i>-

: !<
' /
.._ ._1[ _;_
7"".C.,._:,<,_.
L J
::? ::{.:",'?i"! ....- >- .,. ,.i . E .: . '
., ....... A.
SEATTLE .. IIVASU'NCTON
,:.... .... D2-6027- "
BRIEFING MATERIAL FROM THE
PRESENTATION ON DYNA SOAR
-- _:.
___._
TO THE
AIR FORCE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD
MARCH 29, 1960 AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
/ / ..... ..:.,fill ,0 ......s_ .- .... __,
i = "": ..........
D2 -602 7-2
D2-6027-2
'
D2:-6027-2
BRIEFI NG MATERIAL FROM THE
PRESENTATION ON DYNA SOAR
TO THE
AIR FORCE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD
MARCH 29! 1960 AT SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
REVISIONS
P_ag__
t
18
24
36
Date
4-15-60
wv
|t
ADDITIONS
ii
101
thru
114
Date
4-15-60
_t
tt 6
?t
%
'!iii_iiii
iil _ /_
D2-6027-2
REVISIONS ADDITIONS
P a ~ Date P a ~
Date
-
i 4-15-60 ii 4-15-60
18
"
101
"
24
"
thru
It.
36
"
114
"
j
D2-6027-2
INTRODUCTION
This document, D2-6027-2 contains copies of briefing material used by Boeing
Airplane Company in its presentation to the Aero-Space Vehicles Panel of Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board on March 29 and 30, 1960 at Seattle, Washington. Also
included is booster data presented by the Martin Co. Material from presentations
by the Air Force and NASA on March 28, 1960 are included in D2-6027-_.
:_i::_i::ii_i I :_
D2-6027-2
REVISED 4-15-60
INTRODUCTION
This document, D2-6027-2 contains copies of briefing material used by Boeing
Airplane Company in its presentation to the Aero-Space Vehicles Panel of Air Force
Scientific Advisory Board on March 29 and 30, 1960 at Seattle, Washington. Also
included is booster data presented by the Martin Co. Material from presentations
by the Air Force and NASA on March 28, 1960 are included in D2 -6027 -l.
D2-6027-2 i
REVISED 4-15-60
iil _'
TABLE OF CONTENTS
la
If.
III.
Vo
INTRODUCTION
E NGINEER FOUNDATION
THE MORE CRITICAL
TECHNICAL AREAS
TECHNICAL PROGRAM
SUMMARY
KEY TECHNICAL AREAS
INDEX
G.H. STONER
J.H. C_LDIE
J. LESKO
H.W. KLOPFENSTEIN
G.H. STONER
A.H. LEE
J.L. POWE LL - MARTIN COo
H.W. KLOPFENSTEIN
J.Fo MILTON
SUDE NUMBERS BY PAGE
26
38
54
65
83
85
104
109
D2-6027-2
il
TABLE 0 F CONTENTS
Eage
1. INTRODUCTION G.H. STONER 1
II. E NGlNEER FOUNDATION J .H. GOLDIE 5
Ill. THE MORE CRITICAL J. LESKO 26
TECHNICAL AREAS H. W. KLOPFENSTEIN 38
IV. TECHNICAL PROGRAM G.H. STONER 54
SUMMARY
V. KEY TECHNICAL AREAS A.H. LEE 65
J. L. POWE LL - MARTIN CO. 83
H. W. KLOPFENSTEIN 85
J.F. MILTON 104
VI. INDEX SLIDE NUMBERS BY PAGE
109
D2-6027-2
11
:r
STONER
D2-6027-2
G.H. STONER
D2-6027-2 1
i
i
i
_
i
i
i
i
i
i
_
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
_
i
_
i
_
i
_
i
l
i
!
i
i
i
i
i
i
l
i
!
i
i
!
!
_
,
_
,
_
,
'
_
_
i
i
!
i
_
i
_
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
!
i
!
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
f
f
_
:_
:
_
?
_
,:_
:_
._
,,:,_
_
_
._
.....
m t
,
.
m
Z I
l
l
Z
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
t:1
t-:>
I
0')
o
t-:>
~
I
t-:>
t-:>
BOEING PRESENTATIONS
ENGINEERING FOUNDATION
~ THE MORE CR ITICAl TECHN ICAl AREAS
TECHNICAL PROGRAM SUMMARY
i
i
i
i
:
i
i
i
i
i
i
!
i
!
i
l
i
_
i
i
i
_
i
l
i
!
i
i
i
i
!
i
i
i
i
i
!
:
i
?
:
,

Z
.
0
R I
-
-
Z h
h
l
I
.
L
.
i
I
,
-
,
,
t
,
I
,
,
i
l
0
i
.
1
.
.
i
D
_
F
.
.
-
Z 0
Z O
:
:
:
:
O
.
-
_
1
:
:
:
z
_
.
J
L
_
0
a
:
:
_

:
_
P
.
-
d
:
:
_
c
:
_
-
-
.
J
L
.
L
,
I
L
.
I
.
J
_
.

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
~
I
~
t-:>
-:]
I
t-:>
c,.,
L-. _. _ _ __
COMPARATIVE STUDY PRESENTATIONS
PRESENTATION TfTlE
A. RE-ENTRY VEHICLE
1. COMPARATfVE CONFIGURATION SUMMARY
2 AVCO DRAG BRAKE
3 McDONNEl MOD IFIED MERCURY
4. LIFTING BODY M-l
5. LIFTING BODY M-2b
6 GLIDER LID 1.5 (CVA)
7. GLI DER LID 2 2
8. GLIDER LID 3.0 (BELL)
9. INFLATABLE GLIDER (GOODYEAR)
10 FOLDING WING GLIDER (LOCKHEED)
11 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMPARISON
B. BOOSTERS
1 BOOSTER PARAMETRIC STUDIES
2 TITAN COMPARATIVE DATA
3 BOOSTER DESIGN REFINEMENT
SPEAKER
J - MILTON
D. DOUGLASS
D. DOUGLASS
R. SIMONDS
R. SIMONDS
M. BERRY
M. BERRY
M. BERRY
R. HARPER
R. HARPER
F McRAE
G. LEDBETTER
G. LEDBEnER
J. MILTON
I
_____ J
W V _ 1 9 0 _ I d _ I V O S V N A G
I - d 3 1 S _ V O S V N J k C l
I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O 1 3 ' a 3 a 3 A O : : ) S l C l _ W V _ l O o a a 3 a N V O l n o _
- - . . . . . . . . . . . . . x a n a a 3 w - " ] _ ' I V N l W a 3 1 1 S l O W _ " { ' - "
' _ ' i a _ - - L S - O _
I V I I 8 _ I 0
' _ I - 3 A n _ N V W A _ I I N 3 3 _
3 1 N O S _ 1 3 c l , b _
' _ ) - N I G N _
: ! : i i i i : i ! i i i
i i l i i _ i i . . . . .
I
c _
I
~
I
O':l
o
t:-:)
...;J
I
t:-:)
~
PILOTED, LANDING,
HYPERSONIC
RE-ENTRY MANEUVER,
ORB ITAL
BOOST & FLI GHT,
L X-I5 ~ I . . BMD/STL TERMINAL + MERCURY
r-- GUIDANCE PROGRAM DISCOVERER, ETC.
I. DYNA SOAR STEP - I ~ I
1
I" DYNA SOAR PROGRAM ..
J.H_. GOLDIE
T D2-6027-2 5
J.H. GOLDIE
D2-6027-2 iiiiSifiiiT
5
[ 9 6 !
0 9 6 I
N O I I A I O A ] N O I . L V _ ( I 9 1 _ N O D
6 S 6 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
e _
I
|
I I
I I I
1 9 6 1 0 9 6 l 6 S 6 1
i

i
t t r
I
N O l l n l O A 3
. "

/ '
; " 1

V
. . .


V



,
I - -
m
L
f
_
0
z
z
Z m
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
7
~
~
~
1
~
....
DESIGN OBJECTIVES
MARCH, 1958
CONCEPTUAL GLI DER DEVELOPMENT -
S IGNIFICANTL Y ADVANC ING TECHNOLOGY
SUBSEQUENT MILITARY APPLICATION
DEMONSTRATING MANNED FLIGHT
HYPERS ON I C BOOST GLI DE
ORBIT
RE-ENTRY
CONVENTIONAL LANDING
(
!
!
"
_
F
Z 0
c
_
c
_
)
q
,
n
-
I
-
N
-
1
-
.
.
.
1
Z
D
Z
_
.
.
_
.
I
I
'
I
,
,
0
0
z
l
.
,
_
i
#
.
_
o
o
Z
_
.
_
.
_
_
.
"
_
_
z
I
=
_
L
.
L
c
z
_
z m .
.
_
J
_
.
.
I
m l
-
-
z l
.
,
i
.
l
I
-
-
0 0
_
l
-
-
-
I ,
.
.
.
I
i
t
_
0 0

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
8
~
I
en
o
t.:)
-.:J
I
t.:)
00
1-
DESIGN APPROACH
MARCH,1958
SMALL SIZE & WEIGHT
RANGE IIONCE-AROUND"
VERSATILE PAYLOAD BAY
SIMPLE PAS S IVE S TRUCTUR E
MANEUVERABLE IN GlI DING Fli GHT
RELIABLE AND SAFE
MILITARY POTENTIAL
ICBM BOOSTERS
l
N I _ " 1 _ O I
N O l / V I l I I g I : I N 0 3 I V S O d O I I d
!
o
|
o
f

. N I 0 1
- - - - - - . . t . . . . . - . . " N I 8 . 9 I
8 S , e H Y W N O I . l Y H n 9 I : 1 N O ) l Y S O d O H d
i
....
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
1
0
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2

1
0

m
L
_
L
_
Z
o
m
|
k
-
-
Q
.
.
L
_
O o
O
o
,
,
0 Z m

>
-
I
-
-
m m m
j
-
-
>
-
.
>
-
m
z 0
2
1
2
0
0
m m t
-
-
Z m
0
Z 0 0
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
-
2
1
1
~
I
0')
o
~
-:J
I
~
.....
.....
DESIGN OBJECTIVES
DECEMBER, 1958
SAME AS IN MARCH, 1958, EXCEPT-
DEMONSTRATE MILITARY SUBSYSTEM FEAS I B ILiTY
CONDUCT SC (ENTIFrC RESEARCH
I
I
-
-
-
Q
_
{
_
)
o
O
P
.
.
.
M
E
_
< L
_
<
I
z
0
z
Z
Z
-
-
_
z
O
_
z
_
0
z
_
_
_
z
_
Z
O
_
<
a
J
<
_
X
0
_
_

0 Z 0 c
J
0 _
J
m w < Z
m

z m .
.
J
<
|
Z 0 <
!
L
L
J
c
J
m
C
D
Z
< 0

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
1
2
~
I
en
o
r:"
-;r
r:"
~
DESIGN APPROACH
DECEMBER, 1958
SAME AS MARCH 1958, EXCEPT-
"GO-AROUND" LANDING ENGINE FOR A IRLAUNCH
GOOD LANDING WITHOUT ENGINES
ESCAPE THROUGHOUT FlfGHT ENVELOPE
REDUNDANCY FOR ADDED SAFETY
3-AXIS - FULLTIME - STABrllTY AUGMENTATION
. INTEGRATED P I LOT CONTROL
RANGE "TWI CE-AROUND" - ALTITUDE 300 N M
L_
|
O_
L_
!
DEI CONFIGURATIONDEC. '58
-18FT. 7.5 IN.-.--_
_ 81No
. t_
DEI CONFIGURATION DEC. '58
5
|
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
1
4

E
:
C
"
I
S
T

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2

m

1
4

_
i
_
i

i
Z O
m
Z
a
-
m
Z
_
_
z
D
_
-
m D
_
Z m
-
-
J
Z
m
c
y
o
m m
X
Z
_
.
_
Z
o
o
"
-
J
-
_
m
_
o
@
Z
Z D i
,
I
D _
_
J
@
O m
J
D
-
D
Z
I

D k
Z
k
O i
l
l
Q
D
Z D
@
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
1
5
a
I
Q)
o
t-'
~
t-'
....
en
DESIGN APPROACH
APRIL, 1959
SAME AS DECEMBER 1958 EXCEPT
14,000 FT. MIN. BETWEEN MAX LID EQUILIBRIUM AND
MAX LID HEAT LIMIT. ( 6 0 0 0 ~ F T . MIN 0 IN TURN)
2500 N oM. LATERAL TURN CAPAB rLilY
LIMITED REDUNDANCY
500-LB 0 MINIMUM PAYLOAD
AIR LAUNCH TO MACH. 1.5 MINIMUM
!
!
SSI CONFIGURATION APR. '59
I 18 FT.7.2 IN.-................ ,,'-
__
6FT. 2IN.
34 FT. 7.5 IN,
I
. ._ . ........ ___
55 I CONFIGURATION APR. '59
i-I8 FT. 7.2 IN.
1
---1-"--
~ - ~ - - - 34 FT. 7.5 IN -, --.. - - ~
I
6 FT. 2 IN.
i
l i i i _ o
!
L _ D
C _
!
r
Z O
_
!
I
0
t
r
_
o o o O
A b a
.
.
h
n
.
_
J
m
m
m
B
Z
r
r
_
L
a
J
.
.
_
D
-
-
-
-
_
z
L
J
_
_
Z
O
c
_ 1
|
I
_
-
-
-
Z
0
_
.
1
Z
0
_
0
@

0
m
X
Z
0
,
-
-
I
-
-
i
_
Z
X
5
.
.
_
0
Z Z 0 0 .
.
.
1
m t
-
-
-
m

Z
Z
.
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
.
Z
:
Z
)
0
_
_
m
Z
Z
o
(
.
:
O
"
'
_
N
,
_
z
'
.
.
,
-
.
'
0
Z
_ 0
_
"
1
m
m

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
_
1
_
"
_
-
_
-
-

1
....
1
8
R
E
V
I
S
E
D
4
-
1
5
-
6
0
~
t,1'j
<
....
C'Il
t,1'j
t:='
~
I
I-"
C1I
I
t:='
~
I
CJ)
o
~
....:t
I
~
CJ) I-"
o 00
......
a::
It')
-0
I
().
-
~
co
N









PAYLOAD -
BOOSTER -
VELOCITY -
LANDING -
LATERAL RANGE -
DESIG"'PROACH
MID-MARCH, 1960
1000# & 75 CU. FT.
MODIFIED TITAN ICBM (STEP J)
ORB rTAl CAPAB fUlY
TANGENTrAl
2000 NA UT. M I. (M IN. )
FUGHT CORRIDOR -
30 ,000 FT. (M IN.) C L MAX TO LID MAX
GLfDER LlFE - 4 Fll G HTS (M IN. )
STAB ILITV - fNHERENT- LAUNCH TO LANDfNG
REL I A B I l f TV - REDUNDANCY OF CRI TI CAL COMPONENTS
!
!
iii !
CURRENTCONFIGURATIONMAR. '60
/
/
/
/
CURRENT CONFIGURATION MAR. '60
1-+-------34 FT 8 I N - - ~
% Z F
_
Z Z
V
o
z

v

~

r
-
.

