KPJ QUALITY CONVENTION 2011 JUDGING CRITERIA FOR INNOVATIVE AND CREATIVE CIRCLE (ICC) ON 11th OCTOBER 2011

GROUP NAME ORGANIZATION : ________________________________ : ________________________________ SUBJECT I 1 2 INTRODUCTION Background of the company, team and member's selection explained The team highlights the evidence of participation and effective planning of the project. PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION The team clearly explained how and why he project was selected. The project and terminologies used were clearly defined and explained Target setting was explained and justified based on appropriate analysis of benchmarkdata/information. IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS Improvement opportunities were identified based on sufficient data/information which is gathered through various means and appropriate tools. Systemic analysis and evaluation of potential causes were conducted to identify root causes with appropriate use of tools. Verification and validation ofselected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried out using various methods. Maximum Score 50 20 30 Score (Max. 10) A Factor B 2 3 Judge Name : ____________________________ WEIGHT SCORE (AxB) COMMENT

II. 3 4

150 80 40 8 4

30

III. 6

250 80 8

120

12

50

IV. 9

CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS/IMPLEMENTATION The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions / solutions. the team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based on appropriate criteria (advantages and disadvantages were considered). The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted objectives. The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully. The team has explained the difficulties or barriers and how they were overcome. MONITORING & STANDARDISATION The team has carried out a systemic and sufficient monitoring to ensure the improvement action is in place The team is able to make appropriate adjustment to ensure the improvement is in place and maintained.

200 50 5

10

70

11

30

12

50

V. 13

100 50 5

14

20

15

Steps were taken to ensure that the new procedures were endorsed, adopted, documented and shared Actions were taken to ensure that the new adopted procedures were standardised and maintained.

20

16

10

VI. 17

ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION Description of the types and quantum of achievement and value creation. Reconciliation of target and actual achievement were made (cost incurred explained). The solutions selected is recoqnised for its uniqueness at company / industry / national and international levels.

200 70 7

18

30

19

40

20

The impacts of the achievement and value creation to the environment, community and team members were stated The team provided evidence of verification and validation of achievement and value creation. PRESENTATION Well organised presentation with logical sequence that conforms to stipulated time. Clear presentation, effective usage of visual aids and good public speaking. TOTAL SCORE

30

21

30

VII. 22

50 30 3

23

20

1000

1 - 2 : WEAK 3 - 4 : FAIR 5 - 6 : AVERAGE

7 - 8 : GOOD 9 - 10 : EXCELLENT