Eng. Mamdouh Presentation

THE LANDMARK ABU DHABI ALHABTOOR CCC JV
SHORTENING PREDICTION
PREDICTION OF AXIAL SHORTENING
April 09
2
Introduction
This presentation is intended to
shed the light on the nature of
the Shortening criterion in concrete, the
method of prediction
and application of information.
April 09
3
TYPES OF SHORTENING
Elastic shortening (instant)
Shrinkage
- Drying shrinkage (instant)
- Autogenous shrinkage
(time dependant).
Creep (time dependant)
April 09
4
FACTORS AFFECTING SHORTENING
1 ELASTIC SHORTENING
Strength of concrete.
Age of loading.
Magnitude of loading
April 09
5
2 SHRINKAGE
Ambient humidity.
Dimensions of element.
Composition of concrete.
SHRINKAGE DOES NOT DEPEND ON LOADING
April 09
6
3 CREEP
Ambient humidity.
Dimensions of element.
Composition of concrete.
Strength of concrete.
Magnitude of sustained load.
Age of loading.
CREEP IS DEPENDANT ON SUSTAINED LOADING
April 09
7
MONITORED OBJECTS
Shortening is being predicted
and monitored for all Vertical
Structural Elements,
That is:
COLUMNS
and
COREWALL ELEMENTS
April 09
8
April 09
9
LETS LOOK AGAIN AT THAT LAST IMAGE.
Long term Shortening yet to take place AFTER PLACEMENT is the key figure
to assess impact.
April 09
10
LONG TERM SHORTENING YET TO TAKE PLACE AFTER PLACEMENT
Long term Cumulative shortening for a column at
level 30, starts well before placement date.
Long term cumulative shortening yet to take place
at that point equals:
Long term cumulative shortening at that point LESS
Interim Cumulative Shortening that has already
taken place at time of pouring the slab.
April 09
11
WE NEED TO AGREE ON THE DEFINITION OF THE TERMS
JUST MENTIONED:
Final floor Shortening: FFS
Is the final (30+ years) shortening for a VSE at a given level.
Final Cumulative Shortening FCS:
Is the final (30 + years) and cumulative shortening for all the VSEs
underneath a point at a given level.
Interim Cumulative Shortening ICS:
Is the cumulative shortening for all the VSEs underneath a Target
Point at a given time.
April 09
12
MORE DEFINITIONS
LEVEL ADJUSTMENT:
Floor slab should be constructed to a higher level than that designed
such that design level would be reached to upon completion of final
shortening.
Adjustment at a given level should be equal to the Cumulative
Shortening yet to take place for all columns underneath that level
from the date of slab placement and for 30 years to come after
loading completion.
Level Adjustment = Final (30 Y) Cumulative Shortening at the point less
the Interim Cumulative Shortening at time of placement = FCS ICS.
April 09
13
WHY DO WE NEED TO PREDICT SHORTENING ?.
To determine the level adjustment amount.
To assess the impact on interfacing structures.
To establish construction tolerance in interfacing
installations (cladding, pipe risers, vertical railing ..etc)
.
To assess the impact of column / core wall differential
shortening on the structure.
April 09
14
CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
The magnitude of long term elastic,
shrinkage and creep strains has been
calculated as per the provisions of BS EN
1992-1-1:2004.
April 09
15
PREDICTION METHODOLOGY 1 - ANALYSIS PARAMETERS
SHORTENING CALCULATIONS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF "EUROCODE 2, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
RH Relative Humidity % age
[ [[ [
H
A coefficient depending on the relative
1.5[1+(.012 RH)
18
] h
o
+ 250
3
, <= 1500
3
humidity & member size - for fcm => 35
t
0
Age of concrete at loading

c
Compressive stress applied at age t
o
h
o
Section notional size = 2 Area / Perimeter
t Age of concrete at the moment)
t-t
0
Non-adjusted duration of loading
[ [[ [
cc
(t)
Cefficient for the calculation of
exp{s[1-(28/t)
1/2
]} = e
{s[1-

