The Pantayong perspective and the issue of AGENDA BEFORE THE DIFFERENT MOVEMENT academic and socio-political

Nancy Kimuell-Gabriel San Beda College Alam nyo, nagdalawang I think receiving this subject because for me is delicate and not awtoritatibo this matter. But because of the napasimulang tradition of "friends pantayo," and to urge good friend, Prof. Hernandez decided to try write anything here and I know that ultimately ignored the ensuing polemic here. I said because that tradition beginnings turn pantayo network, responsive oration. All can join. All cooked freely sell their ideas. It is like a cafe that is open to all to eat. Many of the ideas here are a result of my communication with Dr. Salazar in August. Rainy months and that was long vacation. We had Dr.. Salazar you can exchange ideas on the net about Pantayong perspective in front of other political agenda. I'm not sure I properly malalagom idea I threw him the question. But I am sure, the answer was driving me to the new questions that we discuss naituloy entrance because I was busy and every one of us.

1. The Pantayong Insight is not a movement with a political agenda. Nor is it

idyolohiya. It was a conversation of magkakababayang decided to talk talk with the vernacular. Criticized by some scholars as being the purist, exclusive and "inward" to limit to join others in conversation (Abinales and Guillermo). But you should understand that the mission of Pantayo will use the language and culture to the study of history. So all of those joining have talastasang decision making. Not worried Pantayo if he understood outside the country, foreign or local scholars since its concern is over whether he understood the people that he wants to include in the conversation and participate in steerage own history and future.Although the research language, it appeared that 85% of Filipinos are conversant in Filipino (Benilda Santos, The Filipino Language Within and Outside the Academy) so Pantayo napakalehitimo of interest to keep the conversation in the broad language of the wider number of Filipinos. This may be strictly Pantayo allies of the Language Movement in the Philippines that promotes the use and further intelektwalisasyon our national language because the same parents, schools, cultural desires them. Not narrow and exclusive as the pantayo millions of Filipinos then sought to understand and be part of this negotiation. Becomes narrow and exclusive only to those who until now has refused to Filipino makipagdayalogo probably because 1) there is a limit Filipino language skills because more nahulma in English (like the problem some mix), 2) with regard Manila Tagalog and Imperialism it, 3) still wrapped mentality of excessive admiration in English and considered one's own wise and say words when in English and 4) Intentional without regard to originality and

5) All of the above - or all of the above. However, compared to only some people who are not really iingles in everyday life. Although the media, noted the continued growth in the use of Filipino language, not just in news and public affairs but also in imported're telenobelang Tagalog, television series and even the regular day programs day. This sense of Pantayo. Can not tell others to "remove the sense you." It's important that includes all the conversation and the people must be involved Dyan. But also like other katalastas opinion, this first step just because the situation in our society etsapwera the people the discourse of the elite in English. According to Dr. that. Salazar, "The goal is simple PP. In the field of academics (because that started with historiograpiya and social sciences), produce talastasang the language of the people and nation, one's own central conversation in which the language, like other normal total socio-cultural-political , cf. Japanese, French, German, Russian, etc..Combined with this: release in English and in pagkadagan its mental and thinking Pinoy (especially Inglesero, because unjoin the city and its culture, the psychological framework is in doubt and not really available to us. In general , PAGPOPOOK OF ALL PEOPLE. "(Interview, May. 19, 2007). This I see another answer to the question of why so many students in Pantayo nararahuyo. First, they understand the question. Makisabat hard to talk if you do not understand. In my teaching experience of 9 years, more easily understand and makapagpahayag the student's own language. Over expression also clever and exactly say they want to say. More rich continuous discussion and we nakukuntento consistent with our discussion. Now we can not stop the fact that actually growing our own language and constantly weakened the English in the current generation. This is the reality. And it is a positive indication. The negative around here are trying to bring those still in English discourse due to various reasons eg.English is the language of globalization. No duty to teach history or write English. Because even though Constantine was Agoncillo or what you read, say they also need a true insight Association and the English is a tool of colonization and conquest of consciousness. Let us in the English Department this task After all of them really work it. The role of history maipaunawa to people who they are, where they came from, what happened to them, why it happened and help them decide where they want to go, the language and manner they understand more. The language has also become tools of colonial consciousness washing. What's wrong with this goal? Is it wrong to live the lessons of history? If ever strictly Pantayo using the national language, that is because IT IS HIS BRAND; his identity. Important to Pantayo the originality. All have the right to impress on its own, individual or organization, how he wants to identify and create influence others. If this means getting to know the Pantayo, that is because they stand to use the language of

