Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Anguilla 2011
PHASE 1
August 2011 (reflecting the legal and regulatory framework as at May 2011)
This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the OECD or of the governments of its member countries or those of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes.
Please cite this publication as: OECD (2011), Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Anguilla 2011: Phase 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework, Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes: Peer Reviews, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264117655-en
Series: Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes: Peer Reviews ISSN 2219-4681 (print) ISSN 2219-469X (online)
This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. Revised version, September 2011. Detail of revisions available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/8/48659863.pdf
OECD 2011
You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to rights@oecd.org Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at info@copyright.com or the Centre franais dexploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at contact@cfcopies.com.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
Table of Contents
About the Global Forum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Executive summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Information and methodology used for the peer review of Anguilla . . . . . . . . . . 9 Overview of Anguilla . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Recent developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 Compliance with the Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 A. Availability of Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.1. Ownership and identity information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 A.2. Accounting records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 A.3. Banking information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 B. Access to Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 B.1. Competent Authoritys ability to obtain and provide information . . . . . . . . 46 B.2. Notification requirements and rights and safeguards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 C. Exchanging Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.1. Exchange-of-information mechanisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.2. Exchange-of-information mechanisms with all relevant partners . . . . . . . . C.3. Confidentiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.4. Rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C.5. Timeliness of responses to requests for information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 54 57 58 60 61
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary of Determinations and Factors Underlying Recommendations. . . . 63 Annex 1: Jurisdictions Response to the Review Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 Annex 2: List of all Exchange-of-Information Mechanisms in Force. . . . . . . . 68 Annex 3: List of all Laws, Regulations and Other Relevant Material . . . . . . . 69
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
Executive summary
1. This report summarises the legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information in Anguilla. The international standard which is set out in the Global Forums Terms of Reference to Monitor and Review Progress Towards Transparency and Exchange of Information, is concerned with the availability of relevant information within a jurisdiction, the competent authoritys ability to gain access to that information, and in turn, whether that information can be effectively exchanged on a timely basis with its exchange of information partners. 2. Anguilla is a small island of about 15 000 inhabitants located between the Caribbean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean and is a self-governed overseas territory of the United Kingdom. Anguilla has a robust and modern financial services industry, including online incorporation of its more than 10 000 International Business Companies and has no direct taxation. 3. Anguilla formally committed to the international standards on exchange of information in 2002, and has undertaken to rapidly develop its exchange of information network since 2009. Since then, Anguilla has signed 17 TIEAs, six of which are currently in force. Anguilla continues to develop its treaty network. 4. Also in 2009, Anguilla enacted the International Co-operation (Tax Information Exchange Agreements) Act (ICTIEA Act), which gives the Anguillan authorities the ability to meet the obligations under its treaties. This Act also gives the Anguillan authorities broad powers to access any information from any person pursuant to an international treaty, while providing for sufficient rights and safeguards for taxpayers. 5. In respect of availability of ownership and identity information, Anguilla has clear requirements for ordinary companies, international business companies, partnerships, and foundations to maintain this information, including penalties for failure to comply. In addition, Anguilla has a strong anti-money laundering (AML) regime which applies to most entities because of the requirement to have a licensed service provider as a registered agent and to provide a registered office. The AML laws also apply to banks and requires the maintenance of records of transactions in line with the Terms of
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Reference. However, in the case of LLCs, it is not certain that ownership and identity information is available. In addition, for trusts, a service provider would only have to know the identity of the beneficiaries in the case of a higher level of risk, which may impede the availability of information on trusts. 6. Anguillas accounting requirements are not in line with the international standard. The requirements to retain records of accounts are not consistently in place for all entities and there is no requirement to retain underlying documentation, nor is there a requirement in place to retain accounting records for 5 years in line with the Terms of Reference. 7. Anguillas response to recommendations in this report as well as the application of the legal framework to the practices of its competent authority will be considered in detail in the Phase 2 Peer Review which is scheduled for the second half of 2013. In the meantime, a follow up report on the steps undertaken by Anguilla to answer the recommendations made in this report should be provided to the PRG within six months after the adoption of this report.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
INTRODUCTION 9
Introduction
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
10 INTRODUCTION
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
INTRODUCTION 11
18. While its official currency is the East Caribbean dollar (XCD) at a fixed rate of 2.7 XCD per US dollar (USD), business is also conducted in US dollars.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
12 INTRODUCTION
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
INTRODUCTION 13
2. 3.
Australia, Finland, Germany, Denmark, Norway and the UK Faroe Islands and Greenland
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
14 INTRODUCTION
Recent developments
32. Anguilla continues to work to expand its treaty network. Further, a TIEA with the Republic of Korea has been agreed, however not yet signed, pending the Republic of Koreas internal procedures. The Government of Anguilla is in the process of negotiating TIEAs with the Governments of Poland and Spain.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
A. Availability of Information
Overview
33. Effective exchange of information requires the availability of reliable information. In particular, it requires information on the identity of owners and other stakeholders as well as information on the transactions carried out by entities and other organisational structures. Such information may be kept for tax, regulatory, commercial or other reasons. If the information is not kept or it is not maintained for a reasonable period of time, a jurisdictions competent authority may not be able to obtain and provide it when requested. This section of the report assesses the adequacy of Anguillas legal and regulatory framework on availability of information. 34. In respect of ownership and identity information, Anguillas laws provide for the effective retention and maintenance of identity and ownership information for companies, partnerships and foundations, in line with the terms of reference and penalties are generally available to enforce these obligations. There is an exception in the case of trusts and LLCs. For trusts, the duty to retain ownership and identity information is derived from the AML laws, but information on beneficiaries is only required in cases of a higher level of risk. In the case of LLCs, there is no requirement to either provide ownership and identity at registration nor is there an express requirement for the LLC to maintain the information itself, although AML laws will require an LLCs registered agent to identify 20% beneficial owners. A recommendation has been made on these point and element A.1. is found to be in place, but certain aspects of the legal implementation of the element need improvement.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
38. All corporate entities are required to register with the Registrar of Companies for formation. Pursuant to section 15 of the Companies Registry Act, all documents filed with the Registrar must be maintained for at least 20 years after dissolution of the company. 39. All bodies corporate (OCs, IBCs and LLCs) are required by law to have a registered office and a registered agent in Anguilla at all times. The registered office and registered agent of an IBC, LLC and non-domestic company must be provided by a person who holds a relevant license (see Service Provider section below). Domestic or foreign OCs may have a nonlicensed registered agent (i.e. a registered agent not acting by way of business), although it is long-standing policy of the Registrar of Companies not to accept registration of such companies without a licensed registered agent.
