Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Table of Contents
Overview of Student Research 5
Economics: Subsidy Reform Education: Public Awareness and Workforce Training Fossil Fuels: Transportation and Electricity Nuclear Power: New Technology and Increased Production Renewable Energy: Implementation and Storage Energy Efficiency: Commercial, Industrial and Residential Buildings Conclusion: Looking Forward, 2050 and Beyond Bibliography Acknowledgements
10
13
18
27
32
41
48
50 56
Keystone allowed me, as an up and coming member of society, to express and share my views, talents, experiences, as well as my culture in a meaningful and constructive way that is more likely to affect a policy change.
-Andreas Kofler, Participant
Electricity-Renewable (Solar, Wind, Biomass, Geothermal, etc) Electricity-Fossil Fuels (Coal, Natural Gas, Carbon Capture and Storage, etc) Electricity-Nuclear (New and existing technology for production and waste storage) Transportation-Fuels (Including gas, electric, batteries and renewables, etc) Transportation-Public, Private, Commercial, Industrial (Trains, bus, subways, passenger cars, shipping, etc) Buildings Efficienc y- Residential, Commercial, Industrial (Products, behavior, systems, etc) Education and Workforce Development (What options exist to train and develop a new workforce and educate the general population for behavior changes associated with Energy Innovation)
Stakeholder Assignments
In addition to their energy research topics, each student was asked to represent the interests of an important stakeholder involved in the energy conversation. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) composed of environmental groups, consumer advocacy groups, coalitions and social justice groups who are non profits. Public Sector, including federal, state and local government agencies Private Sector, including corporations and organizations that are in the energy production or transmission sector, provide engineering services or manufacturing for energy sector or who are large consumers of energy. Academia, Education and Research institutions
Summary Timeline
By Year
Idea/ Goal
Begin a f ive-y ear education plan to increase public awareness about alternativ e energy sources, as well as implement workforce training programs. Begin f iv e y ear adv isory period for the fossil f uel industry to initiate transition to natural gas Halt increase of f ossil f uel subsidies and begin reallocation 100% state IECC Building Code compliance (2016). Retrof it 10% of commercial and industrial buildings 35.5 minimum MPG standard for new cars and light trucks (2016) Increase nuclear power capacity Begin large- scale natural gas transition (incentiv ized) Use subsidy money to research and dev elop algal f uel, renewable technologies and nuclear energy Increase nuclear power capacity, complete reprocessing f acilities 25% Natural Gas, 25% remains fossil fuels (oil/ coal) 30% Nuclear 20% Renewables Continue to promote and develop transition to natural gas Increase nuclear power capacity, complete national storage facility One million plug-in hy brids on the road 35% net-zero buildings in U.S. Creation of the National Commissioning Collaborativ e to ov ersee building efficiency No new coal operations can continue in former sites, no new mines opened Promote natural gas vehicle technology on a large- scale 30% renewables (20% wind, 5% solar, hy dro, 5% geothermal) Natural gas, electric, electric hybrid automobile technology incorporated into the priv ate sector 75% net-zero buildings in U.S. 15% natural gas, 5% oil, 40% renewable, 40% nuclear 100% net-zero buildings in U.S.
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2040 2050
8
Introduction
In this paper, we, the students, present a set of recommendations for energy innovation in the United States for the next 40 years and beyond that will move the country off of its dependence on oil and coal towards a more sustainable future. We created a timeline to remake our countrys energy portfolio, which includes a transition from coal and oil, using natural gas as a bridge fuel; emphasizes renewable and nuclear energy for electricity; uses algal-based fuels and electrification for transportation; and focuses on energy efficiency in the buildings sector. We will encourage this transition with a redeployment of existing Federal subsidies in fossil fuels to renewable energy, and a large focus on education and public awareness.
