MPR-SAT-FE-

66- 13

October

25, 1966

Th_contains of in the any United manner Sta to an _ "_i

information in person

affecting of is th

the

nat_e _ by aw_ Title " law. 18, ents

unauthorized

prohibited

M_PR-SAT-FE- 66- 13 RESULTS OF THE THIRD SATURN IB LAUNCH AS-202 By Saturn George Flight Evaluation Space Working Flight Group Center VEHICLE TEST FLIGHT

C. Marshall (U)

ABSTRACT

Saturn IB AS-202 was launched at 1215:32 EST on August 25, 1966 from KSC LC34, under surface conditions of light winds, moderate temperature and humidity, and good visibility. The vehicle lifted off after a total delay of 45 min due to holds, on a launch azimuth i00 deg east of north and rolled to a flight azimuth 105 deg east of north. The actual trajectory was near nominal. All major systems performed within design limits and close to predicted values throughout flight. Although no malfunctions or deviations occurred that adversely affected flight or mission, certain refinements for future flights are indicated in camera coverage, camera recovery, guidance, and SPS ignition sequence. The AS-202 test flight demonstrated the structural integrity and compatibility of the stages of the launch vehicle and the spacecraft during powered flight and coast. It permitted evaluation of performance of the launch vehicle propulsion, guidance, control, separation, structural and electrical systems, and the efficiency of mission support facilities and operations. The report is contained in two volumes: Volume unclassified data; Volume II only classified. I contains only

Any questions or comments pertaining to the information in this report are invited and should be directed to:

contained

Director, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, Alabama 35812 Attention: Chairman, Saturn Flight Evaluation Working R-AERO-F (Phone 876-4575)

Group

d,.,.dr.,,_L n_m m-_.,-,_ nq-n

t_{_t..?_/m--CENTER

GEORGE

C.

MARSHALL

SPACE

FLIGHT

MPR-SAT-FE-66-13

RESULTS

OF

THE

THIRD

SATURN

IB LAUNCH AS-202 VOLUME II

VEHICLE

TEST

FLIGHT

(U)

SATURN

FLIGHT WORKING

EVALUATION GROUP

.,.,,.,.; _,Z;qT;AL dl,=,, d,.,._

(U)

TABLE

OF

CONTENTS II Page

VOLUME

i_O 2,O

(U) (C)

Introduction Launch Vehicle Guidance Error Analysis

1 2

(U) Figure 2-i 2-2 (C) (C) ST-124M3 Platform (Tracking Stabilized

LIST

OF

FIGURES Page

Platform

System

Error

Sources

4 6

Velocity Component Minus Guidance)

Differences

(U) Table 2-1 2-11 2-111 (C) (C) (C) Guidance Guidance Intelligence Platform

LIST

OF

TABLES Page

Errors Comparison Cutoff and

3 5 8

Velocity

Guidance Comparisons Spacecraft Separation)

(S-IVB

iii

1.0 Volumes I and II of this

(U)

INTRODUCTION present the results of the early

report,

engineering evaluation of AS-202, the third Saturn IB vehicle flighttested. Volume II presents only those data which are classified. The evaluation is centered on the performance of the major vehicle systems, with special emphasis on malfunctions and deviations.

This report is published by the Saturn Flight Evaluation Working Group--composed of representatives of Marshall Space Flight Center, John F. Kennedy Space Center, and MSFC's prime contractors--and in cooperation with the Manned Spacecraft Center. Significant contributions to the evaluation have been made by: George C. Marshall and Space Flight Center Operations

Research

Development

Aero-Astrodynamics Laboratory Astrionics Laboratory Computation Laboratory Propulsion and Vehicle Engineering Industrial John Manned Chrysler Douglas F. Kennedy Spacecraft Corporation Aircraft Operations Space Center

Laboratory

Center Space Division

Company Machines Corporation Aviation time is represented by this

International Rocketdyne The official

Business Division MSFC

of North position at

American this

report. It will not be followed by a similar report unless continued analysis or new evidence should prove the conclusions presented herein to be significantly incorrect. Final stage evaluation reports will, however, by published by the stage contractors. Reports covering major subjects and special subjects will be published as required.

