Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
E N V I R O N M E N T A L ECONOMIC BENEFITS
A POSITIVE IMAGE
The largest obst acles to green
LAND/SITE Sustainability can be a strong construction are perceived higher
Carefully planning a building’s position marketing advantage. The positive construction costs (by 70 percent of all
as it relates to exposure to sun and image created by going green can executives), a general lack of awareness
wind and other aspects of the terrain help attract and retain employees, of the benefits (by 63 percent) and short-
can profoundly affect it’s reliance on tenants, clients and suppliers. term budget horizons (53 percent).
mechanical heating/cooling and artificial Sustainability also ensures that Recent studies have shown construction
lighting. This can result in significant the company or owner is “future of LEED® certified buildings to be cost
operating cost savings. proofed” against new regulations neutral, with a premium of about 2
or higher standards concerning percent for LEED® Silver buildings and
INDOOR AIR QUALITY environmental impacts of buildings between 6 and 8 percent for LEED®
or operations. Gold and Platinum rated buildings.
Healthier and more pleasant working
conditions boost productivity and job However, taking into account lower
satisfaction. Air quality plays a major energy and water bills, the net value
S O C I A L B E N E F I T S of green buildings results in an average
role. Some green systems are actually
less expensive to install than conventional In 2004, Turner Construction surveyed payback (or return on investment) of
systems because they reduce the need over 80 0 green building owners, about ten times the average cost of
for overhead ducting and demand loads developers, architects, engineers and building it. (Kats, G., Green Building
required on HVAC equipment. consultants. The survey looked at seven Costs and Financial Benefits, 2003)
categories of “benefits” related to green
ATMOSPHERE buildings. According to the survey, the
Buildings are responsible for about 30 most highly perceived benefits were: PRODUCTIVITY AT WORK
percent of greenhouse gas emissions. Pennsylvania Power and Light
Green buildings are designed with Greater health and well-being of
found that conversion from
operational efficiency to reduce these occupants (86%)
general to high-efficiency task
emissions. Higher building value (79%) lighting reduced lighting costs by
Higher worker productivity (76%) 69 percent and annual operating
ENERGY costs by 73 percent, attributed
Higher return on investment (63%)
Green buildings use about one-third less to reduced absenteeism and
energy than conventional structures. Higher asking rents (62%) higher productivity. The payback
Higher occupancy rates (52%) for electricity changes alone
MATERIALS & WASTE amounted to 4.1 years, a 24
Higher retail sales (40%) percent return on investment
The use of local renewable and recycled
(ROI). The total payback
materials means fewer materials end up
amounted to 540 percent in
in the local landfill. The local economy
just 69 days.
benefits from reducing the extraction
and processing of non-localized virgin
Romm & Browning, Greening the Building
resources.
and the Bottom Line, 1998.
WATER
Low-flow fixtures, efficient appliances,
rainwater capture, and wastewater
treatment lessen use of potable water
and related operating costs. Green
buildings can reduce water use by 30
to 50 percent. Coast Capital Savings Office Interior
Colliers International does not guarantee, warrant or represent that the information contained
in this document is correct. Any interested party should undertake their own inquiries as to the
accuracy of the information. Colliers International excludes unequivocally all inferred or implied
terms, conditions and warranties arising out of this document and excludes all liability for loss
and damages arising there from.