10
11
12
Public Awareness
First steps in expanding renewable energys role in America begins with education. In the first five years of this plan (2010-2015), public awareness through media campaigns, energy ambassadors, and community sessions will expedite the nations shift towards energy efficiency and decreased reliance on fossil fuels. These include the creation of commercials and internet ads, and will cost roughly $100 million annually. These ambassadors would come from non-governmental organizations and will host workshops at schools and community events, touting the benefits of a green lifestyle and simple changes the public can make to be "greener." Also, ambassadors would educate students on methods of energy efficiency in communities and the best sources of renewable energy regionally. Lastly, we suggest that mandated community sessions be held. Led by town leaders and based on the community's support or disdain for green energy, these sessions will be informal and designed to cater to the average citizen and their concerns. Ideally, such sessions would address issues such as the widespread NIMBY1 (Not-In-My-Back-Yard) syndrome and other common misconceptions.
1 The
term used to describe opposition to new dev elopment close to or within residential areas. This includes new power plants, wind turbines, transportation improv ements. (Merriam-Webster 1980).
13
We recommend education changes on the K-12 level. An increased emphasis on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education will promote continued energy innovation. Specific changes include the continued creation of specialized STEM high schools and training programs for AP math and science teachers. To increase the number of these teachers, 10,000 new STEM teachers must be recruited and trained annually ("Rising Above the Storm"). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 insured this endeavor's start by providing funds for the Teacher Quality Enhancement Recovery Plan, which aims to increase numbers of teachers from quality teacher preparation programs as well as improve curriculum ("Program Plan"). Education plays a vital role in the first few years of this policy. If nuclear energy is to play a larger role in the future, as we recommend, then a re-education of the public on nuclear power and its true dangers and its true potential as an energy source is the key to the success of this policy. In order to accomplish this, the industry should host over 1,000 community and K-12 general education programs per year to educate the general public, promoting safe, clean energy through a combination of nuclear and renewable resources. The nuclear industry should also provide 1,000 scholarships for nuclear engineering and other nuclear related fields through the Department of Education. Funding for these scholarships could be offset from the portion of subsidies the Department of Education receives annually for the advancement of sustainable energy. The number of scholarships may be subject to change depending on the funding and the need of the industry. The scholarships are meant to provide skilled workers for the nuclear industry. We recommend that this education program remain in place annually until at least 2050. In addition, a part of the education budget, about $50 million every year, will be
14
Workforce Training
President Obama outlined a plan to increase the use of renewable energy in the electric sector to 25 percent by 2025, implying a significant increase in renewable energy jobs ("Obama's Energy Plan"). To address this new demand for scientists, engineers, and physicists, we recommend that new scholarship and internship programs be developed. To train new technicians and electricians, which make up the majority of the clean energy industry, community colleges and vocational schools should also receive allotments to train those workers. These programs would put students on the track for clean renewable and non-renewable energy degrees, and we believe would cost about $50 million in the next fi ve years. Scholarships for specific energy areas, including nuclear energy and solar power, would be based on demand calculated by colleges and universities, and allocations should be reassessed every five years. Though education of the public on these options seems expensive over the short run, it will more than pay itself back in reduced energy imports and potential net renewable exports for states, a heightened public awareness of energy concerns and green jobs.
15
Government Support
Along with focused education campaigns, we recommend Federal government recognition of state- and community-based programs and initiatives. This action costs little money to the government, but does serve to get the name of the organization out into the open. There has already been a precedent set for a government agency endorsing the work of a nonprofit or private business; one example of a Federal-state governmental partnership committed to renewable energy is the National Association of State Energy Officials (NASEO) partnership with EnergyStar. Another potential partnership that would engage the social element would be a partnership with public works organizations, such as
16
17
In the year 2015, we recommend the fossil fuel industry jump-start the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energies by initiating a five-year advisory period. This period is to be used primarily for educating individual fossil fuel corporations by means of stakeholder meetings where discussions will be held over which alternate energy sources are the most economically beneficial for each specific corporation. This will incorporate the pros and cons of investment in energy sources such as natural gas, solar, wind, and nuclear, along with the governments business-oriented
18
19
We recommend oil corporations transition their investments toward natural gas as a temporary, transitional energy source in place of their current product. Natural gas is the cleanest of all fossil fuels, releasing about 117,000 pounds of emissions per billion Btu 2 energy input, compared to the 208,000 pounds currently released by coal. Additionally, natural gas exists in the United States in much larger quantities than oil, meaning that its use would entail less importation of foreign oil (Resources Naturalgas.org). The transition away from oil to natural gas would not run a higher risk of endangering U.S. international relations with oil producing countries, especially those related to the United States relationship with OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries). A switch to natural gas would not cause a shift in the current international fuel-trade power structure because although the United States is the 6 th largest producer of natural gas, it is preceded by five OPEC nations who currently possess natural gas in larger quantities. From an international standpoint, transitioning to natural gas in the short-term would allow the U.S. to move away from the worst of the fossil fuels without upsetting current oil-based relations, which are on the same path to natural gas (Natural Gas and Technology). The Obama-Biden comprehensive New Energy for America plan in 2009 called for a projected goal of obtaining 25 percent of our nations electricity from renewable sources by the year 2025, as well as reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050 (U.S. Department of Energy). In order to allow for this rise in energy from alternative, cleaner resources and to best meet the Obama-Biden plan, the fossil
2
Source: EPA.gov
British thermal unit- energy unit equal to approximately 1.06 kilojoules. (NaturalGas.org).
