Promissory Note Serial Number: Present for payment to: US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION US BANK HOME MORTGAGE 4801

FREDERICA STREET P.O. BOX 200005 OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY 42304-0005 Re: DEED OF TRUST: MIN: 100021268300316458; LOAN NO.: 6830031645; FHA CASE NO. 561-8853895-703 Two Hundred Twelve Thousand One Hundred Ninety Nine and no/100 Dollars (U.S. $212,199.00); Delinquent Payment Amounts in Arrears $17,948.36; Other Charges, Costs and Fees $1,678.80 Date: July 1, 2011 From: Undra Christopher Watkins Domicile: C/o 4323 Cedar Street Tacoma, Washington, Republic usA Non-Domestic Pay to the order of: Two Hundred Twelve Thousand One Hundred Ninety Nine and no/100 Dollars (U.S. $212,199.00); Delinquent Payment Amounts in Arrears 17,948.36; Other Charges, Costs and Fees $1,678.80 The undersigned, herein after referred to as Maker, tender this Promissory Note, as an offer of performance for the express purpose to Pay, Discharge, and Extinguish all alleged obligations in Full, to the US BANK HOME MORTGAGE, hereinafter, referred to as Holder, for and on behalf of Undra Christopher Watkins, Maker. It is the express intent of the Maker, by this offer, to extinguish the obligation alleged by the Holder in full, be it a simple contract or a statute staple. It is well established in American Jurisprudence that an obligation is extinguished by an offer of performance. The undersigned Maker, promise to pay, discharge and extinguish this PROMISSORY NOTE upon presentment by Holder to the Maker, provided Holder fulfills the required conditions of presentment before or at the time of presentment, as follows: Conditions of Presentment: Maker reference to Washington statutory language and Civil Code Procedure is for the express purpose of acting as an aide to understand the nature and meaning of an offer of performance. Maker does not rely upon any statutes, State or Federal, for the legal and lawful significance of this tender offer. 1 of 7

This is a tender offer of performance to pay, discharge, and to extinguish all alleged obligations, in full, to the Holder. For the purpose of clarification, please take notice of Washington Session Law 1899 c 149; 1965 ex.s c 157, codified in RCW 62A.3-603, cross referenced with U.C.C. 3-603, or U.C.C. 3603, to wit: Tender of Payment: RCW 62A.3-603 (a) If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is governed by principles of law applicable to tender of payment under a simple contract. (b) If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender, of the obligation of an endorser or accommodation party having a right of recourse with respect to the obligation to which the tender relates. (c) If tender of payment of an amount due on an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the obligation of the obligor to pay interest after the due date on the amount tendered is discharged. If presentment is required with respect to an instrument and the obligor is able and ready to pay on the due date at every place of payment stated in the instrument, the obligor is deemed to have made tender of payment on the due date to the person entitled to enforce the instrument. Holder may accept this offer, reject this offer, or object to the mode of this offer. If the Holder objects to the Makers use of the Washington Session Law and Washington RCW an aide to understanding the nature and meaning of this offer, the Holder should lodge the objection immediately, and the Maker will resubmit this offer without any reference to the statutes of the RCW of Washington Code or Code of Civil Procedure and/or the Washington Session Law. For the purpose of clarification, please take notice of to wit: Presentment: RCW 62A.3-501 (a) Presentment means a demand made by or on behalf of a person entitled to enforce an instrument (i) to pay the instrument made to the drawee or party obliged to pay the instrument or, in the case of a note or accepted draft payable at a bank, to the bank, or (ii) to accept a draft made to the drawee. (b) The following rules are subject to Article 4, agreement of the parties, and clearinghouse rules and the like: 2 of 7

