Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The sixth round of FICCI’s Economic Outlook Survey was conducted during
May 2, 2011 to May 26, 2011. As part of the survey, a structured
questionnaire was drawn up and sent to key economists with a view to
gauge their perception and views on topical economic issues as well as to
seek their outlook for key macro-economic variables. 12 economists of
repute participated in the survey. These economists largely come from the
banking and financial sector. The sample also includes economists from
industry and research institutions.
The economists were asked to provide their forecast for key macro
economic variables for the year 2010-11 and 2011-12 as well as for
Quarter 1 (Apr-June) of 2011-12.
Executive Summary
♣ USD/ INR exchange rate (end March 2012) – Rs. 43.7 /USD
♣ GDP growth – 8.2 percent (Q4, 2010-11), 8.1 percent (Q1, 2011-12)
♣ Agriculture and allied activities growth – 5.8 percent (Q4, 2010-11), 4.0
percent (Q1, 2011-12)
♣ Industry growth – 5.3 percent (Q4, 2010-11), 6.5 percent (Q1, 2011-12)
2 |Page
♣ Services growth –10.1 percent (Q4, 2010-11), 9.3 percent (Q1, 2011-
12)
Executive Summary
Economists’ views on …
♣ The inflation rate around which the central bank should take a
pause with regard to tightening of key policy rates
• Majority of the economists said that the RBI should stop its current
anti- inflationary rate hikes when the inflation moderates to around 7
percent to 7.5 percent. They expect that the RBI will further increase the
repo rate by another 50-75 bps in this rate hike cycle.
• The survey participants feel that inflation may further accelerate over
the first half of the fiscal year because of the expected increase in
diesel/ LPG / kerosene and also the supply side mismatches in some
commodities like vegetables, fruits, pulses, milk and eggs.
• Some of the economists strongly suggested that RBI should target only
non- food inflation and not the food inflation. They recommended that a
pure monetary approach to manage the inflation arising of supply side
rigidities is a wrong approach and it is the duty of the government to
make the effort to bring down the food inflation
• Few of the economists opposed the consideration of a new normal level for
WPI inflation because, setting a higher normal level will only prevent a push for
structural reforms that are urgently needed to reduce the general level of
inflation and also will exacerbate inflationary expectations
• They further suggested that government may continue to bring down the
current inflation by debottlenecking the agriculture sector by taking urgent
steps to increase productivity and improving supply side management of food
products. Also to tame the inflation in the manufactured products, steps must
be taken to augment supplies of industrial inputs via greater investments in
these sectors
♣ Recent dip in FDI inflow and outlook for FDI inflows in 2011-12
4 |Page
• Survey captured following reasons for the dip in FDI inflows to India
during 2010-11:
• Against this back drop most of the surveyed economist expect that the
FDI inflow to India during the fiscal year 2011-12 will remain subdued.
However, economists are optimistic that fuller recovery in the mature
economies, together with Indian Government’s action on easing
barriers and improving the ease of doing business could increase FDI
inflows in the future.
5 |Page
♣ Annual Forecasts of GDP at Factor Cost for 2010-11
7
♣ Economists’ views on dip in FDI inflow and outlook for FDI inflow in
2011-12 16
TABLES
6 |Page
FICCI Economic Outlook Survey –May 2011
• While the economists keep the aggregate GDP estimation more or less
unchanged since January, the sector wise GDP figures show some revised
assessment. The respondents anticipate that the agriculture and allied
activity would clock a growth of 5.4 percent in 2010-11 which is a
percent point higher than their previous survey estimate. The range of the
forecast for agriculture and allied sector growth lies between a minimum of
5.0 percent to a maximum of 6.5 percent
7 |Page
2011
• Economists estimate the GDP growth at factor cost for the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010-11 to be at 8.2 percent. This forecast remains
unchanged compared to the predictions made in the previous survey for
quarter 4. The growth forecast varied within the range of 7.4 percent to 8.5
percent
2
All forecast figures indicated are the median forecast of the sample. Sample size varies as
not all participants provided quarterly projections and for all variables
8 |Page
6.5 percent projection made in the previous survey. The range of the
forecast is between 4.0 percent and 6.7 percent
3
All forecast figures indicated are the median forecast of the sample
9 |Page
growth in 2010-11. The survey forecast varied between a minimum of 8.0
percent to maximum of 8.8 percent
10 | P a g e
rate of 20.3 percent during 2011-12. Trade balance is expected to
be at a negative territory of 7.7 percent of the GDP during the same
period. Forecasters did not vary much on the projection of the trade balance
that it ranged from (-) 7.4 to (-) 7.8 percent.