20
Coal
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, coal accounts for approximately 50 percent of electric power generation in the U.S. (EPA Energy Trends). The consumption of coal accounts for around 40 percent of the countrys CO2 emissions (Gardner). We believe the American public will need to shift to a much more anti-coal mindset. In order to reach the United States responsibilities in combating climate change by reducing carbon emissions by 80 percent in America, the coal industry is going to be drastically cut back (America.gov). The fossil fuel corporations will have known about the upcoming changes and been
21
Transportation
The transportation industry consumes about 29 percent of the total energy usage in the United States (U.S. Energy Information Administration). The backbone of Western society consists of the use of cars, trucks, boats, planes, and trains to transport people and goods, which rely on oil for 98 percent of their transportation needs (Americas Energy Future, p. 331). The last few decades have seen a dramatic increase in energy consumption. More than 19.5 million barrels of oil are consumed in the United States every day (CIA The World Factbook). Since 56 percent of petroleum to meet the U.S.s energy
22
In today's industry, it seems to be an acceptable truth that there will be safety violations that will be followed by fines. However, the costs of fixing and stopped production are less than paying the fines, so the problems are ignored and the fines are paid, but money is still made. For example, before the mine disaster in the Upper Big Branch mine 3, there had been 1,300 recorded safety violations (Roddy & Vi vian). When considering the recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, British Petroleum (BP) ignored its many safety violations for the simple reason that it was more profitable at the time to be unsafe than safe (Despite Finding 200 Violations). The remedy is to provide an incentive to make the work space safer. We propose fines be increased in order to raise the level of accountability undertaken by corporations in energy endeavors. The current system for oil companies is that they can be fined a max of $35,000 dollars a day for a
3 April,
2010 an explosion on the Upper Big Branch Mine killed 29 people (Urbina, nytimes.com).
23
Vehicles
Our group considered the issue of raising fuel efficiency standards. The issue of raising the miles-per-gallon standard is difficult; no company wants to be forced to do something, even if it may help them in the end. Over the short-term, we decided to use the standard that President Obama set at 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 for all new cars and light trucks (Voorhees). After 2016, we hope to encourage increasingly efficient vehicles, so industry will raise their fuel efficiency as necessary as people demand better gas mileage. By 2025 we hope to see at least one million plug-in hybrids on the road, which will significantly decrease our carbon dioxide emissions. The funding from the subsidies and the plug-in charging stations should increase consumer demand and pave the way for clean public and private sectors. Year 2040 will also bring in a new wave of automobile technology in the private sector, especially in the fields of natural gas, electric and electric-hybrid (plug-in hybrid). A natural gas vehicle currently reduces CO2 emissions by 25 percent, while also emitting lower numbers of toxic pollutants and particulate matter (Gable). Compressed natural gas is also measured in gallons equivalent to that of gasoline (Gable). Further, as oil becomes scarce and gets more expensive, companies will have difficulty paying for truck gas. In order to counter this economic and ecologic hazard, we recommend that truckers switch to natural gas as a fuel. Natural gas costs 40 percent less than gasoline and has an 80 percent reduction in emissions (Compressed Natural Gas).
