Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
DPGD/JA10/0312 FINANCE
SUBMITTED TO WELINGKAR INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH YEAR OF SUBMISSION : 2011
SIGNATURE OF GUIDE NAME DESIGNATION ADDRESS : : : Yogesh Varma Technical Head RnS Computers India. Chembur,Mumbai - 400088
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
With Immense pleasure I would like to present this report on Mutual Funds in India
I would like to thank Welingkar Institute of Management for providing me the opportunity to present this project.
My deepest thanks to Mr. Yogesh Verma- Technical Head(Rns) ,Mr. Ravindra Patil Relationship Manager (Robinhood Insurance Brokers) Mrs. Neha Dugar (Willis India) for their continuous help, encouragement and making available various reports and papers on the subject despite their tremendous work pressures.
I am extremely grateful to my guide, Yogesh Verma for their valuable guidance and timely suggestions. I would like to thank all my friends and colleagues for the valuable guidance& support. And lastly, I would like to express my gratefulness to the parents for seeing me through it all.
Executive Summary In few years mutual fund has emerged as a tool for ensuring ones financial well being. Mutual funds have not only contributed to the India growth story but have also helped families tap into the success of Indian industry. As information and awarenesss rising more and more people are enjoying the benefits of investing in mutual funds. The main reason the number of retail mutual fund investors remains small is that nine in ten people with incomes in India do not know that mutual funds exist.But once people are aware of mutual fund investment opportunities, the number who decide to invest in mutual funds increases to as many as one in five people. The trick for converting a person with no knowledge of mutual funds to a new mutual fund customer is to understand which of the potential investors are more likely to buy mutual funds and to use the right arguments in the sales process that customers will accept as important and relevant to their decision. This project gave me a great learning experience and at the same time it gave me enough scope to implement my analytical ability. The analysis and advice presented in this project report is based on market research on the saving and investment practices of the investors and preferences of the investors for investment in mutual funds. This report will help to know about the investors preferences in mutual fund means are they prefer any particular asset management company (amc), which type of product they prefer, which option (growth or dividend) they prefer or which investment strategy they follow (systematic investment plan or one time plan). This project as a whole can be divided into two parts. INTRODUCTION TO MUTUAL FUND AND ITS VARIOUS ASPECTS. Mutual fund is a trust that pools the savings of a number of investors who share a common financial goal. This pool of money is invested in accordance with a stated objective. The joint ownership of the fund is thus Mutual, i.e. the fund belongs to all investors. The money thus collected is then invested in capital market instruments such as shares, debentures and other securities. The income earned through these investments and the capital appreciations realized are shared by its unit holders in proportion the number of units owned by them. Thus a Mutual Fund is the most suitable investment for the common man as it offers an opportunity to invest in a diversified, professionally managed basket of securities at a relatively low cost. A Mutual Fund is an investment tool that allows small investors access to a welldiversified portfolio of equities, bonds and other securities. Each shareholder participates in the gain or loss of the fund. Units are issued and can be redeemed as needed. The funds Net Asset value (NAV) is determined each day. Investments in securities are spread across a wide cross-section of industries and sectors and thus the risk is reduced. Diversification reduces the risk because all stocks may not move in the same direction in the same proportion at the same time. Mutual fund issues units to the investors in accordance with quantum of money invested by them.
When an investor subscribes for the units of a mutual fund, he becomes part owner of the assets of the fund in the same proportion as his contribution amount put up with the corpus (the total amount of the fund). Mutual Fund investor is also known as a mutual fund shareholder or a unit holder. Any change in the value of the investments made into capital market instruments (such as shares, debentures etc) is reflected in the Net Asset Value (NAV) of the scheme. NAV is defined as the market value of the Mutual Fund scheme's assets net of its liabilities. NAV of a scheme is calculated by dividing the market value of scheme's assets by the total number of units issued to the investors. HISTORY OF THE INDIAN MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY The mutual fund industry in India started in 1963 with the formation of Unit Trust of India, at the initiative of the Government of India and Reserve Bank. Though the growth was slow, but it accelerated from the year 1987 when non-UTI players entered the Industry. In the past decade, Indian mutual fund industry had seen a dramatic improvement, both qualities wise as well as quantity wise. Before, the monopoly of the market had seen an ending phase; the Assets Under Management (AUM) was Rs67 billion. The private sector entry to the fund family raised the Aum to Rs. 470 billion in March 1993 and till April 2004; it reached the height if Rs. 1540 billion. The Mutual Fund Industry is obviously growing at a tremendous space with the mutual fund industry can be broadly put into four phases according to the development of the sector. Each phase is briefly described as under First Phase 1964-87 Unit Trust of India (UTI) was established on 1963 by an Act of Parliament by the Reserve Bank of India and functioned under the Regulatory and administrative control of the Reserve Bank of India. In 1978 UTI was de-linked from the RBI and the Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) took over the regulatory and administrative control in place of RBI. The first scheme launched by UTI was Unit Scheme 1964. At the end of 1988 UTI had Rs.6,700 crores of assets under management. Second Phase (1987 1993) Entry to Public Sector
of India with assets under management of Rs.29,835 crores as at the end of January2003, representing broadly, the assets of US 64 scheme, assured return and certainother schemesThe second is the UTI Mutual Fund Ltd, sponsored by SBI, PNB, BOB and LIC. It isregistered with SEBI and functions under the Mutual Fund Regulations. consolidationand growth. As at the end of September, 2004, there were 29 funds, which manageassets of Rs.153108 crores under 421 schemes.
PART- I CHAPTER 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Today India is on a threshold of massive development, thanks to the various initiatives taken by the Govt. of India over the last 10 years or as we call it the Dawn of the era of liberalization. The economic policies have been liberalized time and again to accelerate the process of industrial growth. The government is making constant efforts to encourage the entrepreneurs by providing the climate conducive for development and growth. as a result of which various projects are coming up and due to which various applications are being received by state and national financial institutions for financial assistance. Project finance is thus becoming a field of specialization in itself. Project Financing discipline includes understanding the rationale for project financing, how to prepare the financial plan, assess the risks, design the financing mix, and raise the funds. In addition, one must understand the cogent analyses of why some project financing plans have succeeded while others have failed. A knowledge-base is required regarding the design of contractual arrangements to support project financing; issues for the host government legislative provisions, public/private infrastructure partnerships, public/private financing structures; credit requirements of lenders, and how to determine the project's borrowing capacity; how to prepare cash flow projections and use them to measure expected rates of return; tax and accounting considerations; and analytical techniques to validate the project's feasibility. Increasingly, project financing is emerging as the preferred alternative to conventional methods of financing infrastructure and other large-scale projects worldwide. CASE STUDY : 1 PROJECT REPORT ON FINANCING OF AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE Airports play a vital role in the development of Industry and Commercial trade as they offer crucial services for transportation of goods and passengers from one place to another. They are also essential for domestic and international tourism, where limitation of time is the key factor. While airports play catalyst to economic development, the economic developments in turn generate demand for the former. As a result, the aircraft fleets of airlines are growing at a rapid speed with improved technology with regard to speed, time, capacity, etc., to cater to ever-increasing demand. To provide impeccable service, the airports also need infrastructural development. Thus, continuous improvement of airports needs airport management for planning, developing and operating efficiently and profitability to meet the present and future need of air travel; both, domestic and international. Airports also represent the country's door to the world. Passengers form their first impression about a nation from the condition of its airports. They can be effectively used as a symbol of national pride, if sufficient attention to their quality and up-keep is paid. Indian airports have been facing an infrastructural bottleneck since independence. A majority of airports was constructed during the Word War (1972) primarily to meet the contingent and defence requirements. Hence, they were not adequate to handle commercial traffic. These airports were opened for commercial operation in 1950, but till 1972, no major changes were envisaged in the field of airports, as the airports were under control of the Director General of Civil Aviation. In July 1967, the Government of India appointed a high powered committee under the Chairmanship of Mr. J. R. D. Tata, Chairman of Air India, to advise the Government about airport developments, etc. It was at the recommendation of the Tata Committee that the bill for formation of the International Airports Authority (IAAI) was placed before the Parliament, in July 1971. The proposal received the President's consent on the 8th of December, 1971.