/_II_i

iPi

I_lPIk

I--PI

il

2.0

(C)

LAUNCH

VEHICLE

GUIDANCE

ERROR

ANALYSIS

of of

The velocity errors shown in this report the established postflight trajectory data the guidance hardware errors.

are and

within the accuracy the preflight estimates

Preflight estimates of the component and system errors were obtained from a series of laboratory tests made several weeks prior to vehicle launch. Prelaunch telemetry was sampled for an indication of platform orientation errors. This telemetry, adjusted for preflight estimates of accelerometer bias and scale factor errors, indicated that the ST-124M3 stabilized platform was aligned analyses also verify this. well within the 3 _tolerance. Postflight

The predicted errors of the ST-124M3 inertial platform sys_m for the AS-202 flight test were based on laboratory calibration of the ST-124M3 stabilized platform system. These errors are shown in Table 2-1 and Figure 2-1 along with guidance error solutions based on both the postflight each error reference component trajectory and is also shown. GLOTRAC data. The 3 _ value for

Telemetered platform velocities at principal event times are in Table 2-11 for comparison with corresponding values taken from postflight and preflight reference trajectories. The differences

shown the between

the telemetered velocities and postflight trajectory data are within the noise level of the data compared. The cross range velocity telemetered from the guidance computer included about 28 excess negative pulses (-1.4 m/s) accumulated due to vibrations during the first 8 sec of flight (See Vol. I, Section 12.4.2,2). The differences between the telemetered data and the preflight of the vehicle as well formance. trajectory reflect as small errors in the the non-standard performance guidance hardware per-

The telemetered postflight reference

guidance velocities were trajectory and GLOTRAC

differenced against both data. These differences

the

(tracking minus guidance) are shown plotted versus range time in Figure 2-2. The _ 3 o velocity component errors at S-IVB cutoff are shown for comparison. Guidance error analyses were made to determine sets of guidance system errors that would simulate the observed velocity differences for both the postflight reference trajectory and GLOTRAC data. Before comparisons were made, the telemetered cross range velocity was adjusted for the excess pulses accumulated during the first 8 sec of flight. Velocity differences associated with the error solutions are shown as points enclosed in squares and and GLOTRAC data, respectively. GLOTRAC the error solution solutions fit the with the tracklng was terminated at velocity difference data are no better triangles for lost lock at the trajectory about 415 sec and

that point. Although the error curves, the accuracies associated than + 0.5 m/s at S-IVB cutoff.

TABLE 2-1

(C)

GUIDANCE

INTELLIGENCE

ERRORS

Parameter

Symbol

Units

Laboratory and Pre-Launch Mess. Error Sources

Error Source Establlshed Fm. TraJ Analysis

Error Sources Established F_n. GLOTRAC Analysis

3 Error Band

I.

System Errors a. Platform Leveling i) About X Axis 2) About Z Axis b, c. Flight Azimuth Alignment

des LX LZ AzA des des Toward Z Axis MXy Myz Myx deg/hr _X 2 _Z deg/hr/g _X/X _X/Y _Y/X _Y/Y _Z/X <Z/q -0.004 -0.0015 -0.007 -0.0005 0.018 0.007 0.028 0.054 0.020 -O.044 -O,O39 -0.071 0.020 0.051 -0.031 -0.06 0.013 -0.04 O,100 0.060 0.060 0.075 0.075 0.060 0.013 0.029 0.037 0.O14 -0.0_5 0.035 0.081 -0.C36 0.036 O.lO0 0.075 0.075 -0,4 x 10-3 -0.297 x l_ "2 -0.5 x 10"_ -0.4 x 10 -3 -0.3 x 10 .2 -0.5 x 10 -3 -0.4 x 10 -3 -0.8 x 10 "3 -0,5 x lO -3 0.01 0.42 x 10-2 0.89 x 10-2 Toward X Axis Toward Z Axls 0.4 x 10 -3 -0.6 x 10 -3 -0.1 x lO -2 O.105 x 10-3 -0.85 x 10.3 -0,47 x 10-3 0.5 x 10-2 0.5 x 10 -2 0.01

Accelerometer Misallgnment l) Range (X) Aecel Rotated 2) 3) Altitude Altitude (Y) Accel (y) Accel

Rotated Rotated

d.

