Mission Statement: Our mission is to serve as a leading center of Christian thought and action providing an excellent education from

a biblical perspective and global context in pivotal professions to equip Christian leaders to change the world.

COURSE SYLLABUS
SCHOOL OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES GENERAL EDUCATION GENE 100 THE MAKING OF THE CHRISTIAN MIND SPRING 2011 SEMESTER SESSION D COURSE LOCATION: ONLINE ON-CAMPUS

All students are required to read and have a thorough understanding of the syllabus. Any questions or concerns need to be addressed to the instructor.

SECTION 1 - OVERVIEW
YOUR INSTRUCTOR FOR THIS COURSE: Instructor: Dr. W. David Winner (Professor Winner) Telephone: (215) 237-1330 Fax: (215) 6282077 Please contact me before faxing to this number, so I will be expecting the fax. E-mail: willwin@regent.edu Office Hours: I am available anytime; please contact me by email or text to set up an appointment by phone. Office Location: In my basement. PERSONAL GREETING FROM THE INSTRUCTOR Hi, I am Dr. W. David Winner. I live in Lansdale, PA near Philadelphia. I was the Pastor to Students and Young Adults at Grace Baptist Church of Blue Bell. I have recent resigned from this church 13 years of ministry. I received a MDIV from Palmer Theological Seminary and my PhD in Organizational Leadership with a major in Human Resource Development from Regent University. I am married to Dena (18 years) and we have three great kids, Rebecca (13), Catherine (12) and Andrew (9). I love discussing ministry, theology and biblical worldviews. In addition, I love teaching. I am so excite to see what God will do with each one of us through this class. It is my prayer that God will use this class to expand our vision for His Kingdom, while helping us understand the basics principles of a biblical worldview. BEST TIMES AND METHODS FOR CONTACTING THE PROFESSOR Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. You can reach me by email, Pronto, text, Skype or my cell phone. You can schedule an appointment with me by emailing me and we will find a time to talk by phone. I look forward to speaking to you. INSTRUCTOR POLICY ON CELL PHONES, PAGERS, AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES My cell phone is the best way to contact me, texting is ok. COURSE DESCRIPTION (from the Catalog) Explores the development of a Christian worldview and philosophy of life. Studies some alternative worldviews from a Christian worldview perspective. Investigates the sacredness of all spheres of human life and the relevance of a Christian worldview to all spheres of human life and action through the works of some of Christianitys leading thinkers and writers. Theme Scripture: Romans 12:1-2 I appeal to you therefore, brothers and sisters, in view of Gods mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to Godthis is true worship. Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will ishis good, pleasing and perfect will. (TNIV) LEARNING OBJECTIVES Upon completion of this course, students should be able to:

1. Recognize and analyze Biblically-based Christian worldviews 2. Compare and contrast Christian worldviews with alternative worldviews 3. Propose and discuss a vital Christian philosophy pertaining to one particular aspect of life

4. Describe and interpret thinking Christianly about vocation and education in global context and
personal calling PROGRAM GOALS This course contributes to the fulfillment of the following program goals:

1. Acquire knowledge of Christian thought and leadership 2. Explore various disciplines and approaches to knowledge 3. Evaluate various disciplines, cultures, and approaches to knowledge through a Christian
theological and philosophical framework

SECTION 2 COURSE REQUIREMENTS

REQUIRED COURSE MATERIALS Students are responsible for acquiring the following books and materials for this course by the time the course begins:

Elements of a Christian Worldview (Gospel Publishing House, 1998), Michael Palmer, ed. (Hardback: ISBN-13: 978-0882434896, ISBN-10: 0882434896; Paperback: ISBN-13: 978-0882438740). Retail Hbk. $39.95; Pbk. $35.99.

Hidden Worldviews: Eight Cultural Stories That Shape Our Lives (Intervarsity Press, 2009), Steve Wilkens and Mark L. Sanford (ISBN-13: 9780830838547; ISBN-10: 0830838546). Retail $22.00.

Engaging God's World: A Christian Vision of Faith, Learning, and Living (Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002), Cornelius Plantinga (ISBN-13: 9780802839817; ISBN-10: 0802839819). Retail $16.00.

The School of Undergraduate Studies has partnered with the Regent Bookstore to have textbooks available for purchase for all students, including distance students. Items may be ordered using the secured online catalog found at www.regentbookstore.net. Textbook information is also available on the Bb Course Site.

Additional materials (e.g., PowerPoint files, quizzes, media, and the like) may be found on Blackboard. Students are responsible for the information and materials distributed through Blackboard and, for oncampus students, in class. RECOMMENDED COURSE MATERIALS Discipleship of the Mind: Learning to Love God in the Ways We Think (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1990), James W. Sire (ISBN-13: 978- 0877849858; ISBN-10: 0877849854). Retail $15.00. Simply Christian: Why Christianity Makes Sense (New York: HarperOne), N.T. Wright (ISBN-13: 9780061920622; ISBN-10: 0061920622). Retail $24.99. The Transforming Vision: Shaping a Christian World View (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1984), J. Richard Middleton and Brian Walsh (ISBN-13: 978-0877849735; ISBN-10: 0877849730). Retail $16.00. The Universe Next Door: A Basic Worldview Catalog Sire, 5th ed. (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2009), James W. Sire (ISBN-13: 978-0830838509; ISBN-10: 0830838503). Retail $22.00. GENERAL COURSE REQUIREMENTS In order to succeed in this course, you will need to fully understand the following:

