Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 2. Multipoint HSPA Description ........................................................... 2 Single Frequency Multipoint HSPA ................................................. 2 Dual Frequency Multipoint HSPA .................................................... 3 3. Advantages ...................................................................................... 4 Improvement of cell edge performance ........................................... 4 Load balancing across sectors and frequency carriers ................... 5 Leveraging RRU and distributed NodeB technology ....................... 6 4. System Design Considerations ....................................................... 7 5. Conclusion ....................................................................................... 8
2/2011
page i
1. Introduction
Rapid wireless subscriber growth coupled with the necessity to provide desired levels of user experience for broadband multimedia applications has led to the continuous evolution of HSPA technology. Some of the initially developed HSPA+ features, such as Higher Level Modulation and MIMO, focused on increasing spectral efficiency by taking advantage of favorable channel conditions when available. More recently introduced features such as Dual-Carrier HSPA (DC-HSPA) and Multicarrier HSPA (MC-HSPA) exploit the multiplexing gain achievable when transmitting bursty data over multiple frequency carriers. All these features were enabled by enhancing radio transceiver chain design, both on the network side and in the mobile device (UE).
Even with advanced radio transceivers in place, there is still scope for improving cell edge user experience. Even though many current HSPA networks are plagued with issues of capacity saturation and inadequate cell edge performance, neither the capacity nor the quality potential of the network as a whole is fully reached. Adjacent sectors and frequency carriers are often unevenly loaded; different topological layers in the network (e.g. macro, pico, femto) are sometimes unevenly loaded as well.Most UEs with poor serving cell data rates can often receive signals from other cells which are yet fully exploited in HSPA+. The next step in the evolution of HSPA must take all this into consideration. Multipoint HSPA is a new feature currently under study in 3GPP with the objective of addressing some of the aforementioned issues while leveraging existing transceiver capabilities of the network and UEs. It offers advantages such as: Improved user experience at the cell edge Efficient and dynamic load balancing across sectors in single-carrier deployments Efficient and dynamic load balancing across sectors / carriers in multicarrier deployments Leverage DC-HSPA / MC-HSPA capabilities of the network and UEs by means of incremental hardware and software upgrades
2/2011
page 1
F1 F2
Primary Secondary
DC-HSPA
SFDC-HSPA
Figure 1: DC-HSPA and SFDC-HSPA In the case where the two sectors involved in Multipoint HSPA transmission belong to the same NodeB (Intra-NodeB mode), as illustrated in Figure 2, there is only one transmission queue maintained at the NodeB and the RNC. The queue management and RLC layer operation is essentially the same as for DC-HSPA.
RNC
RLC
RLC
F1
F1
2/2011
page 2
In the case where the two sectors belong to different NodeBs (Inter-NodeB mode), as illustrated in Figure 2, there is a separate transmission queue at each NodeB. RLC layer enhancements are needed at the RNC along with enhanced flow control on the Iub interface between RNC and NodeB in order to support Multipoint HSPA operation across NodeBs. These enhancements are discussed in more detail in Section 4. In both modes, combined feedback information (CQI and HARQ-ACK/ NAK) needs to be sent on the uplink for both data streams received from the serving cells. On the uplink, the UE sends CQIs seen on all sectors using the legacy channel structure, with timing aligned to the primary serving cell.
F1 F2 Sector 1
UE2
Sector 2
Figure 3: DFDC-HSPA Dual Frequency Four-Cell HSPA (DF4C-HSPA) can be seen as a natural extension of DFDC-HSPA, suitable for networks with UEs having four receiver chains. DF4CHSPA allows use of the four receiver chains by scheduling four independent transport blocks to the UE from two different sectors on two different frequency carriers. DF4C-HSPA is illustrated in Figure 4.
Sector 1
UE2
Sector 2
Figure 4: DF4C-HSPA Like SFDC-HSPA; DFDC-HSPA and DF4C-HSPA can also be intra-NodeB or interNodeB, resulting in an impact on transmission queue management, Iub flow control and the RLC layer.
2/2011 page 3
Sector Switching
In Sector Switching mode data is transmitted to the UE on only one of the serving cells, either the primary or the secondary. The choice of cell is made every TTI based on CQI value and sector loading conditions. Sector Switching can also operate in both modes Inter-NodeB and Intra-NodeB. In case of Inter-NodeB mode, tight synchronization between the serving NodeBs will also need to be maintained.
3. Advantages
2/2011
page 4
The expected average improvement for low geometry (i.e., cell edge) users is between 30% and 50% when inter-NodeB mode is enabled and reaches 15% when only intra-NodeB mode is enabled. The greater benefits of the inter-NodeB mode stem from the significantly larger number of users in the soft handover region as compared to the ones in the softer handover region. It can be inferred that interNodeB is essential in order to exploit the full potential of Multipoint HSPA technology.
