Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
According to its own UK website, Marie Stopes International is the UK's leading provider of sexual and reproductive healthcare services. During the three years from 2007 to 2009 inclusive, Marie Stopes clinics performed an average of 5,066 abortions per month in England alone. According to its own figures, it carried out 920,000 abortions across 43 countries in 2009. A former employee of MSI had this to say: Maria Georgiou, former abortion clinic employee, Marie Stopes in the UK Mail on Sunday (London), Abortion nurses 'are paid incentive bonuses': 9-4-2005 Quote: "Everything is geared to getting as many people in for terminations as possible." Quote: "The bonuses acted as a sales incentive, as if you were working on a perfume counter in a department store. The more people you got booked in for terminations, the better your bonus would be." Is it surprising that an organisation that kills so many unborn children has no shame in being associated with such a woman as Marie Stopes?
Leaflet Produced By
Marie Stopes idea of female reproductive rights was clearly that they had no right to reproduce unless they were of good racial and genetic stock. As is so often the case with people who hold such views, Stopes was supremely and perniciously confidant that she was able to judge exactly what the ideal human being is, and therefore who can marry, to whom, and how many children they may have. Stopes saw no problem in the idea of tyrannically imposing her standards on the world: this Utopia could be achieved in my lifetime, had I the power to issue inviolable edicts. Alas! That the age of beneficent autocracy has never been and is not here today!
Marie Stopes
she cut her own son out of her will, because he insisted on marrying Mary Eyre Wallis who was myopic and therefore wore glasses. Stopes cried out that it would be a crime against his country which increasingly needs fine and perfect people. . . Mary has an inherited physical defect and morally should never bear children . . . both his father's line and mine are free from all defect. It is awful to both my husband and me that he should contaminate his splendid inheritance and make a mock of our life's work for eugenic breeding and the race . . . it is cruel to burden children with defective sight and the handicap of goggles . . . I will not in any way take part in or condone the planning of these crimes.