1. Attendance and Participation: Your attendance and participation are important means for the
instructor to assess your skills, quality of thought, and growth as a student. The attendance policy and procedures are described below. When applicable, requirements for your participation in Blackboard discussions important both for your learning and for your instructors evaluation of your progress in the courseare described below (see Requirements regarding Blackboard Discussions). Assignments: Pay close and timely attention to reading assignments and other assigned work posted in the syllabus and Blackboard. You are responsible for preparing assigned readings carefully by the date listed on the schedule below and to complete tests, projects, and other assignments by the date listed. Out of fairness to all, late assignments are penalized as described below under Late Assignments. Policies and Procedures: Carefully follow course policies and procedures regarding writing, academic honesty, submission of assignments, formatting, and other matters, as specified below or through Blackboard. Since following directions is a crucial skill for university graduatesand since the smooth operation of our course depends on all of us meeting each others expectations adherence to policies can positively or adversely affect a students grade. Writing: All papers and essays at Regent University must follow the writing style format required by the degree specialty for which they are being written. The writing style to be used in this course is Turabian. Students may use APA or MLA with the permission of the professor. Course Completion/Incompletes: All courses require extensive engagement (with other students, the instructor, and with the course materials) as well as timely completion of assignments. Many assignments are due weekly. Thus, keeping up with the schedule is essential to your success. Some work is difficult or even impossible to make up (such as discussion with others), so you must plan your schedule carefully. Be sure you can complete this course in the scheduled period. Grades of Incomplete will be granted only for true emergency situations, not for poor planning. The policy for grades of Incomplete can be found in the School of Undergraduate Studies Catalog, found online. Blackboard: Students are expected to check the Announcements section of Blackboard each week beginning one week before the start of the course. Students must keep their e-mail address current in Blackboard; they are expected to check their Regent e-mail daily to ensure timely receipt of messages from the professor. Internet and Software: You must have continuous access to a working and dependable Internet provider as well as reliable e-mail software that can send and receive attachments. You must also have access to Microsoft Word 2000 or later for writing assignments.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

BLACKBOARD INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS Blackboard has four primary purposes in our courses: (1) to provide a means for students to receive timely information about the course in general, assignments, grades, and announcements from the instructor; (2) to promote thoughtful interaction between the instructor and students and among students themselves as they work through course materials; (3) to provide a means for students to complete quizzes and other forms of evaluation; and (4) to enhance the learning process by providing a variety of materials. For courses with online discussions, they will be posted in Blackboard. See below for the parameters for a students postings. The purpose of these parameters is to promote writing that is both thorough and concise. The instructor will post questions and activities weekly. Discussion questions will be posted in advance. Since not everyone will see things identically, students are to review one anothers postings in order to further their insight and learning. This is an important benefit of dialogue. If you want to share short posts of encouragement and support, use the discussion board tool for this. Note that the expectations for quality work in the Blackboard group discussions differ from the minimal requirements for attendance. Please check the Start Here link in Blackboard for University Library information and Academic Support information, Blackboard Tutorials and Resources, Academic Honor Code, Writing Styles, Discipline Policies, and Disability Services. If you have technical problems with Blackboard and/or are not able to log in, please contact the Help Desk/IT department. You can e-mail the Help Desk at: helpdesk@regent.edu or call at (757) 352-4076.

SECTION 3 POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

COURSE PROCEDURES Submission of Assignments All assignments (unless otherwise instructed) for this course should be submitted via the Assignment Link. Papers should be in MS Word format (.doc). When saving your document, the file name should include your name and assignment, in that order for example, Lynn Smith, Learning Styles (LSI) and DISC Inventory Essay. When submitting your document via the assignment tool, attach the file and enter any comments for your instructor in the comments box. Directions how to use the assignment manager can be found under Media Player Downloads and Tutorials in the Start Here tab. Every assignment must have your name on it, and, if it is more than one page, each page must be numbered. To do that, you will need to know how to use the Header and Footer option under the View button in Microsoft Word. Late Assignments Late work will be accepted without penalty only if prior arrangements have been made with the instructor due to circumstances beyond the students control. In the event of a true emergency, the instructor should be contacted as soon as is reasonable so that arrangements can be made to hand in late work. All such arrangements are subject to the approval of the instructor on a case by case basis. Aside from those circumstances listed above, initial discussion posts made after Thursday at midnight will deduct 10 percent for each day they are late. Late responses to the posts of other students (responses made after Sunday at midnight) will not be counted toward the discussion post grade for that week and points will be deducted in the discussion post grade. Quizzes will deduct 10 percent for each day they are late. The final paper will likewise deduct 10 percent for each day it is late with 12:01 a.m. being considered the beginning of a new day.

