Claiming for compensation from the singer: The said case is a pure breach of the contract.

In general when parties come together in agreement to the terms and conditions specifies within a contract, it is the assumption between all parties that each individual will hold up their end of the bargain. Therefore when a party is in violation for breach of contract, ultimately results the other party to file for damage due to loss or disadvantages brought on by incomplete services and production. Hence here in this case also the said hotel has the right to file for compensation. Filing for damages are methods complying parties use to recover any debt gained from irresponsible parties. Recovery of compensatory damages only aid in mending the breach of contract when a party suffers economic loss. If the breach of contract leads to consequential damages, the effected party has the right to pursue recovery. Consequential damages are indirect results of a individual breaching a contract. Canceling the contract: In this case the hotel can terminate the contract. However, a termination contract agreement may be part of an overall employment contract or it could be a stand-alone legal document. Parties entering into such a contract should include as many termination scenarios as possible and include provisions for redress should a contract be terminated. Not all eventualities can be foreseen, but the more in writing, the less likelihood nonclarified points will have to be litigated later. Legal authorities recommend that special attention be paid to the terms of a termination agreement. The details might include such things as a specified notification period, severance and limitations on working for competing interests within specified periods of time or within specified distances from where work is performed under terms of the contract. However stopping of payment by IHC to singer keshab for the month of July is possible only if it is clearly mentioned in the contract that he/she is not entitled for payment without performing certain conditions of the agreement. If the party have not fulfilled the requirements for payment--also known as "conditions precedent"the other party has the right to stop payment. However, if the same is not included that refusing of payment for the month of July by IHC to singer keshab will be considered as a violation of contract and same can be claimed legally.

Once a contract is set into place parties are held accountable for upholding their end of the bargain. Other than the acceptable defenses to a valid contract there are other instances that can relinquish a persons responsibility to a contract. This termination from duty makes the breaching aspect no longer apply. The court system will excuse contractual duties if the aspect of termination is legal under the Voluntary Act. Aspects of contractual duties are applied by the parties or according to the standards of the law. A party can be withheld from the conditions stipulated in a contract; if it is found that there was a premeditated purpose in mind prior to the contract being formed. Meaning if a person enters an agreement with an existing purpose, not made aware at the time the actual contract is finalized they can be dismissed of their contractual duties. Other ways to terminate contractual duties are through impossibility or impracticability which makes a party incapable of completing the terms of a contract. Impossibility or impracticability can prevent a party form upholding their end of a contract because of death, illness or as the result of another party. Other types of voluntary discharge from contractual duties are accord and satisfaction as well as novation. The issues of accord and satisfaction work hand in hand. Accord is identified as being an agreement made between parties to end a dispute within a current contract. If parties are within contract and their is conflict many times the conflict will be resolved by accord and satisfaction. With accord and satisfaction the parties will come to a new agreement stemming from the old contract dissolving the conditions of a old contract and making it anew. The accord is considered the new agreement while the satisfaction id the plan for carrying the new agreement out. Termination of a old contract release individuals from their contractual duties, be creating a new contract where new responsibilities are produced. When a contract is given a choice of novation, the parties in

a contract are allowed to perform substitution. In order for the conditions of a contract to be carried out, the setting between parties are allowed to be substituted with all parties agreeing to release a individual from their responsibilities since a new party will be taking their place. This will in essence create a new contract that contains a different set of participating members. Termination of contract provides a way of for participating parties to be released of their contractual duties. This approach is acceptable by the court system which includes negotiable tactics as well as other measures that will immediately be considered.

Terms of Offer and acceptance are included in a contract, with the offer being the indication of what a person is willing to put forward. The supporting party agrees to the terms of the offer which binds the agreement. The offer and acceptance can be documented in many ways via letter fax, email, newspaper or verbal communication. Courts system usually use objective test to determine the difference between parties that are bounded by terms of offer and acceptance, or if the conditions between a party are standard agreements. Typical offers include four major points being, delivery date, price, terms of payment, and a detail description of the item. The terms of offer and Acceptance also outline the conditions for terms of service. If a offer does not include any of the four elements then it is not considered justifiable by court law and is viewed as a simple advertisement. Offer and Acceptance is the most important part of a contract. One distinct fact of offer and acceptance is, that it does not always have to be communicated in writing. There can be a oral terms of offer and agreement, as well as an implied contract which can take on two forms. There are contracts that are applied in fact, where one party agrees to terms before hand although the actual service would take place at a later time. One example of this is if a person orders a product and agrees to pay on delivery, however once the product is delivered they refuse to pay and this action puts them in breech of contract. Then there are the contracts that are applied in law also known as quasi contracts which gives the courts the right to remedy situations between parties. In essence this is not considered a actual contract since the court has the right to determine who is liable even in the instance where no formal agreement was made. Offer and Acceptance agreements are essential anytime a contract is being drawn. It is the one thing that bind parties together as well as defining the conditions of service. There are a variety of contracts that exist and each legal contract contains terms of offers and acceptance.