Sunteți pe pagina 1din 23

The Brookings Institution

Metropolitan Policy Program


Audrey Singer, Immigration Fellow

Las Vegas: Global Suburb?:


Migration to and from an Emerging Immigrant Gateway

Global Immigrant Gateways Workshop


George Washington University
January 12-13, 2006

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
It is important that we have a project on
the West Coast, and where better than
Las Vegas which is a destination, and
Southern California where people can see
it and ride it. It is expensive, but we can’t
continue the growth in the western part of
the United States and still rely on just
roads and air.

--Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska), in support of a


magnetic levitation train between Anaheim
and Las Vegas
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Look, I've had guys from a little farm in
Puebla [Mexico] who were some of the
best chefs I've ever seen. Phenomenal.
Anything you taught them they could
learn, and do.

Stephen Kalt, Executive Chef,


Corsa Cucina,Wynn Las Vegas

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Why has Las Vegas grown so quickly?

Las Vegas has become more like the rest of


America just as the rest of America has become
more like Las Vegas

Neon, entertainment, gambling, sex! All bigger


part of popular culture, normative American
experience

Las Vegas has become more like the rest of


America: suburban growth, inner city decline,
traffic congestion, sprawl, …and more Spanish
speakers
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Why has Las Vegas grown so quickly?

The Last Detroit: the most unionized city in the


US and the service economy

It’s not California: recession in the early 1990s


led to mass exodus out of California

Las Vegas has a diversified economy: major


transportation, inexpensive storage space, low
operation costs

Low cost of living, new housing, endless desert


space
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Las Vegas in Context

Great Salt Lake

Salt Lake City


§¨¦
I8
0

Reno
UTAH
Carson City
L ake Tahoe
Sacramento ¦¨§
I70

Stockton NEVADA
San Francisco
San Jose Lake Powell

Fresno
North Las Vegas §¨¦
I15

Lake Mead
Las Vegas
CALIFORNIA
¦¨§ I5

Henderson Hoover Dam ARIZONA


Bakersfield

Oxnard
¦¨§
I40

§
¨¦I17
Riverside
Los Angeles Phoenix
Salto n S ea
¦¨§ I1 0

San Diego
¦¨§
I8

Tucson

§
¨¦ I19 BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Population Change in Las Vegas, 1960-2000

Total Population, Metropolitan Las Vegas, 1960-2000

1800000

1600000
1,563,282

1400000

1200000

1000000
852,737
800000

528,000
600000

400000 304,744

200000
139,126
119% 76% 62% 83%
0
Total population
1980 1990 2000
1960 1970
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: Census METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Migration In and Out of Las Vegas

Gross and net migration, Las Vegas

In-migrants Out-migrants Net in-migrants


120000

100000

80000

60000

40000

20000

0
92

94
90

96

98

02

04
00
-

-
89

91

93

95

97

99

01

03
19

19
19

19

19

19

20

20
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: IRS METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Migration In and Out of Las Vegas

Migration Flows between Las Vegas and Los Angeles

In-migrants Out-migrants Net in-migrants

18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
19 -90
19 -91
19 -92
19 -93
19 -94
19 -95
19 -96
19 -97
19 -98
19 -99
20 -00
20 -01
20 -02
20 -03
4
-0
89
90
91
92
93
94
95

97
98
99
00
01
02
03
96
19

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: IRS METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Migration In and Out of Las Vegas
Migration Flows between Las Vegas and Riverside-San Bernardino

6000 In-migrants Out-migrants Net in-migrants

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0
90

92

94

96

98

00

02

04
-

-
89

91

93

95

97

99

01

03
19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: IRS METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Migration In and Out of Las Vegas

Migration Flows between Las Vegas and Phoenix

4500 In-migrants Out-migrants Net in-migrants


4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-500
0

4
-9

-9
-9

-9

-9

-0

-0

-0
91

93
89

95

97

99

01

03
19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: IRS METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Los Angeles Metropolitan area dominates inflow

