Digestion Facility XYZ

Plant Design/Operational Parameters Name of Facility Agency Name Name of Contact Person Phone Number for Contact Person Email Address for Contact Person Plant Influent Flow, mgd Primary Sedimentation Primary Sludge Flow, gpd Primary Sludge Total Solids Concentration, % Primary Sludge Volatile Solids Content, % Primary Sludge Mass, Dry Tpd Activated Sludge System Activated Sludge Mean Cell Residence Time, days Aeration Basin Volume, MG Aeration Basin Hydraulic Residence Time, hrs Waste Activated Sludge Flow, gpd Waste Activated Sludge TS Concentration, mg/L WAS Volatile Solids Content, % Waste Activated Sludge Mass, Dry Tpd WAS Thickening Process for WAS Thickening Type of Polymer Used for Thickening Polymer Dosage (lb/dry Ton) Thickened WAS Flow, gpd Thickened WAS Concentration (%) Thickened WAS Volatile Solids (VS) Content (%) Thickened WAS Solids, Dry Tpd Thickener Solids Capture (%) Primary Sludge Thickening Process for PS Thickening Type of Polymer Used for Thickening Percent of Primary Sludge Sent to Thickener Number of Thickener Units Hours of Thickener Operation per day Polymer Dosage (lb/dry Ton) Thickened PS Flow, gpd Thickened PS Concentration (%) Thickened PS Volatile Solids (VS) Content (%) Thickened PS Solids, Dry Tpd Thickener Solids Capture (%) Anaerobic Digestion Anaerobic Digestion Process Scheme Number of Primary Anaerobic Digesters Average Temperature in Primary Digester, deg-F Number of Secondary Digesters or Sludge Holding Tanks Average Temperature in Secondary Digester, deg-F Volume of Primary Anaerobic Digesters, MG Volume of Secondary Anaerobic Digester or Sludge Holding Tanks, MG Digestion Facility XYZ Data Input

10

259,000 4.5% 74.0% 48.6

30.0 20.0 48.0 971,000 9,000 71.0% 36.4

GBTs

131,200 6.0% 71.0% 32.8 90%

No PS Thickening

3 95.0 3 95.0 1 5

CEC Co-Digestion Model Existing Facility Input

08/01/2011

Digestion Facility XYZ

Plant Design/Operational Parameters Total Sludge Feed to Digesters, gpd Total Sludge Feed to Digesters, Dry Tpd TS Total Sludge Feed to Digesters, Dry Tpd VS Fraction of Secondary Sludge in Feed Average VS Content of Digester Feed, % Average Feed TS Content, % Solids Retention Time in Primary Digesters, days Solids Retention Time in Secondary Digesters, days Primary Digester Loading Rate, lb VS/1000 cf/day Digested Sludge Flow, gpd Digested Sludge, Total Solids Concentration, % Digested Sludge, % Volatile Solids Digested Sludge, Dry Tpd Total Solids Digested Sludge, Volatile Solids Conc., % Digested Sludge, Dry Tpd VS Digester Volatile Solids Destruction, % Digested Sludge Dewatering Process for Dewatering Type of Polymer Used for Dewatering Belt Width (m) Number of Dewatering Units Hours of Dewatering Operation per day Polymer Dosage (lb/dry Ton) Dewatered Cake Solids Content (%) Solids Capture (%) Biosolids Cake, Dry Tpd Biosolids Cake, Wet Tpd Filtrate/Centrate Flow, gpd Data Input 390,200 81.4 59.3 0.4 73% 5% 2.6 12.8 887 390,200 3.30% 64.0% 53.7 2.1 34.4 42%

Centrifuge

2 24 15.0 20% 80% 43.0 215 1,176,000

Dewatered Cake Conveyance & Storage Method of transfer to truck Daily Cake Hauling, tpd Miscellaneous Iron salt used, lb Fe/day Point of Addition for Iron Salt Other Chemicals Used: Chemical 1 Name Point of Addition for Chemical 1 Chemical 1 Usage, lb/day Chemical 2 Name Point of Addition for Chemical 2 Chemical 2 Usage, lb/day