Company ownership and identity information required to be provided to government authorities Ordinary Companies
40. Registration by an OC must be accompanied by the articles of incorporation and must set out the address and mailing address of the registered office and registered agent, the classes and any maximum number of shares the company is authorised to issue and the name, nationality and mailing address of any director. (Companies Act, Sec. 7). 41. Foreign OCs must also register with the Registrar of Companies. Registration must include a certified copy of its charter, statutes or articles of association, a list of the directors and a notice specifying the name and address of its registered agent in Anguilla. 42. All OCs must file an annual return, which includes the names of all shareholders, their address and nationality (Section 158, Companies Act and Companies Regulations, Schedule 2, Forms 5 and 9).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Company ownership and identity information required to be held by companies Ordinary companies
48. All OCs must prepare and maintain records that contain the articles and bylaws of the company, minutes of meetings and resolutions of shareholders and a register of directors (Sec. 152). An OC must also maintain a register of shareholders at its registered office. Directors and shareholders of an OC must have access to these records during normal business hours (Sec. 157). A company may appoint an agent to prepare and maintain these registers. 49. A public company whose shares are listed on a stock exchange may keep its shareholder register outside Anguilla where the stock exchange is located, but must ensure that a copy of its register as of the last day of each quarter is sent to its registered office and must keep at its registered office a copy of each of these registers and the address where the original register is kept (Sec. 152(6)). 50. A company and its agents must take reasonable precautions to prevent loss, destruction or falsification of entries and to facilitate detection and correction of inaccuracies in the records required to be prepared and maintained in respect of the company (Sec. 156).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
IBCs
51. An IBC must keep minutes of all meetings and copies of all resolutions, as well as the articles and by-laws of the company at the registered office or at such other place as the directors may determine, although the articles and bylaws must be kept at the registered office (Sec. 65). A shareholder of an IBC is entitled to copies of the articles and by-laws upon request (Sec. 66). 52. An IBC must also maintain a share register showing the name and last known address of each person who holds a registered share, the number of each class and series of shares held by each shareholder and the date a person became or ceased to be a shareholder (Sec. 24). For each share issued to bearer, the IBC must record the identifying number of the certificate, the number of each class or series of shares issued to bearer specified therein and the date of issue (See Bearer Shares section below). 53. A copy of such share register must be kept at the registered office of the company or at the office of its registered agent (Sec. 24(3)). An IBC is not required to treat a transferee of a registered share as a shareholder until the transferees name has been entered in the share register (Sec. 26). LLCs 54. There is no express requirement for an LLC to maintain a list of members. However, each member of an LLC has the right to obtain from the LLC true and full information regarding the status of the business and financial condition of the LLC (LLC Act, Sec. 25). In addition, the members may obtain a current list of the name and last known business, residence or mailing address of each member, holder of an economic interest and manager and a copy of the LLC agreement, the articles of formation and all amendments thereto (LLC Act, Sec. 25(1)). Further, Section 25(5) of the LLC Act provides that a request, including a request to obtain membership information may be enforced by a court order. This is not, however, equivalent to having an express obligation to maintain records. Although the AML laws require the registered agent of an LLC to conduct customer due diligence (CDD) on its customer, which is the LLC, as discussed in the AML section below, Anguillas laws are unclear on whether this requires that the registered agent know all the owners of the LLC or simply those with 20% ownership or more. Therefore, Anguilla should ensure its laws expressly require that LLCs maintain ownership and identity information on its members in line with the Terms of Reference.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Licensed Entities
55. In Anguilla, there are a number of specifically regulated sectors that require that the business is carried on by a license holder. Such entities are supervised by the Financial Services Commission (FSC). These include the following: banks subject to the Banking Act, with the exception of domestic commercial banks (which are regulated by the ECCB) offshore banks and trust companies governed by the Trust Companies and Offshore Banking Act (TCOBA) insurance companies, agents and brokers governed by the Insurance Act managers or administrators of a mutual fund under the Mutual Funds Act
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
In addition, an addendum is required with the details of each shareholder, beneficial shareholder or director of a company, including full name, date and place of birth, nationality, home address and additional extensive personal and financial information. 59. An offshore bank must at all times have a principal office in Anguilla and two authorised agents, who must be individuals resident in Anguilla (TCOBA, Sec. 20). An offshore bank cannot change the address of its principal office or agent without prior written approval by the Inspector of Trust Companies and Offshore Banks. 60. Trust companies must also be licensed in order to operate in Anguilla, unless the trust company is a domestic bank that currently holds an offshore banking license or an attorney-at-law so far as he is engaged in a trust business solely in the practice of law (TCOBA, Sec. 10). 61. A trust company license may be either general or restricted. The applications for both a general and restricted trust company license require the same information as for an offshore bank above and would therefore include ownership and identity information. 62. Only an OC may have a general trust company licence; and an IBC may only obtain a restricted trust company licence. For a restricted license, the applicant must list the name of the persons on whose behalf it will be a trustee, and cannot undertake a trust business on behalf of persons other than those listed or named in any amendment to the list.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Mutual Funds
67. Mutual funds were established in Anguilla in 2004 pursuant to the Mutual Funds Act. A mutual fund can be a company incorporated, a partnership formed, a unit trust organized or other similar body formed under the laws of Anguilla or any other jurisdiction. 68. There are three types of mutual funds in Anguilla: public fund, which offers shares to the general public and is not a private or professional fund private fund, made up of 99 or fewer investors where the invitation to purchase shares is made on a private basis professional fund, shares of which are available only to professional investors with an initial investment of at least USD 100 000 and whose ordinary business involves dealing in investments or who declares a net worth of USD 1 million (or its equivalent in another currency) and consents to being treated as a professional investor. 69. In addition to the requirements pertaining to the type of entity, the documents required to form a mutual fund depend on the type of business association. 70. Public funds must be registered in order to carry on business. Such application must be made to the FSC and be accompanied by a statement declaring the nature and scope of the business, including the name of any other country or jurisdiction where the applicant is carrying on or intends to carry on business; notices of the address of the applicants place of business and address for service in Anguilla; name and address of the person resident in Anguilla who is authorised to present the applicant and to accept service; address of any place of business the applicant may have outside of Anguilla; and such other documents or information as the FSC may reasonably require. 71. Both private and professional funds must similarly register, and registration includes proof satisfactory to the FSC that it is a private or professional fund within the meaning of the Act; notices of the address of the applicants place of business and its address for service in Anguilla; the name and address of a person resident in Anguilla who is authorised to represent
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
the applicant and to accept service on its behalf; and the address of any place of business that the applicant may have outside of Anguilla. 72. A professional or private fund constituted under the laws of a country other than Anguilla seeking to register in Anguilla must send a letter to the FSC setting forth the nature and scope of the business to be carried on in Anguilla; proof satisfactory to the FSC that it is a private or professional fund within the meaning of the Act and that it is lawfully constituted under the laws of another country or jurisdiction; notices of the address of the applicants place of business and its address for service in Anguilla and the address of any place of business the applicant may have outside Anguilla.