Sources of Gross In-migration to Las Vegas Metropolitan Area, Selected Years

1990 1994 2000 2004


Metropolitan Area
# % # % # % # %
Los Angeles* 9,762 14.5 15,251 19.8 12,695 14.9 15,566 16.0
Riverside-San
Bernardino 2,286 3.4 4,632 6.0 4,251 4.9 4,451 4.6
Chicago 1,519 2.3 2,246 2.9 3,140 3.7 3,201 3.3
New York 993 1.5 2,223 2.9 2,537 3.0 3,182 3.2
San Diego 1,841 2.7 2,697 3.5 2,512 2.9 3,968 4.1
Phoenix 4,213 6.3 2,190 2.8 2,387 2.8 2,281 2.3
Reno 1,415 2.1 1,310 1.7 1,218 1.4 1,288 1.3

Total In-migration 67,222 77,171 85,300 97,147

*includes Orange County

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: Internal Revenue Service METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Increase in the Foreign-Born, Las Vegas, 1980-2000

300,000

258,494
250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000
74,304

50,000
35,062
112% 248%
0
1

1980 1990 2000

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: Census METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
The nation’s primary Gateway States are shifting

From Northeast
and Southwest

To Southeast
and Mountain West

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Contemporary trends in metropolitan immigrant
settlement
HIGHEST PERCENT FOREIGN-BORN, 2000

Miami, FL 50.9
Jersey City, NJ 38.5
Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 36.2
San Jose, CA 34.1
New York, NY 33.7
San Francisco, CA 32.0
Orange County, CA 29.9
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 29.5
Laredo, TX 29.0
Salinas, CA 29.0
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Contemporary trends in metropolitan immigrant
settlement
PERCENT GREATEST GROWTH IN FOREIGN-BORN, 1990-2000
(Among Metros with >1M total population)

Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point, NC 367.2


Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 315.0
Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 270.4
Atlanta, GA 262.8
Las Vegas, NV-AZ 247.9
Nashville, TN 219.9
Denver, CO 186.6
Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 182.7
Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT 174.1
Austin-San Marcos, TX 172.2
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Country of Birth, Las Vegas 2000

Philippines 10%
El Salvador 4%
Canada 3%

Cuba 3% UK 2%

Korea 2%

Germany 2%

Mexico China 2%
47%
Vietnam 2%

Other
23%

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Where did you live 5 years ago (1995), Las Vegas
residents, 2000

Native -Born Foreign -Born

Same House 38 % 26 %

Different House, US 61 % 54 %

Abroad 1% 19%

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Percentage of foreign-born who moved from abroad
five years ago, selected metros, 2000

RESIDING IN

Los Angeles 23%


Las Vegas 26%
New York 33%
Chicago 33%
Phoenix 36%
Dallas 38%
Detroit 38%
Pittsburgh 41%
Atlanta 42%
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Among FB movers, where did you live 5 years ago?
Different house in US Abroad
Korea 78 22

China 72 28

Japan 77 23

Guatemala 77 23

Germany 93 7

Cuba 66 34

Canada 82 18

El Salvador 86 14

Philippines 80 20

Mexico 71 29
BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
0 20 40 60 80 METROPOLITAN
100 POLICY PROGRAM
120
Residential concentration outside the city limits

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Change in the population without the foreign born

Population Change in Selected Metropolitan Areas, 1990-2000

90.0
Percent Change in Total Population
80.0
Percent Change in Native-born
Population
70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0
Pittsburgh Chicago New York Los Angeles Atlanta Las Vegas Phoenix
-10.0

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
Source: Census METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM
Las Vegas, Global Suburb?

Migration ‘system’ with the Southwestern region,


including Mexico

More affordable middle-class lifestyle, like the


‘burbs used to be?

Foreign-born population will continue to grow due


to social networks

BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM

S-ar putea să vă placă și