Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Objectives
To calculate the Air kerma strength for BEBIG 60 Co source with Monte Carlo codes To calculate the dose rate constant for BEBIG 60 Co source with the protocol of TG-43 (AAPM) To compare the calculated Air kerma strength with published or measured value
BEBIG 60Co HDR brachytherapy source model Using EGSnrc Monte Carlo codes developed by National Research Council (NRC) of Canada Calculating the photon fluence rate in air with the source Using the AAPM TG-43 protocol
Analysis
Cont.
PEREGRINE:
calculations
PENELOPE: code for coupled transport of photons and electrons BEAMnrc: code system for modeling radiotherapy sources (Linac) EGSnrc: code for coupled transport of electrons and photons
Sagittal Section
TG-43 Formalism
General 2D formalism
The general, two-dimensional ~2D dose-rate equation from the TG-43 protocol is retained,
TG-43 Formalism
10
en ( E i ) . E . ( E i ) .E i . E min
E max
Where, Sk/A is the air-kerma strength per unit source activity. The unit is Gym2h-1.Bq-1 or UBq-1
Sk/A = 2 Kair(d) d2
( E i )
en ( E i )
K air (d) is the total air-kerma at the distance, d and the unit is Gy/Photon
is the photon fluence per unit energy and its unit MeV-1 cm-2 is the mass energy absorption coefficient and its unit cm2 gm-1
Ei is the energy spectrum and E is the energy bin size D = 100 cm according to the TG-43 formalism The factor 1.60210-10 is required to convert Kair(d) from MeV gm -1 into Gy
Calculation grid: Slab and radial thickness = 1-2 mm Photon cutoff energy = 0.001 MeV Electron cutoff energy = 0.521 MeV No. of history simulated for every point = 109 Dose for photon contribution simulated Considered one decay will result in the emission of 2 photons Average time per simulation is 5 hours for photon
true
= 3.6 10 5 2 D photon /( S k / A)
where Dphotons is the total dose by photons Sk/A is air-kerma strength per source activity into [U Bq-1] is the true dose rate per unit air-kerma strength for 60 Co source in [cGy h-1 U-1]
Phantom Model
Calculated point
Water
Com bone
Breast
Blood
Lung
Adipose tissue
Muscle
Soft tissue
Testese
1.00
1.85 1.02
1.06
0.26 0.92
1.12
1.0
1.04
Results
Energy fluence vs. Spectrum
Air-kerma strength
Article
Article
Lung
Comp. bone
Conclusion
In the calculation of air-kerma strength and dose rate constant, uncertainty were 0.15% and 0.12% which is acceptable limit. Published data of Palani Selvam, the uncertainty were 0.05% and 0.06% which are lower than our values. In this study, EGSnrc Monte Carlo code was used but Palani Selvam used MCNP code Relative absorbed dose in different tissues in 5 cm distance are approximately same accept lung tissue. 22% less dose in lung tissue with water The relative absorbed dose with different distances in respective tissue phantom, the lung doses are higher than the compact bone