Service Providers
73. An OC, IBC, LLC or an attorney-at-law4 can engage in the company management business, pursuant to the Company Management Act (CMA) and must hold a license. Company management business is defined as the business of: incorporating or forming companies; providing the registered office for companies; acting as a registered agent for companies; preparing and filing statutory documents on behalf of companies; acting as a director, manager or officer of companies or foreign companies; or acting as a nominee shareholder of companies or foreign companies. 74. It also includes offering or agreeing to carry out any of the above named activities with the intent to carry on a business (CMA, Section 1(1)). 75. A license application includes the name of the applicant, the address in Anguilla of his/her principal office, in the case of a company, the address of the registered office and the names of all shareholders and their percentage interest in the company, the names of all of the directors of the company, among other things (CM Regulations, Schedule 1, Section 2). 76. The Governor may revoke and suspend a license at any time if it appears to him/her that the licensee is not fit, is insolvent, is carrying on the business in a manner detrimental to the public interest or to the company or that he/she has contravened any provision of the CMA or the AML Regulations (Sec. 9).
4. Attorney-at-law is defined in the Act as an attorney admitted to practise before the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court in Anguilla.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
persons engaged in the activity of dealing in goods of any description by way of business which involves accepting a total cash payment of XCD 50 000 or more (approximately USD 18 500). 81. Sections 10 and 11 of the AML/CFT Regulations and the AML/CFT Code require service providers to undertake customer due diligence (CDD) measures prior to establishing a business relationship or executing an occasional transaction.5 In the case of a legal entity, the AML/CFT Code requires identification measures of individuals who are the ultimate shareholders owning twenty percent of the shares or more. However, section 4(1) of the AML/CFT Regulations defines CDD to include identifying the identity of each beneficial owner of the customer and third party, where either the customer or third party or both are not individuals (emphasis added). Beneficial ownership is determined without regard to whether shares are held directly or indirectly, for example through a series of separate entities or arrangements. Thus, the identification requirements under the Regulations are broader than under the Code. In particular, the term beneficial owner is defined under the Regulations as including any individual that is an ultimate beneficial owner and any person that exercise ultimate control over the management of the person. It is unclear whether the twenty percent test applies equally to the test under the Regulations and how this is interpreted and applied in practice. 82. Section 10 of the AML/CFT Regulations also requires service providers to conduct ongoing monitoring of its customers and to obtain identification information where there is a change in the identification information of a customer, where there is a change in beneficial ownership of a customer or when there is a change in the third parties or the beneficial ownership of third parties. Section 5(4) of the AML/CFT Regulations provide that ongoing monitoring of a business relationship means: (a) scrutinising transactions undertaken throughout the course of the relationship, including where necessary the source of funds, to ensure that the transactions are consistent with the service providers knowledge of the customer and his business and risk profile; and (b) keeping the documents, data or information obtained for the purpose of applying customer due diligence measures up-to-date and relevant by undertaking reviews of existing records. 83. The service provider must keep a copy of the evidence of identity obtained pursuant to CDD measures, the supporting documents, data or information obtained, a record of details of transactions, all account files and all business correspondence relating to the business relationship or transaction (AML/CFT Regulations, Sec. 17(2)).
5. Occasional transaction is defined in the AML/CFT Regulations as when the transaction is carried out otherwise than as part of a business relationship and is carried out as a single transaction over a certain sum (Sec. 3).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Nominees
85. Any person engaged in the business of acting as a nominee shareholder of a company (whether domestic or foreign) is carrying out company management business (see Service Provider section above) and must be licensed under section 4(1) CMA. This results in the nominee being subject to Anguillas AML regime. Specifically, a nominee is required to know his/her customer, which in this case would require knowing who is the legal owner of the share.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
business in, a country outside Anguilla; that carries on business outside Anguilla that, if carried on in Anguilla would be a regulated business or would result in the person falling within the definition of independent legal professional; that, in respect of the business is subject to legal requirements in its home country for AML/CFT purposes that are consistent with FATF recommendations and is subject to effective supervision for compliance with those legal requirements by a foreign regulatory authority. A foreign regulated person would not be subject to Anguillas AML regime. 90. A custodian does not have to be resident in Anguilla. Currently 4 of the 27 licensed custodians are not resident in Anguilla, and they hold bearer shares for 61 companies. Where the custodian is not resident in Anguilla, it is the responsibility of the registered agent of the IBC to verify that the custodian maintains direct control facilities for the safekeeping of bearer shares which are satisfactory to the FSC (Sec. 5). The Custody of Bearer Shares Regulations do not expressly require that the custodian provide the registered agent with identity and ownership information on the bearer share; it only requires that the custodian inform the registered agent of its custodial relationship and that it has identified the beneficial owner of the bearer share. A registered agent has to be advised of any change in ownership of bearer shares in order for the transfer to be effective. In addition, the registered agent has an obligation under the AML laws to identify the owners of the company for which he/she acts. However, as discussed in the AML section above, it is not clear that this would require the registered agent to know all the ultimate beneficial owners (as specified in the AML Regulations), or only those shareholders that own more than 20% of a legal entity. Consequently, there may be some instances where the registered agent does not have a duty to know the owner of a bearer share and therefore information on the owner of bearer shares may not be available in Anguilla in all cases.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
111. However, the AML/CFT code only requires a service provider to obtain identification information on the beneficiaries in situations where a service provider determines that any business relationship or occasional transaction concerning the trust that it is required to identify presents a higher level of risk. In such cases, the service provider is required to obtain identification information on each beneficiary with a vested right and each beneficiary and each person who is an object of a power, who the service provider determines presents a higher level of risk (Sec. 4). The Anguillan authorities note that the term higher level of risk means merely risk that is higher than minimal and does not necessarily mean that the level of risk is high. This is a substantial deficiency and Anguilla should update its legislation require a trustee to obtain identification information on beneficiaries in all cases. 112. In addition, the Trusts Act requires that trustees provide, upon request, full and accurate information as to the state and amount of the trust property and the conduct of the trust administration. Anguilla advises that this requirement would require all trustees to maintain such information as may be necessary to comply with such a request, including information relating to any other trustees, settlors and beneficiaries (Sec. 27). However, it is not clear from Anguillas legislation or regulatory guidance exactly what information this would require and whether it includes all identity and ownership information on the trust, although a trustee does have a fiduciary duty as discussed at paragraph 105 above which includes a duty for a trustee to know the identity of the settlor and beneficiaries.