24
Finally, an electric vehicle currently uses the electricity stored in a battery to power an electric motor. Due to the use of electricity, there are no tailpipe emissions and these cars are 99 percent cleaner than conventional vehicles, capable of cutting emissions by 70 percent (Union of Concerned Scientists). These technologies lower oil imports, greenhouse gases and pollution in the long run, and by the year 2040 we recommend these technologies be incorporated into the private sector, with an established infrastructure behind them.
Public Transportation
We recommend that a boost is given to further enhance the development of public transportation: an E Prize. Modeled after an X prize 4 , the E Prize would be a competition to judge the most innovative technological design for public transportation, which includes boats, planes, buses, and trains. The challenge would be open to
4
A $10 million plus grand prize given to the first team to achieve a goal set forth by the X Prize Foundation. The goal is to benefit humanity in a new, innovative way. (X Prize Foundation, 2010).
25
One area of concern during the transition away from oil is aviation because of the current lack of a viable alternative. Recent rises in jet fuel prices have resulted in extreme stress on airline companies to find a dependable alternative fuel to power their jets. This has raised interest in algal jet fuel research, which was briefly studied in the 1990s. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) promotes research, development, and deployment of algal fuels in jets. Its goal is for all members is to use a minimum of ten percent alternative fuels in flight by 2017 (IATA). Se veral companies, such as Air New Zealand, Continental Airlines, and Virgin Airlines are currently conducting trials with algal fuel (Bisignani). The price of research, development, and start-up of algal fuels as an alternative fuel for flight could be paid for through the use of the remaining fossil fuel subsidies. In 2020, the amount of subsidies not transferred to renewable energy would average out to $2.5 billion, which allows ample room for algal fuel investment (Snathanam).
26
27
Research
We recommend that during the next fifteen years, funding for research and development of renewable and non-renewable energy sources increase. This can be accomplished by an annual research allotment of $2.3 billion from the Department of Energy, as outlined by the President's 2011 National Budget plan ("FY-11 Budget"). Of the $2.3 billion total, we recommend that $1.5 billion should be allocated towards nuclear energy research, which includes expanded research on current nuclear technologies as well as the creation of strategies for the disposal of nuclear wastes. The remaining $800 million can fund research for non-renewable energy sources and basic energy-efficiency measures. We recommend a similar trend of increased research funding be seen in the mid- and long-term future. Specifically, we hope to see a 25 percent increase in research funding over 2015 levels by 2025. Similarly, we recommend an increase of 50 percent over 2015 levels by 2050. These research funds will continue to go towards the promotion of nuclear and non-renewable energy, but will fluctuate with need. We
28
2015 We suggest that by the year 2015 all thirteen reactors currently in the decommissioning process 5 be upgraded to newer generation reactors (National Regulatory Commission). At an average cost of $1.9 billion per plant, this will increase the production of each of these reactors by about 25 percent or enough energy to power a minimum of 800,000 homes (Nuclear Energy Institute). In addition to the updated reactors, we recommend construction of twelve newer generation reactors at an estimated cost of $6 to $10 billion each. Every new plant can generate approximately 1.5 gigawatts of electricity (GWe); this number will increase as the technology is improved over time (World Nuclear Association). Each construction site will create 3,500 jobs for a three to five year period while the plant is being constructed, and about 800 permanent jobs for the operation of each plant. We also recommend building ten advanced fast reactors 6 that will use reprocessed nuclear waste along with the appropriate supporting infrastructure such as fuel reprocessing sites. Each fastbreeder reactor will generate approximately 1.2
5 6
Decommissioning is the act of saf ely remov ing the nuclear reactor from service and reducing residual radioactivity in the area ( USNRC). Fast-breeder reactors: reactors that produce more plutonium than they consume (World Nuclear Association)
29
Final Recommendations
Source: USNRC
GWe; again this number is subject to change as technology is improved over time (International Panel on Fissile Materials). Also in the works should be a fission-fusion hybrid reactor that will be used to initiate research programs aiming to increase nuclear efficiency. To accommodate waste, we recommend a site be selected for the location of a national nuclear waste storage facility as well as the construction of reprocessing infrastructure to produce fuel for fast-breeder reactors. Intensive government funded research will be an ongoing process to find new ways to recycle and eliminate radioactive waste produced by the nuclear power plants.