The IAAI was finally constituted on the 1st of April, 1972, for maintenance and development of 4 international airports in India, viz, Mumbai, Delhi, Calcutta and Chennai. Later on, in 1991, Trivandrum was also declared an international airport and brought under IAAI. IAAI undertook major infrastructural developments at the 5 international airports, all the old terminals were abandoned and new terminals were constructed to meet increasing commercial requirements. Today, these airports are comparable to any other international airport of the world. The Government of India established the National Airports Authority (NAA) in June 1986 by an act of Parliament, to provide safe and efficient Air Traffic Control (ATC) Services across the Indian air space including overflight provision of aeronautical communication services, rescue and fire fighting services at domestic civil aerodromes and procurement, installation and maintenance of radio navigational services and communication services for all airports including the 5 international airports. NAA presently manages 87 aerodromes and 28 civil enclaves. Both the organisations were functioning in tandem at the airports. From this alliance arose a lot of differences with regard to proper communication and co-ordination, effective and optimum utilisation of resources, accountability towards the Government and the consumer (Public). The Government felt the need to merge both the organisations. The Airports Authority Act (1994) was passed to provide the constitution of Airports Authority of India w.e.f. 1st April 1995 with better administration, cohesive management and profitable and optimum use of the resources. The Airports Authority of India presently has two wings IAD (International Airports Division) and NAD (National Airports Division); the latter encompassing the functions of the erstwhile NAA (National Airports Authority of India).
1.1 Objective
To study the trend of the existing airport infrastructure development in India. To project aviation traffic and demand for the next 10 to15 years. To study the estimated cost. need for infrastructural development and the subsequent
To study the existing and future financing methodologies, keeping in view the trend of development and financing in other countries.
CHAPTER 2
Delhi - 16, Calcutta - 7 and Chennai - 2. The number of international and domestic airlines has now risen to 120 and 13 during 1996-97, respectively (4 times more): Chennai Airports IGI International Airports Mumbai Airports NSCBI International Airports Thiruvananthapuram International Airports 17 42 39 15 7 _____ 120 Domestic Airlines : 13
The number of embarking and disembarking increased considerably from 1972-73 to 1996-97. Passengers 1972-73
21,56,589 24,39,009
1,18,38,314 1,53,15,279
40,589 71,764
86,298 1,68,469
This tremendous increase in Aircraft movements and passengers was due to: Introduction of wide-bodied jet aircrafts like B747 and the stretched version of DC-8 on intercontinental flights. Changing over of operations by international carriers on inter- regional flights from the piston engine aircraft to pure jets. Similarly, domestic carriers switched over to B707, B737, Boeings Airbus, etc. Air travel was no longer an elite mode of transport.
The various development activities that have taken place at the 5 international airports between 1972-73 and 1999-2000 have been briefly enumerated below:
It was situated at Dum Dum at a distance of 20 kms from the Indian Airlines City booking office. The area of the land was approximately 1650 acres. The airport had two runways. The main runway was 11900 ft. long and the secondary runway was 7700 ft. long. There were 20 bays for parking aircrafts, out of which 7 were for international and 14 for domestic traffic. There is one newly built international building constructed in 1970 Rs.2 crores and an old domestic building constructed in 1960. at a cost of
central parking. Has peak hour capacity of 1200 passengers per hour or 1.2 million per annum. Improvement to secondary runway. Jeep worthy road along with compound wall. Extension of secondary runway at a cost of Rs.37 lakhs. Construction of link building connecting New Domestic Ter.B and New International Ter.B at a cost of Rs.1.43 crores. Extension of main runway at a cost of Rs.1.98 crores and strengthening of parallel taxi track at a cost of Rs.94.56 lakhs. Two remote parking bays at a cost of Rs.89.70 lakhs. Extension of main runway 07/25 by 595 mtrs at Rs.1.98 crores, two remote parking bays at Rs.1.24 crores. Extension of parallel taxi track to meet the extended portion of runway 07 Rs.3.16 crores. Strengthening of main runway 07/25 Rs.6.50 crores. Liquid Emitting Diode (LED) computerised flight information system.
A.A.I presented a report of various projects completed since 4/97, schemes in continuous and future schemes planned, to the Parliament Consultative Committee in their meeting held on 9.9.98 at Mumbai.
Chennai Airport Re-carpeting of secondary runway 12/30 for strengthening and grade corrections was completed in November 1999. Three additional remote parking stands commissioned at domestic apron for B-737200 type of aircraft.
Extension of Apron at Guwahati at a cost of Rs.2.15 crores was completed in April 1998. Expansion & modification of Terminal Building at Bhopal at a cost of Rs.4.48 crores was completed in September 1997. Resurfacing of main runway, provision of shoulders at Bhopal airport completed at a cost of Rs.5.53 crores in April 1998. A new Terminal Building at Bhubaneswar built at cost of Rs.17.77 crores was commissioned in April 1998. Two new aerobridges commissioned in July1998 at the International Block of Hyderabad Airport at a cost of Rs.2.71 crores. Extension of Apron and expansion and modification of terminal Building at Agra has been completed at a cost of Rs.12.77 crores and commissioned in August 1998. A New Terminal Building built at a cost of Rs.8.55 crores with all modern facilities has been commissioned at Raipur in Madhya Pradesh in August 1998. Resurfacing of runway, taxiway and strengthening and extension of apron at CA Raipur completed at a cost of Rs.6.91 crores in August 1997. Strengthening of existing runway at Aurangabad Airport completed in June 1998 at a cost of Rs.4.67 crores. Conversion of old Terminal Building into Cargo Complex at Nagpur airport completed in October 1997 at a cost of Rs.1.33 crores. Extension and strengthening of runway, apron and construction of new taxi track (civil works) at Indore airport completed in April 1998 at a cost of Rs.9.71 crores.
Table 2.1 Facility Primary & secondary Radar Date of completion Guwahati 30.03.97 Ahmedabad 31.12.97 Calcutta 10.07.98 31.03.97 31.03.97 31.03.97 31.08.97 31.01.98 25.07.97 04.07.97 01.09.98 18.06.98 09.10.97 Airport Cost (Rs. in crores) 29.40 29.42 38.50 0.51 0.51 0.51 1.44 0.64 (DVOR only) 2.20 2.20 1.40 2.10 2.10
Low Power Distance Trivandrum Measuring Equip. (DME) Chennai Collated with ILS Chennai Doppler Very High Srinagar Frequency Omni-Range Goa (DVOR) & Distance Measuring Equip.(DME) Chandigarh Instrument Landing System (ILS) Agra Lengpui Mangalore Aurangabad
Delhi: A new domestic passenger terminal near the international terminal is being planned with an annual capacity of 16 million passengers. The construction of this project is now proposed to be taken up in Xth Five-Year plan. The plans for remodeling the existing domestic terminal IB are under finalisation. The work is proposed to be taken up in two phases and the remodeled terminal shall be spacious and user friendly. The possibility of augmenting the capacity of existing Domestic Arrival Hall is also being worked out so that the domestic terminal is constructed near the international terminal. The present international terminal has already saturated (3.4 million capacities). The feasibility report for construction of Phase-II at an estimated cost of RS.801 crores has been resubmitted to the Ministry on 28.7.98 along with the Environment Impact Assessment study carried out by a consultant. The Ministry of Environment and Forests has stated that a public hearing should be conducted and the case resubmitted along with a NOC from the State Pollution Control Board. On completion of the project, the capacity of the international terminal will increase to 10 million passengers. Chennai: The domestic terminal with 26.75 lakh passenger capacity is likely to saturate in 2000-01. Phase-II of the domestic terminal is planned for implementation during Xth plan period. Calcutta: A new integrated cargo terminal has been planned and estimates will be put up shortly to the A.A.I. Board. The terminal (Phase-I) is planned for completion in 2003. With the commissioning of this terminal, the cargo handling capacity will increase from 28000 tonnes to 33000 tonnes. Thiruvananthapuram: A new international terminal is proposed on the other side of the Runway and the land acquisition by the state Govt. is in progress. Domestic Airports: Amritsar Airport is being upgraded to international standards at an estimated cost of RS.120.00 crores. The Feasibility report is ready submitted to ministry and the work has been stated.
CHAPTER 3
onward-connected flights are taken by free coach facility to cover road distance. The concept of providing a tunnel in between international airports and domestic airport for easy and quick movement of the passengers is still under consideration stage.
3.4 Security:
In recognition of growing threat to Security faced by Air Transport Industry, A.A.I. has provided several state of art equipment at the airports. X-ray scan machines, modern door frame, improved metal detectors, night security alarm system, surveillance camera, night vision binoculars coupled with airport security, compound wall with fencing, perimeter road security and anti-hijacking by trained and dedicated police personnel.