(1) Presentment may be made at the place of payment of the instrument and must be made at the place of payment if the instrument is payable at a bank in the United States; may be made by any commercially reasonable means, including an oral, written, or electronic communication; is effective when the demand for payment or acceptance is received by the person to whom presentment is made; and is effective if made to any one of two or more makers, acceptors, drawees, or other payors. (2) Upon demand of the person to whom presentment is made, the person making presentment must (i) exhibit the instrument, (ii) give reasonable identification and, if presentment is made on behalf of another person, reasonable evidence of authority to do so, and (iii) sign a receipt on the instrument for any payment made or surrender the instrument if full payment is made. (3) Without dishonoring the instrument, the party to whom presentment is made (i) return the instrument for lack of necessary endorsement, or (ii) refuse payment or accept for failure of the presentment to comply with the terms of the instrument, an agreement of the parties, or other applicable law or rule. Discharge and effect of discharge: RCW 62A.3-601 (a) The obligation of a party to pay the instrument is discharged as stated in this Article or by an act or agreement with the party which would discharge an obligation to pay money under a simple contract. (b) Discharge of the obligation of a party is not effective against a person acquiring rights of a holder in due course of the instrument without notice of the discharge. Condition Precedent for Presentment: This offer of the Maker to pay, discharge and extinguish all alleged obligations in full to the Holder, including any interest and penalties, is make dependent upon performance of condition to which documentary evidence showing the factual grounds of the alleged obligation, to wit: (1) Documentation that ht Holder is, in fact, the holder in due course of any written express instrument, note, contract or any other evidence of obligation, wherein the Holder and Maker are named as parties, bearing a bona fide signature of the Maker or bona fide signature of an authorized agent of the Maker, to which this offer of performance refers. The term Signature means and includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to authenticating the validity of writing. And, Bona Fide Signature in contracts, any symbol executed or adopted by a party attesting that the party voluntarily entered into the agreement in good faith, and that all terms, conditions, and obligations were fully disclosed, and that the party fully understood the consciousness of the instrument. 3 of 7

(2) Documentation that the Holder or an Agent of the Holder disclosed all the terms, conditions and obligations of any written express instrument, note, contract or any other evidence of obligation the Holder alleges the Holder is holding due course. (3) Documentation as to who performed the disclosure and what procedure was implemented by the Holder to insure that the Maker received full disclosure of the terms, conditions and obligations of any written express instrument, note, contract, or any other evidence of obligation the Holder alleges the Holder is holding in due course. (4) Documentation of the facts necessary to establish that the Maker is specifically and unequivocally make liable by law for the payment obligation alleged by the Holder; that the Holder clearly identify the particular applicable statute(s), code(s), and regulations(s) or corporate bylaws that created the liability for the payment of the obligation alleged by the Holder. (5) Documentation of the facts necessary to establish that the maker is subject to the legislative jurisdiction, regulation and control of the legislative or corporate entity which created the obligation alleged by the Holder. (6) Documentation of the facts necessary to establish that the Maker is specifically and unequivocally made liable by a statute staple for the payment of the obligation allege by the Holder, and clearly identify the particular simple contract, with the underlying confession of judgment and recognizance, that created the liability for the obligation alleged by the Holder. (7) Documentation of the facts necessary to identify the specific property upon which the obligation alleged by the Holder has been imposed by legislative enactment, statute staples, simple contracts of corporate bylaws. (8) Documentation of the facts necessary to establish that such property upon which the obligation alleged by the Holder actually came into the possession or control of the Maker. The Holder has the duty to produce for the Makers consideration all documentation required, upon which the Holder asserts the Holders claim of an alleged obligation, immediately prior to, or at the time of presentment of this note to the Maker. Should the Maker receive no response from the Holder, such lack of response shall be deemed by the Maker as a rejection of the Makers tender offer of performance, as such a lack of response and rejection by the Holder would mean that there is no factual basis for the Holders claim of an alleged obligation. The courts have constantly affirmed and upheld the nature, meaning and effect of an offer or performance, such as this offer of the Maker to the common law as codified by the California Legislature: 4 of 7