Emailing Your Instructor The subject line of all e-mail messages related to this course should include the course number (e.g., GENE 100), the location of the course (e.g., online_section # or on-campus_section #) and the name of the student (For example, SUBJECT: GENE 100 online_02, Lynn Smith). Following these directions enables the professor to identify quickly the student and course, facilitating a timely response. Students should always include their first and last name at the end of all e-mail messages. Because instructors often need to reach students, all students are required to keep their mailing address, e-mail address, and telephone numbers up to date in GENISYS. ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION POLICY (School of Undergraduate Studies) Regent University recognizes the importance of class attendance and participation for students learning. While attendance alone does not guarantee learning, engagement with the class through regular attendance and participation is essential to learning, both to the individual student and to the class itself as all benefit by others contributions. At Regent University, class attendance, understood as the act of being present, is considered to be separate from participating in the class, understood as active engagement through discussion and other forms of interaction. Both are valuable to student learning. Like other institutions of higher education, Regent University is required to maintain accurate attendance records by the U.S. Department of Education. Attendance is tracked weekly. For any week (7 days from Monday to Sunday) in which a student does not attend class time or, for online classes, log into the course in Blackboard, the student will be marked absent in the Blackboard grade book. The standard by which a final date of attendance in the class is measured will be the last date on which the online student logs into the course in Blackboard or the on campus attends the on-campus class for a course, whichever is more recent. Students should be aware that this date could affect their financial aid and financial obligations. Normally, expectations for participationsuch as those for quality work in the group discussions (including those in Blackboard)--differ from the minimal requirements for attendance. Thus, at the instructor's discretion, a student who is present or absent might lose participation points. Instructors determine whether students may gain back lost participation points (for example, through additional work). Students should be aware that instructors follow their posted policy for receiving late work from students. Work turned in late (papers, discussion board posts, etc.) could result in the loss of participation points or other components of the final course grade. Instructors are responsible to maintain accurate records regarding attendance and to follow course policies for grading student work, including students participation. Students are responsible to attend and participate in class and to follow campus policies. UNIVERSITY WITHDRAWAL Students who have not attended or logged into a class, will, at the end of the second week of the session/semesterin accordance with university practicebe assumed to have unofficially dropped and will be administratively dropped from that class. UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC HONOR CODE Students are on their honor to complete assignments with honesty and integrity. Academic dishonesty involves intentionally or unintentionally stealing the intellectual property of others. Students are expected to be familiar with the universitys policy on academic integrity found in both the University Student Handbook and School of Undergraduate Studies Catalog (http://www.regent.edu/general/catalog/) and to follow it. As an academic and Christian community, Regent University takes seriously the call for integrity and penalizes breaches of of academic integrity.

SECTION 4 SCHEDULE AND EVALUATION

COURSE SCHEDULE The schedule below includes the due dates for all assignments in this course. It is recommended that you place this Course Schedule in a convenient place and refer to it each week of the course. You need to follow it closely, as late assignments are subject to a grade reduction. In an 8-week section, students are expected to spend fourteen to seventeen hours of classwork per week (OR for on-campus 16-week sections, seven to eight and a half), to include online work, homework and study time (and, for on-campus students, in-class time) for a three-credit hour class. All courses use group discussion questions on Blackboard. Postings cannot be made up once the week is over, as the rest of the class will have moved on to the next topic. Assigned readings in the textbook(s) are to be completed each week along with any additional articles, audio clips, and PowerPoint presentations as found in the Course Content and Activities section of Blackboard. Assignments for each week should be completed by Saturday midnight (EST). Week One: Unit 1. Introduction: The Making of the Christian Mind (March 7) Syllabus: Before doing anything else be sure to download and carefully read the syllabus. You are responsible for all information in the syllabus. Read: Plantinga, Engaging Gods World, ix-16 James W. Sire, Ch. 9, pp. 178-204 (Jesus the Reasoner) in Habits of the Mind (locate this reading material under Course Content and Activities, Unit 1, Read/View on the Bb Course Site) The Bible: Acts 2:14-41; Acts 17; I Cor. 15 Palmer, Elements of a Christian Worldview, Ch. 3, biographical excerpts of Justin Martyr, Athanasius of Alexandria, Augustine, Benedict, Thomas Aquinas, Catherine of Sienna, Martin Luther, John Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, John Wesley, Karl Barth, Carl F.H. Henry Mark A. Noll, Ch. 9, pp. 241-53 (Can the Scandal be Scandalized?) in The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind (locate this reading material under Course Content and Activities, Unit 1, Read/View on the Bb Course Site) View: PowerPoint/s Community: Link to Community (Discussion Board) and introduce yourself to your classmates by Wednesday. Share with us something of your background, interests or goals, and perhaps spiritual journey. Completion of this Introduction counts toward your discussion grade score for Unit 1. Responding to other students Introduction postings is optional. (Creating a personal Homepage is recommended as well; see under Course Tools for instructions.) Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 1. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday. (See the requirements for Blackboard Discussion under Method of Evaluation for more instructions.) Quiz: Quiz #1 due by Saturday midnight. (Link to the Quiz under Course Content and Activities, Unit 1.)

Week Two:

Unit 2. What is a Worldview? A Christian Worldview? (March 14) Read: Palmer, 20-59 (Worldview focused [WV]); 59-76 (Christian Worldview focused [CWV]) Plantinga, 17-100 (CWV) Wilkens & Sanford, Hidden Worldviews, Ch. 1, pp. 11-26 (WV); 183-205 (CWV) James W. Sire, Ch. 1, pp. 15-24 (A World of Difference: Introduction) in The Universe Next Door, 5th ed. (WV). (Locate this reading material under Course Content and Activities, Unit 2, Read/View.) Barna Reports (see links under Course Content and Activities, Unit 2, Read/View) (1 WV, 3 CWV) View: PowerPoint/s Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 2. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday. Quiz: Quiz #2 due by Saturday midnight.

Week Three: Unit 3. Worldview as Cultural StoriesHidden Worldviews (March 21) Read: Wilkens & Sanford, 27-182 View: PowerPoint/s Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 3. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday. Quiz: Quiz #3 due by Saturday midnight. Week Four: Unit 4. Worldview as Religious MegastorySome Major World Religions Compared/Contrasted (March 28) Read: Palmer, 20-27 (review); 111-13 Sire, 47-165, 244-77 in The Universe Next Door, 5th ed. (optional, recommended reading; check the library for possible copies on reserve) View: PowerPoint/s Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 4. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday. Quiz: Quiz #4 due by Saturday midnight. Unit 5. Thinking ChristianlyInterrelating Faith, Learning and Life (April 4) Read: Wilkens/Sanford, 206-18 Palmer, 79-142 Palmer, any one chapter from Chs. 4-12 (Also, it is recommended that you read ahead [2 or more additional chapters] for Unit 6 in order to balance your weekly reading load.)