-
N
O

V
1

- V
l

"

~

'
"
'
0

V
l

.
"

S
c
l
.
z
m
z
Z m
Z m

6
o Z
Z
.
.
J
Z 0
"
-
o
o
_
.
.
z
_
I
.
J
.
.
I
L
.
_
:
:
:
3
Z 0 m Z m
l
o o
o m
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
S
I
0':1
o
t\j
...::J
I
t\j
t\j
I-'
REFINEMENT WITHIN CURRENT DESIGN APPROACH
ANALVS IS & TESTING OF:
MATERIALS
STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
AEROTHERMODYNAM r CS
(J)
STAB tllTY & CONTROL
PERFORMANCE
WEIGHTS
SUBSYSTEMS
BOOSTER - GLIDER INTEGRATION
DYNAM I CS & LOADS
_
.
j
>
_
o
0
I
Z
_
I
0
<
_
z
_
0
Z
i
,
m
:
:
:
}
o
_
_
z
_
_
_
_
o
z i
-
-
_
1
z 0
z r
_
Q
_
Z 0 0
I 0 .
_
1
I
-
-
-
z 0 z z h z 2
_

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
2
2
~
I
~
t..:l
....:a
I
t..:l
t..:l
t..:l
PHASE ALPHA COMPARATIVE STUDY IDEAS
THIN GAGE MATERIAL APPLICATION (LOCKHEED)
SMALL DIA 0 NOSE & LEADING EDGE (BELl)
COOLED STRUCTURE CONCEPT (BELL & eVA)
FOAMED SiliCON CARBrDE rNSULATION APPl. (MARTIN)
TEMPERATURE"" RATE SENS rNG GUIDANCE CONCEPT (LOCKHEED)
S
I
0')
o
~
..;J
I
~
~
c.1
REEVALUATION OF DESIGN APPROACH
COST
WEIGHT
TECH. RISK
ESCAPE SYSTEM DES IGN
WErGHT
TECHNICAL RIS K
PAYLOAD
STAB rurv DURING BOOST
ALTERNATE MATERIALS
STRUCTURAL FACTORS
LATERAL RANGE
CORR' DOR DEPTH
ALTERNATE MATERIALS
m,.
I
!
I
i
b_
0
GO AHEAD
REFINEMENTWITHIN " _" ,
o s,om
O
Q
RE-EVALUATI ONOF
DESIGN APPROAC
LATERALRANGE
PHASE _
COMPARATIVE'_ CORRIDOR DEPTH __
STUDY IDEAS ESCAPESYSTEMDES._,,i__________
PAYLOAD
STABILITY DU
COOLEDSTRUCT. CONCEPT _'"__H._.. .....
CONFIGURATION VARIATION';"___
......
~
N
GO AHEAD
REFINEMENTWITHIN ~
CURRENT __ -_ (
DESIGN APPROACH _____________ ~ 1
RE-EVALUATION OF
DES IGN APPROACH
PHASE eC
COMPARATIVE
STUDY IDEAS
LATERAL RANGE
COOLED STRUCT. CONCEPT
CONFIGURATfON VARIATIONS
Z m o
L
_
8
4
O
0
0
1
"
I
M
H
3
N
n
_
"
(
]
'
B
_
]
e
,
,
-
_
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
2
5
Q

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

~

c

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
J

V
.

0

>

u
.

l
-
N

:
:
c

C

-
c
.
!
)

.
.
.
.
.
J

- .
.
.
.

3
t

l
-
V
.

0

0

m

-
8
1

D
O
O
I

"
1
M

H
:
)
N
n
V
l

.

0
'

3
c

~

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2

2
5

J. LESKO
D2-6027-2 26
J. LESKO
D2-6027-2 26
Z W
w
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
o
o
o
o
_
a
a
a
_
o
J
_
_
0
0
l
+
+
+
+
+
+
_
-
w
_
-
o
o
_
A
_
-
b
L
_
<
+
I
!
>
=
_
-
%
I
w
6
A
!
+
,
I
+
ii
iI
:+
W
>
_
+
W
_
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
+
2
2
7
S
I

I:\:)
"'l
I
I:\:)
I:\:)
"'l
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT
DESIGN DATA
DESIGN FLIGHT GROSS WEIGHT -------
DESIGN LANDING GROSS WE1GHT -- -----
TOTAL LIFTING SURFACE AREA - -- ---
STABILIZING (TIP FIN) SURFACE AREA- - - --
ELEVON SURFACE AREA
RUDDER SURFACE AREA --- _. - - -.- ---
6
i1
1
1 41
26
11

I II)
I __
236
11

73
9283 LBS.
8892 LBS.
330 sa. FEET
31.0 sa FEET
34 sa FEET
9.35 sa FEET
TYP AFT BODY SECT
9 :::61Jr.
5IO
u ill U
7.5R / 1 SIDE VIEW I REAR VIEW FRONT VIEW
339
11

1
.
1
.
1
0 .
.
_
1
U
.
I
> Z W I
-
-
I .
_
i
I
.
I
.
.
0 0
,
;
o
J
l
i
Z _
.
1
m L
I
J
0 >
-
.
g
l
.
.
I
> 0
L
I
.
t
\
\
\
t
-
-
\
0
\
0
\
_
.
1
\
w
\
>
0
0
0
0
L
_
O
F
-
D
_
-
F
-
O
-
-
0
_
-
0
_
D
-
-
<
%
0 0 0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
.
o
L
L
.
O
J
O
0 0
U
"
)
>
-
-
-
h
"
0 0
0
w
-
-
>
W >
_
J
W
0
D
2
-
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
2
8

I
0')
o
1:1:)
"t'
1:1:)
1:1:)
00
FLIGHT ENVELOPE
W/
S
=.29.0
4001- RECOVERY CEILING V
CL MAX. EQUILIBRIUM GLIDE
ALTITUDE I
1000 FT LID MAX. EQUILIBRIUM GLIDE
MINIMUM FLIGHT ALT.
-
,
I
I
1-
-'
-- 1
200 _...... I
-
-
-
-
,.,

1
I
I
I
100 / /_ ...... - SATELLITE
L
____ ____ ______ ____ __
50 '
o 5 10 15 20 25
RELATIVE VELOCITY-IOOO FPS

i
c_
o
|
L'_
r.O
LIFT COEFFICIENTCORRELATION
M = 8.08
o0
CL
.8
BOEING THEORY
O0 o
0 10 2O 30 4O 50 60
0 EXPERIMENT
o: .=DEG
.8
.6
.4
.2
LIFT COEFFICIENT CORRELATION
Moo = 8.08
BOEING THEORY-
o EX PER I MENT
Moq = 8.08
o ~ - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - -
o 10 20 30 40 50 60
oc= DEG
U
I
I
o
CL
LIFT COEFFICIENT
2O
CORRELATION
_--FORCE DATA
l NTEGRATEDPRESSURE
" BOEINGTHEORY
I0 2O
DEG
30 4O 5O
DATA
a
I
Q')
0
t-:l
-::J
I
LIFT COEFFICIENT CORRELATION
t-:l
.7
M ::: 20
.6 ?

.5
DATA
.4
/.1 .. ... INTEGRATED PRESSURE DATA
'// BOEING THEORY
C
L .3

'/
:;(/
.2
,'/


.1
0
20 30 40 50
-.1
ex: - DEG

I
Lx_
!
L/D CORRELATIONM=8
IN AIR
4
3
2
0
AEDC B-2 M 8 JULY, 1959
,.
0 .I .2 .3 .4 ,5 .6 .7
CL
LID CORRELATION M=8 IN AIR
e AEDCB-2 M 8 JULY, 1959
4
c
-
-J
3
0
BAC MODEL 814-1050
LL.I
:if
:E
-
2 a:::
......
1 BAC PREDICTION
b_
I
C)
bO
,,-,1
I
rl
L'_
L/D CORRELATIONM-17.6 IN AIR
(OBTAINED DUR ING PHAS E ALPHA AT GE SHOCK TUNNEL)
L
w
D
M - 17.6 R - .3Ro 13
...... .......:.... .......... _,=
Re - 105
A
0
o _
A _
BAC PRED ICTION
0 I0 20 30 40
oe-.DEGREES
FLAT BOTTOM
CONICAL
BOTTOM
2.0
1.5
LID CORRELATION M=17.6 IN AIR
(OBTA I NED OUR I NG PHASE ALPHA AT GE SHOCK TUNNEU
o ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ___
o 10 20 30 40 50
Q- DEGREES
O
_
g
o
g
-
.
_
o
m
w
:
-
4
:
_
r
-
m
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
r
"
m
_
< m <
m o
0 m .
4
1
0 0 O
_
0
1
o
m 4
_
4
_
0
r
-
0
0
e
(
I
s
|
|
I
|
0
0
e 0
E Z m C
< m 0 0
0 (
7
)
a
I
m
o
1:'1:)
..;J
I
1:'1:)
c,.:)
c,.:)
AVAILABLE.
ALTITUDE
CORRIDOR
"'1000 FT.
MANEUVER CORRIDORS
W/S=29.0
IJ = 0
= 0
60
I
50 ~ CL=O.45
0.69
I
40
30
0.144
20
10
O ~ [ - - ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ - - ~
o 5 10 15 20 25
RELATIVE VELOCITY"""IOOO FPS
_
=
_
=
=
m i
=
=
=
_
m Z
O a
=
Z
O
C
)
C
_
O C
3
L
4
J
z
_
_
=
<
=
_
_
u
w
_
"

I
I
(
3
.
)
r
_
C
)
0
r
.
_
,
,
.
-
.
(
.
_
i
.
_
.
I
-
I
-
I

A 0
m L
.
_
L
.
_
:
:
Z
:
:
a
_
Z
Q
o
!
k
_
C
_
o
I
e
!
0
e
|
C
_
o
|
C
:
3
E
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
3
4