(28/t)]}
compressive strength f
cm
(t) at age t
f
cm
(t) Compressive strength at age t
[ [[ [
cc
(t). f
cm
E
cm
Concrete secant modulus of elasticity 22 (fcm/10)
0.3
E
cm
(t) Tangent Modulus of Elasticity at age "t" [f
cm
(t) / f
cm
]
0.3
.Ecm
April 09
16
PREDICTION METHODOLOGY 2 - ELASTIC SHORTENING

e
( (( (t) )) )
Elastic strain at time "t"

c
/ E
cm
(t)
April 09
17
PREDICTION METHODOLOGY 3 - DRYING SHRINKAGE
[ [[ [
RH
Coefficient related to relative
humidity
1.55 [1 - (RH/RH
O
)
3
]

ds1
Coefficient depends on cement type

ds2
Coefficient depends on cement type

cd.0
Basic drying shrinkage strain
0.85[(220+110.
ds1
).
exp(-

ds2
.f
cm
/f
cmo
)].[ [[ [
RH
/10
6
[ [[ [
ds
(t,t
s
)
(t-t
s
)
(t-t
s
)+0.04

ho
3
k
h
Coefficient depending on "h
o
" Equals 0.7 for ho =>500

cd
(t) Long term drying shrinkage [ [[ [
ds
(t,t
s
).k
h
.
cd
.0

ca
(

)
2.5(f
ck
-10)10
6
[ [[ [
as
(t)
1 - exp(-2t
0.5
)

ca
(t) The autogenous shrinkage
[ [[ [
as
(t) .
ca
(

)

cs
Total shrinkage strain

cd +

ca
April 09
18
PREDICTION METHODOLOGY 4 - CREEP
E
c
Tangent Modulus of Elasticity.
1.05 E
cm

1
1 2, 3 are coefficients to
(35/f
cm
)
0.7

2
consider the influence of the
(35/f
cm
)
0.2

3
concrete strength on the creep strain.
(35/f
cm
)
0.5
[ [[ [(t
o
)
A factor allowing for age of loading effect.
1 / (0.1 + t
o
0.2
)
[ [[ [(f
cm
)
A factor to allow for the effect of concrete 16.8
strength on the notional creep coefficient

f
cm
[ [[ [(t,t
o
) A coefficient to count time effect [(t-t
0
) / ([ [[ [
H
+ t - t
0
)]
0.3

RH
A factor to allow for the effect of humidity. [1+(1-RH/100).
1
/(0.1 ho^0.333)].
2

0
Notional creep coefficient
RH .
[ [[ [(f
cm
). ([ [[ [(t
0
)
( ( ( (t,t
o
) )) ) The creep coefficient.
.
[ [[ [
c
(t,to)

cc
( (( (t,t
o
) )) )
Creep deformation (strain) at time "t" ( ( ( (t,t
o
)( )( )( )(
c
Ec) )) )
April 09
19
THE MASTER SPREADSHEET
Data base for geometric, material and loading information for each
column / corewall element, including the construction schedule,
has been entered into a Master Spreadsheet.
Cells of the Master Spreadsheet encapsulate the formulae needed to
calculate the strain in the column corresponding to following
loadings imposed by floor slabs supported by the column:
SWL : Self Weight Load.
SDL : Super-imposed Dead Load.
SLL : Super-imposed Live Load.
April 09
20
MASTER SPREAD SHEET - INSERTING CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
April 09
21
MASTER SPREAD SHEET - INSERTING COLUMN PROPERTIES
April 09
22
MASTER SPREAD SHEET PART 1
April 09
23
MASTER SPREAD SHEET PART 2
DETAIL A
April 09
24
MASTER SPREAD SHEET DETAIL A
April 09
25
MASTER SPREAD SHEET GETTING A SHORTENING VALUE ON A GIVEN DATE
April 09
26
April 09
27
LEVEL ADJUSTMENT ACHIEVED
To determine the level
adjustment amount.
April 09
28
MASTER SPREAD SHEET GETTING A COLUMN PROFILE AT A GIVEN LEVEL
PREDICTED PROFILE FOR C1- L 30 TOP
-60.00
-50.00
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
2
8
-
J
a
n
-
0
8
2
8
-
F
e
b
-
0
8
2
8
-
M
a
r
-
0
8
2
8
-
A
p
r
-
0
8
2
8
-
M
a
y
-
0
8
2
8
-
J
u
n
-
0
8
2
8
-
J
u
l
-
0
8
2
8
-
A
u
g
-
0
8
2
8
-
S
e
p
-
0
8
2
8
-
O
c
t
-
0
8
2
8
-
N
o
v
-
0
8
2
8
-
D
e
c
-
0
8
2
8
-
J
a
n
-
0
9
2
8
-
F
e
b
-
0
9
2
8
-
M
a
r
-
0
9
2
8
-
A
p
r
-
0
9
2
8
-
M
a
y
-
0
9
2
8
-
J
u
n
-
0
9
2
8
-
J
u
l
-
0
9
2
8
-
A
u
g
-
0
9
2
8
-
S
e
p
-
0
9
2
8
-
O
c
t
-
0
9
2
8
-
N
o
v
-
0
9
2
8
-
D
e
c
-
0
9
2
8
-
J
a
n
-
1
0
2
8
-
F
e
b
-
1
0
2
8
-
M
a
r
-
1
0
2
8
-
A
p
r
-
1
0
2
8
-
M
a
y
-
1
0
PREDICTED
FINAL
MEASURED
CHART NO. C3-L30-04009-01 COLUMN C3 POINT AT L 30 DATE 3-Jun-08
A
p
r
i
l