Week Five:

View: PowerPoint/s Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 5. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday. Quiz: Quiz #5 due by Saturday midnight. Course Project: PowerPoint Project is due by Friday midnight. Week Six: Unit 6. Christian Approaches to Issues and Life-Situations (April 11) Read: Palmer, Chs. 4, 5, pp. 148-216; and Chs. 7-12, pp. 242-444 (minus the selected chapter/s you read previously for Unit 5) View: PowerPoint/s Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 6. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday. Quiz: Quiz #6 due by Saturday midnight.

Week Seven: Unit 7. Vocation in the Kingdom of God (April 18) Read: Plantinga, 101-21 Palmer, Ch. 6, pp. 220-39 Quentin Schultze, Ch. 1, pp. 11-21 (Listening to God) in Here I Am (locate this reading material under Course Content and Activities, Unit 7, Read/View) Sherman, A Biblical Model of Work (locate this reading material under Course Content and Activities, Unit 7, Read/View) View: PowerPoint/s Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 7. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday. Quiz: Quiz #7 due by Saturday midnight. Course Paper: Research Paper is due by Friday midnight. Week Eight: Unit 8. Education in the Kingdom of God (April 25) Read: Plantinga, 121-33 Arthur F. Holmes, Ch. 9, pp. 99-104 (The Marks of an Educated Person) in The Idea of a Christian College (locate this reading material under Course Content and Activities, Unit 8, Read/View) View: PowerPoint/s Group Discussion Board: Link to your Group and answer the Discussion Question for Unit 8. Your initial post is due by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Responses are due by 11:59 pm on Saturday.

Quiz: Quiz #8 due by Saturday midnight. Course Exam: Comprehensive Exam is due by Saturday midnight. (Link to Exam under Course Content and Activities, Unit 8.) METHOD OF EVALUATION The final grade for the course will reflect mastery of course content and quality of thought as expressed in: 1. Group Discussion Board Postings: 16% of your final grade A. The professor will post a Group Discussion Question each of the eight weeks of the course. Questions are posted under the GROUPS section under the DIALOGUE menu item in Blackboard. Group Discussion settings are both free zones and safe zones, where scholarly inquiry is both welcomed and encouraged (and rewarded!).

B. The parameter for student postings is as follows: 200-300 word original (i.e., initial) Discussion
Posting; 100-200 word response posts to 2 or more classmates original post. (The purpose of this parameter is to promote both meaningful and concise writing.) This means there will be a total of at least three posts due from each student each week.

C. You must demonstrate critical thinking skill and comprehension of the material in your
posts. It is good to cite appropriate examples and principles from textbooks and from Scripture, when appropriate. More words are not necessarily better; but on the other hand, too few words often are not enough to communicate your thoughts clearly and accurately. The ideal is to think through the question and the material, ask questions of it, and articulate in precise, edited writing your response to the guiding discussion questionusing the least number of words necessary. Strengthen your arguments (and improve your grade scores!) by citing appropriate readings and outside sources. This is scholarship in action!

D. Merely skimming or passively reading through assigned materials is unproductive and

unacceptable; commit to highlight, outline, take notes, reflect on, and/or use your preferred method to actively and effectively engage the materials. Your posts must demonstrate clearly that you have read, processed, and analyzed the readings in addition to having effectively answered the Discussion Question.

E. Response posts must address classmates by name and specific topic; moreover, responses
should carry the discourse further by contributing more data to the discussion (e.g., providing additional examples or evidence), presenting alternative perspectives, or (graciously) asking questions of assumptions or evidence of the post, while also including appropriate sources.

F. It should be obvious that not everyone will see things identically; thus the need for students to
review one anothers postings in order to gain further perspective and insightan important benefit of dialogue. Students are expected to engage with one anothers posts with both reflective analysis and respectful terminology, observing charity in all things. Showing consideration for the members of the class is required and is non-negotiable. Any posting deemed by the professor as disrespectful or otherwise objectionable may be removed without consultation, and the points associated with the posting withheld.

G. Please note that grammar and spelling are considered important as well. Therefore, compose
your posts using a word processor, pasting your edited and spell-checked text into Blackboard. Also, please do not use e-mail abbreviations (e.g. BTW). Once the week has ended, you may not contribute to the forum for a grade. The discussion has moved on.

10

H. Grading for the Discussion Board Postings will be based on the following criteria:
Total number of posts (three per Discussion Question; one initial post and two responses) Word count for each post (see above) Timeliness (original post must be completed by Thursday midnight; response posts must be completed by Saturday midnight) Integration of course materials (e.g., Readings, PowerPoints) and if applicable, Scripture (or scriptural principles) into the discourse. (Also, for on-campus sections, lectures and discussions.) Integration and quality of additional outside sources into the discourse. Sources other than your textbooks should be scholarly books or articles. E-books or full-text articles secured through the Regent University Library databases are ideal (e.g. the ATLA Religion Database, which contains numerous relevant journals and pertinent scholarly articles; see http://www.regent.edu/lib/). Popular Internet sources (e.g., Wikipedia, Google books and previews) are not allowed and English dictionaries, concordances, and study Bibles are not considered outside sources.

Presence of appropriately referenced and cited sources!