2020 We suggest that an additional twelve newer generation reactors be constructed, in addition to four more fission-fusion hybrid research reactors. These hybrid reactors, depending on the technological advancement, can either be used to continue and increase the amount of research being done or will be able to be used commercially in the future. An additional thirty older generation reactors should be upgraded to newer
30
2025 By 2025 we recommend that thirty more reactors should have been upgraded to the newer generation reactors. An additional twelve newer generation reactors would be constructed along with thirty additional fast-breeder reactors. We recommend construction of a national storage site for nuclear wastes by this date and will be ready to begin accepting nuclear materials. Fast breeder reactors should be using reprocessed fuel and nuclear waste management research funded by the Department of Energy should prove beneficial at this time. 2030 In 2030, nuclear energy should continue to expand its production capabilities. An additional thirty old reactors should have been updated and twenty newer generation reactors will have been constructed. At this time nuclear generated electricity will be producing enough energy to account for approximately 30 percent of the nations energy needs.
2040 Twenty-fi ve additional newer generation reactors and ten fast-breeder reactors should be constructed. Additionally, we suggest all remaining older generation reactors in the United States be upgraded to newer generation reactors. 2050 We recommend that by the year 2050 an additional twenty-five newer generation reactors will have been completed creating a total of 210 reactors and fifty fast breeder reactors in the United States. By this time between forty and fifty percent of the electricity in the United States will be provided by nuclear energy.
31
32
Source: knowledge.allianz.com
We recommend that the Department of Energy set aside $1.9 billion of their $13 billion annual loan budget to support low-interest loans (at an interest rate of approximately 2.5 percent) for community projects designed to green their communities. Initiatives such as these would empower citizens in the business sector to create their own sustainable projects, even before more massive action is implemented.
33
Wind Power
To accomplish the goal we have set for renewable energy, several sectors of renewable energy must be expanded, including wind, solar and geothermal. Studies have shown that with sufficient funding, wind power could account for 20 percent of energy consumption by 2030, through utilizing 30,000 square miles in the American Southwest. (DOE, 20% Wind). This scenario is based on a number of primary assumptions, namely wind turbine energy production increasing by 15 percent and wind turbine costs decreasing by about ten percent. For one-fifth of the nations electricity to be provided by wind, about 300 gigawatts (GW) would have to be generated by wind. Estimates for the direct cost to society is about $43 billion, translating to roughly about $0.50 monthly per consumer (DOE, 20% Wind) We recommend this target, which would require annual installations to increase more than threefold. Indeed, achieving 20 percent wind will require the number of annual turbine installations to increase from approximately 2000 in 2006 to almost 7000 in 2017. Costs of integrating intermittent wind power into the grid are modest; 20 percent wind can be reliably integrated into the grid for less than 0.5 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) (DOE, 20% Wind, p. 25). No material constraints currently exist, although demand for copper, fiberglass and other raw materials will increase. Clearly, achieving 20 percent wind is not limited
34
35
Solar Power
The capability of solar power is enormous. Energy from the sun is virtually unlimited, says the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems which declares that the ratio of the sunshine on the solid part of the earth to the total power needs of the humans on Earth in 2020 is 6:1 (Johnson, 34). In the U.S. alone, only 2.5 percent of the solar radiation received by 250,000 square miles in the American Southwest is necessary to match the countrys total energy consumption in 2006 (Zweibel, 64). The International Energy Agency (IEA) has reported that solar photovoltaic and concentrated solar power together could account for about 22 percent of global electricity production by 2050. Concentrated solar power would supply one fifth of the solar energy.7 The IEA also expects photovoltaic technology fitted on residential and commercial buildings to reach grid parity by 2020.8 Photovoltaic systems in particular show the potential for strong growth over the next century, albeit with time and constant funding. Zweibel describes in one particular study, solar energy could power 69 percent of the electricity demand by 2050 and 35 percent of its total energy, but would require substantial investments in research and the development of a radically different infrastructure. In this plan, 30,000 square miles of photovoltaic arrays would be erected to provide almost 3,000 GW of power (Zweibel, 66). Compressed-air energy storage would be used to maintain excess power for dark hours. A high-voltage direct-current transmission system would be used to send electricity to the
7
36
Producing concentrated solar power requires long, metallic mirrors to f ocus sunlight onto a fluid-f illed pipe, heating it and then running the f luid through a heat exchanger, producing steam that turns a turbine. Sixteen hours of storage would be needed for electricity to be generated f or 24 hours (Zweibel, 67).