Foreign trusts
113. A foreign trust, meaning every trust not governed by the laws of Anguilla, is enforceable in Anguilla except to the extent that it purports to do anything contrary to the law of Anguilla or to confer any right or power or impose any obligation that is contrary to the law of Anguilla (Sec. 63). 114. There are no prohibitions on a resident acting as a trustee, administrator, protector or otherwise in a fiduciary capacity in relation to a trust formed under foreign law. The licensing requirement would apply under the TCOBA as well as the POCA and the AML/CFT Regulations and Code. 115. In sum, Anguillan law does not require the registration of trusts (although it is optional). However, Anguillan or foreign law trusts, where significant elements of the trust such as a resident professional trustee, are connected with Anguilla, would be subject to the AML/CFT regime, which requires a trustee to have ownership information on the settlor. However, such ownership information would not include information on beneficiaries, except in cases determined by the service provider to present a higher level of risk. In the limited case of a non-professional trustee, ownership and
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
122.
The declaration must set forth the following: name of the foundation, its purpose and the initial property endowment name and address of the founder(s) the full names and addresses of the foundation council members name and address of the registered agent name and address of the secretary and guardian, if any, provisions, if any, for the designation of beneficiaries names and addresses of any designated beneficiaries.
123. The foundation has an ongoing duty to keep the foundation documents up to date. If the declaration of establishment is amended or a change occurs in any of the specified facts that must be provided, the foundation must within 14 days of such change, file or deposit with the Registrar a notice, signed by the registered agent containing the details of the change. 124. A foundation must keep a copy of its declaration and by-laws and any amendment or change thereto. The secretary, or in the absence of a secretary, the registered agent, must keep a register with the identification particulars of the council members, guardian, beneficiaries, auditors, where applicable, and any person having power of attorney by the foundation (Sec. 37). Note that registered agents would also be a service provider for AML/CFT purposes and would therefore be obligated to maintain up to date ownership and identity information regarding their clients and their clients beneficial owners. Such records must be kept at the registered address of the foundation, or at such other place as the council designates and must be open to inspection by the registered agent and the council. If books are kept at a place other than the registered address, whether within or outside Anguilla, the registered agent must be notified of the location and must be furnished with such records on request. 125. Where there is an obligation on any person to have information on the identity of founders, members of the foundation council and any beneficiaries, every record must be kept for a period of not less than 6 years after the end of the period to which it relates (Sec. 6). Every record required to be kept under section 37 of the Foundations Act must be kept for a period of not less than 6 years from the end of the period to which it relates (Sec. 37(6)). Further, pursuant to section 14 of the Companies Registry Act, documents filed with the Registrar are retained for at least 20 years after dissolution. Although the AFA is not explicitly named as a Registry Act for the
in the application would not be made open to the public.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
129. The AML/CFT laws impose strict penalties for failure to comply with the requirements. Failure to carry out customer due diligence or ongoing monitoring is punishable on summary conviction by a fine of up to XCD 100 000 (AML/CFT Regulations, Sec. 10). Failure to keep the necessary records, including ownership information, is punishable on summary conviction by a fine of up to XCD 50 000. 130. For bearer shares, the Custody of Bearer Shares Regulations do not provide penalties for failure to comply, but direct that a bearer share is disabled for any period during which it is held by a person other than a custodian. However, a custodian would be subject to the AML laws and subsequent penalties, with the exception of a custodian who is a foreign regulated person. Instead, a foreign regulated person would be subject to the AML regime of his/her home country, which must be consistent with the FATF Recommendations. The penalty for a foreign regulated person for not complying is to be disqualified as custodian by the FSC. 131. Under the LLC Act there is no penalty for a failure to keep records and there is no specific penalty for failure to register. This could be an impediment to availability of information. However, because an LLC must have a registered agent who is a licensed service provider, it is difficult to imagine a situation where an LLC would not be registered. There is a penalty for a person knowingly making an untrue or misleading report or return of XCD 25 000 for a corporation and the same fine and/or 1 year imprisonment for an individual. The penalty for an LLC carrying on a prohibited business or activity is XCD 25 000 for a corporation and the same penalty and/or 6 months imprisonment for an individual. 132. The Banking Act provides that any company that carries on a banking business without registering is subject upon summary conviction to a fine of XCD 500 000, and 5 000 for each day of the violation. For a director or manager the penalty is a fine of XCD 250 000 and/or imprisonment for 3 years. Any person, including a domestic bank, who carries on an offshore banking or trust company business without a licence is liable upon summary conviction to a fine of XCD 25 000 and/or imprisonment of two years under the TCOBA. An offshore bank that fails to have a registered office and two agents is subject to a penalty of XCD 25 000. The penalty for failure to change the address of its principal office or agent without prior written approval by the Inspector of Trust Companies and Offshore Banks is a fine of XCD 10 000. 133. Under the Protect Cell Companies Act, any person who makes a statement or declaration that he/she knows or has reasonable grounds to believe is false, deceptive or misleading in a material way, who fails to comply with a condition or requirement to keep records, or who discloses ones status as a PCC or for a protected cell representative who fails to perform his/her duty is
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
140. There are not specific penalties under the Trusts Act, however, a trust can be enforced by a court and a trustee can be removed (Sec. 56). 141. A foundation that does not have a registered agent who is a regulated person commits an offense under the Foundations Act and is liable to a penalty of XCD 500 (the equivalent of the annual fee). The same penalty applies in the case of a failure to keep accounts and records (Foundation Regulations, Part 2(3), (4) and (5)). 142. The effectiveness of the enforcement provisions which are in place in Anguilla will be considered as part of the Phase 2 Peer Review.