CHAPTER 4
It has to be appreciated at the outset that financing of airport infrastructure has some inherent problems. These projects require huge amount to be invested at the initial stages and the arrangement of finance is to be done internally, very less Govt. grant is available and Airports Authority is not registered under Company's Act.1956 so no public issues can be issued to raise money. So the growth rate of development fails to materialise.
Currently, the revenue from the taxes imposed in the aviation sector in the shape of IATT and FTT is credited to the Consolidated fund of India, with only 10% of FTT being given to A.A.I. Even this 10% is now sought to be taken back. Tacking into account the astronomical sum to be required for infrastructural development, there is a strong case for conversion of these taxes into Common Civil Aviation Cess, the proceeds of which should be credited to National Civil Aviation Fund to be operated by Ministry of Civil Aviation.
against the approved plan outlay of RS.906.19 crores. The resultant slow progress of infrastructure development was due to Govt./political interventions, slow decision marking by the Top Management, a decline in dedication in the working force, multiple and bureaucratic codal procedure etc. The merged AAI (International Division and Domestic Division) w.e.f. 1.4.95 planned for phase-III of Mumbai Airport, Modernisation of Air Traffic Services at Mumbai & Delhi, Aeronautical Commercial Services, Ground Safety Services, modernisation of domestic airports, Improvements in the existing facilities and spent the following amount out of internal resources: Internal Resources (Figures in crores) 1995-96 International Division ) Domestic Division ) 1996-97 International Division ) Domestic Division ) 222.93 181.73 320.16 501.89 131.12 189.25 320.37 228.52 140.16 375.00 515.16 100.41 262.03 362.44 Approved Plan Outlay Actual Expdr
1999-2000 International Division ) Domestic Division ) 625.04 228.04 397.00 625.04 159.61 201.02 360.63
In totality from 1972-73 to 1999-2000, AAI have spent RS.2468.68 crores against the Approved Plan outlay of RS.3633.63 crores. Internal resources of RS.3989.81 crores and budgetary support have financed the entire expenditure. Erstwhile NAA spent RS.1055.87 from 1992-93 to 1996-97 (VII Plan) against the approved plan outlay of RS.3595.00 crores. Govt. social commitments to invest in the nonviable/non-profitable domestic airports, investment in airports in remote and inaccessible area are further additional liability on AAI resources. During the year 1995-96, AAI received RS.9.97 crores from Govt. as Budgetary support for investment in Northeast Region and RS.34 crores (50% as Capital and 50% as loan capital) for remote areas like Jammu & Kashmir and Lakshwadeep Islands: During 1996-97, AAI received RS.16.00 crores from Govt. as Budgetary support and RS.10.96 crores for investment in northeastern Region. An amount of RS.2.06 crores has been received as Equity Capital as assistance from the Overseas Economic Co-operation Fund of Japan for further development of Aurangabad Airport. In 1999-2000 Airport Authority of India received from Govt. as budgetary support
The increased projected traffic demands in terms of Traffic movements, Passengers, Cargo etc for the next decade shall definitely ask for further speedy developments of international and domestic airports infrastructure which shall demand a heavy infrastructure investment. The financing through internal resources and limited budgetary support shall not be sufficient enough and therefore necessary sources of finance from private, external borrowings, foreign investments have to be studied in advance to keep pace with the international developments of airports.
CHAPTER 5
Passenger and Cargo Traffic in terms of WLU; All airports in the country handled 797 lakh WLUs. One WLU is equal to on passenger or 100 kg of cargo and has been adopted for appreciation of the combined passenger and cargo traffic at an airport. Mumbai and Delhi airports accounted for 54.4% of the total number of WLUs handled. The top five, ten, fifteen, twenty, twenty-five and thirty airports handled 76.0%,86.9%,90.7%93.4%,95.3% and 96.3% of the traffic respectively. The balance 3.7% traffic was shared by the remaining 90 airports. Ninety-two airports due to low volume of traffic are unable to meet even their operating cost. Further, following is the classification of operational and abandoned airports: Table 5.3 Total no. of airports No. of operational airports 82 83 90 56 No. of airports 10 73 46 6 abandons
Domestic : Mumbai and Delhi Airports accounted 48.3% of the domestic cargo. The top five, ten, fifteen, twenty-five and thirty airports handled 76.2%,87.9%,90.7%,92.9%,95.4% and 96.2% of domestic cargo respectively. All other airports shared the balanced 3.8% of traffic. International : Mumbai and Delhi Airports accounted for 74.1% of the international cargo traffic. The top five airports handled 94.4% and the top ten airports accounted for 99.5% of the traffic handled. Combined : Mumbai and Delhi airports accounted for 66.4% of both domestic and international cargo. The top five, ten, fifteen and twenty airports handled 89%,96.1% and 97.6% respectively.
CHAPTER 6
Table 6.1 Capital requirement Region wise. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rest. in crores 1210.96 1146.62 1148.14 360.00 437.28 ------------Total 4303.00 ========= --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Northern Region Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region North-eastern Region
Ministry of Home Affairs has intimated that the financing of schemes under Prime Ministers initiatives, will be in the form of 100% grand-in-aid, i.e. 60% through NEC and 40% through Ministry of Civil Aviation. Under the PM New initiative schemes, Guwahati Airport has been planned to be developed as International Airport. At other airports, all the modern facilities will be provided for the comfort of passengers and safety of aircraft operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rs. In Crores
4300 15000 10000 1700 1500 ---------Total 32500 Green Field Airports 20000 ----------52500 ======= --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Above requirement of capital does not include the huge capital required for making international hubs. Govt. of India in its policy on airport Infrastructure have decided to develop the capacity of airports in accordance with the future projections and proposed to reclassify the airports as: International Hubs Regional Hubs Other Operational Hubs. 9th Plan Expenditure (1997-2002) 10th & 11th Plan Expenditure (2002-2012) approx Construction of New Airport at Mumbai Construction of New Intl Airport at Bangalore Construction of New Airport at Goa
location should be explored to initiate planning activities and launching of project sufficiently ahead of building up of demand. Initially Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Calcutta, Thiruvananthapuram airports can be upgraded to qualify for international hubs and subsequently Bangalore, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Guwahati can be included.
6.10
Regional Hubs:
Regional Hubs will have to act as operational bases for regional airlines and also have all the facilities currently postulated for model airports including the capacity to handle limited international traffic. The identification of Regional hubs will be made on the basis of origin destination survey, traffic demand and the requirements of the airline. State Govt. can be closely associated as co-promoting of regional airlines.
CHAPTER 7
7.3
A)
Optimization of revenue from aeronautical charges, through negotiation with IATA and keeping Govt. approvals in view. A revolutionary thrush towards raising of revenue from non-aeronautical commercial resources. Non-aeronautical revenue earned by AAI during 1999-2000 was 748.76 which includes cargo Revenue and therefore represents 44.27% of total revenue whereas non aeronautical at Changis, Heathrow, Gatwick and number of other airports is reported around 60-70% of the total airport revenue.
Following new sources of revenue are suggested: Recovery of security cost by imposing security charges as levied in many countries. Increase passenger service fee, user development charges, and aerobridges charges. Create additional shopping areas at airports based on market research. Encourage direct transit passengers to visit shopping areas in transit lounges. Encourage visitors to the airports. Massive economy in expenditure by manpower optimisation, cost reduction carrying out Q&M studies, savings, elimination of duplication, increased productivity, contracting and services adopting new technology, automation, computerisation. Replacing inefficient system and procedure with efficient one and avoid delayed decision making.
Raising of funds by selling Juhu & Safdarjung airport to the private operators and using this money for the construction of new airports and modification of the existing airports.
Public Sector Undertaking under the same administrative Ministry can give inter corporate loans with the approval of the Govt. However , considering the week financial position of I.A., A.I, Pawan Hans, HCI etc, it is not possible.
Multilateral aid is available form international financial institutions like the World Bank group, consisting of International Bank for Reconstruction and development (IBRD), International Development Association (IDA), International Finance Corporation (IFC) and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA); and Asian Development Bank (ADB). The member countries of these institutions subscribe huge sums of money. They lend to member countries that wish to invest in development projects. ADB is relatively small with only 47 member countries, concentrating on the economic and social development of IBRD raises funds through the scale of AAA-credit-rated bonds in international capital markets. It lends funds to the credit worthy developing countries with relatively high per capita income. The rate of interest varies and set at half percent higher than its average borrowing rate, The repayment period is 12 to 15 years with a grace period of 3 to 5 years. Loans are given to govts. Or to agencies which produce a guarantee from the govt. IDA provides assistance on concessional terms to the poor developing countries that are not sufficiently creditworthy to deserve aid form IBRD . IDA receives its funding form contributions made by wealthier member countries. The IDA assistance is for longer periods of 35 to 40 years. It does not charge any interest by collects 0.75% annual service charge. IDA is also made only to govts. MIGA encourages foreign investment in developing countries by providing guarantee to foreign investors against losses caused by non-commercial risks. It provides advisory services to developing member- countries on how to improved their environment for foreign investment. Investments from oil exporting developing countries: An important source of foreign assistance is the investments from institutions and individuals from oil exporting countries in Africa and Persian Gulf, which are not industrially advanced. Such investments can be in equity, loans, debentures, bonds, etc subject to certain limits and restricted to new enterprises, hotels and hospitals clearance form RBI is needed for such investments. Equity participation by collaborators is the widely accepted form of foreign investment. Until 1991, Foreign collaborations are not encouraged and there was a limit on the extent of equity participation for foreign collaborators. After the Govts. Liberalisation policy in 1991, collaboration is allowed in more areas and the limit for equity participation by foreign collaborator is increased, even allowing the foreign collaborator to have a majority shareholding. During the last 2 to 3 years the number of foreign collaborations approved by the Govt. increased substantially and the direct foreign investment reached 10 billion US dollars. This is considered very small when compared with the direct foreign investment in China.
Share Subscription by Overseas Investors: Individual and institutional investors in the developed countries evinced considerable interest in equity participation in large Indian Industrial houses with good track record, EuroConvertible bonds and Global Depository shares (GDS) of prominent Indian Companies have become popular instruments abroad. Euro convertible bonds are convertible latter into
stock. GDS is an instrument issued by the managers of the offering and the represent company shares lifted on Mumbai stock Exchange. The Indian Govt. allowed several large companies- Reliance Industries , TISCO, Grassy Industries, Essay Gujarat- to raise equity abroad, and they decided to make private placement offerings of their shares. Morgan Stanley International and Lehman brothers managed the public placement offering of Reliance Industries. They raised 175 million US dollars: the issue in the form of GDR was over subscribed five times. ICICI acted as the custodian of shares and the Bank of New York as the depository. The investors consisted of mutual funds, pension funds, and some wealthy individuals for USA and countries in Far East. 7.10.12 This is also a good way of generating finance in which the promoters with excellent background capable of generating investor confidence in new projects can consider. The foreign exchange cost will only be the dividends on those equity shares. Share subscription of Non Resident Indians: 7.10.13 One of the long-term sources of foreign exchange to meet the projects foreign exchange component of cost is the share subscription by NRIs in foreign exchange. Depending on the mix of financing and the total number of requirements, the NRI equity may be sufficient to meet the entire foreign currency requirement.
Assistance from International Finance Corporation: The IFC provides financial assistance to the private sector in the developing member countries. The assistance takes the form of equity participation and loan, usually in collaboration with other investors. The DEAs clearance is necessary for any under taking in the private sector to approach IFC for financial assistance. It can grant loans in the currency of the member country or Switzerland for meeting foreign currency of the member country. Normally, the amount of assistance is between 5 to 50 million US dollars subject to maximum of 25 percent of the project cost loans are repayable in 7 to 12 years with normal interest and usual commitment charges on undisbursed amount of sanctioned loans. IFC does not require any guarantee from the govt.
CHAPTER 8
Projection for next 15 years i.e. 2015.16 Cargo International Domestic At international airports 2755 319 Domestic airports 156 166
Airports Authority of India have been working as establishing Satellite Freight City near IGI Airport i.e. Gurgaon in association with Indian Trade Promotion Organisation. Investment in future Cargo handling infrastructure is estimated around RS.400 crores.
CHAPTER 9
Funding Sources
National Government Internally generated funds Commercial Loans Foreign Govt. loans & aids. International Devt. Banks Region/Municipal Govt. Other (i/c private sectors)
No. of countries
44 40 25 24 15 10 06 Sources:ICAO
Constrained by repayment ability, China has mainly used foreign favourable loans such as Govt. loans from Kuwait, UK, USA etc and Export credit.
9.3.1 Changi Airport enjoys a sound financial position with capital and accumulated reserve of Singapore $ M 6155 as on 31.3.98.
Infrastructure financing of all the airports is done by both Private, Public and internally generated resources.
CHAPTER 10
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books Airport Management Airport Administration and Management S.Ramanathan John R. Wiley
Reports International Airports Authority of India Review of Traffic at AAI Airports 1995-96 to 2000-01 Annual Reports from 1995-96 to 1999-2000 Airport Infrastructure- The emerging role of private sector - Anil Kapoor, Private Sector Development Specialist. Strategic Plan to handle growing air traffic and earn additional revenue-Department of Planning, A.A.I. Ninth five-year annual Plan of A.A.I. Annual Review on cargo activities - Cargo Department, A.A.I. BAA, Changi Airports Annual Report Brief on A.A.I. for Parliament Consultative Committee
Articles and Presentation Paper CII Concept paper on building the sub-continent Hub of the next millennium at Delhi and Mumbai Policy on Airport Infrastructure. Presentation paper on `Asian Airport Meet' at Bangalore by Delegates of BAA, China, Australia. Articles in newspaper on privatisation of airports. Airports and Economic liberalisation - V.K.Mathur
ANNEXURE I
Years Int'l 1996-97 (Actual) IX Plan 2001-02 X Plan 2006-07 XI Plan 2011-12 XII Plan 2016-17
Passenger Traffic (in lac) Dom Total 242.80 @10.5% 400.00 @8.5%' 601.46 @7.0%' 843.58 @6.0%' 1128.91 364.90 @9.3%' 569.06 @7.8%' 327.15 @6.5%' 1134.55 @5.7%' 1498.13
Cargo Traffic (in '000 tons) Int'l Dom Total 479.10 @12%' 844.34 @10.5% 1391.00 @9%' 2140.23 @8%' 3144.70 200.99 @4% 244.54 @4.5%' 304.73 @6%' 407.8 @6%' 545.73 680.09 @9.9% 1088.83 @9.3%' 1695.73 @8.5%' 2548.03 @7.7%' 3690.4
ANNEXURE II
INTERNAL RESOURCES AND BUDGETARY SUPPORT
Fig. in crores
Year 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000
Internal Resources 3.24 3.69 3.59 2.85 4.79 5.23 6.51 8.85 11.18 13.96 15.35 17.57 22.59 38.97 52.23 71.75 89.07 93.72 86.43 86.92 91.75 95.62 145.82=976.14 228.52 222.93 267.52 375.46 404.07 3989.81
Budgetary support (Loan & Equity) 6.00 0.88 0.00 0.10 1.47 1.98 4.56 7.79 9.50 11.86 15.86 17.16 16.56 20.00 110.17
25.00
NAD
Budgetary Grant
26.97 29.02
ANNEXURE III
Annual Plan Outlay & Capital Expenditure
1971-72 1972-73 1973-74 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 (IAD & NAD) 1996-97 (IAD & NAD) 1997-98 1998-99 1999-2000 3.16 4.00 6.16 5.05 2.73 5.70 10.24 9.67 15.23 20.33 26.00 30.25 35.70 38.00 48.00=260.22 31.20 32.00 48.00 59.00 65.00 97.00 77.72 116.55 119.60=906.10 515.16 501.89 510.25 575.00 625.04 3633.63 2.90 3.10 5.88 3.59 2.49 6.26 10.43 9.67 15.65 20.76 19.89 31.21 34.73 39.16 50.67=256.39 34.08 32.02 49.08 50.70 51.18 71.21 58.23 79.31 71.56=753.76 362.44 320.37 331.25 340.23 360.63 2468.68
ANNEXURE IV(A)
PAX TRAFFIC PROJECTION ANALYSIS BY INTERNATIONAL & DOMESTIC AIRPORTS
YEAR 5 INT'L INT'L PAX TRAFFIC DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS (2) 106.70 114.57 @6.5% 122.00 129.91 138.35 147.34 156.93 @5.6% 165.72 175.01 184.83 195.20 206.16 @4.9% 216.30 226.96 238.16 249.91 262.27 @4.6% 274.41 287.13 300.44 314.38 328.97 (3) 7.80 7.53 @10.0% 8.28 9.11 10.02 11.02 12.13 @10.0% 13.34 14.67 16.14 17.76 19.53 @8.0% 21.09 22.78 24.60 26.57 28.70 @7.0% 30.71 32.86 35.16 37.62 40.25 5 INT'L DOM PAX TRAFFIC 115 DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS (5) 149.74 148.25 @10.5% 161.58 178.55 197.30 218.01 240.91 @8.5% 281.38 283.6 307.71 333.86 382.24 @7.0% 387.60 414.73 773.76 474.82 508.06 @6.0% 538.54 570.86 605.11 641.41 679.90 (6) 105.90 96.55 @10.5% 106.71 117.91 130.29 143.98 159.09 @8.5% 172.62 187.29 203.21 220.48 239.22 @7.0% @ 255.97 273.89 293.06 313.57 335.52 @6.0% 355.55 376.99 399.61 423.59 449.01 TOTAL PAX TRAFFIC 5 INT'L 115 DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS (8) 256.40 260.82 @8.8% 283.58 308.46 335.65 365.35 397.84 @7.4% 427.10 458.61 492.54 329.06 568.40 @6.3% 803.90 641.69 681.92 724.73 770.33 @5.5% 812.95 857.99 205.55 955.79 1008.87 (9) 113.70 104.00 @10.5% 114.99 127.03 140.31 155.00 171.22 @8.6% 185.96 201.96 219.35 238.24 258.75 @7.1% 277.06 296.67 317.66 340.14 364.22 @6.1% 386.36 409.85 434.77 461.21 489.26 (10) 370.14 364.90 @9.3% 386.57 435.46 475.95 520.35 569.06 @7.8% 513.05 650.57 711.89 767.30 827.15 @6.5% 880.96 938.36 939.35 1064.87 1134.55 @5.7% 1199.31 1267.81 1340.32 1617.06 1493.13
(1) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
(4) 114.50 122.10 @6.7% 130.28 139.02 148.37 158.36 169.06 @5.9% 179.06 189.68 200.97 212.96 225.69 @5.2% 237.39 249.74 262.76 276.48 290.97 @4.9% 305.12 319.99 335.6 352.00 369.22
(7) 255.64 242.80 @10.5% 268.29 296.46 327.59 361.99 400.00 @8.5% 434.00 470.89 510.92 554.34 501.46 @7.0% 643.57 688.62 736.82 788.39 843.58 @6.0% 894.19 947.85 1004.72 1065.00 1128.91
ANNEXURE IV (B)
AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT TRAFFIC PROJECTS ANALYSIS BY INTERNATIONAL & DOMESTIC AIRPORT
YEAR 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 INT'L MOVEMENT TRAFFIC 89930 9681 10233 10816 11433 12084 @5.4% 12737 13425 14150 14914 15719 @4.5% 16426 17166 17938 18745 19589 @4.0% 20372 21187 22035 22916 23833 99611 103642 107847 112236 116816 @3.5% 120935 125207 129638 134235 139003 @3.4% 143675 148510 153511 158685 164039 @3.3% 169480 175106 180922 186935 193152 DOM A/CMOVEMENT TRAFFIC 164263 173696 183685 194263 205466 @4.8% 215238 225488 236239 247517 259347 @4.1% 269997 281089 292644 304681 317220 @3.6% 328700 340603 352945 385742 379012 171324 181090 191412 202322 213854 @5.4% 225422 237574 250403 263925 278177 @4.5% 290695 303776 317448 331731 345559 @4.0% 360625 374945 389944 405542 421763 335587 354786 375097 396585 419320 @5.0% 440640 463062 486642 511442 537524 @4.3% 560692 584865 610090 636412 563879 @3.8% 689225 715549 742889 771284 800775 TOTAL A/C MOVEMENT TRAF 254193 267105 280716 295068 310198 @4.3% 323436 337278 351727 366838 382631 @3.8% 397246 412433 428217 444621 461670 @3.5% 477808 494522 511832 529761 548331 181005 191323 202228 213755 225938 @5.4% 238139 250999 264553 276839 293898 @4.5% 307121 320942 335354 350476 368248 @4.0% 380897 396133 411979 428458 445596 435198 458428 482944 568821 536136 @4.8% 551575 568269 616280 545677 576527 @4.1% 704367 733375 763501 795097 827916 @3.7% 858705 890655 923801 956219 993927
YEAR
INT'L CARGO TRAFFIC 5 INT'L DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS 3.53 25.67 @12% 28.75 32.20 36.09 438.74 479.10 @12% 536.59 600.98 673.13
DOM CARGO TRAFFIC 5 INT'L 115 DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS 128.37 132.27 @4% 137.56 143.06 148.79 154.74 160.93 84.28 68.72 @4% 71.47 74.33 77.30 212.85 200.99 @4% 209.03 217.39 226.09
@12%
@12%
@12%
ANNEXURE IV (C)
CARGO TRAFFIC PROJECTION FROM 2001-01 TO 2016-17
YEAR INT'L PAX TRAFFIC DOM PAX TRAFFIC TOTAL PAX TRAFFIC
5 INT'L
DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS (2) 433.21 453.43 @12% 507.84 568.78 637.04 713.48 799.10 @10.5% 883.00 975.72 1078.17 1191.38 1316.47 @9% 1434.95 1564.10 1704.87 1858.31 2025.56 @8% 2187.60 2362.61 2551.62 2755.75 2976.21 (3) 3.53 25.67 @12% 28.75 32.20 36.09 40.39 45.24 @10.5% 49.99 55.24 61.04 67.45 74.53 @9% 81.24 88.55 96.52 105.20 114.67 @8% 123.85 133.75 144.45 158.01 188.49
5 INT'L
115 DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS (5) 128.37 132.27 @4% 137.56 143.06 143.79 154.74 160.93 @4.5% 168.17 175.74 183.64 191.91 200.54 @8% 212.58 225.33 238.85 253.18 268.37 @6% 284.48 301.54 319.64 338.81 359.14 (6) 84.28 68.72 @4% 71.47 74.33 77.30 80.39 83.61 @4.5% 87.37 91.30 95.41 99.71 104.19 @6% 110.44 117.07 124.09 131.54 139.43 @6% 147.80 156.67 166.07 176.03 186.59
5 INT'L
115 DOM TOTAL AIRPORTS (8) 561.58 585.70 @10.42% 645.40 711.84 785.83 1868.22 960.03 @9.04% 1051.17 1151.46 1261.81 1383.29 1517.01 @8.6% 1647.53 1789.43 1943.72 2111.49 2239.93 @7.8% 2472.08 2664.15 2871.26 3094.56 3335.35 (9) 87.81 9439 @6.4% 100.22 108.53 113.39 120.78 128.85 @6.8% 137.36 146.54 158.45 167.16 178.72 @7.5% 191.68 205.62 220.61 236.74 254.10 @6.9% 271.65 290.42 310.52 332.04 355.08 (10) 549.39 680.09 @9.9% 745.62 818.37 899.22 989.00 1088.88 @9.3% 1188.53 1208.00 1418.26 1550.45 1695.73 @8.5% 1839.21 1995.05 2164.33 2348.23 2548.03 @7.7% 2743.73 2954.57 3181.78 3426.60 3698.43
(1) 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
(4) 438.74 479.10 @12% 536.59 600.98 673.13 753.87 844.34 @10.5% 932.99 1030.96 1139.21 1258.83 1391.00 @9% 1516.19 1652.65 1801.39 1963.51 2140.23 @8% 2311.45 2496.36 2696.07 2911.76 3144.70
(7) 212.65 200.99 @4% 209.03 217.39 226.09 235.13 244.54 @4.5% 255.54 267.04 279.05 291.62 304.73 @6% 323.02 342.40 36294 384.72 407.80 @6% 432.28 458.21 485.71 514.84 545.73
Note : Growth Rates are as per Corporate Plan prepared by FAST * MUMBAI,CALCUTTA,DELHI,CHENNAI & TEVENDRUM. * 6 SIGNIFICANT AIRPORTS ARE: BANGALORE,HYDERABAD,AHEMDABAD,COCHINCALICUT,GOA
11.0 BACKGROUND
APL was incorporated in January, 1992 and started with paper business in 1995. It started with an installed capacity of 5940 MTPA of kraft paper, which was enhanced, to 8250 MTPA by minor technological upgradation. Having achieved experience of running a paper mill, and looking at demand and supply position and also looking at the growth and future prospects of Newsprint industry, the promoters decided to add another plant for the manufacturing of Newsprint having capacity of 19800 MTPA at the same site. APL, currently, produces newsprint of 47 grams per square meter (gsm) variety. It has installed capacity of 19800 MTPA of newsprint & 8250 MTPA of Kraft paper. APLs clientele comprises of leading publishing houses of the region such as Lokmat, Dainik Jagran, Sakal, Nav Bharat, Loksatta, Gujarat Samachar, Phulchab etc.
The production process is waste paper recycle based and uses both Indian as well as imported raw materials. This plant is running successfully since its inception. The plant has generated cash profits right from the first year of its commercial commencement of its operations. The newsprint plant is running at 93% capacity utilization.
During FY 2004-05, APL produced 26,116 MT (i.e. a capacity utilization of 91.6%) and recorded a sales turnover of Rs. 48.76 crores and net profit of Rs. 4.08 crores. APLs networth as on March 31, 2005 stood at Rs. 10.05 crores The business operations of APL have however been a little constrained due to the limited capacity. Further, the present facilities in the mill do not allow APL to produce premium quality newsprint. With a view to tiding over these challenges, APL proposes to embark on an Expansion Project envisaging expansion of capacity by development of 49,500 MTPA to produce premium quality newsprint, which will fetch more prices in the market. Expansion project is estimated to be set up at a cost of Rs. 70 Cr. The project would have following key features:
New land site of 125 acres New paper machine capacity of producing 49,500 MTPA of premium quality newsprint Stock Preparation Equipment Captive Power Plant with a capacity of 6 MW
The cost of implementing Expansion project is proposed to be met by way of raising fresh equity through IPO worth Rs 20 crores, promoters equity of Rs. 5 crores and term debt to the extent of Rs. 45 crores. The project is expected to be completed within a period of 18 months and the expanded capacity commissioned by April 1, 2007. The implementation of Expansion project will result in increase of both the scope and scale of APLs operations and changing capability to produce value added products and flexibility to take charge of market requirements in various newsprint quality segments.
62
11.1 Past Operational & Financial Performance Newsprint / Writing Printing Paper
Particulars Installed capacity Production (in MT) Capacity utilization Sales (in MT) Average realization (in Rs./Mt) Raw material Cost (in Rs./Mt) Chemical Cost (in Rs./Mt) Power Cost (in Rs./Mt) 2002-03 19800 MTPA 14771.233 74.60% 15089.827 17465.54 7490.44 864.59 2161.70 2003-04 19800 MTPA 18605.762 93.97% 18435.333 18911.46 8321.78 1090.52 1780.09 2004-05 19800 MTPA 18766.399 97.78% 18750.788 20287.04 6989.95 1297.16 1911.92
Kraft Paper
Particulars Installed capacity Production (in MT) Capacity utilization Sales (in MT) Average realization (in Rs./Mt) Raw material Cost (in Rs./Mt) Chemical Cost (in Rs./Mt) Power Cost (in Rs./Mt) 2002-03 8250 MTPA 7001.817 84.85% 6989.334 13531 5435.53 904.75 1949.47 2003-04 8250 MTPA 7670.898 92.98% 7660.898 14530 6320.44 1189.47 1921.08 2004-05 8250 MTPA 7340.461 88.98% 7343.915 14602 5933.55 1177.99 1659.30
Financial Performance:
Particulars Sales Turnover Total Income Raw Material Cost Power & Fuel Other Manufacturing Expenses Staff Cost Other Expenses Gross Profit Gross Profit Margin Interest Depreciation & Misc. Write Offs PBT Tax Payment Deferred Tax PAT Gross Cash Accruals
2001-02 24.32 24.39 11.20 3.46 5.51 0.28 1.85 2.08 11.69% 1.23 1.37 (0.51) 0.003 ----(0.52) 0.85
2002-03 35.81 35.88 16.78 4.56 8.06 0.39 2.26 3.83 9.35% 1.76 1.98 0.09 0.007 0.034 0.05 2.03
2003-04 45.92 46.51 23.27 6.93 7.95 0.46 3.17 4.73 10.30% 1.56 1.90 1.27 0.098 0.46 0.713 2.61
(Rs. in Crore) 2004-05 48.68 48.78 20.78 7.09 9.21 0.50 3.49 7.70 15.82% 1.47 1.80 4.44 0.35 1.52 2.57 4.37
APL has achieved capacity utilization levels of 85 90% over last 3 years in Kraft Paper, whereas in newsprint it has shown a significant improvement from 75% to 97%. Raw material expenses of APL have decreased in FY 2004 05 as compared to FY 03- 04, along with increase in sales, which has resulted in improved profit margins. Gross cash accruals of APL over the four year period have been positive and were of the order of Rs. 4.37 crores for FY 2004-05
63
APL has improved its financial performance over last 4 years from net loss of Rs. 0.52 crores to net profit of Rs.2.57 crores, due to improved capacity utilization, as well as improved sales realization and control on raw material costs.
As on March 31 Gross Block Net Block Capital Work in Progress Current Assets Current Liabilities Secured Term Debt Unsecured Term Debt Equity Capital Reserves & Surplus Misc. Exp. not written off Net Worth Deferred Tax Liability Debt: Equity Ratio Current Ratio Asset Coverage Ratio 2002 19.36 15.53 0 7.68 3.50 10.90 2.25 6.98 0 0.41 6.57 0 2003 20.55 14.74 0.04 9.27 3.28 10.20 3.89 6.98 0.13 0.35 6.76 0.09 2004 21.04 13.32 0.15 11.10 3.39 9.91 3.43 6.98 0.51 0.018 7.47 0.36 (Rs. in crores) 2005 22.70 13.20 0 14.34 3.05 8.42 4.13 6.98 3.08 0.01 10.05 1.88
1.20
2.19 1.97
1.04
2.83 2.07
0.81
3.26 2.13
0.47
4.69 2.35
APLs networth stood at a level of Rs. 10.05 crores as on March 31, 2005. APL has a current debt: equity ratio of 0.47, which has come down over last 4 years. APLs current ratio as on March 31, 2005 stood at 4.69. APLs Asset coverage ratio has increased from 1.97 to 2.35 over last four years.
The cost of the Project is estimated at Rs. 70 crores. The head-wise breakup of the project cost is tabulated as under: (Rs. in crores)
S. No. a.) b.) c.) d.) e.) f.) g.) h.) i.) j.) k.) Add: Add: Particulars Land Site Development Buildings Paper Machine Stock Preparation Equipments Captive Power Plant Electrical Equipment & Installation Effluent Treatment Plant Preliminary & Preoperative Expenses Other Fixed Assets Contingency Sub Total IDC Margin Money for Working Capital Total Investment Amount 1.25 0.63 5.00 13.05 12.30 18.00 4.70 1.62 2.65 3.65 1.58 64.43 2.02 3.55 70.00
The details in respect of major heads of the project cost are given at Annexure III.
[The cost of the scheme has been considered on the basis of the total project cost as provided by the Company largely on the basis of quotations received by them from various equipment suppliers & contractors.]
The total Project Cost of Rs. 70 crores is proposed to be funded by Debt : Equity mix of 64:36 in the following manner:
S. No. Particulars 1. Term Debt 2. Promoters Equity 3. Subscription to fresh equity through IPO Total Amount (Rs. crores) 45 5 20 70 Proportion of Total Forward Cost for the Project 64.28% 7.14% 28.57% 100.0%
Promoters equity should not be a problem, as Rs. 0.97 crore has already been received. Disbursement of loan will take place after IPO. Current Status Of Project
Land
The company has made an application to MIDC for allotment of land at Industrial area at Chandrapur Growth Center, Chandrapur for the proposed project. The meeting of Land allotment committee is scheduled on 27th Oct. at Mumbai. The final decision is likely to be taken in this meeting.
Paper Machine
A letter of intent has been signed with Stora Enso and final draft of sale agreement shall be ready in a week time. The likely date of signing the Sale agreement is third week of November05.
65
Stock Preparation Equipment The negotiations with the suppliers has started are in advanced stage. The likely date for finalization of order is first week of December. Captive Power Project The discussions with the suppliers have started. The verification of technical data is going on and the commercial discussion will start in the month of December. The likely date for finalization of order is third week of December. Status of IPO
Authorized Capital has been increased to Rs. 20 crores. Microsec India, has been appointed as Lead Managers for the IPO. Preparation of draft prospectus for IPO is in advanced stage, likely date of completion is 15th Nov., 2005.
Promoters contribution
The promoters have brought in Rs. 97 lakhs, as on date as promoters contribution. The major expenses include payment of ROC fees Rs. 8.76 lakhs, fees to UTI bank Rs. 5 lakhs, fees to lead manager to issue Rs. 5 lakhs. foreign traveling about Rs. 3 lakhs. Total expenditure on the project to date is Rs. 22.43 lakhs.
FY Capacity (MTPA) Newsprint Kraft Paper Newsprint Expansion Capacity Utilization Newsprint Kraft Paper Newsprint Expansion INCOME Newsprint Kraft Paper Newsprint Expansion TOTAL SALES
EXPENDITURE Raw Material Variable Cost - Newsprint Variable Cost Kraft Paper Variable Cost NP Expans. Employee Expenses
29 9 0 1
29 9 0 1
30 9 55 3
30 9 64 3
30 9 73 3
31 9 76 4
31 10 76 4
31 10 77 4
31 10 78 4
66
10
11
Total Operating Costs 43 43 103 113 PBDIT 5 5 26 29 PBDIT Margin (%) 10.5% 9.8% 20.0% 20.2% Less: Interest Expenses 1.12 0.91 4.85 4.66 PBDT 4 4 21 24 Less: Depreciation 2 1 10 9 Less: Write off Prel Exp 0.41 0.41 PBT (Loss) 1.41 1.43 10 10 Less: Tax 1 1 1 4 PAT (Loss)* 1.44 1.46 9.90 9.91 Cash Accruals 3 3 20 19 Principal Repayment 1.50 1.65 1.90 6.75 DSCR 1.77 1.61 4.21 2.24 * The decrease in PAT in 2005-06 compared to 2004-05 is due variAPLe cost being considered for the projections.
123 127 31 31 20.3% 19.7% 4.08 3.39 27 28 6 5 0.41 0.41 14 15 7 8 13.73 15.03 20 20 9.00 9.00 1.93 2.00 to lower utilization
129 132 134 30 29 28 18.9% 18.0% 17.1% 2.69 1.98 1.40 27 27 26 4 3 3 0.43 15 16 15 8 8 8 15.24 15.58 15.42 20 19 18 9.00 9.00 2.25 2.02 2.03 8.00 levels and higher
67
Tenure of Term Debt Amount Rate of interest Interest Reset Upfront Fee Interest Payment Security Documentation Other Terms Conditions
Repayment in 20 quarterly instalments after two years of moratorium. Rs 450 million 8.50% p.a., payable monthly. The interest rate would be reset after two years from the date of first disbursement. Processing Payable to the lender on actual basis, as stipulated, if any. Monthly First Pari passu charge on the fixed assets of the company. Term Loan Agreement Other documents, including those related to security creation, as applicable. & Funds shall be utilized only for purchase of new plant and machinery as envisaged and for the renovation and upgradation of the existing facilities. APL shall not lend any short, medium or long-term debt or make advances to, or execute corporate guarantees or by any other means secure the obligations of, any company/ unincorporated body (ies) other than in the ordinary course of business without the prior written approval of the lenders. APL shall not, without the prior written approval of the lenders, make any investment in companies/ unincorporated bodies other than the statutory investments during the currency of the various facilities availed from the lenders. The lenders shall have the right to conduct periodical reviews of the performance of APL, during the currency of the assistance. APL shall furnish to the lenders periodic reports giving such details as may be required by the lenders, including but not limited to details of sales, working capital, loans and other borrowings and cash flow statements, to the satisfaction of the lenders. APL shall keep the lenders informed of any legal proceeding, the outcome of which could have a material impact on the debt servicing capability of APL. All documentation including Board resolution etc. to be completed by the Issuer. In addition to the terms and conditions contained in this Term Sheet, the final documentation will contain other customary clauses including but not limited to Representation & Warranties from the Borrower, Conditions Precedent to the effectiveness of the Facility and condition precedents to each disbursement, Affirmative covenants by Borrower, Negative Covenants, Additional Covenants, Information Covenants, Events of Defaults by the Borrower and the Consequences of the Event of Default, RBI disclosure norms, as applicable to the facilities of this nature.
Risk Mitigation
68
Technology Risk
Paper industry is a mature industry in itself and no major technological changes have taken place in the recent past. The proposed machine for the project is a second hand imported machine, which was closed down in 1995. A similar sister machine is running at a capacity of 950 MPM at the existing site. This machine was test run on every sunday since then and has been running fine. The technology used in the machine has been tried and tested across the world in the industry. 1
&
Newsprint The products of the company are well accepted in the market and the company has received an encouraging response from its clients. The company has already become regular supplier to some of leading publishing house of the region such as Lokmat, Dainik Jagran, Sakal, Nav Bharat, and Hitvada Prabhat Khabar etc. Kraft Paper The market for Kraft Paper Machine is local market and in the southern states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Tamilnadu. Substantial quantity of finished products are sold locally, as Kanpur is a big market having number of large industrial consumers like DCL Polyesters, Indo-Rama Synthetics, Haldiram Food International etc. for Kraft paper, apart from several manufacturers of corrugated boxes.
Existing operations APL does not foresee any problem in respect of sourcing raw material requirement for its existing operations from various suppliers both domestic and international. New plant For a plant capacity of 150 TPD based on waste paper as raw material, procurement of raw material from the international or domestic market is not a problem. More over the plant will be located in Kanpur. There is an Inland Cargo Depot (ICD) at Kanpur therefore all the formalities of Customs clearance, Clearing and forwarding etc. are done at Kanpur.
Financing Risk
The project cost of 70 crores is proposed to be funded through term debt of Rs. 45 crores, promoters contribution to the tune of Rs. 5 crores and Rs. 20 crores through fresh equity. Promoters contribution has already started flowing in. APL is also expected to be in a position to provide the envisaged level of equity support for the Project through IPO.
Selling Prices
Price realisations for newsprint for domestic producers are in line with the international prices. Against the average price of Rs. 20,063 (last one year) and prevailing price of Rs. 20,750, a price of
69
Rs. 20,000 per ton for existing newsprint (regular type) and price of Rs. 23000/ ton has been considered for the premium quality of newsprint produced under the expansion project for the purpose of financial projections. Average newsprint prices during 2004/05: (in Rs.) April'04 - March April'05 Type '05 Dec'05 Regular 20063 20667 Premiu m 21938 23917 Newsprint prices are expected to remain stAPLe in the medium term. Environmental Risk The new plant will be using waste paper recycle paper technology for manufacturing of paper. This itself caters to environmental conservation more that any other industry. It will be recycling the waste generated by the modern society and also saving on the precious forest reserves or the green cover, as other wise the pulp generated from the forest wood would have been used as raw material.
16.0 CONCLUSION
ABC Paper Mills Limited (APL) is one of the established newsprint & paper manufacturing company in Kanpur region. The business operations of APL have been constrained in the past by capacity. In order to tide over these problems and capture a share of the fast growing newsprint market, APL has decided to undertake an Expansion Project. The implementation of Expansion project will result in increase of both the scope and scale of APLs operations and provide capability to produce value added newsprint cater to requirements in various newsprint quality segments. Moreover the new machine will also be capable of making Writing and Printing Paper, besides Newsprint, which is an added advantage for the company and gives flexibility to take change of market. The said project will aid to the key strengths of APL viz. established presence in the newsprint segment, paper manufacturing know how, location advantage in terms of deliveries to any corner of India and low reliance on purchased power, which reduce the operating costs. The project is technically feasible & commercially viable. The project will help APL to sustain its operations and improve its profitability in the present competitive environment.
***********
70
17.0 ANNEXURES
71
PULPER
POIRE
STORAGE CHEST - 1
HD CLEANER
BACK WATER
REJECT TO DRAIN
DIABOLO
72
DILUTION BACK WATER HOLDING CHEST - 5 POST FLOATATION CELL THICKENER /P. FILTER STORAGE CHEST 6 STOCK PRE. STORAGE CHEST 7
DRAIN
FAN PUMP
S.R. BOX
MACHINE CHEST 10
MIXING CHEST 9
BLENDING CHEST 8
PRESSURE SCREEN
PAPER MACHINE
SLITTER REWINDER
DESPATCH 73
B.S.R
FINISHING HOUSE
2 a b c d e 3 A B a b c d C D a b c d e f E F G H
22.00 145.00
I J 3 A a b c d S. NO. B a b c d e f
13.50 3.00
AMOUNT
1305.00
74
Synthetic Wire Press felt Dryer Screen Pulp Mill / Paper Machine Erection & Commissioning
72.00
4 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L S. NO. M N 6 A B C D a b c d e f g
CAPTIVE POWER PLANT Boiler Turbine ESP Coal handling plant with bunker Dense phase ash handling plant Water softening plant Dearerator, feed water storage tank, DM Plant Cooling tower recirculation pumps Valve Piping, PRS etc. Compressor & EOT crane(15 ton) Fire fighting equipment & Piping etc. Mild Steel Chimney Civil Construction Erection & commissioning DCS system Misc. items ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & INSTALLATION Transformer PCC MCC with Switch gear HT & LT cAPLe Electric Motors HT switch gears Earthings CAPLe jointing material Lightening arrestors Mill lighting CAPLe supports, ducts, trays Paper machine drives COST OF PROJECT Misc items Erection & commissioning OTHER FIXED ASSETS FRESH WATER COLLECTION & DISTRIBUTION COMPRESSORS STEAM Steam distribution systems from power plant to paper machine MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM EOT crane 15 mt x 2 no. 2.5 mt electric hoist x 4 no. Weigh Bribge 40 ton Capacity Fork lifts 4 no. Pay loaders Misc tools & tackles Workshop (Mechanical, Electric & Instruments)
1800.00 628.00 420.00 130.00 55.00 50.00 23.00 30.00 65.00 110.00 37.00 7.50 23.00 75.00 65.00 45.00 36.50 470.00 34.00 40.00 35.00 63.00 67.50 63.00 13.50 13.50 4.50 13.50 10.00 72.00 AMOUNT 18.00 22.50 365.00 34.00 31.50 76.50
AMOUNT
75
h E F 7
Misc. Weighing System LABORATORY & QC Various testing equipment FIRE FIGHTING SYSTEM EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT Saveall, Krofta, Decanter etc. TECHNICAL KNOW HOW & ENGINEERING FEES
9 10 a b c d e f h
PRELIMINARY, PREOPERATIVE EXPENSES PROVISION FOR CONTINGENCIES Building & Site Dev. Plant & Machinery Captive Power Plant Electrical Equipment & Installation Other Fixed Assets Effluent Treatment Plant Preoperative Expenses CAPITAL COST OF PROJECT
467.00 158.00 14.07 63.38 45.00 11.75 8.07 4.05 11.68 6645.00 355.00 7000.00
11
Indirect Costs:
The following indirect costs are estimated based on information collected in respect of similar projects as a typical percentage of the direct project costs: -Temporary facilities and services -Basic and detailed engineering -Site supervision and management -Preoperational expenses (training, studies, permitting procedures, etc. other owners costs) In respect of the same, consideration has also been provided in respect of various elements like the detailed engineering (which can largely be done locally, implying much lower cost) and minor foreign support / supervision is needed in the basic engineering part. Contingency allowance to the extent of 10% of the direct cost has been considered while arriving at the estimated project cost.
76
Commercial Operations Date: 1st April (1st Year) Implementation Period: 18 months Installed Capacity per annum of newsprint: 49500 MTPA Corporate Tax Rate: 30% plus 10% surcharge plus 2% education cess Minimum Alternate Tax: 7.5% plus 10% surcharge plus 2% education cess Debt Draw Down begins: 1st June 2006 Tenor of Term Debt: 7 years ending 30th June 2013 Repayment: 2 years of moratorium + 20 equal quarterly installments beginning from 30th September 2008 Rate of Interest for the term loan: 8.5% p.a (payable monthly) Rate of Interest for the W/C loan: 9% p.a (payable monthly) Exchange rate: 1USD = 45 INR PRODUCTION AND SALES RELATED ASSUMPTIONS Breakup of the installed capacity (MTPA):
Newsprint Kraft Paper Newsprint Expansion TOTAL 19,800 8,250 49,500 77,550
77
Raw materials Chemicals Caustic Soda Sodium Hydrosulphide ETP Chemical Boiler Chemical Soap stone Powder Hydrogen Peroxide Sodium Silicate Deinking Chemical Optical Whiteners Caustic Soda
Consumption (MT/MT) Consumption (Kg/MT) 10.00 6.00 6.00 0.33 40.00 10.00 15.00 0.60 1.50 10.00
78
Chemicals Caustic Soda Sodium Hydrosulphide ETP Chemical Boiler Chemical Soap stone Powder Hydrogen Peroxide Sodium Silicate Deinking Chemical Optical Whiteners Alum Rosin Dyes Bonding Agents ETP Chemicals Utilities Power Purchased Power Generated Coal (Indigenous) Increase in Raw material Price
(Rs./Kg.) 20.50 52.50 3.00 96.00 2.50 22.50 4.80 48.30 2.94 3 23.3 94 13.6 10 Amount 3.25 2.65 1,400.00 1% p.a.
5%
10%
79
Annexure - VI PROJECTED PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT Expansion Project (Rs. Crores)
For FY Sales Variable Cost Employee Expenses Other Manufacturing Cost Total Operating Cost PBDIT Less Interest on term loan Less Interest - Working Capital PBDT Less: Depreciation Less: Write off Prel Expenses PBT Last Current Year Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 80 55 2 2 59 21 4 1 17 8 0.41 8 2 92 64 2 2 68 25 3 1 20 8 0.41 12 3 105 73 2 2 77 28 3 1 24 5 0.41 19 4 109 76 3 2 80 28 2 1 25 4 0.41 21 5 109 76 3 2 81 28 1 1 26 3 0.43 22 6 110 77 3 2 83 27 1 1 26 3 0 23
80
Annexure - VII PROJECTED PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT COMPANY AS A WHOLE (Rs. in crores)
For FY Sales Newsprint Kraft Paper Newsprint - Expansion TOTAL SALES Raw Material Variable Cost - Newsprint Variable Cost - Kraft Variable Cost NP Exp Employee Expenses Other Manuf. Expenses Total Operating Costs PBDIT PBDIT Margin (%) Less: Interest - Term Loan Less: Interest - Working Capital PBDT Less: Depreciation Less: Write off Prel Exp PBT Less: Tax PAT 38 10 0 48 29 9 0 1 4 43 5 10.5% 0.57 0.55 4 2 2 1 1.41 38 10 0 48 29 9 0 1 4 43 5 9.8% 0.36 0.55 4 1 2 1 1.43 39 10 80 129 30 9 55 3 6 103 26 20.0% 3.74 1.13 21 10 0.41 11 1 9.86 39 10 92 141 30 9 64 3 7 113 29 20.2% 3.47 1.22 24 9 0.41 14 4 9.90 39 10 105 154 30 9 73 3 7 123 31 20.3% 2.79 1.31 27 6 0.41 21 7 13.70 40 10 109 159 31 9 76 4 8 127 31 19.7% 2.07 1.34 28 5 0.41 23 8 15.00 40 10 109 160 31 10 76 4 9 129 30 18.9% 1.35 1.36 27 4 0.43 23 8 15.21 40 11 110 161 31 10 77 4 10 132 29 18.0% 0.63 1.37 27 3 24 8 15.55 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
81
Gross Block Accumulated Depreciation Net Block Capital Work in Progress Current Assets Newsprint Current Assets Expansion Misc Expenses Preliminary Exp Cash & Cash Equivalent Total LIABILITIES Equity - Existing Equity - Fresh Reserves & Surplus Tangible Net Worth Deferred Tax Liability Unsecured Loans Term Debt Existing Term Debt for Expansion Current Liabilities Working Capital Borrowings Total
87.09 42.01 45.08 11.87 17.56 0.01 0.43 62.03 136.97 6.98 8.33 71.06 86.37 5.91
87.09 45.94 41.15 12.01 17.69 0.01 72.55 143.41 6.98 8.33 86.27 101.58 5.91
87.09 49.32 37.77 12.14 17.82 0.01 82.45 150.19 6.98 8.33 101.82 117.13 5.91
11.48 3.55 0.01 1.66 37.50 118.92 6.98 8.33 32.46 47.77 5.91 45.00 7.74 12.50 118.92
11.61 14.88 0.01 1.25 40.49 123.81 6.98 8.33 42.35 57.66 5.91
11.74 16.86 0.01 0.84 51.11 130.28 6.98 8.33 56.06 71.37 5.91
12.14 100.03 6.98 8.33 22.60 37.91 5.91 1.90 45.00 3.16 6.15 100.03
Note : Fresh Equity capital of Rs. 25 crore is considered at an issue price of Rs. 30 per share
(price band is Rs. 30 Rs. 33 we have considered the lower band). Accordingly it has been shown in two different sub headings. Rs. 8.33 crore has been shown as fresh equity @ Rs. 10 per share, rest Rs. 16.67 crore (which is share premium) is shown as part of Reserves and Surplus.
82