I



I

C.:l

C
N
.2
eOI 00
HYPERSONIC STABILITY DATA
M = 8.08

/-1' .,..
/ PREDICTED
/(PHASE I METHOD)
AEDC B-2 TUNNEL
MOD 0 PHASE I MODEL
s.e =
S
o \ I

REF.
c:==/ .71
+ APRil 59 TEST PERIOD
JULY 59 TEST PERIOD } 6
e
= 0
c FEB 60 PHASE a PERIOD
-.02 . -.03 -.04 -.05 -.06
C
m
.63 CR
I
c)
!
MISSION
ONCE-AROUND
PROFILE
TO EDWARDS
AFB
500
400
ALT ..300
lO00 FT.
2O0
I00
0
0
29
' ' _40 , _
I 0 60 CL='45
/ _._\7 o __0
B BO _ [90
TIME _ M IN.UTES
i00 J_
2 4 6 8 IO 12 14 16 18 20
RANGE -_ I000 NAUTICAL MILES
500
400
A _300
J 000 FT.
00
100
MISSION PROFILE
ONCE-AROUND TO -EDWARDS AFB
BBO
IME -- M INUT S
C =.45
o ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - ~ - - ~
o I 12 14 I
R N E- 1000 NAUTICAL MILES
I
MANEUVER ENVELOPE
INITIAL VEL -24000 FPS
FIN AL VEL - 800 FPS
I
!
RAN GE NORMAL
TO LAUNCH
DIR.- I000 N.M.
4
2
0
2
4
RANGE IN
START i-- - -- - - .._
-- -- I I " " LAUNCH DIRECTION
MA/NEUVER f ___'_',-iO00N.M.
!_
CLMA X / _ _ /
LL, "/"
ENVE
ENVELOPE
''L/D MAX ENVELOPE TURBULENT FLOW
LAMINAR FLOW
4
MANEUVER ENVELOPE
INITIAL VEL.=24000 FPS
FIN AL VEL.= 800 FPS
START ,,- _ _ _ _ RANGE IN
2 MANEUVER - - LAUNCH DIRECTION
RANGE NORMAL / " -IOOON.M.
TO LAUNCH 0 \
DI R. _ 1000 N.M. 16
2 CLMAX
ENVELOPE
-- ! - - -
4
//
LID MAX ENVELOPE
LAMINAR FLOW
L D MAX ENVELOPE
TURBULENT FLOW
Z m Q Z Q i Q Z
m
Z
0
0
_
,,r
,,
i
6
Q
.
)
-
-
-
-
_
,
_
)
_
-
0
C
2
2
_
0 0 c
_
.
0
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
3
7
~
I
m
o
I:\:)
-:J
I
I:\:)
c.:I
-:J
LANDING COMPARISON LOW LID AIRPLANES
rlORfZONTAL VELOCITr
o
I
(l
100 200
I I
100 200 300 400
300
I
500
400 KNOTS
I
600 FPS
o r-- Ii
100 --
""
20u .-
VER11 CAL
VELOC I 1'1 - F PS
300
400
I
H.W. KLOPFENSTEIN
D2-6027-2
38
1"
SI!8 '
H. W. KLOPFENSTEIN
D2-6027-2
38
I
I
CRITICAL POINTS
A
O A NOSESTAGNATION REGION
O B -_NOSECAP SKI RT
0 C - LEADING EDGESTAGNATIONLINE
A
CRITICAL POINTS
A - NOSE STAGNATION REGION
B - NOSECAP SKI RT
C ~ LEADING EDGE STAGNATION LINE
|
o
I
300
250
0
8
M
150
100
50
L/D MAXRE-ENTRY
TYPICAL TEMPERATURES
NOSE CAP PT
NOSE SKI RT LWRo SURFo
W! NG LDGo EDGE
= 45
(A)3630F
(A}3315F (B)2140
(B)2050 (C)2280
(C)209O
./
(A)3530F
(B) 1860
(C)2170
NOSE STAG
POINT
MINIMUM FLIGHT
LIMITS FOR L/D MAX
5 SIDESLIP
W/S = 29
ALLOWABLE TEMPERATURES
NOSE CAP : 4300
OTHER . 2700
0
0 5 " I0 15 20 25
RELATIVE VELOCITY--- I000FPS
t3
I;\;)
I
0')
0
LID MAX RE-ENTRY
I;\;)
-:)
I
I;\;)
(A) 353OF
300
(B) 1860
TYPICAL TEMPERATURES (A) 3630F (C) 2170
NOSE CAP PT (A) 3315F (8) 2140
t..
N\)
250
NOSE SKIRT LWR. SURF.
(B) 2050
(C) 2280
'N \ ;-____ ...
WING LOG. EDGE
(C) 2090

,
.

."".
r--
200
STAG
w....
0
/' /' POINT
8
t'"""'4
4> :: 0-
MINIMUM FLIGHT
I 150
\.d..I
/ LIM ITS FOR LID MAX
0
::l
......
5 SIDESLIP
r--
100
.....J

W/S= 29
50
'V ALLOWABLE TEMPERATURES
NOS E CAP: 4300
OTHER 2700
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
RELATIVE VELOCrTY-lOOO FPS
|
!
b_
!
::3
D
200
150
tO0
0
0
C L MAX
RE-ENTRY
TYP.ICALTEMPERATURES
NOSE CAP PTA2700F
NOSE SKIRT B 2
VENTRALLDGo EDGE
A
B 239O
C 2280
URBULENT
F
B
C
2850F
2260
2080
LWRSURFACE- NOSESKIRT
PT" B" LAMI NAR
MINIMUM FLIGHT
LIMITS FORCLMAX
W/S 29
ALLOWABLETEMPERATURES
NOSECAP : 4300
OTHER : 2700
5 " I0 15 20. 25
RELATIVEVELOCITY _ 1000FPS
C L MAX REENTRY
250
2850F
2260
I--
2080
u...

200
lWR SURFACE - NOSE SKIRT
,.....
PT "B" LAMINAR
I.J.J
c
MIN IMUM FLIGHT
::::;)
......
LIMITS FOR CLMAX
......
~ 150
<C
W/S 29
ALLOWABLE TEMPERATURES
100
NOS E CA P : 4300
OTHER : 270Ct
0
0 5
- 10
15 20 25
RELATIVE VELOCITY - 1000 FPS
~
I-'
Z O
m
A
r
.
D
_
=
N o
O
O
/
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
4
2
~
I
O':l
o
~
-:J
I
t.:l
~
BOTTOM SURFACE
(EQUILIBRIUM GLIDE)
C l FOR LID MAX REENTRY
ALT 207,000 FT.
ANGLE OF A TrACK 14
VELOCITY 18,700 FPS
111=0
0
fJ=O
2390
0
F
ISOTHERMS
C L MAX REENTRY
ALT 246,000 FT.
ANGLE OF A TrACK 51
0
b_
|
b_
UPPER SURFACE ISOTHERMS
(EQUILIBRIUMGLIDE)
o
VELOCITY 18,700FPS
0 0 0
O0F
2100F
900F
WING L.Eo2280 F
STAGNATION POINT
3630F
APPROXo
APPROX. 1500F
Wi NG LoE. 2190F
DORSAL L.E.
F
/_APPROX.
950Fv_,
I(_F
1700F //_F
TIP FIN VENTRAL
L.E. 2280F
500F_
450_
,;o00/, X _ ,
900_
NOSE STAGNATION POINT
2990F
C L FOR (L/D) MAX RI-|NTRY
ALTITUDE 207,000 FT.
ANGLE OF ATTACK 14
C L MAX RE-ENTRY
ALTITUDE 246,000FT.
ANGLE OF ATTACK 51
1--------
UPPER
VELOC I TY 18, 700FPS
o 0 0
(L FOR (LID) MAX REENTRY
ALTITUDE 207,000 Ff.
ANGLE OF ATTACK 14
SURFACE ISOTHERMS
(EQUILIBRIUM GLIDE)
L NOSE STAGNATION POINT
2990F
C L MAX IEENTRY
ALTITUDE 246,000 FT.
ANGLE OF A TrACK 51
Ix:
I
!
L_J
I00
75
5O
TRANSITION LOCATION
(RADIATION EQUILIBRIUM)
= 27,000 FT
FOREQUILBRI UM= . 845
25
0
ALT= 21g,o00FT
LAMINAR
EQUILIBRIUM
GLI DE ALT. 246,000 FT
1 2 3
WORST
TRANSITION CASE
4 5 6 7 8
TURBULENT
DISTANCE, -- S
(IT,)
150
100
25
EFFECT OF TRANSITION LOCATION
a = 50
0
........ - CAPABilITY
VR = 18,700 FPS
( RADIATION EQUILIBRIUM)
{
A h :: 27, 000 FT
A 11 FOR EQUIlBRIUM= .845
G RA P H ITE
ZIRCONIUM MOLY
RODS r
a"c:::::S
Voo NOSE CAP
-AlT= 219,000 FT
...... WORST
fTION CAS E
__ LAMINAR _.....r

GLIDE ALT. 246,000 FT
DISTANCE, - S (FT.)
Z i
.
=
L
J
Z
A
0
I
c
_
O
0

c
r
_
o
_
c
_
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
!
!
4
5

I

t-:I
...
t-:I
q
qTH

NOSE SKIRT HEAT TRANSFER
2 .. -----",----..
.-.......... -----

I 0
- ,
'"
9
8
7
6
5
4

DATA:

3
D
o
o
D
o HEMISPHERE, SHOCK TUBE
.....

S b..
.AD
()
c HEMISPHERE-CONE, PfBAL H.W.T

<J.
D
c a =20.5 a =41 5} BLUNT DELTA WING NASA LRC
4 a =36.5 '-. 11" HWT 1\
2 I "" ,
o 1 2 3 4
SIR
5 6 7 8
!
I
,
I
I I I
Z
_
D
I
F
-
-
_
L
L
.
_
_
Z
<
_
(
-
_
_
"
)

-
-
_
,
_
Z
I
-
-
-
-
0
0
_
I
Z
Z
.
.
.
_
_
'
_
Z h _
.
J
r
'
h
.
.
.
.
J
F
-
.
o
o
b
-
-
C
Z
_
I
0
O
Z
O
_
7
_
_
.
a
m
_
(
Z
)
-
-
L
x
_
(
_
3
_
'
-
_
-
-
b
4
_
c
.
_
Z
.
.
.
j
=
=
3
0
I
.
.
_
_
-
-
Z
I
-
-
F
-
.
-
-
,
,
_
_
q
Z
_
Z
-
-
-
-
_
,
.
)
-
-
b
r
_
_
Z
_
'
_
|
_
,
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
r
_
o
_
J
D Z
_
>
-
-
_
_
-
'
_
-
-
-
'
_
D
m
o
Z
O
0
_
_
.
_
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
4
6
~
I
0)
o
t..:l
...::J
I
t..:)
~
0)
DESIGN TEMPERATURES & EMISSIVITY OF MATERIALS
MAT'l DES rGN E USAGE
-
TEMP.
Z r RCON fA RODS 4300 .6 NOSE INSERT
MUL TI-LA YER
COATED GRAPHITE 3400 08 NOSE CAP
COATED LEAD I NG EDGE
MOLYBDENUM 2700 09 & HEATS HfELDS
ALUMINA SKIN
FIBERS 3000
-- INSULATION
RENE '41 2000 .9 SKI N PANELS: &
BAS I C STRUCTURE
_ o - 3 H A I V _ 3 d W 3 1
0 0 0 O 0 0 Z 0 0 0 1 0
1 1 _ g ' O _ W f l U 3 f l S A l O W f l 3 1 V O 0 Z - M
W f l l 1 3 H I S 3 1 - 0 3 Z l 0 1 X O
V l V O 1 V 1 3 1 3 _ O N _ _
W f l l l 3 H
I V I S 3 1 % O g " _ I V I S 3 1 - _ 7 -
\ H O _ V 3 S _ ? i _ w o s s I w ? o v _ _ _ , , 2 " -

_ m
0
0 1
r _
<
0
W I I N Z Q 8 A I O W Q : I . I . V O ) t 0 & J . I A I S S I W : Z
L _
I
0
r _
I
t:I
'-'"
I
0)
0
'-'"
-.::J
I
M
EMISSIVITY OF COATED MOLYBDENUM
100 I
<:> T
1
0
BoA oC.
Oe8
'-B eA 0 C 0 EM J S S OMETER SEARCH
~
LIGHT
0
t-
20% TEST A I R u
5% - TES T A I R
006 I.J."
~
I
~ O X I D I Z E D AT 2500
0
F - TEST HEll UM
>
-.
Vl
0.4
Vl
~
~
-
UJ
0&2
NOT OX I D IZED ~ TEST HELl UM
W-2 COATED MOLYBDENUM = 0.5% TI
0
0 1000 2000 3000
TEMPERATURE - of
~
-.::J
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
4
8
~
I
~
~
~
M
~
COATED REFRACTORY METALS
COATED REFRACTORY METALS ARE USED IN TWO APPLICATIONS
LEADING EDGE
STRUCTURE
INSULATION
PROTECTION
LEADING EDGES
~
"------INSULATION
PROTECTION
(LOWER SURFACE)
D2-602 7-2
49
D2-6027-2
49
V
V
, . / A I O W - I I _ "
j -
N O I L V l n S N I
A I O W - l i _ " 0 _ 0 "
3 0 8 3 O N I Q V 3 1 O N I A A
V
V - V _ - - - - - - - - _ _ S R I Q V N N I _ ' L
G 1 3 1
_ . . . . . . . o _ , _ _ , _ _ _ , _ . . , _ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , -
3 S N I
N O l V O n _ o o I _ , 3 N 3 _ - - _ _ 3 / I H d V _ O
N O I L V I f l S N I S N 3 @ I J V N I W N I V - _
I _ I I ) I S _ d V O 3 S O N
V I N O O N I Z
3 1 1 f l l ) f l _ l S I V ) I I I I I ) : I O S N O i l ] 3 S ' S S O _ I )
L e a
i
i
L _
0
|
t;j
r.:>
I
m
<::>
t-:l
=;J
I
t-:l
e.n
o
CROSS .. SECTIONS OF CRITICAL STRUCTURE
NOSE CAP & SKIRT
GRAPHITE w./
ZIRCON fA INS ERT
7 . 5 I N RA 0 IUS - ,
WING LEADING EDGE
.030 . STI-MOLY

'" !
/ I
/' i
/ ,
.,L __
A
B
T ALUMINA FIBERS INSULATION
RENE 141 CORRUGA TlON
.5 TI-MOL Y HEAT S HI ElD

. SKI N V-- _____ J Em_ t:::;: __
RENE '41 .
A7 'C7 '\7"'\ t
B --
ALUM I NA FI BERS
rNS ULATlON
/ .010 RENE '41
. 5 II-MOLY ---"".
..-
/ A
FRAME
-----.--..
B -- B
A
!
..q
!
INSULATEDPANEL DESIGN APPROACH
EROSION SHIELD
2700F MAX
C)
INSULATION
2700F MAX
SUPPORT
2700F MAX
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
2000F MAX
en
.....
INSULATED PANEL DESIGN APPROACH
SUPPORT ---'
2700
0
F MAX
--EROS ION SHIELD
2700
0
F MAX

