Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
WL Vosloo Eskom
www.nampower.com.na
AIM OF PAPER
Comparison of two different test methods for the Incline Plane Test for tracking and erosion in insulator materials, as described in IEC 60587:
Comparison according to results for several evaluation criteria Goal: determining the superior test method for use in future experiments
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
Test Setup & Apparatus Test Methodology Evaluation Criteria Results Summary of Results Conclusion
Excitation voltage kept constant for 6 hours Typical standardised voltages: 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 kV Material classification max. voltage withstood by all samples
Voltage raised with 250 V every hour Series resistance & contaminant flow rate need to be adjusted Failure must occur on/after 3rd voltage step (i.e. 4th hour) Highest voltage withstood by all samples: Stepwise tracking voltage
TEST METHODOLOGY
Test samples made from industrial grade HTV silicone rubber Samples cleaned with ethanol & distilled water Surfaces abraded with P800 sandpaper (reduces hydrophobicity) Test voltages chosen:
3.5 kV/6 hours for constant voltage method 2.5 3.75 kV/6hours for stepwise voltage method Series A: Constant Voltage method Series B: Stepwise Voltage method
Sample designation:
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Comparison criteria:
Sample material loss [mg] Surface erosion depth [mm] RMS leakage current measurements [mA] Peak current level counts
One sample of each series selected for chemical analysis ATR-FTIR spectroscopy Samples not cleaned after testing to prevent interference with results Chosen samples not represented in mass loss & erosion depth criterion!
Samples cleaned after testing using distilled water Series A/constant voltage: higher mass loss Series average & standard deviation calculated for comparison Series B/stepwise voltage: smaller deviation around mean
Current measured using an Online Leakage Current Analyzer (OLCA) RMS values calculated over 1 minute interval Hourly series average current calculated from sample data First 2 hours ignored different series resistor & flow rate for that period
Similar hourly means & standard deviations Series B slightly higher mean ( 0.5 mA)
RESULTS: PEAK CURRENT BIN COUNTS OLCA registers peak current values per 1 minute interval (+ & -) 4 Major current categories/bins for this experiment:
Results:
Counts in lower current bins similar for both series Series B shows larger counts for highest peak current bin
One sample per test series analysed 3 specimen per sample: lower 17 mm, middle 17 mm & upper 16 mm region Spectra of tested specimen compared to spectrum of virgin specimen Focus areas for analysis:
Loss of alumina trihydrate (ATH) filler peak height ratio Loss of methyl groups degree of conversion, Oxidation through carbonyl formation peak area ratio
Chemical change indicated by decrease of peak height ratio or increase in and peak area ratio
Similar results for both series Series A reveals slightly stronger changes
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Test methods show similar results in most evaluation criteria Some slight differences:
Constant Voltage method yielded slightly larger mass loss & stronger chemical change Stepwise Voltage method has slightly higher peak & rms currents
Results indicate that neither method is superior when compared to the other
CONCLUSIONS
No standardised starting voltages time consuming to determine by experimentation Difficult to maintain constant arcing at ground electrode required by this methodology Hourly rise of 250 V not representative of field conditions difficult to relate test data to field data
Constant Tracking Voltage method preferred for future work & studies, including a comparative study of the erosion & tracking resistance of insulator materials for both High Voltage AC & DC
THANK YOU!