CEC Co-Digestion Model Existing Facility Input

08/01/2011

Comment

CEC Co-Digestion Model Existing Facility Input

08/01/2011

Comment

CEC Co-Digestion Model Existing Facility Input

08/01/2011

Digestion Facility XYZ

Foodwaste Quality/Quantity Information Foodwaste 1 Available Daily Volume, gpd Total Solids Content, % Volatile Solids Content, % Alkalinity, mg CaCO3/L pH Total Organic Carbon, mg/L Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, mg/L Ammonia-N, mg/L Density, lb/gal Crude Fiber Content, % Protein Content, % Fat Content,% Ash Content, % Carbohydrates,% Foodwaste 2 Available Daily Volume, gpd Total Solids Content, % Volatile Solids Content, % Alkalinity, mg CaCO3/L pH Total Organic Carbon, mg/L Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, mg/L Ammonia-N, mg/L Density, lb/gal Crude Fiber Content, % Protein Content, % Fat Content,% Ash Content, % Carbohydrates,% Foodwaste 3 Available Daily Volume, gpd Total Solids Content, % Volatile Solids Content, % Alkalinity, mg CaCO3/L pH Total Organic Carbon, mg/L Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, mg/L Ammonia-N, mg/L Density, lb/gal Crude Fiber Content, % Protein Content, % Fat Content,% Ash Content, % Carbohydrates,% Codigestion Operation Foodwaste Contribution, % Total Foodwaste Volume Needed, gpd Available Digester Volume, gal Digestion SRT, d Foodwaste 1 Contribution, % Foodwaste 2 Contribution, % Foodwaste 3 Contribution, % Total Foodwaste Solids, tpd Total Foodwaste Volatile Solids, tpd Total Foodwaste Nitrogen, lb/d Total Foodwaste Carbon, lb/d Total Foodwaste Protein, lb/d Total Foodwaste Fat, lb/d Total Foodwaste Carbohydrate, lb/d Total Biosolids Volatile Solids, tpd Total Volatile Solids, tpd Data Input 40,000 10.0% 85.0% 0 3.85 35,000 1,800 800 8.59 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 2.0% 2.0% Comment

LOW ALK

1.03

LOW ALK LOW pH

0.00

LOW ALK LOW pH

0.00

SRT<15 d

10.3% 40,000 6,000,000 14 100%

16.7 14.2 600 11,676 6,876 13,752 6,876 59 73

CEC Co-Digestion Model Codigestion Input

08/01/2011

Digestion Facility XYZ

Impacted Operations Codigestion Operation Total Foodwaste Solids Feed, tpd Total Biosolids Cake Solids Feed, tpd Biosolids Volatile Solids Reduction, % Foodwaste Volatile Solids Reduction, % Dewatering Operation Solids Capture, % Cake Solids Content Total Foodwaste Solids in Cake, tpd Total Biosolids Cake Solids in Cake, tpd Total Cake to Hauling, tpd Increase in Cake Hauling, tpd Increase in Polymer Usage, lb/d Unit Cost of Hauling, $/dry ton Unit Cost of Polymer, $/lb polymer Hrs of Operation (baseline) hr/d Dewatering Power Consumption, kW Unit Cost of Power, $/kW-h Unit Cost of Labor for Dewatering Operation, $/hr Additional Nitrogen in Recycle Stream, lb/d Unit Cost of Nitrogen Removal, $/lb N Cost of Additional Cake Hauling, $/d Cost of Additional Polymer Use, $/d Cost of Additional Operation, $/d Cost of Additional Nitrogen, $/d Total Additional Cost of Codigestion, $/yr 80% 20% 5.0 43.0 48.0 5.0 75.1 50.0 5.0 24.0 20.0 0.12 25.0 420 250 375 734 496,292 Data Input 16.7 81.4 42% 70%

CEC Co-Digestion Model Potential Impacts

08/01/2011

Comment

CEC Co-Digestion Model Potential Impacts

08/01/2011

Digestion Facility XYZ

Digestion Operation/ Energy Generation Codigestion Operation Foodwaste Contribution, % Total Foodwaste Volume Needed, gpd Available Digester Volume, gal Digestion SRT, d Foodwaste 1 Contribution, % Foodwaste 2 Contribution, % Foodwaste 3 Contribution, % Total Foodwaste Solids, tpd Total Foodwaste Volatile Solids, lb/d Total Foodwaste Protein, lb/d Total Foodwaste Fat, lb/d Total Foodwaste Carbohydrate, lb/d Total Biosolids Volatile Solids, lb/d Total Volatile Solids, lb/d Biogas Generation Biosolids Volatile Solids Reduction, % Foodwaste Volatile Solids Reduction, % Biosolids Biogas Yield, cf/lb VSR Foodwaste Biogas Yield, cfd Protein Methane Yield, lb/lb/d Carbohydrate Methane Yield, lb/lb/d Fat Methane Yield, lb/lb/d Total Biogas, cf/d Energy Generation Biogas Heating Value, BTU/cf Electricity Conversion Efficiency, % Specific Gravity of Biogas, lb/cf Thermal Energy, BTU/d Electrical Energy, kWh/d Electrical Power, kW Value 10.3% 40,000 6,000,000 14 100% 33,360 28,356 6,876 13,752 6,876 118,543 146,899 Comment

SRT<15 d

42.0% 70.0% 16.0 210,986 1,219 2,694 5,884 1,007,996

600 31% 0.077 604,797,610 187,487,259 7,811,969

CEC Co-Digestion Model Energy Generation

08/01/2011