Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Analysis?
Methods@Manchester
Dr Vanessa May
Realities (Part of the ESRC National Centre for Research
Methods)
and
Morgan Centre for the Study of Relationships and Personal
Life
Today’s talk
• When you want someone to know who you are, what do you do?
• When you experience anything, how do you make sense of it?
• How do you communicate your experiences to another person?
• Interdisciplinary by nature…
• …and therefore not a single uniform method but rather an umbrella
term for an eclectic mix of methodological approaches…
• …informed by numerous theoretical orientations (e.g. hermeneutics,
existentialism, phenomenology and interactionism)
• Utilised by researchers in a variety of disciplines: sociology, psychology,
political science, anthropology, education, health, …
• Characters
• Main characters: Villain: Breast Cancer (dangerous, deadly, but also
susceptible to medical treatment); Hero: The Doctor (competent,
knowledgeable, the expert); Heroine: The Patient (fearful, strong,
willing to fight); Helpers: Treatment, Medical Technology (can see into
the patient’s body, finds, fights and destroys the cancer)
• Supporting characters: The Body; Patient’s Partner; Family; Friends;
Volunteer workers; Health Care Team; Pain -- ‘The cancer patient is
surrounded by a group of caring, helpful others; people at work; and
loving friends and relatives.’ (Davis, 2008: 70)
• What people do with narrative and how narratives are used to accomplish
certain ends
• e.g. constructing an identity, persuading the listener/audience of
something (e.g., May, 2008)
• Presser’s analysis was a mixture of both holistic and thematic, and focused
on both content and form
• Cross-sectional and holistic analyses of the cases
• Beginning from the ‘what’ and then shifting to an examination of the
‘how’ of talk
• The men’s narratives did not constitute ‘the authentic story of the narrator
– none exists’; rather, the accounts were co-constructed, influenced by
the relations between Presser and her research participants (Presser,
2005: 2087)
• Presser examines her own role as a collaborator in the men’s narratives –
the accounts they provide are a ‘situated, collaborative negotiation of
narrated identities’ (Presser, 2005: 2070)
• Both Presser and the men she interviewed were using ‘their gender
relations with each other to affirm an appropriately gendered self’
(Presser, 2005: 2073)
• In enacting their ‘decent selves’ to her, the men she interviewed were also
positioning her as a heterosexual woman
• e.g. ‘chivalrous masculinity’ such as offering Presser advice on men
was a popular way of ‘doing’ gender in all the interviews
• ‘Such chivalry positions the female other in terms of hegemonic
femininity, encompassing vulnerability and heterosexuality’, but the
darker side of such chivalry is ‘its assertion of authority’ (Presser,
2005: 2079)
• Andrews, Molly (2002) ‘Introduction: Counter-narratives and the power to oppose’, Narrative
Inquiry, 12: 1-6.
• Andrews, Molly, Squire, Corinne & Tamboukou, Maria (eds) (2008) Doing Narrative Research,
London: Sage.
• Conway, Daniel (2008) ‘Masculinities and narrating the past: Experiences of researching white men
who refused to serve in the apartheid army’, Qualitative Research, 8(3): 347-354.
• Davis, Elizabeth M. (2008) ‘Risky business: Medical discourse, breast cancer, and narrative’,
Qualitative Health Research, 18(1): 65-76.
• De Fina, Anna & Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2008) ‘Analysing narratives as practices’, Qualitative
Research, 8(3): 379-387.
• Foucault, Michel (1980) ‘Truth and power: An interview’, in Gordon, Colin (ed.) Power/Knowledge:
Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Lawler, Steph (2002) ‘Narrative in social research’, in May, Tim (ed.) Qualitative Research in
Action, London: Sage. (pp.242-258).
• Lieblich, Amia, Tuval-Maschiach, Rivka & Zilber, Tamar (1998) Narrative Research: Reading,
Analysis, and Interpretation, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• May, Vanessa (2004) ‘Narrative identity and the re-conceptualization of lone motherhood’,
Narrative Inquiry, 14: 169-189.
• May, Vanessa (2008) ‘On being a ‘good’ mother: The moral presentation of self’, Sociology, 42:
470–486.
• McBeth, Mark K., Shanahan, Elizabeth A. & Jones, Michael D. (2005) ’The science of storytelling:
Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone’, Society & Natural Resources, 18(5): 413-429