the Testator’s Intent must always be focused
on.
B. Capacity is also relevant:
1. Look at the four requirements of Testamentary Capacity, only this time, the
testator must know that he is changing his will.
2. Look towards the four-corners of the document to determine capacity and intent, if
ambiguous then look towards extrinsic evidence.
a. Example: Even when physical destruction of a will occurs, the Courts need
substantial proof of intent not to destroy will because evidence of someone
tearing up a will is pretty conclusive that they didn’t want that will.
(1) When there is partial destruction of a will and it was always in testator’s
hands, there is a presumption that the testator intended it to be revoked
C. When a will is known to be in the testator’s possession and control, and then it can not be
found after death it is presumed to be revoked (this presumption can be rebutted).
1. If the original is gone, even if attorney has a copy, the will is considered gone.
2. This applies to codicils too.
a. However, in order to overcome this presumption states that you must:
(1) Prove the will existed; AND
(2) Prove what it said, or who was the executor.
(a) This is a high standard because you must find witnesses to the
will.
10. §733.207 – Establishment and Probate of Lost or Destroyed Will

A. If you can’t find a copy of the will, two disinterested (not having a money interest in the
will) witnesses are needed to testify.
1. This necessarily doesn’t mean the two witnesses that signed the will
B. If you can find a copy, then only one disinterested witness must testify.
1. a photocopy, carbon copy is sufficient but, not a rough draft.
2. When a will is missing but a codicil is found along with a photocopy of the will, the
Court will overcome the presumption and hold the will valid.
11. Doctrine of Dependant Relative Revocation [DRR]: (where does this go in)
Where a testator makes a new will revoking a valid prior will and the new will is
found to be invalid, the prior will may be reestablished on the ground that the
revocation of the prior will was dependent on the validity of the new will and the
testator would have preferred the earlier will to intestacy.
A. This is not a rule of law, it is an equitable remedy. It is a presumption concerning the
intent of the testator
B. It is a rebuttable presumption
st nd
C. May be applied to 1 or 2 will
Page 32 of 111
D. In Florida, you cannot revive a will that has been fully revoked. If a will is only
conditionally revoked, you can use DRR in Florida to get the will probated. However, it is
not considered fully revoked in that case, or you could not bring it back; it is only a
conditional revocation.s
E. This is generally applied when second wills are made by mistake:
1. A 1st will is executed then lost
2. A 2nd will was executed then after the 1st was found, destroyed or revoked the 2nd
st
a. Could alos come up where revokes 1 when there is a mistaken belief that his
property will be distributed in another way
(1) This is a but for his mistake argument
3. In effect, now the testator died intestate
4. In order to revoke a will, there must be a joint venture of action and intent
5. The beneficiaries or attorney can try to revive the 1st or 2nd under DRR saying he
didn’t intent to revoke the will since he would not have wanted to die intestate.
a. Where a testator makes a new will revoking prior will, and the new will is found
invalid, the prior will may be reestablished on the ground that revocation was
dependant (or relative) upon the validity of the new will and the testator would
have preferred the old will to intestacy.
b. If a will was destroyed, §733.207 permits extrinsic evidence to determine what
was intended.
6. If they succeed, DRR will only bring back a revived will in its entirety
F. How DRR works:
1. The last will executed prior to testator’s revoked will is revived
a. Only where the threshold is established that:
(1) Testator did not intend to die intestate
(a) If testimony/evidence exists that testator wanted to die with a will
(2) Testator would prefer prior will than die intestate
G. How to apply DRR:
1. Show testator only revoked the prior will under the supposition that the new will is
valid
a. To revoke a will, there must be a joint intention and action to revoke
(1) Must have had full intent to revoke 1st will
(2) Intention must not be conditional
2. Show that the two wills were not materially different
H. REMEMBER: Under §732.509 revocation of a will revokes all codicils, but the reverse is
not true under §732.508(2)
12. §732.512 Incorporation Of A Writing By Reference
A. §732.512(1) A writing in existence when a will is executed may be incorporated by
reference if the language of the will manifests this intent and describes the writing
sufficiently to permit its identification
1. document must already be in existence at time will is executed
2. must identify the document sufficiently so testator realizes you are incorporating it
into the will
a. What may sufficiently identify it is: (description of the document, the doc’s
date)
3. Must show testator intended to incorporate it
Page 33 of 111
B. §732.512(2) ( Acts of Independent Legal Significance ) A will may dispose of property by

reference to acts and events which have significance apart for their effect upon the
dispositions made by the will
1. It doesn’t matter whether these acts occur before or after:
a. the execution of the will, or
b. the testator’s death
2. Must be acts of independent legal significance
a. An example of such an act or event is the execution or revocation of a will or
trust by another person
b. Example: Who ever I marry will receive trust of $10,000
13. §732.515 Separate writing identifying devises of tangible property
A. Allows tangible personal property(not cash or business property) to be disposed of
through a separate writing
1. writing doesn’t have to be in existence before will is executed
B. Writing must:
1. be signed by testator
2. sufficiently describe tangible property
3. sufficiently describe who gets it (specify)
C. Does not include money, property used in trade or business, or stocks
14. Codicils
A. Codicils are a partial revocation by writing, and must be carefully drafted or else
confusion will arise.
B. Example:
1. Will Says: Article 6, ¶ B says, “I leave $1,000.00 to my brother Bob.”
2. Codicil Says: “Testator hereby revokes Article 6, ¶ B and in its place inserts the
following ‘I leave $1,000.00 to my niece Nancy.’”
3. ✓The above is an example of a correctly drafted codicil.
C. Example:
1. Will Says: Article 6, ¶ B says “I leave $1,000.00 to my brother Bob.”
2. Codicil Says: “On my death, I leave $500.00 to my brother Bob and $1,500 to my
niece Nancy.”
3. ✓The above is an example of an incorrect way to draft a will because Courts don’t
know if this is “in addition to” or “in place of” the previous provision in the will.
D. Generally, gifts in Codicils are presumed to be “in addition to” the will and not in conflict
with wills.
Page 34 of 111
PRETERMITTED SPOUSE
1. A spouse is pretermitted when the decedent failed to execute a new will after marrying, thus
leaving the surviving spouse without mention in the decedent’s will.
A. Under §732.301, a pretermitted spouse has the same rights they would have received
had the decedent died intestate.
1. surviving spouse receives her intestacy share first, and then the remainder of
decedent’s will is enforced.
a. example: Sean executes a will. Soon thereafter Sean marries Catherine, and
never gets around to change his will. Sean dies and his will doesn’t provide for
his wife. Catherine is considered a pretermitted spouse under §732.301.
2. Public Policy: Court feels that spouse, had they had the chance, would have
provided for their spouse.
B. Burden of proof is on surviving spouse to:
1. Prove that they were pretermitted (married after execution of will)
2. Prove that they were married at the time of death(i.e. valid marriage); AND
a. Note: marriage can be for 1 minute or 15 years – it doesn’t matter.
C. Three Exceptions to the general rule of §732.301
1. §732.301(1) Waiver of Rights:
a. Existence of a prenuptial or anti-nuptual agreement, will prevent pretermitted
spouse from exercising her rights to pretermitted share
(1) This can be signed either before or after the marriage, and simply may
state, “I wave all rights” to be sufficient. It is not necessary that you use
the word pretermitted.
2. §732.301(2) The Spouse is provided for in the will:
a. If a person is “provided for” in will then they are not considered a pretermitted
spouse in Florida
b. To determine what it means to be “provided” for:
(1) Look to whether testator left to that person in contemplation of marriage
as a spouse.
(a) To determine “in contemplation of marriage” court looks at
extrinsic evidence
i. Evidence they are only an acquaintance, friend, or
business associate is disproving contemplation of
marriage.
ii. Example: Jack was friends with Jill, he made a will
providing for his friend Jill, and later in life ended up
marrying Jill. Before he died, he never changed his will to
reflect his new wife. Courts look towards extrinsic
evidence to see if the two were contemplating marriage at
the time the will was drafted.
c. In Re Estate of Spencer
(1) Left her as a beneficiary under a retirement plan as her married name,
but they were not married yet.
(2) In Hawaii, marriage revokes a will in Hawaii if no provision has been
made stating otherwise.
Page 35 of 111
(3) Ct looked to whether the will provided for the new wife as a spouse?
Looked at four corners of the document.
(4) At the time he drafted the will, was he contemplating marriage? They
said no, so only treated her as a friend even though they were engaged
to be married. [DOES IT MATTER IF THEY WERE ENGAGED TO BE
MARRIED AT TIME OF WILL] In Florida, because he did not provide for
her as spouse, the exception wouldn’t apply. Thus, she would have
been found to be pretermitted.
d. Basically, if you show that the gift in the will, at the time the will is drafted, was
provided for this person as a spouse, in contemplation of marriage. Then this
person would thus not be considered a pretermitted spouse and would not
have right to distribution had the decedent died intestate.
3. §732.301(3) Will discloses an intention not to provided for spouse:
a. Presumption is that if you write nothing in your will about your wife, that you
just forgot.
b. All will has to say is the fact that you know that you have a wife, but that you
make no provision in your will for her.
D. Computation of Pretermitted Spouse share:
1. example: Testator had two children by a previous marriage and spouse was not
provided for in the will. Testator had an estate of $100,000.00, a remainder of a
car loan for $12,000.00 and funeral bills of $8,000.00.
(1) ??? HOW DO WE TREAT THIS ???
2. §732.302 Pretermittive Children
A. When a child is born/adopted after execution of a will and the will was never changed in
include the child, and the child did not receive his share, then the child is considered
pretermitive.
B. A pretermitive child shall receive a share of the estate equal in value to that he would
have received if the testator died intestate (unless you meet an exception)
1. Two exceptions to the general rule
a. If it appears from the will that the child was omitted intentionally; OR
(1) If any intentional reference to include the child was made after the will
was executed, then the child receives nothing
b. The testator had one or more kids when the will was executed and devised
substantially all the estate to the other parent of the pretermitted child
C. Parent has the right to disinherit a child but must do so consciously
Page 36 of 111
RIGHT TO ELECTIVE SHARE
1. The difference between an Elective Share and a Pretermitted Spouse is the fact that a
Pretermitted Spouse was not provided for at all – and was not referred to in the will in
the capacity of a spouse. To claim an elective share you simply have to be a spouse
that doesn’t like what you were left.
A. A spouse of decedent that is not happy with what the decedent left her in the will:
1. Has a right to elective share (which replaces dower and courtesy)
2. Elective share applies equally to husbands and wives
3. No longer common law, it is statute based
2. Rights of Surviving Spouse
A. Rights to gifts under the will
B. Rights to Homestead (statutory or constitutional)
C. Rights to Exempt property (statutory or constitutional)
D. Family allowance
E. If pretermitted spouse, right to share
3. “Elective share” – an amount that becomes payable to a surviving spouse in cash or in kind
(non-cash assets) under certain circumstances (Applies in Testate Estates)
1. It is computed as a percentage of the Fair Market Value of Probate assets that are
subject to administration
a. But only gets the assets after deduction of valid claims against the estate,
mortgages, liens, or security interests on those assets
4. §732.201 – Right to Elective Share of Spouse
A. The surviving spouse of a decedent shall have the right to demand a share of the estate
of the deceased spouse, only if the decedent was a Florida domiciliary
1. The decedent must be domiciled in Florida but, the spouse can live somewhere
else.
B. Decedent must have died intestate
1. Elective share only applies in testate estates [DOES ELECTIVE SHARE APPLY
IN TESTATE OR INTESTATE ESTATES???]
C. Generally, the elective share of a spouse has priority over any other gift in the will.
5. Procedure
A. Courts will use the Elective share statutes that were in effect at the time of the
testator’s death, and not the statute in effect when the petition was filed.
6. §732.205 Elective Share Restricted to FL Resident Decedent

A. GET THE INFO FROM THE HANDOUT
7. §732.2025 Definitions - lists the definitions used in this section
8. §732.2105 Effect of Election on Other Interests (formerly §732.211)
A. 732.2105(1) The right to petition for elective share shall be” in addition to” other rights of
a surviving spouse (formerly §732.208)
B. 732.2105(2) Decedent will be treated as though he was predeceased by surviving
spouse
1. Has the effect of saying that:
a. Spouse gets paid first; and
b. when other beneficiaries are paid, they will be paid according to the will
Page 37 of 111
9. §732.2125 Right of Election; by whom exercisable [STANDING] (Formerly §732.210)

A. SEE HANDOUT FOR ADDITIONAL INFO
B. Purpose: to preserve a surviving spouse’s well being, not to make them rich.
C. Who has standing to bring the elective share request?
1. Surviving spouse may bring election;
a. The Court however has discretion to block the elective share of a surviving
spouse.
(1) Example: Court may consider if this was a fourth marriage and was for
only one week.
(2) Example: Wrongful conduct may also block the share.
2. Personal representative may bring election
a. If it is an incompetant surviving spouse, this individuals actions must be
approved by the Courts as being in the “best interest” of the surviving spouse.
(1) In determining “best interest” the court will look at:
(a) Whether an incompetent surviving spouse has independent
wealth in which to live on;
(b) Whether when that person was competent they knew what the
the deceased spouse’s will said and they accepted it
(2) Court will not enforce the elective share petition of the personal
representative where these are found.
(3) Clarkson v 1st National Bank
(a) Court looked to see if it was in the best interest of the
incompetant surviving spouse to get an elective share. She was
left ¼ of his estate. She was left power of appointment but she
became incompetant. Ct didn’t want to look only at the money.
Ct tries to step into the surviving spouses shoes and decide, if
they were competent would they have taken the elective share for
their well being.
3. Holder of a Durable Power of Attorney may bring election.
a. Holder may elect to take the elective share on behalf of a surviving spouse
against the will of a surviving spouse.
b. Refer to “Documents Relating to Wills” infra for more on Durable Power of
Attorney
10. §732.2135 Time of Election (formerly §732.212)
A. Petition for Elective Share must be made within 4 months from the date of the first
publication of notice of administration.
1. Publication in newspaper that you will be probating a will satisfies notice of
administration.
B. EXCEPTIONS:
1. Some Other Proceeding: If there is some other proceeding going on in regards to
the Testator’s will, then the surviving spouse may get an extension to file of 40
days after the finalization of the previous proceedings.
a. The above litigation can not start after the 4 month period is over in order for
you to claim extension.
(1) This extension applies even if the surviving spouse is part of the
litigation.
2. Fraud: If the surviving spouse was somehow defrauded into not filing for the
elective share, the proceeding may be opened up again.
Page 38 of 111
3. Surviving Spouse Dies Before Filing: Elective Share request can not be made if
the surviving spouse dies prior to filing the petition.
a. If the election is made timely but, the surviving spouse dies prior to getting the
money, the Court will award the money to the surviving spouse’s estate.
11. §732.2035 Property Entering into Computation of Elective Share (formerly §732.206)
A. §732.2035(1) Does not include things that pass outside of probate; Only includes probate
assets
B. §732.2035(2) Does include “decedent’s ownership interest” in accounts registered as
“Pay on Death” or “Transfer on Death” or “In trust for”
1. “decedent’s ownership interest” means that portion of the accounts which the
decedent had immediately before death, the right to revoke (i.e. revocable trusts)
C. Does include homestead, family allowance, property in joint tenancy, joint accounts, etc.
1. DOES THIS INCLUDE real property not located in Florida.
D. Sullivan v Burkin
1. Wanted to cut out his separated wife or child. She is not a pretermitted spouse
because they were married at the time of execution. She wants her elective
share.
2. Problem is that most of his assets are in a trust, and generally trusts pass outside
of probate.
3. Ct held this trust was illusory but still valid; it is a revocable trust disguised as an
irrevocable trust. Since revocable trusts will be considered part of the probate
estate, they included it.
E. Traub v Klatkiss
1. Surviving spouse was separated from deceased husband. Most of his assets
have been transferred so that she couldn’t get anything. She said it was
fraudulent. Ct didn’t agree. The legislature didn’t intend to include non-probate
assets in the computation of the elective share. This was not an illusory transfer
as she claimed. Thus, she can’t receive anything under elective share, even
though the motivation was fraudulent. You only get an elective share on probate
assets. Old statute allowed election only on probabtable assets. New statute
differs in that it allows election even on some non-probatable assets which are
listed. [IS THIS A TRUE STATEMENT??] IS THIS STATEMENT INTENDED TO
INCLUDE REVOCABLE TRUSTS DISGUISED AS IRREVOCABLE]
F. Seifert v Burkin
1. Trusts he created for his two daughters were held as illusory because he never
really gave them away and they could not do anything with them without his
permission.
12. §732.2065 Amount of Elective Share (formerly §732.207)
A. 30% of the Fair Market Value of the Testator’s assets
1. Such valuation shall be made on the date of death (FMV).
2. 30% comes from §732.2075 (see infra):
13. §732.2075 HOW to pay the Elective Share (formerly §732.209)
A. Absent a provision in the Testator’s will on how to handle an anticipated elective share
judgment, the elective share shall be paid through the Court’s discretion as follows:
1. §732.2075(1) look at instructions in the will, they are controlling
2. Then go down list under §732.2075(1)(a-f)
a. §732.2075(1)(a) take proceeds from life insurance policy of decedent not
owned by surviving spouse
Page 39 of 111
b. §732.2075(1)(b) take proceeds from retirement plan of decedent

c. §732.2075(1)(c) take ½ of decedent’s real property
d. §732.2075(1)(d) take property held in special needs trust for surviving spouse
e. §732.2075(1)(e) take assets that he was going to give to the surviving spouse
in the will;
f. §732.2075(1)(f) take assets that would have gone to the surviving spouse in
the will but which he disclaimed (this doesn’t include revocable trusts)
3. §732.2075(3) Permits payment to be in cash or in kind property. (formerly
§732.214)
a. Assets in kind shall be distributed at fair market value on the date of
distribution. (example: stocks) However, other assets are valued at the time of
death.
4. §732.2075(4) To the extent that these are inadequate to satisfy the Court’s ruling,
use the order found in the Rules of Abatement under §733.805
a. First take property not disposed of by the will
b. If not enough or all is disposed, look for residuary clause
(1) Take property devised to the residuary devisee or devisees;
c. Then take from general devises: Property not specifically or demonstratively
devised;
d. Then take property specifically or demonstratively devised
B. From the above number, you must deduct:
1. All valid claims against the estate that can be payable by the estate, AND
a. Note: Such as any money owed to the surviving spouse.
2. All mortgages, liens, or security interests on the assets.
a. Note: Funeral Bills are deductible here.
C. What isn’t deducted is:
1. Administrative Costs (ie: those costs incurred in administering the will), including
taxes.
14. Notes➾
15. §732.2085(3) allows someone the option to get creative in order to not loose a gift from a
testator in order to satisfy an elective share.
A. Example: Ed receives an apartment building from his dead uncle Ted. Ted’s wife
however, was awarded an elective share and due to circumstances Ed was supposed to
give up his apartment building to her. Pursuant to this section, Ed may have the
apartment building appraised and pay Ted’s wife that amount of money thereby keeping
his building.
16. §732.215 If additional taxes are owed because of a surviving spouse deciding to elect their
share – the spouse must pay that bill!
17. Example of a difficulty in paying the Elective Share