Network Topology Inter Site Distance Receiver type Traffic model Power allocation Antenna pattern HS-DPCCH Decoding
Channel Model
3GPP 57 cell wrap around 1 km LMMSE, Rx Diversity 3GPP bursty source with 1 Mb bursts Exponential burst inter-arrival times with 5 seconds mean 30% total overhead power (incl. 10% of C-PICH) 2D with 70deg 3dB beam width soft combining for intra-NB aggregation independently at both Node-Bs for inter-NB aggregation
PA3
unevenly loaded sectors to take advantage of the available resources in the lightly loaded cell and translate them into an aggregate throughput gain.
Figure 7: CDF of the Burst Rate within a cell in an Unevenly Loaded Network Figure 7 shows the impact of Multipoint HSPA on the cumulative distribution of the user burst rate within a cell. The cell in question is one of the three center cells in the 57-cell network cluster used in the simulation setup (Figure 6). The three center cells were loaded with 24 active users with a corresponding TTI utilization in the cell of
2/2011 page 5
around 80%, while the adjacent cells have eight users and consequently have significant spare capacity. The graph, infigure 7, illustrates that the majority of users in the loaded cell benefit from traffic offload created by Multipoint HSPA. Moreover, the users that benefit most are those with lower data rates, most likely to be cell edge users. For example, less than 5% of users experienced burst rates of less than 2 Mbps with Multipoint HSPA compared to 20% of users without Multipoint HSPA.
3
-10%
12
24
48
Figure 8: Load Balancing Impact of Multipoint HSPA Figure 8 shows the change in TTI utilization in the center cells and neighboring cells. For the case when the number of UEs in the core cells is 24, corresponding to 80% TTI utilization, more than 10% of TTI utilization in the neighboring cells is due to offloaded traffic from the center cells, which demonstrates the load balancing benefits of Multipoint HSPA. In addition to unevenly loaded neighboring cells on the same frequency carrier, different frequency carriers can also be unevenly loaded. Dual Frequency Multipoint HSPA provides load balancing benefits between frequency carriers similar to those described above for the single frequency case.
2/2011
page 6
Figure 9: Design considerations for inter-NodeB Multipoint HSPA This requires the RNC to split the downlink data stream into two separate MAC-ehs flows. This is called Multi-link RLC (ML-RLC). Since the packets sent by the RNC across separate flows may experience different amounts of delays, there is a possibility that the UE receives RLC packets out of sequence and therefore sends RLC acknowledgements out of sequence as well.
2/2011
page 7
Enhanced RLC implementation in the RNC is needed in order to differentiate missing acknowledgments caused by genuine packet loss from those that are due to out-ofsequence RLC packet delivery; this is referred to as Skew management. Second, enhanced flow control over the Iub interface between NodeB and RNC along with enhanced NodeB buffer management may need to be implemented in order to minimize the differential packet delay between the flows and optimize TTI utilization at each NodeB without causing NodeB under-runs. Enhanced flow control should be based on the current transmission queue status, achievable data rate for HDSPA transmission (e.g., based on UE CQI reports) and cell load conditions. These enhancements are limited to upper layer software upgrades in the NodeB and RNC. On the UE side, in addition to the requirement to receive HSPA transmissions from two cells sectors simultaneously, inter-NodeB mode creates the potential for an additional requirement on the processing time for HARQ acknowledgments. This is because downlink transmissions are not synchronized between different NodeBs and uplink HARQ acknowledgments are paired at the UE with their transmission timing aligned to the primary serving cell. This in turn reduces the processing time available for generation of uplink HARQ ACK / NACK to one of the two NodeBs. Currently allowed processing time is 7.5 ms. It could be reduced to 6 ms for the average case and 4.5 ms in the worst case scenario. An option to the above technique would be for the NodeB to absorb this potential 3 ms reduction in HARQ ACK / NAK processing time. This could potentially reduce the amount of time the NodeB has to determine if it needs to send new data or retransmit old data from the current 4.5ms to a worst case of 1.5ms. Alternatively, this burden can be shared by both, the UE and the NodeB. In all cases the timing alignment information will need to be communicated by the RNC to the UE and the NodeBs involved.
5. Conclusion
Multipoint HSPA improves the performance of cell edge users and helps balance the load disparity across neighboring cells. It leverages advanced receiver technology already available in mobile devices compatible with Release 8 and beyond to achieve this. The system impact of Multipoint HSPA on the network side is primarily limited to software upgrades affecting the upper layers (RLC and RRC).
2/2011
page 8