Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
roper bicycle t is essential for comfort, safety, injury prevention, and peak performance. The goal is to balance all of the issues at hand, optimize power and aerobic efciency, and avoid injury. At an average of 80 revolutions per minute, a cyclist may complete over 5400 revolutions during an hour ride, up to 30,000 revolutions over a 100-mile course, and 81,000 revolutions in the span of 1 week. Compounded over a season, one can see how overuse injuries develop. If properly tted, the majority of cyclists training correctly will remain injury-free. Bicycle t consists of static (measurements at rest) or dynamic (measurements while riding) evaluation. Dynamic t also involves video analysis with concomitant heart rate, wattage, and pedal torque readings. There are 3 contact areas a rider makes with the bicycle, addressed in the following order (Fig. 1): 1. Shoe-cleat-pedal interface 2. Pelvis-saddle interface 3. Hands-handlebar interface Whether a weekend warrior or elite Olympic hopeful, all cyclists are positioned the same, with the exception of the hands-handlebar interface. A recreational rider may prefer to be positioned more upright.
should be corrected. If a rider has excessive malalignment of the lower extremity, canted shims or wedges can be used. Heel lifts and most orthotics are not sufcient for cycling as the driving force is through the metatarsal heads.2
Saddle Height
Historical studies on formulas to determine saddle height have been discussed previously by De Vey Mestdagh.3 These formulas are designed to t a rider in the highest seated position to produce the most power at a minimal aerobic cost without placing undue stress on the lower extremity. The basic position is that of an almost fully extended leg when at the bottom of the pedal stroke. A formula endorsed by 3-time Tour de France champion Greg LeMond and his coach, Cyrille Guimard, takes the riders inseam length in centimeters and multiplies it by 0.883 to equal the saddle height, measured from the center of the bottom bracket to the top of the saddle4 (Fig. 3). An alternative method is to use knee angle measurements. The knee should be exed 25 to 30 from full extension, with the pedal in the 6-oclock position5,6 (Fig. 4). Cyclists who tend to pedal on their toes can tolerate a higher saddle height, whereas those who pedal by driving through and dropping their heels will prefer a lower position. Achilles tendinopathy can result from excessive stretch if the position is too high or from excessive force in the downstroke if the saddle is too low.1
Saddle Tilt
Saddle tilt should be close to level or parallel to the ground. About 60% of body weight can be centered on the narrow saddle. Saddle sores (skin wounds secondary to bacteria, moisture, pressure, and friction), perineal pain and numbness, or impotence may result if the saddle is not wide enough to support the ischial tuberosities or set to a correct height and angle. Time-trialists, who ride on aero-bars in a more forward
271
Silberman et al
exed position, prefer a slight downward tilt to decrease saddle pressure on the perineum.
bars, for a more comfortable position at the expense of aerodynamics. The rider accounts for 65% to 80% of the total aerodynamic drag.9 The lower the stem, the more aerodynamic a rider can be, though at the expense of comfort and power. An average size male cyclist can decrease his frontal area by about 30% by moving from the upright touring position to a racing position in the drops. If forward-exed excessively, maximal sustainable power is often reduced due to diminished crank torque through the top of the pedal cycle.9 Miguel Indurain (5-time Tour de France champion) and Lance Armstrong (6-time champion) are two notable cyclists with an upright time-trial position despite the total aerodynamic resistance. Handlebar tilt is a personal preference, but most cyclists prefer the lower curve and brake hoods to be slightly elevated. Too often, the bars are tilted downward or the hoods are rotated low, forcing the athlete to overreach. This may result in overuse strain, increased pressure on the hands, and loss of power through the core.1
FIGURE 1. Order of the three contact areas to address in a bike t. Torso exes 60 degrees with hands in the drops. Photo by Mike Spilker.
272
FIGURE 2. Cleat is positioned so rst metatarsal head lies directly over pedal spindle.