Last, but definitely not least: quality and substance of your initial and response posts. Meaningful thinking and writing needs to transpire. Measuring your strength in this area will be chiefly by how skillfully you interact with questions, readings, and classmates posts. Posts receiving the highest grade scores will reflect quality thinking and practical reasoning, moving beyond merely devotional affirmations.

I. Grade points are weighted approximately as follows: initial post, 60%; responses to
classmates posts, 40%. Note: On the General Discussion Board, a Forum will be open for questions or comments about the readings or the course. This forum will run the entire course time, but will not be graded. It is simply another venue for questions and discussion on issues not covered in the weekly questions. You are encouraged to ask questions and dialogue about the readings or the class, or about relevant topics or concerns. You are also encouraged to answer the questions of other students with your own discoveries. 2. Unit Quizzes (8): 16% of your final grade A. Your grasp of the reading assignments and other course materials and learning will be assessed through a weekly, timed, online, open-book quiz, beginning the first week of class. Quizzes consist mainly of multiple choice, multiple answer, matching, and true/false questions; there are 10 questions per quiz. Quizzes are timed (30 minutes); if not completed within the time allotted, quizzes are penalized 10 percent for each minute exceeding the time allotted.

B. Each quiz is to be completed by Saturday midnight of the week that it is required. Quizzes taken
late will be penalized according to the Late Assignments policy above (unless you have the express permission of the professor). Quizzes may be accessed under Course Content and Activities under the appropriate Unit sub-section.

C. Here are some important things to remember when taking tests in Blackboard. You will have one
opportunity to take each quiz. Bb will NOT permit retaking any assessment. Most Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have an automatic time-out feature, which will disconnect after a pre-set amount of time in which the computer receives no input from the user. You cannot pause or

11

reset your exam. Once initialized, you must complete it. Do not attempt to open other windows while taking the exam as this will lock you out of the quiz window. If a "crash" does occur, contact the professor (or if applicable, adjunct or teaching assistant) and you will receive instructions on how to complete the quiz. 3. PowerPoint Project: 15% of your final grade A. Students create a PowerPoint Project that identifies key concepts of a biblically-based Christian worldview as compared and contrasted with an alternative worldview. Projects must include all of the elements noted below. B. Identify 4 key concepts that define a biblically-based Christian worldview, answering the four main questions below. (Questions in parenthesis include other ways of asking the main [bolded] question and any may be substituted for, or included in addition to, the main question.)

1.

Who am I? (What is my purpose in the world? What does it mean to be human? What happens when I die?) 2. Where am I? (What is the nature of the world around me? What is real? What is the meaning of history?) 3. Whats the problem? (Why is it that I cannot attain happiness/fulfillment? What is the nature of evil? How do I know right from wrong?) 4. Whats the remedy? (How can I be happy/fulfilled? How can evil be overcome? Do I have a future?) Utilize and properly cite 2 or more theological sources/scholars.

C. Identify an alternative worldview; compare/contrast it with a Christian worldview, using the 4 key concepts/questions above

Utilize and properly cite 2 or more additional sources/scholars.

D. Total slide count of 20 ( 2) (including title and references slides). Use the appropriate style
manual formatting throughout (Turabian, MLA, or APA) either in the slides or in the Notes section. All sources (for ideas as well as quotes) must be cited appropriately to avoid plagiarism and potentially serious academic consequences

E. A total of 4 sources (minimum) beyond course textbooks is requisite. Required course

books may and should be used, but they do not count toward this minimum. Internet sources other than complete scholarly books and articlesare not allowed in your research paper, including Google Books, Wikipedia, and previews. Again, sources other than your textbooks must be scholarly/academic (rather than popular). E-books and full-text articles (which can be viewed on your computer) from the Regent University Library databases (http://www.regent.edu/lib/) are allowed and welcomed as sources. English dictionaries, concordances, and study Bibles do not qualify as acceptable sources to meet the minimum requirements. Regardless of the form/media, books, essay collections, and journal articles are preferred.

F. Students will submit the PowerPoint Project by the fifth week of the course (Date). G. The Grading Rubric below is utilized for assessing PowerPoint Projects.
Activity
Research & Note-taking on Storyboard (10 points possible)

Exemplary
Storyboard indicates accurate research & planning from 4+ varied information sources on 20 ( 2) slides. 9-10 points

Good
Storyboard indicates research and planning from 4 varied information sources on 20 ( 2) slides. 7-8 points

Satisfactory
Storyboard is filled out with important points from adequate sources on 20 ( 2) slides. 6 points

Fair
2 or fewer (very similar) information sources used as key sources. Storyboard is incomplete and less than 18 slides in presentation.

Poor
Storyboard is incomplete and inadequate. 0-4 points

12

5 points

Introduction (10 points possible)

Gives overall topic and draws in the audience. 9-10 points A biblically-based WV presented with all 4 key questions addressed using robust and accurate information/references. An alternative WV presented with all 4 key questions addressed and supported using robust & accurate information/references. 2 or more external scholarly sources utilized for each WV presented. Clear and concise biblical and textbook referencing used to support both WVs 36-40 points

Introduction relates to the topic and is clear. 7-8 points A biblically-based WV presented with all 4 key questions addressed using information/references that are appropriate. An alternative WV presented with 4 key questions addressed and supported using appropriate information/references. 2 or more external scholarly sources utilized for one but not both WVs. Biblical and textbook referencing used but with some proof-texting applied. 32-35 points

