Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
support of her notices, response, and motions presented to the Court, the Clerk, and all parties,
1.Petitioner has previously alleged, by unverified motion only, that Respondent is somehow
due and owing monies for child support, further alleging that Respondent is now in contempt for
the same, as to failing or refusing to pay the same said monies in a timely manner.
2.Petitioner’s proffered action for contempt is fatal, and may not yet be heard, due to the facts
that Petitioner has: (1) failed to verify or affirm the same in writing reduced to particularly
describing the same orders, factual events, and necessary dates, as required by law, and under
Affidavit or other sworn instrument as duly provided by law; (2) failed to move or petition for
this Court to issue its corresponding Rule to Show Cause; and (3) failed to ensure: (a) that this
Court first issue such Rule to Show Cause, and (b) that such Rule to Show Cause was also duly
1
3.All and the same are necessary prerequisites to holding any hearing on alleged contempt.
4.Moreover, Petitioner’s action for alleged contempt is utterly false, and a complete sham
upon this Court, as Respondent’s pay has been regularly garnished in the full amount requested.
implemented regular garnishment against her paycheck in the amounts as specified, and that
same garnishment has occurred on a regular basis, with the total amount taken during this 2006
calendar year alone, up to and including the pay cycle of October 31, 2006, as $8432.72, not
including the additional and regular amounts that were garnished during the latter part of 2005.
6.The facts of ¶ 5, supra, are clearly evinced by the attached paystubs, Exhibits # 1 and 2.
7.The Respondent is by no means in any contempt of this Court or of any order for support,
nor has ever been, and if Petitioner is having any trouble in receiving the same disbursements,
his remedy is to deal directly with the Florida State Disbursement Unit, as he should know.
8.Petitioner has falsely harassed Respondent, and also failed to follow contempt procedures,
and his unverified “motion” for contempt should now be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned, Theresa M. Martin, now notifies this Court, the Clerk, and
all parties of the above lack of compliance with contempt procedures, responds in general denial
to the alleged contempt action, and moves this Court DISMISS this alleged contempt action with
PREJUDICE accordingly, and further moves for all other relief just and proper in the premises.
Respectfully submitted,
______________________________
Theresa M. Martin
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify: that on this ______ day of November, 2006, a true and complete copy of the
Respondent’s Response and General Denial to Alleged Child Support Contempt, by serving the
same upon her in open court, has been duly served upon the following:
______________________________
Theresa M. Martin
Theresa M. Martin
10918 Norwood Avenue
Port Richey, FL 34668
727-457-2436