Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Key points:
The term resilience is applied to both the status of adapting or reacting positively to adversity, and to the social processes and practices which seem to foster these positive reactions. We have identied two different types of resilient practices (things people do to cope in difcult circumstances) : incidental and reactive.
An incidental source of resilience might be a something someone has been doing anyway for a long time which promotes health and well-being but which becomes a very important part of coping when difculties arise. A reactive source of resilience is something someone does as a direct response to difcult circumstances.
Sometimes, adopting a risky (i.e. potentially health damaging) behaviour can in itself be a resilient practice. Examples include children stealing food to eat when none is provided by parents, or adults staying unemployed to maintain eligibility for a valued support service. Policy makers may be able to learn how to help people face adversity by studying those who have managed to get by or do better than expected in difcult circumstances.
Research Unit in Health, Behaviour and Change, School of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG. www.chs.med.ed.ac.uk/ruhbc/
RUHBC
Resilient populations: a geographical perspective. (ESRC Research Network, Development and persistence of human capability and resilience in their social and geographical context).
b
Surviving parental drug and alcohol use: experiences of older children of drug and alcohol using parents: risk and resilience. With the Centre for Research on Families and Relationships (CRFR) (Joseph Rowntree Foundation)
c
Childrens concerns about parents and signicant others health and well-being. (ESRC) With the Centre for Research on Families and Relationships (CRFR)
d
Gilligan R. (2003) Promoting childrens resilience - some reections. Paper presented at the launch event for the Glasgow Centre for the Child and Society, University of Glasgow
(See RUHBC website for further details of these projects and research teams)
whole of the resilience approach. Resilience theorists from other disciplinesd urge that we step back from simply identifying risk or protective factors and their interrelationships, and examine the underlying social processes and practices by which positive outcomes may be achieved. While resilience promoting processes may not always achieve a denably resilient outcome, we can nevertheless learn more about how resilience can be supported and fostered by studying these processes. Second, whilst resilient outcomes may be rare, adversity is widespread. Further understanding of the means by which some people and places apparently do better in such circumstances may have policy relevance for planning to help others in the future.
and well-being under adverse circumstances than under benign circumstances. To continue the example of the children supported by aunts or grandparents, ordinarily their contact may have little impact on, or signicance for, that young persons health and well-being, but under adverse circumstances it may become tremendously important. Similarly, free coal may have a much greater protective effect when offered to an unemployed family than when the family is in work. In this way, a resilience approach can extend the more conventional risk and protective factor approach by recognising that the context and timing in which a protective factor operates might be signicant for its value in promoting resilience.
Implications
It is perhaps too soon in our programme of research into resilience to offer policy recommendations. We can however, offer some implications of our work for future research which we (and we hope others) will focus on.
There is a great need to focus on the well in addition to the sick in all health research. There is a need to understand more about the factors and contexts which determine whether a resilient practice helps in the face of adversity, or not. A resilience approach helps research on risk and risky behaviours by placing them in the context of peoples lives.
RUHBC was established in 1983 to improve understanding of the processes and mechanisms which inuence the health and well-being of the Scottish population, and to enhance the contribution of knowledge to the development of policy and practice interventions for health. RUHBC is funded by the Chief Scientist Ofce (Scottish Executive Health Department). There are around 20 staff and four PhD students in the unit. It forms part of the Division of Community Health Sciences in the School of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, within the College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine at the University of Edinburgh.
Research Unit in Health, Behaviour and Change, School of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG. www.chs.med.ed.ac.uk/ruhbc/