Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
t. myers
eng101
05 mar. 2008
portfolio 2 – rough draft 3
if you don't have anything beneficial to say, don't say anything at all
since the beginning of storytelling, there has been a constant distribution of ideas
that describes nearly any logical situation. in most stories, there is an antagonist and a
protagonist who are frequently engaged in a conflict of views, actions, and emotions.
often times, this scenario can apply to real life struggles as well. the current condition
regarding the feminist movement is an exception to this rule however. in the earlier
nineteenth century, there was a large-scale change in the way that women perceived
themselves socially. as with all earlier generations, this triggered a movement that defined
the times. in recent years, it seems that this emotional rat race has become somewhat
stagnant. some modern writers who think they are producing material that will excel
women's social standing are in reality the antagonists encouraging ideas that true
lynda barry has ventured into one of the most interesting and informal forms of
writing known to mankind; the graphic essay. although this is a much less serious form of
expression, authors are able to convey the precise imagery of their ideas. in barry’s
tomboy. she has no shame in her identity, but does not seem happy about her image at the
time. barry’s mother was one of the main factors attributing to her social image, as she
looked down at her with disgust in her choice of clothing and toys. the girly-girls couldn’t
be more disrespectful to barry, and it wasn’t until she met an asian girl named mariko that
she saw what an alternative home life would be like. mariko’s mother was even more
offended by barry’s appearance, and treated her like a rabid animal, not allowing contact
with mariko’s toys. later, mariko is heartbroken upon soiling her fancy tennis shoes in the
mud. these events help barry understand that being a tomboy has it’s advantages.
at the end of barry’s essay, she describes taking in a 13 year old girl named
norabelle. barry immediately begins buying her a tremendous amount of girly goods that
her own mother never would have allowed her to own. barry is hurting norabelle, by
giving her the very goods that would encourage the lifestyle of an unpleasant girly-girl.
by beginning to spawn another one of the people that made barry’s childhood miserable,
prager’s 1991 essay; “our barbies, ourselves”. prager manufactures the argument that
barbie was invented by a man who hoped to use it as a weapon to destroy the female
image. she then states her unhappiness with the barbie doll’s unnaturally proportioned
physical features, and even goes so far as to say it’s unfair that she never got to see the
ken doll’s genitals as a girl. prager’s reasoning for this displeasure completely disregards
the idea that mattel (barbie's manufacturer) probably didn’t want to become the world’s
leader in miniature plastic groin. does barbie’s love life leave too much to the
imagination? yes! barbie is designed for young girls who, for example, pretend to go
shopping with barbie. prager on the other hand, constantly fantasizes about the plastic
couple’s sexual exploits in a non-functional hot-tub.
prager feels that barbie’s physical complexion has resulted in the recent popularity
of plastic surgery procedures. in addition, the ken doll was so physically perfect that it
eliminated the author’s chances of finding a man that could fill the void that ken created.
now, the victimized author must face a life of solitude, thanks to the barbie doll
collection. however, prager “loved” her barbie, and is hardly qualified to write about
social trends caused by it. by publishing this article, she is only encouraging a reverse in
the progress made by women everywhere who are dedicating their lives to the social
advancement of women.
offensive language has been a part of human life since the beginning of
communication. basic rhetoric states that different people find different things offensive,
goal of an exchange is simply to offend. things that people cannot change usually qualify
as grounds for the most hurtful language, although some may not be bothered by such
statements whatsoever. in order for language to be truly offensive, the words used must
be specific to a racial, sexual, ethnic, social, national, or gender group. barbara lawrence’s
essay “four letter words can hurt you” describes how she feels about some of the
lawrence’s main argument is that women are being denied their individuality in
the eyes of society. she is calling for sexually charged offensive language to be brought to
public attention, as people may be unaware of the injustice taking place. lawrence
couldn’t be more wrong about the causes of this offensive language. the author thinks that
because women are socially insignificant, language has surfaced that describes how some
people view their status. women are actually a widely recognized group, and this
language has only surfaced to be used offensively, no differently than any other form of
disrespectful language. when used correctly, this slang can be extremely offensive, but
not differently than any other form of offensive dialogue used at most hurtful of times.
there will always be offensive language used specifically towards women. its existence