the people for history and continued strengthening of the town. I think that's ripe kapantasang Association to develop our own theory and method. Why not? Over 50 years ago since leaving the Americans in our country. Be there to that Filipino psychology, Pilipinohiya and Pantayong Vision for the project of developing self sangkaPilipinuhan and develop theory and metodo real Filipinos. The need to do is expand its inaatupag not just confined to identifying itself but push more do what is best for the people. Naitatanong others, sure enough the discourse on Filipino PP? Okay Does an individual or group long-Filipino nagpi even harmful to people the content they say? Does Pantayo cast one who iingles but for the people also told her and maintained? The answer here is not. Must be content with it. The nillaman stands for the town. No content may comprise the interest of the whole, because the interest of Filipinos in the middle of share classes. This historic. Plebeyo-new small-confident man Vs. Dakulang Sadit or man / Elit. So the chase is the content that serve the majority oppressed - they are tinimawa for so long. Nor should reject the one who Pantayo iingles but also stands for the people told her. They must do is convince Pantayo he did translate it and join the conversation. As suggested Bomen Guillermo (New Directions for Pantayong Insight) and as long as doing Nilo Ocampo. Although some aspects of the Pantayo here is "even more reactionary enter ideas, in this Association, the Town participate in the discussion and be able to analyze the advantageous or disadvantageous to him." For me, many of the corrupt, reactionary conservative ideas and getting people from government, media and church and family so although I prefer to concentrate on nilalalamang makes sense to them and will free their minds and I can not take the time uubusan useless talk. Not balance the streams of information because it kinakasangkapan influential in our society. So the vision here, do not invite more sense not provide. Invalidate only reason why we study history. Are all nagpiFilipino is Pantayo? My answer is not here. Although Dr. Salazar maybe yes. There are nagpiFilipino because it improved their skills, or so, it chose to serve the language, Yung others, have different political agenda or cultural purposes beyond the Pantayo, meron were also not accepted the principle of Pantayo, and there Contracting is also simply not known in Pantayo but still prevailing interest to speak the language of the town. The stance here, not to be sensitive here Pantayo. First, I met his interest to expand the conversation to ipasya of the scholars and historians that they magFilipino. Second, branding is not mandatory Pantayo. At a minimum, researchers must have recognition

value Pantayong conversation and a willing acceptance researchers it is driving him for example to learn the theory and method of research sponsored by Pantayo.

2. All researchers are nakapook. Researchers deciding if he popook in town or not. In Pantayo the tumatahing love interest of all the people. Important then our interpretations and pagpook in PUBLIC. All pagdadalumat have served, all thoughts and actions of man, consciousness or not. This may be to fully understand ourselves and personality, may for social change or keep the current arrangements, to further decay or liberation and development. Consequently, any pagdadalumat therefore should have to serve - for the people that do or not. For the majority or less. For ikalalaya that we do or not. No paggitna, because I think that's the reality of our society and perhaps all societies. The historic schism in our class and even the people (indigenous and under the huge cultural divisions) are still classified. Not all Filipinos can come together and side. For example, I can not accept if I offered a "sisterhood" GMA for the chief reason he is now the excitement of the city, not only because she Inglesera. I mean, even the sides of the city, our divergent interests and political standpoint. I will not accept Erap even though he has the most potential for advancing the language if the policies and programs I have not really frees nagtutuloy only poverty and programs initiated by the elite for their own. Probably I will support a president speaks in the language of the people and programs serving very kumakalas the dictates of WTO-GATT, JPEPA, IMF, WB and other imperialist institutions.Magmomobilisa and chief of the town for this act and quench katimawaan town. The town is "the Kapilipinuhan, the people of both states" language "and" culture "that roots and its covered by the categories contained valid here. This also means the "place" is the "quantum" as the goal of any movement. At this point the "place" he has both the Kapilipinuhan and the country can develop it. Right now, Tagalog Filipinos or applies both across and the country can unite or shaping it. "(Salazar, August 18, 2007) Every example I use the word motherland, I nagpapatungkol Philippines, our country, the place denotes both the language and culture of our roots. Similar to its use of the town. The town is also on my using the napapagsamantalahan and oppressed. We call it the people in the late 19th century (the plebeyo, confident and kailian, the Polista), CHILDREN destitute people and the early part of century 20 and MASA now - they are offended and exploited. They tinimawa or binusabos own place of birth. And they are the majority. I have not separated the economic and cultural approach to PUBLIC. They are after all, are under the huge cultural divisions Dr. teaches us. Salazar. They speak the language itself and dayalekto the Philippines.