Introduction indicates some relationship to the topic but the connection is vague. 6 points A biblically-based WV presented with less than 4 key questions addressed using information/references that are adequate, missing key points of information. An alternative WV presented with less than 4 key questions addressed using information/references that are adequate, missing key points of info. 1-2 external sources utilized for one but not both WVs and/or the sources lack scholarly content. Biblical and textbook referencing used but with proof-texting used extensively. 28-31 points Most fonts easy to read, but occasionally font style, italics, long paragraphs, color or busy backgrounds detract from readability and appeal to audience. 6 points Visually depict topic and assist the audiences understanding of the ideas. Images are proper size & resolution. Images/text do not cross over. 6 points Several errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar repeatedly occur with editing and revision required. 6 points 2-3 resources are listed; only slight difference between types of resources. Good use of Turabian, APA, or MLA. 6 points

Introduction indicates little relationship to the topic and the connection is vague. 5 points A biblically-based WV presented with 3 or less than key questions addressed using information/references that are inadequate, missing key points of information. An alternative WV presented with 3 or less key questions addressed using inadequate information/references, missing key points of info. 0-1 external sources utilized for only one WV and/or the sources lack scholarly content. Biblical and textbook referencing minimally used and is taken out of context, is confusing, or distracting from presentation content. 24-27 points Busy background, lack of use of bullets/indents, poor color contrasting, more than 2 font styles used. Less than appealing to audience. 5 points Graphics and text appear to be somewhat unrelated to content. Animations cross over each other. Moderately distracting, busy, and detract from presentation. 5 points Numerous errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar repeatedly occur with editing and revision required. 5 points 2-3 resources are listed; only slight difference between types of resources. Fair to poor use of Turabian, APA, or MLA. 5 points

Introduction does not provide a brief overview to the subject. 0-4 points 24-0 points A WV presented lacking answers to the 4 key questions with information/references that are inadequate or superficial at best. No alternative WV presented (or presented with gaping holes in information/references that fail to address key points of info). External sources are non-existent and/or are from public media sources only. Biblical and textbook referencing nonexistent. 0-23 points

Content (40 points possible)

Text Elements (10 points possible)

Graphics, Sound and/or Animations (10 points possible)

Writing Mechanics (10 points possible)

No more than 2 fonts are used. Text does not overwhelm the slide. Background is exceptionally attractive and appealing to audience. 9-10 points Enhance the presentation, highlighting the audiences understanding of the ideas. Graphics and text are synchronized, creating a pleasurable experience for the audience. 9-10 points The text is written with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 9-10 points A minimum of 4 resources are noted on the last slide. Clear and accurate usage of Turabian, APA, or MLA. 9-10 points (Derived in part from: http://www.rubrician. com/technology.htm)

No more than 2 fonts are used. Text does not overwhelm the slide. Background is attractive and appealing to audience. 7-8 points Assist in highlighting the audiences understanding of the ideas. Graphics and text are somewhat synchronized, creating a positive experience for the audience. 7-8 points The text is clearly written with little or no editing required for grammar, punctuation, and spelling. 7-8 points All sources are noted. There is a minimum of 4 resources used. Turabian, APA, or MLA used, but with some errors. 7-8 points

Ineffective use of background, bullets/indents, color contrasting, fonts, etc. Distracting to audience. 0-4 points Graphics and text appear to be largely unrelated to content. Animations cross over each other. Considerably distracting, busy, and detract from presentation. 0-4 points Profuse errors in spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and grammar requiring complete rewriting or revision. 0-4 points 0-2 resources listed with only slight to no difference between types of resources. Improper use of Turabian, APA, or MLA. 0-4 points

Works Cited (10 points possible)

13

4. Comprehensive Exam: 20% of your final grade A. The Comprehensive Exam is intended to assess your overall knowledge, understanding, and analysis of the course material. The Exam will cover all eight Units of the course. Preparation for the test should include (at least) all of the following: review of weekly quiz questions and answers; study and note-taking of the reading/viewing materials (and for oncampus sections, in-class lectures and discussions) presented in each Unit; and review of Discussion Board Questions, student responses, and feedback.

B. The Exam will be taken online during the final week of the course (Date). It will consist of 4050 questions (mainly multiple choice, multiple answer, matching, and true/false). You will have two hours to complete the test, unless otherwise instructed. The Exam must be completed by Saturday midnight, unless otherwise directed by your professor. (Locate the link for the Exam under Course Content and Activities, Unit 8). 5. Research Paper: 20% of your final grade A. General Assignment Purpose The Research Paper provides an opportunity to demonstrate knowledge and understanding gained from this course, while providing the professor a measure for evaluating your learning. Think of this assignment as a written articulation of cumulative learning gained throughout the course. Sources of ideas include the required readings, classroom lectures and discussion and/or online discussion board postings and feedback, multimedia and/or supplementary resources, literature research, basic reasoning skills, and introductory biblical, theological, and philosophical knowledge. B. Paper Overview/Outline/Content The Paper involves your development of a Christian philosophy (i.e., understanding and application of a biblically-based Christian worldview) pertaining to one particular aspect or issue of life (selected from the Potential Topics List below). Begin the Paper with a clear, concise introductory thesis statement (that is, an argument/claim that you intend to discuss and support in your essay, seeking to persuade your readers of your reasoned view/interpretation of the subject matter). Throughout the body of the Paper, describe and illustrate one or more vital Christian approaches to the selected topic. To complete this project successfully, you will need to study and analyze the work of two to three leading Christian thinkersthey may be from any historical era or cultural/global contextwhose attitudes and efforts reflect a rigorous, Christ-centered and biblical approach to the issue. Compare and contrast these leaders (for example, their approaches, and their particular views, their use of Scripture and other authoritative sources, and their experiences) in connection with the area of study. Also, incorporate into your essay course learning, reasoning, sources (properly utilized/cited), and personal calling. C. Potential Topics List Consumerism Culture Education Environment Health Care Individualism Justice (e.g., Social Work) Leisure Literature (e.g., Fiction) Media (e.g., Entertainment) Music Nationalism Natural Science Politics Postmodernism (e.g., Tribalism) Psychology (e.g., Therapeutic) Relativism (e.g., Moral) Scientific Naturalism Spirituality (e.g., New Age) Truth Vocation Work

D. 2500-3000 words in length (approximately 8 to 10 pages, typed, 12-point font, 1-1.25 margins)
not including the title page, notes, or reference page; use the Word Count function in MS Word.

