Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
19
Epiphytie lichen flora of a pristine habitat (Nit Campus) in Southern Assam, tndia
Jayashree Rout-, tl.oyal ll.ongnrei and Pulak Das
Departr.nent
of
Ecology and Environmental Science, Assarn University, Silchar - 788 0ll, Assam. lNDlA.
An enurneratiorr of 24 eprphytic lichen species found grorving in NIT Carnpus of Assarr is provided. 'ilre trees are thickly covered rvith three species of Pl,.rirre. The graphidaceous and pyrenocarpous
genera also dominate the trees.
Assat"n
topograpltical and
clinratic diversity has endorved it ivith a rich lichen t'lora, both in luxuriance and species diversity. Despite intense effort in explol'atioll aud srtrvey ciuring the last four decades, our kr.rowledge about liclrens remaius incornplete with vast areas still rcrnaining urlexplored (Alvasthr, 1983). India as one
spread over - 200 hectares, comprise the study alea. The campus is about 9 lcnr. away from ntain township of Silchar. With a uumber of stnall hillocks and water
habitat. A nurnber of trees like Ailocarpus clnnru, Tetrenreles nudi-flortt, Ficus sp., Neoltouzeatta dulooa, Acacia'auriculifortnis, Mesttct .ferrett, Tbctona grandis,,Albizia procet)a, Antlrcceplutlus
chinensis, Artocarpus lrcteroplryllus, Tbona ciliata and Ery:tlfina sp., found growing in the area offer
i'.Jorth-Eastern India which is considered to be "Botanical Eden" (Ilalaklisluran, 198l-83; Flaridasan and llao, l985-87; Janir and l{ao, 1988; Joseph, 1982; lianjilal et a\.,1934-40; Kakati, 1986;Itao, 1974;l{ao and }:lazra, l986). This part of the country remain
ideal substratum for proliferous growth of variety of lichens. An inteusive exploration of lichens wele underlalten liorn April-Juue month during which the average temperature was 280C ancl rainfall was 1836
lnm The lichen sar.nples were procured from shrubs and trees in the campus which harbour a tlrich felt
terrrt irtcogttitc from the lichenological research perspcctive. Sporadic account of lichens frorn this
r.':gron lras been made in last ferv decades (Awasthi,
l99l).
Some studies on lichen taxa have beeu & Singh, 1986; Singh dc
and
aLrthenticated infornration on the lichens from Southem part of Assaur, Barak Valley. As a part of or.rl ongoing prograrnlne to make a systernatic in.,,estigatior-r on the lichen flola of North-East, we Irave undertaken to explore the lichen flora of NIT
L a,rrl)us 1Silclrar,l.
ofwhitish or pale green patches on the bark surfaces. The samples were seggregated and suitable herbaria were prepared. The iichen specirrrens were carefully examined morphologically, anatornically and
chernically. The colour spot tests were performed with reagents as I( (5% potassiurn hydroxide), C (aqueous solution of calciurn hyJrochlorite) and PD
-lhe present investigation on epipll)'tic [ichens iras [reen conducted in National Institute of
PHYTOI^AXON0|VIY VOL.
-5. 2O()5
,\ll tlrc laxa llrus stucliecl rvere identifred by cotnparing the descliptions avajlable in tlre floras arrcl latcst rnonograplric treatutents of various gcrcril. Nlost of the taxir wete authenicated in lichen lrer.balia at National Botarrical Research lnstitute (I-\\;C). Lucl<uorv arrd a sel ol voucher speciltleus
ir- tlcpositcil tliere.
out
lLesults irrrd lliscussiorr 1-lre study r.evealed tlre occurrertce of 24 spccics ol lichens belonging tcl l2 genera and 8 laririlics out ol93 specirneus collectecl fiorn different tr ce bar"ks flonr NIT Campus. Silchar'. All twentylirur species ale colticolous (Table l) ol'which lS irrc urLrsto-qe and 6 are fbliose fonns. The Cantpr-rs shou's a goocl glorvtli of lichens on the bark sulfaccs. l-he trecs ale thickly coveled lvith species
P_r,-rure. Ten species of the Glaplridaceaeous lichen gellera Grttpltis ancl [tltueout'ttphirrc donrinates the area- Tlie ruembers of liclren fatnily physciaceae ranked second r,vith 6 spccies. Parnreliaceae with a siugle genus llot'ttrotrenttt reflected its stray occr-rlrence. Tlre
We ale grateful to the Director', National Botanical l{esearch h.rstitute (NBl{l) [or provicling laboratory facilities to rvork. We tbank to Dr. D.li,. Upreti ancl Dr. Sanjeeva Nayaka fbr valuable suggestions rvhich have significantly improvecl tlic
presentation.