2700
0
F MAX
PRIMARY STRUCTURE
2000
0
F MAX
b_
I
O
..q
I
b_
O1
NOSECAP TEMPERATURECAPABILITY
250
200
_- BTU/FT2
SEC
150
I00
5O
3OOO
DISTANCE FROMCATHODE 7.5 IN
-#=.9 -#=.7
CML
GLIDE
RE-ENTRY
3500 4000 4500
SURFACETEMPERATURE- OF
5000
STING
I " MODEL NOSE
CAP
......... 22.: I :I: Ik ARC UNIT
( i.
NOSECAP TEMPERATURE CAPABILITY
STING
DISTANCE FROM CATHODE 7.5 IN
250 I
200
i -BTU/FT
2
GL I DE
SEC RE-ENTRY
150
100
5 0 ~ - - - - ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - ~
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
SURFACE TEMPERATURE - of
T
t
_
L
_
C
D
L
_
Z

m c
_
O <
1
:
L
U
2
=

m
b
-
.
c
;
O L
)

v
,
4
L
t
_
Z L
L
m
Z
L
U
L
U
t
i
Z o
_
X
u
J
Z L
L
_
L
)
.
_
J
o
:
2
=
_
O
"
T
"
L
_
_
-
0
"
U
U
Z
_
U
U
Z
Z
_
_
Z
Z
o
0
0
_
_
0
0
O
C
_
0
0
C
_
0
0
_
_
'
_
r
_
Z
|
c
N
Z
c
_
c
N
u
<
[
Z b
.
i
c
N
<
_
Z
|
Z
u
<
;
c
_
Z
o
g
_
Z
<
;
M
_
<
;
O <
2
Z x Z t O k
)
Z b
-
<
:
_
c
<
:

I b
-
)
.
o
c
_
Z _
2
>
.
<
;
O
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
5
3
~
I
8
t>:I
j1
t>:I
01
c.?
SPECIMEN
1-1
1-2
1-3
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
3-1
LEADING EDGE TESTS
UNSTlFFENED MO + 005% Ti SHEET ALLOY
W-2 COATED
MAXIMUM FRONT
TEMPERA TURE TIME RESULTS
2800 22 MIN. UNAFFECTED
2820 18 MIN. UNAFFECTED
3250 22 MIN.
INCIPIENT MELT'G & SMALL HOLE
DUE TO TEMP. QVERSHOOT
2800 6.5 MIN. UNAFFECTED
2850 20MIN. UNAFFECTED
2875 5 MIN. UNAFFECTED
2875 5 MIN. UNAFFECTED
3025 7 MIN. UNAFFECTED
3100 3 MIN. UNAFFECTED
ALL TESTING ACCOMPliSHED IN EXHAUST GASES OF RAMJET TYPE BURNER: SOUND lEVEL AT SPECIMEN ::::
200 db; GAS VELOCITY =: 7500 f.p"s.; AND MASS FLOW/THROAT AREA := 0.7 pps/in.
2

:...t
STONER
D2-6027-2
54
G.H. STONER
D2-6027-2 54
Z O m O Z
-
-
r
-
i
z :
:
:
:
:
3
.
:
_
'
"
z
z :
:
:
3
'
_
l
'
-
-
-
{
,
Z
3
l
,
-
-
,
z D
I
,
.
,
i
,
J
m C
:
3
Z
m
Z
_
_
.
.
_
>
.
-
C
:
3
-
-
r
.
-
Z
z C
_
z
-
-
O
m J
,
,
_
c
z
:
:
:
C
3
L
L
J
,
.
,
,
.
,
_
z
t
-
-
.
.

z O D
t
'
.
-
-
-
F
-
Z
C
:
3
{
.
,
_
O
z {
.
.
3
_
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
5
5
~
I
~
l:...:>
..;J
I
l:...:>
01
01
DYNA SOAR STEP I DEVELOPMENT
INITIAL BAS Ie
1ST GROUND LAUNCH
SUBSYSTEMS CONFIG.
90% DRAW I NG 1ST A I R LAUNCH
SPEes ESTAB. M/U DEI RELEASE 1ST GTV
MONTHS 4
9 12 13 21 24 31 38 41
t
CONF I G URA TI ON
I DETAil

QUALIFICATION &
DEVELOPMENT
I DESIGN
~ VERIFICATION
I
I N ] W d O I ] A ] Q
I
_ I V O S
S I ] H .
. , , _ .
i l _ ' + _ ; + + + + _ + + "
i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , _ v , , _ _ _ _ . , , , ' - - -
i v
2 : ' : : + : i : _ ! _ ; i * _ . . . . . / 1 / _ k
\ i O V I H V ' O 0
! 1 4 i , ! _ _ : . . . .
+ + d A - i L 9 1 J N 0 3 P _
+ + l , : _ o + L + : + : ) l s v , ! _ _ _ , , ,
+ i l l . + + i
1 3 V H I N 0 3 _ i i T + + i g _
_ _ S W l I S A S g i I S
I
L _ .
Q
I

I N J W d 0 1 J A J G I d J l S H Y O S Y N A G
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I

I
O V 1 H V - 0 9
1
I I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
n s
- - - - - j
I
I
I
I
_ _ _ J
J . N : I W d O I ] A _ I ( ! I d _ l J . S _ l V O S V N A ( i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
o
c . o
I
3 S V 3 U H
9 N I M Y H O
% 0 6


k : : s w m r s a n s
I H Y O S
- - l
I
I

I
I
. _ / ' I
I
/ '
I
\

I b - - - - - - - 1
r p r I
O V 3 H V 0 9
1
I
I n S I
9 I : 1 N O ) I
) I S V 8 - . . . . . . I
I
I
I - - - - - - j
' - ' - - - _ I
, , ' : = : l l l l l l l l l _ I
l D ; ; ; " a m r S l n s _ _ J
Y N A G
' : _ " H 3 N I I V I
H 3 N I 1 V 1
t i
a N I l O I I 9
I N : i W d O l : t A ] ( i I d : l l S H V O S V N , _ ( ]
o c )
|
I
I
0')
o
l\:l

I
l\:l

00

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
SU
I , 'I
-It]
: V
I
I
IGOAHEAD
I

\
I
L--
I
I
I
I
i--
I
I
L __
BASIC
CON FIG
ESTAB
DYNA

OHftS 1
SOAR STEP I
j./cl


90%
DRAWING
RELEASE

'''V' I



rw
V-f.'\i

" \" ,:, '/


-;:HETS -;. 'HETS -;:'HETS
DEVELOPMENT
f
'A' II



1ST GROUND
TEST VEHICLE


-1ST AIR

LAUNCH A"
'0::::>
, I
" j:

I',' , , I
o 0 ,
, I I
c:=======;--"--"
6
g
0
0
i F
"
m Z 0 3
>
0 -
-
4
3
>
_
m
"
-
'
r
'
.
l
c r
-
- l
r
"
-
m
-
-
4
-
.
.
.
[
-
.
4
u r
-
"
0 Z c
0
Z -
<
m
0 -
1
-
"
(
:
:
)
I
Z
c
0 0 Z
|
_
j
0 Z -
-
4
z
~
I
CD
g
~
N
OJ
CC
NATURE OF WORK IN NEXT 912 MONTHS
IMPROVE THE STATE OF THE ART
ANALYSIS
TEST
PROCEED WITH TEST SYSTEM DES IGN
BAS IC SYSTEM
VARIATIONS WITHIN NEW GROUND RULES
IMPLEMENT PROGRAM EFFORT TOWARD FIRST FULL-SCALE TEST ARTICLE
Z Z
..W
l[?
z 0 m E
_
C
_
)
E
_
<
C
r
_
E
l
.

Z 0 m Z
m r
Y
E
_
,
.
<
,
V
_
Z
.
I
-
-
-
m
0
Z
r
Y
r
Y
,
I
L
l
E
_
m 0 :
:
Z
:
:
I
-
-
s q
.
9
Z m r
m
Z m
|
Z m l
-
-
m
E
_
E
_
>
<
0
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
6
0
a
I
~
~
....;j
I
~
~
KEY TECHNICAL AREAS
TEMPERATURE - ACCURATE PREDICTION
STABILITY & CONTROL - TRIM AT HYPERSONIC SPEEDS
COATED MATERIALS - OXIDATION PROTECTION
COMMUNICATIONS - ION SHEATH ATTENUATION
MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT - FACILITIES, PROCESSES, PROPERTIES
NOSE CAP - MATERIALS, FABRICATION, STRUCT. SUPPORT
INSULATED PANELS - HEAT SHORTS. MATERIALS. EXPANS ION
TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
( U D ~ A X PREDICTION - STEP I LANDING SITE CHOICE
|
cb
o
b_
I
c_
DYNA SOAR STEPI DEVELOPMENT
BAS IC CONF IGURATION
ESIABLISHED
SUBSYSTEM
SPECS RELEASED MOCKUP 90% DRAWING
#, DE! RELEASE
4 12 13 2! 24
PLAN
1ST GTV
31
IST GROUND
LAUNCH
IST AiR
LAUNCH
38 41
~ 100
~ 90
0:::
80
DYNA SOAR STEP I DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SUBSYSTEM
BAS IC CONFIGURATION
ESTABLIS HED
SPECS RELEASED MOCKUP 90% DRAWING
(..,).....1 I RELEASE
I DEI
1ST GROUND
LAUNCH
Z 0 m I
-
=
i
-
=
Z _
.
:W
-
l
[
.
_
_
m
m Z z D
-
=
a
m
=
i
_
=
w .
.
J
F
-
-
m Z 0 Z
a
-
I
O
_

e
_
z
_
_
_
_
o

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
6
2
~
I
m
o
r:-"
~
r:-"
m
r:-"
KEY TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS
PRESENTATION TITLE
A. FLIGHT TECHNOLOGY
L AERODYNAMIC STAB ILITY
2. AERODYNAMIC CONTROL EFFECTIVENESS
3. LID PRED ICTION
4. PERFORMANCE PRED (CTION & STEP'
LANDING SITE SELECTION
5. LANDING CAPABILITY
6" AERODYNAMIC HEATING
7 _ FLIGHT CONTROL & ENERGY MANAGEMENT
8. HETS FREE-FLIGHT TESTS
9_ BOOSTER STABILITY & FIN SIZING
10. TITAN STAGING - STEP I
11. TITAN PROPULS ION CHANGES
SPEAKER
A. LEE
A. LEE
J. LES KO
R. SMITH
H, McGRAW
A. NAGEL
L. MASON
F. McRAE
W .. BLISS ELL
W. BLISSELL
R. ORR
I
_
9
g
-
L
g
O
9
-
g
C
I
:
o

-
-
_
5
"
)
Z
r
w
-
i
z
c
_
.
.
<
:
7
0 c
z im a
l
0 Z

e
o
n
_
e
Z o 0
r
r
l
Z 0
Z F
'
-
P
r
l
-
C
,
-
-
4
Z m
Z -
-
4
-
-
4
0 Z
~
I
0)
o
t.:>
-:J
I
t.:>
0)
~
KEY TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS
PRESENTATION TITLE
B. PHYS ICS TECHNOLOGY
1. COMMUN I CA TI ONS
2. GUIDANCE & ENERGY
3. TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT
SPEAKER
D. SCIDMORE
B. MUZZEY
R.SHAHAN
- ------_. __ .- ._--_._.----- - ~ . __ .---------_.- ---_. __ ._----- - -------
z 0 R Z
I
,
,
_
m z
!
f
f
1
1
:
i
.
i
.
i
.
_
.
J
j
-
-
h F
-
-
Z 0 m F
-
-
F
-
-
Z L
_
C
)
C
:
C
_
>
-

D
0
.
,
_
,
J
0
Z -
r
"
!
,
.
-
-
C
_
2
2
)
I
-
-

_
1
:
2
)
C
_
i
-
-
-
L
r
)
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
6
4
~
I
~
o
1:-0
-;J
I
1:-0
~
H:>.
KEY TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS
PRtSENTATION TITLE
C. STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY
.. "" ~
1. HEATING TOLERANCES -EFFECT OF DS
2. DYNA SOAR GLIDER FLIGHT ENVELOPE
3. EM ISS 'V I TY
4. COATED REFRACTORY METALS
5. fNSULATED SKfN PANELS
6. NOSE CAP - HOT GAS TESTING
7. LEAD I NG EDGES
8. GLIDER PRIMARY STRUCTURE-TRUSS TYPE
9. STRUCTURAL COMPONENT CONCEPTS-GLIDER
10. HETS FREE FLI GHT TES TS -S TR UCTURE
11. TITAN STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS
12. BOOSTER REQU' REMENTS AS INFLUENCED
BY DYNAMICS AND LOADS
13. WATER WICK PANEL DEVELOPMENT
SPEAKER
H. KLOPFENS TE IN
E. CZARNECKI
M. BRAUN
M. NELSON
A. HEPLER
E. KAMINSKY
W. STRATION
M. NELSON
A. HEPLER
F. McRAE
B. WIBLE
R. HAYNES
R. CAMPBELL
A.H, LEE
D2-6027-2 65
A.H. LEE
D2-6027-2
.
65
m Z z
O r
w
,
b
-
.
.
Z O _
_
J
m
r
_
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
6
6
J
i

G
I
.
!

R
C
E
P

-
c

.
.
.
.

.
.
.
J

a
l
l
:

0

-
c

0
:
:
:
:

~

Z

.
.
.
.
.

0

u

-
c

o
(
J
J

v

-
~

z

:
c

.
.
.
J

V

a
:
l

.
.
.

;
:
:

~

V
)

>
-

.
.
.
.

=
-
=

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2

6
6

"
1
3
O
0
0
1
-
3
Q
n
l
i
l
l
V
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
6
7

I
8

-'I
I


-'I
300
250
.
t:: 200
o
8
...-4
l 150
LI.J
o
:::>
t-
100

50
FLIGHT REGIME
C
L
MAX \] 0 CL MAX
LIMITED BY LIMITED BY
NEUTRAL WING Lf FT
STAB ILfTY CAPAB JUTY

REQ U I REMENT
.... --
----
/...... I'tI\C \'RtSS\lRt

.... ""
.... ""
, ....
..........
...... V

SOME WI ND-TUNNEL
...... I TEST DATA AVAILABLE
I N THESE AREAS.
o 5 10 15 20 25
RELATIVE VELOC ITY-looO FPS
I
o
!
oo
L,U
g
'_0
Z::E
>-- C._
2o
LONGITUDINALSTABILITY
EXTENDED TIP EXTENSION
RETRACTED TIP EXTENSION _"_
74" _
72 eL
7O 2
68 -- ------ (L/D)MAX. STABLE "4 TOCLMAX
"C L
66 _Z _-
64 ,".......................... CENTEROF ---------. i
62 BEGIN FLARE "---- GRAVITY UNSTABLE
60__ TOUCHDOWN ._-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 _I 20
_CH NUMBER
;;1
<:r.>
00
,
EXTENDED
a:::
I...I.J
.........
Z
I...I.J
U
U
74
72
-"'0
a::: 68
<co
ZI
>- u 66
0 .........
00
a::: 0 64 .

8 62

60
LONGITUDINAL STABILITY
....
TI P EXTENS ION
RETRACTED TIP
... CENTER OF
GRAVITY
UNSTABLE
TOUCHDOWN
MACH NUMBER
20

c
_
o
a
g
N
m m _
a
g

<
_
X
i
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
6
9
~
~
I
<:S)
o
M
....:J
I
M
<:S)
CO
PREDICTED HYPERSONIC STABILITY
INTERMEDIATE LID DYNA SOAR GLIDER
c:::::: 2:J
1.4
C
L
MAX II
-200 -IOu
(LID) MAX l)
em 63 CR
10
oC :: 50
C
40
M=20
.

m I i
Z 0
.
.
.
.
ll'3
ll.
.
.
Z
z
0
i,
I
0
0
I
0
e
i
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
7
0
~
I
0)
o
~
t
~
c1
r-- --- -- - ----------------------- ---------------------- ----- ---
I
I
I
C
N
.01
1.41
~ ~ o
~ o
l . ~ . / ~
1.
1
Lf
,.,
+ +
! fB
11 +
1'l-6 /
, I
\i.4 j
.2
HYPERSONIC STABILITY DATA
M = B.OB
AEDC B-2 TUNNEL
MOD. PHAS E I MODEL
~ ~
C J1
+ APRIL 59 TEST PERIOD
JULY 59 TEST PERIOD }6
e
= 0
c FEB 60 PHASE a PERIOD
- .03 -. 04 - . 05 - . 06
C
m
.63 CR
o
1
"
Q
:
g
"
'
u
_
_
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
_
o
_
.

-
y
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
7
1
~
I
~
tIO
~
r:-"
~
t-.l
PREDICTED
TYPICAL EARLY HOTSHOT I AND II
STABILITY DATA, M ~ 20
1 112% C R S TA B III TV
, S MORE STABLE /1
STABLE ./ 5{)ooC.
c'
N
\
\
\ - .sll /
.6
1
__ 10
t
~ 15
.2 \.... 100
5
HOT SHOT I SEPT. 58
A HOT SHOT II MAR. 59
0 -.02 - .03
C
m
.681C
R
.02 .01
-.2
g
A
g
-
L
g
0
9
-
g
(
:
I
o
3
C
'
,
|
i
l
l
I
1
I
I
P
_
!
m C
'
)
o
_
0
@
-
N
'
T
"
O
0
-
_
-
-
_
O
0
m -
N
_
_
,
k
X
1
k
_
1
O
0
I
k
J
1
|
k
J
1
"
,
4
-

m -

z
0
I
I
I
Z 0 llllm
I
W
m m -
-
4
,
-
-
I
I
8
I
0'>
<0
'-"
"'I
I
'-"

TYPICAL EARLY HOT SHOT STABILITY DATA
M=20
1. 4 - - _.- - -
\ 1.2
\
\
\ 1.0
\
\
eN \ 8
\ .
. 6
.4
.2
o
.......... ", ................... ,,'
.);;JW';;)};;)
I
I
40
I
I PREDICTED

HOT S HOT I SEPT. 1958
o HOT S HOT II MARCH 1959
-.0 1 -.0 2 -.0 3 -.0 4 -.0 5 -.0 6
Cm.
667
C
R
1:::;I
!
o
I
,,-.,1
CN
HYPERSONICSTABILITY DATA M= 20
0
-.01-.02-.03-.04-.05-.06
C
m
.63CR
6e =
_e =
0e =
20
-10
-20
_40o
....................... PREDICTED
B.A.C. PHASEI CONFIG.
S
e
S
: 9.5_
HYPERSONIC STABILITY DATA M = 20
o
~
I
~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
. 01 KJ -.01 -.02 -.03 -.04 -.05 -.06
em
.63C
R
rn
EE
... ~ ... . .....
EkE3
1
t J
m
6 e ==
6 e ==
6 e ::::
6 e --
6 e :=
PRED ICTED
B.A.C. PHASE f CONFIG .
Se
= 9.5%
S
!
c_
o
I
b_
LOWER SURFACEPRESSUREDATA HOT SHOT II
PRESSURE RATIO
P/PREF
olO
o 0
o o MODIFIED VISCOUS INTERACTION THEORY
o
----- PHASE I BAC PRESSURE ESTIMATING BASIS;
m_--
__'1-- o X' = 30 e
/
o
, t
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PERCENT ROOT CHORD
0 lO
LOWER SURFACE PRESSURE DATA HOT SHOT II
.70
. 60
.50
PRESSURE RATIO
P/P
REF
.40
30
.20
.10
0-- -0 .... -0- -- ---:0- ..... ---0 ......... ----0---
()
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>

NOSE TILT LINE




-.0 .
---------1: 0(=45
0
<> .. ..
<> <>
()
<>
\. (/) : <> MODIFIED VISCOUS INTERACTION THEORY

(/) - - - - PHASE I BAC PRESSURE ESTIMATING BASIS;

--------=1: 0(=300 (/) .
1----
I
P REF = TOTAL PRESSURE
BEHIND NORMAL SHOCK
()(=lS
o
'- .. ___ = __ L ... ___ I t-
o 8 0( - 0 0

o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PERCENT ROOT CHORD
lz;I
i
o
bo
--..7
I
ba
-...1
o-I
A
i.,IJ
m
r,r'
Z
::3
o
o

:E
Z
O
.50
z
40
Z
>-.
O
c_
HELIUM-AIR STABILITY DATA
B.A.C. DEI (1047) _ _ 0o
MODEL AND DATA c,< 10 _r e
73
HELIUM DATA FROM
tic I _ L.R.C. 11-1NC H TUNNEL
il
N.A.S.A. (L
RESEARCH MODEL 1._!
AND DATA r'-74.25
0 2 4 (5 8 10 12 14 16 18
MACH NUMBER
t:l
~
I
~
0
~
""
c
HELIUM-AIR STABILITY DATA
I
UJ
~
:E
~
IY
I--
Z
::::>
.
u
B.A.C. DEI (1047)
0
cx:=10 S e =0

70 MODEL AND DATA
.
~
~
z
60 0
I--

HELIUM DATA FROM
~
L.R.C. II-INCH TUNNEL .....J
50
IY
UJ
----
.-/"--
-----
I--
Z
~
UJ
U
u 40
N .A . S .A. (L. R . C J
~
RESEARCH MODEL

AND DATA
z
>-
0
30
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
18
IY
UJ
MACH NUMBER
""
01
I
,
,
=
,
m
"
=
=
-
'-
=
E
C
_
x
o
C
:
)
o
o
o
o
r
y
"
"
r
-
<
C
_
c
_
o
o
m
-
.,,=
l
r
-
"
_
m
,'-
N
0
_
_
x
m
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
7
6

I
Cj)
o
I:\:)
-:J
I
I:\:)
-:J
Cj)
.35
.30
.25
CL
.20
15
.10
.05
I
N.A.S.A. HELIUM .. AIR STABILITY DATA
HYPERSONIC, M == 9.6 TO 18.4
o
I
cf- =2301
I
ESTIMATED I
/0 ----M=IO.
,-- -1.25
6 C
N
I
I
I O{M..I
AI AI
a20
. 15
d rJ:=15
:P REF. CR -I
/' J. c::::_ IJ .i=9
0
\<Il'L.05
;e k c =30\
a
C

/'rA
SYM MACH
0 9.6
A 10.6

17.0
x 17.8
c 18.4
'----

0.6
2.0
1.8
2.8
4.2
10 20 30 .02 o - 01 -,02
.
ANGLE OF ATTACK
-- DEG.

01 C
m
.624 CR

TESTI NG.
MEDIUM
AIR
He
He
He
He
............
5
2
,
g
-
L
g
O
9
-
g
C
I
0
0 m t
f
_
.
-
-
!
C
_
q -
.
<
0
-
r
-
m
i
f
-
,
0 0
z
0
m
-
.
<
Z 0 r
"
Z c m
r
-
-
C
'
)
c
-
-
C
_

f
j
C
Z r
-
-
i
(
z
:
:
.
.
_
m
Z
:
_
z
m
_
:
y
-
n
(
'
_
0 0
0
r
-
-
"
1
"
1
o
e
3
m
.
0
C m
~
I
~
~
-;J
I
~
-;J
-;J
DATA REQUIRED
ACCURATE STAB IltTY AND CONTROL DATA AT
All SPEEDS 1 I NClUD I NG EFFECTS OF:
REYNOLDS NUMBER
THERMAL DISTORTION
AEROELASTrCITY
t,o
|
c:b
o
|
.,,i
(30
HYPERSONICGROUND FACILITY CAPABILITY
25
CL MAX
LIDMAX
(3C:
:E
:D
Z
3:
C3
20
15
I0
5
AEDC B
GE 24"
104 105 ' 106 107
REYNOLDS NUMBER BASED ON MODEL LENGTH
HYPERSONIC GROUND FACILITY CAPABILITY
30------
25
20
~ A . ~ . ? ~ ~ . _ .
n:::
I
UJ .
co
~
::J
15
z
:c
u
~
10
GE
2411
5 ........ _--
J Pl21"
NOL #8
o
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
7
REYNOLDS NUMBER BAS ED ON MODEL LENGTH
u
bO
B
O
,,..q
|
b,0
.O
TESTSAPPLICABLE TO
WIND TUNNEL
TECHNICAL AREA
HYPERSONIC
M NTHS ROMGOAHEAI)
WIND TUNNELEVALUATION
PARAMETRIC
STUDIES
LOW SPEED
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
LOW HYPERSONIC
HIGH HYPERSONIC
CONFIGURATION DEVELOPMENTTESTS
1. STABILITY & CONTROLTESTS
LOW SPEED
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
LOW HYPERSON IC
HIGH HYPERSONIC
HINGE MOMENT TESTS
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
AEROELASTIC TESTS FOR
STABILITY & CONTROLDATA
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
TEST PLAN
|
90% DWG RELEASE
MODE L TESTS
OF IMPROVED
CONFIGURATION
I I
|
II
TEST EFFECT
OF MINOR
CHANGES
I
|
I
| III
m |
|
|
|
CONFIGURATION
REFINEMENT
I II
I l
I li
Ill
|
i
WIND TUNNEL TEST PLAN
TESTS APPLICABLE TO TECHNICAL AREA
90% DWG RELEASE
Q
MONTHS FROM GO AHEAD
HYPERSONIC WIND TUNNEL EVALUATION
PARAMETRIC
STUD I ES
LOW SPEED
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
LOW HYPERSONIC
HIGH HYPERSONIC
CONFIGURATION DEVELOPMENT TESTS
1. STAB rLirv & CONTROL TESTS
LOW SPEED
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
LOW HYPERSONIC
HIGH HYPERSONIC
2. HINGE MOMENT TESTS
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
3. AEROELASTIC TESTS FOR
STAB ILiTY & CONTROL DATA
TRANSONIC
SUPERSONIC
31 61 9 12 151 181 211 24
-

I
I



..