14

Title page, section headings, page numbers, and reference page or bibliography should follow the appropriate style. (Papers under or over the word-range limit will be penalized.)

E. All papers and essays at Regent University must follow the writing style format required by the
degree specialty for which they are being written. The writing style to be used in this course is Turabian. Therefore, all citations and notes should consistently follow the Turabian format. However, students may use APA or MLA with the permission of the professor. Students will find the following book helpful: A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. 7th ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), Kate L. Turabian, Gregory G. Colomb, Joseph M. Williams, and Wayne C. Booth, eds. (ISBN-13: 9780226823379).

F. Papers should be written in standard essay format: introduction (with thesis statement), body, and
conclusion. All sources (for ideas as well as quotes) must be cited appropriately to avoid plagiarism and potentially serious academic consequences.

G. 2 sources (minimum) beyond course textbooks are requisite. Required course books may
and should be used, but they do not count toward this minimum. Internet sourcesother than complete scholarly books and articlesare not allowed in your research paper, including Google Books, Wikipedia, and previews. Again, sources other than your textbooks must be scholarly/academic (rather than popular). E-books and full-text articles (which can be viewed on your computer) from the Regent University Library databases (http://www.regent.edu/lib/) are allowed and welcomed as sources. English dictionaries, concordances, and study Bibles do not qualify as acceptable sources to meet the minimum requirements. Regardless of the form/media, books, essay collections, and journal articles are preferred.

H. Students will submit the Research Paper by the second to last week (Date) of the course. I. The Grading Rubric below is utilized for assessing Research Papers.
Activity Exemplary The essay includes a focused, polished thesis or solid organizing principle that demonstrates impressive conceptual clarity and precision pertaining to the stated position. 9-10 points The essay demonstrates exceptional critical thinking skills and includes wellchosen and effective supporting information, sound cumulative learning integration, and appropriate evidence for every point. This evidence is organized and presented persuasively, coherently, and logically, with smooth transitions between points. 18-20 points The essay demonstrates first-rate knowledge, understanding, and breadth of the topic discussed. This includes outstanding analysis of multiple perspectives, key contributions, evident limitations, and overall significance of these perspectives. Good The essay includes a focused thesis or organizing principle that demonstrates good conceptual clarity pertaining to the stated position. 7-8 points The essay demonstrates strong critical thinking skills and includes good supporting information, cumulative learning integration, and appropriate evidence for virtually every point. This evidence is organized and presented coherently and logically, with appropriate organization. 16-17 points The essay demonstrates competent knowledge, understanding, and breadth of the topic discussed. This includes good analysis of multiple perspectives, key contributions, limitations, and significance of these perspectives. 16-17 points Fair The essay includes a thesis or organizing principle that demonstrates adequate conceptual comprehension pertaining to the stated position. 5-6 points The essay demonstrates basic critical thinking skills and includes adequate supporting information, learning integration, and evidence for most points. This evidence is organized and presented logically, with passable organization. There may be logical fallacies or points un(der)developed. 12-15 points The essay demonstrates basic knowledge, understanding of the topic discussed. This includes satisfactory-yet-limited analysis of perspectives, contributions, and significance of these perspectives. 12-15 points Poor The essay lacks a clear thesis or organizing principle and fails to demonstrate conceptual apprehension pertaining to the stated position. 0-4 points The essay fails to demonstrate adequate critical thinking skills or include sufficient supporting information, learning integration, and evidence for most points. This evidence is presented illogically or disorderly. 0-11 points

Thesis or Organizing Principle (10 points possible)

Organization, Development, Integration, and Support (20 points possible)

Quality/Breadth of Content (20 points possible)

The essay demonstrates limited knowledge and/or understanding of the topic discussed. It fails to present sufficient analysis of perspectives, contributions, and significance of these perspectives. 0-11 points

15

Application (20 points possible)

Research, Documentation, and Formatting (20 points possible)

18-20 points The essay demonstrates exceptional ability to apply a Christian philosophy/viewpoint toward one particular aspect of life. This application includes a markedly wellreasoned and robust Christian approach to the topic. 18-20 points The essay demonstrates exceptional academic credibility and polished formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.). If outside sources are used, these sources are well-chosen through excellent research skills and flawlessly integrated into the essay. 18-20 points The essay demonstrates a polished and effective writing style. The tone and vocabulary are most appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose. The essay conveys an effective, distinct authors voice. The essay is free of errors in the convention of the English language. 9-10 points

The essay demonstrates considerable ability to apply a Christian philosophy/viewpoint toward one particular aspect of life. This application includes a well-reasoned and constructive Christian approach to the topic. 16-17 points The essay demonstrates good academic credibility and effective formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.). If outside sources are used, these sources are wellchosen through good research skills and effectively integrated into the essay. 16-17 points The essay demonstrates an effective writing style. The tone and vocabulary are appropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose. The essay conveys an effective, authors voice. The essay is mostly free of errors in the convention of the English language. 7-8 points