Since I defined this town, it's important for me that Outlook is committed Pantayong for young people, in the confident, the toiling masses. Class standpoint of the Marxist call it. Thus I used the word ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE, it referred to here are the oppressors and exploiters and all their instruments mainly to the State Inglesero (who argued once again to restore English as a means of teaching).

3. Pantayong Outlook open all directions even in the class standpoint. According to Dr.. Salazar, he opposed it. "PP Accept all directions, the only important nakapook this city, and town special judge (has the right to decide) any goals." He has prescriptions for the country, the people themselves decide about it, with the help of his mamarapating or ask for help or include in his determination. He will follow any mapapagpasyahan town. And here comes his appreciation with ERAP as chosen by the people everyone wants magpapili the people (from both the Right and the Left and from any place). "In any decision of the town, this benefit or malilintikan. I think also, no people, mainly Filipinos, very stupid and select malintikan hold. There is also people who make mistakes in his selection and hold. " "More important to me the country and national unity rather than class, though the subtle interplay of class, I present the side of the oppressed or, more specifically, on the sides of the city and not a" nation "of the elite. Left not against the PP. In my opinion, this parallel of the "Left" to receive this category of the West and the French parliament "restoration". We say, as many left that are not too kind pagkapook ideology, nationalist PP. But not the Town PP tools, Tool its learning of language and culture of the Town to further understand the history. " Since Pantayo indeed like a conversation cafe open to all like to eat, it serves a large marketplace of different ideas and idyolohiya. You're right or left, you can go and sell your ideas and debate, as long as you do it in the language itself. Because according to Salazar, "I trust katalihuhan Coz the PP in the town. No Children Association (colonialist outlook and outlook of the Church must also protect the "charge" to the temptation of "evil."). People need to know the options. Whichever the chosen people, the city is also responsible, benefit or not. Long history. Learn and learn the city, more than the individual intelehente altogether. " Should people really be understood by their own choices - whether it is Marxism, revolution, parliamentary system, "democracy" - or even "post-istrukturalismo" or "post modernism", if we ever understand it. The efforts to enter into discourse Pantayo the people to understand his ikikilos selects and I think the prime Pantayo. But here also the limits, but any weakness. First, I do not believe there should be no pain prescription town because it is not true for us. As educated people who have decided to return to the city and promote the welfare of the people, we have a way of knowing the condition and