0
9
T
H
E

L
A
N
D
M
A
R
K

A
B
U

D
H
A
B
I

A
L
H
A
B
T
O
O
R

C
C
C

J
V
S
H
O
R
T
E
N
I
N
G

P
R
E
D
I
C
T
I
O
N
2
9
M
A
S
T
E
R

S
P
R
E
A
D

S
H
E
E
T

I
M
P
A
C
T

O
F

S
H
O
R
T
E
N
I
N
G

O
N

I
N
T
E
R
F
A
C
I
N
G

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S

(
T
H
E

C
A
N
O
P
Y
)
-
7
0
.
0
0
-
6
0
.
0
0
-
5
0
.
0
0
-
4
0
.
0
0
-
3
0
.
0
0
-
2
0
.
0
0
-
1
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
9-Feb-08
9-Mar-08
9-Apr-08
9-May-08
9-Jun-08
9-Jul-08
9-Aug-08
9-Sep-08
9-Oct-08
9-Nov-08
9-Dec-08
9-Jan-09
9-Feb-09
9-Mar-09
9-Apr-09
9-May-09
9-Jun-09
9-Jul-09
9-Aug-09
9-Sep-09
9-Oct-09
9-Nov-09
9-Dec-09
9-Jan-10
9-Feb-10
9-Mar-10
9-Apr-10
9-May-10
9-Jun-10
-
1
4
0
.
0
0
-
1
2
0
.
0
0
-
1
0
0
.
0
0
-
8
0
.
0
0
-
6
0
.
0
0
-
4
0
.
0
0
-
2
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
26-Apr-08
26-May-08
26-Jun-08
26-Jul-08
26-Aug-08
26-Sep-08
26-Oct-08
26-Nov-08
26-Dec-08
26-Jan-09
26-Feb-09
26-Mar-09
26-Apr-09
26-May-09
26-Jun-09
26-Jul-09
26-Aug-09
26-Sep-09
26-Oct-09
26-Nov-09
26-Dec-09
26-Jan-10
26-Feb-10
26-Mar-10
26-Apr-10
26-May-10
26-Jun-10
26-Jul-10
26-Aug-10
A
B
PROFILE AT L-7
PROFILE AT L-1
I
N
T
E
R
F
A
C
I
N
G

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

L
O
N
G

T
E
R
M

D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
A
L

C
H
A
N
G
E
. .. .
H

=

A

B

=

4
.
9

m
m
I
N
T
E
R
F
A
C
I
N
G

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

C
O
M
P
L
E
T
I
O
N
1
4

A
P
R
I
L

2
0
1
0
April 09
30
IMPACT ON INTERFACING STRUCTURES ASSESSED.
To determine the level adjustment
amount.
To assess the impact on interfacing
structures.
A
p
r
i
l