A. Blockage Discount: Occurs when there has been a reduction in the price of stock which
occurs because stock that is to be sold is sold in larger than normal quantities.
1. Example: Grandfather dies. Grandfather is the majority shareholder of GM. His
wife gets an elective share, and now his stock must al be sold. Selling ALL that
stock at once floods the market and drastically devalues the price of the stock.
2. REMEMBER: case about the oil paintings ($200,000 vs. $15,000,000)
18. Elective Share recap:
Page 40 of 111
A. ELECTIVE SHARES SAY THAT THEY DON’T WANT WHAT WAS LEFT TO THEM IN
THE WILL – THEY WANT 30%. HOWEVER, THOSE WHO ELECT THIS, DON’T GET
THEIR SHARE IN ADDITION TO WHAT WAS LEFT TO THEM IN THE WILL BUT,
THEY DO GET THEIR ELECTIVE SHARE IN ADDITION TO THE RIGHTS OF A
SURVIVING SPOUSE UNDER FLORIDA LAW.
19. §732.702 Waiver of Spouse’s Rights to Elect
A. A surviving spouse is entitled to waive rights to such things as elective shares,
homestead, etc.
1. This can be done either before your spouse dies (ie: prenuptual agreement) or
after the spouse has died (ie: by failing to claim a right or by filing a disclaimer
pursuant to §732.801)
B. Ways to waive:
1. If its not timely, you waive your right under §732.2135 (6 mos)
2. Waiver must be made knowingly and intentionally;
a. Nuptial Agreement – look to see what the spouse waived, you must make a
determination if she waived rights to elective share
b. Written Settlement Agreement – Their willing to take so much in exchange for
their rights to election
3. The Slayer Statute – If you somehow cause the death of your spouse, you are not
permitted to elect your share
4. May be estopped from claiming an elective share;
a. Example: Two individuals are married, they never consummate their marriage
and also enter into many bigamous marriages throughout their time together.
Such a person would be estopped from claiming an elective share.
C. There are however some exceptions for self-defense, etc.
Page 41 of 111
Comparison of old to new statutes in elective share:

Old Statute New Statute
Right to Elective Share 732.01 & 732.05 732.201 (no big change)
In addition to other rights 732.208 732.2105 (1) (no change)
After election, treated as 732.211 732.2105 (2) (no change)
predeceased
Standing - Who may 732.210 - 2 people have a 732.2125 - Specifically now
exercise the right to an right - either 1) spouse or allows 3 people to have a
elective share 2) guardian of the spouse right - either 1) spouse 2)
Case law allows power of guardian of the spouse &
attorney also. 3) Power of attorney
Standard: Best Interest Standard: Best interest
determining the spouse’s
probable lifetime needs
Time of Election 732.212 - Must bring within 732.2135 - Extends time
4 months of the first amount to 6 months. You
publication of can petition the court for an
administration. extension. But then if you
withdraw you will receive
certain charges
Assets 732.206 - Only probate 732.2035 - No longer
assets subject to limited to just those things
administration to go into through probate subject to
computation of elective administration. Also
share included: Joint bank
accounts or trusts; tenancy
of the entireties. Still goes
automatically to survivor,
but they go into amount
computed for elective
share.
Revocable trusts and
certain rights to income,
other transfers the
decedent made where
other persons were to
distribute to the decedent,
net value of life insurance
policies, benefits paid to
another person on
decedents retirement plan.
These are allowed in
computation under new
statute.
Listed in 732.2045 - Can’t
have overlapping.
Page 42 of 111
Amount of the Share 732.207 - Spouse gets 732.2065 - still 30%; but
30% becomes more because
there are so many more
assets allowed in the
computation
Payment - From what 732.209 - 1) Look to will for 732.2075 - Same - But, on
assets are they payable?? direction 2) then take top it gives you a list of
assets to surviving spouse what else you pay from;
3) Go to abatement to take above list.
assets. 732.2085 - Liability of direst
recipients and
beneficiaries. Who and in
what percentage.
732.2095 - Valuation of the
assets from which they are
being paid. As of what time
period do you value those
assets.
Spouse can be paid in 732.214 - Permits you to 732.2075(3) - Also permits
Cash or in Kind pay in cash or property. you to pay in cash or
property.
Spouse gets paid 1st 732.211 732.2105(2) -
Page 43 of 111
PROTECTIONS GIVEN TO SPOUSE AND FAMILY
1. §732.402 - Exempt Property

A. Designed to primarily protect those estates that are of little value because, without these
exemptions, the estate would be worthless.
B. Applies whether testate or intestate.
C. Protections provided by both statute and constitution.
D. §732.402(1) Basically, the surviving spouse or the children of the decedent shall have a
share in the estate designated as “exempt property”
E. §732.402(2) Such property consists of:
1. Household furniture, furnishings, and appliances in the decedent’s usual place of
abode up to a net value of $10,000 as of the date of death;
a. Note: In addition, the Florida Constitution exempts $1,000 as well – so in
actuality – you can exempt $11,000.
2. All automobiles held in the decedent’s name and regularly used by the decedent
or members of the decedent’s family as their personal automobiles, etc.
a. Example: If you know you are about to die, go out and buy a Rolls Royce and
put it in your name, this way your creditors cannot touch it, and your family can
keep the value.
F. §732.402(4) states that these exemptions are in addition to what was left in a will, or
inherited through intestate, etc.
G. §732.402(5) states that property demonstratively devised by the decedent’s will to any
devisee shall not be included in exempt property.
1. means creditors won’t get it if willed away
H. Creditors that COULD seize these assets:
1. The Federal Government could if the decedent owes back taxes.
a. The Federal Government isn’t bound by the Florida Constitution.
(1) However, it is unlikely that the Government would come in and take
these things.
2. Creditors with security interests in such property.
a. Example: Assume Dead Dan bought a refrigerator on time, and at the time of
his death he had not yet finished paying off the item. At this time, Sears could
come in and take the refrigerator.
(1) It is likely that these creditors come in to take these items.
b. NOTE: Funeral bills are technically not creditors claims since their expense
was incurred after death.
I. Waiver
1. Failure to Act: Since, you must petition the Court with what is exempted property
pursuant to §732.402(6) within 4 months after the date of first publication or 40
days after the date of the last proceeding involving this will, failure to do so could
result in a waiver of this right.
a. Example: Failure to tally up the $11,000 worth of household goods would result
in a waiver.
(1) Petitioner must describe the asset and estimate it’s value.
2. Decedent waiving rights for you: The decedent may do this in two ways:
a. By leaving all tangible personal property in his home to his brother.
Page 44 of 111
(1) Since his brother is not allowed such an exception under the statute, the
decedent has in actuality waived the rights for his spouse and children.
b. By mortgaging all of his property.
(1) Nothing could be exempted since it is subject to creditor’s security.
(a) Example: The bank, Cadillac, Sears, etc.
2. §732.403 - Family Allowance

A. When the decedent’s surviving spouse and his lineal heirs needs money as soon as
possible and can not wait until after the probate proceeding, the Court may grant them an
allowance.
B. Occurs in either Testate or Intestate estates regardless what the will states.
C. Requirements:
1. The decedent had to be domiciled in Florida;
2. The decedent was either obligated to or was supporting his surviving spouse or
any lineal heirs.
a. This may also include lineal decendents or ascendents (ie: what if the
decedent was supporting his parents!)
b. Note: Being a personal representative does not block the person from getting
an allowance.
D. Procedure:
1. Individual must file a petition with the Court however, there is really no set time
limit in which to file.
a. However, this provision is designed to help emergencies therefore, filing
usually happens within 1 month of the death of decedent.
(1) Example: Widow waited 6 months to file this petition and the Court
rejected it. Evidence of procrastination shows that person maybe
doesn’t really need the money.
2. The maximum a Court will award is $6,000 after it determines whether or not the
petitioner needs the money at all.
3. The Court will also determine how the money will be paid.
a. Example: lump sums or installments.
b. Note: The family allowance has priority over claims of creditors;
c. Note: Whomever the allowance is being paid to – should that person die, the
payments will cease.
E. Waiver:
1. Failure to file;
2. If you die the benefits stop; it is to momentarily benefit you
3. Nuptual agreements;
4. Settlement agreements, etc.
3. §733.806 - Advancement
A. An advancement is a gift made by decedent during life to a family member that
B. When a decedent dies Intestate but during the decedent’s life he made a transfer to
someone (usually parent to child or presumptive heir) with out consideration (like a gift),
we treat this property as an inheritance (and not a gift or a loan)
Page 45 of 111
1. the reason this even matters is because what was transferred was actually part of
what the heir/child would have gotten during intestate, public policy requires
everything to be fair by equalizing everyone’s share
a. so rather than give them more shit than they are entitled to through the
intestacy statutes, they get less as decedents estate is distributed. (but
technically they get the same).
C. To be an advancement: (2 ways: 1,2,AND 3 OR 4)
1. must show intent AND
a. it was intended to be deducted from heirs share of the estate when decedent
died
(1) example: Son tells father that he wants to go to law school, so his
father gives him several thousand dollars. Policy states that it was the
father’s intention that this money that he gave him during his lifetime
was actually an advancement to what the father intended the son to
receive on death.
(2) This differentiates an advancement from a gift or a loan
(3) Not all gifts constitute an advancement.
(a) Example: Birthday/Graduation gifts aren’t advancements because
not intended to be deducted
2. must be a contemporaneous writing by the decedent AND
3. must be signed at time of transfer OR
a. Either Decedent or Heir can sign.
b. An heir can even sign after the decedent’s death.
4. If person receiving the money acknowledges in a contemporaneous writing that its
an early distribution of inheritance, this is all the court needs to consider it an
advancement
D. REMEMBER – this concept of Advancement has no application when the testator dies
TESTATE.
E. Procedure:
1. Step One: Court must determine whether or not there was an advancement.
2. Step Two: If the Court finds there was an advancement, they must next determine
how much it was for.
3. Step Three: Court uses the theory of “HOTCHPOT”
a. Hotchpot➾ Court will bring back, into the estate (numerically, not physically)
the advancement in order to determine how much each other heir should get.
b. Example: Assume father advanced to daughter $60,000 during his lifetime. At
death, he dies intestate, and the Court “brings back” the $60,000 advancement
into his intestate estate.
(1) At intestate his estate is worth $190,000. We bring “back” the $60,000,
and now the intestate estate is worth $250,000.
(2) Next we see that testator had no surviving spouse and five children. SO
we divide the estate (pursuant to Florida Law – per stirpes) among the
five children – giving each child $50,000 each.
(3) However, the daughter already got $60,000 – so unless she gives
10,000 back to the estate – the Court can only divide $190,000 by four
children.
Page 46 of 111
4. Step Four: That daughter should give back the 10,000 to the estate. However, if
she does not, the only remedy available is that she will be deprived from anything
future assets out of this estate. (Big Deal)
5. NOTE: if daughter dies before she receives advancement (though all 1,2,and 3 are
met), children are not effected and each will receive share as if no advancement
Page 47 of 111
HOMESTEAD
1. Purpose of the Homestead probate exemption is to promote stability. It prevents creditors

from forcing the sale of decedent’s family homes.
A. Not concerned with what can happen during decedent’s lifetime
2. Homestead property is not probate property
A. Doesn’t pass under the will, passes as if its not part of the will goes to the person entitled
under the Constitution and statutes.
B. Statutes do not state what Homestead is, neither does the Florida Constitution, but it
does give an outline in Article X, Section 4 (a-c)of the Florida Constitution.
3. ORDER ON TEST:
A. In order to be exempt from a forced sale under §4 of the constitution
st
B. 1 - must show under §4(a)
1. that it’s real property, AND
a. exemption applies to:
(1) land - ie: to dirt
(a) you can be homestead exempt for an empty piece of land
(2) any improvement on the land- ie: a house, garage or improvements
(a) as long as those improvements, etc. are used by owner and his
family.
(b) A trailer or mobile home on property would be part of homestead.
(c) Rental property is not homestead.
2. that it’s owned by a natural person (not corporations)
nd
C. 2 – Must be within size limits of §4(a)(1)
1. If located outside a municipality, 160 acres of contiguous land is homestead
a. If land subsequently becomes part of a municipality the 160 acres may not be
reduced as Homestead without the owner’s consent.
b. Example: Contiguous means in succession.
(1) There are three parcels of land numbered one through three next to
each other. Harriet Homeowner owns parcels 1 and 3. She may not
claim parcels 1 and 3 as Homestead together because they aren’t
contiguous.
2. If located within a municipality, ½ acre is homestead but exemption limited to
owner or owners family
th
D. 4 – must be decedents primary residence
1. principal place of residence or intent to remain there qualifies
a. decedent resided there at time of death
b. If decedednt wasn’t residing there but family was
c. If owned 2 homes, look at: drivers licence, where he votes, where he files
income taxes
th
E. 5 – must determine if after the decedent’s death, the exemption inures to anyone(if
anyone can benefit from it) or if the home is subject to the claims of decedent’s creditors
1. Under §4(b), these exemptions shall inure to the surviving spouse or heirs
(§732.103 discusses heirs) of the owner
a. This § allows the exemption to continue even though it’s no longer decedent’s
homestead (because he’s dead)
Page 48 of 111
2. §4(c) restricts lifetime alienation (what you can do with it while your still alive) and
limits the devises
a. §732.4015 statutorily reiterates limits on devises as provided by the
constitution
(1) General Rule➾ If the decedent dies with a spouse and no children , he
or she may not devise Homestead property to anyone else but the
spouse. (statute says “may”?)
(2) General Rule➾ If the decedent dies with a spouse and lineal
descendents then the surviving spouse has a Life Estate and the
children have a vested remainder.
(3) General Rule➾ If the decedent dies with only minor children he similarly
may not devise Homestead property to anyone else.
(4) General Rule➾ If the decedent dies without a spouse and adult children
he has no restriction on who to devise Homestead property to.
(a) Example➾ Assuming that the decedent has no surviving spouse
and only adult children, he can preserve Homestead by leaving it
to a grandchild because that grandchild is a lineal descendent of
his. However, since under these facts the decedent could leave it
to anyone – if he chooses not to give it to a lineal descendent but
to his friend Fred, he has destroyed Homestead.
(5) General Rule➾ If the decedent dies with no children or spouse, he or
she has no restriction on who to leave Homestead property to.
3. If the devise under the constitution was ineffective (maybe because died intestate),
then homestead shall descend under §732.401(1) in the same manner as other
intestate property UNLESS decedent is survived by a spouse and lineal
descendants, the S gets a life estate and LDs get a vested remainder
F. EXCEPTIONS
1. Homestead shall be subject to forced sale to pay taxes (federal, state, local) §4(a)
2. Homestead exempt from all other creditors except:
a. Obligations contracted to purchase, repair, or improve the homestead (i.e.
mortgage)
b. Obligations purchased to develop the homestead (roofers, contractors)
c. If someone’s lien attaches before Homestead, then that creditor can come after
your home.
(1) example: Assume you charge a vacation on Visa and default on
payments. Soon after, you get Homestead exception. Because the lien
from the Visa charge occurred before the Homestead, Visa can come
after your home for payment.
3. If decedent properly alienated property during his lifetime
a. §4(c) says proper alienation by mortgage, sale or gift, if married by deed, and
abandonment
b. If improper, survivors can try to get it back
4. One may not avoid the restrictions imposed on Homestead by transferring
Homestead property to a trust - §732.4015(2)
4. Examples of Homestead:
A. Commercial Property is not Homestead;
1. If part of property is occasionally used for business or office purposes the Court
will not deny Homestead.
Page 49 of 111
a. Office room or rented room in house.

2. Must be permanent residence of the decedent:
a. regular home;
b. condominium;
c. townhouse; but
d. not a co-op because it isn’t real property.
3. Any vested estate may qualify for Homestead (ie: A Life Estate can qualify as
Homestead)
4. Even property that was Homestead and was transferred in a trust, it still qualifies
as Homestead.
a. Courts look at the intent of the person – ie: If they rent their house while they
are gone for a year, as long as their intent is to return that is okay.
b. Even if person goes to jail for 10 years and if your intent is to go back to that
house you have not abandoned Homestead.
5. Remember – Decedent must own the real estate to qualify for a homestead
exemption.
a. If the required period of adverse possession has been satisfied then the person
can acquire this property and use it for Homestead.
(1) Standard to prove adverse possession is by clear and convincing
evidence.
b. §732.401(2) property held as Tenants by the Entirety is not considered
Homestead.
(1) Property owned with Rights of Survivorship is not considered
Homestead because it is not subject to probate.
5. Waivers and Termination of Homestead - Abandonment
A. Abandonment constitutes a waiver of Homestead and can be defined as: vacated or
waived intending never to return.
1. Death does not equal an abandonment.
B. Being ousted from a home is not the voluntary relinquishment of a right and therefore not
an abandonment.
1. note: If the decedent was ousted from a house pursuant to divorce, and not
because of his own making, it is not an abandonment of Homestead.
C. Eminent Domain taking: no voluntary relinquishment, it was taken away from you
involuntarily.
D. If the decedent requests in is will that his home be sold then this is a waiver of
Homestead…..can he do this ?
1. Example➾ Assume that on January 30, 1999 you contracted to sell your home to
Fred but, prior to the closing you die. However, the sale of a home abandons
Homestead. However, if the proceeds of the sale are reinvested into another
home within a reasonable period of time then, the new home retains Homestead
status.
2. Courts look at the intent and say that the decedent intended to sell the home.
6. What can you do with Homestead:
A. Rule: A married person who is the owner of Homestead property, even if he is the sole
owner, he must have the spouse sign the deed to sell the property.
1. The wife must sign the deed.
Page 50 of 111
a. example #1➾ Dave and Wendy are married. However Dave owns Homestead
property with Bob as Tenants in Common. Dave then decides to convey his
interest to Charlie, and transfers the deed without Wendy signing it.
(1) The transfer from Dave to Charlie was invalid because Dave’s spouse
did not sign the deed to a transfer of Homestead property.
b. EXCEPTION: If Dave decided to transfer the property to his spouse Wendy, he
does not need her signature.
(1) If no spouse but minor children – the children might need a guardian to
sign.
c. example #2➾ Decedent owned 360 acres of land outside of the municipality
and his principal residence was located on this property. He later took 200
acres and sold it to someone else without having his wife sign the deed.
(1) Homestead said that even if the land is solely owned (and even
purchased prior to marriage), the decedent must have his wife sign the
deed if the land sold was Homestead.
(2) Remember: The fact that a home is Homestead exempt is not
conclusive proof that the property is probate property and subject to
Homestead restrictions.
d. example #3➾ Commercial property is not Homestead. For your property to be
Homestead it has to be your principal place of residence. Assume Farmer Ted
owned 100 acres outside the city. Ted rented 99.75% of the land to Farmer
Fred and made profits off this. Ted had his home on the remaining quarter
acre. For Homestead purposes, only the quarter acre that his home sat on
would be considered Homestead since the other land was used commercially.
e. example #4➾ Assume the same facts as above. We need to look at all the
facts and circumstances in order to ascertain which parts of the property are
probate property. Items such as pools, garages are all part of Homestead and
should thus be included in the acreage when determining Homestead.
f. example #5➾ Son took property as a beneficiary instead of an heir because it
was testate. Credit card company says because he is a beneficiary they can
collect. Ct will say no because he’s still a person who otherwise would have
been an heir.
In class example:
1. Can Saks force a sale of H's home during his lifetime to collect his debt?
a. H is a widower, no children, and is the sole owner of the home.
Answer: No, it is his homestead
2. Can H alienate his house, given same facts as above? Yes, he is a single man.
a. What if H remarries? No, then he must have his wife's permission to alienate
the homestead.
3. What happens to the house if H dies intestate, given the same facts as #1? It will
descend in the same manner as other intestate property.
a. What if H is married? It goes to his wife (F.S. 732.102)
b. What if H is married with one adult child? Same as #4(a).
c. If his wife is deceased, and he has one minor child? Goes to his child (F.S.
732.401, 732.103).
4. Can H freely devise his home? It can be devised to spouse, provided there are no
minor children.
Page 51 of 111
a. Assume H has one minor child, plus a spouse? No, the spouse take a life
estate in the homestead, with a vested remainder to the lineal descendants in
being at the time of the decedent's death.
c. Assume H is married and has one adult child? Same as #4(a).
d. Assume wife is deceased, and on minor child? Cannot devise home, via
Florida Constitution and F.S. 732.4015.
e. Assume wife is deceased, and he is survived by one adult child? He can freely
devise in that instance.
• A tenancy by the entirety is not homestead for the purposes of descent. However,
it is still homestead exempt from the claims of creditors.
• A spouse is not liable for the debts of his/her spouse.
More In-class examples (from questions above):

1. Wife has a child, and marries Husband #2, who is divorced with a minor child.
a. Can W freely devise the homestead? No, because she has a minor child.
b. What happens if she dies intestate? Life estate to spouse and vested
remainder to her lineal descendant.
2. Same facts as above, except W & H2 own homestead with TBE, then W dies.
a. H2 would then own the homestead, due to the TBE.
b. When H2 passes intestate, his minor child would get the homestead, as
opposed to hers.
WILL CONTESTS
1. Will Contests take two forms:

A. If not yet probated
1. may object to the petition for administration
B. If already admitted to probate
1. may petition to revoke the will
2. may make a qualified renunciation
a. if you lose, you still remain a beneficiary
2. §733.212 – Notice of Administration; Filing Objections and Contest Claims
A. §733.212(1) permits all interested persons to challenge the validity of a will
1. §731.201(21) defines “interested person” as anyone who may reasonably be
expected to be affected by the outcome of the proceeding
a. TEST: You are considered to be affected by the outcome if you stand to gain
pecuniary or other interest by contesting the will
b. The language of §731.201(21) deems a personal representative as an
interested party in any proceeding affecting the estate or the rights of a
beneficiary in the estate
(1) HOWEVER, A personal representative is not granted automatic
standing to contest
(a) They must resign if they wish to contest the will
Page 52 of 111
c. Term does NOT include an heir at law or devisee who has received his
distribution.
3. §733.107 - Burden of Proof in Contests
A. In all proceedings contesting the validity of a will:
1. Burden shall be upon the proponent of the will to establish prima facie its formal
execution and attestation (witnessing the signing).
2. Thereafter, the contestant shall have the burden of establishing the grounds.
4. Grounds For Will Contest in Florida: See below
A. Fraud
B. Mistake
C. Undue Influence
D. Lack of Testamentary Capacity
5. Presumption/ Standing to Contest

A. Court begins analysis of a will with the presumption that: If an adult signs a will, they have
the requisite capacity.
1. That presumption may be rebutted by anyone who;
a. raises such issue of lack of capacity, AND
b. has standing to do so.
2. Such a person also has the burden of proof that the testator LACKED capacity.
B. Court will look at evidence from before, after and during the signing of the will, giving no
more weight to one factor over the other.
1. Courts also will decipher between an insane delusion and a mistake of belief.
a. Example: Mother takes daughter out of will because she thinks that she is
stealing her jewelry. This may be wrong but, this doesn’t mean that the mother
is dillusional.
b. Example: If a Father (in his older years) writes daughter out of will because he
says that this is not his daughter, this is dillusional because he has no basis for
saying this.
2. Mistaken beliefs don’t effect testamentary capacity
C. Standing consists of➾
1. You would be an heir in intestate (ie: you would benefit financially) OR
2. The decedent had a prior valid will in which you were a beneficiary.
Page 53 of 111
GROUNDS TO CONTEST A WILL
6. §732.5165 – Effect of Fraud, Duress, Mistake and Undue Influence

A. states that a will is invalid if it procured by fraud, undue influence, duress, mistake or
fraud.
B. If only part of the will is procured by such, then only that part is invalid.
FRAUD
1. If a testator was fraudulently induced to execute or transfer a will, the will (or the fraudulently
induced portion) is not eligible for probate.
A. Fraud occurs when a person intentionally misrepresents material facts to a testator
intending for testator to rely, to his detriment on these misrepresentations.
2. 2 TYPES of FRAUD
A. fraud in the inducement
Influenced or induced a person to execute a will
B. fraud in the execution
Tricking a person into signing a will stating that it is another document
3. BURDEN OF PROOF
A. The party contesting that is asserting fraud has the burden of proof.
B. Difficult burden.
C. Example➾ Husband dies and is survived by his wife and a brother. Husband transferred
the rights of his restaurant while he was alive to his brother. Widow now is attempting to
assert a claim of a fraudulent transfer because she claims that her husband was unable
to get a liquor license so he transferred his ownership to his brother.
1. This is not fraud. The husband did not transfer his ownership based on any
fraudulent method by the brother. There are no facts to show that the husband did
anything other than what he wanted. Therefore, no fraud.
4. NOTE: This is the least used avenue to contest the will because it is the hardest to prove.
5. Steps to take legal practice
A. STEP ONE➾Attorney should look towards transfers of property:
1. What assets belong to the probate estate?
a. Did the decedent make any transfers?
(1) Was there a wrongful transfer of property?
(a) If a pre-death transfer was done improperly with fraud (or by
some other means from below) to an item out of the probate
estate you need to have the transfer set aside from the rest.
B. STEP TWO➾ Look at will and codicil:
1. Look towards the will and codicil to see if they were made under the influence of
one of above four grounds for contest.
2. Document could be declared entirely invalid or maybe only sometimes portions of
it invalid.
a. If someone could establish that the codicil was fraudulent then only that would
be thrown out.
(1) Example➾ Assume that an elderly man relies on a housekeeper and
she fraudulently gets him to leave her $10,000 in his will – only that gift
Page 54 of 111
will be held to be invalid but, the rest of the will can be distributed
accordingly.
MISTAKE
1. If a testator mistakenly executed (signed)a will thinking it was something else then the is not
eligible for probate.
2. Mistake means: a mistake in the execution of a document.
A. Example: A busy law firm attaches two different people’s wills together and has the
testator sign the document. This is a mistake in execution.
B. NOTE: MISTAKE MUST BE IN EXECUTION - NOT IN BELIEF
1. However, if the mistake in belief is so strange or so bizarre you might be able to
contest the will not because of mistake of belief but because of lack of
testamentary capacity.
2. Mistake in drafting or scrivner is not a mistake
3. Example 1: Mistake in belief on the part of the testator that someone is going to kill
him and that’s why he’s executing a will, is not a mistake that will invalidate a will
a. note: Little green men are going to kill him is not enough to warrant a lack of
testamentary capacity though.
4. Example 2: Mother writes son out of will because he never calls her. In actuality
he is really in a coma but since the mother made a mistake of fact and not in
execution, this provision of writing him out will be sufficient.
C. If the whole will is a mistake, the whole thing will be invalid; if only part is a mistake, only
that part will be held invalid
1. If only part of the will or codicil is the result of a mistake than that troublesome
clause won’t be enforced but the rest will.
a. A draftsman’s error generally will not render a will invalid.
2. Example: Testator wanted everything put in trust and give interest to A. At A’s
death he wished to give the corpus of the trust to his nieces and nephews.
However, he decided to amend this and give the interest to someone else but
keep the nieces and nephew’s corpus. The attorney made a mistake and deleted
the trust entirely. The nieces and nephews contested the will at the testator’s
death based on mistake.
a. Court held the codicil deleting the trust was invalid because of the attorney’s
error and left the original will intact.
b. Make sure that your client reads what he is signing prior to signing it to make
sure it comports with his intent.
Page 55 of 111
UNDUE INFLUENCE
1. If a testator was unduly influenced, the will (or unduly influenced portion) is invalid and not
eligible for probate. Most common claim.
2. To assert a claim, the allegations must be sufficiently specific that free will of testator
was destroyed such as with:
A. Over persuasion
B. Force
C. Coercion
D. Duress
3. Decided on a case by case basis
A. Acts occurring in the past are admissible
B. Remoteness goes to the weight, rather than to admissibility
4. 2 options for someone contesting
A. meet the burden by giving direct evidence, or
1. example: Video showing he was forced to sign at gun point.
B. raising a presumption of undue influence
5. Presumption is established if: [must prove all three]
1. NOTE: These three elements are all for indirect evidence however, with direct
evidence the following is not needed.
B. Show a confidential relationship between the decedent and the wrongdoer existed
1. confidential relationship means trust
a. This relationship may arise between any two people where the basis is
founded on a trust (i.e. neighbors)
2. Showing who the decedent relied upon, who brought them to the doctor, picked up
medicine, went grocery shopping is sufficient to establish a confidential
relationship.
a. Note: Simply showing that you spent time with the decedent (ie: went there for
dinner and got advise about your love life) does not show some sort of reliance
or dependency by the deceased (they could have that relationship with
anyone) that there was a confidential relationship.
b. Example: A confidential relationship doesn’t only have to be with your family.
Could be your realtor that you’ve known for over 18 years and that realtor also
picked up mail, etc.
3. Family relationship does not mean confidential relationship. A presumption does
not arise in a spousal relationship.
a. Example: A couple is married and a wife hounds her husband to change his
will every month. Florida law says that you can not prove undue influence in a
marriage – you must have direct evidence (ie: knife or smoking gun).
C. Show an active procurement of a will (or a provision of the will) by the wrongdoer
1. Courts will look at all relevant facts in order to determine active procurement, and
it goes on a case-by-case basis.
2. Active Procurement means a lot of pressure
a. Active procurement occurs where actions of wrongdoer prevented decedent
from exercising his or her own free will.
Page 56 of 111
b. In determining whether active procurement existed, the Court will consider the
criteria given in Carpenter:
(1) NOTE: Don’t have to meet all of these & this list is not exhaustive.
(2) Presence of the beneficiary at the execution of the will;
(3) Presence of the beneficiary on those occasions when the testator
expressed a desire to make a will;
(4) Recommendation by the beneficiary of an attorney to draw the will;
(5) Did beneficiary have knowledge of the contents of the will prior to
execution;
(6) Did beneficiary give instructions on preparation of the will to the attorney
drawing the will;
(7) Did beneficiary secure (find) witnesses to the will;
(8) Safekeeping of the will by the beneficiary subsequent to execution.
(9) Mere kindness (raking leaves or calling attorney for a neighbor) does not
equal active procurement, you need something more.
D. Wrongdoer must receive substantial benefit under will or codicil being objected to.
1. May indirectly receive a benefit
a. Doesn’t require that wrongdoer is a beneficiary under the will, just that for some
reason he benefited from the will
(1) Example: attorney drafting the will
b. Courts look at what gifts you would have gotten in a previous will or intestacy
and compare it to what you would have gotten had there been no will.
c. When the attorney is accused:
(1) If a lawyer is accused of undue influence you can still represent
decedent’s estate although it wouldn’t be a good idea.
(a) Florida Bar Rule 5-102 says that ethically you should cease
handling the estate.
(2) Should an attorney get accused and he is receiving a substantial
amount of money he can rebut it by showing that he prepared many
other wills and never received any gifts.
(a) Showing that attorney received a fee for his services is not
enough to show that he benefited by the will.
(3) If you are related to the testator and you are the attorney you can still be
accused of undue influence.
D. After the rebuttable presumption is raised.
1. If you can show the above elements (ie: confidential, procurement, etc.) then you
raise the rebuttable presumption that there was undue influence.
2. This proponent now has the burden to rebut the presumption by:
a. Giving reasonable explanation to refute allegation by explaining the reason
why they are accused of the wrongdoing (explain their true motives);
(1) All relevant factors will be considered in deciding this.
b. After proponent gives reasonable explanation burden shifts back to the
claimants claiming undue influence.
c. Judge in his deliberations may consider the following:
(1) At the time of signing the will:
(a) Age of decedent;
(b) Frailties (ex: were they on medication, hospitalized, doctor’s
visits);
Page 57 of 111
(c) What was person’s mental state;

(2) Who had contact with decedent; How often did he or she see her; Who
else was present when they were there;
(3) Did this person keep the testator away from anyone else (i.e. relatives,
other beneficiaries)
(4) Any peculiar disposition in the will (ex: money left to an organization that
person had no contact with);
(5) When was will written in relation to the death (ex: If written 14 years ago
obviously, the person liked it);
(6) Who had possession of the will;
(7) Is the beneficiary a natural recipient of the decedent’s bounty;
(8) Education of decedent and there business ability and how they manage
their money;
(9) Talk to people who knew decedent (ex: doctors, rabbi, pharmacist,
neighbor, attorney who drafted will-how often did he meet with the
decedent);
d. As an attorney for the decedent, a safeguard would be:
(1) Have the testator tell as many people as he can that he disinherited his
family;
(2) Make note for file.
E. If undue influence is successfully reached, then that portion or portions of the will that
were procured will be thrown out.
1. If not successful, the will goes through probate.
F. Estate of Carpenter (leading case in FL for undue influence)
1. Carpenter had 4 kids and died leaving everything to her daughter, Mary.
2. Presumption of undue influence by indirect evidence was successfully raised by
will contestants (the 3 sons) because they showed the following:
a. Confidential Relationship existed between mother/daughter
(1) Took care of sick mother
(2) Took her to hospital
(3) Drove her from city to city
(4) Trusted Mary to do her errands
b. Active in procuring the will
(1) Mary called her own attorney to do the will
(2) She was present when will was assigned
(3) Knew will existed
(4) Directed attorney in structuring the will
(5) Her attorney secured the witnesses
c. Substantial benefited
(1) Mary was the only beneficiary
3. Thus, the burden shifted to the proponent (Mary). Now, Mary had burden of
coming forward with a reasonable explanation for her active role in testatrix’ affairs
and specifically in preparation of will
a. She doesn’t have to prove that no undue influence existed, she just has to
show the reasons for having acted in that particular manner
b. If she fails to rebut the presumption, the ct presumes undue influence.
(1) In this case, proponent successfully rebutted the presumption of undue
influence by showing (among other things):
Page 58 of 111
(a) She was just doing what her mom asked her to do
(b) She was the only one there to do so
LACK OF TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY
5. Testamentary Capacity is not defined in the Statutes, only by Case Law.

6. Lack of testamentary capacity voids the will in total, not just partial invalidity.
7. §732.501- states any person 18 or more years old of sound mind may make a will
A. Testator must have testamentary capacity at time will is executed
1. Ct determines solely at the time they actually execute the will
C. No requirement that testator be competent at the time the witness signs the will.
8. To establish testamentary capacity
A. Testator should understand:
a. Nature and extent of his property
b. Natural objects of the testator’s bounty
(1) Who are the people that would normally be getting the estate
c. the practical affects of the disposition of the will as it has been executed
B. Attorney should:
1. Have testator bring letter from a doctor for the file that says that the testator is
mentally competent. (Preferably a young doctor so that he is around during
probate)
2. Have a list of a bunch of questions for testator to answer in front of witnesses:
a. Who’s the president; Who’s vice-president; Did you go on a cruise; Did you
speak to your grandchildren recently…etc. (shows that testator knew what was
going on).
9. Presumption of Testamentary Capacity Exists
A. A testator is initially presumed to have testamentary capacity when they sign a will
1. if someone wants to contest the capacity, they have the burden to prove a lack
there of by preponderance of the evidence
10. Circumstantial Evidence
A. Along with looking at testamentary capacity on day the will was executed, you may admit
evidence to show how the testator acted before and after executing the will.
1. Ct will consider:
a. Old age
b. Whether decedent’s disposition was consistent
(1) peculiar appearances or behavior
c. Whether decedent was on drugs/medication
(1) even abuse of controlled substances do not by themselves show lack of
testamentary capacity
(a) However, if testator was a known alcoholic, the attorney should
establish that they signed the will at a sane, lucid or un-high
moment.
B. Fletcher v DeLoach
1. Testator’s estate was going to be distributed equally.
2. Her eldest son died and she became depressed, then later she executed a second
will that pissed off the other kids.
Page 59 of 111
3. Ct looked at circumstantial evidence (from before and after) and determined she
lacked testamentary capacity when she executed the second will.
11. Insane Delusion
A. A will made by someone who is insane is valid if made during a lucid period
B. Insane Delusion, “Spontaneous conception and acceptance of fact that has no real
existence except in imagination.”
C. example: An 85 year old who persistently believes that Santa Clause is real might have a
problem here.
12. §744.331(6) Procedures in Determining Incapacity
A. The court may make findings of fact on the basis of clear and convincing evidence that a
person is incapacitated with respect to exercising a particular right or all rights.
1. NOTE: the ct will provide a written order that says:
a. the nature and the scope of their incapacities
b. the exact areas where a person lacks capacity to make informed decisions
c. the specific legal disabilities to which the person is subject
d. the specific rights that the person is incapable of exersiciing
2. Ct may expressly incapacitate someone from exercising certain rights but if they
don’t incapacitate them from “executing a will”
B. If a court declares decedent incompetent before executing his will then they are
presumed to lack competency in signing the will
C. From the time they are determined incompetent, the presumption will continue until the
disability is removed
13. MALICIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH INHERITANCE

A. A tortuous action (civil action) for malicious interference with inheritance:
1. alleges that absent a 3rd party’s actions, the Π beneficiary would have received a
greater portion of the decedent’s estate.
2. is brought after probate and is brought against the wrongdoer
a. must exhaust your remedies in probate court before raising this tort claim
(1) Note: THIS IS ONLY ALLOWED FOR A LOSER IN PROBATE
COURT.
B. To prevail, a Π must establish with reasonable certainty that absent the 3 party’s
rd
actions:
a. Π would have received a portion or a greater portion under decedent’s will;
and
b. ∆ intentionally intentionally engaged in wrongful conduct; and
c. ∆ ’s ill motivated actions influenced the decedent; and
d. ∆ ’s ill motivated actions were the proximate cause of Π receiving a lessor or
no share of the estate.
(1) Decedent had at one time a fixed intent of giving you a gift and BUT
FOR the actions of the wrongdoer you would have received it
(2) Π must prove testamentary intent.
Page 60 of 111
ADEMPTION
1. Ademption: Revocation or taking away of a legacy by an act of the testator.

A. It occurs when a testator, while living, gives the bequest to the legatee or substitutes
another bequest for that mentioned in the will.
B. It also can occur when the testator does something to make it impossible for his or her
will to be carried out.
1. Ex: If testator disposed of property before he or she died.
C. This ONLY applies to testate estates with a specific devise
1. Only Specific devises (gifts) can adeem (fail).
2. BUT if the testator no longer owns that devise when he dies, you get nothing
3. A devise can adeem (fail) in whole or in part
D. Types of devises where this applies
1. Specific Devise (devise = gift)➾ Gift of an item that can be identified and that
property may only be used to satisfy that gift.
a. includes identifiable tangible property and easily identifiable intangible property
b. What something is worth has nothing to do with a specific gift.
c. If the devise does not say "MY", then it is not a specific devise. The devise
would be general, and the personal rep would be responsible for going out and
getting the beneficiary that specific gift. Always, always, look for the word
"MY"!!!
d. Examples of specific devises
(1) cash is not a specific gift but, a coin collection is.
(2) real estate, but if property is no longer there, you don’t get the specific
gift
(3) If 100 shares of Mobil stock are left – this is not specific unless you have
exact stock certificate numbers.
(4) Specific bank account is ok because its easily identifiable (value of acct
is irrelevant)
(5) Picasso in my living room – easily identified tangible
(6) Installment contracts: Picasso to son, but sold it under an installment K
(term K to pay $ for Picasso)- son gets $ over term but not what has
already been paid
(7) promissory note to devise future term payments
e. Example of specific assets being sold:
(1) Will says, “Have my personal representative sell the DeGa painting and
gift the proceeds to my son.” If during the father’s life he forgets that he
made this devise, then sells the painting and puts the money into his
checking account which is left to his daughter then, the gift has
adeemed (been taken away).
2. Demonstrative Devise (Gift)➾ Fungible item that comes from a source. You
devise a gift and specify the source you want the gift to come from. If the item is
no longer there, the beneficiary is still entitled to the devise. In this instance, it
becomes a general devise. You are saying there is a particular place from which
you want the devise to come, but if the source is no longer there, the devise does
not adeem. It becomes a general devise.
Page 61 of 111
a. Money left in bank account #1234

b. Corn from a specific silo.
c. General Gifts➾ A general devise comes from the general estate. Money itself
is a general devise. A general devise comes from the general estate. Money
itself is a general devise.
(1) Example: Demonstrative gift can become a general gift in the following
manner: If a gift is left as ‘$1,000 to son from Nations Bank Account’
however, when father dies only $850 is left in his account. The $850 is
a demonstrative that has adeemed in part. If, at the end of the
administration of the will, there is money left over, the $150 can become
a general gift.
E. Adeemption may occur in whole or in part
1. If partial, you get what is remaining
a. ex: Steuben crystal set that now only has two pieces but originally had ten –
this gift has only adeemed in part, you get the 2 pieces.
F. Order on Test
1. Step One➾ Decedent must have died Testate;
2. Step Two➾ Apply objective test:
a. Determine if you have any specific devises given by testator, and
(1) Was it gift of stock? See §732.605 infra.
b. whether they where part of decedent’s estate at death.
3. Step Three➾ Look at intent of the testator: Did the testator intend for you to get
something?
a. Generally, intent of decedent is irrelevant if there is no gift left at time of death.
b. HOWEVER, Florida takes minority approach and allows intent; allows the use
of extrinsic evidence of testator’s intent to show that a gift has NOT adeemed.
(ex: ask if decedent had a pattern of devising things, etc.)
(1) Example: Decedent provides in will that the proceeds of a (3rd party’s)
promissory note will go to a certain beneficiary. But payor pays off
testator before he died and during that time decedent never changed
will. After receiving the proceeds the decedent puts every cent of that
money into a separate bank account and doesn’t touch that account.
When he dies, because of ademption, you would get nothing BUT in
Florida . if beneficiary comes up with enough evidence about testator’s
intent, he may be able to assert that his gift did not adeem and get some
of the money in the bank account.
4. Step Four➾ Was it satisfied? See §732.609 infra.
2. §732.609 Ademption by Satisfaction
A. Property that a testator gave to a person in the testator’s lifetime is treated as a
satisfaction of a devise to that person, only if:
1. If the will specifies that a gift could be an ademption; or
2. The testator acknowledges the intent to give a gift as an ademption in another
writing; or
3. The beneficiary acknowledges in writing that he accepts the gift as satisfaction of
ademption.
B. Generally, dispositions of property in a testators will are unaffected if given away during
the lifetime.
Page 62 of 111
1. Meaning, your gift is erased because I delivered or satisfied it during my lifetime.

