Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 2 REASONS NUCLEAR ENERGY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED OR NOT .................................................................... 3 4.1 12 PRINCIPLES OF GREEN ENGINEERING ................................................................................................ 3 4.2 NEED FOR DIVERSIFICATION OF ENERGY SOURCES .................................................................................... 3 4.3 COST IMPLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 4 5. FACTORS THAT MUST BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE DECISION MAKING WHEN ESTABLISHING A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Agenda 21 ..................................................................................................................................... 4 5.1.1 MANAGEMENT OF RADIO ACTIVE WASTES ..................................................................................... 4 5.1.2 SCIENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................... 5
1. ABSTRACT 2. INTRODUCTION
Up until recent price hikes South Africas electricity was amongst the cheapest in the world. However, with the countries strong economic growth, rapid industrialization and mass electrification programmes all contributed to an increase in demand, by the year 2008, the country had reached a situation where the demand for electricity far exceeded what Eskom could supply ( Eskom is the state owned Energy company, responsible for 95 % of South Africas electricity supply). This large discrepancy between demand and supply led to nationwide rolling breakouts being implemented, in January 2008, in order to prevent the collapse of the national grid. As a result, Eskom embarked on a massive programme to both upgrade as well as expand the countrys electricity infrastructure. We need to have adequate electricity going into the future, was commented by Nelisiwe Magubane, Director General of the Department of Energy, about the situation. (Nelisiwe Magubane, Director General of the Department of Energy). Part of this plan includes Eskoms aims to double its nuclear energy output to 80 000 MW within the next 20 years, which shall account for approximately half of the new output capacity. (Reference). Thus, this report shall focus on Nuclear power and its ability to supply South Africa with green, safe, reliable and sustainable energy. This should be provided in usable forms as an alternative to fossil fuels and the deciphering of whether or not South Africa is in a position to expand its nuclear energy. The report shall therefore discuss the aforementioned topic with particular reference to; Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development Programmes Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Green Engineering Principles Life Cycle Approach
These shall play a key role in defining the factors that need to be taken into account with regard to the implementation of nuclear energy as an alternative energy source.
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
During the research phase of this report, the student aimed to attain articles from a diverse range of perspectives in order to acquire a complete all round objective view of the topic. From this the student was then able to take a stand point based on educated information and facts.
in South Africa, large emphasis needs to be placed on the energy sector to diversify the energy resources in the country and make use of renewable energy and low GHG emission energies to which Nuclear Energy is an alternate solution( National Climate Change Response Green Paper, 2010). Today it is known that Nuclear Power (NP) is one of the least carbon intensive generating emissions, and when considering the emissions from the full life cycle of the NPP, nuclear power produces only a diminutive fraction of green house gases when compared to fossil fuels (Government Gazette, Nuclear Energy Policy for the republic of South Africa, 2008).
5. FACTORS THAT MUST BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE DECISION MAKING WHEN ESTABLISHING A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
When considering factors to be taken into account for this report particular emphasis will be placed on both humanitarian and environmental issues and thus shall highlight consideration such as socio economics, sustainable development, and safe use of toxic chemicals and management of hazardous waste. Thus agenda 21 shall be used as an overarching framework from which to consider these factors.
5.1 Agenda 21
From the 3rd to the 14th of June 1992 172 Governments including 108 Heads of State signed and adopted 3 major agreements to steer future work, one of them being Agenda 21. Agenda 21 tackles todays urgent problems with over 2500 recommendations for action. Its aim is to prepare the world for the challenges of this century and contains in depth proposals in social and economic areas such as, combatting poverty, changing patterns of production and consumption, conserving and managing our natural resources and protecting the atmosphere, oceans and biodiversity. All of these afore mentioned topics are of extreme importance when considering the implementation of a NPP. 5.1.1 MANAGEMENT OF RADIO ACTIVE WASTES Although nuclear energy has significantly lower GHG emissions compared to that of burning fossil fuels, it produces both nuclear waste and spent fuel as a by-product both of which are extremely hazardous to human health and the environment. Hence it is imperative that before further
investment takes place within NE, that the correct systems, procedures and controls are implemented in order to safely process and store these radioactive waste materials. The most dangerous radioactive waste is high-level waste which (generated in the nuclear fuel cycle) and spent nuclear fuel. Majority of countries that have large scale Nuclear power programmes have adopted technical and administrative procedures for managing nuclear waste. Such systems need to be evaluated by South Africa before we proceed in further developing our nuclear power programme (Section II, Chapter 22 of Agenda 21) 5.1.2 SCIENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT An increase in scientific understanding of the connections between human activities and the environment is essential in creating sustainable energy solution for our country. Particular interest in the economic, social and natural processes that affect, or are affected by the atmosphere need to be taken into account when considering the use of Nuclear Energy. At the present moment South Africa is heavily dependent on coal which although cheap produces high volumes of GHG emissions. Thus a greater scientific knowledge needs to be gained in order to establish whether a move towards NE, which also has its negative impact on the environment in terms of radioactive waste, is indeed a more sustainable energy source. Further scientific knowledge also needs to be ascertained in terms of using integrated renewable energy sources which may prove to be not only more environmentally friendly and sustainable, but more economically viable.