0
9
T
H
E

L
A
N
D
M
A
R
K

A
B
U

D
H
A
B
I

A
L
H
A
B
T
O
O
R

C
C
C

J
V
S
H
O
R
T
E
N
I
N
G

P
R
E
D
I
C
T
I
O
N
3
1
M
A
S
T
E
R

S
P
R
E
A
D

S
H
E
E
T

I
M
P
A
C
T

O
F

S
H
O
R
T
E
N
I
N
G

O
N

I
N
T
E
R
F
A
C
I
N
G

I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
S

(
C
U
R
T
A
I
N

W
A
L
L
)
-
3
5
0
.
0
0
-
3
0
0
.
0
0
-
2
5
0
.
0
0
-
2
0
0
.
0
0
-
1
5
0
.
0
0
-
1
0
0
.
0
0
-
5
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
4-Dec-08
4-Jan-09
4-Feb-09
4-Mar-09
4-Apr-09
4-May-09
4-Jun-09
4-Jul-09
4-Aug-09
4-Sep-09
4-Oct-09
4-Nov-09
4-Dec-09
4-Jan-10
4-Feb-10
4-Mar-10
4-Apr-10
4-May-10
4-Jun-10
4-Jul-10
4-Aug-10
4-Sep-10
4-Oct-10
4-Nov-10
4-Dec-10
4-Jan-11
4-Feb-11
4-Mar-11
4-Apr-11
A
B
PROFILE AT L-36 PROFILE AT L-35
I
N
T
E
R
F
A
C
I
N
G

S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E

L
O
N
G

T
E
R
M

D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
A
L

C
H
A
N
G
E
. .. .
H

=

A

B

=

2
.
1

m
m
I
N
T
E
R
F
A
C
I
N
G

I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N

C
O
M
P
L
E
T
I
O
N
2
0

A
P
R
I
L

2
0
1
0
-
3
5
0
.
0
0
-
3
0
0
.
0
0
-
2
5
0
.
0
0
-
2
0
0
.
0
0
-
1
5
0
.
0
0
-
1
0
0
.
0
0
-
5
0
.
0
0
0
.
0
0
24-Dec-08
24-Jan-09
24-Feb-09
24-Mar-09
24-Apr-09
24-May-09
24-Jun-09
24-Jul-09
24-Aug-09
24-Sep-09
24-Oct-09
24-Nov-09
24-Dec-09
24-Jan-10
24-Feb-10
24-Mar-10
24-Apr-10
24-May-10
24-Jun-10
24-Jul-10
24-Aug-10
24-Sep-10
24-Oct-10
24-Nov-10
24-Dec-10
24-Jan-11
24-Feb-11
24-Mar-11
24-Apr-11
A
April 09
32
CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCE IN INTERFACING INSTALLATION VERIFIED
structures.
To establish construction tolerance
in interfacing installations (cladding,
pipe risers, vertical railing ..etc) .
April 09
33
THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Information extracted from various Master Spreadsheets has
been classified sorted in 5 schedules A through E.
These schedules were listed in an Implementation Duty
Matrix along with a listing for their
functions and concerned parties.
April 09
34
April 09
35
SCHEDULE A
A summary for
30 years final
cumulative
shortening
April 09
36
SCHEDULE B
Balance Final
Cumulative
Shortening yet
to take place
after placement
of VSEs
April 09
37
SCHEDULE
C
Change in
inter-floor
height
April 09
38
SCHEDULE D
Floor level
adjustment
April 09
39
SCHEDULE E
Differential
shortening
between
corewall &
columns at
pivots.
April 09
40
COLUMN / COREWALL DIFFERENTIAL SHORTENING COMPUTED.
structures.
To establish construction tolerance in
interfacing installations (cladding, pipe
risers, vertical railing ..etc) .
To assess the impact of column /
core wall differential shortening on
the structure.
April 09
41
THIS IS THE END OF THE PRESENTATION
Thank you very much for listening..
I shall be ready for your question after
viewing a Master Spreadsheet.
M.H.

Eng. Mamdouh Presentation

Încărcat de

Informații document

Descriere originală:

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Eng. Mamdouh Presentation

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

THE LANDMARK ABU DHABI ALHABTOOR CCC JV

S-ar putea să vă placă și