DYNAMIC FIT
A cyclists performance capacity is determined by three components: the athletes metabolism, biomechanics, and aerodynamics. A dynamic evaluation assesses all three of these parameters. Whereas the ofce examination of the athlete and bicycle is well suited for measuring geometric values, no laboratory investigation can simulate the real-world performance, balance, and aerodynamic issues that confront the athlete out on the road. Video analysis, measurement of wattage, heart rate, and pedal torque comprise a dynamic bike t.10 Any adjustments to position can then be re-evaluated in terms of objective rider physiological measurements. If a stem is lowered to provide a more aerodynamic position, but the rider is now too exed to produce power effectively (demonstrated by lower wattage, higher heart rate, and/or ineffective pedal torque numbers or pattern), then the position change was ineffective.
that are active in the recovery phase are ring primarily to reduce resistance versus the contralateral propulsive limb. Although most athletes believe they pull up on the pedals while cycling, this is rare in road cycling during steady-state efforts and is not essential to an efcient seated pedal stroke.9 Studies on elite cyclists during steady-state cycling have shown that even on the upstroke, the vector of forces is downward in the opposite direction of the pedal motion.11,12 The leg in the recovery phase is not lifted as fast as the crank is rotating. The elite cyclist, however, exhibits reduced negative force during the upstroke, in addition to decreased time in producing these forces.13 There are commercially available tools to evaluate pedal torque. Spin Scan (Racermate) provides net torque, a multicolor graphic depiction of one 360 pedal revolution broken down into 15 segments based on the riders pedaling technique. An efcient or optimal pedal stroke pattern is felt to be one with a atter or more even bar graph.10 An examination of national team riders demonstrated that maximal torque during the downstroke is what differentiated elite athletes from the recreational rider.13
FIGURE 3. Lemond-Guimard method of determining saddle height. Saddle height = 0.883 3 inseam length in cm. Inseam measured by placing a book between legs to simulate saddle and measuring line to mark on wall. q 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
273
Silberman et al
FIGURE 4. Saddle height set so knee angle is 2530 degrees with pedal in 6 oclock or dead bottom center position. Bert Webster performing bike t. Photo by Mike Spilker.
In terms of bike t, pedal torque appears most useful when evaluating injured cyclists and implementing drastic position changes for those riding with aero-bars. Further research needs to be conducted before a pedal torque examination can be universally recommended.
the most common, and by localizing where the knee hurts, sometimes all that is needed for correction is a small bicycle adjustment (Tables 2, 3). Posterior neck pain and scapular discomfort may be caused by an elongated reach and can be remedied by placing a rider in a more upright position. Ulnar neuropathy or cyclists palsy, a common ailment, results from excessive pressure on the handlebars. Contributing factors may be bars positioned too low or a saddle too far forward or tilted downward. Hand symptoms may be rectied by increasing handlebar padding, changing hand position frequently, adjusting handlebar tilt and/or height, and rechecking the saddle height. Low back pain may occur in riders who are overstretched on the bike. Riding more upright, raising stem height, and shortening stem length may resolve back discomfort (Table 2). A saddle too high may lead to lower leg symptoms, tibialis anterior, or Achilles tendinopathy. A saddle too low, with excessive heel drop at the bottom of the pedal stroke, may also cause Achilles pain. Correcting saddle height may address these problems. Mortons neuroma or foot neuropathy is common in cyclists and may be due to cleat position, shoe tightness, or shoe-sole irregularities (worn sole with cleat bolts pushing through; Table 2). Knee pain is the most common ailment of cyclists and may be due to training error, poor bike t, or both. Anterior knee discomfort may be due to a saddle position too low or too far forward in addition to excessive climbing, use of big gears, or too long a crank arm. Adjusting saddle position and modifying training can improve conditions such as patellar tendinosis and patellofemoral pain. Posterior knee pain may occur if the saddle is too high or too far back. Saddle adjustment as well as limiting pedal oat can eliminate the discomfort. Medial knee pain can develop from outward pointing toes and/or excessive oat in the pedals and can be addressed
FIGURE 5. Saddle fore-aft. When pedal is in the 3 oclock position, plumb line dropped from inferior pole of patella falls directly over pedal spindle. Bert Webster performing bike t. Photos by Mike Spilker.
274
Too much pressure on bars, handle bars too low, saddle too far forward, excessive downward saddle tilt
Perineal numbness
Saddle height too high Saddle height too high (excessive stretch) Saddle height too low (with concomitant dropping of heel to generate more power) Cleat position Irregular sole Shoes too tight Saddle too high Tilt angle excessively up or down
by changing cleat position and limiting oat. Lateral knee pain and iliotibial band symptoms may be seen with toes pointing in and/or excessive oat in the pedals. Appropriate cleat and pedal modications can eliminate lateral pain (Table 3).
Perineal neuropathy is seen with saddles set too high, tilted excessively downward or upward, or too narrow to support the ischial tuberosities. Saddle height and tilt may be reduced (Table 2). The sooner the overuse ailment is addressed through evaluation and modication of training and bike t, the greater chance of rapid recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Proper bike t is essential for peak performance, comfort, safety, and injury prevention. There is no one set of guidelines or geometric measurements scientically validated to t an athlete properly. Each athlete must be tted individually. Changes should be made during the off-season, one change at a time, in small increments. The goal is to balance all of the issues at hand: injury prevention, aerodynamics, comfort, and performance. The use of video analysis in conjunction with objective physiological measurements such as heart rate, power output and pedal torque has added science to the art of bicycle t. Whether caring for an elite cyclist or the weekend warrior, the knowledge and skill to t a cyclist are useful training tools. REFERENCES
1. Baker A. Medical problems in road cycling. In Gregor RJ, Conconi F, eds. Road Cycling. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Sciences Ltd; 2000: 68120. 2. Sanderson DJ. The biomechanics of cycling shoes. Cycling Sci. 1990; September: 2730. 3. De Vey Mestdagh K. Personal perspective: in search of an optimum cycling posture. Appl Ergon. 1998;29:325334. 4. LeMond G, Gordis K. Greg LeMonds Complete Book of Bicycling. New York: Perigee Books; 1987. 5. Burke ER. Serious Cycling. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2002. 6. Holmes J, Pruitt A, Whalen A. Lower extremity overuse in bicycling. In Mellion MB, Burke ER, eds. Clinics in Sports Medicine. Vol. 13(1). Bicycle
Medial
Lateral
Posterior
275
Silberman et al
injuries: prevention and management. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1994: 187206. 7. Hughes J. Dr. Andy Pruitt on Bike Fit. Available at: http://www. ultracycling.com/equipment/biket.html. Reprinted from Ultra Cycling, About Ultracycling Magazine. 8. Armstrong L, Carmichael C. The Lance Armstrong Performance Program. Emmaus: Rodale Press; 2000:3536. 9. Gregor RJ, Conconi F, Broker JP. Biomechanics of road cycling. In Gregor RJ, Conconi F, eds. Road Cycling. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Sciences Ltd; 2000:1839.
10. Drake S. Dynamic Bike Fit With the CompuTrainers Spin Scan Takes the Guesswork out of Positioning. Available at: http://www.computrainer. com/html/coaching_corner/dynbiket-example.htm. 11. Faria IE, Cavanagh PR. The Physiology and Biomechanics of Cycling. New York: Wiley; 1978. 12. Broker JP, Gregor RJ. Cycling biomechanics. In Burke ER, ed. High Tech Cycling. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996:145146. 13. Broker JP. Cycling biomechanics: road and mountain. In Burke ER, ed. High Tech Cycling. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2003. 14. Baker A. Bicycling Medicine. New York : Fireside, Simon and Schuster, 1998.
276