Gyro Drift Rates, Constant I) yaw (X) Gyro (About X Axis) 2) Roll (y) GymJ (About y Axi_) 3) pitch (Z) Gyro (About Z Axis) Gyro I) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Drift Rates, g-Dependent yaw (X) Gyro (About X Axis Due to _) yaw (X) Gyro (About X Axis Due to Yl Roll (y) Gyro (About y Axis Due to X) Roll (y) Gyro (About Y Axis Due to Y_ Pitch (Z) Gyro (About Z Axis Due to X) Pitch (Z) Gyro (About Z Axis Due to y)

e.

2.

Component Errors a. Accelerometer I) 2) 3) b.

Bias BX By BZ

m/s/s 0.24 x 10 -3 0.5 x 10 -4 -0.9 x 10 -4 g/g gX 8y SZ 0.9 x 10 -5 0.22 x 10 -4 -0.I x 10 -5 -0.24 x 10 -4 -0.35 x 10 -4 -0.1 x 10 -5 -0.58 x I0 "4 0.23 x 10 -5 -0.I x 10 -5 0.3 x IO -4 0.3 x 10 -4 0.3 x 10 -4 0.22 x 10-3 0.5 x 10 -4 -0.12 x 10-3 0.19 x 10 -3 0.33 x 10 -4 -0.96 x 10 -4 0.3 x 10 -3 0.3 x 10 -3 0.3 x 10 -3

Range (X) Aeeelerometer Altitude (y) Accelerometer Cross Range (Z) Accelerometer

Accelerometer Scale Factor I) Range (X) Aceelerometer 2) Altitude (Y) Acelerometer 3) Cross Range (Z) Accelerometer

Aecelerometer 0.0005 BX

Bias (m/s/s)

Accelerometer 0.00005

Scale Factor

(g/g)

Accelerometer 0.01 ....... MXy

Misalignment

(deg)

By

BZ

SX

Sy

SZ

.... Myx

Myz

Nil
r -0.0005

....
-0.01 .......

o
....

-0. 00005

Initial Platfom Misalignment (deg)

Constant Gyro Drift Rate (deg/hr)

g-Dependent Gyro Drift Rate (deg/hr/g)

O.Ol

O.lO

6x ....

5y

_z

O.lO

....

gx/_

_Y/_

6z/_

o
-0.01

..-.-

o
-0.i0 ......

rl

o
0.i0

_
....

n__
F] Prelaunch Trajectory _

n
Measured Analysis Error Source

GLOTRAC Analysis 3e

FIGURE 2-i

(C)

ST-124M3

STABILIZED

PLATFOF_I SYSTEM

ERROR SOURCES

,
TABLE (C) GUIDANCE PLATFORM 2-II VELOCITY COMPARISON

Event Range Time (sec) *

Telemetered Accelerometer 1553.55 Computer 1553.55 2359.45 -24.75 1627.10 2401.60 -25.65 1776.45 2488.15 -26.65 6768.05 4126.70 -2.15 6774.80 4127.90 -2.15

Trajectory Postflight 1552.62 2358.90 -23.08 1625.58 2400.48 -23.97 1776.64 2488.02 -25.08 6768.20 4125.57 0.42 6774.98 4126.76 0.23 Preflight 1565.95 2337.86 -11.86 1622.04 2369.99 -12.39 1769.02 245469 -15.22 6784.16 4209.67 -1.79 6789.81 4210.49 -1.91

IECO 139.57

2359.45 -23.35 1627.10

OECO 143.47

2401.60 -24.25 1776.45

Guidance 172.40

Initiation

2488.15 -25.25 6768.05

S-IVB Cutoff 588.47

4126.70 -0.75 6774.80

Spacecraft Separation 598.70

4127.90 -0.75

* _ y

- Range Velocity (m/s) - Altitude Velocity (m/s) - Cross Range Velocity (m/s) values are based on nominal with the actual event times. event times which do not necessarily

** Preflight coincide

Range Velocity i.O ] F _'-

Difference (m/s)

[_ Trajectory

Curve Fit Fit

GLOTRAC Curve

Range Time (sec) -1.O i00 ! Altitude Velocity Difference n/s) 200 300 400 500

- -3 o

- +3 o

1.0-_

100 -I.0

'