This is generally applicable to Inter-Vivos transfers made AFTER the will is signed.
a. Example: Will gives away 100 shares of stock; he gives car to Alice while alive.
Just
C. Only occurs to specific bequests
D. Court will value the gift at the earlier of:
1. The date of decedent’s death, OR
2. The date gift was received.
3. REMEMBER: Go to §733.805 to determine the order of what assets get sold first to satisfy
devises (or debts, taxes, etc)
4. Examples of random issues:
1. Example #1➾ Critical to examine the wording of the transfer:
a. “All my interest in IBM stock and into” assume he sold the stock and got a bond
from IBM or got a note and mortgage from IBM.
b. Since this is still 1) an interest in IBM; and 2) is easily traceable, the beneficiary
of the IBM stock can easily get the mortgage and the note or the bond.
2. Example #2➾ Decedent specifically identifies stock or proceeds to a school in his
will. This stock company merged with another and therefore it wasn’t ABC stock
company anymore. The Court said the wording included this new stock and that
the old stock was traceable.
5. §732.605 Ademption of Gifts of Stocks
A. Generally, problems arise when a testator only gives portions of his stock to a devisee.
1. Any involvement that you have in a new stock, this statute makes it so that you
don’t have to change your will. This statute deals with whether the change (of
stock value, shares, etc) was of a voluntary act of the testator, other wise the court
knows to distribute that stock to your beneficiary.
B. §732.605(1) this section applies only when testator intended a specific devise of stock
(not their value). (requires a specific devise in order for it to kick in)
C. §732,605(2) ademption does apply to this
D. [WHICH IS IT??] some Massachusets court determined that stock splits do not effect the
value of the share of stocks, and that absent another provision in the will, the beneficiary
would get the stock plus any additions to stocks via stock splits. [OR IS IT:]
E. Watson v. Santalucia
1. In the absence of anything manifesting a contrary intent, a legatee of stock is
entitled to any additional shares received by a testator as the result of a stock split
occurring in the interval between the execution of a will and the testator’s death.
[WHICH DO WE APPLY, UNDER THIS ONE, WHAT HAPPENS FOR SPLITS
THAT OCCUR IMMEDIATELY AFTER DEATH? WOULD THIS BE A GOOD TIME
TO REFERENCE 733.805?
a. These splits must be after the signing of a will, and before the death of
decedent.
F. 2000 Shares of the stock; 100 shares are to go to three people; stock splits 4-1. Now the
people get 400 shares.
6. “On my death Blackacre to A”
7. If during the life of decedent, he gives Blackacre to B. This gift has adeemed f or A.
8. “On my death Blackacre to A”
9. If during the life of decedent, he contacts to sell Blackacre to A. On decedent’s death when
he finds out that he is left Blackacre, he can not get his money back.
Page 63 of 111
10. Accretion:
11. Accretion is appreciation in value or increases in wealth.
12. §732.606 Non Ademption
A. This is an exception to the General Rule, it says certain things will not adeem
B. 732.606(2) states that the following will go to the specific devisee rather than adeeming:
1. 732.606(2)(a) – balance of purchase price of any property sales still owed to
decedent at death goes to specific devisee (gets money left over from sale)
2. 732.606(2)(b) – If property is condemned, you shall receive the unpaid amount.
a. If everything was paid before death, specific devisee gets nothing here
3. 732.606(2)(c) – insurance proceeds paid after death will go to specific devisee
a. If everything was paid before death, specific devisee gets nothing here.
Actually, if the testator restored the house from the insurance proceeds, you
get the restored house. If they took the proceeds and moved somewhere else,
you get nothing. If the insurance proceeds have not come, and the testator
passes away, you get the proceeds from insurance when they do come in,
after the death of the testator.
C. 732.606(1)
1. NOTE: This § may be used by a specific devisee only if the testator has not been
competent for at least one year prior to death. [do I have this right??]
2. If specifically devised property is:
a. sold by a guardian of the property for the care and maintenance of the ward;
or
b. if a condemnation award or insurance proceeds are paid to a guardian of the
property as a result of condemnation, fire, or casulaty,
3. the specific devisee has the right to a general pecuniary devise (the net sale
proceeds) of the property specifically devised.
a. MEANING: you can only take what’s left but if after all proceeds are done you
can go back and claim rest if money is there. Example: Testator specifically
devises property in a will to A. But later decedent becomes incompetent and
guardian sells property to care of the incompetent decedent. In this scenario,
A would get the proceeds of what’s left when decedent dies. You are still
entitled to the full amount of what the guardian netted in the sale. Whether
there is enough money in the estate to satisfy that entitlement is another
question, but you are still entitled to that full amount.
4. Exception to the Exception
a. If decedent is no longer incompetent (regains legal capacity) and remains
competent for at least one year prior to death, then §732.606 no longer
applies, and the specific devisee would not get the proceeds. Instead,
stuff will adeem.
13. §733.803 - Exoneration

A. Under the Common Law Doctrine, if testator’s will did not say otherwise, a specific
devisee could get property free and clear a lien.
1. Meaning: that a person who is to receive a specific gift is entitled to get that gift
free of any liens or encumberences, this gives the specific devisee the right to
compel the personal representative to use other parts of the estate to pay any
liens or encumbrances off.
Page 64 of 111
B. In Florida, unless will says otherwise, the devisee takes the property subject to the
mortgage or liens on property
1. Meaning: in order for devisee to take property free and clear, testator must show
that he intended it free and clear by stating in the will “A gets property free and
clear of all liens.”
Page 65 of 111
LAPSED LEGACY
1. Lapse - The termination of a right or privilege to the devisee when a devise(gift) lapses (fails
for some reason).
A. Lapses applies to the person who gets it (the devisee himself). You look at people!!
B. Ademption applies to the property (the gift itself).
C. example: Testator’s will specifically devises property to A if A survives; But A has
predeceased the testator so the devise cannot take place. Thus, when a will fails, or a
gift fails, lapses applies.
2. Only takes place in testate estates.
A. NOTE: If all the gifts fail, will then goes through intestacy
3. At Common Law, a testamentary gift to a person who was dead at the time will was
executed or who failed to survive the testator lapses (unless the will says otherwise).
A. There are statutes to prevent this from happening:
1. §732.603
2. §732.604
4. Where a legacy (or distribution by will) has claimed to lapse, ct must decide:
A. Did the devise actually fail in regards to the person getting it?
1. Failure is judged as of the time the testator dies.
B. If there was a failure, what is the gift?
C. Then look to see if failed gift was disposed of in another manner by provisions in the will?
D. If no alternate plan in the will, then the gift fails and it lapses…UNLESS an anti-lapse
statute applies that will save it?
E. If an anti-lapse statute doesn’t apply, then it lapses and courts will determine appropriate
distribution of the failed gift. [DOES 733.805 APPLY HERE?]
5. Why gifts fail:
A. A condition in the will is not met
1. Generally, events that occur after decedent’s death do not effect the decedent’s
will.
a. Absent a clear and specific intent in the will, events that occur after the
testator’s death, will not affect the validity of the testamentary disposition of the
will.
2. In most cases, survivorship is required but a decedent may elongate this period by
a month, a week, a year – whatever he wants. It’s simply a condition.
a. example: When survival is a condition (“if you survive me”), or a condition
precedent (“only if you graduate from law school”).
b. example: Decedent has long-lost cousin, Fred, and leaves him $25,000 but
only if Fred claims it within 8 months. If he doesn’t claim it, the gift lapses.
(1) In general the person merely has to survive to get the gift.
B. Devisee predeceases testator
1. Example: Decedent leaves $1,000 to associate Robert if he survives the decedent.
Rob later dies.
a. Since Rob died the gift lapses and it goes back into the pot. The anti-lapse
statute does not protect him since he is not a lineal descendent of the
decedent’s grandparents.
Page 66 of 111
2. Example: Decedent leaves Ann a Nations Bank CD worth $10,000 only if she
survives him, if not, to Barry per stirpes.
a. If Ann dies before, then Barry gets the CD.
C. Someone is treated as having predeceased the testator (i.e. killer statute, divorce, etc.)
1. §732.507(2) says divorced spouse is treated as predeceased testator
a. Example: Decedent leaves the entire estate to spouse, if she doesn’t survive
me then to the ASPCA. Then him and his wife divorce and he dies.
(1) The divorce causes us by operation of law to treat her as dying before
him, so the ASPCA will get it.
b. Example: Decedent leaves all to wife, if she doesn’t survive then to her
children. They divorce and he dies.
(1) By operation of law the sons get it because the ex-wife is considered as
pre-deceasing the husband and since there was an alternate gift, sons
get the money.
c. Example: Decedent leaves all estate to spouse. There is no alternate
disposition or residuary clause. The couple divorces and then remarry each
other. The husband then dies, and they have no children.
(1) By operation of law, she is treated as pre-deceasing him [WHY?? THEY
REMARIED] and since there is no alternate disposition, then the estate
passes through intestacy. In intestacy the husband is considered as
having a wife and since no children, she gets it all.
6. Other ways a gift may fail:
A. When they are too vague.
1. example: “I leave $20,000 to my favorite charity” – this is too vague and will fail.
B. When they would be legally incapable to deliver.
1. example: “I leave 3 lbs. of cocaine in my dresser to my grandson”
2. example: “I leave my house to my friend Fred to be used as a Bowling Alley”…
however town ordinance doesn’t allow bowling alleys.
C. When a gift is practically difficult to deliver.
1. example: Large piano organ to china.
2. NOTE: Gifts that are merely factually difficult to deliver will be enforced.
a. example: Money left to stepchildren that testator hasn’t seen in years and
Personal Representative can not find them. Court says that the Personal
Representative should keep trying.
If you cannot find the beneficiary, the gift does not lapse. The gift is held for a period of
10 years, and if the beneficiary has not claimed it at that point, it escheats to the state.
7. §732.603 – Antilapse; Deceased Devisee; Class Gifts
A. §732.603 only applies to lineal descendents of the grandparents of the testator and not
ascendants.
1. This statute protects parents and grandparents of testator.
B. §732.603(2) LAPSES deals with devisees other than grandparents and their lineal
decendants
1. If a devisee named in a will predeceases a testator, or
2. predeceased execution of testator’s will, or
3. is required to be treated as a predeceasing the testator, AND
4. that person is not the testator’s grandparent or lineal decendant of grandparent,
5. Then that gift fails, it lapses!
Page 67 of 111
a. REMEMBER: testator can say survirorship is not necessary or tetstator can set
forth alternative beneficiary so gift does not fail
C. §732.603(1) ANTI-LAPSES deals with devisees that are grandparents or grandparents
lineal decendents
1. Where a gift would otherwise lapse because:
a. Beneficiary is dead at time of execution, or
b. Beneficiary predeceases the testator, or
c. Beneficiary is treated as predeceased,
2. AND, is a grandparent or lineal descendent of grandparent of the testator
3. THEN, the gift is saved; it will not lapse
a. If no lineal decendants, it lapses unless something is stated otherwise.
b. example: Decedent made a gift to his grandparent, who later predeceases
decedent.
(1) The Court will assume that the decedent wanted the legacy saved and
the gift will not lapse.
c. This only applies where there is NO contrary intention in the will.
(1) REMEMBER: Testator may specifically write in the will that this
provision doesn’t apply or “if grandfather survives me”. Ct will then
assume he didn’t want his legacy saved and gift will lapse
4. EXAMPLE: Assume Testator creates a trust in a will for spouse. The provision
was that if the spouse remarries or dies, the remaining money should go to the
testator’s brother.
a. The testator dies after both her husband and brother but, survived by her
brother’s son.
b. The nephew is a lineal descendent of the testator’s grandparent. Thus, gift to
brother is protected by the anti-lapse statute (732.603(1)).
5. Adoption➾
a. Legally adopted children are treated as lineal descendants of adopted parents
and are treated as a natural child under §732.108.
b. Step children and foster children are not protected under §732.603.
c. NOTE: the exceptions to where an adopted can claim from natural father also
apply here
8. Estate of Griffen
A. None of the people named were alive when the testratrix died
B. If all gifts fail, will goes through intestacy
1. example: Could B’s adopted daughter inherit through intestacy?
a. No, because mother is not a lineal descendant of testatrix. (Granddaughter is
only a stepgrandhild.)
C. Decedants said she intended to give it to her heirs
D. Ct said language in will was ambiguous
1. “and her heirs”…describes gift as being fee simple.
2. “and her heirs”…will be given their legal meaning absent any other direction in the
will.
E. Ct held absent a clear and specific intent in the will, events that occur after the testator’s
death, will not affect the validity of the testamentary disposition of the will.
To prevent a gift from lapsing, be very explicit. Do not depend on the words "to his heirs and
assigns forever." Show a clear intention in the will.
9. Ademption vs Exoneration
Page 68 of 111
A. Difference between the two is that with

1. Ademption – you ask “is property still there,” and
a. example: “My house to friend” – if you sell house and rent apartment  It
adeems
2. Exoneration – you ask “is person still there”
a. example: “My house to friend” – where friend is dead or is treated as dead,
§732.603(2) governs because no matter what situation occurred, the friend is
not a grandparent or lineal descendant of grandparent.
10. Residuary
A. When a Non-Residuary gift of a will lapses, and §732.603 is inapplicable, then if no
alternate disposition, this money becomes part of the rest and goes to whoever gets the
residue (or the residuary of probate property). If no clause of who gets this “remainder” in
will, then the Court says to check the intestacy.
1. NOTE: You can specifically disinherit someone and they could get your money
through intestacy in the above example.
a. Mere words like “I hate my family and they get nothing” will not change the fact
of the above example. If you don’t dispose of your wealth properly by including
a residuary clause, heirs will get it.
B. §732.604 Failure of Testamentary Provision
1. Once monies become part of the residuary:
a. When part of the residuary clause fails (assuming these people aren’t
beneficiaries pursuant to 732.603), and the residue is devised to two or more
persons and the share of one of the residuary devisees fails for any reason, his
or her share passes to the other residuary devisee, or to the other residuary
devisees in proportion to their interests in the residue.
2. If only one residuary beneficiary and the gift fails then the residuary goes to
intestacy.
a. Meaning, if entire estate residue is devised to one person, then it goes to
intestacy.
(1) Policy➾ Done because Courts don’t want legacy’s to lapse and they
want devises to vest.
(2) COURTS FAVOR TESTACY OVER INTESTACY
3. Under §732.611, must distribute per stirpes (unless the will states otherwise).
11. Class Gifts (Lapses and Anti-Lapses)
A. Gifts made in a will to a group of people in a certain category or who bear a specific
relationship to the decedent, rather by each individual’s name.
1. Example: $100,00 to each of my grandchildren; $1,000 to each member of the
sales staff at Gucci Bal Harbor. (Rosa’s will)
B. If a will includes a class gift, and one or more but not all, members of the class
predecease or are treated as predeceased, then:
1. At common law, whatever predeceased person’s gift was then gets distributed to
the remaining members
2. FL applies statute §732.604 (2)(lapse or anti-lapse apply) and the gift will not lapse
and the surviving members all share the money, but if they all die, the gift lapses
a. If applied to one member of the class, then that member’s share is saved
Page 69 of 111
(1) Example: Four people in a class: A,B,C,D; When A dies…lapse statute

