Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A M S C
A possible solution is the use of more than one IF stage. This can relaxed the specs of the filters and other building blocks. How many IF stages are required ?
This depends on the design specs, a rule of thumb is to keep the ratio between the operating frequency before and after a downcoversion should be lower than 10. Say for a signal at 900 MHz can be first downconverted to an IF of 250 MHz, then filter out unwanted signal and second downconverted to 50 MHz and in a third downconversion the IF is 10 MHz. How complex will be the filtering, power consumption and cost?
2
LNA
BPF X BPF
LO1
X
LO2
0
LO1
LO1
0 - LO1 LO2
LO2
Multi-Stage IF Receivers
From stage to stage the desired signal is further and further downconverted until the desired final IF is obtained. The ratio between the operating frequency before and after downconversion is usually kept lower than 10, say 4. For instance a 1800 MHz signal is first downconverted to a first IF of 450 MHz, then consecutively to 90 MHz and finally to 18 MHz. Note that each downconvertion stage has the same mirror frequency trouble than the single-stage IF receiver. Significant filtering between stages is required. This filtering is done with off chip filters to further complicate the sensitivity to parasitic components, also the power consumption will be high.
4
90o
90
A D C D S A P D C
D/A
PLL
PLL
0o
D/A
A complex mixer is required. In the DSP a complex non-linear algorithm control the DC-level dynamically. Low integration due to the use of SAW filters. Limited multi-standard ability.
Due to the difficulty to design broadband I/Q phase shifters an alternative solution (Weaver) solution is next discussed. 5 Analog and Mixed Signal Center, TAMU
AGC AGC
LNA
I LO1
Difficult Matching of I & Q Paths Operates with low IF1 and IF2
Q LO2
+j
+j
0 0 -j BPF
0 I A sin2 t cos2 t B
Image
+
+ 0
BPF
Main drawback of this architecture is incomplete image rejection due to phase and gain mismatch. Harmonics of the second LO frequency may downconverted unfiltered interferers from the first IF to the second.
0 0
What other receiver structures alternatives can be considered and with what properties ?
Can we make the IF very low, say to DC ? How and at what price ?
BPF
LPF
0 The LPF can be integrated. No image signal exists The RF spectrum is translated to the baseband in the first downconversion. The LO is equal to the input carrier frequency. This architecture operates only with double-sideband AM signals because it overlaps negative and positive parts of the input spectrum. For frequency and phase-modulated signals, the downconversion needs 9 quadrature outputs. Two sides of FSK (or QPSK) carry different information.
Direct Conversion Front End Receiver With Quadrature Down-Conversion for FSK (digital) Demodulation Phase Detector I
LNA BPF sin0 t cos0 t I
LPF
D Ck
Q
Zero IF
LPF Q
No image rejection filter is needed. Offset voltages can degrade the S/N and saturate the following stages. Isolation between ports is not ideal. I/Q mismatch degrades the downconversion constellation
10
FSK Direct Conversion Receiver.The frequency shift keyed signals appear with opposed relative phase at the phase detector, giving a binary mark or space output according to weather the input signal is lower or higher than the local oscillator frequency. Let assume these inputs (mark and space) signals are: S M = cos( + D )t
S S = cos( D )t The quadrature oscillator signals to the mixers are: LO I = cos t LO Q = sin t
The mixer outputs when a mark is sent are:
90
AGC
Allow for high level integration. Low power consumption. PLL Eliminate passive IF filters Good for SSB digital modulation Good Multi-standard ability.
DC offset problem. Increased ADC dynamic range. Because of limited filtering Need of a high-Q VCO.
Moves design efforts to baseband. Unprotected LO leakage into antenna. I/Q match required over high gain range
13
All advantages of direct conversion. More difficult image rejection. DC spur (offset) outside the signal bandwidth. Digital processing includes adjacent channel image rejection. All weakness of direct conversion without the DC offset problem. In Band image rejection.
14
cos (RFt)
BPF
-90
LPF
BPF
-90
Ilp (t)
cos (LOt)
The image input signal, for high-side injection of the LO, is v l,lm (t)=cos[( LO + IF )t].
vo ,Im (t ) = I lp (t ) + Qlp (t ) = 0 ;
15
Demodulator
Q Polyphase Filter
16
Publications:
2002 RFIC Conference, Best Student Paper Award (third place). Journal of Solid-State Circuits: January 2003 (Receiver) and August 2003 (Demodulator). Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: November 2003 (Complex Filter).
17
Power Amplifier A/D and D/A Converters Data, Voice Frequency Interface
Duplexer
Transmitter
Receiver
Reference Oscillator
Frequency Synthesizer
Processor
18
Wanted-120dBm -80
Gain of wanted signal > 100 dB Noise Figure of LNA input less than 8 dB
19
Subsampling Receiver
RF Stage
RF=1846MHz
IF to Baseband RF to IF
Subsampling AGC fs
Digital Mixer Digital LPF
o
RF BPF
LNA
IMG REJ
ADC
90
Digital LPF LO
q 2 digital low frequency mixers, no noise and distortion. q Easier I&Q matching. q No DC offset and 1/f noise. Aliasing q More digital means easier integration on a CMOS process. q SNR degradation due to noise folding q ADC & SH have to run at high clock to minimize noise 20 folding.
Example: 1.8 GHz GSM Specifications: IF carrier frequency = 246 MHz, Channel BW = 200 KHz, Input Dynamic Range = 90 dB .
2fs
The sampling rate, fs, can be much less than the IF carrier. But, fs > 2BW must be satisfied (to avoid destructive aliasing).
21
Wideband IF Receiver:
LNA
90
HF LO PLL
PLL LF LO
4 Allow for high level integration. 4 Relaxed RF PLL specification, VCO could be made on-chip. 4 Channel-selection performed by IF PLL lower the required divider ratio. 4 Good Multi-standard ability. 4 Alleviated DC offset problem. 8 Increase of 1dB compression point of second set of mixer. 8 Increased ADC dynamic range because limited filtering in comparison with the heterodyne receiver. 22 8 Feasibility has not been proven for GSM. Analog and Mixed Signal Center, TAMU
LNA
AGC
ADC
DDC
DSP
PLL
vMore digital parts allow for higher level integration. v Relaxed RF PLL specification. v No I&Q mismatch. v Good Multi-standard ability. v Increase of 1dB compression point of LNA and mixer. v Critical performance required of ADC. v High performance required of DSP.
23
IF-Sampling/Digital I&Q
Reduces receiver size by eliminating IF stages New architectures using more digital processing
Multi-mode, Wideband
Large reduction in receiver size Major architectures shift to DSP-intensive radio, highly programmable
24
Software Receiver
LNA
ADC
DDC
DSP
Band Select High Intercept Point Amplifiers Filter Remove Amplify signals without the unwanted spectrum introduction of significant intermodulation products
High Intercept Wide Dynamic Fixed Function Fast DSP Point Mixers Range ADC DSP digitally with on-chip selects and translate digitize entire Memory filters the demodulates input spectrum spectrum for to ADC signal digital channel channel of signal bandwidths interest selection
25
SOFTWARE RADIO
Antenna RF (1-2 GHz) LNA+ VGA Digital bitstream BPF ADC DSP
Idea introduced in 1991 by Joe Mitola Direct RF digitization Single / multiple channels sets ADC BW Reconfiguration by DSP software programs
26
BPF
LNA
VGA
LO1
IF digitization No specific standard for IF location Reduced DC offset, flicker noise problems
27
Literature survey
Ref
Vessal (JSSC 04) Kaplan (CICC 03) Chandrasekaran (CICC 02) Cherry (TCAS 2000) Gao (VLSI 98) Jayaraman (GaAs 97)
Type
Nyquist (FI) CT BP S? SC LP S? with mixer CT BP S? CT BP S? CT BP S?