A tender is an offer of performance, made with the intent to extinguish the obligation (Civil Code, Section 1485). When properly made, it has the effect of putting the other party in default if he refuses to accept it. (Weisenberg v. Hirschorn, 97 Cal. App. 532, 275 P. 997; Lovetro v. Steers, 234 Cal. App. 2d 461, 44 Cal. Rptr. 604; Holland v. Paddock, 142 Cal. App. 2d 534, 539, 298 P. 597) An offer of performance, including the exercise of an option, is ineffective if it imposes conditions upon its acceptance which the offeror is not entitled to demand. (Civil Code, Section 1494; Schiffner v. Pappas, (1963) 223 Cal. App. 2d 526, 35, Cal. Rptr. 817). However, the imposition of such conditions is waved by the offeree if he oes not specifically point out the alleged defects in the tender. (Civil Code, Section 1501; Code of Civil Proc., Section 2076; Hohener v. Gauss, (1963) 221 Cal. App. 2d 797, 34 Cal. Rptr. 565). The rational of the requirement of the specific objection is that the offeror should be permitted to remedy any defects in his tender; the offeree is therefore not allowed to remain silent at the time of the tender and later surprise the offeror with hidden objections. Thomassen v. Carr (1967) 250 Cal. App. 2d 341, 349, 350, 58 Cal. Rptr. 297). A tender need not be kept good when it appears that it will not be accepted. Hossom v. City of Long Beach, (1943 189 P.2d 787, 83 C.A.2d 745). By failure to object to a tender as to the mode of the offer, the party to whom the tender is made waives the grounds of the objections, which he had an opportunity to state at the time and which could have been obviated by the tender. Smith v. Central & Pacific Imp. Corp. (1919) 187 P.456, 45 C.A. 384). Presumptions of Good Faith and Fair Dealing: The law presumes that parties act fairly and honestly, that their dealings are in good faith and without intention to cheat, hinder, delay or defraud another, and if any transaction called into question is equally capable of two constructions, one that is fair and honest and the other dishonest, then, in that case, the law presumes the transaction to be fair and honest. Therefore, the Maker is not going to conclude that the Holder is either manifestly attempting to put one over on the Maker by asserting an alleged obligation and liability where none exists, or attempting to collect said alleged liability, which the Maker does not owe, by fraudulent or deceitful means. Therefore, the Maker makes this good faith offer of performance with the intent to extinguish the liability and obligation alleged by the Holder.

5 of 7

Holder has ten (10) days from receipt, hereof, to protest the mode of the Makers tender offer performance to pay, discharge, and extinguish the liability and obligation alleged by the Holder, or serve notice upon the Maker that the liability and obligation alleged b the Holder has been discharged and extinguished, and that all liens, levies, mortgages, and/or deeds of trust on real, personal, tangible and intangible property have been released, satisfied or reconvened as the case may be. In the absence of acceptance of (or objection to) this offer of performance by the Holder, any further attempt by the Holder to collect the alleged obligation will be viewed by the Maker as Malicious Harassment with the intent to defraud. Holders failure to present this Promissory Note to the Maker within (30) days from the date that this Promissory Note has Discharged and Extinguished, in Full, any and all liability and obligation of the Maker to the Holder.

Done this

day of

, 2011.

L.S.

Sui Juris, Without Prejudice Undra Christopher Watkins, Authorized Representative

6 of 7

PROOF OF SERVICE I, , am a citizen of the Washington

Republic 1879, over the age of 18 (eighteen) and not a party t the within action. I hereby certify that service of the forgoing: Affidavit In Support of MEMORANDUM With Points and Authorities - Private Notice and Demand (This is not an offer. This is not a public disclosure.) Pertaining to Public Fraud, Law, Money and Commercial Paper; was made upon the party(s): Legal Notice & Caveat Promissory Note Number: US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION US BANK HOME MORTGAGE 4801 FREDERICA STREET P.O. BOX 200005 OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY 42304-0005 By depositing in the United States mail at: 4323 Cedar Street, Tacoma, Washington 98409, Registered Mail No. , on this day of July, 2011. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America (1787) and the Washington Republic 1879, that the foregoing is true correct and complete L.S. , Sui Juris, Without Prejudice Undra Christopher Watkins, Authorized Representative