'

200

J_--_#

"_t_-"._---;_--,L_-. J

_,__\

f= ._% , -_F_- -_,;\.._ "_a_-._

500 _ Range Time - _!" !D_ _-_,,

(sec)

' Cross Range Velocity Difference 1.0 i --

(m/s)

-30 m +3 q

_.
...... _. :_ ..-._._.._:_ '" .F,_#.

o ......... _
-1.O 1

........ I ....
200

1
300

1
400

I
500 Range Time (sec)

I
FIGURE 2-2 (C) PLATFORM VELOCITY COMPONENT DIFFERENCES (TRACKING MINUS GUIDANCE) -3o"

f'_f%i_ I i'-lir_r"i_

i"l"l

The AS-202 vehicle was successfully guided tions as shown by the comparisons in T_le spacecraft separation.

to satisfactory 2-111 for S-IVB

end condicutoff and

The component differences between the postflight trajectory and guidance computer values are well within the 3_ tolerances. Since the IGM guidance scheme does not constrain the flight to a prescribed trajectory, the differences between the preflight and telemetered position and velocity components merely reflect non-standard vehicle performance and environmental conditions. The total velocity shown for the preflight trajectory indicates a cutoff velocity error of 0.32 m/s. However, the preset value for the guidance computer was 6800.00 m/s, compared with the actual cutoff velocity of 6799.95 m/s.

_i4VI'_II

llWii.

....

TABLE (S-IVB

2-III Cutoff

(C) and

GUIDANCE Spacecraft

COMPARISONS Separation)

S-IVB

Cutoff

Spacecraft

Separation

Parameter

Symbol

Units

__ Trajectory Preflight Postflight 6799.63 6592.061 3.996 6800.22 6591.943 3.986

Guidance Computer 6799.95 6592.151 3.994

Trajectory Preflight Postflight 679858 6596.716 3.832 6800.23 6596.695 3.822

Guidance Computer 6799.89 6596.910 3.834

Total Radial path

Velocity Distance Angle

VS RS 8 * XS YS ZS

m/s km deg

Displacement: Range Altitude Cross Velocity: Range

km km km

1875.677 6319.418 -45.284

1831.924 6332.129 -43.698

1831.806 6332.373 -44.723

1941.970 6304.227 -46.156

1899.872 6317.032 -44.572

1899.770 6317.280 -45.623

Range Altitude Cross Range

XS YS iS

m/s m/s m/s

6636.88 -1476.19 -87.60

6647.26 -1431.63 -85.61

6647.21 -1430.48 -87.81

6616.02 -1563.18 -86.99

6627.52 -1520.48 -85.07

6627.41 -1519.31 -87.41

Earth-Center

Plumbline

Coordinate

System

APPROVAL RESULTS OF THE THIRD SATURN IB LAUNCH AS-202 VOLUME II VEHICLE

MPR-SAT-FE-66TEST FLIGHT

13

By

Saturn

Flight

Evaluation

Working

Group

The information in this report has been reviewed for security classification. Review of any information concerning Department of Defense or Atomic Energy Commission programs has been made by the MSFC Security Classification Officer. The highest classification has been determined to be Confidential.

Stanley L. F_agge ' Security Classification This report has

/ Officer been reviewed and approved for technical accuracy.

J, _/_indberg Ch_man, Saturn

Fligh_aluationtEv "

Working

Group

llermann Director,

K.

Weid_er Research and Development Operations

L.

B. James I/IB Program Manager

Saturn

i0
DI STRIBL'FION Dr. Dr. Mr. E-S MI---_aul, M Mr. Mr. I G_'n. O'Conn_r, !-DIR Dr. Mr,!zek, I-DIR Mr. debt:son, I-I,IB-C Mr. Mr. Mr. Vreuis, Dunlap, Fkke_, I-I-IB-E I-I,,IB-G I-['I5-T I _p[: E-DIR Abbott, E-P S'_i_i), E-S : R-ASTR Mr. R. Mr. Mr_ Mr. Mr. Mr. Hr. Mr. Hr. Mr. Mr. Mr. (_) (2) Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Hr. (Cont_ Smith, R-P&VE (Cent) Hr. Aberg, R-P&VE-V Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr, Mr. Mr. G_over, Marmann, Devenish, Sells, R-P&VE-VA R-P&VE-VAW B-P&VE-VNH (2) (2) R-P&VE-VOO