analysis of society, favorable and prejudicial and function or role of intellectuals to let the town review and contention that we think will harm them and makakapagbilanggo makapagpapaginhawa or makakapagpapalaya and their condition. Except for showing them the different views and options, including the people we should also conducting the options they choose. If you choose examples of people who jump into the gorge to determine if it is deep, could we prevent people to do this and show him to be aware that deep abyss without jumping? So the main functions of Pantayo is also mulatin themselves to not be part of the corrupt and reactionary thoughts and be tagapamandila of liberating consciousness. Not enough just ifacilitate discourse we need also a clear stance on the dispute. Secondly, if we maninidigan for small, Pantayo always available for project example of reactionary politicians like humamig vote during elections, idyolohikal scheme for consolidation of their regime (such as Project Destiny, Cruz Salazar, " The Historiograpiya of Us ") and book example sumusuhay Erap (Salazar). Others may pretend to be interested in promoting the town but only kalinangang achieve their goal of pagpapabango limited to the masses to strengthen their power, manlansi, to spin in place. Not to actually change the human condition. I do not claim intellectual superiority of our nature than the people that decide as a whole, but we should not bumubuntot in the works if we were also able to speak or lead by virtue of our knowledge, awareness and skills. 4. Pantayo no political agenda. Or more correctly, the political agenda Pantayo will empower our own culture. In a communication to Dr. Lily S. Mendoza (August, 2007), cited nya that all synthesis is a political project. "What is the political project of this pagdadalumat? Kasi I do not believe that any discourse neutrality pangkaalaman / cultural. All pagdadalumat have specific purposes and uses, unlike the usual assumption of positivism that it's just innocent description naturalesa or reality. " I also immediately agreed to this view. For me, all pagdadalumat have served, all thoughts and actions of man, consciousness or not. This may be to fully understand ourselves and personality, may for social change or keep the current arrangements, to further decay or liberation and development. Consequently, any pagdadalumat therefore should have to serve - for the people that do or not. For the majority or less. For ikalalaya that we do or not. In my analysis, all participating in the conversation have interest parents, schools and cultural goals. I think it is a natural and legitimate interests of the Filipinos. It set out its role in the development of kalinangang Filipinos learning in Filipino history. Per say, its own projects yan. If there is sense in sangkapilipinuhan each project, I think, then we should not pinagbabangga and instead float the difference, which could interfere

immediately in harmony, more needs to find similarities and relevance to strengthen the support of the city. Lots academic movement - environmental, environmentally, for women, linguistic, historical, psychological, cultural, literary and many others who makakaalyado of Pantayo and could benefit if padadaluyin Pantayo their own language organization. Doing this other than knowing me. Using the widest setting language different academic movement. PP also Malay political agenda of socio-political movement but that perhaps the difference here. "PP more focused analysis and conversation about the town than mobilizing. It is centered in culture, though there are political implications are then kinasasapitan research, but the only inaatupag is to understand the people and the Philippine talastasang generate the field of academics in the field and also of the total culture. "(Salazar, August 21 , 2007) "Power is not the desire of PP. The goal is to become as powerful as our culture (and, may God make it so, civilization). It is not intended to establish a kind of state, protecting its aaaralan only kind of state or "quasi-state" formed and spread to the Philippines and sangkapilipinuhan. No mesyanikong PP goals because it has no know (or know metodong other) in the future. But it also analyzes mesyaniko movements, whether it is simply political religious. So whatever people want, if any political agenda to accept the people, it must be observed. "(Ibid) Will the PP Political Agenda? According to Salazar, "Many of the political agenda, but without knowing kalinangang town. chores that we have before, to recognize people, understand it, sick or otherwise. The agenda of the city is the only city formulate and decide where they lead. More people know what he wants. I mentioned that if ever sick people (town), better check first the person (or people) and not the carrying prescriptions (agenda). PP not only strengthen the city, in my opinion, as you are fighting for the town because they should really be seen primarily places the city. Those with agendas, they must present their agenda in the town. And to accomplish this, maybe they not only learn the language but its culture, its categories based on the message can accept or reject the city, should enter into talastasang town. " This is the interest of Pantayo pinakanagbubuklod network, participate in conversation to better understand itself, its history, and practice the techniques of knowing and research makaPilipino. Not much here pinapaksa politics and economics. Although each talking probably have its own politically biased. Nor mapaksa Unity political and even if sometimes only to debate. I see the need to strengthen the analysis multidisiplinaryong pinapaksa of pantayo particularly the embodiment of economic and political analysis. Inadequate kalinangang rooted in the discourse because many people need to explain the circumstances of people napatutungkol their poverty and

