HOMI 501

EXEGESIS RUBRIC
Student Name: 1720 Structure and Organization
Clear introduction and strong subject evidence; clear and appropriate transitions; appropriate paragraphing; logical, strong conclusion rising from content.

1216
Generally clear introduction and focused; generally clear and appropriate transitions; mostly appropriate paragraphing; adequate conclusion relates to content but lacks objectivity or is vague. Assignment parameters (length 510 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; all 5 sections are clearly included; focus is generally clear and coherent (general sense of audience); good understanding of subject; adequate development; orderly, but stiff, choppy progression of evidence.

811
Adequate introduction; unclear; adequate transitions; reader can follow what is being said, but the papers overall organization is choppy; adequate paragraphs; conclusion is simplistic. Assignment parameters (length 34 pages, subject, objectives) not clearly observed; at least 4 sections of the paper are clearly included and are mostly focused (some sense of audience); thoughts randomly organized and presented; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated Relatively few errors in sentence fluency; multiple fragments/run-ons, poor spelling, punctuation, and capitalization; limited diction;use of trite words, slang, and contractions. Most of the questions within the instructions were answered throughout the paper; some higher level of thinking is evident throughout the paper.

47
Weak introduction; weak transitions; main points can be ascertained, but difficult to follow what is being said; weak and long paragraphing; conclusion repeats introduction. Inadequate or minimal observance of assignment length, subject and objectives; only 3 sections are clearly included; weakly focused (little sense of audience); unclear progression of ideas; conclusions/reflection weakly supported and/or illustrated.

13
Weak introduction and does not draw readers interest; little or no transitions; organization is disjointed and haphazard; paragraphs are weak; lacks conclusion. Inadequate length; objectives of assignment not met; less than 3 of the sections are included; unfocused; little or no sense of audience; serious and persistent errors in organization and structure; lacks understanding of subject; disorganized. Serious and persistent errors in: sentence fluency sentence structure spelling punctuation usage word choice A few of the questions within the instructions were answered throughout the paper; no evidence of higherlevel thinking was evident throughout the paper. Paper is not readable and is disorderly; Turabian format is not used; numerous format errors.

0
No assignment was turned in.

Assignment parameters (length 5 10 pages, subject, objectives) are observed; all 5 sections are clearly included; focus is clear and coherent (good sense of audience); obvious understanding of subject; orderly development.

No assignment was turned in.

Content

Grammar and Mechanics

Sentence fluency coherent, unified, varied; sentence structure complete; correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; varied diction, word choices.

Sentence fluency correct, varied; Minor errors in structure (fragments, run-ons); correct spelling, punctuation, capitalization; limited diction, word choices

Significant errors in sentence fluency and structure, spelling, punctuation and capitalization; diction weak or inappropriate.

No assignment was turned in.

Guidelines

All questions within the instructions were answered throughout the paper;higherlevel of thinking is evident; a strong application is developed.

All questions within the instructions were answered throughout the paper; generally higherlevel of thinking is evident throughout the paper.

Some of the questions within the instructions were answered throughout the paper; some evidence of higher level of thinking was evident throughout the paper. Disorderliness of paper makes it difficult to read; several format errors; significant errors in reference page.

No assignment was turned in.

Appearance is readable and neat; correct use of Turabian margins, font size/ style, pagination, double-spaced text.

Comments: Total Points Possible: 100 Total Points Received:

Format

Appearance is readable and neat; most of paper uses correct Turabian, font size/style, pagination,

Readability and neatness of paper are compromised by the number of errors; Turabian/ format is inconsistent and inadequate.

No assignment was turned in.

Page 1 of 1