Ex Dolo malo non oritur actio Promissory Note cc. US BANK HOME MORTGAGE 4801 FREDERICA STREET P.O. BOX 200005 OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY 42304-0005 7 of 7

Legal Notice & Caveat From: Undra Christopher Watkins Domicile: C/o 4323 Cedar Street Tacoma, Washington Republic usA Non-Domestic To: US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION US BANK HOME MORTGAGE 4801 FREDERICA STREET P.O. BOX 200005 OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY 42304-0005 DEED OF TRUST: MIN: 100021268300316458; LOAN NO.: 6830031645; FHA CASE NO. 561-8853895-703 Two Hundred Twelve Thousand One Hundred Ninety Nine and no/100 Dollars (U.S. $212,199.00) Delinquent Payment Amounts in Arrears $17,948.36; Other Charges, Costs and Fees $1,678.80 Tender of Original Promissory Note No.: The above referenced Note, attached hereto, is tendered to the Holder by the Maker in accord with Bankruptcy Proceedings of the United States Congressional Record, House Joint Resolution 192 June 5, 1933, 73 Congress, Public Policy [ P.L. 73-10] and Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89719 for the express purpose to pay, discharge, and extinguish all alleged obligation in full to the US BANK HOME MORTGAGE, for and on behalf of the Maker Without admitting and obligation, guilt, or granting any jurisdiction whatsoever. Caveat: The Holder may Honor this Tendered Note by accepting it in discharge of the purported debt; the Holder may negotiate this Note for good cause shown, or the Holder may Dishonor this Note by refusing to accept it or by failing to make presentment as directed upon the Note. Holder should seek competent counsel promptly to avoid and loss of rights or privileges relating to the tender of the Note and/or the underlying claim of a debt. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to All Agents 1 of 2

Re:

Re:

Signed by the MAKER this

day of

,2011.

L.S.

,Sui Juris, Without Prejudice By Accommodation --- No Dolus Undra Christopher Watkins, Authorized Representative

Ex Dolo malo non oritur actio

2 of 2

Affidavit In Support On the Soil of Pierce County ) ) ss. Common Law Venue, Original Organic Venue of the State of Washington) And Exclusive Jurisdiction The undersigned being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: From: Undra Christopher Watkins Domicile: C/o 4323 Cedar Street Tacoma, Washington Republic usA Non-Domestic Re: DEED OF TRUST: MIN: 100021268300316458; LOAN NO.: 6830031645; FHA CASE NO. 561-8853895-703 Two Hundred Twelve Thousand One Hundred Ninety Nine and no/100 Dollars (U.S. $212,199.00) Delinquent Payment Amounts in Arrears $17,948.36; Other Charges, Costs and Fees $1,678.80 US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION US BANK HOME MORTGAGE 4801 FREDERICA STREET P.O. BOX 200005 OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY 42304-0005

To:

Dear Lender: U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE Enclosed is a tendered payment in the form of a Promissory Note, Number: June 5, 1933, Public Law 73-10. Notwithstanding the fact that I do not believe that the debt is valid of bona fide, there appears to be evidence of fraud on US BANK HOME MORTGAGE. None the less, this Note is to offset the debt in the above matter. Put your legal signature on the Note and bring it to me for presentment, which will show me that there was absolutely no fraud involved on your part when presenting the reference Note to me. Pursuant to House Joint Resolution 192,

1 of 2

Dated this L.S.

day of

,2011. ,Sui Juris, Without Prejudice All Rights Reserved Accommodating Party

Undra Christopher Watkins, Authorized Representative

Pursuant to the Bible doctrine of two or three witness [Dt. 19:15, Mt. 18:16, etc] we put our hand to this instrument.

L.S . Signature of Attesting Witness

,Sui Juris, Without Prejudice

L.S. Signature of Attesting Witness

,Sui Juris, Without Prejudice

2 of 2

Affidavit In Support Of On the Soil of Pierce County ) ) ss. Common Law Venue, Original Organic Venue of the States of Washington) And Exclusive Jurisdiction The undersigned being duly sworn according to law deposes and says: From: Undra Christopher Watkins Domicile: C/o 4323 Cedar Street Tacoma, Washington Republic usA Non-Domestic MEMORANDUM With Points and Authorities - Private Notice and Demand (This is not an offer. This is not a public discharge.) Pertaining to Public Fraud, Law, Money and Commercial Paper Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent Applicable to all successors and assignees To: US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION US BANK HOME MORTGAGE 4801 FREDERICA STREET P.O. BOX 200005 OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY 42304-0005 To Whom These Presentments Shall Come; Greetings; Take Notice: 1. That, prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court Decisions were based upon what is Termed: Public Law or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. After 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court Decisions have been based upon Public Policy concerning commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument Law, as a result of the U.S. Bankruptcy as declared by President Roosevelt on March 9, 1933, and codified at 12 U.S.C.A. $ 95a and by Executive Orders. This bankruptcy caused the change from Public Law to Private Commercial Law and was recognized by the Supreme Court in Erie v. Thompkins, 1938. After that case, all the procedures of Law were Officially blended with procedures of Equity.

1 of 7

2.

That, the Negotiable Instrument Law is a branch of the International Law Merchant which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, (UCC) that Was drafted and made uniform, and adopted in whole or substantially by all states. Blacks Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition page 1531. Thus the several states were and are bound into Commercial Agreements to the federal United States under the Uniform Commercial Code. That, the several (now 50) STATES accepted the benefits of federal grants Offered by the FEDERAL UNITED STATES as consideration of a commercial Agreement between themselves. Under the agreement the States (Conference of Governors, March 6, 1933) pledged their full faith and credit and agreed to obey The dictates of Congress, and assume their portion of the National Debt, Collected as your fair share, as an example, in the nature of the voluntary Income tax, wherein the IRS operates and collects such taxes under the same UCC. That, this system of Negotiable Paper has bound all corporate entities (cities, municipalities, counties, etc.) of government together to the process/system of the (public) Commercial Venue of Commercial Law. This nationwide Commercial Bond also altered the original (law) status of the Courts to nothing more than administrative tribunals merely administering the bankruptcy (private policy, Using private law) of debt collection for the Creditors. That, by and through the bankruptcy, the UCC, and other acts, Congress in Failing to uphold its constitutional duty to provide a lawful medium of exchange (i.e., money backed by silver and gold, or minted coin pursuant to Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 of our National Constitution (1787) have by these various Act created an abundance of this new type of fiat money called Commercial Credit Money to circulate within the Legislative democracy called the UNITED STATESof which they are not bound by Constitutional Law and Limitation. That, the Commercial Law Venue, compelled upon the people a forced benefit Of limited liability for the payment of debt by the use of Federal Reserve Notes (debt instruments) wherein YOUR debts are only discharged, (not In the form of interest-bearing negotiable instruments (Federal Reserve Notes). There is a distinction between a debt discharged and one paid. When discharged The debt still exists, though divested of its character as a legal obligation Stanek v. White, 215 N.W.R. 718 (1927). Federal Reserve Notes are only of Debt owed by the Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Reserve Notes are a Commercial obligation or lien on the Federal Reserve Bank.

3.

4.

5.

6. paid)

7.