8
Grid Parity : consistent cost-competitiveness with conventional f ossil f uels and nuclear power (International Energy Agency ).
The Smart Grid is an automated electric power system that monitors and controls grid activities, ensuring the twoway flow of electricity and information between power plants and consumersand all points in between. What makes this grid "smart" is the ability to sense, monitor, and, in some cases, control (automatically or remotely) how the system operates or behav es under a given set of conditions. (Smartgrid.gov ).
37
As further research is completed in the area of renewable energy, new technologies will be created and improved. By 2030, geothermal power is expected to provide five percent of the U.S. electricity, if not more (Mims). Geothermal accounts for a large portion of the renewable energy base of the United States. As newer and
Source: Green, p.3.
safer methods of drilling are developed, geothermal power is expected to become a major power player in the energy industry, more than it already is.
Currently, hydroelectric power is responsible for about six percent of U.S. electricity, but over the next fifty to one hundred years, that number will decrease ("Electric 2008", p. 11). Due to the controversial nature of hydroelectric power and the adverse ecological impact of dams, hydroelectric power will be slowly phased out of the electricity and energy sectors. Another point of contention concerns the impending water crisis. We believe the American public should not have to choose between clean, renewable energy and water.
38
Following the five year period dedicated to education (2010-2015), our subsidy reallocation plan dictates that renewable energy technology will begin to receive at least 60 percent of a redistributed fossil fuel subsidies. Initially, this will mean a subsidy of $600 million in 2015. This amount will increase steadily until 2025 when renewable energy will receive roughly $7 billion annually out of the $11.8 billion fund, starting that year. We suggest that the $7 billion generated from the diminished fossil fuel subsidies will also be used to research energy storage and transmission capabilities. In the realm of innovative ways to ease the transition to renewable energy and to diminish the intermittency of sustainable energy, gravel batteries have been shown by an independent UK technology firm, Isentropic, to be useful in energy storage. These batteries were used in a hydroelectric setting. Isentropic claims the round-trip energy efficiency of up to eighty percent and the cost of a system per kilowatt-hour of storage to be between $10 and $55 (Isentropic). The issue of energy storage after peak hours for sunlight could also come in the form of solar-powered electrolyzers, splitting water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. Excess daytime electricity from solar panels can power the electrolyzer and the gases could then be recombined in a fuel cell to yield electricity, with the only by-product being water (Johnson, p. 50). 10
10
Electrolyzer
Some additional energy storage technologies currently being researched, past the conv entional method pumped storage, are a large-scale energy island offshore energy storage system, testing advanced storage technologies f or ancillary serv ices, an adv anced high temperature superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) system, a high temperature superconducting f ault current limiter, a compact high-temperature superconductor hydropower generator, a small-scale electricity storage system and flexible storage for distributed generation. In the electricity sector, pressurized air storage and electrochemical storage in f uel cells will contribute to the enhancement of the sy stem (EREC, p. 8).
39
HTS Cable
Source: physicsw orld.com
By 2050, our renewable energy technology and production capabilities should reach a level that they can account for 40 percent of all U.S. energy consumption. The money spent on renewable energy will be used to develop these technologies, and establish long-term storage systems. These investments, in addition to an innovative distribution system will make large movements towards a renewable society.
40
Increasing the efficiency of buildings will not only have profoundly beneficial effects on the environment, but can also be achieved through the process of green building. Green building is the practice of creating and using healthier and more resourceefficient models of construction, renovation, operation, maintenance and demolition (U.S. EPA Green Building). According to the United States Green Building Council (USGBC), green buildings in comparison with average buildings have: 26 % less energy needs 13 % lower maintenance costs 33% fewer greenhouse gas emissions (USGBC).
