Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
of Vocational Training
2
degrees of colourfulness and authors’ photos at the head of their articles, was inconsistent
with the scholarly nature of its content
This is what led the journal’s Editorial Committee to opt for B5 format, which is much
easier to handle, and to use only one colour on the cover in addition to black and white.
So the journal has acquired a new image, but it has not changed course or become any
less rigorous. It has simply brought its appearance into line with its practice – serious and
sober. So even though the change effected with this issue, No 37, January-April 2006, is
much more obvious than that effected in issue No 8 in May 1982, it is actually much less
radical. Your journal remains unchanged as regards its content, which naturally we are
constantly working to improve.
The Editorial Committee currently comprises 14 members – 10 lecturers/academic
researchers, one expert from the European Training Foundation (ETF), 2 experts from
Cedefop, and one representative of Cedefop’s Governing Board, who represents the
Government’s Group. The representatives in these three last categories all have a solid
academic training, and were recommended by the Editorial Committee for this reason.
The rule is that all new members of the Editorial Committee are appointed by Cedefop’s
Director on a recommendation from the Committee.
In July 1999, an Editorial Secretariat was created on the initiative of Steve Bainbridge, the
then Editor-in-chief of the journal. This Secretariat composed of four Academic
researchers, assists the Editorial Committee in its work and has become particularly
important since, at the instigation of its current Chairman Martin Mulder, the Editorial
Committee adopted the double-blind peer review as its working method. This means that
members of the Editorial Committee and, in particular, the reviewers, do not know the
identity of the authors of the articles submitted to them, and the authors do not know the
identity of their reviewers. The Editorial Secretariat is responsible for anonymising
proposed articles received and for acting as intermediary between authors and the
Editorial Committee and its reviewers. At the instigation of the Editorial Committee’s
current Chairman, Martin Mulder, the journal has also decided to establish an Editorial
Advisory Board comprising well-known personalities and researchers in the field of
vocational training who will serve as ambassadors, as it were, for the European journal, in
the vocational training world.
The EJVT publishes Original articles, non published in any other refereed Journal. We
accept nevertheless article already published in the grey literature on draft presentation, as
long as they are reformatted for the EJVT. The authors keep they wrights on their article
and may republish them if they want elsewhere after publication in the EJVT as long as
are mentioned the first publication in the EJVT and the publisher’s name, Cedefop.
The field of publishing occupied by the journal is, of course, that of initial and continuing
vocational training (ICVT). However, this field has been interpreted very broadly ever
since the journal began. Thus in addition to articles directly addressing vocational training
issues, naturally it publishes articles on lifelong training, on the relationship between
training and employment and labour-market access, and on the relationship between work
and training. However, it also publishes articles on educational sciences, the philosophy of
education, history, the sociology of education, economics, law and political sciences when
they are addressing an issue directly associated with ICVT or an issue of general interest
with direct consequences for ICVT.
The Journal publishes four kinds of articles: research, policy analysis, case studies, and
personal accounts. Articles should focus on European issues or address issues that can be
transferred to, or are of interest for, other countries. Articles submitted to the journal must be
3
precise, yet accessible to a wide and diverse readership. They must be clear in order to be
understood by readers from different backgrounds and cultures, not necessarily familiar with the
vocational education and training systems of different countries. Readers should be able to
understand clearly the context and consider the arguments put forward in the light of their own
traditions and experience.
The Editorial team, i.e. Editor in Chief, Editorial, Committee and Editorial Secretariat,
publishes a generic call for contributions in the Journal, and specific call for thematic
reviews both in the EJVT and through the different Cedefop networks, EROCALL,
ReferNet, TTnet, as well in their personal relations. The Editorial Advisory Board is also
invited to circulate these thematic call for contributions. They are also published on the
Web page of the European Journal in the Training Village Web site, as well as the
recommendations to authors, or format requested by the Editorial Committee
The submission process is very sensible. The author send his/her article proposal to the
editor in Chief by e-mail. And then begin the difficulties. It is not easy to get an article
published in the journal. The Editorial Committee requires strict compliance with its
format and sets very high standards for the scholarly nature of papers published in the
journal. It is very rare for an article to be published as it is, without a request for revisions.
Admittedly the rejection rate is quite low for an international journal, ranging at first
reading between only 30 % and 40 % of articles submitted. However, the Editorial
Committee asks authors to make many complex revisions with regard to both the
substance and the form of the article, and many author do not go to the end of the revision
process, which makes that we publish a less than the half of the proposals received.