vo1_ Bra,n, DIS Roes, DER-T Cor_la_, DEF A

R-A_TR-E

Stroud, R-ASTR-EA RobLnson, R-ASTR-ESA Hosenthiei1. Blockstone, Mandel, Ferrell, Hoberg, Fowei[, Av'rv, Pri_e, R-ASTR-F R-ASTR-F

R-ASTR-G R-ASTR-GSA R ASTR-I B-ASTR-I R-ASTR-IMD R-ASTR-IE

Schu_ee, R-P&VE-VS Rothe, R-P&VE-XF Griner, B-P&VB-XJ Boone, R-P&VE-XK

El),, R-ASTR-IRD Threikeld, R-ASTR-ITP goehm, R-ASTR-M Moore, R-ASTR-N Krume, R-ASTR-NFE Lomirli_kp R-ASTR-NFS

Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. R-RP

Grau.

R-QUAL-DIR

Henritze_ R-QUAL-A Corder, R-QUAL-DIE Kh_.ss, R-QUAL-J Bro_ks, R-QUAL-P peck, R-QUAL-QVS Chandler, R-QUAL-R Brien, R-QUAL-R Smith, Wittmann, R-QUAL-R R-QUAL-T

Maj. ICmLnek, Mr. Tllompson_ D_. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr, Mr. Hr. Dr. Mr. Dr. Mr. }lr. Mr.

I-1/IB-T I-I/IB-S-I,'IB

R:!dolph, I-V-MGR Peters, I-V-S-IVB Gnl_y. S_fl_, I-V-IU I-I:[B-S-IVB I-I_IB-U McCulloch,

_Ir. ._icalse, R ASTRNGI Mr. Taylor, R-ASTR-R _Ir. Mack, .Mr. Noel, Mr. Woll_, R ASTR-S R-ASTR-S R-ASTR-S

Ferrell, l-E-J Snlt'_h, I-E-H Speer, Woad, Riemtr, Balch, Auter, I-MO-MGR (4) I-SC-I) (3) I-M_CB-MGR I-MICH-QP I-MT-HGR I-MT-H

R COI_P I)r. Roelze_, R_COMP-I)IR .Mr. Fortenberry, RCOMP-A Mr. Mr. Pri,ce, Cochran, R-COMP-R R-COMPoRR

D--_'7-. Stuhl=n_r. Mr. Hetle_,

R_RY-DIR__

R-RP-T

I copy

Co:_stan,

R-TEST Mr. Heimburg_ Mr. Dr. Mr. Griffon, Sieber, Ecwords, Drisccll[_

B-TEST-DIR R-TEST-C B-TEST-I R-TEST-M R-TEST-S

R-M_.__E Mr. Kuers, Mr, err,

R-ME-DIR R-ME-M R-ME-T R-ME-X

R&B Mr--'7 Weidner, Dr, Mr, Mr, Mr, Mr. Dr. Mr. _r, Mr. Mr, Mr, Mr. Johnson, R-DIS R-EO-DIR

Mr, Mr,

Franklin, Wuencher,

Mr,

MS _-S-R R_P&VE Dr, Luc_s, R-P&VE-DIR Mr. Hellebrand. R-P&VE-DIR Hr. Pa[_oro. Goerner, Stern, Kingsblr\', Thompson, R-P&VE-DIR R-P&_'E-A R-P&VE-A R-P&VE-M R-P&VE-PA CCP Mr. Wofford, EC-P Mr. Mr, Mr, Mr. MS-I blS-IP MS-IL MS-D

William_, R-AS-DIS (2) Messer, R-OM-V Davidson. R-S (Mailed under" MSC) Richard, Geissler, Jean, R-TO-BIB R-AERO-DIR

(_)

R-_ERO R-AERO-I)IR

Da'_., R_AERO-A (2) Holderer, R-AERO-A Wilson, R-AERO-AT Need. R-AERO-AU Horn. R-AERO-D