Tech
SiGe HBT InP HBT 0.25m CMOS 0.5m SiGe 0.5m SiGe GaAs
1 1 0.8
4 4 3.2
28
29
Europe
2412-2472 MHZ 5 MHz
Multiple access CSMA/CA method Duplex method FDD Users per channel Modulation Peak bit rate 255 OPQSK, BT=0.5 250 kHz
Parameter
800 MHz
1900 MHz 1850-1910 MHz 1930-1990 MHz 1250 kHz 48 CDMA/FDM FDD More than 15
QPKK/OQPSK
Asia 1920-1980 MHz 2110-2170 MHz 1250 kHz 48 CDMA/FDM FDD More than 15
QPKK/OQPSK
Mobile-to-base 824-849 MHz frequency Base-to-mobile 869-894 MHz frequency Channel spacing Number of channels 1250 kHz 20
Multiple access CDMA/FDM method Duplex method FDD Users per channel Modulation Channel bit rate (chip rate) More than 15
QPKK/OQPSK
1.2288 Mb/s
1.2288 Mb/s
1.2288 Mb/s
31
UMTS/DCS1800 Specifications
DCS1800 Frequency Band Channel BW System Sensitivity BER
1805 - 1880 MHz 200 kHz -102 dBm
UMTS
2110 - 2170 MHz 5 MHz -117 dBm(@32ksps) 1e-3 10 - 15 MHz: -56 dBm 15 - 60 MHz: -44 dBm 60 - 85 MHz: -30 dBm > 85 MHz: -15 dBm 5 MHz: -52 dBm
1e-3 600 - 800 kHz: -43 dBm Blocking 800 - 1600 kHz: -43 dBm Characteristics 1600 - 3000 kHz: -33 dBm > 3000 kHz: -26 dBm Cochannel: -9 dBc Adjacent Channel 200 kHz: 9 dBc Interference 400 kHz: 41 dBc 600 kHz: 49 dBc
32
-114 dBm
ADC
13 dBm -60 dBm
-99 dBm
-77 dBm
Gain: 10 dB Gain: 15 dB Input 1dB Input 1dB compression: -13 dBm compression: 2 dBm
33
To ensure that the quantization noise power is negligible compared to that of In channel interferers and other sources of thermal quantization noise BW=200 kHz and device noise, choose SNRQF = 20 dB With Fs = 150 MHz, calculated resolution of ADC is 11 bits. The SFDR (for single blocker) can be calculated by: SFDR = PB - Px + SNRQF = 93 dB Required ADC Spec.: FS >= 150 MHz, b = 11, SFDR = 93 dB Current State of the art ADC: Fs = 80 MHz, b = 14, SFDR = 100 dB(AD6644)
34
LNA
ADC
13 dBm
Sensitivity (DCS1800/UMTS)
The maximum signal -26 dBm(DCS1800) or -30 dBm(UMTS) is at FS, therefore SNR of the signal is : - DCS1800 68 + 28 = 96 dB (68 dB is from 11 bits ADC, 28 dB is from processing gain) - UMTS 68 + 15 +21 = 104 dB Most processing algorithms require 10 dB SNR minimum for a reasonable bit error rate - Therefore, the -26 dBm signal can be reduced by 86 dB (96 - 10) for DCS1800 and -30 dBm signal can be reduced by 94 dB (104 - 10) for UMTS before too little SNR remains. Sensitivity would be -112 dBm (-26-86) or -124 dBm (-30-94) minus NF and multi-carrier guarding.
36
REFERENCES
[1] B. Leung, VLSI for Wireless Communication Prentice Hall, Upple Saddle River,NJ 2002
[2] T. Lee, The Design of CMOS Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits, Cambridge University Press, 1998. [3] C. Chien , Digital Radio Systems on a Chip, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2001. [4] B. Razavi, RF Microelectronics, Prentice Hall, Upple Saddle River,NJ 1998 [5] A. Bensky, Short-range Wireless Communication: Fundamentals of RF System Design and Application, 2 nd Edition, Amsterdam, -Newnes-Elsevier 2004
37