The essay demonstrates adequate ability to apply a Christian philosophy/viewpoint toward one particular aspect of life. This application includes a reasoned and practical Christian approach to the topic. 12-15 points The essay demonstrates basic academic credibility and suitable formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.). If outside sources are used, these sources are appropriate and suitably integrated into the essay, although there may be errors in documentation or less than thorough research. 12-15 points The essay demonstrates an adequate writing style. The tone and vocabulary are appropriate for the audience, topic and purpose. The essay gives the reader some sense of the authors voice. Although the essay may contain some errors in the convention of the English language, it will be free of egregious grammatical errors. 5-6 points

The essay demonstrates an inability to apply a Christian philosophy/viewpoint toward one particular aspect of life. It fails to employ a reasoned and practical Christian approach to the topic. 0-11 points The essay fails to demonstrate academic credibility and/or suitable formatting within the appropriate system of documentation (Turabian, MLA, APA, etc.) If outside sources are used, these sources are inappropriate to the essay and/or insufficiently documented or researched. 0-11 points The essay fails to demonstrate an effective writing style. The tone and vocabulary are inappropriate for the audience, topic, and purpose. The essay fails to give the reader some sense of the authors voice. The essay includes multiple errors in the convention of the English language, and some of these errors are egregious. 0-4 points

Style/Mechanics (10 points possible)

6. Class Attendance/Participation (online and/or on-campus): 8% of your final grade Online and/or in-class discussion will be graded on a combination of any or all of the following factors:

A. Willingness to engage the course material and the thoughts of the professor and other students B. Regular participation in online and/or small group discussions or projects. Students may be rated
by their professor and/or classmates for their contributions to such discussions or projects.

C. Questions raised or answers offered to queries raised by the professor and/or classmates D. Co-operation and decorum while online and/or in the classroom. Respect for all persons and
opinion of others must always be shown. 7. Educational Testing Services Proficiency Profile: 5% of your final grade Each student must complete the ETS Proficiency Profile assessment instrument. Completion of the ETS Proficiency Profile will result in obtaining 5% towards the final grade for the course. The test will take approximately 40 minutes to complete. A link will be sent to the student Regent email account prior to the test date. Students will have a 2 week window with which to complete the test. After the final date, the test will NOT be available.

Method of Evaluation 16

Weight

Discussion Board Postings (8) Quizzes (8) PowerPoint Project Comprehensive Exam Research Paper Class Attendance/Participation ETS Proficiency Profile Total

(percentage) 16 16 15 20 20 8 5 100

GRADING The following grading system is followed in the School of Undergraduate Studies: Grade A AB+ B BC+ C CD+ D DF Letter grades indicate the following: A AWork of superior quality in all areas. Work displays a mastery of course content at the highest level of attainment appropriate for the undergraduate level: outstanding quality of thought; excellent understanding of the course content and demonstration of skills associated with the course; a creative and critical engagement with the material; and an ability to analyze and evaluate the knowledge and ideas that shows talent for undergraduate work. Work shows practical or personal application of course content in specific assignments, as appropriate. The grade for such work will vary from A to A- according to the quality and quantity of the work. B+ B BStrong performance demonstrating a high level of attainment appropriate for the undergraduate level: high quality of thought; solid understanding of the course content and demonstration of skills associated with the course; an engagement with the material that shows good comprehension of the subject; and an ability to analyze and evaluate the knowledge and ideas in the course. Work shows practical or personal Percentage 93100 90-92 87-89 83-86 80-82 77-79 73-76 70-72 67-69 63-66 60-62 0-59 Quality Points 4.00 3.67 3.33 3.00 2.67 2.33 2.00 1.67 1.33 1.00 0.67 0.00 Failing Poor Satisfactory Good Meaning of Grade Superior

17

application of course content in specific assignments, as appropriate. The grade for such work will vary from B+ to B- according to the quality and quantity of the work. C+ C CSatisfactory performance demonstrating an adequate level of attainment appropriate for the undergraduate level: competent quality of thought; acceptable understanding of the course content and demonstration of skills associated with the course; an engagement with the course that shows adequate ability to analyze and evaluate; and adequate comprehension of the subject. Work shows practical or personal application of course content in specific assignments, as appropriate. The grade will vary from C+ to C- according to the quality and quantity of the work. D+ D DMarginal performance demonstrating a minimal passing level of attainment appropriate for the undergraduate level. The students work indicates poor quality of thought and poor comprehension of course content. Work shows practical or personal application of course content in specific assignments, as appropriate. F Unacceptable performance. The students work indicates major deficiencies in learning and reveals little or no understanding of course content. This grade denotes either unacceptable performance in spite of some effort, or failure to complete the assigned work. STUDENT COURSE EVALUATION Students have the opportunity to provide feedback throughout the course through e-mail, telephone, and on-campus appointments. Near the end of the course, students will complete an anonymous online course evaluation form. Since the results contribute to improving course design and presentation, it is important that students be honest and constructive in their evaluations. Students will receive an e-mail reminder from the University when it is time to complete these evaluations. Please take time to provide this input. Students can access the online evaluation system at: http://eval.regent.edu/regent/survey/students.cfm. If you have questions about the online evaluation please contact evaluation@regent.edu. This syllabus is subject to change without notice. Last updated: 2/28/2011 Regent University, School of Undergraduate Studies 1000 Regent University Drive, Virginia Beach, VA, 23464 Phone (888) 718-1222 2010 Regent University, All Rights Reserved.

18