There exists the Gravitational Theory of Life confirmation, in the cancer cure problem!

I just found (June, 3) an interesting material: http://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/24/2B/1003.full.pdf. I stressed the following regarding the role of the nervous system in cancer pathology and that this specific mechanism was not known at the time (2004):
Cancer survival decreases in patients experiencing various psychosocial stresses (1), suggesting a potential role for the central nervous system in progression of malignancy. Specifically, stress- induced changes in neuroendocrine and immune functions may contribute to cancer mortality (2). Stress not only alters the neuroendocrine system, but also modifies sensory nerve function. 1. Neurons sensitive to capsaicin mediate inflammatory pain and are important targets for management of chronic pain. These neurons also regulate local tissue homeostasis, inflammation, healing and development, especially under conditions of psychological stress. Stress contributes to increased cancer recurrence and metastasis through as yet undefined mechanisms. Likewise, activity of capsaicinsensitive neurons is altered by pathological conditions that may lead to metastatic growth (e.g. stress). Therefore, we examined effects of a treatment that induces sensory nerve denervation on breast cancer metastases. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that CSFs (capsaicinsensitive sensory nerve fibers) influence the capacity of cancer cells to metastasize. Considering these observations, we expected diminished metastasis following denervation by capsaicin treatment. However, we observed the opposite: metastasis to vital organs increased.

Very interesting: this approach is probably among the few in the world (yet I do not know some others) which refers strictly to the denervation principle. Even in the U.S. patent, on the use of botulinum toxin (mentioned above) the denervation is just a collateral phenomenon to which it refers. These expectations, very specific, maybe follows the publication, in Romania, of materials relating to the Gravitational Ttheory of Life, first time in 2001. The time will answer this question. Although, apparently, the experiment had negative results, below I will demonstrate that, at least this experiment is an undeniable proof of the validity of methods of cancer treatment based on the principle of denervation (resulting from Gravitational Theory of Life).

I get back to what I said above (Cancers secrets) in relation to the mechanism of formal removal of a structure from the general context of the body (which is equivalent with a physical damage for it): So, is reached the inaccurate situation in which "THE PART leads on "THE WHOLE"! This is also the essence of the process of "learning": subjecting the "body" of a single type of stimulus, exclusively and repeated, with higher frequency than that at which body can return, every time, at the initial state (and, thus, to maintaining the global state of homeostasis, relative to normal environmental conditions). Forcing him to react only with the structures imposed by the nature of that stimulus, is generated the pulling out of these specific structures from the general context of functioning of the body (which means a really physical "aggression"). The nuance which should be emphasized is that the process of "learning" is identical to any other process carried out by repetition and which, by default, generates stress. And stress is a physical assault even though, by its nature (purely formal) cannot be described as the effect of a physical causes, narrowly defined in time and space. It is produced by repetition, with a frequency value over a certain limit, of any kind of stimulus that generate only repeated partial reactions, initially by conditioned reflex mechanisms (rational), and after that, only by reflex mechanisms (e.g. riding a bicycle). I described above the model of the Gravitational Theory of Life relative to that type of stimulus, and his role in the evolution of the processes that lead to cancer. On the basis of that "unexpected" results, in part of discussions", it says that denervation process with capsaicin did not directly intensified in metastasis. As I stated above, cancer evolving based on two strictly distinct mechanisms, which take place simultaneously: 1) Malignant processes under the influence of the parasympathetic nervous system activity at the stromal level, involving the invasive, active effects of these processes, 2) The uncontrolled proliferation of malignant cells in the parenchyma. I showed that, if the malignant process consists exclusively of 2) processes, the feedback loops that maintain the geometric - functional stability would generate efficient reactions of structures of the body's against to a "non self" structure (as is known to be the tumor) that should move the healthy tissue, in its development. Precisely to avoid the reactions of this system, the healthy tissue is not "pushed" but "replaced". These possible reactions are generated by the systems covered by the experiment in question. If the tumor grows and the system which must check the growth (the sensitive system) is removed from his function at what can we expect? It makes sense that the tumor(s) will grow easier. Then why there were some different expectations (such as this treatment, as was thought, to lead at stop of tumor evolution)? More: it is known the mechanism of interstimulant antagonism described by Romanian doctor, Daniel Danielopolu. http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/82/4/402.full Through this mechanism the activity of the parasympathetic autonomous system, responsible for malignant processes (and, thus, for the replacing of healthy tissue) from the stroma, should be intensified, according to the experimental protocol. And this is what it happened!

In short, in this experiment was performed the denervation of the "system not of the tumor (it was operated at the sensitive, sympathetic level of autonomic nervous system). So the tumor was free to grow and "roam" at will until a certain time when they felt the effects of atropine. Atropine (It is a competitive antagonist for the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. It is classified as year anticholinergic drug (parasympatholytic) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atropine) was used for technical" reasons, and obviously at the parasympathetic levels (effectors cells), not at sensitive level as the text says (Atropine (5 mg / kg, ip) administered was immediately before capsaicin injection to prevent acute effects of cardiopulmonary sensory mediators released excessively). In accordance with the model from above (see Cancers secrets), the results of this experiment are perfectly explicable: the mechanism is accelerating, then is modulating (due to the interstimulant antagonism"), the process of metastasis. The tumor is an effecting structure! At this level you have acted (see U.S. Patent)! The fact that all phenomena described in this experiment are entirely modeled by Gravitational Theory of Life it is one (at least) indisputable proof of the validity of the conclusions of this theory!