11 | P a g e
FICCI Economic Outlook Survey –May 2011
• The forecast for sector wise GDP growth for Q1 of 2011-12 shows
significant upward and downward movements compared to the previous
quarter, i.e, Q4 of 2010-11. Economists see a slip in growth of agriculture
and allied activities in the Q1 of 2011-12 and estimated the primary
sector growth to be 4.0 percent. This is lower than the 5.8 percent
estimate for Q4 of 2010-11. The estimates varied within a range of 3 percent
to 5.9 percent.
4
All forecast figures indicated are the median forecast of the sample. Sample size varies as
not all participants provided quarterly projections and for all variables
12 | P a g e
• The participating economists anticipate the WPI inflation level to
continue at its current level during the first quarter of 2011-12. They have
estimated the inflation level to be at 9.1 percent showing no signs of
moderation in the initial quarter of current fiscal.
13 | P a g e
FICCI Economic Outlook Survey –May 2011
In its Monetary Policy Review on 3rd May 2011, RBI hiked both the repo and
the reverse repo rate by 50 bps each to reach 7.25 percent and 6.25 percent
respectively to tame inflation. This is the ninth raise in the key policy rates
since March 2010. Further, RBI indicated that it would continue with its
current anti-inflationary stance since the upward risks for inflation continues.
The central bank also mentions that its current anti- inflationary measures
coupled with high global crude oil and commodity prices will moderate the
growth rate.
Based on this growth and inflation scenario, FICCI asked the participating
economists their view on the inflation rate around which the central bank
should take a pause with regard to tightening of the key policy rates.
Majority of the economists said that the RBI should stop its current anti-
inflationary rate hikes when the inflation moderates to around 7 percent to
7.5 percent. However, few opined that the rate hikes may continue till the
inflation come down to 6 percent. They expect that the RBI will further
increase the repo rate by another 50-75 bps in this rate hike cycle.
The survey participants feel that inflation may further accelerate over the
first half of the fiscal year, before beginning to moderate. They believe that
14 | P a g e
the headline inflation may even breach a 10 percent mark once effects of the
expected increase in diesel/ LPG/ kerosene prices takes hold. The supply side
mismatches in some commodities like vegetables, fruits, pulses, milk and
eggs will continue to add to the inflationary pressure.
The economists estimate that though the inflationary pressures are expected
to persist in the near term, it is likely to moderate to the around 7 percent by
the end of fiscal year 2011-12. The likely reasons cited for this moderation
are:
Only when the headline inflation, core inflation and global commodity prices
begin to show a trend of moderation, the economists expect the RBI to
approach the end of its rate hike cycle.
15 | P a g e
FICCI Economic Outlook Survey –May 2011
According to RBI’s experience a high growth has coexisted with low inflation.
The central bank has maintained a threshold level of inflation within which
the growth can accentuate. As per this, RBI considers a 5 percent mark as
16 | P a g e
the comfortable level of inflation to accelerate growth. With WPI inflation
being constantly high in the range of 8 to 10 percent for the last so many
months, there is an increased discussion amongst the economists and policy
makers on whether to consider a higher level of inflation as the ‘new normal’
against the 5 percent mark presently considered normal by the RBI.
It was strongly suggested that government may continue to bring down the
current inflation by debottlenecking both the agricultural and the
manufacturing sector. In agriculture, the respondents feel an urgent
requirement to take steps to increase productivity and improving supply side
management of food products. Also to tame the inflation in the
manufactured products, steps must be taken to augment supplies of
industrial inputs via greater investments in these sectors.