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Determination The element is in place, but certain aspects of the legal implementation of the element need improvement. Factors underlying recommendations Ownership and identity information for LLCs is not required upon registration and an LLC is not expressly required to maintain this information. Although there are some obligations for registered agents to maintain ownership information under the AML laws, this is not necessarily sufficient to ensure availability of ownership information in all cases. Anguillan law only requires a service provider to obtain identity information on beneficiaries of a trust in cases of a higher level of risk for AML/CFT purposes. Recommendations Anguilla should ensure that ownership and identity information is available for all entities.
Anguilla should amend its legislation to require a trustee to obtain identification information on the beneficiaries of a trust in all cases.
Anguilla should ensure that ownership Ownership and identity information may not be available in all instances in and identity information on bearer shares is available in all instances. the case of a bearer share held by a foreign custodian.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
IBCs
146. An IBC must keep accounting records that are sufficient to record and explain the transactions of the company and will, at any time, enable the financial position of the company to be determined with reasonable accuracy. Such books and records must be kept at the registered office of the IBC or at such other place as the directors may by resolution determine (IBC Act, Sec. 65).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
147. An IBC must also keep a register of all relevant charges created by the company, a charge being defined as any form of security interest, whether fixed or floating, over property, wherever situated, other than an interest arising by operation of law (Sec. 76).
LLCs
148. An LLC must maintain records relating to the true and full information regarding the status of the business and financial condition of the LLC. This includes records relating to a true and full information regarding the amount of cash and a description and statement of the agreed value of any other property or services contributed by each member and that each member has agreed to contribute in the future; and such other information regarding the affairs of the LLC as is just and reasonable. This does not meet the standard in the Terms of Reference as it is not clear that such records would explain all transactions and it is unclear what records would be considered just and reasonable. The Anguillan authorities maintain that pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles, the accounting records must be such that an audit trail can be reconstructed and the transactions readily understood. However, this is not expressly stated in the law.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Trusts
151. All trustees are required by Section 27 of the Trusts Act to provide, upon request, full and accurate information as to the state and amount of the trust property and the conduct of the trust administration. This requires that all trustees maintain the information necessary to comply with such a request, including information relating to any other trustees, settlors, and beneficiaries. However, this does not meet the international standard, as it is not clear that such records would correctly explain all transactions, allow financial statements to be prepared and enable the financial position of the trust to be determined with reasonable accuracy at any time.
Foundations
152. The Foundations Act requires that foundations keep such accounts and records as its council considers necessary or desirable in order to reflect the financial position of the foundation (Sec. 37). This standard is ambiguous, as it is unclear what records this would require. The Anguillan authorities again maintain that the accounting records must be such that an audit trail can be reconstructed and the transactions readily understood, however this is not expressly stated in the law. 153. Such accounts may be kept at the registered address of the foundation or at such other place as the council may designate and must be kept open to inspection by the registered agent, the council members, and, where applicable, its secretary, guardian or auditor (Sec. 37(3)). If the books are kept at a place other than the registered address, the registered agent shall be notified of the location where books are kept and upon request must be provided with such books within a reasonable time. Where the records are kept outside of Anguilla, the foundation must ensure that it keeps at its registered office accounts and returns adequate to enable the council members to ascertain, on a quarterly basis, the financial position of the foundation with reasonable accuracy and a written record of the place or places outside Anguilla where its accounting records are kept.
Mutual Funds
154. Pursuant to the Mutual Fund Act, every mutual fund must maintain adequate accounting records and prepare financial statements in respect of each financial year in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. If the fund is a company, it must keep such records mandated by the Companies Act or if a partnership, the same as those proscribed by the Partnership Act. These records must be made available to the FSC upon request.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
AML/CFT requirements
155. Service providers under the AML/CFT Code are required to retain records relating to transactions with customers, including the name and address of the customer, the currency and amount of transaction, the customers account number, the date of the transaction, the details of the counterparty and the nature and details of the transaction. It must also keep all customer files and business correspondence relating to the relationship or occasional transaction. Such records must contain sufficient details to enable the transaction to be understood and to enable an audit trail of the movement of funds (Sec. 36). However, the AML requirements will only apply in certain cases, where a person subject to those rules is responsible for undertaking the entitys recordkeeping generally. 156. In sum, Anguillas laws do not provide for adequate records in respect of accounts in all cases. Specifically, the recordkeeping requirements for LLCs, partnerships and foundations are unclear and should be revised in line to the Terms of Reference.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
There are currently no express requirements for any relevant entities to retain accounting records which include underlying documentation. Most entities, with the exception of foundations, are not required to retain accounting records for a minimum five year period aside from the limited records required to be retained pursuant to the AML laws.
9.
However, it is noted that domestic commercial banks are not regulated by the FSC, and instead are regulated by the ECCB. This was flagged as a concern in the recent CFATF report and Anguilla advises that it is developing legislation to address this potential deficiency.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
160. Pursuant to the AML/CFT Regulations, all banks and other financial institutions are required to maintain all records pertinent to accounts, including related financial and transactional information. Specifically, Section 17 provides that the following records must be kept by all service providers when they form a business relationship or carry out an occasional transaction: a record containing details relating to each transaction carried out by the service provider in the course of any business relationship or occasional transaction; all account files; and all business correspondence relating to a business relationship or an occasional transaction. 161. The Regulations further specify that the records must include sufficient information to enable the reconstruction of individual transactions (Sec. 17(3)) and that records must be kept in a form that enables them to be made available on a timely basis when lawfully required. 162. The AML/CFT Code further provides that records relating to transactions with customers must contain the following information concerning each transaction: the name and address of the customer; if the transaction is monetary, the currency and the amount of the transaction; if the transaction involves a customers account, the number, name or other identifier for the account; the date of the transaction; the details of the counterparty, including account details; the nature of the transaction; and the details of the transaction (Sec. 35). 163. The AML/CFT Code also requires that transaction records must contain sufficient details to enable a transaction to be understood and enable an audit trail of the movements of incoming and outgoing funds or asset movements to be readily constructed. 164. A bank or financial institution (service provider) that fails to meet these record keeping requirements is guilty of an offence and is liable, on summary conviction, to a fine of XCD 50 000, in addition to any civil or administrative penalties that may be imposed.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
B. Access to Information
Overview