applies so rest of class gets it;
(2) When D dies (where D is grandparent or LD of grandparent), anti-lapse
statute applies and D’s descendants get it,
(a) unless all the members in the class are dead, where then it
lapses
C. Three Questions to ask in a Class Gift:
1. Whether a testator’s disposition is a class gift which a specific person was a
member of the class.
2. If person who was member of class fails to survive testator, does the gift fail of
lapse or is it saved by the antilapse statute.
3. Was it the proper disposition of this asset. (ex: intestacy, residuary, other
members, etc.)
a. Should I give it to the remaining class members.
b. Presumption is that if when persons to receive gift are named – even if the
class is mentioned – presumption is that it is not a class gift.
(1) ex: $10,000 to my children Alice and Bob.
Page 70 of 111
ABATEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION
1. ABATEMENT
A. Is when you reduce a devise because insufficient assets in the testator’s estate to satisfy
debt, costs of administration, and paying off the beneficiaries/devises of the will.
1. Generally, this is a result when people die with less $ than they had when they
wrote will.
B. Only applies in Testate estates.
C. Example:
1. Testator leaves $100,000 to A; $50,000 to B; and $200,000 to C. He only has
$75,000 at death – Abatement and Contribution addresses this problem.
a. Decedent may put in will what assets are to be used to pay debts, bills, etc
before the Personal Representative decreases anyone else’s gifts.
2. If not mentioned – see §733.805
D. §733.805 Order in which assets are appropriated (statute is used if testator is silent on
this)
1. §733.805(1) A testator is free to determine what order probate property is to be
used
a. example: 100K to A; 200K to B, rest to C; he dies with 325K and 15K in debts.
(1) Will can say “but any debt owed should be paid out of gift to B, before
gifts to A and C”
(2) Thus, B will only get 185K
b. If in the previous example, he doesn’t say it and you don’t have enough money
to pay off debt, Always look first to see if the testator directs you where to take
from in order to pay off debts of the estate.
c. §733.805(1) tells you in what order property will be reduced.
NOTE: statute reduces the 1st, and if that value isn’t enough, proceed down
the list reducing the legacies that are given until value is sufficient to pay
debts.
(1) property not disposed of by the will;
(a) example: could be effect of not including residuary clause, so this
property will go through intestacy
(2) property devised in the residuary clause
(3) property not specifically or demonstratively devised
(a) General Devisee (generally devised property)
(b) ex: $20,000 to A or $50,000 to B.
(4) property specifically or demonstratively devised
(a) ex: The necklace, the condo, etc.
(5) Note➾ Can’t touch things that are not probate property
(a) ex: Life Insurance, Joint Accounts, etc.
2. REMEMBER➾
a. Specific Devises: Can only be satisfied by the delivery of a specific item.
(1) Gifts by will of property that is particularly designated; the only way to
satisfy that gift is by giving that particular piece of property
(a) example: my 10 shares in IBM stock, my oak rocking chair, etc.
(2) Specific is the most protected type of gift;
Page 71 of 111
b. Demonstrative Devise: Gift of money, stock, or any fungible item payable out of
a specific source or fund.
(a) example: I give 10 shares to Sam to be paid out of the sale
proceeds of my IBM stock
(2) Demonstrative is the second most protected type of gift.
(3) It is an unconditional gift, that does not adeem like a specific devise
does.
(4) §733.805(2) A demonstrative gift will be classified as a general devise if
the funds/property from which the payments are to be paid are
unavailable/insufficient to satisfy the gift, but only to the extent of the
insufficiency
c. General Devise: Any gift made to person that can be satisfied from anywhere
or any portion of testator’s estate.
(1) example: money is the most common
d. Residuary Devise: It’s a type of general devise; An “everything else” devise
(1) A residuary devisee generally has to wait until everything else is done
(all debts are paid, all other devises are distributed)
Be careful not to exclude your family unintentionally by leaving everything to
them in the residuary clause. Any money owed by the estate will come from
the residuary, which could end up leaving family nothing. Specific and
demonstrative devises have greater protection under the statute.
3. §733.805(2) Certain devises are preferred over other devises in the same class.
a. Devises supported by valuable consideration are entitled to preference
b. Devises given to the surviving spouse are entitled to preference
(1) example: 200K to wife, 200K to daughter, rest to son; When he died he
was worth 305K and had 100K in debts
(a) Under §733.805, 100K is taken out of daughter’s legacy first,
205K is left
(b) Wife gets the 200K and daughter gets 5K, nothing is left so son
gets
A prenuptial agreement destroys the spouse's right to preferential treatment, and
both the spouse and child in the same category would split the difference after
taxes.
2. §733.805(2) CONTRIBUTION
A. The remaining devisees may be called upon to reduce their share to aid the injured
devisee pro rata of their share
1. example: gross estate is worth 100K; 60K in savings in bank A, 30K in a cd in
bank B, 10K in checking in bank C;
a. Will says bank A to Sam; B to Joe; 2/3 residue to Sam and 1/3 residue to Joe
b. Owe 20K in debts
c. Residue is insufficient to pay, so get other 10K from:
(1) savings since it is more liquid, but Joe will then have to contribute his
pro rata (proportionate) share back to Sam
(2) Ultimately, Sam takes 2/3 of debt ($6.6K)and Joe contributes 1/3 of his
share ($3.3K) to satisfy debt.
(3) Thus, Sam ends up with 53.4K; Joe ends up with 26.7K
Page 72 of 111
SIMULTANEOUS DEATH AND SURVIVORSHIP
1. Requirement of Survivorship:
2. Court focuses on:
3. At what time did the gift become the property of this person.
4. Example: Gift vests at decedent’s death but, right to possess is postponed.
5. “Income to A for life, remainder to B”
(a) ✓If B dies before A, his heirs get the money
6. “Income to A for life, remainder to B if he survives A.”
(a) ✓If B dies before A, his heirs won’t get the money.
7. Look to the wording of the will.
8. Courts favor conditions subsequent rather than a condition precedent.
9. Law favors early vesting of survivors.
10. Words in will are given their ordinary and plain meaning absent an ambiguity.
(a) ✓Judges are allowed to interpret and construe wills. However,
Judges are not supposed to listen to extrinsic evidence when first
reading the will – not until he reaches an ambiguity may he look
beyond the four corners of the document.
11. Courts can not re-write wills.
12. Boone County National Bank
13. Family tried to assert that there was an ambiguity in the document. Court found no such
ambiguity. In situations like this Court may generally not look past the four corners of the
document and may not correct a draftsman’s error. There are two exceptions:
14. Draftman’s error must appear clearly on the face of the document.
15. ex: “the” is spelt as “eht”
16. Draftman’s error must be made to reflect what the will should have been the correct outcome
had the error not been made.
17. ex: Decedent always refers to kids in will as Frank, Fred and Ginny…but one time he
referred to them as Frank, Fred, and Jeanne.
18. Court can change this.
19. Court relied on the Statute of Wills in concluding here:
20. stated that because there are such stringent rules in having someone sign a will – this must
be the decedent’s intent.
21. When there is confusion as to a will➾
22. Look at laws of construction.
23. Go by the plain meaning of the document, look for ambiguity, etc.
24. Court favors early vesting of devises.
25. If still lost with ambiguity, then Court might have to look beyond the four corners.
Page 73 of 111
KILLER FORFEITURE STATUTE
1. §732.802
2. We don’t let wrongdoers benefit from their acts.
3. Person who intentionally and unlawfully kills or participates in procuring the death of the
testator is precluded from taking from the estate.
4. We treat the wrongdoer as failing the survive the testator.
5. Killing in self-defense does not bar you here but, assisting a suicide does because you are
aiding in the death.
6. §732.802(3)
7. Deals with situations where a named beneficiary in insurance policy or other contractual
relationships is not entitled to the proceeds and is treated as predeceasing the testator.
8. Example➾
9. Frank has a will which states “Blackacre to my son Sam and the rest, residue, etc to my
friend Charlene.” Frank was killed by his son Sam. Frank is survived by Sam, Sam’s son
(and Frank’s grandson) Gordon as well as Charlene.
10. Because Sam killed Frank he is treated as predeceasing his father because of the killer
forfeiture statute. However the gift of Blackacre is preserved by the Anti-lapse statute to go
to Gordon. Here the Courts do want to procure the sins of the father on his son.
11. Charlene takes what’s left (about $1,000,000)
Page 74 of 111
DOCUMENTS RELATED TO WILLS
1. §709.08 Durable Power of Attorney

A. Power of Attorney➾ written document which gives authority to someone else to act on
my behalf.
1. Regular (limited) Power of Attorney can not be used after authority is deemed
incompetent.
2. Durable Power of Attorney will survive the person’s incompetence.
B. Requirements:
1. Must be in writing (can not be oral);
2. Must be signed by person giving the power, and must conform to the following:
a. 2 witness’ signatures with their signed and printed names.
b. These witnesses must see the power sign it.
3. Have it notarized but it is not a requirement.
4. MUST contain the following magic words: “This durable power of attorney is not
effected by subsequent incapacity of the principal except as provided in Statute
709.08 Fl. Statutes” or similar words that show this document lasts through
incapacity.
C. Timing: In Florida➾ D Pof A goes into effect the day that it is signed.
1. No “sprining power” in FL
a. Can not be a “springing” document (ie: only effective at a later date)
2. But FL has, §709.11 – Deployment Contingent Power of Attorney
a. Applies to all people going to war
b. Signed in advance, and says powers go into effect if troops are sent overseas.
D. Who May be a D P of A:
1. Must be 18 years old;
2. Must be of sound mind;
3. Can even nominate a financial institution as defined in Chapter 655 with trust
powers, having a place of business in this state and authorized to conduct trust
business in this state.
4. Can even name a not-for-profit organization, organized for charitable or religious
purposes in this state, and is qualified as a court appointed guardian prior to
January 1, 1996, and which is a tax exempt organization under 26 USC §501(c)
(3).
5. May name more than one D Pof A.
a. However if two people are chosen as D Pof A, then unanymous decisions must
be made;
b. If more than two people are chosen, then only a majority rules to make
decisions.
(1) Individual not agreeing may dissent, and they will subsequently not be
held liable.
E. Generally, a D Pof A can not be delegable.
1. Example: Father can not transfer to son, etc.
F. Limited Life:
1. The D Pof A ends on certain factors:
a. Death;
Page 75 of 111
b. When principal while alive and competent revokes it;

2. Still enforced if person is deemed incompetent
a. As long as no one goes to the Court and says that the Power of Attorney isn’t
doing his job or that they feel the incompetent guy is getting mistreated – the
Durable Power of Attorney lasts.
G. Reliance on D P of A by third parties
1. A third party may rely on a D Pof A that is properly prepared until:
a. Notice is sent that person can not act as D Pof A;
(1) Must be in writing and served on the person or entity to be bound by
such notice.
(2) Must also be sent certified or in some manner which the person has to
sign for it.
b. Policy holder himself calls and says that Power Holder can’t act.
rd
c. 3 party receives notice that proceedings (guardianship) have begun to declare
principal incompetent.
d. If a bank is defrauded but were unaware that you could not act anymore, then
they are not liable.
e. Unless D Pof A says otherwise, you are giving them the power to act over
everything.
(1) EXCEPTION: Homestead will not be included unless says so in D Pof A.
H. Fiduciary Duties of Power Holder
1. Fiduciary duties are owed by the power holder ( who has power of attorney)
2. Power Holders who act in good faith on the part of the principal aren’t liable, even
if they lose money but, if they act in bad faith, they are.
I. Rights of Power Holder
1. Holder of D Pof A have extensive rights in regards to property.
2. What CAN’T you authorize someone to do:
a. Vote in public election;
b. Exercise powers or authorities granted to the principal as trustee or as court
appointed fiduciary.
c. Perform duties under a contract that requires the exercise of personal services
of the principal.
d. Create, amend, sign, revoke a codicil or will for you.
e. Can’t do what D Pof A says not to;
f. If document is silent about the creation or transferring of trust funds then the
holder has no right to touch these;
g. D Pof A must specify BOTH financial and medical matters…..If document is
silent, only financial matters will be interpreted.
2. Health Care Advance Directives

A. §765.101(1) - Advance Directive
1. means a witnessed, written document, or oral statement…
a. In which instructions are given by a principal or
b. in which the principal’s desires are expressed concerning any aspect of the
principal’s health care, and includes, but is not limited to:
(1) a living will, or
(2) the designation of a health care surrogate, or
(3) orders not to resuscitate issued pursuant to §401.45.
Page 76 of 111
B. §765.304 - Living Will

1. §765.101(10) – defines “Living Will” as a document where a person indicates
when they are to die if their condition is such that they cannot be brought back to
normal existence and they could only be kept alive by artificial support systems.
a. Has nothing to do with distribution of property, it governs when a decedent dies
2. A written statement that a person signs (says), and is only applicable if:
3. They are terminally ill;
a. Basically says doctors must say that you can not be cured by medical science.
b. §765.101(17) – defines terminal condition
(1) A condition caused by injury, disease, or illness from which there is no
reasonable probability of recovery and which, without treatment, can be
expected to cause death; or
(2) A persistent vegetative state characterized by permanent and
irreversible condition of unconsciousness in which there is:
(a) The absence of voluntary action or cognitive behavior of any kind;
(b) An inability to communicate or interact purposefully with the
environment.
4. Florida states that this can only be done in writing.
a. FL statutes provide forms for a living will
5. Valid from date you sign it.
6. Under §765.304(1), you must use one doctor to allow life not to be sustained
7. Purpose: save pain of family and allow death with dignity, also prevents assets
from being depleted.
8. §765.302 outlines the procedure for making a living will, includes notice to doctor
C. §765.202 Designation of Health Care Surrogate
1. Written document designating a surrogate to make health care decisions for a
principal
a. §765.101(16) – defines “surrogate” as any competent adult expressly
designated by a principal to make health care decisions on behalf of the
principal on behalf of the principal’s incapacity.
2. §765.202(1) must be signed in presence of two witnesses, or principal may direct
another person to sign their name
3. §765.202(2) person designated as surrogate may not be a witness; and at least
one person who acts as a witness shall be neither the principle’s spouse nor blood
relative
4. §765.202(3) Allows designation of an alternate surrogate.
a. Need to determine ahead of time if surrogate will be able to go through with it.
But just in case, designate an alternate.
5. §765.202(7) this establishes a rebuttable presumption of clear and convincing
evidence that the principal intended to designate a surrogate
D. §765.104 - Revocations
1. An Advance Directive (living will) or Designation of a surrogate may be revoked at
any time by a competent principal:
a. signed, dated writing;
b. physical cancellation or destruction;
c. oral expression of intent to revoke;
d. sign a new one.
Page 77 of 111
2. Note: Same as in wills, a divorce will nullify the naming of a spouse as a health
care provider.
3. Note: 2 witnesses needed for these.
a. Surrogate should not be one of the witnesses.
4. Note: Must be competent but, just like wills, the presumption is with competence.
E. §765.101 Definitions
1. §765.101(9) - Life Prolonging Procedure -
a. Any medical procedure, treatment, or intervention which:
(1) Utilizes mechanical or other artificial means to sustain, restore, or
supplant a spontaneous vital function;
(2) When applied to a patient in a terminal condition, serves only to prolong
the process of dying.
b. Though it’s broadly defined, it does not include administration of pain medicine.
2. §765.101(14) - The Principal
a. the person who is giving the power to the agent.
(1) This person holds a “health care proxy”.
3. §765.101(15) – Proxy
a. A competent adult who has not been expressly designated to make health-care
decisions for a particular incapacitated individual, but who, nevertheless, is
authorized pursuant to §765.401 to make health care decisions for such
individual.
(1) §765.401authorizes the following:
(a) the judicial appointed guardian of the patient;
(b) the patient’s spouse;
(c) an adult child of the patient;
(d) a parent of the patient;
(e) the adult sibling of the patient;
(f) an adult relative of the patient;
(g) a close friend.
F. §765.102 Legislative Findings and Intent -
1. Public Policy of these provisions:
a. You have fundamental right under the Constitution to make own decisions to
choose or refuse medical treatment.
b. Florida recognizes physical as well as mental incapacities.
G. §732.910 Legislative Declaration
1. States legislative purpose is to promote public interest to encourage and aid
medical research advancements.
a. Also, regulates the gift of a body or parts of a body, to be made after death of a
donor.
Page 78 of 111
TRUSTS
1. Why People Set Up Trusts:
Because they want someone else to manage their assets.
To avoid probate.
Probate is a transfer of property by will to another (beneficiary), at death of the property
owner
A. Will Substitutes (Also called Non-Probate Property)are used to avoid probate:
1. Life Insurance policies (Contract payment with a named beneficiary)

2. Property held by Tenancy by the Entirety(right of survivorship)
3. Proprty held by Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship
4. Pension Plans(contract payment)
5. Homestead Property
6. Inter-Vivos Trusts
NOTE: validity of will substitutes(Non-Probate Property)  FORM over substance
B. Probate Property:
1) Stocks
2) Annuities
3) Personal Property
To obtain protection against the creditors of the beneficiaries.

Must have a SpendThrift Clause in the trust to protect from the creditors of the
Beneficiary from reaching into the trust to pay debt.
Tax Implications
Federal Taxes
1) Gift Tax: Tax on property given by the owner to another
2) Estate tax: Tax on estate property owned at death
3) Income tax: Tax on income earned each year
Revocable Trusts:
Substance governs over form. If the assets are revocable, then it is assumed that
the property is still owned by the settlor and he is responsible for taxes related to
the property
Vehicles for Charitable Goals
2. Types of Trusts
Page 79 of 111
Express Trusts
Private Express Trusts

Elements:
1) Res
2) Trust Intent
3) Trustee
4) Beneficiary
Charitable Trusts
Resulting Trusts
Two ways to have a resulting trust
1) The trust does not completely dispose of the trust property
Settlor retains a reversionary interest in the trust property
2)
Constructive Trusts
A remedy for someone’s wrong doing.
Elements Needed to have a Constructive Trust imposed:
Breach of a promise between the transferor and the transferee leading to unjust
enrichment of the transferee
A confidential relationship
Fraud
Undue Influence
Tranferor was in contemplation of death
The only duty of a trustee in a constructive trust is to transfer the asset to the intended
beneficiary when asked for.
Honorary Trusts
A. Totten Trust: “The Grandma Trusts”

1. written as Jane Doe ITF John Smith.
a. ITF means “payable on death to”
2. Beneficiaries receive money per capita and not per stirpes.
3. This type of trust is fully revocable.
B. Revocable Inter Vivos (created during lifetime) Trust;
1. AKA  Living trust or Grantor trust
C. Testamentary Trust;
1. Takes effect when the trustee dies
2. Created in the will
a. In the will, you name the trustee and the beneficiaries and describe the trust.
3. Testamentary Trusts are ALWAYS Irrevocable
3. General Provisions
Page 80 of 111
A. Under a typical trust, the settlor (owner of property) transfers assets to himself or a 3rd
party. That person becomes a trustee.
1. A trust is not a will and therefore does not conform to the rules of a will.
a. Example: Divorce doesn’t sever rights to trustee, unless stated in trust (form)
2. Done pursuant to a writing. Usually in written form.
3. A settlor may name themselves as the beneficiary in a trust AS LONG AS there is
a
B. Generally, a trust is not revocable and is etched in stone.
1. Unless, the grantor includes a provision in the trust reserving the right to revoke or
amend it.
a. Settlor usually retains authority to revoke or amend it and a right to income
from trust during his lifetime.
(1) Example: “while I’m alive, I can get income from the asset in the trust.
When I die, the trust income and assets will be distributed to
beneficiaries.”
(2) Example: “This Trust can only be altered on the top of the Empire State
Building”
(a) then that provision will be honored.
2. Absent evidence that grantor revoked trust in writing, it remained enforceable.
C. Jurisdiction –trusts that can be revoked during lifetime are legally recognized in all states
D. Why you want a trust
1. you don’t have to wait for probate to get family allowance
2. When you put property into a Trust, must have their documents changed.
a. Example: Must move assets from deed of house held as “BILL SMITH” to “BILL
SMITH AS TRUSTEE FOR THE TOM JONES REVOCABLE TRUST”
(1) Unless you do this, simply having the trust document will do you no
good.
(2) problems occur when you execute a non-funded trust
3. Trusts aren’t only used as estate planning devices. A trust is basically when a
trustee manages property for others known as beneficiaries (proper property
management).
a. Trustee is the legal owner but the Beneficiary has equitable ownership (the
right to use and benefit).
4. Two ways to create a trust:
A. Deed of trust
1. To a third person
2. May be real or personal property
3. AKA - trust agreement
4. Under this the settlor is a trustee
B. Declaration of trust
1. Only for personal property (cannot be for real property)
2. declare yourself the trustee of your property
3. Doesn’t have to be in writing if the beneficiary will get it before grantor's death. If
the beneficiary will not get it until the grantor's death, it is considered testamentary
in character, therefore it must be in writing. The best practice is to always put it in
writing.
4. Pre-select the person who will manage your assets if you become incompetant
Page 81 of 111
a. Since people are living longer, take care of what is going to happen after you
become incompetant
C. Pour Over Trust
1. example: Testamentary Pour Over into an inter vivos trust
2. How they work: you need a will, in addition you have an inter vivos trust, the
residue of the will goes into the trust
a. Typically, the will only governs small amounts of money because the bulk of
the money was put in the trust.
3. Document merely:
a. names a PR;
b. states to have property go through probate but pour them over into the trust.
(1) Insurance Co. that pays medical bills to person individually would be
considered probate property.
c. REMEMBER: The trust must conform to all the formalities of a will.
4. Any assets included in your will that you want to pour over into an inter vivos trust
must go through probate, so those assets will not be available right away. Be sure your
clients know that those assets will not be available for 6-12 months, most likely.
5. Four Requirements to Create a Valid Trust (not in statutes)