MODEL TESTS TEST EFFECT CONFIGURATION
OF IMPROVED OF MINOR REFINEMENT
CONFIGURATION CHANGES


I I
I I I
I
I III I

I




S d V 3 : l A ( I O @ o
O N i _ I V : : t ] ] S O N
3 O N 3 ( I I O N I 3 S O N o
V 3 _ I V N O A 3 1 3 @ O N I M _ V I S
@
s 3 a f l i v 3 3 1 3 G O W
. . . . . . . . . . . . ! : ! : ' , ! : . . . . . . . . .
S _
_ - _ . _ _ _ _
$ 1 ] ( I O I M I S ] 1 1 ] f i N n 1 ( I N I M
0
o o
|
C q
C )
!
A
S d V l : i A G O S 3 : J N 3 G I : J N I 3 S 0 N
~ N I H I \ f : i 3 S 0 N V 3 ~ V N O l \ 3 1 3 ~ N I M 8 V l S
S 3 ~ n l V 3 : i 1 3 0 0 W
S l J G O W l S J l l J N N n l G N I M
o
0 0
|
c_
I
FREE FLIGHT MODEL TESTS
HYPERSONICENVIRONMENTALTESTVEHICLE
PROGRAM NII LESTONES
_.._._
FULL SCALENOSE&
FOREBODYMODEL
GLIDERCONFIGURATION
MONTHSFROMGOAHEAD
0 12 24
l_ ........... I.......... I........... _I ........... I...... _...I .......... I........... I........... i................... L_
"-I ..... ........... _......... _iq:I--F-K-VF-_[_ i : i ....
90% DWG.
13
RELEASE
A
_r
&,,e
19
00
....
FREE FLIGHT MODEL TESTS
HYPERSONIC ENVIRONMENTAL TEST VEHICLE
PROGRAM MILESTONES
FULL SCALE NOSE &
FOREBODY MODEL
GLIDER CONFIGURATION
o
MONTHS FROM GO AHEAD
12
fr
13
24
90% DWG.
RELEASE
A
I.
, .
t/A
, .
. .
, ..
19
(I)
!
c;,
_o
|
_o
GO
bo
AERODYNAMIC TESI' VEHICLE
1

RECOVERY PACKAGE
1/5 SCALE MODEL . _ _._
GUIDANCE PACKAGE
ANTARES 3RD STAGE ENGINE
j_
GRAPHITE
BERYLIUM L.E&LOWERSURFACE
Lj _._ ....
_ AERODYNAMIC MODEL /NTARES MOTOR
3 STAGE HETS CONFIGURATION
BURNOUT WEIGHT 1089LBS.
ALGOL MOTOR
WE'GHT BREAKDOWN _ _ I
AERO MODEL
3RD STAGE (B.O.)
3RD STAGE (START)
2ND STAGE (B.O.)
2ND STAGE (START)
1ST STAGE (B.O.)
1ST STAGE (START)
1089 LBS.
3164 LBS.
5220 LBS.
1252OLBS.
17439 LBS.
_)4_ LBS
AERODYNAMIC TEST
GRAPHITE
3 STAGE HErS CONFIGURATION
VEHICLE
ANTARES 3RD STAGE ENG I NE
BURNOUT WEIGHT 1089 lBS.
AERO MODEL
3RD STAGE (B.O.l
3RD STAGE (START)
2ND STAGE (6.0.1
2ND STAGE (START)
1ST STAGE (B.O.l
1ST STAGE (START)
195 lBS
1089 lBS.
3164 lBS .
5220 lBS.
12520 lBS.
11439 lBS.
36436 lBS
J. L. POWELL- MARTINCO.
D2-6027-2
83
J. L. POWELL MARTIN CO.
D2-6027-2
83
_
8
g
-
L
g
O
9
-
g
(
I
Z
Z
_
_
_
Z
-
<
Z
Z
,
,
-
-
C
Z
r
-
"
-
-
-
I
0 I
'
-
"
r
-
-
r
'
r
'
l
"
8
g
r
'
-
"
.
_
"

o
o
.
'
I
O
o
0 0
C
D
0 0
<
0
C
D
_
l
X
O
C
_
O
0
O
o
N
_
'
_
-
_
z

-
_
'
_
-
'
_
"
r
.
_
_
_
C
D
_
,
o
"
0
r
-
-
-
_
O
_
o 0
-
-
t
-
-
-
t
I -
-
!
z i
_
u
-
-
t
0 I i m
-
<
Z
-
-
|
0
-
-
t
i i
~
I
m
o
t-.:l
-.J
I
t-.:l
00
~
Wp USABLE
Wp TOTAL
GW
L
WE
A
FN
WDRY
ISp
.
Wp
off
tB
FNfW INITIAL
FNfW BURNOUT
STAGE I
267,159
270,609
279,690
9,063
0.955
430,000 SL
9,063
256 SL
1,6BO
1. 93
158.4
1.2
5.7
TITAN II
STAGE II
62,664
63,468
76, 633 (BOOo)
131561NCLUDING
, PAYLOAD
0.914 WOfPL
0.818 WfPL
100,000 VAC
13, 156 (8000)
312 VAC
321
LBO
194.5
1.3
7.1
DYNA-SOAR
STAGE I STAGE II
267,993 34,143
270,912 35,000
285,388 52,418 (12,000)
13,153
174181NCLUDING
' PAYLOAD
0.943
0.845 WOfPL
0.652 WfPL
430,000 SL BO,OOO VAC
13,153 17,418 (12,000)
256 SL 420 VAC
1,6BO
190
1. 93
5.0
158.4 180.0
1.28 1.52
6.9 4.2
H. W. KLOPFENSTEIN
D2-6027-2 85
-- !5E--PfI
H. W. KLOPFENSTEIN
D2-6027-2
85
Z
m
Z
t
,
-
i
u
.
m
L
,
_
.
.
.

v

Z

Z

C
o
:
)

e

-
a
&
:

V
'
t

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.
.

Q

0

I
-
Z

0

C
o
:
)

Z

I
-
-
V

l
-
e

.
.
.

.
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

:
c

.
.
.

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2

9
E
G
I
N
l
l
i
r

8
6

d o - , - . " d W 3 1 " i l N b 3 1 N I O d N O I I V N O V I S
0 0 _ 1 7 O O O 1 7 0 0 _
] I I I I . I . V I I ] d W ] , I . d V ) ] $ O N
N O I . I . V i I t V A I I ] : I S N V t I . I . . I . V I H t 0 l ) ] J J ]
0 0 0
O _ I
0 6 1
r _
0
0
0
0 , 1
I
o
_ D
!
,
~
I
~
t>.:I
--1
I
t.:>
00
--1
I-
u....
250
240
8 230
o
.......
~ 220
Q
l-
I- 210
.....J

200
190
EFFECT OF HEAT TRANSFER VARIATION
ON NOSECAP TEMPERATURE
'" ""'" h ( TAW - TW ) ".C(j r4w
,
,
,
,
REL. VEL.=: 20,7000 FPS
"
""
EFFECT OF 25% INCREASE/>,
NOSE DIA IS" E. =.6
" "
,
,
,
TEMP PREDICTED-' I ~ F : ' : ' , !
C
l
AT LlDMAX.
rp:; 45
, I
.......
"i,
. ,
I ......
~ T= i
- ....... : ....... -
220 !
I
.
I
180 I
3000 3500 4000
STAGNATION POINT EQUIL. TEMP ,,,,,,,oF
---_._--_ ..
4500
-----1
I
,: :iI
I
o
I
b_
oo
oo
EFFECT
2500
2000
LATERAL
1500
RANGE
I000
5OO
OF INCREASEDc_ ON LATERALMANEUVER
BANK ANGLE_____
COMPENSATION
CAPABILITY
0 I0 20
% INCREASE
ANGLEOF ATTACK
COMPENSATION
30 4O .:0
OVER PREDICTED HEATING RATE
.................................................... _ __ ....... _._... __
00
00
EFFECT OF INCREASED ci ON LATERAL MANEUVER CAPABILITY
2500
2000
LATERAL
1500
RANGE
1000
500
o
- - - ~ - -
--
-_.
f----
o
._._-------_._------ _._--- ._----- ----- '.
1
INITIAL VELOCITY = 23,000 FPS, fJ =5
I
I
\
----
I
" ..
~ ~ .......
'"
. .\ .... ..1.
JANK ANGLE \
~ - ~
COMPENSAT I ON --".--------
\
COMB INED
r
BANK ANGLE AND
."
-
ANGLE OF ATTACK
COMPENSA nON
,,- - - - - ~ ~ , , . ,
10 20 30 50
70 INCREASE OVER PREDICTED HEATING RATE
I
b_
I
b_
OO
EFFECT OF EMISSIVITY ON
TEMPERATURE
l LOWERSURFACE- NOSESKIRT
7OOO _- 0
l/ CL MAX GLIDE,
6000I_ VR: 18700FPS
__m T: 232,0oo FT. o
_ooI _ I_---- DEstoN _:.9
| _ RANGEOF
1000_ APPLICABLE
O0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 i.0
1000
6000
LL"
0
1
5000
UJ
a:::
;:::)
4000
:E
3000
UJ
J-.
2000
1000
00
EFFECT OF EMISSIVITY ON TEMPERATURE
LOWER SURFACE - NOSE SKIRT
CL MAX Gli DE I :: 0
VR :: 18100 FPS
A L T , :: 232,000 FT .
3000F IGN TEMP. 2700F
I DESIGNf::,9
I RANGE OF
APPLICABLE
DATA
Wi
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
I
o_
O
,<I
I
25O
2OO
(_- BTU/FT2
SEC
150
100
5O
30OO
NOSECAP
TEMPERATURE
DI STANCEFROMCATHODE
-c=.9 -c=o
CML
GLIDE
RE_ENTRY
3500 4000 4500
SURFACETEMPERATUREo OF
5000
CAPABILITY
FQ STING
i
. .....
l MODELNOSE
CAP
ARC UNIT
250
200
~ - BTU/FT
2
SEC
150
100
NOSECAP TEMPERATURE CAPABILITY
DISTANCE FROM CATHODE 7.51N
/
5 0 ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~
3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
SURFACE TEMPERATURE - of
STING
Z 0 a
.
.
Z
_
J
'
n
-
,
m
<
o
r
'
)
I
-
-
.
<
Z
>
0
r
Y
0
1
-
-
o
o
Z
_
_
e

Z
% Z m m Z m
Z Z 0 e
_
0 >
-
-
.
J
r
_
Z
_
Z
:
3
_
I
,
-
-
t
Z
Z
)
I
-
-
,
-
I
-
-
-
L
I
.
,
I
Z
u
0 "
-
Z
Z
c
_
O
_
-
-
-
(
,
,
b
_
i
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
~
I
~
tI:'I
~
Nl
(0
1-1.
DESIGN APPROACH
USE BEST THEORETICAL VALUES FOR HEAT
TRANSFER RATE BASED ON DATA AVAILABLE
OBTAIN COMPLETE HEAT TRANSFER DATA
COVERAGE THROUGH GROUND TEST I FREE
FLIGHT MODEL TESTS & D.S FLIGHT TESTS
ESTABLIS H EMISS IVITY ON SPEC IMENS
US I NG BEST TECHN IQUES
VERIFY COMPONENT INTEGRITY IN PLASMA
TUNNEL
MUST CONS IDER COMB INED TEMPERATURE-
LOAD-S TRENGTH
m Z Z _
_
J
I m
_
_
J
p
-
-
>
-
r
_
O r
_
D
-
-
O

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
9
2
.
K
O
i
t
l
1

c

.
.
.

V
l

a
.
=

.
.
.
.
I

C

~

a
.
J

~

.

.
.
.
.

>
-
C

~

v

0

-
I
-
z
:

U

:
:
c

~

v

L
L
.

a
.
J

.
.
.

0
:
:

~

0

a
.
J

.
.
.
.

l
-
e
:
(

C

0

v

u

- ~

- a
.
=

v

D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2

9
2

Z L
_
I
m 0
Z 0
Z
w
L
_
C
k
.
Z
m w
O
Z 0 m L
_
L
_
Z
L
_
L
_
Z 0 Z
L
_
0
Z 0
L
_
0
q
_
_
0
_

0
-
0 q
_
0

o
_

k
-
-
0
k
-
-
_
q
Z 0 k
-
-
Z
@
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
9
3
;
I
g
IS)
7'
IS)
~
(0
00
COATING REQUIREMENTS
ox IDA TI ON PROTECn ON
PERMITS NON-DESTRUCTIVE INS PECTION
ADHERENCE TO BASE METAL
ORB IT: NEAR VACUUM AT 50F
RE ... ENTRY: HIGH TEMPERATURE
SOAK, GASEOUS EROS tON
ADAPTABLE TO COMPLEX PARTS
RETENTION OF BASE METAL PROPERTIES
- - - ~ l
(
.
9
Z
I
-
-
,
,
,
e
l
0 1
,
,
,
@
z

_
>
-
_
E
t
,
l
,
.
,
-
-
-
-
Z 0
I I
.
m
.
I
l
,
#
'
t
,
!
r
.
_
)
!
Z
r
,
D
Z
1
-
-
-
,
,
_
0 r
,
D
i
C
L
.
Z
8
E
L
L
I
(
.
_
c
z
:
:
>
-
Q
D
Z k C
L
m
|
C
D
1
7
1
r
.
.
D
U