Mr. Fuhrmann, R-F&VE-PM Fir. IBoU, R-P&VE-PPE Mr. McK_y, R-P&VE-PPE (2) .Mr, Bl_ck, R-P&VE-PPE Mr. Nt,lsor_ R-P&VE-PPB Hr. Mr. Mr, Mr, Mr. Wood, R-P&VE-PT M_Anelly, R-P&VE-PTD Plait. R-P&VE-PTF Hun_, R-P&VE-S Blumrich, R-F&VE-SA

KS CC Dr. Debts, Col. Mr. Mr. Pappel, Sparks,

DIR EDV EDV-I EDV-17

Bagnula,

,_r. De,_toe, R-AERO-DA Mr. Rynn, R-AERO-DD Dr, Hr. Mr, Mr, Mr. Mr. Mr. McDOnough, R-AERO-DDS Lindberg, R-AERO-F (33) Baker, R-AERO-G McNair, Teague. R-AEBO-P R-AERO-P (3)

Mr. Darby, El)V-162 .Mr. Se.ndler, INS (4) Dr. Bruns, INS-I Mr. Mr. Lt. Mr. Mr, Dr, Mr. Mr. LVO Dr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr, Mr. Mr, Col[i_, JeIen, INS-4 INS-13 (3)

Cue:*nlngs. R-AERO-T Vaughan. R-AERO-Y B-AERO-Y I copy j

Mr. Katz, R-P&VE-SER Fir. Sho_oers, R-p_VE-SL Mr, Frederick, R-P&VE-SS

Coi. Pecrone, PPR Mathe_s, PPR-4 BodY, PPR-6

.Mr. Scoggins,

Mr. O. E. S_ith, R-AERO-Y_ Mr. Dailiels, R-AERO-Y R*ABTR Dr, Hr. Mr. Haeusserm_nn, DiBesu, Fichtner R-ASTR-A R-ASTR-E

Hr. Furman. R-F&VE-SJ blr. Gass_way, R-P&VE-SV

Knothe, ]EC Lee, I-I-I/IB Gossett_ 1.X,O.22

R-ASTR-D!R Gruene_ Rigell, Edwards, Fannin_ Pickett, O'Har a, G. JA JA dE JD JF JF HJ

Willlams_

ii
EXTERNAL

Heacquarter_, Was_inKt>n,

National Aeron_:_tics D.C. 20%46

& Spa(e

Administration

Ofli'e el tne Ass_. and EngineL'ring R(_of 3E106_ The pei'.tagon D. C.

Sec.

ot

Defense

for

Research

Cape, Mr. Mr, Mr. I)r. Con. Henr>,, MAR-R Mr.

Preitag, Disher, MLD

MC

Washln_ton, Attn: Director Office of Tech of

20301

Kerr_ E Condon, KR Nuel]er_ M Phillips, l_

blr, B,tmgardner, MLT Dr. Adams, R Mr. Tischler, Pd_ Mr. Dr. Mr. Mr. Und_ r_,ood, RVA Ne_,c[l, S Garharini, SE Johnson, SV (lO

Library Guided Missiles o! Defense

the

Secretary

Capt. Hol_omb, MAO Mr. Willo_zhbl', MAR Mr. Thompson, MAS (3 Mr. Mr. Mr. Ddy, MAT (8 White, MAT King, MAT :ophs)

_epies)

copies)

Room 3EI]I The Pentagon Washin_[on, Central

D.

C.

20301 Agency (5 copies)

Mr. Kerr, U Mission Director: Brig. Gen.

(AS-202) MO-I (2 cpy)

Intelligence

Bolender, Allen

Washlngton, D. C. 20_05 Attn: OCR/DD p'_hiicatiou<

Director, Nat ionai Mo[fett Director, Nattona[ P. O. B_x Edwards, godcard Nationai

Ames Research Aeronautics & Field, California

Center: Dr. H, Julian Space Administration 940]5

Director, Ft. George Bikle Attn: I. S.

National Svcurity Mead, Maryland

Agenz'. 207_5

Flight Research Center: Paul F. Aerana'_tics & Space Administration 279 California Space Flight Aeronauti s ql 23

CS/TDL Atomi_ K_erKv Corxmissien, Sandi_ Lab. Corp.

