Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
* Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of With the following substitutions: 0 = x / R , ~ = y/(L/2),
Technology, Kharagpur, India z = z/H, h = h/C (= 1 + e cos 0),P- ' = (p'/pa) 2 and ff = (p/pa) 2,
dW
S= - (9)
de
dW
Porous beorin 9
de
#%0
Fig 1 A gas-lubricated porous journal bearing where
SC
equations (1) and (2) for the case of uniform permeability S-= (10)
coefficients (ie k x = ky = kz) will be respectively: LD(Ps - Pa)
02p' 02p' 02p' Hence the slope of W versus e at any particular value of e
---- + (D/L) 2
002 ~y2-
+ (R/H) 2
T~-
=0 (3) gives the stiffness. However, a simplified formula in terms of
calculated W for small values ofe (e ~< 0.5) can be computed
using a linear perturbation theory with respect to e.
and
In these cases the stiffness
02]6 3 3P dh 32P A (OP']
--- + + (D/L) 2 - (4) dW W
002 h 30 dO 3y 2 h 3 ~32-]z=l S- - (ll)
de Ce
where where
(12)
C3H Ce
As pressure p is given by pressure p' in tile porous media at
Therefore, the stiffness at any radial clearance C can be cal-
the bearing surface, which is the boundary between the
culated from the dimensionless load W using equation (7).
porous media and the bearing clearance, ~ in equation (4)
can be replaced by ~' and as the pressure gradient across the The theoretically predicted results of bearings having LID =
bearing clearance is zero, ~' at ~-= 1 is the film pressure. 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 for various design parameters are shown in
Equations (3) and (4) are solved by iteration 7 in a finite Figs 2 - 4 . The load capacity in all cases increases with
difference form with a digital computer to determine the increase in the feeding parameter, reaches a maximum and
pressure distribution in the bearing clearance. Thus, with then decreases with further increase in A. Hence an appro-
the pressure distribution known, the load W and the mass priate value of A can be selected for maximum load capa-
rate of flow G at the bearing ends can be calculated from: city. With an increase in the bushing thickness the load falls
considerably and therefore, a one dimensional solution 3
L/2 2n which does not have bush thickness as a parameter is inade-
quate to predict the above behaviour. The flow rate in-
w=-2f f p'RcosOdOdy (s) creases continuously with increases in the feeding parameter
particularly at high values of A. It may also be observed
o o that the flow does not change appreciably with e. In this
connection it may be mentioned that there is no significant
and decrease in flow rate with increase in H. For this reason the
flow is shown only for HID = 0.1 (Figs 2 - 4 ) . From the
2.tr results it appears that the dimensionless load W reaches a
2C 3
G_ (1 +ecosO)3RdO (6) maximum value when LID = 1.0 for most feeding para-
127 ~ T f p, 3p' y=L/2 meters. The absolute value is, of course, higher at higher
0 LID ratios. Thus, an increase in the LID ratio does not result
in a proportional increase in load capacity.
The load and flow in equations (5) and (6) are computed
numerically and expressed in dimensionless form as: Design procedure
W The bearing can be designed either for maximum load or
W= (7) for maximum stiffness. The values of A which yield these
LD(Ps - Pa) criteria are different. Therefore, to fulfil a particular
design criterion the dimensions of the bearing must be
and found separately, the following worked example illustrat-
ing the method.
_ 24 • ~T
G- G (8) A journal bearing is operating at e = 0.2 with the following
c 3% 2 -
specifications.
0.5 50 //
o.s • =o.8 ,,// - :5.0
I~ 0.4 _
40 IO /,~-,oo 8
/ • -T2.a__ ~/.d'---, =0 5 ,o
/ f~ ~-- ~,=o.z
03 . .:o5~./ .:o5~..':'$.,3;"-~-,.... \ - 30 o,
~ - - ~ ~.
02 20
C--" - . J "%
1.0 I0
0.8 80 ~0 ,° 0.8-~///50
, =0s--y//
,=0.8~ ,=0.2
07 E = 0.5-~--~ 70
• =0.2 . - ~ 08 40
06 60
05 50
0.6 30
1~04 40 if,.9
Io
I.O I0 02 10
~ ~ , : 0 . 5 ~'---
i ~-~, =0.2
00.5 I .lO I C) 5, 0
I
.3 IJO I0 2 ,0
b A
0.8 80 IOi ~ 5 0
• =0.8-~
Q7 • = 0.5-~/ 70
0.6 60
o.SF Z" --14o
0.5 50
0.6- . ~ - 30
I~= o 4 ~~ - - o & ~ ~ 40 Io • =0.8 ~ ~ " "=0.8
I~= ~ -,=0.5 Io
• = 0.8
0.5 .'50 ..-.-.~ - - ~ .~..~. --, = 0.2
0.4 "~- 20
02 20 ,E =0.5 "" "'--
0.1 I0
0.2 - ~----~"~/ , _
_----------~ " " ' = 0.2 " " IO
"-----,=0.2 I
oc 5,) 0
L5 I PO I0
c A
Fig2 Load capacity for L / D = 0.5. (a) Ps = 3.0, (b} ~s= °(~3 I}) I() 2~°
c A
6.0, (c) ~ = 8.0*
Fig 3 Load capacity fi~r L / D = ]. O. (a} Ps = 3. O, (b) Ps =
* Figs 2 4: solid line represents w for HID = O.1, the dotted line 6.0, (c) -Ps = 8.0*
w for H/D = 0.2, and the broken line
05 50
,=0.8
04 40
. . . . . . .
s ~ ~,:o
_ _
• = O.8-~-~ 501~
20
~ . . ~ " ~ - - • =0 5
-~.-- ,~=0.2
=---'- "---,:o.z ~o I
°C).l I.O O6= I.O
a A b A c A