Green building
To encourage more green building practices, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) implemented the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). These codes are guidelines that apply to new buildings to guarantee that newly built
41
To avoid the excessive government spending that would normally be incurred by this sort of project, we suggest that the government use performance contracting, which government and other organizations already use for building renovation projects. For example, the National Association of Energy Service Companies (NAESCO) funds 70 percent of their building projects using performance contracting (ICF International). Using this method, businesses take out a loan, which is then paid back over a period
42
43
Based on the Department of Energys Save Energy Now program, by 2015, the government needs to have converted 10 percent of all existing commercial and industrial buildings to be at least 25 percent more energy efficient, (DOE Save Energy Now). From this year forward, the federal government should be required to assist in the renovation of 10% of the remaining commercial and industrial buildings in each state every 3 years. In the residential sector, we recommend the 34 states that have the ability to reach the IECC 2009 residential building standard will be required to meet that standard by 2015.11 The 16 states that are not predicted to be able to meet the IECC 2009
11
44
Some recommendations for states set to meet the 2009 IECC standards by 2016 South and North Dakota, Wy oming and Texas: These states (with the exception of Wy oming) are large agricultural centers and have strong potential wind energy (Agriculture receipts: Total, Wind Maps and Wind Resource Potential Estimates). This can be used to help said states meet the 2003 IECC standards that will be the national minimum in 2015. Wind energy companies would rent out a portion of agricultural land (determined by the land owner and the company) for $3,000 to $5,000 per windmill (for the land required for one turbine) per year (Wind Power's Cash Crop). This would make citizens and developers more willing to build new buildings in compliance with the IECC standards of 2003, which would allow these states to begin their required accelerated efficiency programs by 2015.
To further advance and push for energy efficiency in buildings, we recommend creating a National Commissioning Collaborative by 2025, based off of the California Commissioning Collaborative (CCC), which follows the Department of Energys strategy for building commissioning.12 The CCC is a nonprofit public corporation that advocates for and makes commissioning towards energy efficient buildings possible. This organization makes training and education accessible so that California may reach its goals in energy efficiency. Through their efforts they have worked to spread knowledge about commissioning and make it a standardized process. Implementing practices such as those piloted by the CCC, a National Commissioning Collaborative will allow for the government to observe the progress of the nation with respect to energy efficiency in
12
Building co mmissioning is the process of ensuring that systems are designed, installed, functionally tested and capable of being operated and maintained according to the owner's operational needs. Commissioning is performed in new construction projects and in major capital improvements or retrof its (California Commissioning Collaborative).
45
Tax Incentives
We feel that a great deal must be done to encourage on site energy production in buildings. If buildings are self-sustainable or at least can provide for the majority of their energy needs, they are investing in Americas burgeoning renewable energy industry and taking another step toward sustainability. Se veral states, such as Illinois, have adopted a policy that will not tax more for solar energy systems than conventional energy systems on property taxes, incentivizing purchases dramatically (Special Assessment for Solar Energy DSIRE). We recommend that by 2025, each state must develop a standardized code for property tax incentives regarding renewable energy systems with a minimum baseline of dropping normal property ta xes of renewable energy systems by 50 percent.