A. Must have a settlor.
1. Also known as the grantor.
2. person who creates the trust with the intent to create a trust.
3. Administrative (give powers and duties to trustee) and dispositive (who
beneficiaries are and what they get) provisions.
4. Generally a written instrument.
5. Settlor can be the trustee and a beneficiary of own trust.
B. Must have a trustee.
1. Person who has legal title and manages the money.
C. Must have at least one beneficiary.
1. This person has equitable ownership (benefits from trust).
D. Must have “Corpus” or “Res”.
1. This is something of value in the trust (assets/property)
2. the actual assets/property in the trust
In Florida, 732.513(d) says that just because you did not put any res in the trust does not make
the trust invalid.
6. Requirements in detail➾
A. Trust must contain two general terms:
1. Dispositive Terms: Outlines assets, who is to get assets and when;
(1) Res – something of value in trust
2. Administrative Terms: Outline the powers and the duties of the trustee. Indicate
how the trust is to be managed, spent, etc.
a. Names three parties:
(1) Settlor – person that creates the trust with the intent to do so;
(2) Trustee – person who now has legal ownership to trust and manages it.
(3) Beneficiary – person(s) who benefits from trust, has equitable
ownership;
7. SETTLOR
A. Person who creates trust through will or other device with intent to create it
Page 82 of 111
B. Intent Requirement
1. Must show that the settlor had the intent to develop the relationships in the trust
a. Need element of intent because trusts may not be created by accident – they
must be created intentionally.
b. Example: “I want you, trustee, to hold this item for the benefit of B, beneficiary”
2. Language must show settlor’s clear manifestation of intent to create a trust.
a. Best Evidence to show clear manifestation of intent:
(1) He put this property into a trust, AND
(2) that he actually delivered the property to the trust (via trustee)
(a) Problems arise when the settlor fails to complete the transfer
because then the corpus is dry
3. Need present intent to create a trust – future intent is not sufficient.
a. Cannot be a promise to create a trust in the future, but right now!!
b. Farmers Loan v Winthrop : Woman put 5K in a valid trust granting herself a life
estate, naming bank as trustee. She knew she would be getting money from
her husband’s estate later which would go in her trust. She wrote a deed of
trust (giving to a 3rd party). She gave 2 powers of attorney in her trust. One
authorized Farmer to collect and receive any and all cash, shares of stock, and
any property to which she might be entitled to form her husband.
(1) most of the money went in her trust, but when she died, 1.4M hadn’t
been placed into trust yet. Her estate wanted the money to go into the
estate, not her trust. The beneficiaries for each were different.
(2) Trust didn’t say Farmer must transfer the money into trust, it just gave
them permission to do it in the future. Thus, $ went to estate.
(3) She should have stated that she currently intends that particular transfer
to go to the trust.
4. Invalid if Precatory Language is used to create: language used by the settlor that
implies a moral obligation but is not binding upon the trustee.
a. TEST to determine if Precatory Language formed trust Ct looks at:
(1) Relationship b/t settlor and beneficiary
(2) Relationship b/t settlor and trustee
(3) All estate planning information surrounding the possible trust
b. Examples of non-binding precatory language: “I hope” or “I wish”
(1) Instead use direct words like “shall” or “must” or “I intend”
c. Colton v Colton : Husband asked wife to give his mother and sister, and hopes
that she will use her best judgment in deciding what to give them. He gives
everything to wife and leaves decisions to her. He dies. Wife hates mother and
sister-in-law and refuses to give them anything.
(1) Widow argues that she was not directed to give them anything because
a trust was never created. Wife claims it was merely precatory
language, trial court agreed.
(2) Appellate court disagreed. They looked at surrounding circumstances:
He wrote it the day before he died, and probably did it very quickly. He
probably intended it to be a demand, rather than a mere desire to give
them assets. Widow had to hand some assets over.
C. Writing Requirement
1. Trusts for the following property must be in writing:
Page 83 of 111
a. §689.01 Trust for Real Estate must be put in writing to conform with the Statute
of Frauds
b. §737.111 Testamentary Aspects of trust– (means through will) invalid unless
executed with the formality of a will
c. §689.06 Naming another as a trustee
2. Trusts for the following DO NOT require a writing:
a. Tangible personal property (excluding real estate)
b. Intangible personal property
(1) Example: A settlor of a trust may verbally declare that he owns personal
property and manifests the intent to hold it in a trust for someone else.
3. NOTE: A settlor usually does not verbally declare trust, most trusts are in writing
8. TRUSTEE
A. Person who has Legal Title (Ownership) of trust assets, holds and manages the trust.
1. acting as a trustee cannot be imposed on someone (must not be forced)
a. they must be willing to accept the responsibility.
2. But once they accept, in order to resign they must procedurally do so (maybe in
court)
B. There is no limit as to how many trustees you can have
1. trustee may be beneficiary, third party, and even the settlor
a. but he can’t be all three if he is the sole beneficiary, since he must be
accountable to someone
C. If settlor forgot to name a trustee (or if trustee dies), a court will appoint one.
1. The trust will not die for want of a trustee
2. Adams v. Adams: Husband set up house in trust for wife naming friend as trustee.
Trustee under duty to administer assets. Couple got divorced and husband
denied there was a trust and friend denied being the trustee.
a. In order to create a valid trust, you must deliver the assets to the trust.
(1) Though the friend never received the deed, the deed was recorded
which constitutes delivery of property to the trust.
b. The question remained if there was actually a trustee named?
(1) Ct didn’t care if friend didn’t want to be trustee.
(2) There were beneficiaries, there was intent, and there was a trust corpus.
Doesn’t matter if there is no trustee, the ct appointed one so it wouldn’t
fail and the wife can assert her right against the trust.
D. Must do the best for all beneficiaries involved
1. Trustee has to account for two types of beneficiaries:
a. Income Beneficiaries - those presently receiving the income from the assets
b. Remainder Beneficiaries - those who have a remainder interest and are not
currently receiving income, they get the assets in the future
E. Trustees cannot co-mingle trust property with their own
1. Must title assets separate from his or her personal assets.
2. Required to keep accurate accounts
F. Trustees owe a fiduciary duty to the “remainder beneficiaries” as well as any “life income
holders”
1. Subject to personal liability
2. The trustee owes the duty to generate a reasonable rate of return with the trust
“res”.
Page 84 of 111
a. Simply leaving money in account collecting 6% a year is NOT good enough.

b. A Passive or Dry trust is a trust in which the trustee owes no real duty to the
beneficiaries
(1) this trust will not be enforced.
3. Can not be involved in self-dealing. Self-Dealing is precluded. Self-Dealing occurs
when the trustee acts in a transaction wearing “both hats.”
a. Trustee is held to high standard of conduct, must handle matters solely for the
benefit of beneficiaries.
G. Generally, trustee cannot delegate management powers to other people
H. Trustees can be removed for improper actions.
1. Note: The Trustee’s personal debts can not be collected against the trust that he
or she manages.
I. SEE DUTIES OF TRUSTEES Infra.
9. BENEFICIARY
A. Person who owns Equitable Title (rights) to the property and benefits from the trust
B. Types of Benificiaries:
1. Two main types:
a. Income Beneficiaries (Equitable Present Interest in a Life Estate) – currently
receive a stream of income from trust assets
b. Remainder Beneficiaries (Equitable Future Interest) – currently receive nothing,
but they’ll get the remainder of the assets after they’re sold
(1) Revocable Trusts: Equitable Remainder Subject to Complete
Divestment
(2) Irrevocable Trusts: Equitable indefeasibly Vested Remainder
2. Successive beneficiaries – this is just a term referring to the two types and the way
the trust is set up. For example, usually a trust names a few for life who receive
income, maybe after that to another set for life, then another set, finally after
everybody named gets theirs, you distribute the principle and break up the trust.
3. Unborn or unascertained beneficiaries
a. Unborn persons MAY have a future right in a trust
(1) So long as the settlor is not the only other beneficiary; OR
(2) So long as settlor is not the sole trustee
(3) Example: O creates trust to benefit future kids, naming wife as trustee
 OK
(4) Ct will protect the interests of the unborn, because they cannot speak
for themselves
b. Unborn persons MAY NOT have a present right in a trust
(1) EXCEPTION: only if mother pregnant or if they are reasonably expected
to be
(2) Morsman v. Commissioner: Morsman transferred stock to a trust in
which he named himself as trustee, successor trustee, and a
beneficiary. On death his wife and kids would get remainder, but had no
wife or kids. He was to receive the income for life, but then sold stocks.
Gains were realized that should have been reported to the IRS.
(a) Trust will fail when the same person possess both the legal and
equitable title to the trust at the same time. (and no duties to
anyone else)
Page 85 of 111
i. Grantor may not be the trustee and beneficiary with other

people, when those other people do not exist.
(b) He argued that he expected to be married and have children
(c) ISSUE: Whether unborn children can be beneficiaries.
(d) held only if mother pregnant or if they she is reasonably expected
to be
i. Ct disagreed with him. He should have named a 3rd party
as a beneficiary to avoid problems then later amended the
trust (but he really couldn’t cause he wanted to screw the
IRS) The courts ruling prevents this behavior, thus he paid
the taxes.
c. Unborn children can be beneficiaries, so long as the same person is not a
beneficiary and a trustee.
d. You must be able to ascertain your beneficiaries.
e. Unascertained beneficiaries may have present and future right in a trust
(1) So long as they are identifiable
(a) Some groups are difficult to ascertain
f. Example: effect of Rule of Perpetuities on basic trust
(1) Oliver is settlor and transfers $100K in securities to a trust to A for life,
then to B for life, then principle to B’s children. If none living then back to
O.
(a) A has an equitable Life Estate;
(b) B has an equitable remainder interest in a Life Estate;
(c) B’s children have an equitable contingent remainder in Fee
Simple.
(d) O retains a reversion because Bob may not have any children.
C. Beneficiaries have standing to bring action for breach of trustee duties
1. Personal claims against trustee are allowed for breach of duty
a. But no greater
b. NOTE: Personal creditors of the trustee cannot reach trust property to collect
from the trustee because trust assets do not belong to the trustee personally,
he simply has legal title. Equitable title rests with the beneficiaries.
c. [MAY PERSONAL CREDITORS OF THE BENIFICIARIES REACH TRUST
PROPERTY IF THEY GET SUED (I.E. INCOME STREAM FROM INCOME
BENIFS AND ASSETS LATER FOR REMAINDER BENIFICIARIES]
2. If the trustee wrongfully disposes of property to Bona Fide Purchaser, beneficiaries
may make a bona fide claim to recover property
D. Difficulty in determining Beneficiaries will make a trust fail➾
1. Trustee cannot be the sole beneficiary
a. If the two were the same we would have a problem with “merger”.
(1) Example➾ Trustee = Bill; Beneficiary = Bill and Jane
(a) this is fine, they just can’t be identical.
2. Beneficiaries must be identifiable
a. example: On death of grantor $1,000.00 given to niece Brenda. Grantor has
two nieces named Brenda…this would fail since the proper beneficiary can not
be identified.
b. Clark v. Campbell – similarly a trust that names the beneficiaries simply as “my
friends” will not be enforced because there needs to be a sufficient language to
Page 86 of 111
dispose of assets. Court stated that the trust did not exist and will not be
enforced.
10. RES or CORPUS (Something of Value in Trust)
A. Something of value must be transferred into the trust:
1. Example: Even $1 is something of value that goes into the “res” of the trust.
a. §732.512(d) Because pour over can make the amount greater
b. ✘Assignment of any potential winnings (lottery) that you expect to get is not
sufficient.
2. EXCEPTION – Insurance Proceeds
a. Under §733.808, you can create a valid trust with no money in it, if you can
show that you will be transferring proceeds of an insurance policy into the “res”
(1) NOTE: §732.513 allows you to devise the insurance proceeds that get
transferred in to this nominally funded trust.
B. Must have intent to transfer the property.
1. Words used such as “beneficiary” or “trustee” are not conclusive that trust exists,
must look towards actions of the settlor to “transfer” the “res”.
2. Precatory Language: Language used by the settlor that implies a moral obligation
but is not binding upon the trustee.
a. “I hope” or “I wish” are non-binding precatory language.
(1) Instead use direct words like “shall” or “must”
(2) Example: “I leave all my jewelry to my daughter but, I hope that she
gives my diamond necklace to my granddaughter in her own will.”
(a) Daughter isn’t bound to pass it down to granddaughter because
precatory language was used to obligate her to do so.
3. Colton v. Colton: The day before he died, he wrote a trust. Court upheld the
creation of a trust that was written with the words “I recommend” and “I request”.
a. Court held, that viewing the case in the year in which the document was written
that such language was a “polite” way of directing someone to act. Year of
case was 1888.
11. §732.513 – Devises to Trustee
A. Valid devise may be made to a trustee if a trust is identified in the will and it is either:
1. in existence at the time of making the will; OR
2. signed at the time of making the will
B. §732.513(2) Devise will not be invalid if:
1. §732.513(2)(a) because it is amedable or revocable
2. §732.513(2)(b) because it has been amended or revoked in part after execution of
the will or codicil to it
3. §732.513(2)(c) because the trust wasn’t executed under same formalities of a will
4. §732.513(2)(d) because it has NO $$$, and the res has only expected insurance
proceeds
a. This subsection must be read together with §733.808 which allows a settlor to
create this unfunded trust
12. §737.111 – Execution Requirements for Express Trusts
A. Some trusts required to be in writing
1. which are those trusts that have a testamentary aspect
a. trusts that have effect upon your death
B. Trustee must owe equitable duties to someone more than himself (a beneficiary)
C. The trust should be signed in the same manner as a will.
Page 87 of 111
1. Example➾ Must have two witnesses, sign in each others presence, etc.
13. §733.808 – Death Benefits; Disposition of Proceeds
A. Death benefits of any kind, such as proceeds from:
1. individual or group life insurance policy;
2. pension plan, stock bonus, or profit sharing plan;
3. an annuity;
4. health and accident insurance policy;
B. May be made payable to the trustee under a trust agreement or declaraion of trust in
existence at time of death of the insured.
C. Benefits are disposed of by the trustee by the instructions in the trust
D. You can create a valid trust with no money in it, if you can show that you will be
transferring proceeds of an insurance policy into the “res”
E. NOTE: also mentions other stuff so refer to code
14. §737.108 – Revocable Trusts Prior to Dissolution of Marriage
A. If spouse is beneficiary, upon divorce, the rights of the spouse are nullified, unless the
document states otherwise
B. Applies only to revocable trusts
C. In Florida:
1. courts do not look at entire estate plan
2. courts do not look to intent, rather to instructions in trust
a. if absent instruction that says rights survive divorce, she’s gone!
D. This statute only affects spouse, does not affect family
E. [IS THIS ONLY WHEN LANGUAGE SAYS “TO MY SPOUSE?”, WHAT IF IT
SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIES HER “TO JILL ANTON, WHO’S MAIDEN NAME WAS JILL
SPILL”
15. Difference Between TRUST and WILL
A. Availability of Assets, Devises
1. In a will, when testator dies, there is a time lag while waiting for probate to
proceed, also it takes time to distribute the devises.
a. 6-8 months for a will.
2. A revocable trust is in the trustee’s hands, when trustee dies, assets immediately
become available to the beneficiaries
a. 4-6 weeks for trusts;
3. Ancillary Probate
a. Intervivos Revocable Trust – can also be used to avoid ancillary probate.
b. Example➾ Dane is a resident of Florida and has three properties in different
states. If rather than owning the property solely he transfers all those
properties to a trust…
(1) At death, he doesn’t own it but, the trust does – so no probate is
required.
B. Statute of Limitations
1. In a will, a creditor only has a certain amount of time (3 months) when they have to
make their claim after they are notified, after that the SOL runs on them and
they’re screwed.
2. In a trust, the SOL is not limited. The creditors may collect for a long time.
C. Public Record
1. A will is public record - In FL, inventory of assets can only be viewed by interested
parties
Page 88 of 111
2. A revocable trust is generally not recorded

a. Might have to be recorded under special circumstances (where powers are
concerned)
b. NOTE: if you want secrecy, a revocable trust is the way to go
D. Costs
1. A will that goes through probate may be very expensive, especially if challenged
(lawyers fees, court costs, etc.)
2. A trust avoids probate so much less expensive
3. You get marital deductions for a trust
E. Avoiding Contests
1. A revocable trust is harder to challenge than a will
F. Flexibility and Control
1. Trust is better than a will because trustee may be given greater responsibility for
upkeep of property and the property cannot be transferred.
2. Revocable trusts can be created inter vivos (while your alive) or upon your death
(testamentary trust) by stipulating it in your will
3. Revocable trusts are used for:
a. charitable purposes,
b. to control money during your lifetime or after your death,
c. tax purposes (generally used in estate planning to avoid estate taxes
4. trusts place restrictions against family members not allowed by wills
a. Allows you to manage great wealth for minors
5. A revocable trust gives you more control over who can be the trustee
G. Limits Liability
1. Trustee owns legal title to the property
2. Although trustee manages the trust, creditors may not reach trust assets for claims
against the trustee
16. Benefits of TRUSTS over LEGAL LIFE ESTATES
A. Legal Life Estate – where you transfer legal title to that person for life
1. With legal title, that person has possession and control over the property, including
management powers.
(1) To A for life, and remainder to A’s kids
B. Trust Beneficiary – Equitable title where there would be a beneficiary for life
(1) To X in trust for A for life, and remainder to A’s kids
C. Flexibility Disposing Property
1. Legal life tenant cannot sell property freely; they would have to go to court to have
that done. If buyer is lined up, he might not want to wait.
a. Trustee has power of sale, no court approval required, approval comes from
trust document
2. If legal life tenant wants to remove something from property (i.e. waste) like cutting
down timber, removing oil, etc. Remainders could bring injunction to stop them.
a. Trustee manages property for the good of the beneficiaries, outside of that, he
can do or get rid of anything within that duty.
D. Tax Consequences
1. Generally, purpose to set up either one, is to avoid taxes.
a. BUT, legal life tenant must include proceeds from sale as part of their estate,
so the’ll have to pay taxes on it, defeating the purpose.
E. Borrowing Money
Page 89 of 111
1. Legal life tenant cannot mortgage property on its own. Bank is not going to lend to
a legal life tenant. They are very unsecured because there are remainders that
have to agree as well. The remainders may refuse to agree and some may be
unascertainable.
a. Trustee has power to mortgage, no need to get anyone’s approval
F. Leasing
1. Legal life tenant may only lease property for a period not longer than his death.
a. Trustee manages lease under the trust so time runs until trust is dissolved.
G. Management Responsibilities
1. Legal life tenant has duty to pay taxes, keep property in repair, but only to the
extent of income generated from that property
a. Trustee obligated to that and much more, including insuring building, using
proceeds of other assets (if any) for repairs, etc.
b. Trustee does have to maintain certain accounting, the must do bookkeeping,
which makes it more expensive to have a trustee
H. Creditors
1. Legal life tenants’ property is within creditor’s reach to pay debts. They can put a
lien, foreclose, and sell it which will result in a loss (proceeds less than its worth
FMV), and remainders get much less than they should have.
a. Trustee may not necessarily be forced to sell property and can’t get to trustee
interests
Page 90 of 111
17. Trusts
A. Express Trusts
1. Are intentionally created by the settlor for the ongoing management of the trust
property.
2. Legal ownership is had by the trustee, and equitable ownership is had by the
beneficiary.
a. See supra….need “res”, etc.
B. Equitable Trusts (There are two kinds)
1. Generally, the court can create a resulting or constructive trust, by operation of
law, in certain situations, even when no trust existed between the parties.
2. Resulting Trusts:
a. Arises by Operation of Law; in 2 scenarios
(1) Where an express trust fails or makes an incomplete disposition; OR
(a) Note: Don’t necessarily need wrongdoing to form a resulting trust.
i. The same remedy works when that same attorney is killed
leaving the closing; see hypo #1 infra
(2) Where one person pays for property and the title is taken in another
person’s name who is not the natural object of the bounty of the
purchaser
(a) “natural object of the bounty” means person most likely who
would inherit from purchaser
(b) Hypo #1➾ O owns blackacre. A pays O 10K for blackacre.
Deed conveys blackacre to B
i. If B is not a natural object of A’s bounty (not a son or heir,
he’s just a 3rd person).
ii. Presumption arises that A did not have intent to give
property to B as a gift, but instead a trust is presumed to
exist.
a. To rebut presumption, B must offer evidence showing
otherwise; like A owed money to B
(c) Hypo #2➾ same facts as hypo 1
i. If B is a natural object of A’s bounty (his son or heir).
ii. Presumption arises that A did intent to give to B as a gift,
not a trust.
a. Burden switches to A who must prove a non-gift
through preponderance of the evidence
(d) Hypo #3➾ If Hypo 1facts were altered to the extent that the two
people were best friends for over 20 years - then B could argue
that he thought this was a gift.
b. Statute of Frauds: [ASK WHAT EFFECT DOES THE SOF HAVE ON
RESULTING TRUSTS??]
3. Constructive Trusts:
a. Arises by operation of law; not a written document
b. This is an equitable remedy to prevent unjust enrichment.
(1) The person found to be unjustly enriched, may be ordered under duty:
(a) to hold the property as trust for the benefit of the rightful owner or
(b) to deliver property back to rightful owner.
c. Terminology used:
Page 91 of 111
(1) When this remedy applies, equity creates his ______ interest (i.e.
beneficiary interest) into a legal interest of a trustee.
d. Four Requirements necessary to impose this:
(1) A confidential or fiduciary relationship between the parties involved
exists;
(a) Sometimes ct will look past this prong if it doesn’t exist
(2) One party expressly or impliedly promised to do something;
(3) One party transferred assets/property to another in reliance on that
promise.
(4) Transferee (title holder) would be unjustly enriched if property was
retained.
e. Example: A voluptuous tight young lady (cleaning girl) befriends an older man,
and she persuaded him to sign over all his property into her name. He’s got
boobies on the brain, and promises to do so. Courts here might create a
constructive trust for the old guy’s benefit.
f. Statute of Frauds doesn’t apply to constructive trusts – even if real estate was
the “res”
(1) Person v Pagnotta (inter vivos oral trust resulting in constructive trust)
(a) Woman who was dying transferred real estate to her friend, only
to be given to friend’s daughter after woman died. She got better
and wanted property back.
(b) She argued trust was invalid because it violates SOF. Ct
disagreed and looked to her intent, which they said was to create
an irrevocable trust. They applied and satisfied the constructive
trust test. Thus, they created a constructive trust where property
was held for daughter.
(2) HYPO: (oral trust transferring real estate resulting in constructive trust)
(a) O creates an oral trust and gives real estate to X (trustee) to hold
for A for life, then to B. O dies. Since it was not in writing,
violates SOF and therefore invalid. To prevent X from being
unjustly enriched by keeping property, court would likely create
constructive trust imputing X with trustee duty to hold for
beneficiaries. [WOULD A CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST BE
CREATED IF SETTLOR JUST DIED BEFORE PROBATE
PROCEEDINGS OR WOULD REAL ESTATE GO TO ESTATE
BENEFICIARIES]
g. You always want trusts conveying real property in writing. If not in writing, you
then have to go to court and try to get the court to impose a resulting or
constructive trust.
h. NOTE: Can be imposed on the killer of the decedent, for unjustly profiting from
the person’s death
C. Revocable Intervivos Trust
1. Created during the lifetime of the settlor.
2. Def: Settlor transfers assets to himself or another as trustee pursuant to a writing.
Settlor retains the right to amend the document and receive the income from the
trust.
a. Upon death, assets are given to beneficiaries or remain in trust.
Page 92 of 111
3. Note: By creating a trust such as this, you could prevent your spouse from
claiming an Elective Share or being declared a pre-termitted spouse.
4. Because the trust is revocable, criticism has been made the beneficiaries have no
real rights.
a. Court said no. Court said that as of the creation of such a trust, the
beneficiaries did have some rights to enforce the trustee to do a good job.
(1) Beneficiaries had the vested rights as of the day the trust was created.
(2) The fact that the grantor had the power to amend or revoke the trust or
that should the beneficiaries die, the grantor would retain all the money
does not defeat the fact that this type of trust is still….a TRUST.
18. Lapsing
A. The Court in Detroit Bank and Trust v. Grout held the following:
B. Person named in Trust account was not a relative of the grantor. The trust also stated
that if the beneficiary wasn’t alive when the grantor died, then the proceeds would go to
the heirs, assigns of that person.
1. The Beneficiary died before the grantor and the grantor’s family said that the gift
lapsed because the beneficiary wasn’t a relative of the grantor.
2. As a General Rule➾ When applied to trusts….a gift to a named beneficiary is
absolute and the gift should be delivered to the beneficiaries estate if they fail to
survive the grantor.
a. ✓Decedent’s intent is always paramount
In Florida, a beneficiaries interest in a trust, whether revocable or not, vests at the time of the
creation of the trust. Therefore, the anti-lapse statute does not apply. In the event that the
beneficiary predeceases the grantor, their heirs of the grantor will get the proceeds, unless the
trust states otherwise. In other words, a beneficiary predeceasing the grantor does not make
the gift lapse.
Page 93 of 111
CATEGORIES OF TRUSTS
1. Rights of trustees and beneficiaries, with respect to modification, administration, and