1
.
_

C
:
_
0
C
_
m
_
_
_
m
Z
L
_
C
L
_
i
z
r
,
D
:
:
:
:
:
)
C
:
_
C
:
)
C
L
.
l
-
.
-
Z
_
L
L
_
z
0 0 r
,
D
|
z
z
I
-
-
:
D
c
:
l
c
(
D
m m
(
D
0
(
D
m ,
.
.
.
1
n (
,
/
'
}
I
.
.
-
-
.
.
.
.
1
1
-
.
-
I
-
-
-
(
D
Z
m
0
Z
Z
}
Z
Z
_
.
-
-
-
_
.
.
.
,
i
z
I
,
-
-
-
-
B m
I
-
-
-
-
D .
.
.
.
.
I
0 0 m m
i
-
-
.
-
m m i
,
-
-
-
-
|
0
_
.
_
0 C
x
.
.
:
Z
C
_
b
I
:
)
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
9
4
~
I
0)
o
~
-."J
I
~
co
If:..
r-- ....
SELECTION OF BASE METAL & COATING
I
I
PRIMARY CONTENDERS
I
I
S UPPLI ER FABRICATOR ENGR. COATING EXPERIENCE
DATA
VAPOR
EXPER- PRODUC EXPER- FABRfC- DIPPING PLASMA
!ENCE TrON !ENCE AB! LlTY
AVAIL-
SPRAY DECOMP-
I
ABLE
OS ITiON
MOLYB-
CONS I D-
CONS I D CONS I D-
. DENUM LIMITED POOR GOOD LIMITED LIMITED
iBASE
ERABLE ERABLE ERABLE
i
COLUM-
BlUM' LIMITED LIMITED LIMITED GOOD LIMITED LI M ITED LIM ITED LIMITED
i
BASE
leoATlNG
ALUM- CERAMIC
INUM OXIDES
I MATER- NO PF OBLEM LIM ITED
SILICON MANY
SILICON
\ IAL
METALS
I
I
_.1--_
.. --_.- -_ ... _-_.- - ------------- - - ._----
_._ .
QuALITY
AFTER
COATING
FA IR
UN-
CERTAIN
I
!
o
|
f)
rl
,)
D
rl
e.o
o-i
ELONGATIONOF
MOLYBDENUM- 0.5% Ti
z
0
h
z
_o
20
/
...... LONGITUDINAL
TRANSVERSE
/
/
/
/
s\
\
\
\
\
\
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
\ I
I
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ \
/ \
/ \
MATERIAL: AS RECEIVED
UNCOATEDSHEET0.03" TO0.04"
ROOMTEMPERATUREDATA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
HEATNO.
20
10
ELONGATION OF MOL YBDENUM .. 0.5% Ti
~ - - - - - LONGITUDINAL
---- TRANSVERSE
1\
I \
II \
I \
I \
I \
\
\
\
\
----I
I
/
/
....
/'
/ "
/ "
/ "
/ '
. ,
MATERIAL: AS RECEIVED
UNCOATED SHEET 0.03
11
TO 0.04
11
ROOM TEMPERATURE DATA
I
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 2 3 4 5 6 1
HEAT NO.
Z
I
l
t
,
l
,
,
I
_
-
C
.
D
O
_
.
Z
0
_
-
F
_
.
.
C
.
,
_
F
-
-
u
L
.
.
L
.
A
a
_
_
N
a
_
=
7
_
0
0
t
:
_
-
.
0
5
-
r
,
-
,
c
_
:
o
o
>
-
o
_
_
_
o
_
_
_
,
0
Z
@
|
Z
I
Z
I
-
-
-
-z
_
0
0
_
_
M
0
Q
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
~
I
0')
o
t>:l
-..1
I
t>:l
co
0')


TEST EXPERIENCE
BOEING HAS CONDUCTED A
GROUND TEST PROGRAM ON
FUll-SCALE, COATED, REFRACTORY
METAL COMPONENTS UNDER TEST
CONDITIONS CLOSELY S'MULATING
RE-ENTRY COND ITiONS
TESTfNG INCLUDED:
1. PLASMA JET TESTS
- CHICAGO MIDWAY
LA BORA TOR I ES
2. COMBrNED HEAT-STRESS-
VIBRATION TESTS
- BOErNG
k _
S 3 1 1 " I N I W - 3 W 1 1
O L 0 9 O _ _ C _ O g O [ 0
V / V ( ] l $ ] l 1 V 3 1 d A /
0 0 0 [
O 0 0 g
0 0 0 _
r , o
c o
, , o
|
b o
o
c
!
e q l
c )
I

I

t-:>
"'" I
t-:>
CJ)
""
o
N
6-
.-
C"')
"'t
co
IN
l
w...
,)
I
0-
:E
LLJ
.....
TYPICAL TEST DATA
FULL SCALE MOLY + 0.5 Ti COMPONENTS
3000
I
LEA 0 I NG EDGE -== .............. ::..
SA TI S FACTORY
2000
1000
.
.
: 22Q(tF
r IM!&II -. - - - ... __ 1- _
STiFFENEDIS Kr N
PANEL
LEA DING EDGE
RE -ENTRY TEM P
I
: : \
. .
. . \
,: .
,: \

SUR ACES
PROFrLE : .'
I: :,
OX I IZED
I:
. .
I: '.,
.J.
. ..
. .
/:' '.,
/: ".'
".'
... .. "-
.. ' ",
.

.
.. " ". ,
, .. .. .
; . .... . ....
J# .-
, ". .
" .- -.
O
I ,. .... '"
t' "
o 10 20 30 40
50 60 70
TIME - MINUTES
'-
Z a
,
,
.
0
Z
D
.
.
.
z
Z
_
}
.
.
-
Z D Z
D
2
-
6
0
2
7
-
2
9
8
~
I
O':l
o
I:\:)
..;:J
I
I:\:)
ro
00

DEVELOPMENT APPROACH
REFINE VAPOR DECOMPOSfTlON COATING FOR MOLY ... 0.5% TI
MONITOR COATING DEVELOPMENT FOR COLUMB I UM
INVESTIGATE NON'-REFRACTORY METAL CONCEPTS FOR LEADING EDGE
AND INSULATED PANELS
|
I
t_
COATING DEVELOPMENTPROGRAM
PROCESS PRELIM. FINAL
OPTIM. PROC. INSPECT.
STUDI ES SPEC. TECH.
612z12812913o13_
FULL DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION
SCALE OF PRODUCTION PROCESS
COMP. & MANUFACTURE
SPECIFICATION
EVAL. METHODS
PROCESS
OPTIM.
STUD IES
(OATING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FULL
SCALE
COMPo
EVAL.
PRELIM.
PROC.
SPEC.
DEVELOPMENT
OF PRODUCTION
& MANUFACTURE
METHODS
FINAL
r NS PECT.
TECH.
PRODUCTION
PROCESS
SPECIFICATION
O
0
1
g
-
L
g
O
9
-
g
(
l
n 0
Z >
0 Z
C
O
0
0
2
1
2
> Z
m
r
-
-
"
"
'
l
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
!
S
!
!
!
!
is
!
;
i!
_
!
ii@
+
i!
ili
i
:
:
:
:
_
_
.

I

t-:)
t
t-:)
I-'
Q
Q
"
REFRACTORY METAL DEVELOPMENT
PHASE I - IN STOCK MATERIAL
GO TIME MONTHS
AHEAD 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 21
BASE METAL
EVALUAl'0N COMPolELIMINARY DESIGN DAr
[rEST AND EVAL.
COMPONENTS & SPECIMENS
PHASE II - CONTROLLED PROCESS MATERIAL
.
ALL MAT'L
INITIAL QUANTITIES FOR EVAl. PRELIMINARY FABRICATION AND
OF MATERIAL REC. RECEIVED r MATl. SPECS RELEASED
.. ..,
1:.
..
WORK WITH BASE
MET AL PRODUCERS
TO IMPROVE
QUALITY
.. GROUND'EVAL. OF RE-ENTRY
TEST AND EVAL.
OF COATED COMPONENTS
BEGIN
1 METAL EVAL.
2 COATING EVAL.
3 PARD & HETS
FABRICATION
PHAS E III - REF J NED PROCES S MATER IAL
PRODUCERS MATL FAB.
REFINE SPECS SPECS.
PROCESSING METAL RECEIVED RELEASED RELEASED
t t t t !
1 METAL EVALUATION..! t COATED COMPONENT
2 HETS FABRICATION TEST AND EVAl
PAYLOAD
Old Definition
New Definition
All instrumentation, test equipment and
telemetry equipment including support
structure, conditioning equipment, lower
surface heat blockage structure, and
expendables
Military test equipment and scientific
instrumentation necessary to provide
in-flight system performance and
scientific data including only secondary
equipment and structure peculiar to the
payload.
D2-6027-2
I01
PAYLOAD
Old Definition
All instrumentation, test equipment and
telemetry equipment including support
structure, conditioning equipment, lower
surface heat blockage structure, and
expendables 0
New Definition
Military test equipment and scientific
instrumentation necessary to provide
in-flight system performance and
scientific data including only secondary
equipment and structure peculiar to the
payload.
D2-6027-2
'i'iGRKli 101
STEP I
4 321 lbs Ai rfr ame
2 70 Landing Gear
230 Propulsion
Se condary Power
293 Flight Control
786 E lectronics
966 Environmental Control
53O Crew Operations
1000 P aylo ad
92 83 lbs Launch
D2-6027-2
102
STEP I
43211bs Airframe
270 Landing Gear
230 Propulsion
887 Secondary Power
293 Flight Control
786 Electronics
966 Environmental Control
530 Crew Operations
1000 Payload
92831bs Launch
D2-6027-2 a ii.ulM.T 102
?
(
WEIGHTS
Step I * Step IIA Step ILA *
(Once Around) (Twice Around}
Launch Glider Wt. 9,283 9,719 10,008
Re-entry 9,193 9,455 9,590
Landing 8,892 9,063 9_ 168
*Weight Differences between Step I and Step IIA are:
Delta Weight Secondary Power 350 lbs
Environmental Control 3 75 lbs
D2-602 7-2 103
WEIGHTS
Step I * Step lIA
(Once Around)
Launch Glider Wt. 9,283 9,719
Re-entry 9,193 9,455
Landing 8,892 9,063
*Weight Differences between Step I and Step UA are:
Delta Weight Secondary Power 350lbs
Environmental Control 375lbs
D2-6027-2
Step lIA *
(Twice Around)
10,008
9,590
9,168
103
i!/i/_
J.F MILTON
D2-6027-2
104
J.F. MILTON
D2-6027-2
104
'bO
I
O_
O
,,,q
!
LAT. MAN. & ORBIT CHANGE
TOTAL PAYLOAD USED FOR MANEUVER ROCKET
Grl
DR BRAKE
MERe
M-I 1.5LID
FOLD
INFL.
M2B
2.2L/D
1000 2OOO 3OOO
AR LAT (AERO)N.MIo
50(X)

-
:e

z
-
CD
ex
.0
-
I- 1000 ~
:s
ex ~ D R BRAKE
~ -MERe
500 - M-l
LAT. MAN. & ORBIT CHANGE
TOTAL PAYlOAD USED FOR MANEUVER ROCKET