oppression. Well, in principle, this drug did not do Pantayo. It can do just that just do them in categories and culture of the people. I agree Pantayo sustained by the carrying agenda for the town because it washed colonial consciousness entered our groin, groin and depth. The sustainable use of language is especially nakapagtutulak understands not only to ensure the people are willing to say, but more love and padangalin themselves as Filipinos really care about people. The interpretation within the culture is reminiscent of how fit you are always claimed namumuwersa thoughts and be careful in the claims. It also gives hints in the form of movement that can perform any movement. On the other hand, can also confine Pantayo the cultural role it set for itself and not immersed himself in political struggles and economic need, must also be done especially if the fundamental change the state intended Inglesero. It is not practicable to pautay-utay way. Perhaps knowing Pantayo cultural revolution cultural implications of any project. Another probability is the Pantayo tag along "with whatever people want to do." I mentioned earlier that I do not claim intellectual superiority of our nature than the people that decide as a whole, but we should not bumubuntot activities If the city were also able to speak or lead by virtue of our knowledge, awareness and skills. 5. The reaction of the Movement May Pantayo Political agenda Simple just wants to happen Pantayo: create this conversation which harm the people in this talastasang themselves to reinforce the self-determination. Utilizing this tool language and culture to further understand the history. Simple only do that sort: nakapook you in town or not? Are you willing to accept whatever decision it or not? Rotating Do your actions and preokupasyon knowing and understanding its entirety or you have to do more here? Salazar thinks, both the Left and Right have wanted to do in town. As well as institutions such as churches, aid agency, and others. Differentiate their place, and every place kinatatayuang decides the goals, as well as people. Object only the people of their actions. Ie no self-determination the people, for the Left, for example, another preferred direction of the town, it is because of "false consciousness" of it. For the former colonialists and the present, because "fool" the people and needs edukahin (for the government, lalunang insist that they learn English to progress and many others). I think, clearly makes us the Right: the government and all the instruments and forces. And I believe, should be concentrated their attacks Pantayo because it is the enemy of the people, it pumeperwisyo their livelihood and safety. This bumibilog their mind to reinforce the system they dominate. It passes laws devastating language and cultural unity of the Filipinos. The state Inglesero this state who maintains cultural giant.

This clarification by Dr. Salazar, "The inglesero pagpupuna the state is doing a PP and more fundamental than that, because it's really state of the city according to our own history. Cf. Outline of History, especially those pagkokontrast the "nation" of the elite / elite Inglesero Vs. "Motherland" (King city) to be coming together of two of the "nation".Furthermore, saksaksan the criticism of the Left in the state Inglesero, but apparently not well understood because the people in the language of economics and not always obvious difference of mentality. Many other criticism in the state elite. He said there is no need any longer makisawsaw PP. " Others the quality of attacks of PP in the Left. The attacks of PP left, if any attacks, is committed to the intellectual discourse napasukang since kina Philippine Rizal - love sabhin, the problem of the Marxist Left is not far to the problem of liberalism by Rizal, they differ only in time. In brief, left with acceptable international ideological outlook of the West - ie, not just Western ideology, also Western culture, Western is also pointless. You in turn have different goals the city / country Association; open its future maybe not heaven or hell (Church) or no society type (Left), glory or justice to the oppressed. Not because I know (and no method of knowing) future. Started in the PP analysis of historical perspective (past) and went only to structural analysis of present society as a result of the past. The future is subject only talastasang people compete only where appropriate all kalinangang agenda within the city and, may God make it so, national civilization. But that is also the brand of the Left. The agenda is struggling for political and economic independence of the country. May they metodo knowing the condition of the town called social investigation, coexistence with the masses, using language understood by the masses. They claim the thoughts from the experience of other people who think they are valid in their project. Large differences they have prescription for the country and the Pantayo is not. Pantayo also criticized the use of foreign frame of mind applied to the internal state without consideration of what is inside. So the idea, the pagdadalumat, the categories and simbolismong generated is also foreign countries. To explain all this I'll still maybe a separate paper. Aside perhaps enough to say today that can use one for each one against the Right. Must find the associates and widest interests of the two: the love of BAYAN. The Left is magkapanalig Pantayo and promoting the interests of the People. The Enemy of the People's Right to be here and centered the pinakamalalakas and pinakamatatalas blow. Sanggunian (isusunod na lamang) Guillermo, Bomen Abinales Cynthia

Cruz at Salazar Demeterio Komunikasyon kay Dr. Salazar Agosto 18-21, 2007 Komunikasyon kay Lili S. Mendoza, Agosto , 2007