2 of 7 That, since 1933, by the acts of the Bankruptcy and the UCC, the Law has been Tainted, or colored, (i.e., color of law) as it were, because the commercial law is Operated in through the Bankers, can/have declared that a piece of paper has And represents value. Albeit that there is no substance (gold or silver) backing the piece of paper, which the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in its publication Modern Money Mechanics, page 3, has in fact declared the use of these debt Instruments (Federal Reserve notes) a confidence game. The substance of the Law (property) (i.e., gold, silver, etc.) has been removed from the public, sector, Like the substance that is the basis of money, accordingly, Law like Money Becomes a fiction, make-believe or simply legal fiction. Therefore, in the U.S.A., by and through the UCC, all contracts, agreements, (implied, or Otherwise, etc.), applications, permits, etc. where the colorable consideration (Federal Reserve Notes) was passed in those contracts, etc. all such contracts Are then also colored and are not genuine, for no lawful consideration (gold/silver/substance) was paid or exchanged by either party to the contract To, by Law, pass both the possession and the property to the lawful Buyer. See Bouviers Dict. Of Law, 1839, TITLE, definition #5. The lawful coin the United States will pass the property along with the possession. That, today, all or courts (sic) sit as Non-Constitutional, Non-Article III Legislative Tribunals administering the bankruptcy through their private statutes Which are in reality commercial obligations for the benefit or privilege of Discharging your debts with the limited liability of the Federal Reserve Monopoly Colorable Money Notes! That, under the current colorable legal system, the de-facto (we just do it) Legislature has created colorable rights called privileges, imposes duties, lays Down rules of conduct, and the legislative tribunals declare the same as rights. These privileges are granted and given upon the peoples voluntary act of asking Permission, then upon providing any colorable consideration (payment= Discharge) the people then come under the administrative jurisdiction of Commercial Law. That, today, in America, everyone, all governments included, are statutory law Merchants dealing in negotiable paper (instruments) under the UCC for the Limited liability for the discharge of debts, wherein a debt remains (fraud) and Nothing else! The so called judges are operating only in a commercial tribunal to administer their corporate regulations concerning all financial transactions both voluntary and those compelled.

8.

9.

10.

11.

3 of 7 That, all debts are satisfied by one or both of two ways, payment, or promise to Payment, or a promise to pay. Every payment is by substance, and every promise To pay is accomplished by a currency or paper that is technically known as a Commercial lien or obligation. The satisfaction of the debt by providing substance is called paying the debt. The satisfaction of the debt by a written or printed Promise to pay the debt is called discharging the debt. All debts are paid by Substance. All debts are only discharged by Currency, Pocket Money Notes or Other Commercial Liens or Obligations. (Negotiable Instruments, i.e., Commercial Lien Security/Asset, i.e., UCC-1 Asset.) That, all paper money consists of Notes which declare a debt or obligation and which promise or demand payment. All such evidences of debt or obligations are technically known as Commercial Paper. Such Notes includes currency, for example, Federal Reserve Notes, checks, drafts, conditional checks, notes or exchange (paper money/instruments between banks). That, a Federal Reserve Notes is a commercial lien or obligation on the Federal Reserve Bank. A personal check is a commercial lien or obligation on the bank Account of the maker of the check (cheque). A draft is a check (cheque) with a Conditional agreement printed above the place of endorsement on the backside Of the draft. A note of exchange is a discharge from another bank. A personal Check (cheque), while passing between banks, as a note of exchange, is a Commercial lien or obligation. That, bank accounts are backed (supported) either by substance money or By paper money, or by both. The substance money is called collateral. The Paper money can be currency (for example, paper money notes), a loan of credit From the bank, or checks or the other paper money as such, are commercial liens Obligations, received from other sources. Therefore the property declared/ Pledged or claimed to secure the obligation, and damages, is the collateral Credit called commercial credit money. That, the people, men and women, operating in their private capacity, by And through the remedy provided in the Uniform Commercial Code at Article 9, and as a matter of right, secure their publicity created Straw Man And utilized the Commercial Law Venue against their employees, the agents Of government, their creations (corporations) and their officers (accountability= Liability), by and through basic contract law through acceptance for value of Their public offerings. That, these valid UCC Contracts are Commercial Paper, and using a bill of Exchange or documentary drafts are enforceable for the consideration due, by Having the fiduciary make presentment to the debtor, for the debtors acceptance Or dishonor.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