termination, depends on how you classify the trust.
2. There are 3 categories of trusts
A. Spend Thrift Trust
B. Support Trust
C. Discretionary Trust
3. SPEND THRIFT TRUST
A. Spend-Thrift applies to both the income and the principle.
B. §_______In Florida, these trusts are valid.
C. Designed to protect beneficiary from himself.
1. Under this trust, the beneficiary doesn’t have the right to spend the money, gift the
money, transfer the money, or otherwise control the money of this trust until he
has the money in his pocket.
a. Example: Aunt Amy sets up a $1,000,000.00 trust and puts a Spend-Thrift
clause in it. If the beneficiary goes out and buys a car and tells the dealer to
bill the trust, the trustee does not have to pay the bill.
2. Settlor of trust states:
a. Trustee is not required to pay the bills of the beneficiary;
b. Beneficiary may not go out and spend all this money.
D. Designed to protect assets against creditors.
1. creditors CAN NOT reach assets until the beneficiary has the money.
2. Broadway Bank v Adams (protect beneficiary from himself and creditors)
a. Testator died and created testamentary trust for his brother, A. Trust stated
that A could not assign the trust income and that it was to remain free of A’s
creditors. Thus he created a spend thrift trust.
b. A’s creditor argued that disabling restraints that restrict property transfers are
invalid. But this argument only works as to the person who has legal title (A
has equitable title until he actually received income). Since distribution of
income had not been made to A yet, creditor would have to wait until
distribution was made and under court order try to freeze the funds at that time
(but this is very difficult to do). If there hadn’t been a spendthrift provision, the
assets would have been transferable.
3. EXCEPTIONS – creditors may get beneficiary spendthrift interest only if:
a. Trust requires mandatory payment to the beneficiary to pay for stuff and also
states that beneficiary cannot assign trust assets.
(1) The mandatory payment beneficiary receives to spend (on food, shelter,
life necessities, etc) is accessible to creditors
b. In majority, to satisfy alimony/child support obligations
(1) Florida is in minority
(a) You cannot reach the spendthrift to satisfy these obligations
(b) EXCEPTION, you can once you’ve exhausted all other options
E. Settlor cannot create a revocable spendthrift trust for his own benefit as beneficiary [CAN
A SETTLOR CREATE AN IRREVOCABLE SPENDTHIFT TRUST FOR HIS OWN
BENEFIT]
1. In re Shirley
Page 94 of 111
a. You cannot create a trust of your own to alienate creditors. Here all assets
were put into a trust the Shirley benefited off of (BEFORE SHE WENT INTO
DEBT) This trust had both Discretionary and Spend Thrift provisions. Her
creditors wanted to take her spendthrift interest.
b. ISSUE: Can bankruptcy creditors take assets from spendthrift trust?
(1) Yes, because it’s not fair to create this trust, where you have control, to
avoid creditors.
(a) While a spend thrift generally protects a beneficiary from a
creditor this doesn’t work when assets were fraudulently left there
to hide from creditors.
c. If Court determines that creditors can reach the claims –how much can they
reach?
(1) Court looks towards whatever the maximum amount is that a trustee
could transfer to the beneficiary and that is what would be allowed to
creditors.
(a) It didn’t matter what she put in (¼), the trust assigned her ½,
creditors could also get that much.
4. DISCRETIONARY TRUST
A. The powers given to the trustee may be limitless (unlimited ways that this trust may be
drafted)
1. Trustee is given the right to:
a. decide which group of beneficiaries receive income or principal from the trust;
b. decide how much they get;
c. decide if they gat any at all or if the any income gets put back into the trust
corpus.
B. In order to ascertain the rights of the beneficiary, you must determine what the trust
allows the trustee to do:
1. First, look to language of trust document determine what powers are assigned to
trustee
a. Trustee may be given complete power or very limited power
b. If trustee has full discretion (over payment of income, percent, or both), the
beneficiary does not have the power to make trustee distribute what he has
power over
(1) which means creditors do not have the right to force distribution either
(2) Creditors cannot have more rights than a beneficiary (have same rights)
C. Generally, you are not going to be able to assign your interest
1. Its not that the assignment is void, but who will want to take the assignment when
the beneficiary doesn’t have control over the interest.
5. SUPPORT TRUST
A. Grantor places assets in a trust in support for the named beneficiary.
1. Support is either:
a. defined by the language in the trust, or
b. is for the necessities of life (care, maintenance, education, medical, or comfort)
(1) example: “When I die, I want there to be support for my son’s education”
(a) They will get money for tuition, books, room, etc.
c. Support may be for anyone.
B. Similar to discretionary trust, but beneficiary is limited to a certain amount of support
1. Trustee decides how much is necessary, which is the discretionary part
Page 95 of 111
a. There is a reasonable discretion standard

(1) Usually for maintaining a lifestyle, not necessarily a better lifestyle
(a) Trustee can not send you to Europe for 3 months since this is not
a necessity of life unless “support” is defined to include this.
b. Trustee who spends money unreasonably, may risk getting sued later on by
the beneficiary.
(1) Court will look at the beneficiaries own financial profile to see if support
is really needed.
C. Look to trust language to determine how much control the trustee and beneficiaries have
1. If drafting a discretionary support trust, you must state that trustee can only give
out money from the trust to each beneficiary only after the trustee considers what
other monies coming it to support each person. Then the support will go to each
beneficiary in so far as what they need.
a. This will prevent one very needy beneficiary from receiving the same as other
well off beneficiaries.
D. Rights of Creditors  Same rights as beneficiary
1. example: Trustee that is directed to pay for education can be sued by either the
school or beneficiary because school is for the support of the beneficiary and
creditors usually have the same rights as the beneficiary.
Page 96 of 111
REVOCATION AND TERMINATION OF TRUSTS
1. Revocation and Amendment of Trusts

A. Just as a will may be revoked or amended, so may a trust.
B. In General:
1. If a trust expressly states that it is revocable, then it may be changed;
a. Revocable trusts can be amended or terminated by the settlor, unless it says
otherwise.
2. If a trust expressly states that it is irrevocable, OR if it is silent on this issue, it can
not be revoked.
a. In Florida, irrevocable trusts cannot be altered.
b. EXCEPTION: Even if a trust is irrevocable it can be terminated if all the
beneficiaries consent.
(1) Problems arise because each beneficiary must consent, that means
vested and contingent beneficiaries.
(a) So if one is incompetent, a minor, unborn, then it remains
irrevocable for lack of consent
i. Need to appoint them guardians and then it may be
possible with judicial consent – but ct will apply material
purpose test [WILL THEY STILL APPLY TEST EVEN W/
GUARDIAN CONSENT cause kids could end up suing
later or are they precluded]
ii. §744.3021(1) Guardians of Minors have plenary
(complete) powers and thus could consent of minor’s
behalf
iii. Schmucker v Walker
a. Trust was to benefit the grandchildren per stirpes.
Trustee had full discretionary powers and wanted to
terminate.
b. NO, because there was an unfulfilled material purpose.
♦ The wife of the son was still living and had not
remarried (quite possible she could still have kids),
thus the future beneficiary class could not be
determined.
(b) For dead beneficiaries, majority holds trust cannot be terminated
prior to the time in the trust doc, even if all others consent, IF the
termination is contrary to a material purpose of the trust.
(2) Trustee does not have to consent because they do not have equitable
interest in the trust, they are only custodians of the trust.
(3) Settlor does not have to consent because once he’s given up his rights,
that it.
c. EXCEPTION to the EXCEPTION:
(1) Even if all beneficiaries consent, if it has a material purpose, it cannot be
terminated
(a) In reality, if the trustee, settlor, and beneficiaries agree to
terminate, no one is left to complain.
C. Material Purpose Trusts
Page 97 of 111
1. Generally, trusts may not be terminated if they are deemed to have a material
purpose.
a. Basically, a settlor intends to give the trust a material purpose and that’s what
determines the type of trust he creates, so in essence, the material purpose
test really looks at settlor’s intent.
2. 4 types of trusts deemed to have a material purpose:
a. Spendthrift
b. Support
c. Discretionary
d. Postponement of Enjoyment
(1) AKA: successive enjoyment trust
(2) example: To A for life, remainder to B
3. Beneficiaries cannot compel termination of material trusts
2. Early Termination
A. Assume trust with 3 beneficiaries (all of which are of age and are ascertained). All 3 want
their money now. The settlor hears this and is furious. Should the settlor have a say in
the matter?
1. Some Jurisdictions do not give him a say;
2. Others look at the settlor’s intent.
a. Generally➾ Majority states that an irrevocable trust can not be early
terminated, even if all interested beneficiaries consent, if termination would be
contrary to settlor’s material purpose.
(1) Material Purpose: Spend Thrift, Support, Discretionary, Age
requirements.
B. Example #1➾ Settlor transfers stock of $100,000 to trustee (the bank). Bank is
instructed to deliver income for life to A and the remainder to C per stirpes.
1. A becomes dissatisfied here thinking that he can make more money invested
differently. However, C wants the full $100,000.00 when A dies.
2. Bank can not early terminate this trust because C does not agree. We must look at
the rights of each party:
a. Settlor lacks standing because he retained no interest;
b. C has an equitable remainder so he can’t be compelled to settle for a portion of
the money.
c. Trustee owes a fiduciary duty to keep the trust and it’s assets intact. So if they
early terminate without C’s consent, they have breached this duty to C.
C. Example #2➾ Assume same facts as above, only this time C agrees to take $70,000 and
A will take $30,000.
1. In order to see if early termination applies, you must check everyone with standing
to object:
a. Settlor➾retained no interest so he has NO standing;
b. A➾has standing;
c. C➾has standing;
d. “Per Stirpes”➾those people need to agree, since they are not present in this
fact pattern, then A & C are still not allowed to terminate.
2. Note➾ When all interested parties agree to early termination, there is no one to
sue the trustee, so there is no point to keep the trust running.
a. When settlor leaves no interest – he can’t say anything.
Page 98 of 111
D. Example #3➾ Settlor transfers property to irrevocable trust with bank as trustee to pay
income to A for life, then to A’s children per stirpes.
1. At the present time, A is 45 and has two children both of which are 21.
2. Since A can have more children, not all potential beneficiaries are present except
for the two 21 year olds, these unborns could possibly sue bank later on for
terminating the trust early.
3. If settlor is alive and sees this going on – he could get and have a guardian
appointed to represent unascertained beneficiaries.
E. Example #4➾ Settlor transfers funds to bank as trustee in the following
manner….Income to A for life, then to B if B survives A.
1. Since there is a possibility that B may not survive A, the settlor has retained a
reversionary interest in the trust.
2. The settlor must thus be consulted with any attempt to early terminate the trust.
F. Example #5➾ Settlor transfers funds to bank as trustee….Income to A for life, principle
to B on A’s death. Settlor also creates a revocable trust.
1. May A and B agree to revoke?
a. NO. The Settlor rules the trust because it is revocable.
3. Partial Termination
A. Allowed in some jurisdictions
B. ORDER ON TEST – CAN TRUST BE TERMINATED
1st IS THIS A TESTAMENTARY (NEVER REVOCABLE) OR INTER VIVOS
TRUST?
2nd IF INTER VIVOS – IS IT REVOCABLE?
rd
3 IDENTIFY ALL PEOPLE
a. Do they have standing?
C. Example #1➾ Settlor irrevocably transfers to the bank as trustee to A for life, then to B.
If B doesn’t survive A then to B’s estate.
1. If both A and B agree to terminate but the settlor or the trustee is opposed to this,
A and B may be able to compel the trustee to terminate if the settlor did not
provide one of the four material purposes for a trust:
a. postponment;
b. spend-thrift;
c. support;
d. discretion.
D. Example #2➾ Settlor creates an irrevocable trust naming the bank as trustee. Bank is
ordered to pay (in it’s discretion) to A for life, then to B per stirpes.
1. If A & B agree to terminate – trustee is not able to terminate trust because there
was a material purpose to the trust…namely the support of A.
2. REMEMBER➾ it may be legally wrong to terminate the trust but, if no one with
standing would sue the bank for early termination, then the bank may agree to
terminate.
E. Example #3➾ Trustee is to pay income to A for life but, if A gets to the age of 35 then
give all money to A. If he dies before 35, then to his estate.
1. At 25 yrs old, assume that A assigns his rights to X (a complete stranger). Court
said that X can not compel trustee to terminate because the purpose here was to
A for life…not to X.
a. Court said that you can not circumvent an issue by transferring.
Page 99 of 111
F. Remember:
1. Parties may even agree to amend a trust.
2. Wherever a settlor leaves a right to revoke, he has a say in its amendment.
4. Administrative Deviation
A. If the trust becomes SUBSTANTIALLY or SERIOUSLY threatened by some outside
source, the Court may allow an administrative change to the document to keep it going.
1. An administrative provision is one that sets rules for the trustees (tells them what
to do).
a. example: saying the trustee must invest in a certain asset (or refrain from doing
so)
2. example: At the time it was created, the terms could have made sense, but years
later they may be harmful to the trust to make it no longer viable. The ct, after a
motion, can order trustee to ignore those provisions, or amend them
a. Court will not allow administrative deviation just because trustee doesn’t like
provision or because he thinks he can earn interest in another way – must be
SERIOUS THREAT
B. Matter of Pulitzer
1. Court allowed an administrative change to the trust to prevent a serious
destruction of the trust. Trust originally specified that trust finds could only be
invested in government bonds. The trust was written many years ago when the
bonds yielded a high rate – they were extremely low now and court said it posed a
serious threat to the existence of the trust.
a. NOTE: Other government bonds may not have been a SERIOUS threat – If
that was the case then there will not be an administrative change allowed.
C. §737.402(3) When Trustee can terminate early
1. If trust goes under $50,000, trustee has sole discretion to terminate the trust
a. But if there is no threat that if it drops below $50K it will substantially impair its
purpose, then you cannot deviate from the administrative provisions (of what
trustee must do)
2. REMEMBER: a trustee only has a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries. [OR IS IT TO
ALL THE PARTIES???]
Page 100 of 111

CHARITABLE TRUSTS & CY PRES DOCTRINE
1. Charitable Trusts
A. Generally, encompasses all trusts where the settlor gave assets and income and
principle to a charity organization.
1. special rules apply(differ from express trusts) because they’re set up for benefit of
society
a. They are liberally construed
b. Once a charitable trust is created, the settlor does not have an interest in the
trust, he becomes part of society, so he has no standing to the trust.
B. ORDER ON TEST – IS IT A CHARITABLE TRUST or private trust?
1. To qualify as a charitable trust:
a. Must have indefinite beneficiaries, OR
(1) example: “For the benefit of all the poor people of Kentucky”
(2) Its not the quantity of the people, its what the money does for the
community.
(a) If only helping 3 out of 300, it is still benefiting community
b. Must be in favor of a reasonably large class of beneficiaries AND
(1) example: “For the benefit of a the Denver Zoo”
(2) Cannot be for specific identifiable beneficiaries
(a) example: “Trust to M for life, remainder to son” (private trust)
c. Must have a Charitable Purpose
(1) example: “trust for his age women who want to go to special school in
NY”
(a) Trust for lobbying is not a charitable purpose
C. Rule Against Perpetuities
1. RAP doesn’t apply to only charitable trusts because they have a perpetual
existence
a. NOTE: applies to private trusts
2. Often, a trust may have charitable and private interests, in this case you MUST
apply RAP
2. Cy Pres Doctrine
A. Means “as near as possible”
B. Applies when things become impossible, illegal, or impractical to perform
1. It’s applied to charitable trusts when:
a. A specific charity, for which the settlor created the trust, goes out of existence
b. It’s charitable purpose changed
c. It’s name changed
d. Some significant characteristic changed
2. Rather than returning funds to settlor, Under the Doctrine of Cy Pres, Ct may
redirect the benefits of the trust to a purpose as near as possible to the original
intention
a. example: Ct can order benefit to continue for the Bronx Zoo, if the other zoo
closes
C. Doctrine will generally apply unless settlor specified otherwise
1. Sometimes an alternative beneficiary is named
Page 101 of 111

D. Cy pres is necessary because the settlor had a general charitable intent - and that intent
is reflected in setting up the actual trust document - the court is basically trying to fulfill
that intent
1. Court will ask when determining whether to apply Cy Pres:
a. Was there an alternative beneficiary?
b. What was the general intent of the charitable trust? –
2. If settlor wanted trust to fail, if couldn’t go to anything except the organization
named - then the trust fails.
a. If person had general intentions of giving to anyone - court will not allow the
trust to fail
3. HYPO: (Impractical)
a. Children’s wing for orthopedic problems - hospital gets the money, but it is not
enough, and they have no other means of getting the rest of the money. You
have to look to settlor’s general intent and purpose. What would the settlor
have done if he knew that the wing could not be built? Maybe rather than
building a new wing - they can give it to another children’s hospital for
orthopedic care.
E. Estate of Buck
1. Trust principle increased incredibly. There was way to much money to use for the
purpose of the trust. They could not spend 30 million dollars. Under cy pres the
beneficiary wants to give some of the money to another charity.
2. Cy Pres did not apply because it’s purpose could still be carried out. Although the
trust was administratively inefficient, efficiency and effectiveness are not the
doctrine’s guidelines.
3. Has to be impractical, impossible, or illegal.
Page 102 of 111

RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES
1. NOTE: MAYBE ONE OR TWO QUESTIONS ON EXAM - MULTIPLE CHOICE

2. The Rule Against Perpetuities – Doesn’t want “Dead Hand Control”. Developed to stop
people from controlling property for too long after they have died.
A. You can ONLY control property:
1. During your life; or
2. During the life in being’s life; or
3. 21 years after the life in being’s life
4. Any longer and you’ll violate RAP
B. “Life in Being” – probably the grantor/settlor that is alive, beneficiaries may be lives in
being also without violating the rule
1. Usually family, could be one-intervening generation (like someone’s children)
C. NOTE: A trust is not void simply because it extends beyond the perpetuities period, it just
limits the duration of the trust
D. §689.225 Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities
1. Even if interest violates RAP – more than 21 years
2. IN FLORIDA, as long as the interest vests within 90 years, it won’t violate RAP
E. ORDER ON TEST:
1. STEP ONE: Who are the lives in being?
2. STEP TWO: Ask when was the interest created?
a. Trusts➾ At the time that the trust document is signed;
b. Testamentary Trust➾ At the time of death;
c. Irrevocable Intervivos ➾ At the time its signed
d. Revocable Trust➾ At the time the trust no longer is revocable (usually when
settlor becomes incompetent or dies);
3. STEP THREE: When does that interest vest?
4. STEP FOUR: In whom does that vulnerable interest vest?
a. Ask: “IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR vulnerable interest to vest MORE THAN 21
YEARS AFTER validating life ‘S DEATH?”
(1) The validating lives to be tested are:
(a) The Grantor first (only if alive);
(b) Test Purchasers in order that they appear in conveyance (Can’t
test a class if it’s not closed);
(c) Test interveening generations;
(d) Test anyone else mentioned in the conveyance that hasn’t
already been tested.
(2) If you can’t make at least one sentence true, you must strike that
conveyance.
5. STEP FIVE: Is it an interest that is subject to or excluded from RAP?
a. RAP applies to 3 types of interests (3 vulnerable interests):
(1) All Executory Interests – These VEST when the CONDITION IS MET.
(a) It becomes possessory at that time (because interest transfers
from one to another)
i. example: O to A, for use of a residence, but if ever used
for a business, then to B. From the moment it is ever used
Page 103 of 111

as a business - it goes to B - the interest transfers

immediately to B.
(2) All Contingent Remainders –VESTS the moment when the CONDITION
THAT MAKES IT CONTINGENT DISAPPEARS
(a) no matter if it makes it possessory at that time, you may not have
actual property in hand yet, but it can still vest in you
i. example: To A for life, and if B goes to law school, to B -
There is a condition precedent - graduate from law school
- contingent remainder in B vests when B graduates from
law school
(3) Vested Remainders Subject to Open – These VEST when it vests in
some people, BUT OTHERS IN THE CLASS COULD STILL GET IT
(a) Ways for the class to close:
i. Ascending generation dies; or
ii. A dies w/o kids and leaves gift to his children (physically
impossible for him to have more kids.
iii. When time of possession has arrived and at least one
member is able to take.
iv. example: Class Gifts OR To A for life, then to A’s children.
A may have more children. Class is subject to being open -
she could have more children
b. If one of these interest exists then it violates RAP – and interest becomes void
- it will then go to others who would get it absent that invalid provision
F. Definition:
1. No future interest is good - [look at type of interest]
2. unless it must vest in all people it could vest in, if at all - [does it vest or fail?]
3. not later than 21 years after some life in being (plus any relevant gestational
period) - [perpetuities period]
4. at the time of the creation of the interest - [death or creation of trust]
G. Rule against Perp. applies to Equitable and Legal Interest and to Personal and Real
Property.
H. The Savings Clause
1. Attorney’s use this to make sure that interest vests and does not violate the rule
against perpetuities.
a. ”Any interest that violates the Rule against Perpetuities was inadvertent and if
so, cut off gift after 21 years and give to previous individual.”
The lives in being that can be used to overcome RAP (lives in beings):
The grantor
The beneficiaries
Person related by blood or adoption to the transferor or beneficiary
Person closely related to the transaction
People in the transaction, or intervening generations.
Page 104 of 111

FIDUCIARY ADMINISTRATION
1. Fiduciary Administration
A. §518.10 Defines “Fiduciary”
1. An executor (personal representative), administrator, trustee, guardian, or other
, whether individual or corporate, who by some writing or document has the
responsibility of buying, selling, investing, or managing assets of another.
B. Personal Representatives (executors) of estates
1. What are their major duties?
a. To search for and gather all of the decedents probate assets
(1) in gathering probate assets:
(a) gather all assets though all might not come in
(b) gather future assets
(c) gather assets that because of undue influence may come back
into the estate
b. pay estate and income taxes of the estate
c. pay liabilities (i.e. mortgage)
d. duty to distribute remaining assets to beneficiaries or heirs
2. Doesn’t have much of an investment duty
a. unless at time estate is open, there is property that needs maintaining
b. only has duty to maintain until the time estate is filed and distributed
3. Does that person have time to serve as PR?
a. if not, don’t do it.
b. If not positive, leave a successor to PR
C. Trustees of Estates
1. Powers – trustee cant exercise a power if it will violate one of their trustee duties
a. Trustees cannot go beyond their powers
b. What are the 4 sources that give them the power
(1) Trust document language
(a) can limit or expand the powers of the other sources
(b) §737.401 Powers of trustees Conferred By Trust or by Law
i. States that unless trust document says otherwise, trustee
has the powers under §737.402
a. Meaning, when trust doc says nothing, then look to
737.402
(2) State statutes
(a) §737.402 – FL gives an extensive grant of administrative powers
(long list)
i. gives power to administrate estate
ii. §737.402(2)(h) gives power to sell assets for cash
iii. §737.402(2)(k) gives power to enter into a lease
(b) If you want to give trustee all the powers, copy the exact
language that’s given in the statute
i. example: If settlor didn’t die in FL but wanted FL law to
govern:
a. Must enumerate those powers and copy the language
(3) Common law (implied powers)
Page 105 of 111

(4) Court orders

2. Duties – found in restatement of law and statutes
a. §737.301 general duties of trustee
(1) General duty to administer the trust diligently for the benefit of the
beneficiaries
(2) Also says other statutes don’t limit these duties
b. 7 specific duties
(1) Duty to keep trust assets separate
(a) comes from restatement
(b) Keep trust assets separate from own assets, CANNOT CO-
MINGLE
i. When they comingle, remedies are:
a. if commingled property is lost or destroyed, it is
presumed that property lost or destroyed belongs to the
beneficiaries
♦ trustee takes the loss
b. If commingled property, where some assets rise and
others decline
♦ The rise is attributed to the beneficiaries, the trustee
as an individual will take the loss
(c) Can trustees commingle trust assets with other trust assets?
i. Generally you cannot
a. In FL there are exceptions
♦ A trust company can commingle one trust’s assets
with other trusts assets through a common trust
fund, unless the trust document limits this so always
look to the doc
(2) Duty to exercise reasonable care and skill
(a) §737.302 Where the trustee does something not prohibited by the
trust, trustee must exercise skill and prudence as any ordinary,
reasonable, careful person would you in carrying on his own
personal affair.
i. §737.302 BUT if trustee possesses special skill greater
than any ordinary normal person, they are held to a higher
standard in using that skill, liable for loss that results in a
failure to make use of that greater skill
ii. §518.112 If a corporation, professional trustee, or normal
trustee that has special investment facilities to manage the
trust, either expressly or impliedly, they are liable for loss
that results in a failure to make use of that greater skill
(b) example: If trustee is a school teacher, she will be held to the
standard of a reasonable person of ordinary produce investing
their own money however, if the trustee is the Bloomigton trust
co. they will be held as trust investers (higher standard)
(3) Duty to control and preserve trust property and to make it productive
(a) In order for duty to be effective, trustee must have power to do
something about it
Page 106 of 111

i. §737.402 states certain enumerated powers that help

trustee fulfill that duty
a. §737.402(2)(i) gives power to make repairs
b. §737.402(2)(r) gives power to take out insurance to
protect property
c. §737.402(2)(r) gives power to employ lawyers,
investment advisers, etc. to advise or assist the trustee
(4) Duty to deal impartially with all beneficiaries
(a) REMEMBER: §737.301, gives general duty to administer trust to
all beneficiaries (2 types)
i. Income beneficiaries - they get income for life
a. They want more investment risk to get greater income
ii. Remainder beneficiaries - they get principal (assets when
trust ends)
a. They want long term conservative investments for
capital appreciation
(b) Trustee has duty to remain impartial to both groups
i. Goes to investing for both impartially
(c) Dennis v Rhode Island Hospital
i. Trust had 3 buildings built in 1800s, trust created in 1920
when buildings worth 300K
ii. Trustee was authorized by trust doc to sell buildings at any
time; he sold them for 185K
iii. Remainder beneficiaries sued trustee for not fulfilling duty
to deal impartially. The income beneficiaries didn’t sue
because they got the income from the sale. Ct said he
owes duty to both, but he milked the income by renting the
buildings for years while the property value was declining,
so he was fulfilling his duty by giving income beneficiaries
a stream, but he didn’t preserve the property (let it turn to
shit) so he failed to fulfill duty of impartiality to remainder
benefs. If he sold the buildings immediately, he would
have cut out the income benefs, so he must balance
between both.
(5) Duty to personally participate and not delegate
(a) In Florida, What functions may be delegated?
i. Ministerial functions you may delegate
a. Sending and writing letters, copying etc.
ii. Administrative functions, generally, may not be delegated
a. These are dispositive/distributive functions
♦ who gets what, when do they get it, etc.
b. EXCEPTION: §518.11 You may delegate, under
certain circumstances, part or all, of your investment
function
♦ See below Delegating Investment Functions
(b) §518.11(1)(a) gives fiduciary a duty to invest and manage
investment assets but he is subject to a rule that has 2 standards:
Page 107 of 111

i. Prudent Investor Rule (1st standard)

a. Fiduciary has duty to exercise reasonable care in
making or managing investments as an ordinary careful
prudent investor would make of his own property,
having in view the preservation of the estate, and the
amount and regularity of the income to be arrived.
b. Meaning, trustee must evaluate the propriety of each
individual investment (in disposing of the estate)
♦ NOTE: Traditionally, this was the only standard
applied which by itself doesn’t allow for much
flexibility.
ii. Modern Portfolio Theory (2nd standard)
a. This standard requires the same exercise of
reasonable care and caution but it must also be applied
in view of the investment portfolio as a whole, not just
to each isolated investment.
iii. General effect of both standards:
a. Trustee still has a duty of reasonable care as an
ordinary prudent investor to look at each investment
individually, but he must also consider them all together
(c) Delegating investment functions:
i. Primary function of Trustee: management and growth of
trust funds and assets.
a. This responsibility can not be given ultimately to others
– although he can get assistance.
b. Trustee can not accept this advice blindly – he has the
final decision.
♦ NOTE: If you hire a bank or a trust company to
manage a trust they can not hire people using trust
funds when they are supposed to be the expert in
that field.
ii. §518.11 2 says trustees may delegate part or all of the
investment function, that a prudent investor of comparable
skills might delegate under the circumstances to an
investment manager
a. Under restatement 3rd, it might be a breach if trustee
fails, under some circumstances, to get advise of
investment manager
iii. When a fiduciary delegates investment functions, he has a
duty to exercise reasonable care in:
a. Selecting an investment manager; and
b. Establishing scope and specific terms of delegation;
and
c. In reviewing and supervising the agent’s actions
iv. However, trustee is ultimately responsible because he was
the one who hired these plumbers, etc.
v. The expenses that trustee has to pay for these experts
comes out of the trust.
Page 108 of 111

(d) §518.11(1)(b) This rule is a test of conduct and not of

performance.
i. Meaning some losses are expected, ct won’t judge on this
measure, ct will judge on process you went through in
looking at investments.
a. Specifically, trustee will be judged on his reasonable
business judgment regarding the anticipated effect of
each investment on the investment portfolio as a whole
under the circumstances prevailing at that time.
ii. First Alabama Bank v Martin (pg 1242)
a. Case dealt with class action suit where 1250 individual
trust funds had losses (some in securities, some in real
estate). Expert witnesses were brought in to testify as
to what investments should have been made.
b. Ct applied the combined modern standard of prudent
investor rule and portfolio theory. Looked at whether
all investments were considered individually and as a
whole.
c. Bank had a well-balanced portfolio of blue chips that
they invested everybody’s funds in, so as a whole it
looked ok. But the bank did not look at each and every
individual investment.
♦ Thus, they failed to meet the combined standard.
♦ If trustee does not pass both hurdles, then it is a
breach and can be surcharged (holding fiduciary
personally liable for breach and charging them as
individuals)
(e) §518.112 Imposes liability on a trustee for loss that results in a
failure to meet the combined standard of care
(6) Duty to render accounts to the beneficiaries AND enforce claims AND
defend actions AND also follow the terms of the trust
(a) Duty to maintain detailed accountings
i. Must show in detail the name of assets and their value
(b) §737.303(4) Gives a right to these annual accountings to:
i. §737.303(4)(b)(1) current income beneficiaries;
ii. §737.303(4)(b)(1) principal beneficiaries;
iii. §737.303(4)(b)(2) remainder beneficiaries that are
ascertainable (this doesn’t include those not alive yet)
iv. §737.303(4)(d) A beneficiary may waive, in writing,
trustees duty to provide him with accountings
v. §737.303(4)(e) All rights provided to beneficiaries may be
asserted by a legal representative or natural guardian of
the beneficiary
(c) §737.3054(4) Duty to pay the expenses of trust administration,
including enforcing claims and defending actions against the trust
estate.
(d) Trustee has absolute duty to follow terms of the trust
Page 109 of 111

i. Terms of trust document trump what the statutes require

ii. Case
a. Trust named PR as trustees of his trust. The language
said they had duty to take the securities that were not
legal investments for fiduciaries, and convert them into
legal securities and from the income that was
generated, pay some of the beneficiaries.
b. Because the securities were falling in value, the
PR/trustees didn’t convert them, the beneficiaries sued.
c. At that time, trustees good faith defense was that there
was a law that said they could keep the securities w/o
converting them.
d. Ct went back to language of trust doc which controls,
and said they had an absolute duty to do as the trust
doc said.
(7) Duty of loyalty
(a) §737.306(b) Makes trustees personally liable for:
i. breach of duty; OR
ii. torts committed in course of administration of trusts estate
BUT only if trustee is personally at fault
(b) Self Dealing is a breach of duty!
i. Generally, trustees are prohibited from self dealing
because beneficiaries are intended to benefit from trust,
not the trustee.
ii. Cannot use innocence/negligence as a defense for self
dealing
a. Good faith, Fairness is not relevant here
iii. EXCEPTION: if ALL beneficiaries consent to trustee’s self-
dealing act that would generally cause a breach
a. However, ct may still say it looks fishy and find a
breach
(c) Self dealing which trustees are prohibited from:
i. Cannot borrow from the trust
ii. Cannot sell his own property to the trust
iii. Cannot take out personal loan against the trust
iv. Cannot offset the losses with the gains
a. No Offsetting Rule (aka Anti-netting Rule)
♦ Prohibits a trustee from offsetting his liability from
loss of an improper investment (caused by breach)
from a gain from another improper investment
(caused by breach).
♦ Example: Trustee bought 2 stocks improperly.
Bought stock A for 10K and sold at 6K, bought
stock B for 10K and sold for 12K, so total liability of
2K. But you can’t offset, so liability is greater cause
you’ve breached twice.
(d) No Further Inquiry Rule applies when trustee is involved in self
dealing.
Page 110 of 111

i. Meaning, when trustee buys something or sells something

to trust estate, that is enough to impose liability, no further
inquiry is required by the courts because this is a per se
violation
a. Since it is a per se violation, beneficiaries may
surcharge trust (charging the trustee) because strict
liability will be applied
ii. Prevents fraud by keeping everything at arms-length
a. Just keep in mind that some believe social investing is
actually a breach of loyalty [DON’T KNOW WHAT
SOCIAL DEALING IS].
iii. National City Bank v Farmers Loan & Trust Co
a. Prior to 1929, Settlor created revocable trust where she
named Farmers Loan as trustee. Assets of trust were
stock of National City bank. Later, Farmers merged
with National City. Trust doc said trustee may hold the
stocks as long as reasonable?? Settlor even
consented to having Farmers hold stocks until after
they merged.
b. Ct held it was self dealing, since they were now
merged, they were prohibited from holding their own
stock.
c. But ct said they weren’t liable for loss of value because
she still had the power to revoke.
d. NOTE: Generally, self dealing is a charge that allows
for loss of value when irrevocable.
e. Here, Ct said even though the Bank acted in good faith
(cause if they tried to sell their own stock the FMV of
the stock would crash the market) they violated a per
se no further inquiry rule.
Page 111 of 111

Wills and Trusts - RodDod

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Wills and Trusts - RodDod

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Wills & Trusts Outline

Rodriguez-Dod [Spring 2000] K. McMahan

1. Key Terms §731.201

PROBATE PROPERTY AND PROBATE PROCEEDINGS

1. The Probate Proceeding➾

i. Collateral Attacks are not allowed outside of the Probate

2. What is Probate Property?

c. Money in a client trust account is NOT probate property

3. What is NOT Probate Property?

a. Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship; or

Probate Assets ( Generally)

1) All assets solely owned by the decedent

TAX CONSEQUENCES OF DEVISING PROPERTY

1. THIS IS NOT FROM ROD-DOD’S CLASS, THIS IS INTERESTING INFO I WANTED TO

a. Lineal Descendents: Individuals related to the decedent by blood but born

5. §732.107 – Escheat (State’s Share)

a. However this exception ONLY applies to children of the decedent.

8. §732.601 - Simultaneous Death Act–

(1) William: according to §732.601(2) we must divide the property into as

LOSS OF RIGHTS TO AN INTESTATE SHARE

(b) does so in the presence of the testator.

b. Two Witnesses must be in the presence of testator that can attest to

(b) incapable of understanding

3. OTHER TYPES OF WILLS

4. §732.502(2) Non-Residence Wills

REVOCATION OR AMENDMENT OF WILLS/CODICILS

10. §733.207 – Establishment and Probate of Lost or Destroyed Will

B. §732.512(2) ( Acts of Independent Legal Significance ) A will may dispose of property by

RIGHT TO ELECTIVE SHARE

6. §732.205 Elective Share Restricted to FL Resident Decedent

9. §732.2125 Right of Election; by whom exercisable [STANDING] (Formerly §732.210)

b. §732.2075(1)(b) take proceeds from retirement plan of decedent

17. Example of a difficulty in paying the Elective Share

Comparison of old to new statutes in elective share:

PROTECTIONS GIVEN TO SPOUSE AND FAMILY

1. §732.402 - Exempt Property

2. §732.403 - Family Allowance

1. Purpose of the Homestead probate exemption is to promote stability. It prevents creditors

a. Office room or rented room in house.

More In-class examples (from questions above):

1. Will Contests take two forms:

5. Presumption/ Standing to Contest

GROUNDS TO CONTEST A WILL

6. §732.5165 – Effect of Fraud, Duress, Mistake and Undue Influence

(c) What was person’s mental state;

LACK OF TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY

5. Testamentary Capacity is not defined in the Statutes, only by Case Law.

13. MALICIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH INHERITANCE

1. Ademption: Revocation or taking away of a legacy by an act of the testator.

a. Money left in bank account #1234

1. Meaning, your gift is erased because I delivered or satisfied it during my lifetime.

13. §733.803 - Exoneration

A. Difference between the two is that with

(1) Example: Four people in a class: A,B,C,D; When A dies…lapse statute

ABATEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION

SIMULTANEOUS DEATH AND SURVIVORSHIP

KILLER FORFEITURE STATUTE

DOCUMENTS RELATED TO WILLS

1. §709.08 Durable Power of Attorney

b. When principal while alive and competent revokes it;

2. Health Care Advance Directives

B. §765.304 - Living Will

1. Why People Set Up Trusts: