Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

Original Article: http://feminismandreligion.

com/2011/12/10/the-g-word-bycarol-p-christ/

THE G WORD By Carol P. Christ


December 10, 2011 tags: Carol P. Christ, God-talk, goddess by Carol P. Christ Recently, I saw the following line in a promotion for a book to which I contributed: This volume includes voices from Christianity, Judaism, goddess religion, the Black church, and indigenous religions. The editors of this book are to be strongly commended for expanding the dialogue in feminism and religion beyond the confines of the Christian hegemony in which it is still all too often framed. Nonetheless, I felt hurt and offended. I immediately wrote to the editors asking how they would feel if a book were promoted using the words: This volume includes voices from Goddess religion and god traditions such as judaism and christianity. I am well aware that the conventions of English grammar dictate that the word God is to be capitalized when referring to the deity of the Bible and the Koran and in some other cases where a monotheistic deity is intended. I have been fighting this battle with editors of my work for years. Usually they automatically change Goddess to goddess. When I gained the courage to question this, an exception would usually be made for me, but the grammatical convention remained in force for other works by the publisher. Feminists are well aware that the conventions of grammar are socially constructed. This is why we said forty some years ago that man did not include woman and that he did not include she. This is also the reason that many of us have argued that male language and imagery for God needs to be changed. We must also insist that Goddess always be capitalized in our own work and in works under our editorial control. Not to do so is to capitulate to conventions based in patriarchal, hegemonic, and colonial ideologies. This brings me to the question of what to do about Gods and Goddesses. Here the issue is not simply the privileging of the Abrahamic traditions, but also a metaphysical preference for universalistic monotheism. Recently, I have been reading a number of feminist books on Hinduism. The authors often do capitalize Goddess when referring to a deity that conforms to monotheistic expectations, but use lower case when referring to localized or plural female divinities. Here is an example: there is one supreme Goddess who has many forms or who is the unity underlying all discrete goddesses. In other lines from the same book we find: a particular goddess like Parvati; and scholarly interest in Hindu goddesses and goddess traditions. As can be seen from these examples, lower case is used to refer to female divinities with particular names and to groups of female divinities. In books following these conventions, lower case would also be used to refer to groups of male divinities, especially in the phrase gods and goddesses, but (inconsistently) not necessarily to named male divinities, such as the God Krishna. After the author of an essay I encouraged her to submit to the Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion complained to me that the copy editor had lower cased both Goddess and Goddesses in her work, I spoke with the editors. I proposed that the standard convention of the journal should be to capitalize God, Goddess, Gods, and Goddesses in all cases. My argument was that to choose any other convention privileges male divinities and universalistic monotheism, following conventions that were established when grammarians believed that the

Christian God was the only true God and extended grammatical privilege to the God of Judaism and the God of Islam. The editors accepted my suggestion. It could be argued that all references to deities, including those to the god of Abrahamic traditions, should be lower case so as not to privilege hierarchical and transcendent understandings of deity. I do not disagree with this proposal in the abstract; the problem is that we cannot expect Christians, Jews, and Muslims to accept it. Moreover, if God is the name for God as Tillich once said, then the G words should be capitalized when used as proper names. But then do we say: Goddess is the name for goddess? And: Goddess in translations of invocations of Parvati, but goddess Parvati when the name is included and goddess in scholarly discussions of Parvati? Then do we also say the god of the Hebrews or the Hebrew god Yahweh? I think the simpler and more inclusive solution is to capitalize all of the G words whenever they occur. This seems to me to be the only practical way to put all Gods and Goddesses on the same grammatical, metaphysical, and postcolonial plane. Carol P. Christ is a founding mother in the study of women and religion, feminist theology, womens spirituality, and the Goddess movement. She teaches in the Womens Spirituality program at CIIS and through Ariadne Institute offers Goddess Pilgrimages to Crete. Her books include She Who Changes and Rebirth of the Goddess and the widely used anthologies Womanspirit Rising and Weaving the Visions.

S-ar putea să vă placă și