4 of 7 That, in the Commercial Venue, Holder in Due Course, being a Secured Party and Creditor, is the Super-Plaintiff and no defenses can rise against him. CAVEAT Upon receipt of this Memorandum of Points and Authorities- Notice and Demand, to the intended party, by Registered or Certified Mail or Personal Service, as either a Public Servant, Municipality, etc., and/or by and through your superior knowledge of the law, you have 10 days to review and correct any errors within The Memorandum and respond by Certified, U.S. Mail as to any corrections to the enumerated points herein. Failure to do so within the 10 days, the presumption will be taken upon the public record that you and your office fully agrees to the points and authorities contained within this Memorandum and that they are true, correct, and certain [F.R.C.P. 8d]. THE QUOTATION OF THE PRIVATELY COPYWRITTEN STATUTORY LEGISLATIVELY CREATED CASE LAW AND STATE AND FEDERAL STATUTES PURSUANT TO PULIC LAW 88-244, DECEMBER 30, 1963, IS DONE WITHOUT INTENT TO CREATE A USE OR VIOLATE ANY PRIVATE COPYRIGHT, AND STANDS SO UNLESS LAWFULLY PROTESTED BY ANY CONCERNED PARTIES. Dated this L.S. day of ,2011. ,Sui Juris, Without Prejudice All Rights Reserved Undra Christopher Watkins, Authorized Representative Pursuant to the Bible doctrine of two or three witness; [Dt. 19:15. Mt. 18:16, etc.] We put our hand to this instrument. L.S. Signature of Attesting Witness ,Sui Juris, Without Prejudice

L.S. Signature of Attesting Witness

,Sui Juris, Without Prejudice

5 of 7 Proof of Service I, , Sui Juris, Without Prejudice, am a citizen of the Washington Republic 1879, over the age of 18 (eighteen) and not a party to the action. I hereby certify that service of the foregoing: Affidavit In Support of MEMORANDUM with Points and Authorities Private Notice and Demand (This is Not an offer. This is not a Public Disclosure.) Pertaining to Public Fraud, Law, Money, and Commercial Paper; was made upon the party(s): US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION US BANK HOME MORTGAGE 4801 FREDERICA STREET P.O. BOX 200005 OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY 42304-0005

By depositing in the United States mail at: 4323 Cedar Street, Tacoma, Washington 98409, Registered Mail No. . On this day of , 2011. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America (1787) that the foregoing is true, correct, and complete.

L.S. Signature of Attesting Witness

Sui Juris, Without Prejudice

7 of 7 Affidavit In Verification State of Washington County of Pierce ) ) ss. Affidavit of Undra Christopher Watkins )

I, Undra Christopher Watkins, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America, 1787, specifically the laws of the Republic state of Washington 1879, that the following statement is true, and correct to the best of the Affiants personal knowledge, understanding and belief. The Affiant affirms that: 1. The Affiant is of the age of majority, of sound mind and competent to testify. 2. The Affiant affirms that all facts stated in the foregoing: 1) Affidavit In Support of MEMORANDUM with Points and Authorities Private Notice and Demand (This is Not an offer. This is not a Public Disclosure.) Pertaining to Public Fraud, Law, Money, and Commercial Paper; 2) Promissory Note; 3) Legal Notice & Caveat; 4) Affidavit In Support; are true, correct, and to the best of the Affiants personal Knowledge, understanding, and belief. 3. The Affiant has nothing further to state at this time. Done this day of , 2011.

L.S.

, Sui Juris, Without Prejudice Undra Christopher Watkins, Authorized Representative

SUBSCRIBED and AFFIRMED before Me, A Notary Public residing in Pierce County, the State of Washington, Undra Christopher Watkins, appeared known to Me and identified himself and did execute the foregoing Affidavit in Verification as a free act and deed affixing his signature hereto, the day of , 2011. Notary Public My Commission expires:

Seal

6 of 7