By continuing efforts enacted in the short term as well as implementing new measures in this range of 2025 onward, we believe it is a feasible goal for the entire nation to be at 35 percent net-zero energy in existing buildings by 2025. Net-zero means that these buildings would produce as much energy as they consumed, or receive this energy from renewable sources, as defined by off-site net zero energy consumption (National
46
47
48
49
Bibliography
20% Wind Energy by 2030. U.S. Department of Energy. Ma y 2008. Print. Available online <http://www.20percentwind.org/>. "Ad vanced Nuclear Power Reactors | Generation III Nuclear Reactors." World Nuclear Association | Nuclear Power - a Sustainable Energy Resource. Web. 18 June 2010. <http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf08.html>. Alternative Fueling Station Total Counts by State and Fuel Type. U.S. Department of Energy. 2 June 2010. 15 June 2010 <http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/fuels/ stations_counts.html>. America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation. Washington, D.C.: National Academies, 2009. Print. American Superconductor. Superconductor Power Cables. Web. 18 June 2010. http://www.isentropic.co.uk/index.php?page=storage American Youthworks. Casa Verde Builders. Web. 15 June 2010. http:// www.americanyouthworks.org/green-jobs-programs/casa-verde-builders "Annual Energy Review." U.S. Energy Information Administration: Independent Statistics and Analysis. Web. 18 June 2010. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/ consump.html>. "Battery-Electric Vehicles." Clean Vehicles. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2010. Web. 18 June 2010. <http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_vehicles/technologies_and_fuels/ hybrid_fuelcell_and_electric_vehicles/battery-electric-vehicles.html>. Bisignani, G. "Environment." International Air Transport Association. IATA, 2010. Web. 18 June 2010. <http://www.iata.org/whatwedo/environment/Pages/index.aspx Black & Veatch. 20% Wind Energy Penetration in the United States: A Technical Analysis of the Energy Resource. Walnut Creek, CA: 2007. Print. Butler, Rhett A. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions Charts." Rainforests. Mongabay.com, 9 Jan. 2006. Web. 18 June 2010. <http://rainforests.mongabay.com/09carbon_emissions.htm>. California Commissioning Collaborative. Web. 16 June 2010. http://www.cacx.org/ "CIA - The World Factbook." Welcome to the CIA Web Site Central Intelligence Agency. Web. 18 June 2010. <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld-factbook/geos/us.html>. Coal Data, Reports, Analyses, and Surveys. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2008. Web. 16 June 2010 <http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelcoal.html>. Cochran, Thomas, et. al. "Fast Breeder Reactor Programs:." International Panel on Fissile Materials. International Panel on Fissile Materials, Feb 2010. Web. 18 Jun 2010. <http://www.ipfmlibrary.org/rr08.pdf >. "COMMITTEE JURISDICTION." U. S. House of Representatives: Committee on Appropriations. Web. 20 June 2010. <http://appropriations.house.gov/ index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=96&Itemid=33>. "Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) as a Transportation Fuel." Consumer Energy Center - Information for the Consumer about Saving Energy from the California Energy Commission. Web. 21 June 2010. <http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/
50
51
52
53
54
55
Acknowledgements
Participating Schools
The National summit is a signature event offered to member schools from the National Consortium for Specialized Schools of Mathematics Science and Technology (NCSSSMST). Schools attending the 2010 National Youth Policy Summit are:
Conroe ISD Academy of Science and Technology The Woodlands, TX Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy Aurora, IL Arkansas School for Mathematics, Sciences and the Arts Hot Springs, AR Liberal Arts and Science Academy Austin, TX Alabama School of Fine Arts Birmingham, AL Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology Alexandria, VA Rockdale Magnet School for Science and Technology Conyers, GA Crooms Academy of Information Technology Sanford, FL Science and Mathematics Academy at Aberdeen Aberdeen, MD Gatton Academy of Mathematics and Science Bowling Green, KY
56
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Edison Electric Institute Schlumberger Carbon Services U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Expert Panelists Thank you to the following individuals for sharing their expertise and technical knowledge by serving on the expert panel: Mathias Bell Rocky Mountain Institute Lowrey Brown Western Resource Advocates Dan Gibbs Colorado State Senate Alice Madden Colorado Governor's Energy Office Scott Moore Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Robi Robichaud National Renewable Energy Laboratory Wayne Rowe Schlumberger Carbon Services Partners The National Consortium for Specialized Secondary Schools of Mathematics, Science, and Technology
The National Consortium for Specialized Secondary Schools of Mathematics, Science and Technology has been a partner of the National Youth Policy Summit program since 2004. The Consortium is the nation's foremost alliance of schools dedicated to transforming mathematics, science, and technology education to create synergies among schools engaged in educational innovation by shaping national policy, fostering collaboration, and developing, testing, implementing and disseminating exemplary programs. The Consortium w as established in 1988 to provide a forum for schools to exchange information and program ideas and to evolve alliances betw een them. For more information, visit www.ncsssmst.org.
57
970-513-5824