167. A variety of information may be needed in a tax enquiry and jurisdictions should have the authority to obtain all such information. This includes information held by banks and other financial institutions as well as information concerning the ownership of companies or the identity of interest holders in other persons or entities, such as partnerships and trusts, as well as accounting information in respect of all such entities. This section of the report examines whether Anguillas legal and regulatory framework gives the authorities access powers that cover the right types of persons and information and whether rights and safeguards would be compatible with effective exchange of information. 168. The Anguillan authorities power to access information for tax purposes are derived from the International Co-operation (Tax Information Exchange Agreements) Act of 2009 (ICTIEA Act), which allows the Anguillan authorities to carry out the terms of its TIEAs. The Act designates the Permanent Secretary of Finance of the Ministry of Finance as the Competent Authority for exchange of information purposes. It gives the Permanent Secretary broad authority to access information, including financial and accounting information in line with the Terms of Reference. 169. There is no domestic tax interest requirement in Anguillan law. The authorities can essentially access information from any person even if it is not required to be held and even if they do not need it for their own tax purposes. Because of their broad powers and sufficient penalties in place, Anguillan authorities have the power to compel information. 170. Anguillan law provides for safeguards to protect confidential information, such as information that is subject to attorney-client privilege. However, Anguillas Confidential Relationships Act (CRA) and the ICTIEA Act seem to conflict on the issue of confidentiality. This could impede access to information, therefore the report makes a recommendation that this be clarified and
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Ownership and identity information (ToR B.1.1) and accounting records (ToR B.1.2)
172. Competent authorities should have the power to obtain and provide information held by banks, other financial institutions, and any person acting in an agency or fiduciary capacity including nominees and trustees, as well as information regarding the ownership of companies, partnerships, trusts, foundations, and other relevant entities including, to the extent that it is held by the jurisdictions authorities or is within the possession or control of persons within the jurisdictions territorial jurisdiction, ownership information on all such persons in an ownership chain.10 Competent authorities should also have the power to obtain and provide accounting records for all relevant entities and arrangements.11 173. Section 5 of the ICTIEA Act provides that the Permanent Secretary may require any person in Anguilla to provide any information that the Permanent Secretary may require with respect to a request for assistance by a requesting party. A person from whom this information is requested has a statutory duty to provide such information within the time requested (Sec. 6). A person is defined under the Interpretation and General Clauses Act (s1) to include any corporation, either aggregate or sole, and any club, society, association or other body, of one or more persons. This definition is sufficiently broad to include all entities in Anguilla, including banks, and financial institutions and any person acting in an agency or fiduciary capacity, including nominees and trustees.
10. 11.
See OECD Model TIEA Article 5(4). See JAHGA Report paragraphs 6 and 22.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
174. The Permanent Secretarys powers under the ICTIEA Act also extend to accounting information. The term information is defined broadly in Section 1 to cover any fact, statement or record in any form whatever that is relevant or material to tax administration and enforcement.
Use of information gathering measures absent domestic tax interest (ToR B.1.3)
175. The ICTIEA Act is clear that its competent authority may access any information from any person (Sec. 5). The competent authority may only decline a request for information in limited circumstances, none of which include a domestic tax interest requirement. 176. Further, the exercise of the competent authoritys powers is not dependent on whether or not a person is required to have the information or if the information is required to be held; the competent authoritys powers extend to the actual holder of the information. No distinction is made as to whether the person in possession of the information is required to be in possession of it or not (see Section 5, ICTIEA Act).
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
attorney and a client but also between an attorney and another person who is not the client in connection with legal proceedings. This will be the subject of further review in Phase 2 of the Peer Review of Anguilla. 184. Anguillas domestic laws conflict on the issue of secrecy. Subject to enumerated exceptions, the Confidential Relationships Act (CRA), applies to all confidential information with respect to business of a professional nature that arises in or is brought into Anguilla and to all persons who come into possession of that information at any time thereafter, whether within or outside Anguilla. Confidential information is defined as information concerning any property, or relating to any business of a professional nature or commercial transaction that has taken place, or that any party concerned contemplates may take place, that the recipient thereof is not, otherwise than in the normal course of business or professional practice, authorised by the principal to divulge. 185. While the CRA specifically excepts information provided pursuant to the Banking Act or the FSC Act, it does not expressly exclude information provided pursuant to the ICTIEA Act (CRA, Section 2(2)). Therefore, it is possible that someone who divulges information pursuant to a request from the competent authority would violate the CRA by providing such information. 186. Further, the fact that both the Banking Act12 and the FSC Act13 contain specific exclusions to their respective confidentiality provisions for information provided pursuant to the ICTIEA Act makes this omission more troublesome. 187. Section 7 of the ICTIEA Act provides an absolute defence to any claim brought against a person in respect of any act done in good faith in compliance with a direction from the competent authority to provide information. Anguilla contends that this would clearly provide a defence against any claims arising under the common law, or any legislation imposing
12. Section 32 of the Banking Act, which applies to the domestic banking sector, prohibits the disclosure of information by persons who have acquired that information, including employees or agents of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB), except inter alia, when lawfully required to make disclosure by any court within Anguilla; or under the provisions of any law of Anguilla. Such law would include the ICTIEA Act and therefore the competent authoritys powers under the ICTIEA Act would override secrecy provisions in the Banking Act. Section 24 of the FSC Act provides that no Board member, Commission employee or other person acting under the authority of the Commission shall disclose protected information to any other person. However, this prohibition does not apply, to a disclosure required or permitted by any court of competent jurisdiction in Anguilla or required or permitted by any other Act (including the ICTIEA Act).
13.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
190. Pursuant to Section 6 of the ICTIEA Act, a person on whom notice has been served under Section 5 shall provide the information within the period specified in the notice, which shall be 28 days, from the day the notice is served. The Permanent Secretary has the authority to allow for more time at his discretion, and may extend the period of time in the notice if he believes that the circumstances warrant it. In addition, information obtained by the Permanent Secretary pursuant to a notice must be kept confidential and may not be provided to the requesting party for 20 days. The Anguillan authorities maintain that the Permanent Secretary uses these 20 days to review the information to assess whether or not the information obtained falls within any of the grounds for declining a request, with a goal of preventing or minimising incidents of judicial review and to safeguard against potential liability for improper disclosures. They also note that the 20 days will be factored in when seeking to meet the time limits under its TIEAs and would not cause undue delay. Whether the Permanent Secretarys discretion or requirement to retain information for 20 days would delay the exchange of information in practice should be monitored in the Phase 2 peer review of Anguilla. 191. The ICTIEA Act does not require that the competent authority notify the taxpayer who is the subject of a request for information. Anguilla advises that the competent authority could notify such person at his discretion. 192. Judicial review of a decision of the competent authority is available in Anguilla. A person aggrieved by a decision made by the competent authority has a right to seek review of the decision by the High Court of Anguilla under the ICTIEA Act (Sec. 12).