Univers!tv Technical Administration P.O. Box Li',:erm_re, Attn: 17, S.

o: California Radiation Informatioc Division 808 Catifornia Crai_ Energy Coraraission, Box 969 Q4551 94_51

Center & Spa.e 20771 Code 30C

Greenhelt, Maryland Attn: Herman LaGow, John F. National Kenned) Attn:

Clovis Atomic

Randia

Corp.

Kenned_ Space Center A_rona,_tics & Space

Administration 3289g AS0 3B

Livermore L_vermore, kttn: Tech

Br, P. O. California Library

Space Center, Florida Techn__ea[ Library, Code Mrs. L. B. Russell Langley Aeronautics Star:an Virzini_ 2%365

Commander, Arlingt(_n L. Thompson

Ar_ned Services Mall Station 22212

Technical

lnf.

Agen.

Director, National Langley l{ampt on, Direct NaEional _r,

Research Center: Floyd & Spa_e A_iministration

Arlington, Virginia Attn: TIPCR (Transm:ttal Security Commanding Instruction) General Proving 8S002 BS-OMTIO-TL U. C. for for S.

per (5

Cognizant

Act

copies)

Lewis Research Center: Dr. Abe Aeronntlti_s & Space Administration Read _4 i i'_

Silverstein

White Sands New N_.xi_o Atte: Chiet ORD of

Ground (3 Air copies) FOrCL

21000 gr_okpark Cleveland, Ohio Le_is National 21000

Stair, D. marked marked

Research Center A(,ronaati=s Rr_mkpark Ro_d

& Space"

Administration

The Pentagon Washington, ! Cpv ! Cpv

20]_O DCS/D DCS/D AFDRD AFDRD-EX

Cleveland, Ohio 441"15 Attn: Robert Washi_o, Magi Stop ge-i E. R. Jonash, Centaur Project Manned Spa(ecraft Con:or National Aere.nauti_s & NoustcCn, Attn: Texas Director: 770_h Dr. Spa.e Re.bert

Mgr.

Commander-in-Chief Strateaic Oilutt ACtn: Air AFB, Director Cor,z_a_d Nebraska of 6_1[3 Missile Di\'isio,n

Administration R. Gilruth Code _4 (9 <op_t,_) Code BMI R-L (MSFC FS-2 (3 copies)

Operations,

Rob,-rt E. blcKann, John D. Lohb, PM4 C},Jrles M. Grant, _n. p. Dmvidson, N. Dilector, National Wallops D/l'e:tor, National i')() Pico Santa J. Quinn_ Code _'al]ops Station: A_ronm]tics & Space Island, Western Aeronauti,s Blvd. Virginia

Corm_ander Arnold Engineerin_ Arnold Attn:

Development

Center !71Sq

(_ copies) Liaison Office)

Air Forc_ Station, Tennessee" Tecil Library (2 copies)

R. L. grieger Administration

CoP_nander Air Fore[ Edwards Attic: W. Karmm Commander Air Force

Flight

Test

Center 93523

23337 Of f !<e: Robert Administration

AFB, FrOTL

California

Operations & Spa_e

Missile

Development Base (SRLT)

Center

Meal<a, and %70C

California Te:'}n_i_iIl

90406 Information Facility

Rolloman Air Force Net* M_.xi __ 8.q 33C At_n: Tech Library

$ctencifi. P. O. Box Be_hcsda, At'in: Jet _800

Maryland 2OO1_ NASA Representative Laboratory Drive

(S-AK/RKT)

(25

copies)

Commander, AF Missile Test Patrick AFB, Fiorid:_ 32q2: Attn: Tt _hni al Inlorma(ion NTGRY (i _opies)

Center Intelligen_ Oifi_,

Propuislon Oak Grove Irl H.