I{eferentes
Awasthi, D.D. 1933, Present position. prospects
problerns
arrd
ol
Lichenologl,
: l-
o1'lichen genus
.,
337
Balakrishnarr. N.P. l98l-81. Flora of Jowai and vicirrity Meglralaya. Vol. I and Il. Bot. Surv. lnrJia. Horvrah.
Culbersorr. C.F. 1972, Irrrproved conditiorrs and ncrv da(a
s(arrdardizcd
..1. Cltrontalo.qr. 72
il3-t25.
Haridasarr.
Nleghalaya. Vol.
Try'pethilliaceae. Lichen farnily Pyrenulaceae is represented by occulrence of two species. Most of tlre srrrootlr balk trees ar.e colonised wiLb P1'renula,
K. & Rao. R.fi. 1985-87. [iorest flora of I cQ. ll.. Bisherr Singh alrd lVlahendra I)al
Sirrgh, Debradurr. Jatnir. N.S. and Rao, R.lt. l9BlJ. The lerns of' Nagaland. Bisherr Singh arrd Maherrdta [,al Singh, Dehradun.
Joseph,
Slt
'fhe yotLng tlees haviug srnooth bark suppolt tlre good glowth of crustose foln.r licheus, Nlature
tr.ees sustain tlre
llills District.
illong.
J,
1982. Flora of Norrgpoh arrd vicinity. East Khasi Meghalaya. ['orest Departlnent. Meghalaya.
l.roth crustose and foliose lichens. The presence of 24 [ichens species in a contparativeiy sniall and lor.v
altitude area reveals a rich lichen diversity of the region. The present study sultports the liclren
ricluress of North-East lndia. Similar assesslnent was rnacle on the lichen flola frolt Nagaland by Singh
Kakati, S.l(. 1986. Orchids ol Meghalaya. Foresr Departrilent, Goverrrrnent of Nleghalaya. Shillong. I(atrjilal et ul., 1934-40. Flora of Assarn. Vols. 5.
Coverlrncnt Press. Shillong.
Rao, A.S. I974. 'Ihe vegetatiotl and phytogeography ol Assanr - 13urrna; hr Eco. Arttl Biogeogruplt.y in India (cd. M.S, lvlani). pp. 204-246. llange. Rao, R.R.
tliveLsiti,
and p;istiue |abitat of NIT can.lpus is so cleal that the preseut situation of lichen cliver"sity can be used as indicators of errosystenr continuity and r.vill also be helpfirl in iclentifying tlre areas lhat sliould be protected froln pollution. The size and shape of an area affected
of lichels
&
&
Singlr, K.l'i & Sinha, GP. 1994. Lichen flora of Nagalarrd. Bishen Singh Nlahendla Pal Sirrgh Publ. pp 498.
Walker. F.C. & P,W. Jarrres, 1980. n revised guide to rnicro chernical techniques lor the identification of liclren proclucts. Bulletirr Briti.\h Liclten,9ocierr, (Supplenrerrt) 46 : ll-29.
(and
clteaply) by ruapping indicator species of lichens. Tlie present iuvestigation providcs the baseline
hPlPllYTlC LICIIEN
FLORA
IN
Table
Sl. l-ichens
No.
SPecies
tttultte nsis (Rasarretl) Awasthl
Grorvth form
C
Family
Te losch is tace ire
(ulottluttt
rustose
se
Cru sto
Physciaceae Physciaceae
G raplt
i
j.
Alvasthi
Foliose
Crustose
C rust o se C ru sto se
1. Glvphis r/trli lrsclllrr' Stirton 5. Graphrs nrgroglauca, Leightott 6. Grupltis.rcripla (L.) Ach Gtuphts subusultintte. Nagarkar & 1 .
R ).
L(a(uior0 celtistrr. Ach
Lecanortr
riaceae
Patrv
Crrtstose Crustose
C ru stose
Lecanoraceae Lecanorirceae
Opegraphac eae Parmel iaceae Graph idaceae Graph i daceae
C rap h i.l ac eae
leivrt.
Stizenb
10.
I
c rus to se
Foliose
12.
&
Upreti) Arg'
Singh
Crustose
Crustose
C
ll. l:1. I 5.
I
Mill
rustose
Phtteogrttphina nilgrriensis.
(l rustose
C rus
Graphidaceae Graphidaceae
Pyre nu I ac eae
6. Ph'aeograpltintt rt'/tlliutto
Pt,renula arthoilithe.a (Eschrv ) Upreti Pttrenulu conctella (Stirton) Upreti
(Fee
tose
l-i. l l(
2().
21,.
C rus to se C
rustose
Pyrenulaceae
Physctaceae Physciaceae
NYI
Foliose
Fol i ose Fol i ose
Ph-sciaceae
Phvscr aceae
G raph
petricolu NYl.
Foliose
23. 24
Mill'
Arg
(lrustose
C
idaceae
rustose
Trypethilliaceae
Wt&l'nKgqir'"4
rl-r
?,,: