Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CERAMIC BONDING
Bonding:
--Mostly ionic, some covalent. --% ionic character increases with difference in electronegativity.
Sc 1.3 Y 1.2
Rare earth series Actinide series
Table of Electronegativities
12-2
Adapted from Fig. 2.7, Callister 6e. (Fig. 2.7 is adapted from Linus Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd edition, Copyright 1939 and 1940, 3rd edition. Copyright 1960 by Cornell University.
12-1
CaF 2 :
Ca 2+ + cation
Fanions F-
Coord # 2 3 4 6 8
A m Xp
Stable structures:
0.732-1.0
Adapted from Table 12.2, Callister 6e.
Unstable
Stable
Stable
12-3
12-4
12-5
12-6
Na +
Cl -
Ca 2+ impurity
resulting geometry
Cl Cl 12-7
O 2resulting geometry
initial geometry
O2- impurity
12-8
MEASURING STRENGTH
3-point bend test to measure room T flexural strength.
cross section
L/2
L/2
d
rect.
R
circ. location of max tension
R
circ. = midpoint deflection
Flexural strength:
fail fs = m = Fmax
Typical values:
1.5Fmax L bd 2
x
slope =
E=
L3
4bd 3
rectangular cross section
or
L3 12 R4
or
Fmax L R3
Material
E(GPa)
300 430 390 69
linear-elastic behavior
max
12-10
SUMMARY
Ceramic materials have mostly ionic & some covalent bonding. Structures are based on: --charge neutrality --maximizing # of nearest oppositely charged neighbors
x
slope = ss = steady-state creep rate
Structures may be predicted based on: --ratio of the cation and anion radii Defects --must preserve charge neutrality --have a concentration that varies exponentially w/T Room T mechanical response is elastic, with brittle fracture and negligible ductility. Elevated T creep properties are generally superior to those of metals (and polymers).
12-11 12-12
time