17 | P a g e
♣ Economists’ views on recent dip in FDI inflow and outlook for
FDI inflow in 2011-12
Data on foreign investment flow shows that FDI inflows in the country in the
year 2010-11 have seen moderation (USD 27.02 bn) as compared to inflows
received during 2009-10 (USD 37.76 bn). It may be mentioned that this dip
in FDI flows into India has taken place at a time when FDI flows to some of
the other emerging markets have gone up in 2010 as per the findings
released by UNCTAD on global investment trends earlier this year. This
slowdown in FDI flows is a matter of concern as FDI flows are of a more
durable variety and often come with many tangible and intangible benefits.
RBI – has set up an internal working group to look into this development and
try to understand the reasons for this slowdown. While we wait for the
findings of RBI’s internal working group on this subject, it may be mentioned
that in January this year RBI had alluded to the environment sensitive
policies being pursued appear to have affected investors’ sentiments. Senior
officials in the Industry Ministry have also expressed apprehension over
slowing down of FDI and made a strong case for further liberalization of the
FDI policy framework in the country.
Given the importance of this issue, FICCI asked the view of surveyed
economists on the reasons for the slowdown in FDI during the last fiscal
2010-11. Most of the economists agreed that the main reason for this could
be the subdued recovery in the west and domestic issues of land and
environment, high inflation and corruption cases. However, one of the
respondents felt that the FDI flow India received during the fiscal 2010-11 is
not unsatisfactory as the investment we received during 2009-10 was one of
the highest and such flow cannot be expected to repeat every year.
Survey captured following reasons for the dip in FDI inflows to India during
2011-12:
18 | P a g e
o FDl flows have had a weak growth generally in 2010 as
investment cycle is yet to pick up worldwide due to global
slowdown
• Governance issues:
19 | P a g e
Against this back drop most of the surveyed economist expect that the FDI
inflow to India during the fiscal year 2011-12 will remain subdued. However,
economists are optimistic that fuller recovery in the mature economies,
together with Indian Government’s action on easing barriers and improving
the ease of doing business would increase FDI inflows in the future. Also,
with UNCTAD projections predicting higher growth in global FDI in 2011, few
of the respondents feel that some amount of these investments will flow to
India as well.
20 | P a g e
4 WPI Inflation rate (%) 6.4 6.7 7.2 5.0
5 Growth in IIP (%) 7.9 7.9 9.1 6.5
6 Merchandise Export 20.4 20.0 25.0 16.0
growth (%)
7 Merchandise Import 21.1 20.3 24.0 18.0
growth (%)
8 Trade Balance (% to GDP) -7.7 -7.7 -7.4 -7.8
9 Current Account Balance -2.9 -2.8 -2.5 -3.3
(%)
1 US$ / INR exchange rate 43.8 43.7 46.0 41.8
0
FICCI Economic Outlook
Survey – May 2011
21 | P a g e
Key Macroeconomic Quarterly Forecast
Variables Apr - June (Q1 2011-12)
Mean Median Max Min
1 GDP growth rate at factor 8.1 8.1 8.6 7.4
cost (%)
Agriculture & Allied 4.1 4.0 5.9 3.0
Industry 6.3 6.5 7.2 5.0
Services 9.6 9.3 10.4 9.0
2 Prime Lending Rate (%) 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3
3 WPI Inflation rate (%) 9.0 9.1 9.5 8.5
4 Growth in IIP (%) 7.1 6.8 8.8 5.3
5 Merchandise Export 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
growth (%)
6 Merchandise Import 25.0 25.0 30.0 20.0
growth (%)
7 Trade Balance (% to GDP) -8.6 -8.6 -8.6 -8.6
8 Current Account Balance
(%)
9 US$ / INR exchange rate 44.8 45.0 45.0 44.1
FICCI Economic Outlook
Survey – May 2011
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e