1.5 LID

M2B,
1000
FOLD
INFL. 2.2 LID

I
2000
.A ~ LAT (AERO) N.ML
I
3000
3.0 LID
VI
~
- 10,000 LA.
- 5000
>
~
i _ i :
' i
" I W " N - 3 O N V _ I " . I . V 3
O 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 _ O 0 0 I
_ . . i . . i _ _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O N I M G ' l O . - {
3 1 V " I : i N i
3 _ 1 3 W
3 ) I V _ J 8 0 W J G
3 3 1 A 3 ( I
1 _ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f l V O 1 1 V d
X V W 0 / 3 I V 3 _ 1 1 1 N 3 9 N I 5 n
U _ . , , . . . . . . . . . I
_ I 3 A n 3 N V W O _ J 3 V - " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ : : : : : : : : : : . . . . _ I 3 A F I 3 N V W 1 1 8 1 9 0
' - - I - " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I I I A f i : I N V W l V l I I L V 1 1 V J , O J .
, , , 0 _
!
0
I
!
t3
I:-'
TOTAL LATERAL MANEUVER
I
0')
0
I:-'
..;J
I
I:-'
ORBIT MANEUVERl--i
I III
~ f AERO MANEUVER
US ING ENTIRE
~ I
AT UD MAX
PAYLOAD III
DEVICE
DRAG BRAKE
MERC
M-I
M-2b
1.5 UD
2.2 LID
3.0 LID
INFLATE
FOLD WING
~ 1000
N
2000 3000 4000
I
0-
LAT. RANGE - N.MI.
.....
~
iCQ
N
......
I-'
<.:>
0)
'_II_ _'iii
|
o
I
o
MANEUVEREFFECTSRETURN INTERVAL- EDWARDS
20
15
MAXIMUM RETURN
INTERVAL- HOURS
0 N. MI.
1000N. MI.
2000 N. MI.
',O
|
O_
c'N
0
0 15 30 45 60 75 90
ORBIT INCLINATION DEGREES
3000 N. MI.
4000 N. MI.
LAT. MANEUVER EFFECTS RETURN INTERVAL EDWARDS
25
20
15
MAXrMUM RETURN
INTERVAL - HOURS
10
5
ON. Mf.
..___-1000 N. M I.
-2000 N. MI.
~ ___ 3000 N. M I.
""-- 4000 N. M r.
O ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - -
o 15 30 45 60 75 90
ORBIT INCLINATION DEGREES
1 3 _ 3 3 S
5 3 3 _ ] 9 3 ( 1 - N O l l V N l l 3 N I 1 1 a O
0 6 _ Z 0 9 _ # 0 _ I 0
t W " N O O d _ ( ] / l _ ' I -
. . . . ( I l l Z ' Z 9 -
o I W " N O 0 0 g I
i
" l W N 0 0 0 _ I
I
" i W " N 0 0 0 1 7
S ( I _ I V M ( I ] " A J . i l l S V d V ) N _ l 1 1 1 : l _ ! $ i ) 1 : 1 : i ] _ I ] A f i ] N V W
1 9 _ 1 3 3 5
b O
!
0 ' ,
O g
0 1 7
O 9
0
O 0 I
m r r l
- - t ; ; D
c C )
; P U r _
Z Z
0
Z . , , _
_ : _ C )
O - n
3 : : : : 1 : :
m
o o
I
L _
|
~
l).:)
SECRET
I
(j)
0
l).:)
...;J
I
LATe MANEUVER EFFECTS RETURN CAPABILITY .. EDWARDS
l).:)
II
.'
100
:c
U
o
-I...I.J
~ ~ 80 I
:E:::i
I
00.. I
0:::E
I
2000 N. ML u..o
Vl U 60 .2.2 LID
....... U
I
---
all...l.J
O::al
0
u.. z 40
0
U
.......
ZZ
I...I.J 0::
U:::J 20
0:: .......
I...I.J I...I.J
c.... 0::
.-
~
0
N
0 15 30 45 60 75
90
-0
-
I
ORBIT INCLINATION - DEGREES
0-
~
;f
~
I ~ SECRET
0
00
INDEX
Page No.
_BoeingN0.
Title
G.H. Stoner
2B4319-192
Boeing Pr esentations
2]34319-276
Comparative Study Presentations
2B4319-194 No Title
J.H. Go idle
2B4319-70
Configuration Evolution
2B4319-58
Design Objectives, March 1958
2B4319-59R1
Design Approach, December 1958
2 B4319-67R1
Proposal Configuration, March 1958
10
7S45-36
No Ti fie (Photo)
11 2B4319-60
Design Objectives, December 1958
12 2 B4319-61R1
Design Approach, December 1958
13
2 B4319-66
DEI Configuration, December 1958
14 7Sl182
No Ti fie (Photo)
15
2 B4319-63R1
Design Approach, April 1959
16 2B4319-69R1
SSI Configuration, April 1959
17 7S720
No Tifie (Photo)
18
2B4319-65R1
Design Approach, March 1960
19 2B4319-68R1
Current Configuration, March 1960
il
2O 2 B4319 -2 71
No Title
D2-6027-2 109
11 'i Ii '8 A iHi
IN DE X
Page No. Boeing No. Title
1 G. H. Stoner
2 2B4319-192 Boeing Presentations
3 2B4319-276 Comparative Study Presentations
4 2B4319-194 No Title
5 J .H. Goldie
6 2B4319-70 Configuration Evolution
7 2B4319-58 Design Objectives, March 1958
8 2B4319-59Rl Design Approach, December 1958
9 2B4319-67R1 Proposal Configuration, March 1958
10 7845-36 No Title (Photo)
11 2B4319-60 Design Objectives, December 1958
12 2B4319-61R1 Design Approach. December 1958
13 2B4319-66 DEI Configuration, December 1958
14 781182 No Title (Photo)
15 2B4319-63Rl Design Approach, April 1959
16 2B4319-69R1 88l Configuration, April 1959
17 78720 No Title (Photo)
18 2B4319-65R1 Design Approach, March 1960
19 2B4319-68R1 Current Configuration, March 1960
20 2B4319-271 No Title
D2-6027-2
109
Page No.
Boeing No.
Title
21 2 B4319-10R1
Refinement Within Current Design Approach
22 2 B4319-8
Phase Alpha Comparative Study Ideas
23 2B4319-9
Re-Evaluation of Design Approach
24
2 B4319-11R1 No Title
25 2B4319-275
Boost Weight vs L/D
26
J. Lesko
27
2 B4241-2 O4
General Arrangement
28 2B4241-196
F lightEnvelope
29 2B4319-257
Lift Coefficient Correlation
3O
2B4319-258 Lift Coefficient Correlation
31
32
2134319-95
2B4319-98
L/D Correlation M = 8 in Air
L/D Correlation lYl = 17.6 in Air
33
2B4241-197 Maneuver Co rridor
34 2 B4319 - 18
Hypersonic S tability Data
35 2 B4241-92 Mission Profile
36 2B4241-203
Maneuver Envelope
37 2B4319-125R1
Landing Co mparison Low L/D Airplane
38
H.W. Klopfenstein
39
2B4319-35 Critical Points
4O 2B4319-77
L/D Max Re-Entry
41 2B4319-76
C L max Re-Entry
42 2B4319-82
Bottom Surface Isotherms
D2-6027-2 110
-"..)
SIiCRF;)=
F
Page No. ~ o e i n g No. Title
21 2B4319-10R1 Refinement Within Current Design Approach
22 2B4319-8 Phase Alpha Comparative Study Ideas
23 2B4319-9 Re-Evaluation of Design Approach
24 2B4319-11Rl No Title
25 2B4319-275 Boost Weight vs LID
26 J. Lesko
27 2B4241-204 General Arrangement
28 2B4241-196 Flight Envelope
29 2B4319-257 Lift Coefficient Correlation
30 2B4319-258 Lift Coefficient Correlation
31 2B4319-95 L/D Correlation M = 8 in Air
32 2B4319-98 L/D Correlation M = 17. 6 in Air
33 2B4241-197 Maneuver Corridor
34 2B4319-18 Hypersonic Stability Data
35 2B4241-92 Mission Profile
36 2B4241-203 ManHuver Envelope
37 2B4319-125Rl Landing Comparison Low L/D Airplane
38 H. W. Klopfenstein
39 2B4319-35 Critical Points
40 2B4319-77 LID Max Re-Entry
41 2B4319-76 C
L
max Re-Entry
42 2B4319-82 Bottom Surface Isotherms
D2-6027-2 110
_Page No.
Boeing NO. Title
43 2B4319-81
Upper Surface Isotherms
44 2B4319-3 Effect of Transition Location
45
2B4319-49R1 Nose Skirt Heat Transfer
46 2B4319-31
Design Temperature & Emissivity of Materials
47 2 B4319-7
E missivity of Co ated Mo lybdenum
48
2B4319-24
Co ated Refractory Metals
49 5S20-10
No Title (Photo)
5O 2B4319-27 Cross Section of Critical Structure
51 2B4319-4 Insulated Panel Design Approach
52 2B4319-30
Nose Cap Te mperature Capability
53
Le ading Edge Tests
54 G.H. Stoner
55 2 B4319-90R1
D.S. Step I Development
56 2 B4319-83R1
D.S. Step I Development
57
2 B4319-84R1
D.S. Step I Development
58 2 B4319-85R 1
D.S Step I Development
59
2B4319-191 Nature of Work in Next 9-12 Months
6O 2]34319-269
Key Technical Areas
61 2B4319-223
D.S. Step I Development Plan
62 2B4319-277
Key Technical presentations
63 2B4319-278
Key Technical Presentations
64 2B4319 -279
Key Technical Presentations
D2--6027-2
iii
Page No. Boeing No. Title
43 2B4319-81 Upper Surface Isotherms
44 2B4319-3 Effect of Transition Location
45 2B4319-49Rl Nose Skirt Heat Transfer
46 2B4319-31 Design Temperature & Emissivity of Materials
47 2B4319-7 Emissivity of Co ated Mo lybdenum
48 2B4319-24 Coated Refractory Metals
49 5S20-10 No Title (Photo)
50 2B4319-27 Cross Section of Critical Structure
51 2B4319-4 Insulated Panel Design Approach
52 2B4319-30 Nose Cap Temperature Capability
53 Leading Edge Tests
54 G.H. Stoner
55 2B4319-90Rl D. S. Step I Development
56 2 B4319-83Rl D.S. Step I Development
57 2B4319-84Rl D. S. Step I Development
58 2B4319-85R1 D. S. Step I Development
59 2B4319-191 Nature of Work in Next 9-12 Months
60 2B4319-269 Key Technical Areas
61 2B4319-223 D. S. Step I Development Plan
62 2B4319-277 Key Technical
63 2B4319-278 Key Technical Presentations
64 2B4319-279 Key Technical Presentations
D2-6027-2 111
Pa_e No. Boe__mg NO. _
Title
65
A.H. Lee
66 2 B4319-13
Key Technical Area
67
2B4319-74
F 1ightRe gime
68 2 B4319-15R1 Longitudinal Stability
69
2 B4319-175R1 Predicted Hypersonic Stability Intermediate
L/D D.S. Glider
7O
2B4319-18
Hypersonic Stability Data
71
2]34319 -104R 1
Typical Early Hot Shot I & IIStabilityData
M =20
72
2B4319-129R1
Typical Early Hot Shot Stability Data
73
2 B4319-165R1
Hypersonic Stability Data M = 20
74
2134319-197
Lower Surface Pressure Data Hot Shot II
75 2B4319-73R1 Helium Air Stability Data
76 2B4319-108 NASA Helium Air Stability Data
77
2B4319-17
Data Required
78 2B4319-115
Hypersonic Ground F acility Capability
79
2B4319-105R1 Wind Tunnel Test Plan
8O
2 B4319-196R1 Wind Tunnel Test Model.
81 2 B4319-71
Free Flight Model Tests
82 2 B4319-14LR1 Aerodynamic T est Vehicle
83 J.L. Powe11 - Martin Co.
84
Booster Data
85
H.W. Klopfens rein
D2-6027-2
112
Page No. Boeing No. Title
65 A.H. Lee
66 2B4319-13 Key Technical Area
67 2B4319-74 Flight Regime
68 2B4319-15Rl Longitudinal Stability
69 2B4319-175R1 Predicted Hypersonic Stability Intermediate
L/D D. S. Glider
70 2B4319-18 Hypersonic Stability Data
71 2B4319-104R1 Typical Early Hot Shot I & II Stability Data
M =20
72 2B4319-129R1 Typical Early Hot Shot Stability Data
73 2B4319-165Rl Hypersonic Stability Data M = 20
74 2B4319-197 Lower Surface Pressure Data Hot Shot II
75 2B4319-73R1 Helium Air Stability Data
76 2B4319-108 NASA Helium Air Stability Data
77 2B4319-17 Data Required
78 2B4319-115 Hypersonic Ground Facility Capability
79 2B4319-105Rl Wind Tunnel Test Plan
80 2B4319-196R1 Wind Tunnel Test Model
81 2B4319-71 Free Flight Model Tests
82 2B4319-141Rl Aerodynamic Test Vehicle
83 J. L. Powell - Martin Co.
84 Booster Data
85 H. W. Klopfenstein
D2-6027-2
112
..Pa__e No. _Bo__eing NO_______:.
Title
86 2B4319-273
Heating Tolerance Effect onDesign
87 2B4319-29
Effect of Heat Transfer Variation onNoseCap
Temperature
88 2B4319-174
Efleet of Increased q on Lateral Maneuver
Capability
89
2B4319-53
Effect of Emissivity onTemperature
9O 2B4319-30
NoseCap Temperature Capability
91 2B4319-26
Design Approach
92
2B4319-25 Critical Technical Area
93 2B4319-23
CoatingRequirements
94 2B4319- 19
Section of Base Metal andCoating
95 2B4319-78
Elongation of Molybdenum - 0.5%Ti
96 2B4319-21
Test Experience
97
2B4319-20
Typical Test Data
98 2B4319-1
Development Approach
99 2B4319-2
Coating Development Program
100
2B4319-79
Refractory Metal Program
i01 2 B4319
Payload
102
2 B4319
Step I
103 2B4319
Weights
104
J oF Milton
105
2 B4319-158
Lat. Man. & Orbit Change
106
2B4319-205 Total Lateral Maneuver
D2-6027-_2 113
Page No. Boeing No. Title
86 2B4319-273 Heating To lcrance Effect on Design
87 2B4319-29 Effect of Heat Transfer Variation on Nose Cap
Temperature
88 2B4319-174 Effect of Increased q on Lateral Maneuver
Capability
89 2B4319-53 Effect of Emissivity on Temperature
90 2B4319-30 Nose Cap Temperature Capability
91 2B4319-26 Design Approach
92 2B4319-25 Critical Technical Area
93 2B4319-23 Coating Requirements
94 2B4319-19 Section of Base Metal and Coating
95 2B4319-78 Elongation of Molybdenum - O. ~ Ti
96 2B4319-21 Test Experience
97 2B4319-20 Typical Test Data
98 2B4319-1 Development Approach
99 2B4319-2 Coating Development Program
100 2B4319-79 Refractory Metal Program
101 2B4319 Payload
102 2B4319 Step I
103 2B4319 Weights
104 J of. Milton
105 2B4319-158 Lat. Man. & Orbit Change
106 2B4319-205 Total Lateral Maneuver
D2-6027-2
113
iiiii_
Pa__e No.
107
Boeing No.
2B4319-164R1
Title
Lat. Maneuver Effects Return Interval -
Edwards
108
2 B4319-162R1 Lat. Maneuver Effects Return Capability -
Edwards
/
D2-6027-2
114
Page No. Boeing No.
107 2B4319-164R1
108 2B4319-162Rl
D2-6027-2
Title
Lat. Maneuver Effects Return Interval -
Edwards
Lat. Maneuver Effects Return Capability -
Edwards
114