Once the Editor in Chief has received an article proposal he checks whether the article
corresponds to the editorial policy of the EJVT, to the format and the standard quality
requested by the Editorial Committee. If the article proposal fits with the Journal requests,
the Editor in Chief chooses two referees who will report on the article proposal during the
nearest possible meeting of the Editorial Committee of the European Journal. The Editor
in Chief chooses as well a member of the Editorial Secretariat who will be the
intermediate between the author and the Editorial Committee to make sure that the
process is anonymous.
The scale of the Editorial Committee is as follows:
IV. Our aims and the kind of difficulties encountered in striving to reach them
To elucidate the choices made by stakeholders, particularly the vocational training policy
choices, the Journal considers that it is necessary and possible to bring together the
reflections of stakeholders and of researchers. The Journal has a broad target group
consisting of decision-makers, social partners, trainers, researchers, and private- and
public-sector stakeholders and contributes to the debate and discussion on vocational
training in Europe. The European Journal of Vocational Training has the ambition to give
the floor to every one among the people contributing to VET development, without
consideration for they personal status, function and language, forming a bridge between
these different cultures of science, policy and practice in the field of vocational training.
The current shape of the Journal reflect these aims and political choices. The main
characteristics of the EJVT being its unique language regime, its multidisciplinarity and
the very large conception of its editorial field, and its institutional openness.
5
– It disciplinary and institutional openness, makes that no specific scientific field can
really claim that it is congruent to the Journal. We have thus some difficulties to be
recognised by the disciplinary institutions: for example when applying for the scientific
recognition of the French CNRS, to which section should the EJVT apply: Economics,
Sociology, Educational Sciences, Management or more specifically “Human resources”
management. Now such a recognition is of huge importance for the researchers
publishing in our Journal for this has heavy consequences for their career.
Nevertheless despite all these difficulties the Journal enjoys a good reputation in the
international academic world as indicated by the Australian VET Research Association
(AVETRA) which in the frame of the Australian Research Quality Framework (RQF)
journal ranking exercise, rank the EJVT in the 8 th position among 22 international VET
periodical publications.
Now as a consequence of the necessity for the European institutions to find a budget for
the financing of two project voted by the European parliament without specific financing
line (the European GSP Galileo project and the project of a European Institute of
Technology), the conciliation committee of 23 November 2007 decided to reduce the
budget of 10 European Regulation Agencies, out of which Cedefop, by Euro 50 millions
on 5 years, i.e. approximately 1 million a year for each agency.
As the EJVT does not appear as a Cedefop priority anymore in its Middle Term Priorities
for 2009-2011 it was decided to pass the budget cut on the EJVT. On the bases of an
evaluation of the EJVT by an external consultant, as well as of the first hypothesis of the
Director of Cedefop and of Cedefop Bureau concerning the possible sources of saving, a
working group proposed some general orientations to Cedefop Governing Board
concerning the European Journal of Vocational Training up from January 2009.
– From 2009 onwards, the Journal will be published only in English with the possibility
for authors to submit articles in English, French and German.
– The production, distribution and marketing of the Journal will be externalised to a
private publisher specialised in scientific journals.
– The scientific and rigorous character of the journal will be strengthened while keeping
three categories of articles: research, information, reflection. Articles should have a
European or international character.
– A double blind review will be kept to maintain the standards of a scientific journal.
– An open pool of peer reviewers should be built, including Editorial Committee and
former Editorial Secretariat members, Cedefop colleagues and external researchers
including members of Cedefop’s and the Commission’s networks.
– The production and review process should be shortened and simplified, with a target
duration of one year from submission to publication of an article.
– Cedefop will consider increasing the number of issues to 4 per year, after the transition
phase.
6
– It is envisaged to publish one thematic issue per year, to be managed by guest editors.
– Editorship will be carried out by an internal editorial team of 3 colleagues. The team
should cover different academic disciplines and be able to screen articles received in
English, French or German.
– A full-time editorial assistant should be allocated to the Journal.
– The Editorial Committee should become an ‘Editorial and Scientific Committee’,
which ensures the scientific steering of the Journal.
– The Editorial Secretariat is abandoned and its tasks are internalised.
– The Editorial Advisory Board should be kept in its current format.
Of course these proposals must still be approved by the Enlarged Bureau of Cedefop 7-8
October 2008 and after that by the governing board of Cedefop by written procedure. But
it clearly appears that the European Journal of Vocational Training will, keep and even
strengthen his Scientific character. It is by the way planned to undertake the application
procedure to the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) of the Institute for Scientific
Information (ISI) - Thomson in October 2008 after the Enlarged Bureau meeting.
We can thus but encourage you to send your article proposals to the Secretariat of the
EJVT by e-mail at the address: catherine.wintrebert@cedefop.europa.eu in your mother
tongue until the end of the year 2008 and in English, French or German up from the first
of January 2009.