Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
2 E-filed: 9/29/2008
3
4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6 SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
RAMBUS INC., No. C-05-00334 RMW
9
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING HYNIX AND
10 SAMSUNG'S MOTIONS TO STRIKE
v. RAMBUS'S GDDR5 SDRAM FINAL
11 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
United States District Court
12
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR
13 MANUFACTURING AMERICA INC.,
14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
15 INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR,
16 L.P.,
17 NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
18 U.S.A.,
19 Defendants.
20
RAMBUS INC., No. C-05-02298 RMW
21
Plaintiff, [Re Docket Nos. 1011]
22
v.
23
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
24 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
25 SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR,
L.P.,
26
Defendants.
27
28 ORDER GRANTING HYNIX AND SAMSUNG'S MOTIONS TO STRIKE RAMBUS'S GDDR5 SDRAM FINAL
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW
TSF
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2307 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 2 of 4
1 Pursuant to the deadline set by the court's case management orders, Rambus served its final
2 infringement contentions on August 1, 2008. Two weeks later, Hynix and Samsung filed motions to
3 strike Rambus's infringement contentions as to GDDR5 SDRAM, their most recent generation of
4 graphics-specific SDRAMs.1 Rambus opposes the motions. The court has reviewed the papers and
5 considered the arguments of counsel.
6 The court grants Hynix and Samsung's motions to strike Rambus's infringement contentions
7 related to GDDR5 SDRAM. If Rambus wishes to pursue claims against Samsung and Hynix's
8 manufacture and sale of GDDR5 SDRAM, it may do so in a separate case.
9
10 DATED: 9/29/2008
11 RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1
Samsung also moved to strike Rambus's final infringement contention accusing
25 Samsung's memory controllers of infringing various patents. Rambus filed its election of claims for trial
on September 4, 2008 (Docket No. 2128 in C-05-00334, Docket No. 1077 in C-05-02298) in which
26 Rambus agreed not to pursue claims against memory controllers in an upcoming trial. Rambus and
Samsung agree that this moots Samsung's motion to strike for the present. If necessary, the parties may
27 revisit the issue at a later time.
28 ORDER GRANTING HYNIX AND SAMSUNG'S MOTIONS TO STRIKE RAMBUS'S GDDR5 SDRAM FINAL
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW
TSF 2
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2307 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 3 of 4
1 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to counsel in: C-05-00334 and C-05-02298.
2 Counsel for Rambus Inc., all actions Counsel for Hynix entities, C-00-20905 and C-05-00334
3 Burton Alexander Burton.Gross@mto.com Allen Ruby ruby@allenrubylaw.com
Gross
4
Carolyn Hoecker carolyn.luedtke@mto.com Belinda Martinez Vega bvega@omm.com
5 Luedtke
12
Keith Rhoderic Dhu keith.hamilton@mto.com Susan Gregory svankeulen@thelenreid.com
13 Hamilton, II VanKeulen
28 ORDER GRANTING HYNIX AND SAMSUNG'S MOTIONS TO STRIKE RAMBUS'S GDDR5 SDRAM FINAL
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
C-05-00334 RMW; C-05-02298 RMW
TSF 3
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2307 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 4 of 4
1
Counsel for Nanya entities, C-05-00334 Counsel for Samsung entities, C-05-00334 and C-05-
2
02298
3 Chester Wren-Ming Day cday@orrick.com Ana Elena Kadala anita.kadala@weil.com
11
United States District Court
12
Kelli A. Crouch kcrouch@jonesday.com
13
Counsel for intervenor, United States Department of Justice, C-00-20905
14
Eugene S. Litvinoff eugene.litvinoff@usdoj.gov
15 May Lee Heye may.heye@usdoj.gov
16 Nathanael M. Cousins nat.cousins@usdoj.gov