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Determination The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
C. Exchanging Information
Overview
193. Jurisdictions generally cannot exchange information for tax purposes unless they have a legal basis or mechanism for doing so. This section of the report examines whether Anguilla has a network of information exchange that would allow it to achieve effective exchange of information in practice. 194. Anguillas policy has been to negotiate EOI agreements based on the OECDs Model TIEA, rather than double tax conventions. Over the past 2 years, Anguilla has actively pursued a course of negotiating TIEAs, concluding 17 agreements since 2009.15 Six of these agreements are currently in force and Anguilla anticipates that the remaining agreements will soon come into force. Also, a DTC applies between Anguilla and Switzerland which is an extension of a former DTC (1954) between the United Kingdom and Switzerland. This agreement is not to the standard. Anguilla was not aware that the treaty existed and recently its Executive Council has made a request to the Government of the United Kingdom that the extension of this DTC to Anguilla be terminated with immediate effect. The DTC with Switzerland is not further considered in this section, which will focus on whether Anguillas TIEAs allows it to effectively exchange information. 195. The legal authority to exchange information in Anguilla derives from its TIEAs, which have been brought into force by the ICTIEA Act. Anguilla also automatically exchanges information with EU countries pursuant to the EU Savings Directive, which is implemented in domestic law by bilateral agreements with each EU member state pursuant to the Reporting of Savings
15. Anguilla is entrusted to sign tax information exchange agreements, double taxation agreements and ancillary agreements by the UK Government with countries which are members of the G20, OECD and EU, as well as all jurisdictions which are on the OECDs white list of jurisdictions which have substantially implemented the international standard. Entrustments to cover jurisdictions other than those mentioned above can be granted by the UK Government on an ad-hoc basis.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
16.
TIEAs with the Netherlands, Denmark, New Zealand, the UK, Germany and Australia.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Exchange of information in both civil and criminal tax matters (ToR C.1.6)
206. Information exchange may be requested both for tax administration purposes and for tax prosecution purposes. The international standard is not limited to information exchange in criminal tax matters but extends to information requested for tax administration purposes (also referred to as civil tax matters). All of the exchange of information agreements concluded by Anguilla provide for the exchange of information in both civil and criminal tax matters.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
213. Ultimately, the international standard requires that jurisdictions exchange information with all relevant partners, meaning those partners who are interested in entering into an information exchange arrangement. Agreements cannot be concluded only with counterparties without economic significance. If it appears that a jurisdiction is refusing to enter into agreements or negotiations with partners, in particular ones that have a reasonable expectation of requiring information from that jurisdiction in order to properly administer and enforce its tax laws it may indicate a lack of commitment to implement the standards.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
C.3. Confidentiality
The jurisdictions mechanisms for exchange of information should have adequate provisions to ensure the confidentiality of information received.
216. Governments would not engage in information exchange without the assurance that the information provided would only be used for the purposes permitted under the exchange mechanism and that its confidentiality would be preserved. Information exchange instruments must therefore contain confidentiality provisions that spell out specifically to whom the information can be disclosed and the purposes for which the information can be used. In addition to the protections afforded by the confidentiality provisions of information exchange instruments countries with tax systems generally impose strict confidentiality requirements on information collected for tax purposes. 217. The text of Article 26(2) of the OECD Model Tax Convention reads: Any information received under paragraph 1 by a Contracting State shall be treated as secret in the same manner as information obtained under the domestic laws of that State and shall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) concerned with the assessment or collection of, the enforcement or prosecution in respect of, the determination
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
of appeals in relation to the taxes referred to in paragraph 1, or the oversight of the above. Such persons or authorities shall use the information only for such purposes. They may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial decisions.
Information received: disclosure, use, and safeguards (ToR C.3.1) and all other information exchanged (ToR C.3.2)
218. Twelve of Anguillas 17 TIEAs contain the language in the Model TIEA regarding confidentiality. Four of Anguillas TIEAs diverge slightly from the Model language, but would still protect confidentiality of information in line with the international standard. Specifically, the Anguilla-Netherlands TIEA provides that information can only be disclosed to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) concerned with the purposes specified in Article 1 and further, cannot be used for purposes other than those stated in Article 1 without the express written consent of the requested party. 219. Four of Anguillas TIEAs, with France, Portugal, Ireland and Germany, provide that information supplied to a requesting party can never be disclosed to any other jurisdiction, even with written consent as contemplated in the Model TIEA. In addition, Anguillas TIEA with Germany further specifies that information shall be kept confidential and shall be protected in the same manner as information obtained under the domestic laws of the Contracting Parties. 220. As for Anguillas domestic laws, Section 9 of the ICTIEA Act prohibits a person who is notified or required to take any action or required to supply any information from disclosing the notification or receipt of a request or supplying the information to another person, except in accordance with the agreements or the arrangement or where the disclosure of information is a privileged conversation. The Act provides a penalty for contravention of this provision of a fine of XCD 10 000 or imprisonment for 2 years or both on summary conviction. 221. The confidentiality provisions in Anguillas agreements and its domestic law do not draw a distinction between information received in response to requests and information forming part of the requests themselves. As such, these provisions would apply equally to all requests for such information, background documents to such requests and any other document reflecting such information.
Determination and factors underlying recommendations
Determination The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
222. The international standard allows requested parties not to supply information in response to a request in certain identified situations where an issue of trade, business or other legitimate secret may arise. Among other reasons, an information request can be declined where the requested information would disclose confidential communications protected by the attorney-client privilege. Attorney-client privilege is a feature of the legal systems of many countries. 223. However, communications between a client and an attorney or other admitted legal representative are, generally, only privileged to the extent that, the attorney or other legal representative acts in his or her capacity as an attorney or other legal representative. Where attorney-client privilege is more broadly defined it does not provide valid grounds on which to decline a request for EOI. To the extent, therefore, that an attorney acts as a nominee shareholder, a trustee, a settlor, a company director or under a power of attorney to represent a company in its business affairs, information resulting from and relating to any such activity cannot be declined to be exchanged because of the attorney-client privilege rule.
18.
