Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Fig 1
Table 2 Frequence of Interviews are more in Interview category Employee referral Campus recruitment E-recruitment Training institution Others Total No of respondent 25 20 90 10 5 150 Percentage 16 13 60 6 4 150
Percentage 80 20 100
Percentage 73 27
60 40 30 20 150
40 27 20 13
Preference
No of Respondent
Percentage
75 35 30 10 150
50 23 20 7
Table 7 Preference to other methods Interest in other Agree Strongly agree No of Respondent 10 20 Percentage 7 13
70 50
47 33
No of Respondent 60 40
Percentage
30 20
Table 9 Attraction towards quality of applicants Quality of applicant Agree Strongly agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total No of Respondent 80 20 30 20 150 Percentage
Table 10 E-recruitment reduces the paper work Reduces paper work Agree Strongly agree Disagree Strongly disagree Total No of Respondent 60 40 30 20 150 Percentage
No of Respondent 50
Percentage
50 30 20 150
Table 12 E-Recruitment allows faster responds to the candidates Faster response Agree Strongly agree Disagree Strongly disagree No of Respondent 60 40 30 20 150 Percentage
Table 13 Referral policy in your organization Referral yes no No of Respondent 120 30 Percentage
No of Respondent 75
Percentage
25 30 20 150
Table 15 Interview process inside the company Interview prcoess Individual Sequential Panel None of these Total No of Respondent 75 25 30 20 150 Percentage
Table 16 Basis of recruitment Basis of recriutment Experience qualification Communication skills All the above No of Respondent 30 20 20 80 Percentage
Table 17 Method of recruitment easy source to hire the best talent Best source No of Respondent Percentage
90 20 10 30 150
Table 18 Sufficient training provided Training yes no Total No of Respondent 130 20 150 Percentage
Table 19 Modern sources of recruitment Modern techniques Walkin Tele recruitment e-reruitment All the above Total No of Respondent 30 10 100 10 150 Percentage
Satisfaction
No of Respondent
percentage
Yes No Total
130 20 150