Pasadena, A:_n:

California q[lO% New[nn, Reports GroL_p (Mail 11[-!22) Levv, CC_ITA (Malt 179-203) (q copies)

Conml_ ndc r Dot. 11, 4ti_ _4eathvr Code; ETQFt4 Patrick AFB, Florida AFETR Patrick ( ETLLf;AFB, l) Florid,

Group 3262 <

32{'25

12
EXTERNAL (CONE) Chrysler Michoud 45433 Dept. P.O. New Attn: Systems Attn: Engineering $EPIR AM, Ohio 45433 Group (RTD) Chrvslur Corporation Spa_L O_vlslon H{=nts_iil_ Operations 1312 N. Meridian St. Huntsville, Ai_bama Attn: H. M. G. Deugla_ Marshall D, L. Bader, bell. Corporation OperatiL.ns 350 7012Smitl (5 copies) Spa;e Division

Headquarters 6570ch Aerospace U. S. Wright Attn: Air Force Patterson H.

Medina! Air

[)ivisio_ Base,

(AFSC) aisle

Force

2712, Biog. Box 79200 La. Leroy Mr,

E. Vongierke

Orleans,

Wright_Patternson Director U. S. Naval Wasllingtol:. Attn: Code

JSgD7

Research Laboratory D. C. 20390 2027

Dept. 46UU (J =opie$) Dept. 4,_l(_ {2 _opies) Dept. -1820 (2 _opies)

Mar_in,

Chiel of Department

Naval Research o! Nay F D. C. 963 or 2039D

Aircraft C0mpa_::,', i_, Spa:e F! i_zht Center Room 5 Alabama A. Tobx_s 55_L2 (40 copies) CoYp. 1171_

Washington, Alia: Code Chef, Burean

Bldg. 448!, }l_etsvill_, Alan: J.

Weapons 20390 l Cp. I Cpy grub,'can Air:r_tt Beg:ni,_ liN_ Betl,pa_:c, Long Islam!. _;. y. Attl;: NASA Rvsiden _ Offi _ John Int, rnationai johansen B_lstness Ha;hine 229 3_80_ (7 copies)

Department Washxngton [ Cpy i Cp) Coro_ander L'. S. Point

of Navy O. ft. Lu RESI, t_ AB3,

to t_

SP, R_3

Naval Mug_,

Air Missile California RSIC (3

Test Center 93041

System Design, Dept. 130 Sparlmlan Dr. EW Huntsvi tie, Aiahama Attn: R. E. Poupard

AMSMI-P_BLD; Bldg. 4.', B:. Redstone

_opies) 35809 Motors Corporation

Arsenal,

k_abama

Marti!!

Company

AC Spark Plug Division, General Attn: Mr. Martin Caserio Vi_e Pr*sident Plint_ Mi'.higan Aerospace 2400 East General 48556 Manager

Spac_ Systems Division B_li_more, Maryland 21203 Attn: %4. P. So_mlers N'crth American Spa_e 12214 Downe?, A\ .lion

Corporation E! Segundo 90245

& _*nformati_,n Di'.isiotx qystems S. Lakekoo,i Bled, California W. W. T. F. Schleich, Par_er uC2-([ _C-05 _op3) (2)

P_. Segundt% California Attn: D. C. Bakeman Aerospace Reliability C_rporation DeBt.

Attn:

Raah, Corp(,ration Defense Electra:ll; 90045 Date XSO0 Van Systems Balboa N_ys,

cf America Prodacts

P. O. Box 95085 Los Angeles , California Attn: Don lierzs_ein

Division Blvd. _l&OB

C_!iiornia

Bel I _omm, Inc. l[00 Sex, enteenth Washington, Attn: Miss The Boeing P. O, Box Huntsville, Attn: 3. K. The Boeing P, O, Box Ne_ Attn: Orleans, R. S. T H, D. C. Scott, Company 1680

St.

N.

W.

Rocketdyne 6633 CanoF_a Canoga Arts: Park, T. L. N. N. D. C,

Avenue California Johnson Johnson Revel (_ (2 91303 copi_-s)

20036 Librarian

copies)

E. H.

Alabama Scott, Hagenau,

35807 Mail Stop Mai[

AF-67 AF-6I

Foreign Technology FTD (TDBDP) Wright Patterson

D'.vision Air Force Base, Ohio 45433

Stop

Company 29100 Louisiana Nelson, Mail 70129 St#p Ia_-42 (3 gopies)

Johnson, Mail Seep LP-36 J. Kernel[, Mail Stop LS-55