TIEAs with Ireland, Germany, the United Kingdom, Portugal and the Netherlands. In addition, although Article 7 of the TIEA with France is not identical to the Model it does contain the identical definition for legal privilege.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Determination
Recommendations
Jurisdictions should ensure that ownership and identity information for all relevant entities and arrangements is available to their competent authorities (ToR A.1) The element is in place, but certain aspects of the legal implementation of the element need improvement. Anguillan law only requires a service provider to obtain identity information on beneficiaries of a trust in cases of a higher level of risk for AML/CFT purposes. Ownership and identity information for LLCs is not required upon registration and an LLC is not expressly required to maintain this information. Although there are some obligations for registered agents to maintain ownership information under the AML laws, this is not necessarily sufficient to ensure availability of ownership information in all cases. Ownership and identity information may not be available in all instances in the case of a bearer share held by a foreign custodian. Anguilla should amend its legislation to require a trustee to obtain identification information on the beneficiaries of a trust in all cases. Anguilla should ensure that ownership and identity information is available for all entities.
Anguilla should ensure that ownership and identity information on bearer shares is available in all instances.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Determination
Recommendations
Jurisdictions should ensure that reliable accounting records are kept for all relevant entities and arrangements (ToR A.2) The element is not in place. There are currently no consistent requirements on LLCs, partnerships, trusts and foundations to retain reliable accounting records. Anguillas accounting record requirements for LLCs, partnerships, trusts and foundations should be clarified to ensure that reliable accounting records are required to be maintained. Anguilla should ensure that its laws require that accounting records which include underlying documentation are kept for all relevant entities and arrangements. Anguilla should ensure that its laws require that accounting records are kept for all relevant entities and arrangements for a minimum of 5 years.
There are currently no express requirements for any relevant entities to retain accounting records which include underlying documentation. Most entities, with the exception of foundations, are not required to retain accounting records for a minimum 5 year period aside from the limited records required to be retained pursuant to the AML laws. The element is in place.
Banking information should be available for all account-holders (ToR A.3) Competent authorities should have the power to obtain and provide information that is the subject of a request under an exchange of information arrangement from any person within their territorial jurisdiction who is in possession or control of such information (irrespective of any legal obligation on such person to maintain the secrecy of the information) (ToR B.1) The element is in place, but certain aspects of the legal implementation of the element need improvement. Anguillas Confidential Relationships Act does not expressly provide an exception for information provided pursuant to its ICTIEA Act or its tax treaties. Anguilla should ensure that the competent authority has the express power to access all information, including confidential information.
The rights and safeguards (e.g. notification, appeal rights) that apply to persons in the requested jurisdiction should be compatible with effective exchange of information (ToR B.2) The element is in place.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
Determination
Recommendations
Exchange of information mechanisms should allow for effective exchange of information (ToR C.1) The element is in place. The jurisdictions network of information exchange mechanisms should cover all relevant partners (ToR C.2) The element is in place. Anguilla should continue to develop its EOI network with all relevant partners.
The jurisdictions mechanisms for exchange of information should have adequate provisions to ensure the confidentiality of information received (ToR C.3) The element is in place. The exchange of information mechanisms should respect the rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties (ToR C.4) The element is in place. The jurisdiction should provide information under its network of agreements in a timely manner (ToR C.5) The assessment team is not in a position to evaluate whether this element is in place, as it involves issues of practice that are dealt with in the Phase 2 review.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
ANNEXES 67
The Government of Anguilla would like to thank the Global Forum Secretariat, particularly Ms. Amy ODonnell and Mr. Mikkel Thunnissen, as well as the Peer Review Assessment Team, Mr. Michael Nugent of Australia and Mr. Luis Antonio Gonzalez Flores of Mexico, for their work on the Anguilla Peer Review Report. Anguilla appreciates the professionalism, thoroughness and courtesy with which phase 1 of the peer review process was conducted. Anguilla thanks its peers, who took the time to review and comment on the Anguilla report. The amendments arising from those comments enhance the clarity of the Anguilla report and its consistency with the reports of other jurisdictions. The Government of Anguilla finds the Peer Review Report an extremely useful document, setting out very clearly the areas in which there are deficiencies, as well as recommendations to address these deficiencies. One of these deficiencies relates to confidentiality and the need for clarification of the issue of whether Anguillas Confidential Relations Act might apply to information required to respond to a request. The legislative amendments necessary to put the matter beyond doubt have already been drafted and Anguilla anticipates they will be finalised and considered by the legislature in the near future. Another of these deficiencies relates to accounting information and underlying records. Anguilla accepts that the requirements regarding accounting records are not explicitly embedded in our laws in a way that meets international standards. Anguilla will therefore make every effort to correct this and ensure that accounting records meet the necessary requirements. Anguilla embraces the opportunity to enhance its information exchange regime and demonstrate its commitment to upholding the standards set by the Global Forum.
19.
This Annex presents the Jurisdictions response to the review report and shall not be deemed to represent the Global Forums views.
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
68 ANNEXES
Jurisdiction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Norway Faroe Islands Greenland Netherlands Sweden Denmark New Zealand Ireland Iceland Finland United Kingdom Belgium Germany Canada Australia Portugal France Switzerland
Type of EoI Arrangement TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA TIEA DTC
Date Signed 14.12.09 14.12.09 14.12.09 22.7.09 14.12.09 2.9.09 11.12.09 22.7.09 14.12.09 14.12.09 20.7.09 24.9.10 19.3.10 28.10.10 19.3.10 28.2.11 27.12.10 1.1.61
Date Entered Into Force 10.4.11 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.4.11 N/A N/A N/A 10.4.11 17.2.11 N/A 11.4.11 N/A 17.2.11 N/A N/A 8.63
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
ANNEXES 69
Anguilla Foundations Act Anguilla Foundations Regulations Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Code Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Regulations Banking Act Company Management Act Confidential Relationships Act Co-operative Societies Act Co-operative Societies Rules Custody of Bearer Shares Regulations Financial Services Commission Act Friendly Societies Act Friendly Societies Regulations Insurance Act International Business Companies Act International Co-Operation (Tax Information Exchange Agreement) Act Limited Liability Company Act Limited Partnership Act Mutual Funds Act Partnership Act Proceeds of Crime Act
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
70 ANNEXES
Protected Cell Company Act Securities Act Trades, Businesses, Occupations and Professions Licensing Act Trusts Act Trusts Companies and Offshore Banking Act
PEER REVIEW REPORT PHASE 1: LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ANGUILLA OECD 2011
OECD PUBLISHING, 2, rue Andr-Pascal, 75775 PARIS CEDEX 16 (23 2011 35 1 P) ISBN 978-92-64-11764-8 No. 58585 2011
www.oecd.org/publishing
-:HSTCQE=VV\[Y]: